View Full Version : #132 l Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub l HANGZHOU l 248m l 41


chongqinghero
October 10th, 2004, 06:43 AM
Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub
Hangzhou, China

HEIGHT: 248m/814 feet
FLOORS: 41 floors
COMPLETION: 2003
ARCHITECT: ?

Additional Info:

Basement Floors: 3
Floor Area: 59,201 m²
Building Uses
• office
• communication



http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca391c.jpg

http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca661a.jpg

http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00ADF05D.002C

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou2.jpg

RafflesCity
October 31st, 2004, 03:42 AM
I quite like the base and the white facade goes well with such a wacky design

7/10

Sitol447
October 31st, 2004, 11:58 AM
8,5/10 - Hmmmm interesting..

AtlanticaC5
November 1st, 2004, 12:07 PM
7.5/10 Quite interesting shape, I hope they've fixed the base since that pic was taken :)

Rapid
November 2nd, 2004, 11:51 PM
It really does deserve a real name.

Wu-Gambino
November 2nd, 2004, 11:57 PM
5/10

Extremly boring facade with a redicioulous top. The only thing that saves it is the shape.

empersouf
November 5th, 2004, 02:34 PM
Doesn't look so high, I think it's as boring as Naptown says. 6.0

Dr. Dubai
November 5th, 2004, 04:46 PM
I really like the desing, typical Chinese:D 8/10

R@ptor
November 5th, 2004, 05:10 PM
I really like the design of many chinese skyscrapers...but this one is just terrible, the base, the top and the facade...all just ugly

4.0

CborG
November 6th, 2004, 10:49 PM
the architect must have had eaten some mushroom to end up with this design
:puke:/10

Hed Kandi
November 13th, 2004, 12:14 AM
nice building the 209 m is the top of the bowl.
:cheers:

kshatriya
November 18th, 2004, 03:51 PM
Wacky design. 7/10

Monkey
November 18th, 2004, 04:00 PM
An absurd building. The base, body and crown don't relate to each other, and the facade is unoriginal.

4.5

james2390
November 21st, 2004, 05:04 AM
Do they have a name for this type of architecture?

1/10

Liz L
November 24th, 2004, 10:01 PM
5/10 - I'd like to see a few more pictures, but based on what I do see...

The facade seems like it should dance with the light, there's a good contrast between stone and glass, and at least the roof isn't flat...

But the real facade doesn't look as good as the picture, the building doesn't have good height, and the base, tower, and spire don't go together AT ALL, making it look very awkward.

An attempt to be imaginative that didn't quite turn out right...Maybe an E for efort, though....

DamienK
November 24th, 2004, 10:14 PM
Some nice individual features, but they tried to cram too much into this building, and it looks odd. 6/10.

Taufiq
December 3rd, 2004, 03:46 AM
I like the ball at the top, although I don't like it's height.
7/10

dunnsgr
December 6th, 2004, 01:51 AM
Its like the designer worked too hard. The photograph shows a completely different color scheme than the drawings and what is with the fuschia band above the lobby????? That is completely off the wall, at least it wasn't pink in the finished product.

Zaqattaq
December 6th, 2004, 04:07 AM
7.5

I rather like the ball thing

TritaniumZ3
December 7th, 2004, 04:07 AM
Only one thing to say. That does not look like the 92 tallest!It looks like 600 feat.

ENDOPHINS
December 8th, 2004, 02:09 PM
Another rocket ?? Pretty high but not my taste . 4/10

7 World Trade
December 15th, 2004, 05:14 AM
it's not too bad of a building, but the tallest spire is really unnecessary. but i think the building's taller than what the rendering seem to depict. the rendering just doesn't do it justice.

still, they should've made the top a cube instead of a sphere. a sphere on top of a box just doesn't fit.

