omidhercule
January 14th, 2012, 10:30 PM
which proved to be more destructible. discuss but please stay on topic
|
View Full Version : which was more destructive, revolution or 8 year war? omidhercule January 14th, 2012, 10:30 PM which proved to be more destructible. discuss but please stay on topic SoroushPersepolisi January 14th, 2012, 11:05 PM they both are inter connected, without the revolution, no war would of happened, also, if it wasnt for iran's and iraq's stupid leaders, the war could of been 2 years long, but khomeinii decided to go and conquer karbala..., and neither side decided to compensate Aerithia January 15th, 2012, 10:58 AM The revolution. It ended over 2000 years of monarchy and ripped Iran to pieces (and it still has to recover). persian January 15th, 2012, 12:01 PM Revolution. irane-azad January 15th, 2012, 04:58 PM Absolutely the revolution. Besides, if there had been no revolution, there would have been no war. Saddam Hossein ghalat mikard bekhad be Iran hamle kone. Arteshe shah babasho to kxxnesh mikard :0) Ahura_Mazda January 16th, 2012, 06:02 PM Islamic Revolution for sure. shayan January 16th, 2012, 11:38 PM Revolution. freddie_is_persian January 17th, 2012, 07:56 AM ignorant people! Koobideh January 18th, 2012, 09:29 PM Revolution no doubt SoroushPersepolisi January 19th, 2012, 12:54 AM i really wont call it revolution, revolution means to re- evolve ours was "redestruction" the amount of destruction, physically and culturally (nemiduni, mardom bi farhang shodan badjur, rude, noisy, angry cheating and careless animals we have turned into) is just uncountable |