Orfeo
June 29th, 2007, 10:27 AM
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1756/img1841vx8.jpg
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/2241/img1842ot8.jpg
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/2241/img1842ot8.jpg
|
View Full Version : #Completed: 400 George Street - 37st/150m/office Orfeo June 29th, 2007, 10:27 AM http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1756/img1841vx8.jpg http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/2241/img1842ot8.jpg CULWULLA July 1st, 2007, 09:04 AM thanks orfeo GMAC July 22nd, 2007, 02:49 AM Pics Today http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid225/p9d03006d3c4ec8b934439028250b2c61/e87ac010.jpg Blackcaldera July 25th, 2007, 11:17 AM http://lh4.google.com/eaton.rob/RqcTerL6_gI/AAAAAAAAARY/hgjA7V2i5xE/s800/_MG_4286.jpg Aussie Bhoy July 25th, 2007, 02:08 PM Great picture, must be taken from the magistrates courts. I've forgotten, what is going in next door? Brissy4me July 25th, 2007, 03:01 PM Awesome photo. It really shows the progress and layout of the site. Thanks. A r c h i July 25th, 2007, 03:18 PM Great picture, must be taken from the magistrates courts. I've forgotten, what is going in next door? Northbridge Tower, no? BrizzyChris July 25th, 2007, 03:23 PM ^^ Yep. Muse July 25th, 2007, 07:53 PM So 2 150m jobs, boxes going up side-by-side. This should be interesting. KJBrissy July 25th, 2007, 11:50 PM It's a race ;) abc July 26th, 2007, 12:55 AM BLUE tower crane base lying there... looks like the Mary street cranes might be heading there Brissy4me July 26th, 2007, 06:13 AM My bet is on Northbridge first. BrizzyChris July 26th, 2007, 06:59 AM Well, the Northbridge core base seems to be almost done, but 400 George has a much deeper basement. I have my money on 400 George. KJBrissy August 2nd, 2007, 12:10 PM The basement seems to be at full depth now...BTW my bet is on Northbridge. Brissy4me August 12th, 2007, 04:19 AM http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/10082007176.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/10082007177.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/10082007178.jpg BrizzyChris August 12th, 2007, 10:22 AM Why does Northbridge have no basement? CULWULLA August 21st, 2007, 01:14 AM is this a new render? no longer green http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/7374/400georgeeat3.jpg KJBrissy August 21st, 2007, 01:15 AM I love it!!!! It looks much better. Is that from the architects? CULWULLA August 21st, 2007, 01:28 AM its from latest Leightons letter> http://www.leightonproperties.com.au/web/pdf/march06.pdf KJBrissy August 21st, 2007, 01:32 AM March 06...Not sure which is the later version. dsfenasni August 21st, 2007, 02:07 AM crane is up KJBrissy August 21st, 2007, 02:09 AM So does that mean that both Northbridge and 400 George both have cranes up? BrisbaneROCKS August 21st, 2007, 03:01 AM Hmm I'm not a fan. I much rather the charming glass facade. I prefer the interesting podium design of this one though, lots of dramatic flair. I'm not convinced this is the final design, as the glass facade design had gone through several minor touch ups within the last 6-9 months, particularly with the core box feature on the roof. I think this may have been the original proposal. WestEnderBender August 21st, 2007, 03:12 AM Wow!! This new design just makes everything better. I always thought 400 George was slightly boring, and would look even worse beside Northbridge. This design would just complement Northbridge so well. And looks far more imposing from the street. I hope that this wasn't just an old render.... dsfenasni August 21st, 2007, 04:57 AM i'm on crack, there is only 1 crane there so it must've been northbridge. i was on a bus. KJBrissy August 21st, 2007, 07:36 AM Yeah it was on Northbridge...walked passed it today. Catherine August 21st, 2007, 08:18 AM This render seems more interesting than the other render, but I wouldn't be surprised if that means it's from an earlier scheme. Bland 80's buildings seem to be the flavour of the month. KJBrissy August 21st, 2007, 08:19 AM Agree totally. The initial render was more interesting with better differences. I also like the darker colour. nismo33 August 21st, 2007, 11:42 AM bit of a shame i kinda liked the other one more... notice there is signage on the east facing side in this render now northbridge will block the other. Maroon Grown August 21st, 2007, 02:19 PM i like this one a lot more. looks great. WestEnderBender August 21st, 2007, 02:54 PM They still have photos of the green one up on the construction site though, on Turbot Street. Perhaps the blue render is an old one? Fingers crossed it's a new one though! BrisbaneROCKS August 22nd, 2007, 02:06 AM Am I the only one half glad we're getting the blue/green