View Full Version : 1 George Street (23 floors)


Pages : [1] 2

Cliff
December 5th, 2002, 05:23 AM
They are destroying the Pidemco Centre - a huge office building in Raffles Place, only half of the building is left, I'm soo sad
http://www.sky.s64.pl/home/W/Sing2/s36.jpg
The short one in the middle

ShangHigh
December 5th, 2002, 08:17 AM
I know that building. Why do they do that, it is quite new I think ?

heirloom
December 5th, 2002, 03:13 PM
what's there to be sad about? it's short, and it's no architectural marvel... let it be gone.... *poof*

rico
December 5th, 2002, 04:25 PM
maybe they'll replace it with a bigger and better building... most likely a skyscraper. :angel1:

ryanr
December 5th, 2002, 04:37 PM
I know having sleek, new and tall skyscrapers are cool but yeah, i kinda do feel sad when old, classic buildings get teared down for them....Its much better if they build in an open lot:D

Just like Insular life....a classic

RafflesCity
December 6th, 2002, 10:12 PM
Thats very weird they should demolish it..I thought it was refurbished in the nineties?

They gonna build something there or what?

Fabian
December 6th, 2002, 10:39 PM
A big waste of money to refurbish a tower only to have it pulled down shortly. It looked had been built in recent times. It stilll had a long life.

baqthier
December 7th, 2002, 09:26 AM
most likely another skyscraper or maybe another durian :D

CrazyKing
December 7th, 2002, 01:39 PM
Hey, don't be sad... Once all buildings die, and new, improved ones get built... :okay:

Cliff
December 9th, 2002, 06:54 AM
A 23 storey building called 1 George St will be built over Pidemco Centre.

TYW
December 9th, 2002, 03:39 PM
taller buildings huh?? soon S'pore will have the whole city's buildings @ 280m

RafflesCity
December 9th, 2002, 09:17 PM
Personally I feel that if they demolish it, they should rename the new building Pidemco Centre as well.

TYW
December 10th, 2002, 03:44 AM
Originally posted by RafflesCity
Personally I feel that if they demolish it, they should rename the new building Pidemco Centre as well.

yeah!!

freson
December 14th, 2002, 01:22 AM
what will be built there???

Cliff
December 15th, 2002, 02:27 PM
Let me repeat:
A 23 storey building called 1 George St will be built over Pidemco Centre.

:)

TYW
December 16th, 2002, 02:12 PM
any pics of 1 George st. ??

Cliff
December 16th, 2002, 02:40 PM
It's on the fence of the demolition site, I can't find any pics on the net. But it's all covered with glass.

TYW
December 18th, 2002, 03:57 AM
<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by Cliff </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>It's on the fence of the demolition site, I can't find any pics on the net. But it's all covered with glass.</td></tr>
</table>

wow!! must be cool

Pablo
December 18th, 2002, 09:07 AM
how many meters it has:?

TYW
December 20th, 2002, 02:54 PM
<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by Pablo </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>how many meters it has:?</td></tr>
</table>

at 23 stories, i think not more than 100m

heirloom
December 20th, 2002, 09:35 PM
i hope it'll be as grand / extravagant as parkview square....

RafflesCity
April 25th, 2003, 06:26 PM
huaiwei, do you have any renderings of this one? I noticed that Pidemco Ctr has been completely demolished (including the internet cafe that I went to:bleep: )

@heirloom, I dont think a gaudy looking building like Parkview Square will go up in that business-class looking district..seems too fanciful. But u never know....:cool:

huaiwei
April 25th, 2003, 06:39 PM
Hm..not yet..although you might find it in Capitaland's website. I actually saw it being demolished to my great surprise, because the following press article appeared just a few days afterwards:

Pidemco Centre gives way to $190m building

SINCE the early 1980s, it has been a landmark in Singapore's central business district. Now, all that's left of it is rubble.

The site used to house Pidemco Centre, which has now been renamed 1 George Street. A new $190-million building is expected to be launched on the site over the next few months.

Sources said CapitaLand and German insurance giant Ergo, the owners of the building, are planning to launch and market the project in the first half of the year.

'But this still depends on the economy and the outcome of the situation in Iraq,' said one source.

According to CapitaLand's website, the building is targeted to be completed by October next year.

The new 23-storey office building will be clad in a modern steel and glass frame, and is expected to have a lettable area of around 440,000 sq ft to 450,000 sq ft.

It will also have a 'sky garden' on its upper floors complete with landscaping and a swimming pool.

Many Singaporeans remember the distinctive Pidemco Centre as the former premises of the old Immigration Department.

It was also the former flagship site of Pidemco Land, which merged in 2000 with DBS Land to form CapitaLand. --Vladimir Guevarra

RafflesCity
April 25th, 2003, 06:43 PM
So is it under construction now or what?
Sounds pretty fast to put up a new building..anyways since it will be taller than good for the skyline:guns1:

heirloom
April 25th, 2003, 06:51 PM
no pics yet? maybe it'll be sleeeeek like the gatewayyyy

Cliff
May 1st, 2003, 02:52 PM
I've seen the picture at the consruction site, and it's like NTUC Centre, only shorter.:)

huaiwei
May 20th, 2003, 01:33 AM
Finally I found the picture:

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/mainbuilding.gif

"Designed by renowned architects Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, this new age financial centre is set to grace the Singapore skyline in 2004. It is the ideal platform to take your company to the next level."

