View Full Version : Pudong International Information Port l SHANGHAI l 211m l 40fl


D-Mac
November 24th, 2002, 09:47 AM
Pudong International Information Port
Shanghai, China

HEIGHT: 211m/692 feet ( antenna: 282m/926 feet )
FLOORS: 40 floors
COMPLETION: 2001
ARCHITECT: Nikken Sekkei

Shanghai Information Center is an intelligent building integrated with telecommunication, information and business, it is also a major part of the Shanghai Information Port. Located in Pudong Lujiazui Central Financial District, Shanghai Information Center with a total floor space of 101,235 square meters occupies a site area of 8,250 square meters, with 40 floors above the ground and 4 floors below ground level.

http://tinypic.com/5mtkl

http://tinypic.com/5mtna

http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/ROT/piip.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/skyscraperrot/158338.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v627/skyscraperrot/2941shanghai_dawn01.jpg

MiCH
November 24th, 2002, 12:50 PM
Nice looking building! I'd rate it 8/10.

RafflesCity
November 24th, 2002, 02:41 PM
7/10

That glass on the facade looks good. Reminds me a little of Commerzbank in Frankfurt.

Eddy
November 24th, 2002, 05:01 PM
Nice design 8.5/10

CG5
November 24th, 2002, 10:35 PM
My second fave in Shanghai. You have to see pics of the lobby to truly appreciate how cool this building is. Unfortunately, I don't have any.

10/10

De Snor
November 24th, 2002, 10:46 PM
Good , an 8

Sunflower
November 24th, 2002, 11:09 PM
great shape, great facade, great building :)

9.5/10

Liz L
November 25th, 2002, 12:44 AM
8/10 - Really reaches for the sky, and for once I'm not going to nitpick about setbacks! Nice, slim shape (even broad side on), and a good contrast between glass and stone on the facade. The spire seems to work well, too, though I'd like to see some shots from that side of the building...
I might have suggested a few setbacks between spire and tower, but it looks like the spire is the top of a structure on the other side, which might not need them...
The stone sections of the facade might benefit from a bit more detail...

SteelCity32
November 25th, 2002, 02:53 AM
it's ok. Don't care for the spire. 8/10

SUNNI
November 25th, 2002, 09:37 AM
7 for this... the size and shape dont match..

Bobdreamz
December 4th, 2002, 04:17 PM
this is oddly shaped & massed...looks like a smaller building is in front of it...and they could have done something more with the top instead of those 4 gills..at least stretch them all the way across the top!...no continuity at all...bleh...6.5/10..

Cliff
December 5th, 2002, 08:59 AM
7/10 no comments

skyway
December 14th, 2002, 10:01 AM
the rendering looks good

6/10

TYW
December 14th, 2002, 10:20 AM
7/10

not bad!!

DrumCorpsAlum
February 22nd, 2003, 10:15 PM
7.5/10. It's unique, and definately not plain, meaning that this building has different things to offer, and is not just one design. More than one thing do look at. I am rambling, but you know what I mean.

Wu-Gambino
February 23rd, 2003, 09:00 AM
6/10

Decent.

The Messiah
February 23rd, 2003, 07:03 PM
Well it's a nice tower.Hard to rate it.
A 7.0/10

Monkey
March 18th, 2003, 07:28 AM
O dear! Seems like someone tried to get rid of all his Scrabble letters in one move. :D A bit much going on here! I know, and I admit it: I'm usually the first to gripe about a plain, even fassade, but to me the various elements here somehow don't fit together very well, the whole building has something arbitrary about it.

A 6.

renell
March 18th, 2003, 10:49 AM
7/10.. don't like the glass, but generally its ok

Evergrey
April 11th, 2003, 04:18 AM
4 Pretty ugly building...

airsickpenthousedweller
April 16th, 2003, 09:06 PM
Shaped like something you'd expect to find inside some electronic device....

huaiwei
April 16th, 2003, 11:18 PM
Look at the second picture....its like Nokia build this as their headquaters complex...a huge handphone. :D Or maybe it looks more like a walkie-talkie?

Anyway 5/10 for being too "technical".

airsickpenthousedweller
April 17th, 2003, 11:08 PM
haha yes ! Maybe a good entry for this thread:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=35729

TropicalSQ744
May 4th, 2003, 12:07 PM
Pretty good scraper.. The spire looks like actually some work has been put into designing it.. But I must say the shape is a weird mix.. :rant:

7.5/10

rj2uman
May 21st, 2003, 06:37 AM
8/10 I like the Grey and the Glass.

