View Full Version : Tempeveien 11A l TRONDHEIM l ???m l 13fl
Þróndeimr July 25th, 2004, 04:12 PM Tempeveien 11A
Trondheim, Norway
HEIGHT: ?
FLOORS: 13 floors
COMPLETION: 1975 ( Reconstruction 2003 )
ARCHITECT: Ragnar Enghs Arkitektkontor AS
USE: Residental
More:
This building was approved the 28.11.1973, and financed by the company Forretningsbanken AS. The tower was then a black commieblock. But in 2003 the building was reaconstructed into a more modern box!
http://home.online.no/~runness/ch/images/Trondheim/Tempeveien%2011a%20IIII.jpg
http://home.online.no/~runness/ch/images/Trondheim/Tempeveien%2011a%20IIIII.jpg
http://home.online.no/~runness/ch/images/Trondheim/Tempeveien%2011a%20August.jpg
Þróndeimr July 25th, 2004, 04:15 PM The buildings was a old black commieblock before this, so the tower looks still fat and is a commieblock, but a modern commieblock. The facade is nice, but the shaps is not the greatest, but a lot better that in the good old 70s. 5.5/10
Wu-Gambino July 28th, 2004, 05:05 AM 3.5/10
The Messiah August 5th, 2004, 10:46 PM Hehe,5.0/10
AtlanticaC5 August 5th, 2004, 11:24 PM 4.5/10
SeeMacau August 8th, 2004, 03:08 PM Boring commie block
4/10
james2390 September 5th, 2004, 04:02 PM 2/10
SteelCity32 September 26th, 2004, 06:13 PM really ugly. 3/10
Shafick September 30th, 2004, 07:26 AM Not bad......5 points....!
:)
Sitol447 October 11th, 2004, 07:43 PM 6/10 - Not bad.
jimm October 15th, 2004, 11:07 AM 4/10
Monkey November 20th, 2004, 05:19 PM Utterly forgettable.
5/10
RafflesCity November 21st, 2004, 11:48 AM this is really too mediocre to be posted here
andysimo123 December 12th, 2004, 04:30 PM 3/10
Fabio January 22nd, 2005, 10:03 PM 5/10
way too boring
Reflex March 4th, 2005, 12:25 AM 5.5/10.
NiceGuy March 4th, 2005, 06:56 PM Not exactly a beautiful or creative building, but it probably looks much better than it used to. A few bonus-points for the number of stories that I guess makes it stick out from the rest in Trondhjem: 4/10
Desven March 4th, 2005, 08:30 PM 3/10
JDRS March 5th, 2005, 04:58 PM It's not the worst block I've seen like that, but other than that poor quality.
4.5/10
london-b March 5th, 2005, 09:03 PM Thats no scraper! 2/10
superskyline April 3rd, 2005, 01:45 AM hate the facade.... really ugly 3/10
ROYAL BLUE April 3rd, 2005, 06:30 AM 3.5/10
Medo June 21st, 2005, 08:02 AM 6/10
beta29 June 22nd, 2005, 07:09 PM 5.5/10...
DRAKKO July 1st, 2005, 08:01 AM 3/10
El_Greco September 28th, 2005, 06:51 PM 1/10
Sinjin P. December 20th, 2005, 03:31 AM It needs to undergo rehabilitation. 4/10 ;)
forvine December 21st, 2005, 08:54 AM Fat and short and ugly
1/10 :puke:
Accura4Matalan December 23rd, 2005, 12:11 PM 1/10. Why bother posting this...
gutooo August 21st, 2006, 01:08 AM 4/10
ex.cffuny August 22nd, 2006, 12:28 AM 0/10 a fe!!!
Miguel_Prat August 31st, 2006, 02:44 PM 3/10
ZZ-II August 31st, 2006, 10:50 PM not tall, nothing special: 5/10
Liwwadden September 2nd, 2006, 01:07 AM Actually, it would be better if this building was never posted. :yes:
Skyman December 27th, 2006, 08:36 AM 3/10
marpa June 22nd, 2007, 02:30 PM 6/10
meus October 12th, 2007, 06:27 PM :ohno: 3,5/10
Racingfreak October 13th, 2007, 11:07 AM This is no skyscraper. It's a ugly old commieblock 3/10
Astralis October 13th, 2007, 02:49 PM 5/10
Prince Victor March 1st, 2008, 07:42 AM 6/10
tonyssa May 8th, 2009, 01:54 AM 3/10
henry hill May 12th, 2009, 12:17 AM 5/10
MasonicStage™ May 14th, 2009, 07:36 PM dont like it, sorry. 2/10
Jan Del Castillo August 11th, 2009, 03:38 AM 6. Regards.
xavarreiro August 24th, 2009, 07:04 PM 6/10
Heroico March 20th, 2010, 10:17 PM 5/10
sieradzanin1 March 22nd, 2010, 05:06 PM 5/10
romanito August 28th, 2010, 03:38 PM 8/10
v-sun May 2nd, 2011, 04:25 PM 4/10
Eric Offereins May 2nd, 2011, 11:27 PM 4/10 :(
yudibali2008 July 26th, 2011, 02:45 PM 4/10
Srdjan Adamovic May 2nd, 2012, 12:07 PM 5.5/10
X Bomby May 3rd, 2012, 09:26 AM No beating around the bush with me, ugly 1/10
Dakaro May 4th, 2012, 10:59 PM 4.5 :D
|
|