RafflesCity
May 21st, 2003, 04:07 PM
It has that typical SOM boxy-look but thank goodness for those voids..hope it will be spectacular.:guns1:

huaiwei
May 21st, 2003, 09:56 PM
Like wat cliff said...it looks like a cheap copy of One Marina Boulevard (NTUC). One is more then enough. :)

Cliff
November 23rd, 2003, 04:07 AM
At least it's on theo ther side of the skyline:D

It seems to me that Singapore is getting more and more SOM buildings...:)

huaiwei
November 23rd, 2003, 08:52 AM
Originally posted by Cliff

At least it's on theo ther side of the skyline:D

It seems to me that Singapore is getting more and more SOM buildings...:) We once had more of less the same architects for our three needles. Now we have another group of them designing our mid-rises. We seem to be a city of clones. Help!!! :rant: :D

RafflesCity
November 23rd, 2003, 03:23 PM
Any construction pics?

These massing models show how it is expected to look like. Seems rather huge.

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/504/103city9.jpg
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/504/103city2.jpg

And Cliff, whats that building taller than the OCBC that was proposed called Union House?

huaiwei
November 23rd, 2003, 03:49 PM
Eh...what union house??

BTW, from the model it seems as thou this new building will rise almost as high as Pickering Operations Complex. That would put it at almost 200m or so.

RafflesCity
November 23rd, 2003, 03:52 PM
Originally posted by huaiwei

Eh...what union house??

BTW, from the model it seems as thou this new building will rise almost as high as Pickering Operations Complex. That would put it at almost 200m or so.

Union House in SSP Singapore diagrams.

200m? cannot be lah..UOB is 280m and this one isnt even half of that which is 140m:D

huaiwei
November 23rd, 2003, 03:56 PM
Originally posted by RafflesCity

Union House in SSP Singapore diagrams.

200m? cannot be lah..UOB is 280m and this one isnt even half of that which is 140m:D Er...paiseh pasieh.....I suddenly remember it was OCBC at 200m...not Pickering! :D

Well, there were some strange and unknown entries in SSP, not just Union House. I remember there is one OUB thingy too?

rEXxx
November 24th, 2003, 04:52 AM
i remember seeing the model, the height and shape of the new building pretty much the same as the old pidemco. which is why im still calling it a "building", and not a "tower".

I think the architecture is fantastic, reminds me of one of those super high-end, loft-like exclusive developments in london.

PS: S'pore has a bad bad (...or good good!,hehe) habit of destroying building that are still modern looking and functional eh? eg: Pidemco, The Promenade, Orchard Point ...

huaiwei
November 24th, 2003, 11:49 AM
Hm...I do thik Pidemco is abit too new to redevelop. Then again, I wont want a century old building to be destroyed either would I? :D The Promenade is ok...it was basicallly just being swallowed by its bigger neighbour...Orchard Point was demolished??

huaiwei
December 9th, 2003, 07:05 AM
BTW I found the official site for this building here:

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/index.htm

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/logo_main.gif
http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/mainbuilding.gif

Combining an excellent location, a world-class design and quality customer service, One George Street is easily in a class of its own. An address with distinction, this premier office development is the latest offering from Capitaland Ltd and the Ergo Insurance Group.

Together, this experienced partnership has succeeded in providing a secure, productive and unique office space that is One George Street – the benchmark for future offices to come.
Designed by renowned architects Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, this new age financial centre is set to grace the Singapore skyline in 2004. It is the ideal platform to take your company to the next level.

huaiwei
December 9th, 2003, 07:07 AM
One Choice Office Location

Built on the site of the former Pidemco Centre, One George Street is closely linked to local transport and nearby leisure areas within the prime commercial district. Within walking distance are the Raffles Place and Clarke Quay MRT stations as well as a selection of shopping and dining conveniences.

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/locationmap.gif

huaiwei
December 9th, 2003, 07:13 AM
One Excellent Service Level

Be assured that you will be well taken care of at One George Street. We understand the needs of a commercial business and are ready to ensure that your business space is as what it should be.

Starting from enquiry to placement and continuing throughout the length of your lease tenure, we are fully dedicated to serve you every step of the way. We also provide you with tools such as an intelligent building management system and a 24-hour customer service hub.

One Unique Office Building

Designed with your needs in mind, One George Street has integrated recreational and commercial facilities to produce an office building with a difference. Large efficient floor plates, dedicated trading floor, private lobbies, panoramic views and beautifully landscaped sky gardens are just some of the unique features of this premium office building. An infinity-edge swimming pool and gymnasium are also located within the building for you to recharge yourself at the end of the day.

One George Street is the ultimate platform for your business lifestyle.

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneuuni_p.jpg
Unique Design

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneuspec_p.jpg
Grand Arrival Area

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneupri_p.jpg
Private Lobbies

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneuoff_p.jpg
Large Office Floors

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneusky_p.jpg
Sky Gardens

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneusw_p.jpg
Swimming Pool

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/subimageoneugym_p.jpg
Gymnasium

Cliff
December 9th, 2003, 09:42 AM
Wow! It looks really good!
I don't know anything about Union House, Rawin S. drew that, we'll have to ask him, but he never visits the forums.

How does The Promenade look like?

huaiwei
December 9th, 2003, 01:08 PM
The Promenade? I tot it got swallowed up by the Paragon?

RafflesCity
December 9th, 2003, 11:48 PM
Ready in 2004? Anyone seen anything under construction?

redstone
December 10th, 2003, 09:06 AM
Ah ,yes ,the Pidemco Centre.I remember you'll have to apply/renew your ICs/Passports/work permits there.It was until 1997 that it moved to the SIR Building ,later renamed the ICA Building.

It has a very big atrium ,with an indoor garden ,fountains and a waterfall.On the ceiling hangs some modern chandeliers.
http://picas.nhb.gov.sg/data/tn_pcd/19990000093-8269-3262-1111/img0106.jpg
You can see the giagantic atrium on the right of this picture.

Cliff
December 10th, 2003, 10:46 AM
Wow! It looks like a hotel!!

