Blend
July 29th, 2004, 01:07 PM
hehe Cull.. Heres a diagram for Queenslands top 10 Proposed, UC and Completed.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v280/Blend/Graphic2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v280/Blend/Graphic2.jpg
|
View Full Version : Queensland Future Top 10 Blend July 29th, 2004, 01:07 PM hehe Cull.. Heres a diagram for Queenslands top 10 Proposed, UC and Completed. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v280/Blend/Graphic2.jpg Aussie Bhoy July 29th, 2004, 01:44 PM Nice Blend, let's hope they all come true, especially Austcorp Blend July 29th, 2004, 01:53 PM i made an error with the last one though. Should be Skyline, not Waterfront. I just forgot about it defec8R July 29th, 2004, 01:55 PM Great job. Although maybe you could draw Dolphin as a big sail, like in the render? (on 1st page of Dolphin thread) Blend July 29th, 2004, 02:07 PM i will change that soon then. I didnt see it, i only checked on skyscrapers.com and there was no render. Danubis October 10th, 2004, 12:15 PM you can take emerald off that diagram now and leave waterfront place in 10th Blend October 10th, 2004, 12:35 PM i would... but i formatted many times. n dont have the program, nor the file. FAVELLE October 10th, 2004, 01:08 PM Waterfront 162m ,Skyline 158m.... No??? KJBrissy May 24th, 2006, 07:35 AM My how things have changed!!! scottsimmons80 May 24th, 2006, 11:32 AM Is Austcorp supposed to be Vision? SoulvisionQ1 May 24th, 2006, 11:51 AM ^^ Yea, at the time it was made, Vision was still a rumour...ahhhhh how times have changed, and in 2 months Vision will start! KJBrissy May 24th, 2006, 12:16 PM ^^ Not only that...but 40m taller!!! citiboy May 24th, 2006, 12:24 PM how times change--- any thing over 200m was south of the border Brissy4me May 24th, 2006, 02:06 PM Now Brisbane will have taller buildings than Sydney!! Now we just need some iconic structures of an international scale like the opera house and harbour bridge. Locke May 29th, 2006, 10:51 AM Here is a list of top ten in a few years based on built/uc/approv/prop not counting notionals ranked to roof! We got more 200m+ tallies than Melbourne or Sydney there! Pretty good considering we had none before. At this rate should have twice as many 200m+ tallies as Melbourne once 480 Queen and another 200m+ come on line, maybe Elite? In any case, looking good!:) 1. Q1 275m (322m to spire) 2. Vision 265m (290m to spire) 3. Empire Square 248m 4. Soul 240m 5. Emerald 230m 6. Circle on Cavill North Tower 220m 7. ANA 208m (243m spire). 8. Aurora 207m 9. Riparian Plaza 200m (250m to spire) 10. 549 Queen Street (196m to spire) SoulvisionQ1 May 29th, 2006, 11:23 AM Its coming...I can feel it....that one daring building... :) :) :) :) http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i16/soulvisionQ1/imagine.jpg cp1 May 29th, 2006, 12:48 PM Yep i hope so. Is it just me or did this forum become thinner (if u get what i mean)? SoulvisionQ1 May 29th, 2006, 12:53 PM ^^ Yeah it has...but i kinda like it! Locke May 29th, 2006, 12:54 PM Yeah the thin width is pretty annoying. SoulVisionQ1 that would be nice, though maybe not quite as fat! I'm actually like something taller, something totally ballsy, a paradigm shift in the way we view tallies in SEQ. I would call the tallest tower: 1 Pretty short name aye, shorter even than Q1, plus the number looks like a tower, and people would refer to it as 'the one tower', like the one ring... the one tower to rule them all...:P I should pitch that to Sunland!:) SoulvisionQ1 May 29th, 2006, 12:58 PM ^^ lol, or the name "it" for it would be "the" tower, ahhh yeah... the name "the" that would be different!! notra May 29th, 2006, 02:20 PM Hey Soulvq - you've apparently killed off Emerald. Locke still believes it's there. Ages ago I was a lone voice saying Emerald would rise from the dead but now I've left it up to you, Cul and others to inform us. I also thought the Domaine site was reporting 