New Jack City
July 31st, 2003, 11:48 PM
6/10...The building can't make up it's mind. It's overdetailed, they should have either used the glass facade or the stone facade. Weird shape too.

james2390
August 7th, 2003, 06:31 PM
8

AtlanticaC5
September 1st, 2003, 02:24 PM
It's OK, reminds me a bit of Reuters Building in NYC

7.5/10

SFtoBoise
September 1st, 2003, 09:47 PM
5.5/10

Patrick
September 7th, 2003, 07:23 PM
not my style


5

SeeMacau
September 12th, 2003, 08:56 AM
10/10

One of my favourite in Shanghai !!

Fabio
November 8th, 2003, 04:01 AM
8.5/10


Nice tower.

MCC
November 8th, 2003, 05:04 AM
8/10

manx_bkk
November 18th, 2003, 07:00 AM
7.5/10
Nice building but looks very thin. Don't like it so much.

baqthier
December 5th, 2003, 01:29 AM
6/10. And I never noticed this is as tall as 282m before!

7 World Trade
April 3rd, 2004, 04:56 AM
it has a revolutionary look, but i don't like how that antenna-like spire get to be counted as part of the building's height. without the spire thingey, it would of only been 211 m tall.

7.5/10

Trances
June 24th, 2004, 10:45 AM
dont realyl care for it 6/10

yoyo22
July 21st, 2004, 08:22 PM
5/10

A decidely average building. Looks like a suburban American building, something you would find outside of Detroit, for example, except a lot taller, but not tall enough to get any wow points. The design is a failed attempt at art, but when I see it I dont think its so bad. Still doesnt remind of a skyscraper, more like just a midrise, and not too interesting.

Dubai-Lover
August 27th, 2004, 09:59 PM
average! 6

David3820
August 29th, 2004, 03:31 AM
Very cool and futuristic looking and looks very powerfull and mysterious. It's certainly my most favorite bold futuristic looking skyscraper. 10/10

jimm
August 30th, 2004, 09:58 PM
7/10

Monkey
September 25th, 2004, 06:20 PM
Weird building. The design seems a bit clumsy ... the exterior looks like a radiator, or the inside of a machine. I don't really like it much.
6/10

andysimo123
November 12th, 2004, 01:46 AM
That looks well mint. 9.5/10

Zuelas
November 20th, 2004, 04:38 PM
5.5

It doesn't do much for me at all. The antenna is gaudy and the design is average at best. It does look like a suburban office tower- we have some just outside of Detroit that look better than this thing sadly. Great location but a lackluster bldg.

DamienK
November 24th, 2004, 10:23 PM
Nothing special. That antenna looks awkward perched on top too. 5.5/10

Þróndeimr
February 25th, 2005, 12:13 AM
6.5/10

MattSal
March 18th, 2005, 02:12 AM
Has a Tokyo fell to it. I like that, so I'll give it a 7.5/10. :)

Medo
April 8th, 2005, 07:53 PM
ugliness personified, 4

get13
April 8th, 2005, 08:37 PM
Nothing special, I don't like the spire. 7

Chibcha2k
April 9th, 2005, 05:24 AM
..mmm nice 8/10

Pengui
April 16th, 2005, 08:27 AM
Industrial-looking, in a good way. High tech.
Overall quite impressive.
An 8.

Justadude
April 17th, 2005, 11:13 PM
Ugh, not a pretty design. The shape is just very strange. The spire takes away from the top of the building, and gills just don't make sense. Too many things going on here.

R@ptor
May 20th, 2005, 02:52 AM
Quite a strange design and the antenna ruins the design even more

5.0/10

Phobos
May 20th, 2005, 11:45 PM
7/10

Not that bad...

Latoso
May 28th, 2005, 12:14 AM
6.5/10

Henk
May 28th, 2005, 12:16 AM
7.5/10.

Jules
May 29th, 2005, 01:14 AM
Bad in all aspects. 1.5.

geminiguy7
June 8th, 2005, 03:44 AM
ok 7.5/10

SoboleuS
June 8th, 2005, 02:02 PM
It's interesting, looks like a giant handphone ;):D 8/10

Reflex
June 10th, 2005, 03:34 AM
5.5/10.