RafflesCity
December 26th, 2003, 01:57 PM
Rising off the ground.

Dec 26 2003

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/103gs2.jpg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/103gs.jpg

RafflesCity
January 25th, 2004, 01:18 PM
1st January 2004

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/103gstreet.jpg

huaiwei
January 28th, 2004, 08:40 AM
It looks so ugly while being built! :D

RafflesCity
January 28th, 2004, 05:22 PM
Originally posted by huaiwei

It looks so ugly while being built! :D

Dont worry..I am sure you will change your mind once they start putting glass panels on it:colgate: Anyway have you passed by there lately? Wonder how much it has progressed.

huaiwei
January 28th, 2004, 05:56 PM
Originally posted by RafflesCity

Dont worry..I am sure you will change your mind once they start putting glass panels on it:colgate: Anyway have you passed by there lately? Wonder how much it has progressed. We shall see man. A boring box jolly well be taller to impress me! :D

I have not passed by there yet so far, so no updates for now.

huaiwei
February 29th, 2004, 10:57 AM
Updates on 25/02/2004

http://extranet.emporis.com/files/transfer/6/2004/02/246653.jpg
View up from the west corner

http://extranet.emporis.com/files/transfer/6/2004/02/246654.jpg
View up from north corner

redstone
February 29th, 2004, 03:37 PM
Btw ,The Promenade is the building that looks like a huge loaf of bread?White ,smooth and windowless???

huaiwei
February 29th, 2004, 03:50 PM
The Promenade is in Orchard isnt it?

heirloom
February 29th, 2004, 04:11 PM
and is now part of paragon..

huaiwei
February 29th, 2004, 04:14 PM
And it was paragon which looked more like a windowless box at that time?

RafflesCity
March 1st, 2004, 12:36 AM
Originally posted by huaiwei

And it was paragon which looked more like a windowless box at that time?

Yup it was a huge white box. Thank goodness for the facelift!

btw do your pics make the building seem bigger, or has it really progressed that much?

RafflesCity
March 10th, 2004, 07:49 PM
This pic by baq shows the lift core sticking out. Still quite a bit more to go.
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/2/9sgcbdwalk1.jpg

RafflesCity
April 3rd, 2004, 05:08 AM
March 28, 2004

http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/gs283.jpg

http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/gs283b.jpg

http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/gs29.jpg

heirloom
April 3rd, 2004, 05:52 AM
i find the last pic qutie amusing with the old boat tailing the new one.. quite cute...

RafflesCity
April 6th, 2004, 04:36 PM
lol..I find it interesting cos of how it intimidates the shophouses behind, like a monster rising, but still with the same theme of old vs new.

heirloom
April 6th, 2004, 04:44 PM
it's amazing how big the new buildings look comapred to the shophouses... when most of us would actually consider those new buildings to be 'short'

RafflesCity
April 6th, 2004, 05:07 PM
yup...but this one is obscenely FAT. Even at the URA you could already tell. I wished they had gone for slimmer and taller but I guess they wanted to fully maximise the space on the former Pidemco Centre.

heirloom
April 6th, 2004, 05:11 PM
is there a low height limit for that site?

RafflesCity
April 6th, 2004, 05:27 PM
No idea, but I really see no real reason since you already have tall blocks like Singtel there. Maybe it has something to do with the shophouses? Or they dont want a massive thing by the road edge.

huaiwei
April 6th, 2004, 05:36 PM
No idea, but I really see no real reason since you already have tall blocks like Singtel there. Maybe it has something to do with the shophouses? Or they dont want a massive thing by the road edge.
This building cant be tall tall lah.....or else we will have a rather strange ending to the right of the skyline when seen from the swissotel! :D

RafflesCity
April 7th, 2004, 08:09 AM
Perhaps. Our skyline has a mountain shape when seen from that angle. Goes up then goes down :yes:

heirloom
April 7th, 2004, 10:52 AM
we will need a 600m building and gradually shorter buildings around it to make a real mountain :)

huaiwei
April 7th, 2004, 01:58 PM
We can call ours a ridge then? :D

heirloom
April 7th, 2004, 02:13 PM
ridge is long and thin right... ridge would be hk perhaps... singapore... maybe.. um.. escarpment? actually ont really... a little bit lar.. hrmmmmmm you're the geography guy you should know

huaiwei
April 7th, 2004, 02:50 PM
Ridge loh....from Raffles Place to Shenton Way wat :D

heirloom
April 7th, 2004, 03:32 PM
oh okok

RafflesCity
April 7th, 2004, 03:43 PM
what on earth is an escarpment?

heirloom
April 7th, 2004, 03:46 PM
a fusion dish of carp and escargot :hahano:



from what i remember... it's land with low gradient on one side and very steep gradient on the other.. something like that

huaiwei
April 7th, 2004, 03:53 PM
I chunked my geography out of the window. :D

RafflesCity
April 24th, 2004, 09:45 AM
24 April 2004

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/ssc1819/gs24.jpg

huaiwei
April 24th, 2004, 03:40 PM
You are running around in the city again! :D

RafflesCity
April 24th, 2004, 11:39 PM
yup..felt restless this morning and also the weather was great and cool as it rained earlier.

I had originally planned to take shophouses at Balestier for redstone but ended up in town again :D

huaiwei
April 25th, 2004, 02:03 PM
IC....I should be running around with my camera too this coming week. And on sat, I am defnitely going to go after the OMB....I just hope there is not a big crowd then...

