View Full Version : SEQ Urban Footprint


JayT
October 28th, 2004, 06:30 AM
Make room for 1 million

http://www.oum.qld.gov.au/Docs/draftplan/Draft_Regional_Plan.pdf <<<Regional Plan!!!!

Craig Johnstone, state editor
October 28, 2004

HIGH-density suburbs, multi-storey apartment blocks and reduced water use will become a feature of southeast Queensland's lifestyle under a growth plan designed to manage one of the biggest population shifts in the nation's history.

SPREADING out . . . a bird's eye view of inner Brisbane, which faces challenges presented by an extra 1 million southeast Queensland residents within 20 years. Picture: Mark Calleja.

The plan, which sets out an urban footprint for Australia's fastest growing region, is likely to force thousands of Queenslanders to turn their backs on the traditional big suburban block.

And the Government is steeling itself to borrow funds to help pay the multibillion-dollar bill for the transport, water and electricity infrastructure needed to cater for an estimated southeast Queensland population of 3.7 million within 20 years.

Premier Peter Beattie and Treasurer Terry Mackenroth unveiled the draft South-East Queensland Regional Plan yesterday.

Mr Mackenroth said the state's strong financial position would enable it to embrace new infrastructure projects which would be outlined in a separate report in April.

The plan estimates more than half-a-million homes, many in medium and high-density apartment developments, will need to be built in southeast Queensland over the next two decades.

It warns that residents may have to reduce the pressure they put on existing infrastructure or face higher charges as a means of ensuring southeast Queensland copes with an expected million new residents.

Mr Beattie indicated there would be some losers from the plan, particularly local cane farmers whose ability to sell their land to developers has been severely restricted.

He also backed a western bypass road for Brisbane, risking a public backlash from residents in the western and northern suburbs.

"We understand the politics of this; this is not a popularity contest, this is about guaranteeing the future quality of life of southeast Queensland residents," Mr Beattie said.

The draft plan, open for public comment until February, seeks to ensure there is enough land for urban growth while protecting about 80 per cent of the region from development.

Residential densities will increase significantly and there will be smaller lots and more apartment blocks along major transport links.

While development will intensify in some areas, others will be locked away for regional landscape, rural production and green space between Brisbane and the Gold and Sunshine Coasts.

The restrictions have left some canegrowers with few options now that their land is not attractive to developers.

New residential estates will have to have a density of up to 15 lots a hectare, compared with eight under existing regulations.

Mr Beattie said the higher densities would mean housing estates would need to have lot sizes about the same as those at Springfield, west of Brisbane, where blocks range from an average 640sq m, or 26 perches, to as small as 300sq m, or 12 perches.

The plan seeks high density residential developments and apartment blocks in suburbs such as Coorparoo, Indooroopilly and Cleveland, a move likely to be hotly debated in the communities.

Lord Mayor Campbell Newman vowed to engage the community in debating the plan. "We will really talk to people about these conflicting forces that are upon us", he said.

Industry groups welcomed the plan as providing certainty although the property lobby said it had concerns about the allocation of funding for needed infrastructure.

http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,3600,391597,00.jpg
SPREADING out . . . a bird's eye view of inner Brisbane, which faces challenges presented by an extra 1 million southeast Queensland residents within 20 years. Picture: Mark Calleja.

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11207224%255E952,00.html
_________________________________________________________________________________
Residential high-rises to shoot up

Craig Johnstone, state editor
28oct04

HIGH-density apartment blocks are likely to spring up in areas such as Coorparoo, Cleveland and Strathpine as the regional plan tries to concentrate residential development around major transport nodes.

The plan proposes several "transit-oriented developments" throughout the region, most of them near major rail and bus stations where it says high-density residential and commercial projects should be built.

Lord Mayor Campbell Newman flagged a relaxation of the 10-storey height limit in Brisbane suburbs to accommodate such development.

The plan says transit-oriented developments should have densities of between 20 and 80 dwellings a hectare, which is likely to encourage big apartment blocks in suburbs that happen to have major train or bus stations.


The plan proposes that such development also be concentrated in corridors running between Bowen Hills and Lutwyche in the north and between Woolloongabba and Greenslopes in the south, to take advantage of the city's burgeoning busway system.

However these proposed new high-density developments around transport centres are likely to prove one of the most contentious aspects of the plan.

Community and resident groups have fiercely resisted past attempts to cluster housing around rail and bus stations.