DRAKKO
June 10th, 2005, 04:43 AM
7/10

empersouf
July 3rd, 2005, 02:29 PM
8.5 this one looks great.

samba_man
July 4th, 2005, 05:38 AM
Just Cool 6,5/10

malec
July 5th, 2005, 12:21 AM
7.5
Quite nice but not really my favourite cup of tea.

ROYAL BLUE
July 7th, 2005, 03:08 AM
9/10

CborG
July 12th, 2005, 09:12 PM
I don't like this one 6.5/10

EarlyBird
July 14th, 2005, 06:42 PM
I really don't like it. It's quite ugly. 4.5/10.

真琴
July 24th, 2005, 11:46 AM
hehe````````8/10,i don`t like it ,though it is in China

MIKI
July 24th, 2005, 11:47 AM
6.5/10

El_Greco
August 9th, 2005, 09:56 PM
nah..6/10

FJP
September 1st, 2005, 11:01 PM
The antenna it's horrible 6/10

pali
September 3rd, 2005, 11:35 PM
hha its ok 8!

Gerard
October 6th, 2005, 11:55 AM
height stories ratio is strange. very nice though. 8.5/10

deli
October 13th, 2005, 03:32 PM
very uncreative....almost deserve to becalled ugly.............5.5/10

Scorpionn
October 14th, 2005, 05:43 AM
8/10

Accura4Matalan
October 15th, 2005, 08:29 PM
6/10 :(

CPN
October 16th, 2005, 06:29 PM
nice looking tower 8.5/10

Indyman
October 16th, 2005, 07:19 PM
I love it except for that nasty looking scrap heap on the top posing as an antena. 8/10

wardrobes
October 17th, 2005, 06:27 PM
5/10 I dont like it.

www.sercan.de
October 23rd, 2005, 04:21 PM
5,5/10

Skylandman
October 30th, 2005, 09:05 PM
5.5

۩SkyScraper۩
November 1st, 2005, 04:46 AM
lil bit ugly :bash:

Sinjin P.
November 2nd, 2005, 08:17 AM
9/10
Skyscraper indeed but when I saw the design, it kinda looks like a radio casette. :D

Cpbujaa
November 3rd, 2005, 04:29 AM
7/10

Blue_Sky
November 3rd, 2005, 12:57 PM
Nice design 8.5/10

Mosaic
November 3rd, 2005, 08:07 PM
Look average,7/10

qzzq
November 3rd, 2005, 11:59 PM
6.5 / 10

Dancer
November 4th, 2005, 09:56 AM
Thats kinda cool 7.5

forvine
December 10th, 2005, 12:12 PM
6/10

flashlight
December 15th, 2005, 09:37 PM
7/10 :)

SE9
December 19th, 2005, 05:49 PM
6.5/10

Cabman
December 27th, 2005, 12:11 AM
reminds me of a transistor radio 6/10

london-b
December 28th, 2005, 01:28 AM
7/10

mr_storms
December 30th, 2005, 09:24 PM
cool design 7.5

warnings
January 9th, 2006, 02:33 PM
6.5/10 :)

Scruffy88
January 10th, 2006, 04:10 PM
This tower doesn't even break 700ft. But because of its swollen spire, looks more like an antenna to me, its number 41 besting out much better buildings like Singapore's big 3, Citicorp, and scotia plaza who get there honestly. 0/10. But im grading the building, not the cheating. its ugly. spire is ugly. it all needs to be fixed. 3/10

rxpilot
February 25th, 2006, 07:59 AM
Excellent facade, but the mast kills the sleekness.

sharpie20
March 4th, 2006, 06:11 AM
7/10 It looks like a two way radio with the flat box structure and the antena poking out the top.

marpa
April 15th, 2006, 09:49 PM
8,5/10

clarky
April 19th, 2006, 10:58 PM
Nice scraper 8/10

anakin
April 21st, 2006, 07:57 PM
6,5/10

LAYZIEDOGG
June 4th, 2006, 02:04 AM
not my style and the antenna is aweful 6/10

Woko
June 4th, 2006, 08:21 PM
the antena make me vote only 5.

ZZ-II
June 13th, 2006, 12:10 PM
it's ok, 7.5/10

mtt16
June 29th, 2006, 11:23 AM
7.5/10 not bad

virarch
July 3rd, 2006, 11:28 PM
0/10

it's just too easy.

B@dGuYoM
July 13th, 2006, 10:19 PM
5.5 looks not that tall

Erebus555
July 15th, 2006, 09:42 PM
Looks like something I just ripped out my computer. 6/10

gutooo
July 16th, 2006, 10:28 AM
8/10

mannix_10
July 27th, 2006, 08:19 AM
6/10

virarch
July 30th, 2006, 07:35 PM
The building looks worse than a 15-cent Chinese made cigarette lighter.