RafflesCity
April 25th, 2004, 08:55 PM
from where do you plan to photograph OMB? Dont think it will be too crowded as its not really a public event.

huaiwei
April 25th, 2004, 08:59 PM
from where do you plan to photograph OMB? Dont think it will be too crowded as its not really a public event.
Should be from the Explanade area.....I suppose that is where all the action will be anyway...:D

baqthier
May 8th, 2004, 03:01 AM
Aerial :)

http://img51.photobucket.com/albums/v157/baqthier/23storeysg.jpg

heirloom
May 8th, 2004, 03:59 AM
where was that from? construction sites look so scarily complicated

baqthier
May 8th, 2004, 09:06 AM
where was that from? construction sites look so scarily complicated
Swissotel ;)
Design is similar to that of NTUC. NTUC's construction was also like this, right?

huaiwei
May 8th, 2004, 10:00 PM
Swissotel ;)
Design is similar to that of NTUC. NTUC's construction was also like this, right?
The hole seems familiar, but this one is so much fatter and shorter! :D

RafflesCity
May 9th, 2004, 10:19 PM
Obscenely fat. I think it hasnt reached its full height yet. In that pic you can see they are making the void on the left.

huaiwei
May 9th, 2004, 10:37 PM
Comparing to the rendering..

http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/mainbuilding.gif

It looks like it has quite a number of floors to go?

RafflesCity
May 11th, 2004, 02:16 PM
The top looks like it could be brightly lit up at night. If so that would be great :cool:

heirloom
May 11th, 2004, 02:46 PM
looks like a tennis court!

huaiwei
May 11th, 2004, 06:11 PM
Hahaha...but anyway....buildings that light up at night usually need egoistic owners. :D

heirloom
May 11th, 2004, 07:25 PM
no leh... sometimes just wanna showcase architecture mar...

huaiwei
May 11th, 2004, 08:18 PM
no leh... sometimes just wanna showcase architecture mar...
But lighting can also destory architecture...it is an art to do the lighting properly! :)

heirloom
May 12th, 2004, 03:13 AM
of course :) i'm assuming they WOULD do it properly..

RafflesCity
May 12th, 2004, 10:56 PM
The Great Eastern behind it looks great lighted up at night.

heirloom
May 13th, 2004, 01:15 AM
never noticed.. got pic?

RafflesCity
May 14th, 2004, 06:12 PM
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/503/103dscn0162a.jpg

:cool:

huaiwei
May 15th, 2004, 04:14 AM
Nicely lit up for a shorty building. :D

heirloom
May 15th, 2004, 06:30 AM
nicely lit for a not so nice building :)

huaiwei
May 15th, 2004, 06:45 AM
nicely lit for a not so nice building :)
Muaha...actually it looks ok. Just that it will be overshadowed once 1GS is finished.

RafflesCity
June 8th, 2004, 11:34 PM
Yup it will. In this massing model it will be very wide, looks wider than OCBC. You can also see the future development at Clarke Quay.
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/504/103DSCN2093.jpg

heirloom
June 9th, 2004, 03:48 AM
what future development?

RafflesCity
June 9th, 2004, 11:31 PM
what future development?

SOHO@Central

RafflesCity
June 27th, 2004, 07:34 PM
27 June 2004

http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/gs27.jpg

huaiwei
June 28th, 2004, 06:23 AM
The shophouses look like they are having a monster rising behind them!

heirloom
June 28th, 2004, 10:38 AM
nah... it's no monster.. the shophouses are just midgets.

redstone
June 28th, 2004, 11:20 AM
Looks very huge, just like the new Library.But ain't 23 floors very short?It does not seem profitable.Some height restriction again?

redstone
June 28th, 2004, 11:23 AM
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/504/103DSCN2093.jpg
Is that the Pickering beside it?

heirloom
June 28th, 2004, 11:28 AM
yep

RafflesCity
June 28th, 2004, 12:43 PM
It is big! If you look at it from the wide side that is.

Heres a closer look at the base

28 June 2004

http://img43.photobucket.com/albums/v133/RafflesCity/gs28.jpg

heirloom
June 28th, 2004, 12:51 PM
yeah but quite short...

RafflesCity
June 28th, 2004, 12:55 PM
but compared to the former Pidemco Centre this will be more visible and contribute more to the skyline :yes:

redstone
June 28th, 2004, 04:21 PM
Imagine had it been as tall or even taller than Big Three. :cool:

huaiwei
June 28th, 2004, 04:39 PM
That will really throw the balance of the skyline off if it gets too tall. But even for its height, it does seem a tad too massive?

redstone
June 28th, 2004, 04:43 PM
Well, our skyline looks like a mountain, is very deep but only a few skyscrapers wide.

huaiwei
June 28th, 2004, 04:55 PM
So it dosent make much sense to have a monster scraper at the very edge of it.

redstone
June 28th, 2004, 04:58 PM
What I was trying to say is that its about time to widen the mountain towards Chinatown be building taller ones.

heirloom
June 28th, 2004, 05:11 PM
i think one day if there's a 281m skyscraper in sg you will hyperventilate for 5 days, redstone :)

redstone
June 28th, 2004, 05:13 PM
It would for everyone here.:)

RafflesCity
July 2nd, 2004, 12:05 PM
30 June 2004

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/ssc1819/gs30.jpg

heirloom
July 2nd, 2004, 12:59 PM
is that clear glass we see lower down th ebuilding?! :!

RafflesCity
July 10th, 2004, 11:02 AM
hmmm..might be but I couldnt tell for sure although that looks like the facade

RafflesCity
July 10th, 2004, 11:31 AM
10 July 2004

the view of the wide side

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/ssc1819/gs10.jpg

redstone
July 10th, 2004, 12:46 PM
What's with the blue 'bridge' at the top?

heirloom
July 10th, 2004, 05:12 PM
that's just something like an observatory post for the construction is it? dunno but i see it in most constructions.