However the plan warns that continuing to provide low-density detached housing to accommodate the region's increased population is "unsustainable both in terms of land consumption and the cost of providing urban services".

Premier Peter Beattie yesterday said the high-density development did not need to be in the form of high-rise apartments.

"But if we do not do more around transport nodes, we are going to be stuffed," he said.

Cr Newman acknowledged there had been political difficulties in the past convincing people of the need to increase density close to public transport services.

"People don't like density . . . there's been bad development," he said. "We are encouraging quality development. We believe we can create exciting new communities in Brisbane, especially in the urban renewal areas."

He said Brisbane City Council had a 10-storey height limit for buildings outside the CBD but there were parts of the city where he was prepared to see buildings go higher.

Other suburbs identified in the plan as suitable for transit-oriented developments include Indooroopilly, Toowong, Milton, Springwood, Springfield, Goodna, Redbank and Caboolture.
http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11207365%255E3102,00.html
_______________________________________________________________________________
Beattie U-turn on western bypass

Craig Johnstone, state editor
28oct04
PREMIER Peter Beattie yesterday pledged to build a western bypass road to improve traffic flow in southeast Queensland.



In what amounts to an about-face for his Government on the need for a bypass west of Brisbane, Mr Beattie said the road needed to be built to stop the city choking on traffic congestion.

"It's got to happen," he said.

"We have got to find out where to do it, but we have to do it."



The draft regional plan commits the Government to identifying and preserving corridors for "necessary network improvements" in western Brisbane, including the bypass.

The plan also pledges to "complete an orbital road system in Brisbane to complement an overall network of north-south and east-west arterial connections".

Mr Beattie said the western bypass proposal was one of the most controversial parts of the plan but "inevitably it has to happen".

"But if we don't do that then the city chokes," Mr Beattie said.

"The reality is while this is a very difficult political issue, we have to find a solution to it.

"We haven't got a particular timeline in relation to it, but we will do it as soon as we possibly can."

Planning for a western bypass has stalled since it was last proposed by the former Borbidge government in 1997 as part of its regional transport plan.

The Beattie Government had been reluctant to embrace the road because of its potential to cut through several Labor electorates to the west and north of the city.

Other key transport projects proposed by the draft regional plan are heavily geared to encouraging development along the so-called western corridor.

The plan says a new "multi-user infrastructure corridor" including road, rail and other connections would link new industrial areas south of Ipswich with the existing Yatala industrial estate.

It also proposes new public transport corridors to better link the fast-growing Springfield and Ripley Valley areas with Brisbane, as well as an eastern busway and an extended northern busway for Brisbane.

Other high transport priorities the plan identifies include upgrading rail links between Brisbane and the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast. The plan says the Brisbane/Gold Coast line is rapidly approaching capacity and will need to undergo improvements such as a staged duplication, development of new stations and extension of the line south of Robina.

On the Sunshine Coast, the plan says a priority should be providing a "dedicated intra-regional public transport spine" linking the major centres of Caloundra and Maroochydore.

"This could start as bus priority and be used for rail when potential capacity warrants," the plan says.


http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11207300%255E3102,00.html

____________________________________________________________________________________

jt

JayT
October 28th, 2004, 06:35 AM
Footprint for southeast to stretch west

Craig Johnstone, state editor
October 27, 2004

IPSWICH is set to live up to its potential as the "Parramatta of southeast Queensland" with today's release of a new regional plan likely to provide the framework for a jobs and population explosion to the west of Brisbane.


Ipswich City Council is hoping the plan will reflect recent local masterplans which suggest the city and nearby towns will be able to sustain a population of more than 650,000 and about 310,000 jobs in future years.

The plan will detail a new urban footprint for the region, which will regulate future growth but seek to encourage development along the so-called "western corridor" near Springfield and the Ripley Valley.

However, some parts of the region will be locked away from development to preserve dwindling green open space and contain urban sprawl.

And inner city living is set to increase in density, particularly near public transport nodes.

The regional plan, to be released by Premier Peter Beattie, Planning Minister Terry Mackenroth and Brisbane Lord Mayor Campbell Newman this morning, will influence almost all future development in the state's southeast, the fastest-growing region in Australia, over the next 20 years.

Existing development rights will remain under the plan, but the Government has signalled it will stop development projects that it deems unsuitable for the urban footprint.

