View Full Version : Anyone remember Libeskind's book?


Izeklah
September 30th, 2004, 08:43 AM
Apparently it's out:


Buildings, personalities deconstructed in new book by WTC architect Libeskind

By KAREN MATTHEWS
Associated Press Writer

September 29, 2004, 5:37 PM EDT

NEW YORK -- Daniel Libeskind became one of the world's best-known architects when his emotionally charged plan for the World Trade Center site was chosen.

Then, according to most versions, he was shunted aside when the developer brought in his own architect to redesign Libeskind's signature Freedom Tower.

Libeskind doesn't see it that way. His version, that his ground zero plan has largely survived a painful process of compromise and collaboration, is laid out in a new book that also chronicles the harrowing lives of his immigrant parents and his own circuitous route to architecture's top ranks.

The book, "Breaking Ground: Adventures in Life and Architecture," offers a discourse on architecture: Libeskind compares it to music and choreography but quotes Philip Johnson as saying "all architects are prostitutes."

It also is the story of a remarkable marriage and business partnership between Libeskind and his wife, Nina, whom he met at a Yiddish summer camp when he was 20 and she was 17 and he thought she was "so beautiful she must be stupid." And it's a chance to settle scores with trade center leaseholder Larry Silverstein and his architect, David Childs, and with others.

Libeskind, though, was upbeat and relatively diplomatic in an interview in his firm's lower Manhattan office. As always, he wore black except for an American flag lapel pin and spoke in a rushed staccato.

"People often criticize me," he said. "I compromised here and I negotiated there. ... But I believe in it.

"You have to be flexible, you have to be able to accommodate future needs ... but at the same time, you have to create a plan that has integrity and strength and that can withstand all these changes."

Libeskind, 58, devotes a chapter of "Breaking Ground" to his "forced marriage" to Childs and his firm, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill. Relations between SOM and Studio Daniel Libeskind became so strained, he said, that the situation "recalled the orchestrated arrangements between North and South Korea at the very tense border at Panmunjom."

An SOM spokeswoman, Elizabeth Kubany, responded: "Every creative process has its tensions, and this one was no different. But we do not feel we can waste any time or energy rehashing grievances about the process."

Libeskind writes that Silverstein had "uncompromising demands for yet more office space without regard for the public plazas, parks, memorials, and streets of the master plan."

Howard Rubenstein, a spokesman for Silverstein, said, "With so many different stake-holders, it certainly was a challenging process to arrive at the Freedom Tower design. But the result is spectacular. We regret that Daniel Libeskind feels the need to attack so many of the participants in that effort."

When the cornerstone for the Freedom Tower was laid July 4, its symbolic height of 1,776 feet remained _ after an epic battle that, according to "Breaking Ground," required the intervention of New York Gov. George Pataki. But the building's design was a compromise that some critics called the worst of both worlds.

"People have different opinions," Libeskind said, "but I think it's a great design and I think when it's built, people will forget the squabbles."

Libeskind's plan for the trade center site was chosen by the Lower Manhattan Development Corp., a city-state agency created to rebuild downtown after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, in a drawn-out and highly public process.

He tells unflattering stories about several of the other architects who submitted schemes.

Peter Eisenman, part of a team that included Richard Meier and Charles Gwathmey, had been Libeskind's teacher at Cooper Union. When he showed up at the institute, Libeskind writes, Eisenman "handed me a broom and told me to sweep the office. It was a demeaning initiation, a forced act of submission."

Eisenman remembers it differently, said his spokeswoman, Cynthia Davidson.

"When Danny showed up on the first day of the institute opening in the fall, Peter was sweeping the floor and he welcomed Danny and said, 'We're all cleaning up now, why don't you take this broom and I'll take another one,"' she said. "He refused."

Frederic Schwartz, a member of the THINK team whose design was the runner-up to Libeskind's, is described grabbing Libeskind by the collar at the Venice Biennale, shaking him and growling, "I'm a New Yorker, damn it! Don't tell me how to build my city!"

Schwartz called the account "inaccurate and defamatory."

"I never grabbed his collar and I never shook him," Schwartz said in an e-mail. "I don't use the word 'damn' or 'damn it."'

Asked about the attacks on his rivals, Libeskind said, "Life is not just about heroes, it's also about villains. ... I think it gives people the idea that architecture is flesh and blood, it is not just creating some sort of machine for living. ... It involves struggles which are not only intellectual but emotional and often spiritual."


Copyright © 2004, The Associated Press

New Jack City
September 30th, 2004, 03:17 PM
Anyone plan to buy it?

The cover:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1573222925.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Description:

The renowned architect introduces his iconoclastic approach to public space and shares his vision for the most important architectural project of our time, the 1776 Freedom Tower at the World Trade Center site.

Drawing on his uncommon background and global perspective, in Breaking Ground Daniel Libeskind explores ideas about tragedy and hope, and the way in which architecture can memorialize-and reshape-human experience.