RafflesCity
July 11th, 2004, 12:25 AM
what blue bridge? I think its just the top of the core box...

huaiwei
July 11th, 2004, 12:34 PM
Poor great Eastern.....it got all its view blocked! :D

redstone
July 11th, 2004, 02:48 PM
The GE is actually pretty amazing.Neo-Classical-Revival. :cool:

RafflesCity
July 12th, 2004, 06:42 PM
12 July 2004

http://img43.exs.cx/img43/9603/gs12.jpg

RafflesCity
July 17th, 2004, 01:27 PM
17 July 2004

http://img15.exs.cx/img15/7017/gs17.jpg

http://img15.exs.cx/img15/9607/gs17a.jpg

redstone
July 17th, 2004, 03:55 PM
The blue bridge hadn't raised a bit.That's the top?

RafflesCity
July 17th, 2004, 04:03 PM
I'm not sure if it has reached its maximum height yet, but you can see theyre building the floors at least up to the top of that 'blue bridge'

redstone
July 17th, 2004, 04:04 PM
What on earth is the bridge for anyway?It has been there since a few months after construction.

RafflesCity
July 23rd, 2004, 12:39 PM
23 July 2004

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs23.jpg

I'm beginning to like the facade, has some texture to it
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs23a.jpg

High cutaway space at the base
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs23b.jpg

huaiwei
July 23rd, 2004, 04:54 PM
Woah not bad! The second picture looks interesting because it is quite a contrast with the shophouses beside it. :D

heirloom
July 23rd, 2004, 06:00 PM
that 'bridge' rises together with the structure...

RafflesCity
July 24th, 2004, 07:08 PM
of all the projects here, I'd say this one rose pretty fast! It was just like yesterday when Cliff made the first post saying Pidemco Centre was getting demolished and now this has totally replaced it.

RafflesCity
July 31st, 2004, 02:43 PM
31 July 2004

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs31.jpg

redstone
July 31st, 2004, 03:54 PM
Did the building rise?

huaiwei
July 31st, 2004, 04:04 PM
I dont noe, but I still dunno why some of you are so pre-occupied with a "bridge" which dosent exist?

redstone
July 31st, 2004, 04:07 PM
What doesn't exist???

I mean the blue-stripe thing at the top...

huaiwei
July 31st, 2004, 04:11 PM
Whats so special about it? Its just something which shifts upwards as the core rises. Its not like its anything of significance?

redstone
July 31st, 2004, 04:15 PM
I want to know what on earth it is for.

RafflesCity
July 31st, 2004, 04:29 PM
That 'bridge' may be just there to protect the top of the core? I think the top of that 'bridge' is the maximum height of the building. Now, they are just adding the floorplates till they reach the top.

You can also see facade being installed just above the void in the building's side.
I really like the facade!
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs31.jpg

redstone
July 31st, 2004, 04:30 PM
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs23.jpg
Was this taken on the same floor as the last one?

RafflesCity
July 31st, 2004, 04:42 PM
Yes!

redstone
July 31st, 2004, 04:45 PM
Well, then this shows that it had risen!:)

huaiwei
July 31st, 2004, 05:01 PM
Yes it does rise...that thingy on top is actually some kind of "mini factory" which builds onto the solid concrete if I am not wrong. Isnt it a common feature in just about any similarly built building?

redstone
July 31st, 2004, 05:03 PM
So it is the mould for the core?

huaiwei
July 31st, 2004, 05:07 PM
So it is the mould for the core?
Duno leh...maybe its a mini factory chunning out concrete like a tumour churning out cancerous cells? :D

RafflesCity
August 3rd, 2004, 09:51 AM
3 August 2004

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs3.jpg

redstone
August 3rd, 2004, 09:59 AM
Wow, what a contrast!!! :eek:

huaiwei
August 3rd, 2004, 10:36 AM
That is a lovely view indeed! :eek: Hopefully it never gets completed.

RafflesCity
August 3rd, 2004, 10:39 AM
Huh?

Weird taste!

I want it to be completed asap so I can see the facade :cool:

huaiwei
August 3rd, 2004, 10:49 AM
Muahaha....it looks really cool staying uncompleted....looks as starkly bold as the shophouses in front! :D

redstone
August 3rd, 2004, 10:51 AM
Just imagine the contrasts when the great big UFO rises behind our Grand Beauty the Supreme Court!:D

huaiwei
August 3rd, 2004, 10:54 AM
I dont want to think about that one....I just hope it collapses before completion! :D

BTW, the facade will be consistant throughout for this one?

redstone
August 3rd, 2004, 10:57 AM
Looks so in the rendering.

Btw it looks like a compressed version of NTUC, with areas 'cut out' from the sides!:D

RafflesCity
August 13th, 2004, 03:28 PM
13 August 2004

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs138.jpg

huaiwei
August 13th, 2004, 04:17 PM
Not much changes since the previous one?

redstone
August 13th, 2004, 04:29 PM
It rose a lot.:)

RafflesCity
August 21st, 2004, 01:58 PM
Not much changes since the previous one?

yes, changes are a little harder to detect as the structure is levelling off, or maybe cos the photos are taken at short intervals :)

RafflesCity
August 21st, 2004, 01:59 PM
21 August 2004

watch the cladding rise
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs218.jpg

heirloom
August 21st, 2004, 02:28 PM
uh... it rose three quarters of a level? singtel building looks like a sandcastle :D

RafflesCity
August 21st, 2004, 02:42 PM
dunno, but the cladding is really obvious if you approach the building from the fat angle.

and how does singtel building look like a sandcastle with its metallic appearance?

if u want to see a sandcastle-like building, look for that hotel in Amman (somewhere in the ROT Asia section)

heirloom
August 21st, 2004, 03:31 PM
ok.. maybe fort or something.. or a vertical great wall.. the relatively massive flatness of the façade with very small windows make it look like that lor..

