Willemswerf
Rotterdam, Netherlands

HEIGHT: 88m
FLOORS: ?
COMPLETION: ?
ARCHITECT: ?
USE: ?

http://www.skyscrapercity.info/images/buildings/246.jpg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/database/buildings.01/1557.jpg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/database/buildings.02/2248.jpg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/database/buildings.02/2185.jpg

it's ok 7/10

massive and looks like a hospital

i do like that cutaway section though, really animates this boring thing.

6.5/10

Yeah,the cutaway section is the best thing of this tower.
6.0/10

6/10

Bland, except for the cut-away. Even that doesn't make it interestig.

Tear it down, because of the wideness and relative low height this building ruins the complete Rotterdam skyline wich consitst of lean towers of middle height.
I can't exactly tell why and how but it does, tear it down.

1/10

Exept from the concrte entrance to the parking lot this building is far more better in real life than in pictures. 8/10

7.5/10 Quite good, it looks best on the first two pics

Yeah,the cutaway section is the best thing of this tower.
6.0/10

I agree too !! 8/10

I like it. The facade isn't bad either. 8/10

I like it as well. I'd love to work on that lip. 7/10

Yeah,the cutaway section is the best thing of this tower.
6.0/10


i agree!
there are more beautiful buildings in R'dam!

From some angles it's like a huge wall that serves only to block whatever's behind it. From other angles, however, it's a very striking design.

7.5 overall.

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, I like the desing, but.....I don`t know, at the same time looks boring..........7/10

6/10

7.5/10

I like it

8/10

Interesting shape, but very stumpy and boring facade. 6/10

7.5/10

7/10 ;)

6/10

6.5/10

From some angles (first two pics) it looks really interesting, but from other it looks boring. Overall: 7/10

Not working for me. 4/10

The windowless sides are ugly.
Apart from that it's ok
6.5/10

Should be higher. 7/10

7.5/10 :)

7/10 The most interesting fact of this building is that it featured in Jacky Chan's 'wo am I'

nice 7

Without that cutaway strip, the building would look like just any other building you could find across the world. I agree with some people when they say that from some sides it looks interesting (2nd picture), and from other sides it looks bland and boring (1st picture). I like it, but it's nothing too special, but cool nonetheless.

7/10

Looks like the architect tried to make it interesting but at the end it didnt work out, average i say but yet not ugly, 6

an icon for Rotterdam: 8.5

it's large..., and white..., but beautifull? no way!

7.5/10

not to bad, 7

7/10

7/10

7/10

8,5/10

9/10 :yes:

7/10

5/10

7/10

i like it but it's to grey 6.5/10

8.5

7/10

Nice tower, 7,5/10

7/10
absolutely

6,5/10 :)

6/10

Shape is ok, fascade no so much

5/10 :dunno:

8/10

I think it seems to be pretty.

7.5/10 :)

6.5/10

6/10

7/10

7,5/10

8. Good building. Regards.

7/10

7/10

voted 6.5/10

5/10
Fans of this building should check out the Jackie Chan movie " Who am i ", where he slides down the side of it.

its ok 6/10

8/10

7/10

Not really my style, its fat and i don't like white buildings that much. Also i am afraid it is going too look very outdated in the years to come. 5/10

7.5/10

6/10

Kinda nice. 6.5/10

7.5

8/10

4.5/10