The draft plan will be open for public comment until February before the Government settles on a final plan by the middle of next year.

The Government promised to draw up the new approach to planning policy following a series of critical articles in The Courier-Mail last year highlighting the lack of attention given to proper urban planning in the region.

Southeast Queensland is expected to attract more than one million new residents over the next 15 years, increasing pressure on land availability and infrastructure such as roads and water supply.

Ipswich Mayor Paul Pisasale said yesterday his council had planned extensively for growth in and around the city.

"We are about making sure that we are part of the solution in southeast Queensland," he said.

However, the mayors of the 18 local councils in southeast Queensland remain concerned about the Government's willingness to include their input in the draft plan.

Cr Newman, who is also chairman of the Southeast Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils, said local government had not had the opportunity to peruse the plan.

Local mayors received a short briefing on the plan on Monday but it included few details about where the urban footprint would extend in the region and what limitations would be put on future development.

Mr Mackenroth has insisted the 84-page plan will be about managing rather than limiting growth in southeast Queensland.

However, he has already rebuffed attempts by the development lobby to have the plan reviewed every three years and has indicated that some rural landholders hoping to sell up to developers will be unhappy with the details of the plan.
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11198375%255E3102,00.html

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid144/pfab67a7f560ab102cdd2c11fe2581654/f67a4703.jpg
Potential urban areas in Yellow - see pdf for bigger map on first post.

________________________________________________________________________________
jt

AtD
October 28th, 2004, 07:18 AM
lol JayT is spamming over time after that article in AFR.

zztopless
October 28th, 2004, 09:03 AM
lol JayT is spamming over time after that article in AFR.

Er, dude, this is pretty big news up here. Front cover of the Courier Mail, was on the 6 o'clock news etc, and people are talking about it.

Orfeo
October 28th, 2004, 11:17 AM
^
Not to mention that it was the main story of the Australian....(site (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/))

barneybuck
October 28th, 2004, 12:05 PM
^
Not to mention that it was the main story of the Australian....(site (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/))
As an aside.
Does anyone actually buy the Australian? I know in Melbourne its lucky to sell 40,000 a day compared to the HUN at over 500,000 and the Age 200,000.

Jimmy James
October 28th, 2004, 12:29 PM
Yes I reading about this in the Australian today - it was front page stuff, it's good to see Beattie getting serious about this - a lot of commentary I've been reading today talks about how Sydney is choking under it's own weight with water and transport problems, and how Beattie is keen to avoid the same problems down the track.

ABS
October 28th, 2004, 12:51 PM
It's about time the qld state government got serious about a regional plan and it's great that one has arrived. People can complain about issues with the regional plan, but fundamentally for the first time in SEQ history he have a regional plan!!! :D

Aussie Bhoy
October 28th, 2004, 01:05 PM
If they would just get it together and improve the rail network I'd be happy. This is the time to do it.

A subway in central Brisbane, and more lines out to the new suburbs.

JayT
October 29th, 2004, 01:19 AM
In today's paper they said they will be increasing heights in suburbs to above 15 stories and that several places would be getting high density apartments.

Abbotsford Road in Bowen Hills (where I live) is to become a highrise enclave as well as Wollongabba, and Milton. It also said that highrise hubs would be created around Cleveland, Carindale, Garden City, Chermside, Strathpine and Springwood.

jt

JayT
October 29th, 2004, 01:42 AM
You'll never need to go into the city
Chris Griffith, City Hall reporter
29oct04
URBAN hubs where people work, sleep and play will transform Brisbane from a CBD-dependent city to a more decentralised 21st century metropolis under the draft South-East Queensland Regional Plan.



Planners see the new Brisbane as adopting the ideas of Vancouver in Canada and the Pearl District of Portland, Oregon, where rail, bus and road corridors or hubs absorb the growth, and lower-density housing in established non-corridor areas is preserved.

Lord Mayor Campbell Newman said there was no need to sacrifice low-density housing in the sleepier suburbs to accommodate an extra 140,000 dwellings.

"We can accommodate the required growth in greenfield areas such as Rochedale and Fitzgibbon, and in urban renewal areas we can accommodate higher density," Cr Newman said.

"There will be huge areas of Brisbane that will remain low-density residential over the next 20 years; the low-medium regions along the transport corridors can take the required targets."

The SEQ plan identifies the Brisbane area's six principal hubs as Chermside, Indooroopilly, Carindale, Cleveland, Upper Mt Gravatt and Springwood.