RafflesCity
August 28th, 2004, 02:36 PM
28 August 2004

Doesnt look very exciting from this angle
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs288.jpg

heirloom
August 28th, 2004, 02:39 PM
well at least look better than high street centre

RafflesCity
September 1st, 2004, 03:46 PM
31 August 2004

I think its much nicer than the rendering.
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs318.jpg

redstone
September 1st, 2004, 04:05 PM
Wow, rising very fast.

RafflesCity
September 4th, 2004, 11:55 AM
4 Sep 2004

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs049.jpg

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/500/103gs049a.jpg

redstone
September 4th, 2004, 11:57 AM
Nice contrast!

Those pillars look so small.

RafflesCity
September 4th, 2004, 12:13 PM
Thanks :)

I believe the small pillars help make it more elegant, better than huge columns. Also once its complete I believe there will be more pedestrian space around it.

redstone
September 4th, 2004, 12:15 PM
They LOOK weak.

heirloom
September 4th, 2004, 01:52 PM
that's a huge gap! it would be so much nicer without pillars

RafflesCity
September 4th, 2004, 02:48 PM
yup, the thinner the pillars are would make it seem like the top part is suspended over the gap - something you wouldnt want with thick and clumsy pillars.

RafflesCity
September 7th, 2004, 03:11 PM
6 Sep 2004

The hole seems to look quite harmonious with the overall massing of the building
http://img22.exs.cx/img22/8012/gs069.jpg

Pengui
September 8th, 2004, 10:05 AM
I really don't like this one, for now.
The shape is boring, the cladding looks really ugly, and I don't like the gaps.

RafflesCity
September 8th, 2004, 02:41 PM
Looks like you totally hate it! ^^

As for me I agree, yes, its a boring box and they could have built something taller, but I'm glad for the holes that add some interest to its shape and I'm hoping the top will be well lit at night! :yes:

Pengui
September 9th, 2004, 05:45 AM
Yeah the location is really good just behind Boat Quay, I think they could have come with a better design to complement OCBC and Singtel towers. Hopefully they're doing a better job on the southern side of the CBD ^^ I'm looking forward to see those 245m sail-shaped apartment towers rising :-)

heirloom
September 9th, 2004, 08:29 AM
actually i like the cladding.. i don't mind if the shape is boring and the cladding is interesting and vice versa

RafflesCity
September 12th, 2004, 03:32 PM
11 Sep 2004

http://img83.exs.cx/img83/6845/gs119.jpg

redstone
September 13th, 2004, 09:17 AM
I must comment City Telecoms has very small windows.

RafflesCity
September 23rd, 2004, 02:26 PM
22 Sep 2004

http://img68.exs.cx/img68/4171/gs229.jpg

http://img63.exs.cx/img63/4743/gs229a.jpg

heirloom
September 23rd, 2004, 02:28 PM
i have decided i like it except the pillars. also it looks a little unproportionate in first pic.

RafflesCity
September 23rd, 2004, 02:44 PM
thats because of the base. There is also another angle which has another hole cut-out nearer to the top.

huaiwei
September 24th, 2004, 06:14 PM
Strange, because it is the pillars which make this building beautiful to me! :D

heirloom
September 24th, 2004, 06:45 PM
i dont like the cladding of the pillars..

huaiwei
September 24th, 2004, 07:08 PM
i dont like the cladding of the pillars..
Whats wrong with the cladding? Looks pretty normal to me?

heirloom
September 24th, 2004, 08:36 PM
looks plasticky. and too many. i'd rather have larger but fewer pillars - and clad in some type of stone. or something less plasticky.

huaiwei
September 24th, 2004, 08:48 PM
looks plasticky. and too many. i'd rather have larger but fewer pillars - and clad in some type of stone. or something less plasticky.
I dont think stone is going to go very well with a glassy facade like that. Solid blue with silvery white is a sure-win combination....as it has for High Street Centre, and it will on this one. Heck, maybe they were inspired by the police uniform colours! :D

heirloom
September 24th, 2004, 09:05 PM
well actually i can't really think of a stone that would go perfectly with this either. and i remember the same plasticky columns look quite fine with raffles city and paragon. however the main colours of these two shopping centres are off-whitish - not dark blue like this. i still dont like the combination.

RafflesCity
September 25th, 2004, 03:13 PM
The pillars look just nice and should be thin - to give emphasis to the voids in the building, something which make this unique!

redstone
September 25th, 2004, 03:16 PM
Makes it look unbalanced...

huaiwei
September 25th, 2004, 03:33 PM
Makes it look unbalanced...
Why so?

Whats wrong with that void? It looks so much more grand then the one in OMB!

redstone
September 25th, 2004, 03:36 PM
They look so alike.

huaiwei
September 25th, 2004, 03:40 PM
They look so alike.
Oh, but while one has a greenish tinted facade which I dont really like, this one looks so much better with a bluish tint!

It brightens up my day! :D

RafflesCity
October 3rd, 2004, 02:50 PM
2 October 2004

http://img51.exs.cx/img51/3599/gs210.jpg

huaiwei
October 3rd, 2004, 03:02 PM
How come it looks like a big shoe box in gift wrapper now?! :D

RafflesCity
October 3rd, 2004, 03:04 PM
:rofl:

I just love the cool blue.......

huaiwei
October 3rd, 2004, 03:09 PM
:D

Anyway...do I see what looks like a vehicular ramp somewhere further down the building?

RafflesCity
October 3rd, 2004, 03:10 PM
yup, there is a circular vehicular access to upper-storey carparking :yes:

huaiwei
October 3rd, 2004, 03:14 PM
yup, there is a circular vehicular access to upper-storey carparking :yes:
they have taken to above ground car parking?

