View Full Version : TTC makes ‘dumbest decision ever,’ former head warns


Skybean
July 6th, 2011, 12:57 AM
TTC makes ‘dumbest decision ever,’ former head warns
STEPHEN WICKENS
From Tuesday's Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Jul. 05, 2011 3:00AM EDT
Last updated Tuesday, Jul. 05, 2011 7:41AM EDT

Veteran transit manager David Gunn had a blunt message for the Toronto Transit Commission when he came at its invitation to provide 2012 budget advice.

“You’re headed for a cliff” and “this plan for a low-floor streetcar subway on Eglinton is insane,” were among the warnings given by Mr. Gunn – who has held top transit jobs in New York, Boston and Washington, as well at Amtrak, the U.S. passenger rail service – to TTC staff, chair Karen Stintz and vice-chair Peter Milczyn in closed-door sessions.

He said he is stunned by the lack of response to his stern advice, given in May. “There was no reaction, no questions,” said Mr. Gunn.

“They’re taking on huge financial and technological risks. There are serious safety implications. I think they’re headed for a cliff, while people talk about new uniforms.”

Torontonians may remember Mr. Gunn as the man who got the TTC’s house in order with his emphasis on “state of good repair” after the fatal 1995 subway crash, which happened months after he arrived in town. (He was TTC chief general manager from 1995 to 1999.) Signal-systems neglect was deemed to be partly to blame and further examination revealed the entire TTC, once praised continent-wide, was imperilled by corner-cutting on maintenance and repair work.

Speaking from the notes he used on his recent visit, Mr. Gunn has provided The Globe and Mail with a synopsis of his remarks, largely an analysis of the financial, technological, managerial and safety issues facing the TTC.

MAINTENANCE AND EFFICIENCY: They will never be as sexy as expansion announcements and ribbon cutting, but Mr. Gunn emphasized the TTC “should stick with two priorities – state of good repair and improved cost recovery.”

On the former, he says the $4.2-billion in the long-term state-of-good repair budget, a small part of overall capital proposals, likely isn’t enough. “But as I told the commissioners, you better protect that 4.2 like your life depends on it.”

On cost recovery, he points out that in the past decade, the proportion of operating costs covered by fares has slipped to 70 per cent from 84. “It was a conscious decision by the previous commission. You had a 350 per cent rise in the deficit while ridership rose 15 per cent. You’ve got to get the economics back. A lot of the expansion was marginal service (increased frequency on existing routes). You can undo some of that, but it’s politically tough.

“Give a lower priority to expansion and the bells and whistles. The capital budget is chaotic. There are enough plans on the books to bankrupt the province,” he said.

SHEPPARD: Before he arrived in town this spring, Mr. Gunn made clear he believes that the proposed subway extension to Scarborough will be a drain on operating funds, and the idea the private sector would build it for the city is laughable.

But he has another beef: “North-south capacity on Yonge is the TTC’s big problem. So, what are they doing? They’re planning extensions to feed the Yonge line.”

SPADINA: “The subway extension is basically on schedule and on budget, though they may be doing stuff you wouldn’t do if you had a rational commission. The stations and the line are not built to minimize costs because that previous commission (under chair Adam Giambrone) had visions of grandeur. The stations are grandiose. They’re going to be way more expensive than necessary.”

MIXING TRACK GAUGES: Claiming it will save money, Metrolinx has decided its rail projects will use North American standard gauge track, which is 60 millimetres narrower than the gauge used for the rest of the TTC system. Mr. Gunn said Metrolinx doesn’t know what it’s talking about.

“It won’t save you a nickel. Adding standard gauge cars means a separate shop for heavy maintenance, and you don’t have the people to do the work. It reduces flexibility. It may seem obscure, but it really matters. It’ll go down in railway lore as one of the dumbest decisions ever.”

EGLINTON: “Low-floor streetcars in a tunnel will cost you more than a subway while delivering less. I can’t for the life of me figure out how this decision was made.”

Cost is a big selling point for light rail, but Mr. Gunn said to put it underground requires tunnels bigger than for subways, while low-floor light-rail vehicles cost twice as much as subway cars and have less capacity. “It’s just crazy, it’s insane.”

Metrolinx says that the smaller underground stations and reusing the Scarborough RT’s right of way make light rail the more cost-effective option. Mr. Gunn responds, “That’s such nonsense, but I guess if you can defend mixing the track gauges, you can defend anything.”

