View Full Version : Pudong International Information Port l SHANGHAI l 211m l 40fl
D-Mac November 24th, 2002, 09:47 AM Pudong International Information Port
Shanghai, China
HEIGHT: 211m/692 feet ( antenna: 282m/926 feet )
FLOORS: 40 floors
COMPLETION: 2001
ARCHITECT: Nikken Sekkei
Shanghai Information Center is an intelligent building integrated with telecommunication, information and business, it is also a major part of the Shanghai Information Port. Located in Pudong Lujiazui Central Financial District, Shanghai Information Center with a total floor space of 101,235 square meters occupies a site area of 8,250 square meters, with 40 floors above the ground and 4 floors below ground level.
http://tinypic.com/5mtkl
http://tinypic.com/5mtna
http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/ROT/piip.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/skyscraperrot/158338.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/skyscraperrot/2941shanghai_dawn01.jpg
MiCH November 24th, 2002, 12:50 PM Nice looking building! I'd rate it 8/10.
RafflesCity November 24th, 2002, 02:41 PM 7/10
That glass on the facade looks good. Reminds me a little of Commerzbank in Frankfurt.
Eddy November 24th, 2002, 05:01 PM Nice design 8.5/10
CG5 November 24th, 2002, 10:35 PM My second fave in Shanghai. You have to see pics of the lobby to truly appreciate how cool this building is. Unfortunately, I don't have any.
10/10
De Snor November 24th, 2002, 10:46 PM Good , an 8
Sunflower November 24th, 2002, 11:09 PM great shape, great facade, great building :)
9.5/10
Liz L November 25th, 2002, 12:44 AM 8/10 - Really reaches for the sky, and for once I'm not going to nitpick about setbacks! Nice, slim shape (even broad side on), and a good contrast between glass and stone on the facade. The spire seems to work well, too, though I'd like to see some shots from that side of the building...
I might have suggested a few setbacks between spire and tower, but it looks like the spire is the top of a structure on the other side, which might not need them...
The stone sections of the facade might benefit from a bit more detail...
SteelCity32 November 25th, 2002, 02:53 AM it's ok. Don't care for the spire. 8/10
SUNNI November 25th, 2002, 09:37 AM 7 for this... the size and shape dont match..
Bobdreamz December 4th, 2002, 04:17 PM this is oddly shaped & massed...looks like a smaller building is in front of it...and they could have done something more with the top instead of those 4 gills..at least stretch them all the way across the top!...no continuity at all...bleh...6.5/10..
Cliff December 5th, 2002, 08:59 AM 7/10 no comments
skyway December 14th, 2002, 10:01 AM the rendering looks good
6/10
TYW December 14th, 2002, 10:20 AM 7/10
not bad!!
DrumCorpsAlum February 22nd, 2003, 10:15 PM 7.5/10. It's unique, and definately not plain, meaning that this building has different things to offer, and is not just one design. More than one thing do look at. I am rambling, but you know what I mean.
Wu-Gambino February 23rd, 2003, 09:00 AM 6/10
Decent.
The Messiah February 23rd, 2003, 07:03 PM Well it's a nice tower.Hard to rate it.
A 7.0/10
Monkey March 18th, 2003, 07:28 AM O dear! Seems like someone tried to get rid of all his Scrabble letters in one move. :D A bit much going on here! I know, and I admit it: I'm usually the first to gripe about a plain, even fassade, but to me the various elements here somehow don't fit together very well, the whole building has something arbitrary about it.
A 6.
renell March 18th, 2003, 10:49 AM 7/10.. don't like the glass, but generally its ok
Evergrey April 11th, 2003, 04:18 AM 4 Pretty ugly building...
airsickpenthousedweller April 16th, 2003, 09:06 PM Shaped like something you'd expect to find inside some electronic device....
huaiwei April 16th, 2003, 11:18 PM Look at the second picture....its like Nokia build this as their headquaters complex...a huge handphone. :D Or maybe it looks more like a walkie-talkie?
Anyway 5/10 for being too "technical".
airsickpenthousedweller April 17th, 2003, 11:08 PM haha yes ! Maybe a good entry for this thread:
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=35729
TropicalSQ744 May 4th, 2003, 12:07 PM Pretty good scraper.. The spire looks like actually some work has been put into designing it.. But I must say the shape is a weird mix.. :rant:
7.5/10
rj2uman May 21st, 2003, 06:37 AM 8/10 I like the Grey and the Glass.