My professor was saying below ground parking is rare in many places, because it is so expensive. I suppose this developer wants to save some $$$ then. :D

RafflesCity
October 3rd, 2004, 03:36 PM
NTUC Centre also has above ground parking.

Considering how fast this one rose (seems like yesterday Cliff said they were demolishing Pidemco Centre), I'm not surprised they really tried to keep costs low :cool:

huaiwei
October 3rd, 2004, 03:49 PM
Is it? I didnt realise that....I only can remember Hong Leong building having a very visible above ground packing space. ;)

How many floors of packing does this building have?

redstone
October 3rd, 2004, 04:42 PM
It's stopped growing...

RafflesCity
October 5th, 2004, 01:26 PM
How many floors of packing does this building have?

I'm not entirely sure..about 4 :yes:

heirloom
October 13th, 2004, 11:45 PM
Post: http://files.photojerk.com/sybarite/republicplaza/onegeorgestreet.jpg

RafflesCity
October 18th, 2004, 12:13 PM
Looks really fat in the pic. btw I wonder if theyre adding some crown feature to the top I saw some spiky stuff on the top recently but didnt take a pic.

heirloom
October 18th, 2004, 12:46 PM
a spiky crown on a rectangular buildign? that's weird..

RafflesCity
October 18th, 2004, 12:49 PM
if you saw the rendering you will see they have a spiky top that goes round the whole perimeter of the top floor..they might be building that, or unless those structures I saw were something else.

Will try to snap a pic asap.

huaiwei
October 18th, 2004, 01:06 PM
Spiky top??

Anyway it looks rather broad in that picture. Seems like large floor plates are all the rage nowadays?

RafflesCity
October 18th, 2004, 02:48 PM
yup bigger floor plates seem desirable..this building looks like its better suited for the new downtown rather than on that historical area.

RafflesCity
October 20th, 2004, 01:03 PM
20 Oct 2004

http://img99.exs.cx/img99/4659/gs2010.jpg

I wonder what those spikes/rods on the top are for
http://img27.exs.cx/img27/2315/gs2010a.jpg

heirloom
October 20th, 2004, 01:36 PM
almost complete:)

Taipei74
October 21st, 2004, 05:20 AM
20 Oct 2004
I wonder what those spikes/rods on the top are for
http://img27.exs.cx/img27/2315/gs2010a.jpg

Hello all. The steelwork up there is for the suncreen wall that will continue up past level 23. 3 elevations of sunscreen wall, while the 4th elevation will be a glass wall.

heirloom
October 21st, 2004, 09:07 AM
whats it for? you work for this development?

Taipei74
October 22nd, 2004, 10:35 AM
whats it for? you work for this development?

Nothing more then to make it look taller. I work for the curtainwall sub-contractor and was involved in the manufacture of the curtainwall panels.

RafflesCity
October 22nd, 2004, 11:18 AM
thanks for the info Taipei74 and welcome to Singapore forum! :)

yes it makes it look taller but I think it will help animate this boxy building.

Will the top light up at night?

huaiwei
October 22nd, 2004, 08:27 PM
Nothing more then to make it look taller. I work for the curtainwall sub-contractor and was involved in the manufacture of the curtainwall panels.
Cool to have a professional with us!! Welcome! :wave:

Do you by any chance know how tall the whole development will be including and excluding the curtainwalls?

Taipei74
October 23rd, 2004, 05:11 AM
Thanks for the welcome.

RafflesCity - Sorry but I don't know anything about the lighting arrangements for the building.

Huaiwei - The height from ground to top of sunscreen wall is 143.5M. The height from ground to the LMR (lift motor room) roof is 124.05M, while the height from ground to actual roof is 118.35M.

huaiwei
October 23rd, 2004, 09:46 AM
Thanks for the welcome.

RafflesCity - Sorry but I don't know anything about the lighting arrangements for the building.

Huaiwei - The height from ground to top of sunscreen wall is 143.5M. The height from ground to the LMR (lift motor room) roof is 124.05M, while the height from ground to actual roof is 118.35M.
WOOO!! Height figures!!! :eek:

Taipei, I would love to add those figures to skyscrapers.com/emporis.com. Would you mind me doing that? If so, would you mind telling me the source of your information (via PM if you wish), so that I can indicate it when I add the figures?

Jeez...this is unbelievable. Do you happen to have access to even more technial information like floor to ceiling heights, overall dimensions (such as width), gross floor area, and that kind of stuff? I will be most excited if you dont mind sharing it with us!

Thanks alot!! :grouphug:

RafflesCity
October 23rd, 2004, 04:45 PM
The crown will dramatically increase its height indeed, and form a nice and gradual drop with the Singtel Building next to it (mountain effect of Singapore skyline)

Looks exciting!
http://www.capitalandcommercial.com/onegeorge/images/mainbuilding.gif

23 Oct 2004

http://img89.exs.cx/img89/3248/gs2310.jpg

heirloom
October 23rd, 2004, 05:13 PM
looks nice with that gaping hole :D

huaiwei
October 23rd, 2004, 05:19 PM
And I tot you didnt like that hole before? :D

Taipei74
November 5th, 2004, 01:43 PM
WOOO!! Height figures!!! :eek:

Taipei, I would love to add those figures to skyscrapers.com/emporis.com. Would you mind me doing that? If so, would you mind telling me the source of your information (via PM if you wish), so that I can indicate it when I add the figures?

Jeez...this is unbelievable. Do you happen to have access to even more technial information like floor to ceiling heights, overall dimensions (such as width), gross floor area, and that kind of stuff? I will be most excited if you dont mind sharing it with us!