How can anyone rate it above 3.5???? on what ground???

Take a close look at the top - the ultra-ugly antenna, the useless, mindless vertical slabs of concrete, the cheap-looking facade, the incomprehensible choice of shape and contrast, ... it's clearly a brain dead design by an unqualified mainland Chinese "architect" in the school-dropout category by Western standards.

It's a 0/10 building.

Stop giving unjustified points.

Pastman
July 30th, 2006, 07:52 PM
8/10

Dreamlıneя
August 1st, 2006, 05:50 AM
7/10

richosob
August 1st, 2006, 06:31 AM
1/10.

not really worth rating. the building looks like rubbish.

montesky
August 2nd, 2006, 03:56 PM
8/10

Ohno
August 4th, 2006, 02:40 AM
8.99999/10

Ohno
August 4th, 2006, 02:41 AM
0/10

it's just too easy.
you are 0 brain too. :sleepy:

RON con soda
August 8th, 2006, 02:45 PM
For me it deserves 8/10

Liwwadden
August 8th, 2006, 03:23 PM
Not very special, 6.5/10.

chinatown
August 8th, 2006, 04:25 PM
pretty bland,and i hate the antenna-like spire,it's not fair for it to be accounted for the total height.The height of this building should be minus the spire!
5/10 for being cheated.

Ydlar
August 11th, 2006, 12:52 PM
8/10..............love its glass facade

skipperBill
August 13th, 2006, 11:13 PM
7/10.

cffuny
August 16th, 2006, 10:44 PM
8/10

kamilo rxn
August 19th, 2006, 05:08 AM
sweet 8.5/10

Skyman
October 1st, 2006, 09:49 AM
7/10

artech21
December 23rd, 2006, 04:08 PM
0 / 10

Pure garbage. Even the ugliest cigarette lighter would have looked decent compared to this one.

The architect is brain dead.

But then it's mainland China, where professional competence doesn't matter much as long as you're good at sneaking thru the backdoors.

MelboyPete
December 23rd, 2006, 05:08 PM
interesting...to say the least.

Kaiser
December 23rd, 2006, 05:10 PM
5.5

FloridaFuture
December 23rd, 2006, 05:14 PM
the building is pretty good but the spire/antena is bad
6.5/10

vincent young
December 29th, 2006, 03:45 PM
I can't believe they built this one in Pudong where all buildings are supposed to be fanciful or at least trying to be.

Even a 3rd world country like China deserves better looking buildings than that.

1 / 10.

_zner_
January 9th, 2007, 08:35 AM
8.5 the building doesnt look that tall to me and its not that appealing.

newyorkrunaway1
January 9th, 2007, 08:38 AM
rathe bland and mundane. you wouldnt notice this if you were just driving thru

frango1
January 26th, 2007, 09:48 PM
1/10

Reason: just take a closer look at the pics.

david thomas
January 30th, 2007, 01:12 PM
0 / 10

I hope the architects had done it for free.

hans gruber
January 31st, 2007, 01:10 PM
0 / 10

I hope the architects had done it for free.

You wish.

0 /10

xiaoluis
January 31st, 2007, 01:35 PM
not very nice, but the height its ok... so 6/10

imani
February 2nd, 2007, 04:17 PM
1 / 10

I just don't see the point of this design.

jodie mitchell
February 14th, 2007, 10:35 AM
0 / 10

SkyLerm
February 14th, 2007, 05:11 PM
Pretty ugly IMO 3 less...

sumting wong
February 16th, 2007, 01:43 AM
0 / 10

I could have designed a much better looking building than this one, in less than 15 minutes.

Gators Rule
February 16th, 2007, 08:13 AM
0 / 10

I could have designed a much better looking building than this one, in less than 15 minutes.

I could have done it in 10. :lol:

0 / 10

pau-chin
March 1st, 2007, 01:40 PM
http://img382.imageshack.us/img382/2347/02birdjpgd58cdd333d2346eh9.jpg
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9738/01txtjpg8798332dbc0f44fma7.jpg

8/10

Piotr-Stettin
March 8th, 2007, 02:31 AM
8/10

[Jmlr]
March 9th, 2007, 06:43 AM
8/10

redbrick
March 11th, 2007, 08:21 PM
8,5/10 :cheers: nice tower !

