View Full Version : Stockholm Nordic Crescent | Vision


dj4life
July 24th, 2011, 12:43 AM
Since this is an interesting sollution and project/idea, i would like to create a sepparate thread where we could discuss the different aspects of it. The main goal of the project is developing an area in Nacka Forum:

Name: 'Stockholm Nordic Crescent';
Architects: D’arc Studio+Rosa Topputo;
The project: Stockholm Nordic Crescent (Europan 9 contest) Nacka Forum is a peripheral area to Stockholm. Its main limit to a future development is that it is placed beside a highway border. But this is now impossible to renounce and, waiting for a possible cover of the highway, we have to plan an integrated system between the area and the highway, connecting the north side with the south side by a 'social' bridge that will be a part of a new infrastructural system. This is not only a transit bridge; it is a focal element for social exchange, it is a kind of narrow square where it is possible to walk, riding a bike, or to take a rest on the wooden surface. This bridge is part of the main building, Multiarena, that is an urban sign, giving a strong character to the area that now is anonymous.
This character means an identity, a social personality since all the functions that are housed there involve social relations: ice rink and sports hall, library, youth and elderly centres, football fields (on Ryssbergen area) and, in front of the Multiarena building, the main square, divided in three parts by various functions and a ground pattern. This new public space will be placed by the foot of the new city Park of J?rlah?jden: from the south it is linked by pedestrian road and bike tracks and from the eastern part of the square the dwelling part with private green areas will be placed as so it will be integrated in the public space, mostly consisting of green spaces and equipped tracks for bikes and people.
There will be two new areas for shopping and a workshop on the south side, close to Nacka Energy building, but a shopping mall is not the only way to create interest in people, instead government and private companies have to collaborate to create a mix of functions that can attract the customers for different reasons. As an example to this the new Museum and conference hall will house not only the traditional activities linked to a museum (bookshop, cafeteria etc.) but even an art school, a dance school, two restaurants and a shopping galleria. The spaces in this building are planned to house various activities so in the future it is possible to change function. In the south east part, we expect to realize an office building 18 floors tall where studios for private professionals, private companies, and social services can be placed.
Visualisations:

(c) urukia.com
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/4302/stockholmnordiccrescent.jpg

(c) urukia.com
http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/4302/stockholmnordiccrescent.jpg

(c) urukia.com
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/4302/stockholmnordiccrescent.jpg

Source: http://www.urukia.com/stockholm-nordic-crescent-by-darc-studio-rosa-topputo

It seems to be an interesting project which probabably would put the level of architure a bit higher.

Svartmetall
July 24th, 2011, 01:13 PM
That does look like an interesting project with architecture that does rather break the mould. Sounds like it also contains an awful lot of community-related activities too making it a real focal point.

Tin_Can
July 24th, 2011, 03:39 PM
Buildings are quite cool :),but judging by those renders landscaping & public areas are a terrible mess. It's almost as if buildings were designed first and then some random bits & pieces of sidewalks,benches etc were thrown in to complete the job.
As a solid,large scale project - bit more work is still needed on designing (which I'm sure,will be done if this project reaches more serious stages of planning)

Muthai
July 27th, 2011, 07:59 AM
^^ +1

Architecture without any urban or landscape planning is just a waste of art. Great architecture needs to be set in an urban or rural context to contribute socially and aesthetically to the surroundings. The built environment should be planned with places and paths first. The buildings should then be designed to support those places and paths, both to shape those spaces and to fill the area with urban content.

The building in this project are looking really cool, but without any good attachments to the surrounding area it's hard to see that it would melt in into the urban context and be a natural part of the area.