View Full Version : #132 l Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub l HANGZHOU l 248m l 41
chongqinghero October 10th, 2004, 06:43 AM Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub
Hangzhou, China
HEIGHT: 248m/814 feet
FLOORS: 41 floors
COMPLETION: 2003
ARCHITECT: ?
Additional Info:
Basement Floors: 3
Floor Area: 59,201 m²
Building Uses
• office
• communication
http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca391c.jpg
http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca661a.jpg
http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00ADF05D.002C
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou2.jpg
RafflesCity October 31st, 2004, 03:42 AM I quite like the base and the white facade goes well with such a wacky design
7/10
Sitol447 October 31st, 2004, 11:58 AM 8,5/10 - Hmmmm interesting..
AtlanticaC5 November 1st, 2004, 12:07 PM 7.5/10 Quite interesting shape, I hope they've fixed the base since that pic was taken :)
Rapid November 2nd, 2004, 11:51 PM It really does deserve a real name.
Wu-Gambino November 2nd, 2004, 11:57 PM 5/10
Extremly boring facade with a redicioulous top. The only thing that saves it is the shape.
empersouf November 5th, 2004, 02:34 PM Doesn't look so high, I think it's as boring as Naptown says. 6.0
Dr. Dubai November 5th, 2004, 04:46 PM I really like the desing, typical Chinese:D 8/10
R@ptor November 5th, 2004, 05:10 PM I really like the design of many chinese skyscrapers...but this one is just terrible, the base, the top and the facade...all just ugly
4.0
CborG November 6th, 2004, 10:49 PM the architect must have had eaten some mushroom to end up with this design
:puke:/10
Hed Kandi November 13th, 2004, 12:14 AM nice building the 209 m is the top of the bowl.
:cheers:
kshatriya November 18th, 2004, 03:51 PM Wacky design. 7/10
Monkey November 18th, 2004, 04:00 PM An absurd building. The base, body and crown don't relate to each other, and the facade is unoriginal.
4.5
james2390 November 21st, 2004, 05:04 AM Do they have a name for this type of architecture?
1/10
Liz L November 24th, 2004, 10:01 PM 5/10 - I'd like to see a few more pictures, but based on what I do see...
The facade seems like it should dance with the light, there's a good contrast between stone and glass, and at least the roof isn't flat...
But the real facade doesn't look as good as the picture, the building doesn't have good height, and the base, tower, and spire don't go together AT ALL, making it look very awkward.
An attempt to be imaginative that didn't quite turn out right...Maybe an E for efort, though....
DamienK November 24th, 2004, 10:14 PM Some nice individual features, but they tried to cram too much into this building, and it looks odd. 6/10.
Taufiq December 3rd, 2004, 03:46 AM I like the ball at the top, although I don't like it's height.
7/10
dunnsgr December 6th, 2004, 01:51 AM Its like the designer worked too hard. The photograph shows a completely different color scheme than the drawings and what is with the fuschia band above the lobby????? That is completely off the wall, at least it wasn't pink in the finished product.
Zaqattaq December 6th, 2004, 04:07 AM 7.5
I rather like the ball thing
TritaniumZ3 December 7th, 2004, 04:07 AM Only one thing to say. That does not look like the 92 tallest!It looks like 600 feat.
ENDOPHINS December 8th, 2004, 02:09 PM Another rocket ?? Pretty high but not my taste . 4/10
7 World Trade December 15th, 2004, 05:14 AM it's not too bad of a building, but the tallest spire is really unnecessary. but i think the building's taller than what the rendering seem to depict. the rendering just doesn't do it justice.
still, they should've made the top a cube instead of a sphere. a sphere on top of a box just doesn't fit.
