#180 l Empire Tower l KUALA LUMPUR l 238m l 60fl

[baqthier]

Empire Tower
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

HEIGHT: 238m/781 feet
FLOORS: 60 floors
COMPLETION: 1994
ARCHITECT: ?

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/rotpics01/empiretower01.jpeg

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/rotpics01/empiretower02.jpeg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/9emp1.jpg

[baqthier]

View in skyline

http://pro.corbis.com/images/watermark/67/14229200/CSM105624.jpg

[SteelCity32]

kuala lumpur has a great skyline.


this one is ok 6.5/10

[AG]

Tha facade is alright, but the building altogether is too plain.

6/10

[Pablo]

wow 9/10 ;)

[SUNNI]

so-so design, so-so coulours
7..

[ryanr]

Looks good...Fits well in the skyline:)
8/10

[DamienK]

Nice colour scheme. . .the base needs work though
8/10

[Caledon1981]

looks like a pretty sweet tower .. i like the repetition of the "balcony" windows .. 8/10

[Sunflower]

fairly plain but not too bad.

6.5/10

[TYW]

9/10

I like it!
any night pics of it??

[RafflesCity]

7.5/10

Decent looking but a bit bland.

[kiku99]

Looks pretty cool. 7/10

[heirloom]

5.5/10

looks pretty shabby for a tower built in the 90's... the lacy stuff at the bottom of the tower and the bland and untiled facade makes the building look as if it were built in the 60's, when asia was still poor...

[Bob di Gills]

not that bad

6/10

[renell]

Forgot what I gave it. Its a bit plain but i like it.

[Daniel8ty8]

Not a bad building. More like something you'd find in Atlantic City, but taller...

6.5

[Kevinkhoo1986]

8.5 for me!!~ :angel1:

[Liz L]

The slim shape of the tower gives it good height, though it might look a bit stocky broadside on...The facade is not bad, but it's a bit bland, and the base, IMO, is dull and blocky - 7.5/10
It could use a few setbacks, and some more detailing on the facade.

[SeeMacau]

I like it!!
9/10

[Wu-Gambino]

7/10

It's plain, but at least the tower makes some attempt to look good.

[1+2=3]

6/10

[De Snor]

nothing special to me

[baqthier]

http://picserver.student.utwente.nl/getpicture.php?id=86234

http://picserver.student.utwente.nl/getpicture.php?id=86235

[Grollo]

This was built in 1994? Looks more like 1984 :-) A bit too heavy looking, but ok

6/10

[Evergrey]

6 A bit too plain... and I don't like the thin sides

[Jase Calvin]

The facade is quite nice, and is the building overall is elegant. 7/10.

[BGT]

8.5/10

[huaiwei]

It gave me an impression its a hotel.....due to those windows...the style used looks quite outdated already...7/10.

[weirdo]

it's so tall. not a good building by itself. makes the skyline more dramatic though. 6/10

[james2390]

7.5

[AtlanticaC5]

6.5/10

[The Messiah]

Looks a bit cheap :) 6.5/10

[RafflesCity]

A picture taken by szehoong
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/9dscn5555sm.jpg

[airsickpenthousedweller]

Good dimensions, nice in detail, somewhat unspectacular design, but the height makes up for that.

7.5/10

[Patrick]

facade: ok
form: ok
points: 7.5

[Javier]

Hummmm, ok:

8/10

[Primo]

I like cose is tall, but it doesn´t have anything interesting 7.5/10

[Fabio]

8/10


it looks ok

[baqthier]

2 pics by me

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/9emp_1.jpg
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/9emp_2.jpg

[baqthier]

Pic by Patrick Beckers

http://www.skyscraperpicture.com/kl058.jpg

[Winus]

A nice slender tower. 7

[Wisma]

6/10

[Venezuelacom]

i only like it's height 6/10

[Chibcha2k]

its cool....9/10

[rayman]

5 , doesnt look that breathtaking to me

[7 World Trade]

need some more bulk and more windows on this one.

7

[TYW]

from jalan tun razak
http://gallery.cybertarp.com/albums/userpics/14426/Empire%20Tower%20(1).jpg

other forumer's pic
http://img38.photobucket.com/albums/v116/zahirnya/100_0062.jpg

[Imperfect Ending]

7/10

I don't like the white sides

[Schroedinger's Cat]

6.5/10

[Trances]

to dull not my style
5/10
just looks liek giant dark cement render
the curved windows to add some feature but not enough 2 save it

[Monkey]

Very tall and slim, but rather plain.

7/10

[empersouf]

This is a tall/slim building, I like it. 8.5.

[andysimo123]

7/10

[Zuelas]

6

Nothing special. Fits in well in KL.

[Medo]

4/10 not to my liking I'm afraid

[MattSal]

Nice building. The white facade, however, seems slightly off. I give it a 7.5/10.

[Pengui]

Very nice height impression, even on the broad side. Good proportions. Otherwise, a bit outdated. Not one of KL's best.
6.

[benjaminK9]

I love this tower. 9/10

[superskyline]

I dont liek it much
6/10

[Phobos]

6.5/10
Not a great design,especially when you see the side parts of the building.

[Potassium Boy]

Average building, 6.5/10

[DRAKKO]

5/10

[Latoso]

7/10

[Jules]

Sleek. 7.5.