6.5

Iiee
December 16th, 2004, 03:02 AM
ugly, 3/10 :bash:

i-mean
December 16th, 2004, 06:20 AM
it's quite bad looking of a skyscraper,but i like the ball on the top

Raine
January 7th, 2005, 04:22 PM
I don't like it
4.5/10

Postuh
January 10th, 2005, 10:08 PM
The top whit the bal in it: 7.5/10
Ground Flours: 5/10

7.5+5=12.5/2=6.25= 6

Rotterdam 4evah

:cheers:

360 Modena
January 11th, 2005, 05:50 AM
Looks like a stubby syringe...... 4

Chad
January 11th, 2005, 05:58 AM
Is it really finished?, the base picture looks like it has been deserted quite a longtime for somehow.

Okapi
January 12th, 2005, 07:58 PM
Not my type.
4,5/10

lffıs
January 16th, 2005, 05:26 PM
250 meters???? It rather looks like 100, or even less.

But because of the nice (chinese!) design, I give it a 6/10.

renell
January 17th, 2005, 09:54 AM
6.5/10 again another building ruined by the top.

Þróndeimr
January 17th, 2005, 09:49 PM
6.5/10

Fabio
January 19th, 2005, 02:07 AM
6/10

I don't like it much

SkyHawk
January 20th, 2005, 04:17 PM
9/10

TYW
January 31st, 2005, 12:50 PM
the base doesn't fit the middle, the middle doesn't fit the top. but each part looks nice separately:D

6/10

NapHsu4922
February 1st, 2005, 02:30 AM
Im not a big fan of the base 5.5/10

Shion Uzuki
February 4th, 2005, 06:06 PM
not perfect, but its different.

I like the top sphere. very futuristic

-(・∀・)-(^。^)-
February 5th, 2005, 02:35 PM
/( ^。^)/ BAD \(^。^)\

Kevinkhoo1986
February 8th, 2005, 06:17 PM
Why are most of the tall chinese skyscraper tend to have spire on top on it? It just make thing worst.

baqthier
February 8th, 2005, 06:21 PM
The thing is the spire is too thin.

6.5/10

BHK25
February 19th, 2005, 06:15 PM
I don't like it 5.0

chongqinghero
March 3rd, 2005, 10:38 AM
http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00CA391C.002C http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00CA661A.002C :cheers: en

london-b
March 7th, 2005, 11:50 PM
Ugly, sorry 4/10

Q-TIP
March 11th, 2005, 03:51 PM
8.5/10 That went it very quickly!

Alvin
March 11th, 2005, 04:11 PM
Not great...6.5/10

Xeni-2
March 12th, 2005, 09:01 AM
I don't like this building. 6.5/10

MattSal
March 14th, 2005, 04:10 AM
You know it's bad when the building looks better in the rendering than it does in photos. I give it a 6/10, mostly for the facade.

Winus
April 12th, 2005, 12:33 PM
Crapcrapcrap 4/10

get13
April 12th, 2005, 02:06 PM
Eewwww 2/10

Pengui
April 20th, 2005, 05:59 AM
Hahaha, wacky ^^
The box' cladding is really nice though, the top is weird, not in a bad way, and the base has a funny rocket look :-) I think this must be the wackiest of the top 100 ^^
Would have liked it taller.
7.5

Justadude
April 21st, 2005, 08:58 AM
Peculiar building. The ball-spire combo is weird, but without that it would be a very plain building. I don't like the mix of vertical and horizontal stripes. I wish we had more pics to look at. 6/10

1st Division Marine
April 21st, 2005, 09:08 AM
10.

360 Modena
April 22nd, 2005, 11:49 AM
awww... don't be so mean guys, look a 10^ :) thats the spirt! 1O for me too :D

Phobos
May 14th, 2005, 01:44 AM
5/10

I don't like this kind of chinese buildings.

Latoso
May 27th, 2005, 11:57 PM
6.5/10

Jules
May 29th, 2005, 12:05 AM
The ball on top ruins it for me. 5.

geminiguy7
June 8th, 2005, 03:03 AM
i like the ball 7/10

SoboleuS
June 8th, 2005, 12:03 PM
Don't like it. Looks cheap and kitschy. 4,5/10

Reflex
June 10th, 2005, 02:32 AM
7.5/10.