STREETCARS: “It makes no sense to replace the current fleet for $1.2-billion (and $430-million – minimum – for a new storage and maintenance facility). It might cost $2-billion by the time you’re done. You could buy 200 articulated buses for less than $200-million.

“Maintenance costs will be horrific. There’ll be lots of bugs and they won’t be built like the CLRVs (current streetcars), which easily win all collisions with automobiles.

“Oh, and they’re not accessible. The floor height is about a foot. You won’t be able to load a wheelchair on the street. There will be ramps, but the floor height is going to be about a foot. The ramps will be too steep.

“I’d cancel the order. They’ll eat you out of house and home.”

ROCKETS: The new subways rolling out this month “will probably be fine trains,” he said, with reservations.

“When you go from married pairs [detachable two-car units] to a six-car permanently linked train, reliability needs skyrocket. [A minor problem on one car takes an entire train out of service.] You’ve also got to change your [maintenance] shops and you don’t have interchangeability.”

He’s also not sold on the larger capacity argument, fearing that being able to move freely through the train may lead too many people to try exiting at the same doors. “A 10- or 15-second delay from this can have big effects. Let’s see how people really use the trains.”

SIGNALS: Long-term, the TTC is looking to automate subway train control and operations. In anticipation, it’s rebuilding an old signal system while installing a new one.

“That’s really pushing it,” Mr. Gunn says. “They don’t have the people and they don’t have a general superintendent knowledgeable in this area who can arbitrate between competing projects. And the signal work will conflict with necessary station and track work.

“The best risk on this signal stuff is you lose capacity from a screw-up and work trains get in the way. The worst is an accident. That’s what happened last time [with the fatal crash in 1995].”

FRAGMENTATION: “You must fight this fragmentation of authority, I said. There’s Metrolinx and Toronto Transit Infrastructure Ltd., the mayor’s office. If you don’t go through the commission chain of command, you’ll end up with crazy decisions.”

Mr. Gunn, who had to endure the Sheppard subway project while heading the TTC, says he told current chief general manager Gary Webster: “Trust me, the last thing you want is to get tasked with a stupid project.

“Another thing I said was that if the province wants to take over parts of the TTC, give them the whole thing. The rail and the bus system are one. It’s the most integrated system, probably in the world, certainly the Western world. It’s brilliant.”

LABOUR COSTS: “Despite the rhetoric about trimming fat, [Mayor Rob Ford] struck a rich deal with the police, which will roll into the TTC. He also got the TTC put under essential services, which means you’re going to have a terrible labour settlement. I don’t like strikes, but at least the threat of one forces both sides to get real.

“Then there’s absenteeism: It’s about four or five per cent, the equivalent of an extra 400 to 500 employees covering for people calling in sick. That’s at least $30-million, maybe a lot more.”

IMPRESSIONS: “Not that things were pristine in my day, but the system looks dirty. The platforms used to get cleaned, but I was getting on at St. Clair every day for a week and there was this same mud swirl the whole time I was in Toronto. The trains aren’t getting washed either. They look shabby. It’s kinda depressing.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/ttc-makes-dumbest-decision-ever-former-head-warns/article2086415/singlepage/#articlecontent

Filip
July 6th, 2011, 01:06 AM
I'm glad someone in his capacity notices the folly of an underground LRT.

Metrolinx and TTC always had infallible logic: more money, less capacity = LRT, less money, more capacity = subway. Choose LRT.

Doh.

Kensingtonian
July 6th, 2011, 01:31 AM
Mr. Gunn's choice of words may be attention-grabbing (as intended, I'm sure), but it makes it difficult to take him seriously.

Filip
July 6th, 2011, 02:31 AM
He's the best expert on managing a transit system there is in this country.

Some of you take the words of Steve Munro like gospel even though he's an amateur streetcar fanatic with absolutely no formal training or experience in the field. What Gunn says should be respected far beyond what amateurs or politicians get.

jje10001
July 6th, 2011, 04:45 AM
I'm glad someone in his capacity notices the folly of an underground LRT.

Metrolinx and TTC always had infallible logic: more money, less capacity = LRT, less money, more capacity = subway. Choose LRT.

Doh.

But to be honest, they were working with what they had. If they had redesigned the entire line for HRT, it would have taken at least a few more years for construction to actually start. And considering today's political climate (politicians in the US cutting back heavily on public transit) and traffic problems, a quick-fix like Eglinton might be worth more than waiting for real subways.