Toombul, Toowong, Wynnum Central, Capalaba and Goodna follow closely behind as major urban centres.

"I see them as mixes of residential-retail places for people to work and places for people to enjoy recreation," Cr Newman said.

He said developers building in these corridors would work in partnership with the council to build "social infrastructure" such as parkland and recreational areas.

He said the 10-storey limit on high-rise outside the CBD no doubt would rise, but rise tastefully.

"You could have a 15-storey building that's a shocker, you could have a 17-storey building that was a delight to the eyes," Cr Newman said.

He cited Abbotsford, Bowen Hills, Woolloongabba and Milton between Coronation Drive and the railway as likely locations for such high-rise.

But not everyone would work and live in hubs: The CBD would still be "the vibrant heart" of Brisbane.

The SEQ plan's success would depend on these hubs attracting their share of government offices, commerce, legal firms, and business to make them work centres as well as residential ones.

Planning Institute of Australia spokesman Gary White said the redevelopment of Racecourse Rd, Hamilton, and Stones Corner showed new infrastructure could attract not only shoppers but business, commerce, medium residential and community.

Mr White said retail centres such as Garden City which incorporated cinemas and libraries were trying to create that mix.

It could be attractive for some CBD firms to move to hubs which offered better parking, better choice in transport, and cheaper rent.

Another key to success was fast transit – rail or light rail – between hubs.

http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,1658,391837,00.jpg
BRISBANE . . . urban hubs where residents work and sleep will decentralise the city. Picture: Mark Calleja
http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,11215320%255E3102,00.html
_______________________________________________________________________________
I noticed that urban hubs do not take the emphasis away from Brisbane's CBD. The whole reason why Brisbane is so busy is because people use it every day. If these hubs are created we could end up like Sydney or Melbourne where people do not visit the city for years on end. Could end up being alot quieter down town - just a thought.

jt

Jimmy James
October 29th, 2004, 11:12 AM
It's a great idea, most of the companies I worked for in Brisbane were in the suburbs, but in order to do it they need to get the transport right, including express services between Hubs, Canberra style. In fact Canberra is one of the few places where this decentralisation truly works!

JayT
October 31st, 2004, 10:51 AM
http://www.oum.qld.gov.au/?id=105
Above is a link to another interestig website - the office of urban management. Here you will find interactive maps that you can basically zero down to property level - you can find your house!!!

jt

jacobsian
October 31st, 2004, 09:29 PM
I couldn't find my house on it.

TOCC
November 1st, 2004, 10:11 AM
anyway, this is proabaly 10yrs late, but then again better late then never....this will be one of the most influential reforms and decisions for Brisbane in years to come.

GMAC
November 2nd, 2004, 07:52 AM
Fantastic News this is!!! Decentralisation and Transport is definitely the key and I agree with Jimmy James that Canberra is the best example of how this can work extremely effectively in Australia. All it takes is really good planning and it looks like we have the first step.

TOCC
November 2nd, 2004, 09:28 AM
yeah fortunately brisbane hasnt left it too late, there is still possible ways to build new infastructure and theres still plenty of bushland to preserve. It will be 5 or so years before we really begin to see the impact of this decision, Theres still quite a few estates and developments which have already begun the clearing on bushland and already gained approval.

New transport routes and new forms of transport in exisisting areas will take a 4 or so years before reasonable proposals arise.

JayT
November 2nd, 2004, 09:40 AM
yeah fortunately brisbane hasnt left it too late, there is still possible ways to build new infastructure and theres still plenty of bushland to preserve. It will be 5 or so years before we really begin to see the impact of this decision, Theres still quite a few estates and developments which have already begun the clearing on bushland and already gained approval.

New transport routes and new forms of transport in exisisting areas will take a 4 or so years before reasonable proposals arise.

Brisbane is densifying in a way - just not in the right places. Take Sydney for example, they are light years ahead of us and all their major suburban CBD's are on transport nodes. In the future Sydney will run like clockwork because they have planned for the future.

Densify around hubs and connect them with each other - similar to Parramatta and Chatswood. I can see a time when all of Sydney's mini suburban CBD's are interconnected with each other.

jt

Mr MacPhisto
November 7th, 2004, 04:46 AM
Beaudesert Shire Council is delighted we have been designated one of only two major rural development centres (along with Gatton).