6.5
Iiee December 16th, 2004, 03:02 AM ugly, 3/10 :bash:
i-mean December 16th, 2004, 06:20 AM it's quite bad looking of a skyscraper,but i like the ball on the top
Raine January 7th, 2005, 04:22 PM I don't like it
4.5/10
Postuh January 10th, 2005, 10:08 PM The top whit the bal in it: 7.5/10
Ground Flours: 5/10
7.5+5=12.5/2=6.25= 6
Rotterdam 4evah
:cheers:
360 Modena January 11th, 2005, 05:50 AM Looks like a stubby syringe...... 4
Chad January 11th, 2005, 05:58 AM Is it really finished?, the base picture looks like it has been deserted quite a longtime for somehow.
Okapi January 12th, 2005, 07:58 PM Not my type.
4,5/10
lffıs January 16th, 2005, 05:26 PM 250 meters???? It rather looks like 100, or even less.
But because of the nice (chinese!) design, I give it a 6/10.
renell January 17th, 2005, 09:54 AM 6.5/10 again another building ruined by the top.
Þróndeimr January 17th, 2005, 09:49 PM 6.5/10
Fabio January 19th, 2005, 02:07 AM 6/10
I don't like it much
SkyHawk January 20th, 2005, 04:17 PM 9/10
TYW January 31st, 2005, 12:50 PM the base doesn't fit the middle, the middle doesn't fit the top. but each part looks nice separately:D
6/10
NapHsu4922 February 1st, 2005, 02:30 AM Im not a big fan of the base 5.5/10
Shion Uzuki February 4th, 2005, 06:06 PM not perfect, but its different.
I like the top sphere. very futuristic
-(・∀・)-(^。^)- February 5th, 2005, 02:35 PM /( ^。^)/ BAD \(^。^)\
Kevinkhoo1986 February 8th, 2005, 06:17 PM Why are most of the tall chinese skyscraper tend to have spire on top on it? It just make thing worst.
baqthier February 8th, 2005, 06:21 PM The thing is the spire is too thin.
6.5/10
BHK25 February 19th, 2005, 06:15 PM I don't like it 5.0
chongqinghero March 3rd, 2005, 10:38 AM http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00CA391C.002C http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00CA661A.002C :cheers: en
london-b March 7th, 2005, 11:50 PM Ugly, sorry 4/10
Q-TIP March 11th, 2005, 03:51 PM 8.5/10 That went it very quickly!
Alvin March 11th, 2005, 04:11 PM Not great...6.5/10
Xeni-2 March 12th, 2005, 09:01 AM I don't like this building. 6.5/10
MattSal March 14th, 2005, 04:10 AM You know it's bad when the building looks better in the rendering than it does in photos. I give it a 6/10, mostly for the facade.
Winus April 12th, 2005, 12:33 PM Crapcrapcrap 4/10
get13 April 12th, 2005, 02:06 PM Eewwww 2/10
Pengui April 20th, 2005, 05:59 AM Hahaha, wacky ^^
The box' cladding is really nice though, the top is weird, not in a bad way, and the base has a funny rocket look :-) I think this must be the wackiest of the top 100 ^^
Would have liked it taller.
7.5
Justadude April 21st, 2005, 08:58 AM Peculiar building. The ball-spire combo is weird, but without that it would be a very plain building. I don't like the mix of vertical and horizontal stripes. I wish we had more pics to look at. 6/10
1st Division Marine April 21st, 2005, 09:08 AM 10.
360 Modena April 22nd, 2005, 11:49 AM awww... don't be so mean guys, look a 10^ :) thats the spirt! 1O for me too :D
Phobos May 14th, 2005, 01:44 AM 5/10
I don't like this kind of chinese buildings.
Latoso May 27th, 2005, 11:57 PM 6.5/10
Jules May 29th, 2005, 12:05 AM The ball on top ruins it for me. 5.
geminiguy7 June 8th, 2005, 03:03 AM i like the ball 7/10
SoboleuS June 8th, 2005, 12:03 PM Don't like it. Looks cheap and kitschy. 4,5/10
Reflex June 10th, 2005, 02:32 AM 7.5/10.