New Jack City July 31st, 2003, 11:48 PM 6/10...The building can't make up it's mind. It's overdetailed, they should have either used the glass facade or the stone facade. Weird shape too.
james2390 August 7th, 2003, 06:31 PM 8
AtlanticaC5 September 1st, 2003, 02:24 PM It's OK, reminds me a bit of Reuters Building in NYC
7.5/10
SFtoBoise September 1st, 2003, 09:47 PM 5.5/10
Patrick September 7th, 2003, 07:23 PM not my style
5
SeeMacau September 12th, 2003, 08:56 AM 10/10
One of my favourite in Shanghai !!
Fabio November 8th, 2003, 04:01 AM 8.5/10
Nice tower.
MCC November 8th, 2003, 05:04 AM 8/10
manx_bkk November 18th, 2003, 07:00 AM 7.5/10
Nice building but looks very thin. Don't like it so much.
baqthier December 5th, 2003, 01:29 AM 6/10. And I never noticed this is as tall as 282m before!
7 World Trade April 3rd, 2004, 04:56 AM it has a revolutionary look, but i don't like how that antenna-like spire get to be counted as part of the building's height. without the spire thingey, it would of only been 211 m tall.
7.5/10
Trances June 24th, 2004, 10:45 AM dont realyl care for it 6/10
yoyo22 July 21st, 2004, 08:22 PM 5/10
A decidely average building. Looks like a suburban American building, something you would find outside of Detroit, for example, except a lot taller, but not tall enough to get any wow points. The design is a failed attempt at art, but when I see it I dont think its so bad. Still doesnt remind of a skyscraper, more like just a midrise, and not too interesting.
Dubai-Lover August 27th, 2004, 09:59 PM average! 6
David3820 August 29th, 2004, 03:31 AM Very cool and futuristic looking and looks very powerfull and mysterious. It's certainly my most favorite bold futuristic looking skyscraper. 10/10
jimm August 30th, 2004, 09:58 PM 7/10
Monkey September 25th, 2004, 06:20 PM Weird building. The design seems a bit clumsy ... the exterior looks like a radiator, or the inside of a machine. I don't really like it much.
6/10
andysimo123 November 12th, 2004, 01:46 AM That looks well mint. 9.5/10
Zuelas November 20th, 2004, 04:38 PM 5.5
It doesn't do much for me at all. The antenna is gaudy and the design is average at best. It does look like a suburban office tower- we have some just outside of Detroit that look better than this thing sadly. Great location but a lackluster bldg.
DamienK November 24th, 2004, 10:23 PM Nothing special. That antenna looks awkward perched on top too. 5.5/10
Þróndeimr February 25th, 2005, 12:13 AM 6.5/10
MattSal March 18th, 2005, 02:12 AM Has a Tokyo fell to it. I like that, so I'll give it a 7.5/10. :)
Medo April 8th, 2005, 07:53 PM ugliness personified, 4
get13 April 8th, 2005, 08:37 PM Nothing special, I don't like the spire. 7
Chibcha2k April 9th, 2005, 05:24 AM ..mmm nice 8/10
Pengui April 16th, 2005, 08:27 AM Industrial-looking, in a good way. High tech.
Overall quite impressive.
An 8.
Justadude April 17th, 2005, 11:13 PM Ugh, not a pretty design. The shape is just very strange. The spire takes away from the top of the building, and gills just don't make sense. Too many things going on here.
R@ptor May 20th, 2005, 02:52 AM Quite a strange design and the antenna ruins the design even more
5.0/10
Phobos May 20th, 2005, 11:45 PM 7/10
Not that bad...
Latoso May 28th, 2005, 12:14 AM 6.5/10
Henk May 28th, 2005, 12:16 AM 7.5/10.
Jules May 29th, 2005, 01:14 AM Bad in all aspects. 1.5.
geminiguy7 June 8th, 2005, 03:44 AM ok 7.5/10
SoboleuS June 8th, 2005, 02:02 PM It's interesting, looks like a giant handphone ;):D 8/10
Reflex June 10th, 2005, 03:34 AM 5.5/10.