Born in 1946 to Holocaust survivors in Poland, Daniel Libeskind eventually emigrated to New York City in 1959. A virtuoso musician before studying architecture, Libeskind has designed iconic buildings around the world, including the Jewish Museum Berlin and the Imperial War Museum in Manchester, England. In February 2003, Libeskind was chosen as the Master Plan Architect for the World Trade Center reconstruction.

Full of the vitality, humor, and visionary spark that helped win him the Trade Center Commission, Breaking Ground invites readers to see architecture-and the larger world-through new perspectives.

It's around $20 at Amazon.

It already appears that Libeskind doesn't have his facts straight after reading this article, this book is gonna be as credible as his BS speeches.

Jan
September 30th, 2004, 07:53 PM
Thanks for the info! I think it's very good to read 'the other guy's' point of view. For now my opinion of mr. Liebeskind makes him out to be a bit of a looser in this process, so I wonder what his story is, wether he has his facts straight or not. I'm going to order this one for sure.

Izeklah
September 30th, 2004, 10:24 PM
I might take a look at it to see what he says on the rebuilding process, but I'm not particularly enthusiastic about giving Libeskind my money.

Ellatur
October 1st, 2004, 12:37 AM
psssh...

STR
October 1st, 2004, 01:04 AM
Life is not just about heroes, it's also about villains. ... I think it gives people the idea that architecture is flesh and blood, it is not just creating some sort of machine for living. ... It involves struggles which are not only intellectual but emotional and often spiritual."

I am still amazed how much sh*t that little man is full of.

Izeklah
October 1st, 2004, 02:30 AM
Here's another article on the book:


http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/news/story/0,11711,1317187,00.html

The battle of Ground Zero spills into print

Architect tells of feuding with rivals over twin towers site

Oliver Burkeman in New York
Friday October 1, 2004
The Guardian

The architect who won the competition to rebuild on New York's Ground Zero has revealed how the process degenerated into bitter feuds and childish squabbles among rival designers - though he rejects the notion that the new plan for the site is an uninspiring compromise.
In a candid new book, Breaking Ground, Daniel Libeskind recounts what he calls his "forced marriage" to David Childs, the favoured architect of the World Trade Centre site's developer, Larry Silverstein.

He portrays Mr Childs as patronising and overbearing, and intent on eliminating as much of Mr Libeskind's vision as possible from the eventual design. Relations between the two architectural practices were so fraught that they "recalled the orchestrated arrangements between North and South Korea at the very tense border at Panmunjom".

Since winning the competition last year, Mr Libeskind, designer of the Jewish Museum in Berlin, has been fighting to preserve what he can of his original concept, which had as its centrepiece a Freedom Tower, 1,776 feet high, to represent the date of the American declaration of independence. That symbolic height has been maintained, and the tower's cornerstone was laid in July.

But much of the rest of the design has been heavily modified to meet Mr Silverstein's "uncompromising demands for yet more office space without regard for the public plazas, parks, memorials and streets of the master plan", as Mr Libeskind puts it.

Mr Childs's company, Skidmore Owings and Merrill (SOM), was hired directly by the developer - who told reporters he had an "absolute right to choose the architects" - while Mr Libeskind won the prize from the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation.

The consequent working relationship, Mr Libeskind writes, was often "downright nuts". He claims that no representative from his company was allowed to enter SOM's offices unless someone of equivalent seniority was present, and that for the majority of the time during their weekly meetings, Mr Childs would "chatter on about where he'd just been or would lecture me on architecture".

"He gave me the patronising look reserved for the village idiot," he notes on another occasion, describing it as "weird to inhabit David Childs's universe, where everybody knew his or her prescribed place ... Childs wasn't interested in what we were working on; he was proceeding with plans for the building he had proposed to Larry Silverstein many months before."

The process was only kept on track at all, he says, because of the forceful intervention of George Pataki, the governor of New York state.

The collaboration was undoubtedly a clash of cultures between the black-suited European architect, poetic and sometimes baffling in his pronouncements about the site, and the no-nonsense American commercial designer.

Elizabeth Kubany, from Mr Childs's company, said Mr Libeskind's account was highly partisan. "We're not going to respond to it point by point," she said. "Certainly there are many things in it that are half true. We have a building that we're trying to build, so all of this time spent talking about the process seems counterproductive to us."

A spokesman for Mr Silverstein called the plans for the site "spectacular", adding: "We regret that Daniel Libeskind feels the need to attack so many of the participants in that effort."

Mr Libeskind seemed more conciliatory yesterday. "I compromised here and I negotiated there ... but I believe in [the project]," he told the Associated Press news agency. "You have to be flexible. You have to be able to accommodate future needs. At the same time, you have to create a plan that has integrity and strength and that can withstand all these changes. I think when it's built, people will forget the squabbles."

That perspective is far from unanimously shared among design experts. "It's like that old cliche about a camel being a horse designed by a committee," said Paul Goldberger, the New Yorker magazine's architectural critic. "We now have the camel of skyscrapers. Do you ask Matisse and Dalí to collaborate on painting a picture together? No."