DRAKKO June 10th, 2005, 03:00 AM 7/10 no se ve tan alto
Medo June 18th, 2005, 08:05 AM interesting tower, 7/10
ROYAL BLUE July 8th, 2005, 02:03 AM 10/10
Djoez July 10th, 2005, 12:10 PM Not my cup of tea! The top looks ridiculous 3/10
B@dGuYoM July 10th, 2005, 12:54 PM 7/10
clarky July 10th, 2005, 01:25 PM interesting 8/10
Zarkon July 10th, 2005, 10:17 PM the crown is lovely!! 7.5
EarlyBird July 14th, 2005, 09:08 PM Strange design. Not my kind of thing, but quite interesting. 7/10.
Chibcha2k July 18th, 2005, 10:08 AM <3.5
i hate it
Accura4Matalan July 18th, 2005, 01:05 PM 6.5/10
JDRS July 18th, 2005, 08:40 PM 7.5/10
Javi July 19th, 2005, 11:29 PM great base and facade. 9/10
El_Greco August 9th, 2005, 08:59 PM hmm well..i like facade..but..c'mon why they are building such buildings? :poke: 6/10
verycoolnin August 11th, 2005, 05:01 AM In that last picture it looks run down. 5 of 10.
jimm August 11th, 2005, 08:25 PM 6/10
Trances August 28th, 2005, 10:19 AM oddly impressive
9/10
pali September 6th, 2005, 03:03 AM good looking building 7
andysimo123 September 9th, 2005, 12:41 AM 6/10 different design from most other buildings.
Imperfect Ending September 21st, 2005, 06:38 AM 7/10
hotel shampoo bottle
rk_rk October 1st, 2005, 04:19 PM Nothing special. 5/10
jesarm October 2nd, 2005, 05:09 PM I don´t like very much this building 6/10 bu it has innovative and original extructure
Dancer October 4th, 2005, 07:51 AM No its not good looking. i dont know why I just dont like it. 6.0
The Mad Hatter!! October 4th, 2005, 04:52 PM 4.5
what a wierd building, the top looks ugly thanks to the sphere thing,facade not to bad.but the base has to be the worst part of the building
Gerard October 6th, 2005, 10:42 AM Typical chinese and therefor not my cup of tea. 6/10
Henk October 15th, 2005, 12:49 PM I don't like the ball on the top of the building. 6.5/10.
www.sercan.de October 23rd, 2005, 03:37 PM 6/10
Skylandman October 30th, 2005, 08:44 PM 4.5/10 looks like made by childrens
sharpie20 November 20th, 2005, 10:13 AM 3/10 just plain bad
Cabman November 22nd, 2005, 04:20 AM What a nightmare 4.
ChiLooper November 23rd, 2005, 04:13 AM Eh
5/10
CrazyCanuck November 23rd, 2005, 04:25 AM I can't seem to like this no matter how hard I try, 5/10
Adam from Oz November 24th, 2005, 04:16 PM Silly architecture.
5/10
Cheers,
Adam
superskyline November 24th, 2005, 05:32 PM i dont like it... plus it looks wicked short!
5/10
DïegôLG November 26th, 2005, 07:07 AM 6/10
Sinjin P. December 3rd, 2005, 04:31 AM OMG! 7/10
forvine December 7th, 2005, 11:21 AM Another building in China that like to have a Ball or globe somewhere in their building... 4/10
mr_storms December 31st, 2005, 02:19 AM bland building with a bad top and bottom. 4.5/10
anakin January 2nd, 2006, 09:10 PM 8/10
Principes January 3rd, 2006, 09:01 AM 6/10 battered.
P.
FROM LOS ANGELES January 6th, 2006, 03:34 AM Well, it succeded in sticking it out, nice too. 7/10
warnings January 9th, 2006, 01:32 PM 5/10
Scruffy88 January 10th, 2006, 04:16 PM 2/10
Moren-o January 22nd, 2006, 06:06 PM You can't be serious when you design a base like that, the top is too much as well.