[ROYAL BLUE]

6/10

[Reflex]

6.5/10.

[CborG]

Looks tacky for it's age, 6.5/10

[SoboleuS]

Average design, but at least it's tall and slim ;) 7/10

[El_Greco]

7/10

[1984 D.F.]

6/10

[pali]

love it.

[Skylandman]

3 or less

[www.sercan.de]

6,5/10

[Blue_Sky]

7.5/10

[reignman]

good-looking: 8/10

[۩SkyScraper۩]

9/10:okay:

[allan_dude]

5.5/10

looks ordinary for an asian skyscraper

[forvine]

5.5/10 looks very old

[Principes]

OK 7/10.

[Sinjin P.]

9.5/10

[mr_storms]

bland 6.5/10

[Scruffy88]

It is simple but the slimness makes it look real tall.
7.5/10

[FROM LOS ANGELES]

Slim and tall nice combination. Good desing also. 7.5/10

[jimm]

6/10

[LordMarshall]

7/10

[warnings]

8/10 its average tower

[Harkeb]

7.

[ChiLooper]

Ugh 6/10

[Moren-o]

I really has a vertical feeling when looking from the side. But it just looks too cheap and plain.
7/10

[kiwioperatr]

ok i giv 7

[chinatown]

average
7/10

[marpa]

4/10

[clarky]

9/10

[Greg]

9.5/10 a KL classic :)

[Skyman]

average
7/10

[Henk]

6/10.

[anakin]

7/10

[Accura4Matalan]

Looks good from back and front, crap when viewed side on. 6/10

[ZZ-II]

good tower, 8.5/10

[virarch]

4.5/10

[gutooo]

7/10

[Mosaic]

5/10

[Cabman]

dull uninspiring 5.5/10

[delmaule]

6/10

[skipperBill]

6.5/10.

[Very Controversial]

7/10. Okay.

[Dreamlıneя]

6/10

[kirby21]

6.5 / 10

[_zner_]

6 :ohno:

[Chinky Orz]

7.5/10 Not loving it, not hating it.

[myf282828]

http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/7118/a2006123vs7.jpg

[futureproof]

looks very tall, and it´s the best one in the sorrounding area.

7

[LAYZIEDOGG]

not that great ,very slim though 6/10

[artech21]

4.5 / 10

It would have looked much better with a uniform glass facade and clean top.

[skyscraperboy]

too plain.. but some how i like it....

[sharpie20]

6/10

Blends in well with the rest of the skyline, but it doesn't stand out, except for it's height.

[kamil.bukowski]

5.5/10

[BangkokCan]

7 bad design but quite tall

[mtt16]

7.5/10 for its tall

[FloridaFuture]

Very skinny, almost like it will fall over.
6.5/10

[W!CKED]

7/10

[Crizzy]

8,5/10

[Ralphkke]

Nah not my style, a 6 out of 10.

[cong san muon nam]

5/10

[Aliya]

6.5/10

[myf282828]

http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/670/dsc01339ow7.jpg

[Kelsen]

6.5/10

[Piotr-Stettin]

6.5/10

[Peter Parker]

It is good, But could be better.........!:banana:






Peter Parker :)
http://effectsofpheromones.supersized.org/

[LMCA1990]

8/10

[Sound.]

yeah, i like

8/10

[krull]

7/10

[Slodi]

nothing special 6/10

[eastwest]

7/10
Nice front view, but too thin :cheers:

[Astralis]

7/10

[newyorkrunaway1]

1/10

[MasonicStage™]

looks like a chimney :lol: ... 4,5/10

[RON-E]

3/10

[kon133]

4/10

[krzewi]

6/10

[IMPRESARIO]

yucky! 3.

[Halabalooza]

6. its bit communist ahha

[roen]

6/10

[davee08]

7/10

[Ni3lS]

9/10

[Fundador]

not bad 7/10

[GOR@N]

5/10

[Nikkodemo]

Interesting shape, looks nice!!

8/10

[henry hill]

7/10

[Rutger1991]

6/10

[Kawasaki KG]

5.5/10

[briker]

6/

[DinamiT]

I like it...

9/10

[A_Voz_Da_Figueira]

8/10

[nazrey]

by Dirk Severijnse

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3162/3038792397_9da558e341_b.jpg

by mY jOuRnEy nEvEr eNds

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3135/2957975621_af3a436c78_b.jpg

[FazilLanka]

I like this shot..

[tonyssa]

7/10

[skyperu34]

Ok...

6.0/10

[ireneo]

7/10

[Jan Del Castillo]

8. Good building. Regards.

[deranged]

7.5/10

[xavarreiro]

7/10

[desertpunk]

Built in 1994 but it looks 1974. An anachronism. 6.5

[national guard]

7.5/10

[heroico]

by Dirk Severijnse

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3162/3038792397_9da558e341_b.jpg

by mY jOuRnEy nEvEr eNds

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3135/2957975621_af3a436c78_b.jpg

i like the second pic 8.5/10

[Eric Offereins]

7/10 :)

[sieradzanin1]

7.5/10

[New York Morning]

9.5

[KAZAN RESIDENT]

6,5/10

[THT-United]

9/10

Looks even better with nice, silvery cladding... A much-needed renovation to one of KL's skyscraper landmarks! :D