Marcanadian
July 6th, 2011, 04:50 AM
Wow, I've never heard so much negativity from a single person before. He's right on a lot of things, but his idea of scrapping streetcars and replacing them with articulated buses is dangerous territory. Ford campaigned for this, I hope he doesn't read this article because the whole proposal to dismantle the streetcar network seems to have died for now. If he looks at this, it may be revived.

ssiguy2
July 6th, 2011, 05:02 AM
Thank god someone is saying something about the lunacy of the underground LRT.
If they are going underground for the whole length and connecting with the current SRT and converting it too then how the LRT even got into the conversation is beyond me.
It's a truly obscene waste of funds and completely illogical.

allurban
July 6th, 2011, 08:48 AM
He's the best expert on managing a transit system there is in this country.

Some of you take the words of Steve Munro like gospel even though he's an amateur streetcar fanatic with absolutely no formal training or experience in the field. What Gunn says should be respected far beyond what amateurs or politicians get.David Gunn is a management professional, not an engineer.

Steve Munro is not an engineer either - but he has experience and knowledge about public transport that goes back decades.

Maybe the two of them should get together and start talking.

Cheers, m

Nouvellecosse
July 6th, 2011, 09:21 AM
Wow, I've never heard so much negativity from a single person before. He's right on a lot of things, but his idea of scrapping streetcars and replacing them with articulated buses is dangerous territory. Ford campaigned for this, I hope he doesn't read this article because the whole proposal to dismantle the streetcar network seems to have died for now. If he looks at this, it may be revived.Yeah, that was the only suggestion I had major disagreement with as well. We obviously all know streetcars are more expensive than buses, but that's an area where cheaping out definitely doesn't make sense.

JustinB
July 6th, 2011, 12:12 PM
He's the best expert on managing a transit system there is in this country.

Some of you take the words of Steve Munro like gospel even though he's an amateur streetcar fanatic with absolutely no formal training or experience in the field. What Gunn says should be respected far beyond what amateurs or politicians get.

LOL.

Good lord. You take this subway vs. LRT nonsense to levels no one cares to go too! I am certain Steve and David have talked many times in the '90 when you were just a snot-faced tot!

I actually agree with much of what he said, but his comments about the streetcar system seems to more opinionated I think every rational thinking person here agrees replacing streetcars with buses is a simply not a good idea, and what can we do about the Ford's insane fear of surface rail? That is why we are stuck with the LRT subway!

When David Gunn talks about a subway being cheaper, does that include going to STC too? That is going to require a totally new alignment. I do not think he consider that, and he should know subway stations are huge because of the fire code.

AndrewJM3D
July 7th, 2011, 06:09 PM
I'm glad someone in his capacity notices the folly of an underground LRT.

Metrolinx and TTC always had infallible logic: more money, less capacity = LRT, less money, more capacity = subway. Choose LRT.

Doh.

To bad your mayor and his supporters don't have the capacity to stop this HUGE mistake.

SHEPPARD: Before he arrived in town this spring, Mr. Gunn made clear he believes that the proposed subway extension to Scarborough will be a drain on operating funds, and the idea the private sector would build it for the city is laughable.

But he has another beef: “North-south capacity on Yonge is the TTC’s big problem. So, what are they doing? They’re planning extensions to feed the Yonge line.”

jje10001
July 10th, 2011, 05:58 AM
He's the best expert on managing a transit system there is in this country.

Some of you take the words of Steve Munro like gospel even though he's an amateur streetcar fanatic with absolutely no formal training or experience in the field. What Gunn says should be respected far beyond what amateurs or politicians get.

As opinionated as he is, Munro still attends most transit meetings and knows far more than you ever will about the system and how it works.

As for Gunn, I definitely respect him and agree with most of what he says (excluding the streetcar stuff). He definitely seems to be on the side of keeping everything well maintained, but Toronto really needs transit expansion at this time.

ssiguy2
July 10th, 2011, 06:07 AM
I think his idea of getting rid of the downtown streetcars are illogical. Even articulated buses don't carry as many passengers as the new streetcars and they would have to run them near non-stop.
He is right about both Eglinton and Sheppard. Sheppard West to Spadina could happen as Ford will be able to get $650 from any savings on the Eglinton and he has the $300 from the feds.
Eglinton is not only as expensive as they could possibly make it but 100 meter stations of the LRT will have lower capacity than 100 meter stations of metro, monorail, or SkyTrain and will be the most difficult to build.