5/10
premier January 22nd, 2006, 09:20 PM The building-6.5/10
The ball-1/10
Overall-3.5/10
FJP March 19th, 2006, 03:01 PM 7/10
davidwei01 March 19th, 2006, 03:12 PM Hangzhou is a large city in China. It'll be better after Shanghai-Hangzhou maglev's completed. 9/10
marpa April 14th, 2006, 11:43 PM 3/10
willbig13 April 16th, 2006, 07:17 AM Not a fan overall, but not the ugliest building ever, 4.5
Guangzhou April 16th, 2006, 07:20 AM It's shit. 0/10
Skyman April 17th, 2006, 03:35 PM It's ugly stuff...2/10
Mosaic April 18th, 2006, 11:48 AM ugly. 3/10
dżimi pejdż April 18th, 2006, 02:37 PM 4/10
LAYZIEDOGG June 4th, 2006, 01:09 AM nothing special 6/10
Woko June 4th, 2006, 07:17 PM ugly 0/10
ZZ-II June 13th, 2006, 11:11 AM 7.5/10...looks to small
mtt16 June 29th, 2006, 10:24 AM 7.5/10
virarch July 3rd, 2006, 10:27 PM 1/10
yet another failed attempt to look "modern" or "different" by cramping all kinds of shapes and styles into a single building.
I suggest we give such brainless design patterns a more vivid description: "skyline littering with Chinese characteristics."
broadie July 12th, 2006, 08:15 AM cool i like it 7/10
mannix_10 July 12th, 2006, 08:22 AM 8/10
gutooo July 16th, 2006, 10:03 AM 6/10
Mosaic August 19th, 2006, 08:56 AM 6/10
Dreamlıneя September 5th, 2006, 05:50 AM 6/10
skipperBill September 10th, 2006, 10:19 PM 6.5/10.
_zner_ November 8th, 2006, 04:54 AM 9. a bit odd but looks nice.
Chinky Orz November 16th, 2006, 01:42 AM 8/10 Very nice top but the base just looks so awkward
weirdo November 26th, 2006, 02:39 PM no pic of the real thing from top to bottom yet?
alsen January 19th, 2007, 04:36 PM not my type..4.5
ROYU January 20th, 2007, 06:14 AM What a bad thing 5.0
FloridaFuture January 20th, 2007, 10:26 PM Boring facade, boring building
4.5/10
david thomas January 30th, 2007, 03:21 PM 0 / 10
I don't think the architect of this building will be able to design well even after 30 more years of learning and hard work. He simply doesn't have the necessary artistic flair. He should change job.
kamil.bukowski January 30th, 2007, 09:29 PM 7.5/10
W!CKED April 14th, 2007, 03:02 PM 7/10
Ralphkke May 12th, 2007, 03:54 AM Nice. 7 out of 10.
Aliya June 25th, 2007, 03:56 PM 7.5/10 looks lke a rocket
Skyman June 28th, 2007, 09:08 AM 7/10
Kelsen July 13th, 2007, 07:16 AM 8/10
Piotr-Stettin August 1st, 2007, 02:46 AM 6,5/10
Sound. August 26th, 2007, 10:20 PM 6/10
LMCA1990 August 26th, 2007, 11:13 PM 7/10
Slodi August 27th, 2007, 12:20 PM ugly base but the rest quite good 7/10
newyorkrunaway1 September 25th, 2007, 09:48 AM 1/10
Astralis September 25th, 2007, 03:33 PM 6/10
MasonicStage™ September 26th, 2007, 08:21 PM 8,5/10
RON-E September 27th, 2007, 08:12 AM 1/10
Nikkodemo December 20th, 2007, 10:29 AM What a name!
