preme3000
March 17th, 2011, 01:28 AM
Wanted to discuss the possble outcomes of such action. I have been one of the biggest advocates of such action since I was a child up until now I still feel it is the only choice in gaining our true independence. Freedom or death, but how willing how we or am I if I am sitting thousands of miles away from home on the computer?
What are the possible outcomes? What are the pros and cons? Is the ground ripe for such action? Are the people ready to fight? Are the diaspora ready to go back and lend a hand or finance things from abroad? Which countries will be for and against a change of structure?
The pros;
1) It has got to the stage where there is almost nothing to lose anymore, people will only be oppressed for so long before they take matters into their own hands
2) New start, like when Kabila Snr took power there was new hope, the country was starting to get more organised. Country actually became more united and plans were in place to organise the army.
3) Any change has go to be better than no change from this current disgusting situation, a sick sense of so called "democracy" where votes and alliances were bought
The cons against such action as far as the DRC is concerned in my opionion are as follows;
1) DRC lacks strong established institutions or even just one strong enough institution that can hold the country together. Using the example of Egypt, the army were able to quickly step in and play a stabilising factor during the whole chaos period and maintain the intergrity of the territorry from potential rebel groups forming.
2) Lack of obvious leaders - although there are many very capable Congolese doing great things around the world such as doctors all around southern Africa, it appears that there is a lack of real leaders within DRC itself and those that have it lack the opportunities to exploit their talents. Every revolution needs direction and without leadership, a potential revolution could transform into an all out civil war.
3) Neighbouring countries may see this as another opportunity to step in and control some more startegic territorry.
4)A revolution could create too big a power vacuum that the country could split into sections although part of the country is ungovernable the country at present is at least stable in most parts.
Can't really think of anything else but wanted to create a debate.
What are the possible outcomes? What are the pros and cons? Is the ground ripe for such action? Are the people ready to fight? Are the diaspora ready to go back and lend a hand or finance things from abroad? Which countries will be for and against a change of structure?
The pros;
1) It has got to the stage where there is almost nothing to lose anymore, people will only be oppressed for so long before they take matters into their own hands
2) New start, like when Kabila Snr took power there was new hope, the country was starting to get more organised. Country actually became more united and plans were in place to organise the army.
3) Any change has go to be better than no change from this current disgusting situation, a sick sense of so called "democracy" where votes and alliances were bought
The cons against such action as far as the DRC is concerned in my opionion are as follows;
1) DRC lacks strong established institutions or even just one strong enough institution that can hold the country together. Using the example of Egypt, the army were able to quickly step in and play a stabilising factor during the whole chaos period and maintain the intergrity of the territorry from potential rebel groups forming.
2) Lack of obvious leaders - although there are many very capable Congolese doing great things around the world such as doctors all around southern Africa, it appears that there is a lack of real leaders within DRC itself and those that have it lack the opportunities to exploit their talents. Every revolution needs direction and without leadership, a potential revolution could transform into an all out civil war.
3) Neighbouring countries may see this as another opportunity to step in and control some more startegic territorry.
4)A revolution could create too big a power vacuum that the country could split into sections although part of the country is ungovernable the country at present is at least stable in most parts.
Can't really think of anything else but wanted to create a debate.