Professor X
July 10th, 2011, 08:06 AM
Eglinton is not only as expensive as they could possibly make it but 100 meter stations of the LRT will have lower capacity than 100 meter stations of metro, monorail, or SkyTrain and will be the most difficult to build.

Here you go again with this nonsense about LRT being more expensive than subways!

Once again, the subways to nowhere are too expensive and should not be built, and Transit City was the best thing we had that wouldn't have cost anything in terms of building stations (most 'stations' of an LRT are on the street anyway, and very accessible, unlike subway stations which need a ton of stairs, escalators and elevators for the disabled.) Also they WILL NOT be lower capacity as they run on a street and are better than buses anyway.

You keep pushing monorails as the solution to all our problems, but as much as I personally like them, they will never be built in Toronto or other parts of North America apart from Disneyland! It's time for you to face this fact and for you to STOP pushing the concept at this board.

AndrewJM3D
July 10th, 2011, 10:39 PM
He's the best expert on managing a transit system there is in this country.

Some of you take the words of Steve Munro like gospel even though he's an amateur streetcar fanatic with absolutely no formal training or experience in the field. What Gunn says should be respected far beyond what amateurs or politicians get.


And then others here are happy to just pull facts out of the air like Rob Ford.

JustinB
July 11th, 2011, 12:45 AM
As opinionated as he is, Munro still attends most transit meetings and knows far more than you ever will about the system and how it works.

When Filip saves an entire network that everyone loves, and uses, maybe I'll take him a little more seriously.

jje10001
July 11th, 2011, 02:07 AM
When Filip saves an entire network that everyone loves, and uses, maybe I'll take him a little more seriously.

Well considering that the streetcar system might possibly be targeted in Ford's Downtown Transportation Plan and bus routes in the Core Service Review, his chance might come soon enough!

KGB
July 16th, 2011, 08:02 AM
Mr. Gunn's choice of words may be attention-grabbing (as intended, I'm sure), but it makes it difficult to take him seriously.

He is rather blunt, but don't let that get in the way of the content. He eats, breaths and shits transit...not politics. And one of the secrets of the TTC's relative success is the fact that the "transit" people in the TTC have historically not been totally screwed over by the politicians. Transit experts have been running transit for the most part.

Queen's Park has played politics with the TTC from time to time, and the death blows by the likes of Harris notwithstanding...just a cross you have to bare. But things look much bleaker now, as we have an actual Mayor of the city itself who is playing god with transit, when he knows absolutely jack shit about transit. Now it's pure dumb politics and to hell with letting transit people run transit. Bring in a conservative provincial gov't during Ford's reign of terror, and the TTC could be sent a blow it will not soon recover from.

Gunn is dead on on all of his points except two....not replacing the streetcar fleet and getting back to 80%+ cost recovery figures.

But he can be forgiven for this because of political climates. During his time, the name of the game was cost efficiency (because of lost subsidies). After him the game changed, and was all about ridership increases (to win more subsidies). But the cost efficiency game was a death spiral....cut service...increase fares...and lose ridership (even with a rapidly increasing population). You can only do this for so long until you are screwed.

That's why capital projects have to be planned very carefully. Not so much because of the actual capital costs...but its future affect on the very fragile operating budget. This is what Gunn is warning about.



KGB

OEincorparated
July 19th, 2011, 05:29 AM
Hey, how is everyone doing? This samsung swype is pretty amazing couldn't type faster. Good to see that the conversation is still live and well with our citys transit. Keep up the good work and remember that OE is listening and doing his best to oblige for you. Cheer s!

Filip
July 19th, 2011, 07:27 AM
When Filip saves an entire network that everyone loves, and uses, maybe I'll take him a little more seriously.

Right, everyone loves and uses? Most who use it can't stand it, and I assure you someone living in the outer suburbs is not bending backwards to ride our trams.

Toronto should have scrapped its streetcar network in the 60s and 70s because today traffic downtown would be so severe we'd be looking at lasting solutions, not bandaging everything under the banner of LRT. I love our streetcars, unless I'm using them. Unfortunately I have little choice until GO gets its shit together and Lakeshore West frequencies get a little more palatable.