Thanks alot!! :grouphug:

The source of my info are the shop-drawings and elevations that I work from... :)

Ceiling to floor heights 3M

Floor area's range from 76M x 59M on the car park levels (base), 76M x 42M on the typical floor levels and 76M x 24M on the sky garden levels (where the void/hole is). I can't go through each floor by floor but those figure's will give you idea of the size of the tower.

heirloom
November 5th, 2004, 01:51 PM
i like the hole, but i dont like the many pillars. especiallly since they're round. i prefer them oblong.

redstone
November 5th, 2004, 03:07 PM
I wonder what the crown would look like?

Cliff
November 5th, 2004, 03:18 PM
Singapore's architecture is like its food, when its the bubble tea craze, everyone buys it, when its the pork floss craze, everyone eats it, when its the big hole in building craze, everybody builds it.:D(NTUC, 1GS)

redstone
November 5th, 2004, 03:21 PM
Yo, cliff!

Visit the o levels thread in Kopitiam! :D

RafflesCity
November 5th, 2004, 04:36 PM
Singapore's architecture is like its food, when its the bubble tea craze, everyone buys it, when its the pork floss craze, everyone eats it, when its the big hole in building craze, everybody builds it.:D(NTUC, 1GS)

but not too many fat boxes please....but yeah in the 70s many designs like DBS, CPF and UIC were fashionable. Now 'skygardens' and terraces seem common.

The crown structure is taking shape and will make a visible impact on the skyline. I hope they light it up at night :cool:

ignoramus
November 5th, 2004, 06:46 PM
but not too many fat boxes please....but yeah in the 70s many designs like DBS, CPF and UIC were fashionable. Now 'skygardens' and terraces seem common.

The crown structure is taking shape and will make a visible impact on the skyline. I hope they light it up at night :cool:

Dont forget the holes in the buildings in One North. Holes and skygardens are the norm there. They are merely extending this concept into the New Downtown.

RafflesCity
November 5th, 2004, 06:50 PM
thats true, also another concept is the linking of adjacent buildings by covered walkways and bridges. ALready we saw the model of the Sail being linked to 1 Raffles Quay.

RafflesCity
November 9th, 2004, 10:27 AM
8 November 2004

http://img124.exs.cx/img124/3200/gs0811.jpg

http://img128.exs.cx/img128/470/gs0811b.jpg

ignoramus
November 9th, 2004, 12:47 PM
Though its basically a box, you gotta admit that its top 10 on the list of world's best boxes. Why? Because when you look at it you are amazed by its size and it resembles
1. A maximum security prison complex of the year 2050.
2. A multinational tech corporation headquarters in the year 2050.
In short, its just so domineering in size and futuristic in feel.

redstone
November 9th, 2004, 01:01 PM
How exciting!

:banana: :banana2: :carrot: :pepper: :banana2: :cucumber:

:dance:


The crown looks like some high voltage electric fence! :D

ignoramus
November 9th, 2004, 01:24 PM
Who cares what it looks like so as long as it makes things less boxy. Sometimes I love extra stuff on skyscrapers (like Millennia Tower's roof) cause I don't like it when everything is built up to their maximum possible height for use. Makes everything seem so utilitarian.

huaiwei
November 9th, 2004, 01:42 PM
The source of my info are the shop-drawings and elevations that I work from... :)

Ceiling to floor heights 3M

Floor area's range from 76M x 59M on the car park levels (base), 76M x 42M on the typical floor levels and 76M x 24M on the sky garden levels (where the void/hole is). I can't go through each floor by floor but those figure's will give you idea of the size of the tower.
Thanks!

Is it possible for you to send me your particulars via PM?

heirloom
November 9th, 2004, 02:30 PM
actually it isnt the most 'pure' box.. its got holes and stuff and its more like two boxes. i could think of a number of boxes nicer than this... not sure if ti can be top ten or not... but quite nice lar.

RafflesCity
December 1st, 2004, 06:12 AM
30 November 2004

http://img78.exs.cx/img78/4539/gs3011b.jpg

http://img85.exs.cx/img85/8193/gs3011c.jpg

huaiwei
December 1st, 2004, 11:37 AM
Oh my! Look at THAT!! :eek:!!

hyacinthus
December 7th, 2004, 05:57 PM
Taken on 7 Dec 2004

http://img63.exs.cx/img63/6237/u9ldscn0024.jpg

redstone
December 8th, 2004, 01:41 AM
That's really something! :eek:

Pengui
January 4th, 2005, 09:44 AM
I still don't really like this one...

http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/tour/050104_one_george_street01.jpg
Looks like nothing from this side... Rather aukward.

http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/tour/050104_one_george_street02.jpg
Eek ! It looks like a huge beast going to eat Singtel tower (or fall on it).

http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/tour/050104_one_george_street03.jpg
This side looks much better imo... Quite good, actually, if you don't look too closely at the cladding.

huaiwei
January 4th, 2005, 10:11 AM
Hmm...is the roof going to stay that way??

redstone
January 4th, 2005, 12:23 PM
:eek: :cool:
Singapore's next landmark!

redstone
January 4th, 2005, 12:27 PM
http://membres.lycos.fr/pengui/tour/050104_one_george_street02.jpg
Eek ! It looks like a huge beast going to eat Singtel tower (or fall on it).

:lol:

huaiwei
January 4th, 2005, 12:46 PM
Aye yeah hor....didnt realise till now! :lol:

redstone
January 4th, 2005, 12:50 PM
The shophouses are running for their lives from the monster! :lol:

RafflesCity
January 4th, 2005, 12:58 PM
:eek: :cool:
Singapore's next landmark!

I wont exactly call it a landmark, but I hope its crown is lighted at night..i think the base is interesting though :cool:

redstone
January 4th, 2005, 12:59 PM
The pillars look weak nd the whole tower unbalanced...

RafflesCity
January 4th, 2005, 01:00 PM
It adds a lot to the skyline from the slim side..but I dont fancy the broad side..too dominating