'positive' misinformation long after the building had been killed. Of course what's news today can be changed tomorrow. Since obtaining a building approval is now commonly accepted as a mechanism for increasing land resale prices, sadly UC is becoming the true indicator for real development. Certainly claims of presales provide only a poor guide - not only for the infamous Ann St project, but also for Domaine! SoulvisionQ1 May 29th, 2006, 02:26 PM The domaine, has been a problem tower IMO...It just have never been true to the whole development stages from what i can see...so i am glad they are re doing it to either a hotel or who knows what? ^^ Emerald tower, well until it becomes "proposed" and the DA is submitted...I would be happy to put it in. but yeah... Locke May 29th, 2006, 02:29 PM Emerald is proposed SoulvisionQ1, always has been, it just needs to the final tick of approval from the minister. No need to resubmit an application. SoulvisionQ1 May 29th, 2006, 02:32 PM ^ true, but ugh. I just want to wait to be sure...you never know about dubai money. notra May 29th, 2006, 02:39 PM ^ true, but ugh. I just want to wait to be sure...you never know about dubai money. to say nothing about the new NIMBY campaign to stop it!!! (i have an apartment across the street.) SoulvisionQ1 May 29th, 2006, 02:41 PM ^^ don't get me started about the Nimbys against this...They are proposing this when there could be a possible 90+ tower just across the road... :bash: Locke May 29th, 2006, 03:52 PM Dubai money? I can't think of better money to back a project with, no pre-sales! I wish all our projects were backed by Dubai! If ever there was a sure thing building once approved, it's Emerald! It will go up straight away. As for the few nimbys, bah, nothing new there, a non-issue. Emerald just needs to reassessed by the minister, I read the case, she has to reassess it under the code, it complies with the code, Emerald gets approved. Just a question of how long it takes. KJBrissy May 30th, 2006, 01:07 AM ^^Should it then be updated on emporis to proposed?? Locke May 30th, 2006, 02:24 AM ^^Should it then be updated on emporis to proposed?? yep, it's still proposed, always has been. Brissy4me June 6th, 2007, 11:52 AM I think this needs to be updated. 1. Q1 275m (322m to spire) 2. 480 Queen St 275m 3. Eagle St 1 270m 4. Eagle St 2 270m 5. Vision 265m (290m to spire) 6. Empire Square 248m 7. Soul 240m 8. Circle on Cavill North Tower 220m 9. ANA 208m (243m spire). 10. Aurora 207m Riparian Plaza, Riverside II and 549 Queen St don't even make the list!!!! BrizzyChris June 6th, 2007, 12:13 PM Except those heights are wrong: 1. Q1 - 275m 2. Vision - 259m 3. Eagle St 1 - 250m (unknown height so far) 4. Eagle St 1 - 250m (unknown height so far) 5. Meriton Tower - 243m (unknown height so far) 6. Empire Square - 240m 7. 480 Queen St - 240m 8. Soul - 240m 9. Circle of Cavill North - 219m 10. ANA - 208m BrizzyChris June 6th, 2007, 12:13 PM Pretty impressive future, considering only 2 are built so far. ||-GOB-|| June 6th, 2007, 12:34 PM It's pretty amazing when you list them all like that. Ians Resort June 7th, 2007, 01:01 AM Except those heights are wrong: 1. Q1 - 275m 2. Vision - 259m 3. Eagle St 1 - 250m (unknown height so far) 4. Eagle St 1 - 250m (unknown height so far) 5. Meriton Tower - 243m (unknown height so far) 6. Empire Square - 240m 7. 480 Queen St - 240m 8. Soul - 240m 9. Circle of Cavill North - 219m 10. ANA - 208m HOW ABOUT GOLD COAST TRANSIT CENTRE - 80 - 90 floors for sure! KJBrissy June 7th, 2007, 01:03 AM ^^That hasn't even got a design, height, developer or anything yet. Can't be put there yet. CULWULLA June 7th, 2007, 01:28 AM gee, looks like i got a bit of work to do.lol Brissy4me June 7th, 2007, 04:56 AM ^^ LOL. don't worry Cul, you'll do a marvelous job as always ;) I forgot about Meriton Tower. The list will probably need to be updated again soon after July 1 with expected new proposals such as the new hotels. |