DRAKKO June 10th, 2005, 04:43 AM 7/10
empersouf July 3rd, 2005, 02:29 PM 8.5 this one looks great.
samba_man July 4th, 2005, 05:38 AM Just Cool 6,5/10
malec July 5th, 2005, 12:21 AM 7.5
Quite nice but not really my favourite cup of tea.
ROYAL BLUE July 7th, 2005, 03:08 AM 9/10
CborG July 12th, 2005, 09:12 PM I don't like this one 6.5/10
EarlyBird July 14th, 2005, 06:42 PM I really don't like it. It's quite ugly. 4.5/10.
真琴 July 24th, 2005, 11:46 AM hehe````````8/10,i don`t like it ,though it is in China
MIKI July 24th, 2005, 11:47 AM 6.5/10
El_Greco August 9th, 2005, 09:56 PM nah..6/10
FJP September 1st, 2005, 11:01 PM The antenna it's horrible 6/10
pali September 3rd, 2005, 11:35 PM hha its ok 8!
Gerard October 6th, 2005, 11:55 AM height stories ratio is strange. very nice though. 8.5/10
deli October 13th, 2005, 03:32 PM very uncreative....almost deserve to becalled ugly.............5.5/10
Scorpionn October 14th, 2005, 05:43 AM 8/10
Accura4Matalan October 15th, 2005, 08:29 PM 6/10 :(
CPN October 16th, 2005, 06:29 PM nice looking tower 8.5/10
Indyman October 16th, 2005, 07:19 PM I love it except for that nasty looking scrap heap on the top posing as an antena. 8/10
wardrobes October 17th, 2005, 06:27 PM 5/10 I dont like it.
www.sercan.de October 23rd, 2005, 04:21 PM 5,5/10
Skylandman October 30th, 2005, 09:05 PM 5.5
۩SkyScraper۩ November 1st, 2005, 04:46 AM lil bit ugly :bash:
Sinjin P. November 2nd, 2005, 08:17 AM 9/10
Skyscraper indeed but when I saw the design, it kinda looks like a radio casette. :D
Cpbujaa November 3rd, 2005, 04:29 AM 7/10
Blue_Sky November 3rd, 2005, 12:57 PM Nice design 8.5/10
Mosaic November 3rd, 2005, 08:07 PM Look average,7/10
qzzq November 3rd, 2005, 11:59 PM 6.5 / 10
Dancer November 4th, 2005, 09:56 AM Thats kinda cool 7.5
forvine December 10th, 2005, 12:12 PM 6/10
flashlight December 15th, 2005, 09:37 PM 7/10 :)
SE9 December 19th, 2005, 05:49 PM 6.5/10
Cabman December 27th, 2005, 12:11 AM reminds me of a transistor radio 6/10
london-b December 28th, 2005, 01:28 AM 7/10
mr_storms December 30th, 2005, 09:24 PM cool design 7.5
warnings January 9th, 2006, 02:33 PM 6.5/10 :)
Scruffy88 January 10th, 2006, 04:10 PM This tower doesn't even break 700ft. But because of its swollen spire, looks more like an antenna to me, its number 41 besting out much better buildings like Singapore's big 3, Citicorp, and scotia plaza who get there honestly. 0/10. But im grading the building, not the cheating. its ugly. spire is ugly. it all needs to be fixed. 3/10
rxpilot February 25th, 2006, 07:59 AM Excellent facade, but the mast kills the sleekness.
sharpie20 March 4th, 2006, 06:11 AM 7/10 It looks like a two way radio with the flat box structure and the antena poking out the top.
marpa April 15th, 2006, 09:49 PM 8,5/10
clarky April 19th, 2006, 10:58 PM Nice scraper 8/10
anakin April 21st, 2006, 07:57 PM 6,5/10
LAYZIEDOGG June 4th, 2006, 02:04 AM not my style and the antenna is aweful 6/10
Woko June 4th, 2006, 08:21 PM the antena make me vote only 5.
ZZ-II June 13th, 2006, 12:10 PM it's ok, 7.5/10
mtt16 June 29th, 2006, 11:23 AM 7.5/10 not bad
virarch July 3rd, 2006, 11:28 PM 0/10
it's just too easy.
B@dGuYoM July 13th, 2006, 10:19 PM 5.5 looks not that tall
Erebus555 July 15th, 2006, 09:42 PM Looks like something I just ripped out my computer. 6/10
gutooo July 16th, 2006, 10:28 AM 8/10
mannix_10 July 27th, 2006, 08:19 AM 6/10
virarch July 30th, 2006, 07:35 PM The building looks worse than a 15-cent Chinese made cigarette lighter.