Dallas star
March 11th, 2007, 09:05 PM
10/10 simply splendid

Dallas star
March 11th, 2007, 09:06 PM
welcome to "SKYSCRAPER CITY" Red Brick...

Rizzato
March 12th, 2007, 03:50 AM
Id rather have a spire coming out of a building in the middle. nothing fancy.
also, buildings like jin mao, chrysler look very pleasing because the building slims down and fades into the spire.
This building just looks awkward to me. 6/10

W!CKED
April 13th, 2007, 09:54 AM
8/10

Kelsen
May 26th, 2007, 05:25 AM
8.5/10

Eureka!
May 26th, 2007, 07:21 AM
7.5/10. Nice but nothing amazing. Not ugly.

VaastuShastra
June 1st, 2007, 12:28 AM
7 - should be more futuristic.

cong san muon nam
June 7th, 2007, 06:51 PM
8/10

Skyman
June 9th, 2007, 11:30 AM
8/10

Gregorious
June 10th, 2007, 03:06 PM
7/10

Miso
July 14th, 2007, 09:40 AM
7/10

Richo
July 15th, 2007, 03:54 AM
Building is ok - 7/10, but the mast looks crap!!

Rem
July 17th, 2007, 10:16 AM
6.5/10 looks a little weird to me.

Slodi
August 17th, 2007, 01:56 PM
i don't like the spire 7/10

LMCA1990
August 18th, 2007, 05:27 AM
7/10

pokistic
September 12th, 2007, 08:13 AM
7.5/10

Astralis
September 21st, 2007, 01:59 PM
7/10

MasonicStage™
September 24th, 2007, 01:28 PM
9/10

RON-E
September 27th, 2007, 07:12 AM
7/10

isola-man
October 14th, 2007, 02:45 AM
6.0

Rodrigo U.
October 14th, 2007, 09:33 PM
3/10

BauIng
October 14th, 2007, 10:10 PM
6/10

DragonAnime
November 23rd, 2007, 06:59 PM
Always liked this one- 8/10

kon133
November 23rd, 2007, 07:02 PM
3,5/10

skyscraperboy
November 28th, 2007, 01:11 PM
6/10.

Nikkodemo
December 28th, 2007, 03:58 AM
Nice design!

8.5/10

Sound.
December 29th, 2007, 08:34 AM
5.

IMPRESARIO
January 20th, 2008, 03:16 PM
Pretty ugly building...

Halabalooza
February 24th, 2008, 08:40 AM
doesnt look 282m.
7.

GOR@N
April 11th, 2008, 11:46 AM
6/10

henry hill
October 12th, 2008, 04:53 PM
9/10

tonyssa
May 9th, 2009, 04:52 AM
5/10

Jan Del Castillo
July 23rd, 2009, 09:11 PM
8. Good building. Regards.

xavarreiro
September 2nd, 2009, 01:36 AM
8/10

Heroico
March 12th, 2010, 12:45 AM
8.5/10

national guard
May 8th, 2010, 08:39 AM
imposing
8/10

dochan
June 3rd, 2010, 11:22 AM
7/10

sieradzanin1
June 7th, 2010, 06:03 PM
7/10

romanito
August 26th, 2010, 08:20 PM
9/10

romanito
August 26th, 2010, 08:20 PM
9/10

Tomek 2008
August 29th, 2010, 03:46 PM
7/10

ikops
September 8th, 2010, 12:20 PM
Hmmm, well, a 7.5/10?

Vrooms
September 9th, 2010, 08:32 AM
6.5. Comparing it other buildings in Shanghai it UGLY.

NorteN
September 10th, 2010, 08:28 PM
7/10

Kulla
September 18th, 2010, 06:15 PM
7/10

lukman143
September 30th, 2010, 10:25 AM
6/10 for this building

FlagshipV
October 2nd, 2010, 10:33 AM
5/10.. Its ugly....................

Heidjer
October 2nd, 2010, 04:06 PM
Looks so much older than it is. 4.5/10

mecanico242
January 30th, 2011, 07:42 PM
9/10

krzewi
January 31st, 2011, 11:44 AM
8/10

v-sun
February 15th, 2011, 09:26 AM
7/10

mr.hanoi
February 15th, 2011, 04:19 PM
7/10

yudibali2008
July 15th, 2011, 03:05 PM
8/10

mossimoh
December 6th, 2011, 09:41 PM
8/10

Geocarlos
January 14th, 2012, 12:15 AM
7/10