glass facade? Up until now I haven't really heard anyone whinge about it, and rightly so. Classic, minimalist, and a nice podium. This older design would age in 2-3 years. Too much going on, and a few cheap 'Devine' style finishes there too. I do, though, like the idea of the bright green 'G400' neon or LED lights. And the podium is a bit more dramatic on this. Other than that, the newer design is more complete. Blackcaldera August 28th, 2007, 04:46 AM The Leighton render is really old. It is definately going to be green with some grey features. It won't be too far from the renders on the website www.400george.com Aussie Bhoy August 31st, 2007, 08:01 AM Fri 31 Aug http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/7526/p8220057zx2.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1676/p8220064jc1.jpg (http://imageshack.us) Blackcaldera September 3rd, 2007, 03:11 PM There should be a video here: http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-9086203584534476991&hl=en-AU Muse September 3rd, 2007, 03:39 PM :okay: Cool vid. Love the lobby and 1st floor amenities. Also its profile from street level. Bit silly calling the top levels of a 37-level building "sky-rise" though :| (takes a bit more than that). I guess it's just to discern for marketing purposes tho'. Thx. Brissy4me September 4th, 2007, 02:16 PM Excellent video! thanks for sharing!! :) BrisbaneROCKS September 6th, 2007, 07:13 AM Jesus this and NorthBridge are flying. I really can't wait to see how much of a transformation just these 2 buildings alone will bring to this area. Am I still alone in saying that the glass facade we've ended up with on 400 George is a bit more complete than that earlier drawing? KJBrissy September 20th, 2007, 09:14 AM First concrete pour is in. Maroon Grown September 21st, 2007, 12:29 PM ^^ yeah saw it yesterday. basically, the footings for the core have been poured. northbridge is already a level or two above ground chowie September 22nd, 2007, 07:44 AM talk about copy of the style of presentation from rem koolhaas's project duke September 22nd, 2007, 08:42 AM Crane has been erected today. BrisbaneROCKS September 24th, 2007, 05:28 AM Wasn't there already a crane on site? Or was that for Northbridge tower? Either way, these 2 are in a race with 275 George for completion. All 3 are going to rise quite quickly it seems. 3 decent buildings in the one area of the CBD that needs a freshening up. Positive progress indeed! Catherine September 25th, 2007, 02:08 AM talk about copy of the style of presentation from rem koolhaas's project If only the building was the same calibre as OMA's work... Ausilencer October 2nd, 2007, 01:37 PM Heard rumours that Suncorp may take up the space in this tower - although I wouldn't hold too much credibility to the source, it could be a possibility. Aussie Bhoy October 20th, 2007, 02:47 AM Fri 19 Oct 2007 http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/4494/pa050092el8.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/4215/pa050091li0.jpg (http://imageshack.us) MyFavco November 27th, 2007, 05:19 AM They should finish off the B3 pour by next week, it is half done. The core is only up to the underside of B2 - these guys are really slow! It is very funny to watch the NorthBridge podium tower over these guys, they will never catch up to it. (btw, the ground level at the entry is RL14.22 and the top of the plant enclosure is RL159 = 145m high) CULWULLA November 27th, 2007, 10:57 PM favco- apparently back in oct06 post#158 a floor was added to up the height to RL165m or 150m above grd. BrisbaneROCKS November 28th, 2007, 02:35 AM Going slowly but surely then. Once they've done the podium in theory it should shoot up. Will be quite a sight watching this and it's close neighbour rising up. This end of town desperately needs this. Oriolus December 8th, 2007, 01:49 PM There are some really cool construction pics on the official website (www.400george.com), and from MyFavco's discription, these seem to be pretty recent: http://i9.tinypic.com/89g1lxl.jpg http://i3.tinypic.com/6oc9jiu.jpg GMAC January 28th, 2008, 02:08 AM Taken Monday 27th January. http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b8df06b3127cceb4057982ea8b00000026102QbOXDVqzZa Fabian January 28th, 2008, 05:35 AM Feburary will be the month that this baby blasts off. :) Thanks for the update GMAC. I'm going to enjoy the contest between this one and Northbridge Tower to see who finishes first. :) Maroon Grown January 28th, 2008, 11:18 AM ^^my office has perfect view of these two. northbridge will flog it. its already 5 floors above ground, although it never had to dig a basement. KJBrissy January 28th, 2008, 01:00 PM Which Office are you in? I'm at 420 George and it's a great view of these two! KJBrissy February 1st, 2008, 07:48 AM Floorplates are at ground level now. davee08 February 3rd, 2008, 11:40 AM they've surely made some progress on the site whens the completion date expected for this? Brissy4me February 11th, 2008, 11:30 AM Are there any precommittments yet? Maroon Grown February 11th, 2008, 11:59 AM a brisbane based lawyer firm (cant remember who) and possibly MBF. Blackcaldera February 17th, 2008, 01:14 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6669-Copy.