How can anyone rate it above 3.5???? on what ground???
Take a close look at the top - the ultra-ugly antenna, the useless, mindless vertical slabs of concrete, the cheap-looking facade, the incomprehensible choice of shape and contrast, ... it's clearly a brain dead design by an unqualified mainland Chinese "architect" in the school-dropout category by Western standards.
It's a 0/10 building.
Stop giving unjustified points.
Pastman July 30th, 2006, 07:52 PM 8/10
Dreamlıneя August 1st, 2006, 05:50 AM 7/10
richosob August 1st, 2006, 06:31 AM 1/10.
not really worth rating. the building looks like rubbish.
montesky August 2nd, 2006, 03:56 PM 8/10
Ohno August 4th, 2006, 02:40 AM 8.99999/10
Ohno August 4th, 2006, 02:41 AM 0/10
it's just too easy.
you are 0 brain too. :sleepy:
RON con soda August 8th, 2006, 02:45 PM For me it deserves 8/10
Liwwadden August 8th, 2006, 03:23 PM Not very special, 6.5/10.
chinatown August 8th, 2006, 04:25 PM pretty bland,and i hate the antenna-like spire,it's not fair for it to be accounted for the total height.The height of this building should be minus the spire!
5/10 for being cheated.
Ydlar August 11th, 2006, 12:52 PM 8/10..............love its glass facade
skipperBill August 13th, 2006, 11:13 PM 7/10.
cffuny August 16th, 2006, 10:44 PM 8/10
kamilo rxn August 19th, 2006, 05:08 AM sweet 8.5/10
Skyman October 1st, 2006, 09:49 AM 7/10
artech21 December 23rd, 2006, 04:08 PM 0 / 10
Pure garbage. Even the ugliest cigarette lighter would have looked decent compared to this one.
The architect is brain dead.
But then it's mainland China, where professional competence doesn't matter much as long as you're good at sneaking thru the backdoors.
MelboyPete December 23rd, 2006, 05:08 PM interesting...to say the least.
Kaiser December 23rd, 2006, 05:10 PM 5.5
FloridaFuture December 23rd, 2006, 05:14 PM the building is pretty good but the spire/antena is bad
6.5/10
vincent young December 29th, 2006, 03:45 PM I can't believe they built this one in Pudong where all buildings are supposed to be fanciful or at least trying to be.
Even a 3rd world country like China deserves better looking buildings than that.
1 / 10.
_zner_ January 9th, 2007, 08:35 AM 8.5 the building doesnt look that tall to me and its not that appealing.
newyorkrunaway1 January 9th, 2007, 08:38 AM rathe bland and mundane. you wouldnt notice this if you were just driving thru
frango1 January 26th, 2007, 09:48 PM 1/10
Reason: just take a closer look at the pics.
david thomas January 30th, 2007, 01:12 PM 0 / 10
I hope the architects had done it for free.
hans gruber January 31st, 2007, 01:10 PM 0 / 10
I hope the architects had done it for free.
You wish.
0 /10
xiaoluis January 31st, 2007, 01:35 PM not very nice, but the height its ok... so 6/10
imani February 2nd, 2007, 04:17 PM 1 / 10
I just don't see the point of this design.
jodie mitchell February 14th, 2007, 10:35 AM 0 / 10
SkyLerm February 14th, 2007, 05:11 PM Pretty ugly IMO 3 less...
sumting wong February 16th, 2007, 01:43 AM 0 / 10
I could have designed a much better looking building than this one, in less than 15 minutes.
Gators Rule February 16th, 2007, 08:13 AM 0 / 10
I could have designed a much better looking building than this one, in less than 15 minutes.
I could have done it in 10. :lol:
0 / 10
pau-chin March 1st, 2007, 01:40 PM http://img382.imageshack.us/img382/2347/02birdjpgd58cdd333d2346eh9.jpg
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9738/01txtjpg8798332dbc0f44fma7.jpg
8/10
Piotr-Stettin March 8th, 2007, 02:31 AM 8/10
[Jmlr] March 9th, 2007, 06:43 AM 8/10
redbrick March 11th, 2007, 08:21 PM 8,5/10 :cheers: nice tower !