JustinB
July 19th, 2011, 03:12 PM
:lol:Right, everyone loves and uses? Most who use it can't stand it, and I assure you someone living in the outer suburbs is not bending backwards to ride our trams.[quote]

And they're not bending over backwards to scrap them either. Well, except for nut-job conservatives.

[quote]
Toronto should have scrapped its streetcar network in the 60s and 70s because today traffic downtown would be so severe we'd be looking at lasting solutions, not bandaging everything under the banner of LRT. I love our streetcars, unless I'm using them. Unfortunately I have little choice until GO gets its shit together and Lakeshore West frequencies get a little more palatable.

What??? What an idiotic statement! It's the fault of the streetcars we are in this mess? :lol: Have you forgotten the grandiose subway, and regional rail plans that were scrapped due to politics? Scrapping the streetcar system wouldn't have changed anything except make Toronto even less desirable place to live. Blame politics for this mess, not technology.

Again, with these idiotic statements, it's hard to take you seriously.

Filip
July 19th, 2011, 07:44 PM
Pulling out my trusted iPhone and using the Rocket Radar app, I notice the next streetcar going downtown at my stop is coming in 3mins, then THIRTY TWO MINUTES and then 35, 43.... I was under the impression that line had 8 min frequencies. Guess not.. I don't notice this kind of bunching with any of the bus routes I use.

I don't look at our streetcars with nostalgia, but just as another vehicle I use for commuting, and they are by far the worse. If I can't rely on them to come with acceptable frequencies and get me downtown under 45 mins, then I have no business supporting them. If a car gets me downtown in under 10 mins, and going out of my way to take the Bloor subway gets me downtown in 30 mins.. Then there's a problem when the most direct route takes me nearly an hour.

And some of you wonder why we drive.:lol:

rbt
July 19th, 2011, 08:43 PM
Pulling out my trusted iPhone and using the Rocket Radar app, I notice the next streetcar going downtown at my stop is coming in 3mins, then THIRTY TWO MINUTES and then 35, 43.... I was under the impression that line had 8 min frequencies. Guess not.. I don't notice this kind of bunching with any of the bus routes I use.

We see similar or worse bunching with any bus replacement service on the same routes; indicating to me that it isn't the type of rolling stock causing the issue.

That said, buses running every 3 minutes (because of lower capacity) is better than one of the new streetcars running every 15 minutes. Not so hot for the operating budget though.

KGB
July 19th, 2011, 08:56 PM
Again, with these idiotic statements, it's hard to take you seriously.

Yea...I almost felt like responding, but thought about it....not even worth dignifying. When the least efficient users of the road accuse the most efficient users of the road of being the problem, you know someone's reasoning is seriously flawed.



KGB

Filip
July 19th, 2011, 09:00 PM
We see similar or worse bunching with any bus replacement service on the same routes; indicating to me that it isn't the type of rolling stock causing the issue.

That said, buses running every 3 minutes (because of lower capacity) is better than one of the new streetcars running every 15 minutes. Not so hot for the operating budget though.

Really? When Queen was being reconstructed a few years ago, the bus service down Queen was colossally better. We got downtown in a breezy 25 mins! That is half the time it takes me in a streetcar. Left turning car? No problem, drive around it. Traffic also seemed to move smoother due to the 'rolling roadblock' effect of streetcars was not present.

For the 501 to function normally there has to be a complete rethink of the street. Ban left hand turns at peak hours, further ban them all day unless it's at a signalled intersection with advanced green. Finally, if you really want to make a dent on Queen, ban on street parking during peak hours, having cars and trams sharing one lane is a recipe for disaster. It escapes me how Miller refused to look at left turn bans and parking restrictions on Queen during his tenure. That would have been one progressive idea that would have fixed the 501 to be at least tolerable. Just last week, it took the streetcar about 20 mins to go from Bathurst to University.. Really?

Filip
July 19th, 2011, 09:01 PM
Yea...I almost felt like responding, but thought about it....not even worth dignifying. When the least efficient users of the road accuse the most efficient users of the road of being the problem, you know someone's reasoning is seriously flawed.



KGB

Oh please, like I really care about what a cranky old bat thinks. Let's make it another argument about Toronto's ample tree canopy while pulling statistics from the 1960s to further the argument!

JustinB
July 19th, 2011, 09:09 PM
pfft...Anyone who has ridden a busy route such as the 29, 36, or the York Mills bus knows how often these routes bunch up. Hell Steve Munro did an analysis of some of these routes!