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6670-Copy.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6691-Copy.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6694-Copy.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6696a-Copy.jpg Blackcaldera February 20th, 2008, 05:27 AM Written on 10-02-2008 by Cooper Grace Ward Cooper Grace Ward has announced it will be expanding into a planned five star green building at 400 George Street, Brisbane in September 2009. Chris Ward, Managing Partner said that the move is driven by the need for more space to accommodate the continuing growth of the firm. With the firm seeing growth in team members by 15%, and revenue 18% for the year ended December 2007, Cooper Grace Ward is well positioned to continue to benefit from the dynamic Queensland market place, particularly in the commercial and property sectors. In the new premises, covering 4,300m2 over three floors, the firm will offer all team members a state of the art working environment compared to the current 2,900m2 occupied in Central Plaza 2. A major deciding factor in the new location was the “available facilities for team members, including a gym and child care centre in the building, close proximity to a range of public transport as well as an exclusive rooftop entertainment area which overlooks the CBD.” said Ward. The new A-Grade commercial building, situated in the Northern Quarter Precinct, will also provide easy access to green spaces, shopping, cultural and entertainment venues in both the CBD and South Bank via the proposed Tank St Foot Bridge. In addition, 400 George Street will be within the heart of the Supreme Court Precinct announced in June 2007. “It is no secret that over the past 18 months we have placed significant focus on our culture, our team and their development and the offerings of 400 George Street fit very comfortably within our focus,” said Ward. “The lead up to September 2009 when 400 George Street will be completed will be an exciting time for all team members at Cooper Grace Ward”. http://cgw.com.au/process/views/article.html?articleId=3536 JVogt February 20th, 2008, 02:45 PM I'm assuming they're a law firm or something similar - in which case, why put out a press release saying you're moving your office in a year and a half? Is this normal? Do companies often put out seemingly inconsequential press releases that poor newspaper journalist interns have to spend their day pouring over? Overly dramatic, but I'm sure you get my point :P Having said that, it's appropriate to post it in this thread, so my thanks to Blackcaldera. brisbanite February 21st, 2008, 01:09 AM ^^ Marketing JVogt. Look at us we are a growing firm. Blackcaldera February 21st, 2008, 10:16 AM 400 George Street achieves 5 Star Green Star rating Sat 16 Feb, 2008 News 400 George Street, one of the new generation of office towers in Brisbane's CBD, developed by Leighton Properties and Grosvenor, has been awarded the coveted 5 Star Green Star - Office Design rating from the Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA). 400 George Street is the only building currently being developed within the Brisbane CBD with a 5 Star Green Star rating. Leighton Properties Director Andrew Borger said the project team's holistic approach to sustainability showcased industry best practise with far reaching benefits for tenants. "This achievement recognises the significant scope of the project's sustainability initiatives ranging from water and energy savings to indoor environment quality, sustainable materials, transport and innovation," Mr Borger said. Graham Livingstone, Development Director, Grosvenor added, "400 George Street's design achieved 65 points - exceeding the required 60 points to gain 5 star accreditation. We are delighted with this 5 star outcome and, together with Leighton Properties, are proud of our team's outstanding commitment to sustainability which brought us in well over the required points." The Green Building Council of Australia's 5 Star Green Star - Office Design rating is awarded to projects that showcase Australian excellence in environmentally sustainable design. The outstanding points of difference are the innovations designed into 400 George Street. The 'green' design initiatives include a smart approach to construction that will save 40,000m2 in materials (similar to the building's commercial space) and a revolutionary air-conditioning system that will alone save 700,000 litres of water and 100,000kg of carbon dioxide every year through recycling. The building is also designed to achieve a 5 star Australian Building Greenhouse Rating (ABGR) and is predicted to reduce green house gas emissions by 2,604,000 kg of carbon dioxide annually. Research* into buildings and occupants' health, commissioned by Grosvenor and Leighton Properties, shows that sustainable building design can directly contribute to improvements in the bottom line of tenants' businesses. "The 5 star design of 400 George Street is expected to directly contribute to as much as a 15 percent boost in employees' productivity through its environmentally friendly work environment," Mr Livingstone said. "The building's unique design will offer employees 50 percent more fresh air than a typical office building as well as extensive views of the CBD and Roma Street Parklands," he said. 400 George Street encourages employees to ride to work through cycling facilities providing approximately one bike rack per ten employees and extensive change room facilities. The landmark, 34-storey (43,000 square metres) development benefits from its location within the CBD's North Quarter precinct providing easy access to public transport, restaurants and retail. The North Quarter precinct is injecting more than $4.1 billion of commercial property over the next five years into Brisbane's CBD. Construction (by Thiess) on 400 George Street is moving ahead strongly and is expected to be above ground by the end of February, leading a wave of regeneration for the North Quarter precinct. http://www.gbcaus.org/gbca.asp?sectionid=5&docid=1470 nismo33 February 21st, 2008, 12:37 PM [QUOTE=Blackcaldera;18475710] http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6691-Copy.jpgQUOTE] So what's going on in the site to the right of McD & East? BrizzyChris February 21st, 2008, 03:25 PM Entrance/plaza area for the Northbridge Tower. Fabian February 21st, 2008, 09:36 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6696a-Copy.jpg It will look like a towering giant from this angle when complete. JayT February 22nd, 2008, 04:16 AM 400 George Street achieves 5 Star Green Star rating Sat 16 Feb, 2008 News 400 George Street, one of the new generation of office towers in Brisbane's CBD, developed by Leighton Properties and Grosvenor, has been awarded the coveted 5 Star Green Star - Office Design rating from the Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA). 400 George Street is the only building currently being developed within the Brisbane CBD with a 5 Star Green Star rating. Leighton Properties Director Andrew Borger said the project team's holistic approach to sustainability showcased industry best practise with far reaching benefits for tenants. "This achievement recognises the significant scope of the project's sustainability initiatives ranging from water and energy savings to indoor environment quality, sustainable materials, transport and innovation," Mr Borger said. Graham Livingstone, Development Director, Grosvenor added, "400 George Street's design achieved 65 points - exceeding the required 60 points to gain 5 star accreditation. We are delighted with this 5 star outcome and, together with Leighton Properties, are proud of our team's outstanding commitment to sustainability which brought us in well over the required points." The Green Building Council of Australia's 5 Star Green Star - Office Design rating is awarded to projects that showcase Australian excellence in environmentally sustainable design. The outstanding points of difference are the innovations designed into 400 George Street. The 'green' design initiatives include a smart approach to construction that will save 40,000m2 in materials (similar to the building's commercial space) and a revolutionary air-conditioning system that will alone save 700,000 litres of water and 100,000kg of carbon dioxide every year through recycling. The building is also designed to achieve a 5 star Australian Building Greenhouse Rating (ABGR) and is predicted to reduce green house gas emissions by 2,604,000 kg of carbon dioxide annually. Research* into buildings and occupants' health, commissioned by Grosvenor and Leighton Properties, shows that sustainable building design can directly contribute to improvements in the bottom line of tenants' businesses. "The 5 star design of 400 George Street is expected to directly contribute to as much as a 15 percent boost in employees' productivity through its environmentally friendly work environment," Mr Livingstone said. "The building's unique design will offer employees 50 percent more fresh air than a typical office building as well as extensive