Dallas star March 11th, 2007, 09:05 PM 10/10 simply splendid
Dallas star March 11th, 2007, 09:06 PM welcome to "SKYSCRAPER CITY" Red Brick...
Rizzato March 12th, 2007, 03:50 AM Id rather have a spire coming out of a building in the middle. nothing fancy.
also, buildings like jin mao, chrysler look very pleasing because the building slims down and fades into the spire.
This building just looks awkward to me. 6/10
W!CKED April 13th, 2007, 09:54 AM 8/10
Kelsen May 26th, 2007, 05:25 AM 8.5/10
Eureka! May 26th, 2007, 07:21 AM 7.5/10. Nice but nothing amazing. Not ugly.
VaastuShastra June 1st, 2007, 12:28 AM 7 - should be more futuristic.
cong san muon nam June 7th, 2007, 06:51 PM 8/10
Skyman June 9th, 2007, 11:30 AM 8/10
Gregorious June 10th, 2007, 03:06 PM 7/10
Miso July 14th, 2007, 09:40 AM 7/10
Richo July 15th, 2007, 03:54 AM Building is ok - 7/10, but the mast looks crap!!
Rem July 17th, 2007, 10:16 AM 6.5/10 looks a little weird to me.
Slodi August 17th, 2007, 01:56 PM i don't like the spire 7/10
LMCA1990 August 18th, 2007, 05:27 AM 7/10
pokistic September 12th, 2007, 08:13 AM 7.5/10
Astralis September 21st, 2007, 01:59 PM 7/10
MasonicStage™ September 24th, 2007, 01:28 PM 9/10
RON-E September 27th, 2007, 07:12 AM 7/10
isola-man October 14th, 2007, 02:45 AM 6.0
Rodrigo U. October 14th, 2007, 09:33 PM 3/10
BauIng October 14th, 2007, 10:10 PM 6/10
DragonAnime November 23rd, 2007, 06:59 PM Always liked this one- 8/10
kon133 November 23rd, 2007, 07:02 PM 3,5/10
skyscraperboy November 28th, 2007, 01:11 PM 6/10.
Nikkodemo December 28th, 2007, 03:58 AM Nice design!
8.5/10
Sound. December 29th, 2007, 08:34 AM 5.
IMPRESARIO January 20th, 2008, 03:16 PM Pretty ugly building...
Halabalooza February 24th, 2008, 08:40 AM doesnt look 282m.
7.
GOR@N April 11th, 2008, 11:46 AM 6/10
henry hill October 12th, 2008, 04:53 PM 9/10
tonyssa May 9th, 2009, 04:52 AM 5/10
Jan Del Castillo July 23rd, 2009, 09:11 PM 8. Good building. Regards.
xavarreiro September 2nd, 2009, 01:36 AM 8/10
Heroico March 12th, 2010, 12:45 AM 8.5/10
national guard May 8th, 2010, 08:39 AM imposing
8/10
dochan June 3rd, 2010, 11:22 AM 7/10
sieradzanin1 June 7th, 2010, 06:03 PM 7/10
romanito August 26th, 2010, 08:20 PM 9/10
romanito August 26th, 2010, 08:20 PM 9/10
Tomek 2008 August 29th, 2010, 03:46 PM 7/10
ikops September 8th, 2010, 12:20 PM Hmmm, well, a 7.5/10?
Vrooms September 9th, 2010, 08:32 AM 6.5. Comparing it other buildings in Shanghai it UGLY.
NorteN September 10th, 2010, 08:28 PM 7/10
Kulla September 18th, 2010, 06:15 PM 7/10
lukman143 September 30th, 2010, 10:25 AM 6/10 for this building
FlagshipV October 2nd, 2010, 10:33 AM 5/10.. Its ugly....................
Heidjer October 2nd, 2010, 04:06 PM Looks so much older than it is. 4.5/10
mecanico242 January 30th, 2011, 07:42 PM 9/10
krzewi January 31st, 2011, 11:44 AM 8/10
v-sun February 15th, 2011, 09:26 AM 7/10
mr.hanoi February 15th, 2011, 04:19 PM 7/10
yudibali2008 July 15th, 2011, 03:05 PM 8/10
mossimoh December 6th, 2011, 09:41 PM 8/10
Geocarlos January 14th, 2012, 12:15 AM 7/10
|
|