trainrover
December 14th, 2011, 01:25 AM
Today's http://www.skyscrapercity.com/images/icons/icon1.gif:The uncertain future of Angell woods in Beaconsfield -- 12'12"
"...We're not developers per se; we're not ... we're not ready to develop the land ourselves at this point..." -- 5'05" (http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2176277800)I mildly expected the journalist to rebut "developers" with 'speculators' ... oh well.
orThe uncertain future of Angell woods in Beaconsfield (http://www.cbc.ca/daybreakmontreal/2011/12/the-uncertain-future-of-angell-woods-in-beaconsfield.html)
"...We're not developers per se; we're not ... we're not ready to develop the land ourselves at this point..." -- 5'05" (http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2176277800)I mildly expected the journalist to rebut "developers" with 'speculators' ... oh well.
orThe uncertain future of Angell woods in Beaconsfield (http://www.cbc.ca/daybreakmontreal/2011/12/the-uncertain-future-of-angell-woods-in-beaconsfield.html)