The full searchable (by state) database can be accessed at the bottom of article. Data is from the US census.
http://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/on-numbers/scott-thomas/2012/02/new-york-leads-nation-in-use-of-public.html

Texas metro, the full list of which is as follows:
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX -- 2.61%
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX -- 2.57%
College Station-Bryan, TX -- 2.44%
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX -- 2.24%
El Paso, TX -- 1.85%
Laredo, TX -- 1.83%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX -- 1.56%
Corpus Christi, TX -- 1.43%
Victoria, TX -- 1.08%
Lubbock, TX -- 0.97%

Hmm Dallas and Fort Worth probably shouldn't be combined since DART is only covering Dallas.

Hmm Dallas and Fort Worth probably shouldn't be combined since DART is only covering Dallas.

Well they are comparing the MSA as a whole so it would not make any sense to just cover city limits only.

Well they are comparing the MSA as a whole so it would not make any sense to just cover city limits only.
They should have did it by city limits. Heck, Arlington has no public transportation.

They should have did it by city limits. Heck, Arlington has no public transportation.

Wrong, they have the bus at UTA :banana: :lol:

Hmm Dallas and Fort Worth probably shouldn't be combined since DART is only covering Dallas.

Might as well combine. The T over here sucks!

DFWART Just doesn't sound as appealing, for obvious reasons. :)

DFWART Just doesn't sound as appealing, for obvious reasons. :)

How bout MARTS (Metroplex Area Rapid Transit System)

Wrong, they have the bus at UTA :banana: :lol:
That isn't public transportation.

How bout MARTS (Metroplex Area Rapid Transit System)

Better. If anything I think DART would keep it's name.

Better. If anything I think DART would keep it's name.

I think both would keep their names... only, they would opperate under one name.