DRAKKO
June 10th, 2005, 03:00 AM
7/10 no se ve tan alto

Medo
June 18th, 2005, 08:05 AM
interesting tower, 7/10

ROYAL BLUE
July 8th, 2005, 02:03 AM
10/10

Djoez
July 10th, 2005, 12:10 PM
Not my cup of tea! The top looks ridiculous 3/10

B@dGuYoM
July 10th, 2005, 12:54 PM
7/10

clarky
July 10th, 2005, 01:25 PM
interesting 8/10

Zarkon
July 10th, 2005, 10:17 PM
the crown is lovely!! 7.5

EarlyBird
July 14th, 2005, 09:08 PM
Strange design. Not my kind of thing, but quite interesting. 7/10.

Chibcha2k
July 18th, 2005, 10:08 AM
<3.5

i hate it

Accura4Matalan
July 18th, 2005, 01:05 PM
6.5/10

JDRS
July 18th, 2005, 08:40 PM
7.5/10

Javi
July 19th, 2005, 11:29 PM
great base and facade. 9/10

El_Greco
August 9th, 2005, 08:59 PM
hmm well..i like facade..but..c'mon why they are building such buildings? :poke: 6/10

verycoolnin
August 11th, 2005, 05:01 AM
In that last picture it looks run down. 5 of 10.

jimm
August 11th, 2005, 08:25 PM
6/10

Trances
August 28th, 2005, 10:19 AM
oddly impressive
9/10

pali
September 6th, 2005, 03:03 AM
good looking building 7

andysimo123
September 9th, 2005, 12:41 AM
6/10 different design from most other buildings.

Imperfect Ending
September 21st, 2005, 06:38 AM
7/10

hotel shampoo bottle

rk_rk
October 1st, 2005, 04:19 PM
Nothing special. 5/10

jesarm
October 2nd, 2005, 05:09 PM
I don´t like very much this building 6/10 bu it has innovative and original extructure

Dancer
October 4th, 2005, 07:51 AM
No its not good looking. i dont know why I just dont like it. 6.0

The Mad Hatter!!
October 4th, 2005, 04:52 PM
4.5
what a wierd building, the top looks ugly thanks to the sphere thing,facade not to bad.but the base has to be the worst part of the building

Gerard
October 6th, 2005, 10:42 AM
Typical chinese and therefor not my cup of tea. 6/10

Henk
October 15th, 2005, 12:49 PM
I don't like the ball on the top of the building. 6.5/10.

www.sercan.de
October 23rd, 2005, 03:37 PM
6/10

Skylandman
October 30th, 2005, 08:44 PM
4.5/10 looks like made by childrens

sharpie20
November 20th, 2005, 10:13 AM
3/10 just plain bad

Cabman
November 22nd, 2005, 04:20 AM
What a nightmare 4.

ChiLooper
November 23rd, 2005, 04:13 AM
Eh
5/10

CrazyCanuck
November 23rd, 2005, 04:25 AM
I can't seem to like this no matter how hard I try, 5/10

Adam from Oz
November 24th, 2005, 04:16 PM
Silly architecture.

5/10

Cheers,

Adam

superskyline
November 24th, 2005, 05:32 PM
i dont like it... plus it looks wicked short!
5/10

DïegôLG
November 26th, 2005, 07:07 AM
6/10

Sinjin P.
December 3rd, 2005, 04:31 AM
OMG! 7/10

forvine
December 7th, 2005, 11:21 AM
Another building in China that like to have a Ball or globe somewhere in their building... 4/10

mr_storms
December 31st, 2005, 02:19 AM
bland building with a bad top and bottom. 4.5/10

anakin
January 2nd, 2006, 09:10 PM
8/10

Principes
January 3rd, 2006, 09:01 AM
6/10 battered.

P.

FROM LOS ANGELES
January 6th, 2006, 03:34 AM
Well, it succeded in sticking it out, nice too. 7/10

warnings
January 9th, 2006, 01:32 PM
5/10

Scruffy88
January 10th, 2006, 04:16 PM
2/10

Moren-o
January 22nd, 2006, 06:06 PM
You can't be serious when you design a base like that, the top is too much as well.
5/10

premier
January 22nd, 2006, 09:20 PM
The building-6.5/10
The ball-1/10
Overall-3.5/10

FJP
March 19th, 2006, 03:01 PM
7/10

davidwei01
March 19th, 2006, 03:12 PM
Hangzhou is a large city in China. It'll be better after Shanghai-Hangzhou maglev's completed. 9/10

marpa
April 14th, 2006, 11:43 PM
3/10

willbig13
April 16th, 2006, 07:17 AM
Not a fan overall, but not the ugliest building ever, 4.5

Guangzhou
April 16th, 2006, 07:20 AM
It's shit. 0/10

Skyman
April 17th, 2006, 03:35 PM
It's ugly stuff...2/10

Mosaic
April 18th, 2006, 11:48 AM
ugly. 3/10

dżimi pejdż
April 18th, 2006, 02:37 PM
4/10

LAYZIEDOGG
June 4th, 2006, 01:09 AM
nothing special 6/10

Woko
June 4th, 2006, 07:17 PM
ugly 0/10

ZZ-II
June 13th, 2006, 11:11 AM
7.5/10...looks to small

mtt16
June 29th, 2006, 10:24 AM
7.5/10

virarch
July 3rd, 2006, 10:27 PM
1/10

yet another failed attempt to look "modern" or "different" by cramping all kinds of shapes and styles into a single building.

I suggest we give such brainless design patterns a more vivid description: "skyline littering with Chinese characteristics."

broadie
July 12th, 2006, 08:15 AM
cool i like it 7/10

mannix_10
July 12th, 2006, 08:22 AM
8/10

gutooo
July 16th, 2006, 10:03 AM
6/10

Mosaic
August 19th, 2006, 08:56 AM
6/10

Dreamlıneя
September 5th, 2006, 05:50 AM
6/10

skipperBill
September 10th, 2006, 10:19 PM
6.5/10.

_zner_
November 8th, 2006, 04:54 AM
9. a bit odd but looks nice.

Chinky Orz
November 16th, 2006, 01:42 AM
8/10 Very nice top but the base just looks so awkward

weirdo
November 26th, 2006, 02:39 PM
no pic of the real thing from top to bottom yet?

alsen
January 19th, 2007, 04:36 PM
not my type..4.5

ROYU
January 20th, 2007, 06:14 AM
What a bad thing 5.0

FloridaFuture
January 20th, 2007, 10:26 PM
Boring facade, boring building
4.5/10

david thomas
January 30th, 2007, 03:21 PM
0 / 10

I don't think the architect of this building will be able to design well even after 30 more years of learning and hard work. He simply doesn't have the necessary artistic flair. He should change job.

kamil.bukowski
January 30th, 2007, 09:29 PM
7.5/10

W!CKED
April 14th, 2007, 03:02 PM
7/10

Ralphkke
May 12th, 2007, 03:54 AM
Nice. 7 out of 10.

Aliya
June 25th, 2007, 03:56 PM
7.5/10 looks lke a rocket

Skyman
June 28th, 2007, 09:08 AM
7/10

Kelsen
July 13th, 2007, 07:16 AM
8/10

Piotr-Stettin
August 1st, 2007, 02:46 AM
6,5/10

Sound.
August 26th, 2007, 10:20 PM
6/10

LMCA1990
August 26th, 2007, 11:13 PM
7/10

Slodi
August 27th, 2007, 12:20 PM
ugly base but the rest quite good 7/10

newyorkrunaway1
September 25th, 2007, 09:48 AM
1/10

Astralis
September 25th, 2007, 03:33 PM
6/10

MasonicStage™
September 26th, 2007, 08:21 PM
8,5/10

RON-E
September 27th, 2007, 08:12 AM
1/10

Nikkodemo
December 20th, 2007, 10:29 AM
What a name!