7/10
kon133 January 1st, 2008, 12:05 AM 3/10 :ohno:
krzewi January 7th, 2008, 10:49 PM 3 thats ugly !!!
IMPRESARIO January 21st, 2008, 01:58 AM Another rocket ?? Pretty high
Halabalooza February 24th, 2008, 10:37 AM 8.5 its nice
GOR@N April 12th, 2008, 05:16 PM 7/10
Fundador April 16th, 2008, 12:03 PM intersting design 8/10
Teriyaki April 16th, 2008, 04:28 PM 10/10
henry hill September 19th, 2008, 05:03 PM Interesting, strange, can even too strange. Matter of the taste as ever:)
5/10
Eric Offereins October 12th, 2008, 02:35 PM 6/10
Rutger1991 October 16th, 2008, 10:20 PM 8/10
Kawasaki KG October 17th, 2008, 10:54 AM 5.5/10
DinamiT April 3rd, 2009, 02:39 AM 8.5/10
A_Voz_Da_Figueira April 3rd, 2009, 02:25 PM 9,5/10
rockin'.baltimorean April 5th, 2009, 04:32 AM looks like a rocket......
6/10
tonyssa April 19th, 2009, 09:33 PM 7/10
skyperu34 May 16th, 2009, 12:14 AM Ugly...
3.0/10
pepe.eu May 30th, 2009, 01:46 AM 7.5/10
ireneo June 20th, 2009, 12:21 AM 7.5
Jan Del Castillo July 28th, 2009, 06:26 PM 8. Good building. Regards.
deranged August 14th, 2009, 07:40 AM 7/10
xavarreiro October 17th, 2009, 07:34 PM 8/10
desertpunk October 30th, 2009, 12:43 PM A rocket to Mars that will never leave the launchpad (unfortunately). 2
national guard November 12th, 2009, 09:46 AM ^^:lol::lol::lol:
ugly base.
6.5/10
Heroico November 18th, 2009, 10:36 PM Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub
Hangzhou, China
HEIGHT: 248m/814 feet
FLOORS: 41 floors
COMPLETION: 2003
ARCHITECT: ?
Additional Info:
Basement Floors: 3
Floor Area: 59,201 m²
Building Uses
• office
• communication
http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca391c.jpg
http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/636700ca661a.jpg
http://forum.xinhuanet.com/upfiles/00ADF05D.002C
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/rotpics03/hangzhou2.jpg
6/10
bonivison November 19th, 2009, 04:37 AM 顶个球用大厦
都不知道说什么好了
杭州在我心中是那么有品位的城市 怎么也会这么喜欢顶个球用啊
最触目惊心的是武汉的顶个球用大厦 中国城市就好这一口
总喜欢在楼顶上做点文章
sieradzanin1 December 30th, 2009, 04:23 PM 6.5/10
New York Morning January 6th, 2010, 07:46 PM 7.5
Heidjer August 12th, 2010, 03:46 PM Well, I've seen a handful worse, that's why it get's an 1.5/10
motozine August 16th, 2010, 06:27 AM this building definetely inspired by pearl oriental tower in shanghai.unique 7.5/10
romanito August 24th, 2010, 08:38 PM 9/10
OldBoy137 September 8th, 2010, 06:24 PM 8/10, I like sphere on the roof.
NorteN September 10th, 2010, 07:04 PM 8/10
ethan153 September 21st, 2010, 11:43 PM 6.5
Geocarlos February 10th, 2011, 04:00 AM Very chinese...7/10
v-sun February 11th, 2011, 07:36 AM 7/10
MonsterPug March 14th, 2011, 03:25 AM 6/10
mr.hanoi April 23rd, 2011, 06:11 PM 7/10
yudibali2008 May 19th, 2011, 01:18 AM 7/10
dnh310 May 24th, 2011, 01:36 AM 6,5/10
mecanico242 June 28th, 2011, 04:57 AM 6/10
|
|