Replacing streetcars with lower capacity buses ise not going to improve your commute, it will probably make it worse, and you'll still complain. Just buy a car and stop complaining!

Filip
July 19th, 2011, 09:16 PM
pfft...Anyone who has ridden a busy route such as the 29, 36, or the York Mills bus knows how often these routes bunch up. Hell Steve Munro did an analysis of some of these routes!

Replacing streetcars with lower capacity buses ise not going to improve your commute, it will probably make it worse, and you'll still complain. Just buy a car and stop complaining!

I will, just stop bitching that people keep driving in this city. Make transit better - people will stop driving, don't, and your commute will just get worse and worse.

jje10001
July 20th, 2011, 01:22 AM
Right, everyone loves and uses? Most who use it can't stand it, and I assure you someone living in the outer suburbs is not bending backwards to ride our trams.

Toronto should have scrapped its streetcar network in the 60s and 70s because today traffic downtown would be so severe we'd be looking at lasting solutions, not bandaging everything under the banner of LRT. I love our streetcars, unless I'm using them. Unfortunately I have little choice until GO gets its shit together and Lakeshore West frequencies get a little more palatable.

So the city should have scrapped its streetcars in anticipation of increased auto traffic forcing subway construction? I marvel at the mental gymnastics you must have taken to arrive at this conclusion.

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kyfk61ImLT1qz9peso1_r1_500.png
(This picture again.)

In a dense, jumbled city core like Toronto, car traffic should always be relegated below other forms more efficient forms transportation, because our roads simply do not have additional capacity to handle increased traffic. King can't be expanded, and I doubt that buses are able to avoid sitting behind traffic.

Auto traffic is the least efficient form of transportation, but I can't fault suburbanites for buying a car. After all, the built form of the suburbs is simply not conductive towards convenient public transit.

KGB
July 20th, 2011, 04:19 AM
our roads simply do not have additional capacity to handle increased traffic

Actually...they do. Traffic capacity could be increased by roughly 1/3 instantly by simply using ALL of the road for travelling...not parking cars on 1/3 of it.

But that won't solve the real problem, which is congestion, because no matter what the capacity is, traffic will always find its equilibrium. We would be right back to the same level of congestion, only there will be more private vehicles causing more problems than they do already, and transit vehicles moving in mixed traffic will have the same problems.

What's really needed, is politicians with the balls to implement the changes needed to reverse the trend of rewarding and pandering to the least efficient users of our infrastructure (private cars) and penalizing the most efficient users of our infrastructure (pedestrians, cyclists and public transit).

But we will never do that if we elect politicians who publicly state that "bicycles are a pain in the ass" and "roads were built for cars, not bicycles or streetcars" (which is completely false).



KGB

jje10001
July 20th, 2011, 03:34 PM
But that won't solve the real problem, which is congestion, because no matter what the capacity is, traffic will always find its equilibrium. We would be right back to the same level of congestion, only there will be more private vehicles causing more problems than they do already, and transit vehicles moving in mixed traffic will have the same problems.

Quite true. Traffic always expands to fill avaliable road space.

However, when you compare cities like Toronto to other cities, it becomes pretty clear that we don't have a neat little grid like New York or Minneapolis, so road traffic will always be a little worse.

KGB
July 20th, 2011, 04:24 PM
However, when you compare cities like Toronto to other cities, it becomes pretty clear that we don't have a neat little grid like New York or Minneapolis, so road traffic will always be a little worse.

Perhaps that's true...I really don't know. But it really isn't the point.

We don't increase transportation capacity to solve congestion problems (it doesn't work)...we increase capacity to increase economic activity along its corridor.

Since they are by far the least efficient users of the road, focussing on increasing car capacity is rather foolish. If we want the most increase in economic activity, then you have to make the priority the most efficient users of the road, which happens to be public transit. You also offset this by making pedestrians and cyclists a priority as well. The nice little added bonus for doing this is environmental improvement.

As long as we keep subsidizing and pandering to the least efficient users of our transportation system this is going to be a mess. Toronto is now at the tipping point of the inevitable change that will happen. The writing is on the wall, and the car drivers are displaying the usual push-back in the vain attempt to stop that change. But all the Rob Fords of the world cannot change it. Some will accept the change happily....others will go kicking and screaming...but go they will.



KGB