7/10

kon133
January 1st, 2008, 12:05 AM
3/10 :ohno:

krzewi
January 7th, 2008, 10:49 PM
3 thats ugly !!!

IMPRESARIO
January 21st, 2008, 01:58 AM
Another rocket ?? Pretty high

Halabalooza
February 24th, 2008, 10:37 AM
8.5 its nice

GOR@N
April 12th, 2008, 05:16 PM
7/10

Fundador
April 16th, 2008, 12:03 PM
intersting design 8/10

Teriyaki
April 16th, 2008, 04:28 PM
10/10

henry hill
September 19th, 2008, 05:03 PM
Interesting, strange, can even too strange. Matter of the taste as ever:)

5/10

Eric Offereins
October 12th, 2008, 02:35 PM
6/10

Rutger1991
October 16th, 2008, 10:20 PM
8/10

Kawasaki KG
October 17th, 2008, 10:54 AM
5.5/10

DinamiT
April 3rd, 2009, 02:39 AM
8.5/10

A_Voz_Da_Figueira
April 3rd, 2009, 02:25 PM
9,5/10

rockin'.baltimorean
April 5th, 2009, 04:32 AM
looks like a rocket......

6/10

tonyssa
April 19th, 2009, 09:33 PM
7/10

skyperu34
May 16th, 2009, 12:14 AM
Ugly...

3.0/10

pepe.eu
May 30th, 2009, 01:46 AM
7.5/10

ireneo
June 20th, 2009, 12:21 AM
7.5

Jan Del Castillo
July 28th, 2009, 06:26 PM
8. Good building. Regards.

deranged
August 14th, 2009, 07:40 AM
7/10

xavarreiro
October 17th, 2009, 07:34 PM
8/10

desertpunk
October 30th, 2009, 12:43 PM
A rocket to Mars that will never leave the launchpad (unfortunately). 2

national guard
November 12th, 2009, 09:46 AM
^^:lol::lol::lol:

ugly base.

6.5/10

Heroico
November 18th, 2009, 10:36 PM
Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub
Hangzhou, China

HEIGHT: 248m/814 feet
FLOORS: 41 floors
COMPLETION: 2003
ARCHITECT: ?

Additional Info:

Basement Floors: 3
Floor Area: 59,201 m²
Building Uses
• office
• communication



http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca391c.jpg

http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca661a.jpg

http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00ADF05D.002C

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou2.jpg

6/10

bonivison
November 19th, 2009, 04:37 AM
顶个球用大厦
都不知道说什么好了
杭州在我心中是那么有品位的城市 怎么也会这么喜欢顶个球用啊
最触目惊心的是武汉的顶个球用大厦 中国城市就好这一口
总喜欢在楼顶上做点文章

sieradzanin1
December 30th, 2009, 04:23 PM
6.5/10

New York Morning
January 6th, 2010, 07:46 PM
7.5

Heidjer
August 12th, 2010, 03:46 PM
Well, I've seen a handful worse, that's why it get's an 1.5/10

motozine
August 16th, 2010, 06:27 AM
this building definetely inspired by pearl oriental tower in shanghai.unique 7.5/10

romanito
August 24th, 2010, 08:38 PM
9/10

OldBoy137
September 8th, 2010, 06:24 PM
8/10, I like sphere on the roof.

NorteN
September 10th, 2010, 07:04 PM
8/10

ethan153
September 21st, 2010, 11:43 PM
6.5

Geocarlos
February 10th, 2011, 04:00 AM
Very chinese...7/10

v-sun
February 11th, 2011, 07:36 AM
7/10

MonsterPug
March 14th, 2011, 03:25 AM
6/10

mr.hanoi
April 23rd, 2011, 06:11 PM
7/10

yudibali2008
May 19th, 2011, 01:18 AM
7/10

dnh310
May 24th, 2011, 01:36 AM
6,5/10

mecanico242
June 28th, 2011, 04:57 AM
6/10