views of the CBD and Roma Street Parklands," he said. 400 George Street encourages employees to ride to work through cycling facilities providing approximately one bike rack per ten employees and extensive change room facilities. The landmark, 34-storey (43,000 square metres) development benefits from its location within the CBD's North Quarter precinct providing easy access to public transport, restaurants and retail. The North Quarter precinct is injecting more than $4.1 billion of commercial property over the next five years into Brisbane's CBD. Construction (by Thiess) on 400 George Street is moving ahead strongly and is expected to be above ground by the end of February, leading a wave of regeneration for the North Quarter precinct. http://www.gbcaus.org/gbca.asp?sectionid=5&docid=1470 It seems Fortitude Valley/Newstead are beating Brisbane CBD in terms of Green Ratings. I mean Green Square has a 5 star rating and the new Energex HQ in Newstead will have a 6 star rating. J KJBrissy February 22nd, 2008, 04:26 AM One One One Eagle is expected to get 6 stars. i think this will be the tallest and biggest Office complex to achieve this. JayT February 22nd, 2008, 04:50 AM One One One Eagle is expected to get 6 stars. i think this will be the tallest and biggest Office complex to achieve this. Did you know, due to our subtropical climate its much harder to achieve a good green rating in Queensland than it is in say Victoria or Tasmania. J JVogt February 22nd, 2008, 02:38 PM Interesting JayT - why is that? Something to do with the greater differences between (required) internal and external temperatures? Blackcaldera February 22nd, 2008, 11:53 PM Very intresting. Sounds reasonable. It's suprising what impact the glazing has on these buildings and the way it affects the internal systems - This ultimately has an impact with green star. Glazing to these highrises have shading / reflectivity limits (I guess to stop people on the street or in cars being blinded by the being reflected back down). This then has an impact on the heat transmittance through the glass which in turn has an impact on the AC. This of course then has an impact on the size of plant & so on. I believe the facade panels at George Street are in the order of 3.7m high. So a small change in the glass type makes a big difference in the internal AC. Under green star you get extra credits for natural daylighting. The easiest part about green star is getting the design rating. The hardest part is actually achieving the green star as built rating. wowsim February 24th, 2008, 11:18 AM Did you know, due to our subtropical climate its much harder to achieve a good green rating in Queensland than it is in say Victoria or Tasmania. J Interesting. I would have thought the opposite was true, as SE QLD has a comparably smaller, milder, range of temperatures than further south. Not to mention the greater variation in daylight hours. I guess it is the humidity requiring AC instead of natural air ventilation? But then i would have thought that in Winter, buildings designed with sustainability in mind would require almost no power to regulate temperature, as natural air ventilation would be sufficient. tic February 26th, 2008, 01:00 AM ^^ yeah that's what i would have thought too. alchemy February 26th, 2008, 01:29 AM yup.. buildings are full of heat sources (people, computers, lights, etc).. so they don't need all that much heating in winter. by contrast, in summer it uses heaps of juice to keep the building air-conditioned. that's the biggest difference. MyFavco February 27th, 2008, 04:30 AM Traditionally, corporate Tenants shudder at the idea of having natural ventilation instead of AC. But they are now starting to come around. CH2 (6 Greenstar building) in Melb has 20% of its area is naturally ventilated instead of AC. It also has a night purge system which naturally sucks all the old warm air out each night so that the building is full of fresh air at the beginning of each day. Catherine February 27th, 2008, 01:35 PM Traditionally, corporate Tenants shudder at the idea of having natural ventilation instead of AC. But they are now starting to come around. CH2 (6 Greenstar building) in Melb has 20% of its area is naturally ventilated instead of AC. It also has a night purge system which naturally sucks all the old warm air out each night so that the building is full of fresh air at the beginning of each day. The majority of CH2s 20% naturally ventilated GFA is service area (bathrooms etc), so although this is one of the best Australian examples we have, we should also be considering international examples - the majority of the best examples available are European (Germany in particular, France also rates a mention), and although their climate is considerably different to the SEQ sub-tropical climate, there are still many lessons to be learnt. One important lesson that springs to mind is the German regulation that requires narrow floorplates in commercial settings - this is primarily to allow natural light for all inhabitants, but it also allows for effective cross-ventilation. Brisbane's primary enemy of 'natural ventilation' is humidity, particularly on still days, however the option to open a window has been absent for far too long - hopefully Vision (provided the operable windows haven't been cut from the budget) can provide some inspiration! Either that or some stronger industry regulation to put an end to all the mirrored glass air-conditioned boxes... Brizzy-Mike February 28th, 2008, 11:54 PM Yes. One of the greatest challenges to contemporary architectural styles is to have windows the open. Those buildings facing the river would be amazing if you could open them. The Stamford Plaza Hotel has so many rooms overlooking the river, it would be great to be able to open the windows there, but it is a bloody great fish bowl instead. so much for being in the state with weather beautiful one day and perfect the next. Maroon Grown March 1st, 2008, 02:13 PM ^^ office blocks arent really practical to open window. an obvious flaw is that wind will blow everything around. i could go on and on. hotels on the other hand, yes i agree, they should be openable. i hate stuffy hotel rooms. they are almost like jail cells. Catherine March 2nd, 2008, 03:04 AM ^^ office blocks arent really practical to open window. an obvious flaw is that wind will blow everything around. i could go on and on. hotels on the other hand, yes i agree, they should be openable. i hate stuffy hotel rooms. they are almost like jail cells. And this is why we can learn a lot from our European friends - double skin facades are a perfect example - the outermost layer protects from the weather (wind included), whilst the inner layer of glass can be operable. From memory, this is more or less what is being employed in Vision, and it's not an unworkable concept in commercial buildings either. It does however require a substantial initial investment and support from corporate tenants, both of which are lacking in the Australian market generally (with a few exceptions cropping up.) There are a few hurdles in adapating a system like this to our climate, but it is most definitely possible. There are also plenty of studies from around the world (including a few from Australia) that are showing that people who have more control over their own work environment (whether it be the ability to open the window or even just control their own A/C temperature etc) tend to be more happy and productive than those who have no control - and commercially speaking, increased productivity can amass to millions of dollars every year. KJBrissy March 2nd, 2008, 08:33 AM 2nd crane going up. Brizzy-Mike March 3rd, 2008, 11:39 PM If wind is blowing papers around in offices, can always get paper weights. Worked in an office in London where paper blew out the window once, quite amusing, but we were low down in the thing, higher up it is probably getting on for hurricane force? Aussie Bhoy March 5th, 2008, 08:44 AM Wed 5th March 2008 http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/2352/p2130085mt3.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/5662/p2130088qb1.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/8319/p2130089af3.jpg (http://imageshack.us) CULWULLA March 13th, 2008, 12:12 AM thanks for shots aussie. 2 cranes? KJBrissy March 13th, 2008, 12:14 AM ^^And 2 on Northbridge behind it aswell! KJBrissy March 20th, 2008, 04:58 AM The core box is now right up to the cabin of the middle crane. How will they raise they crane? mapps March 20th, 2008, 06:48 AM It is an internal climbing crane which means there is a climbing tower located at the bottom of the towers with climbing rams in it. These climbing rams sit and push off a beam climbing mechanism which sit in pockets in the left out in the concrete building core down at this level so you can basically raise the crane even though the core is up the bum of the crane. KJBrissy March 20th, 2008, 09:13 AM Cheers. I think I've only noticed the external ones. Aussie Bhoy March 24th, 2008, 04:58 AM Monday 24 March 2008 http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/4977/p3030032ky0.jpg (http://imageshack.us) Blackcaldera March 29th, 2008, 06:36 PM http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee27/robeaton/work%2028%20march/da72648c.jpg I can't wait to see this in a couple of months time when the entrance to the podium will be complete. The 15m high entrance column is going to make a pretty impressive statement! That's almost the same height as the Northbridge precast! Blackcaldera April 8th, 2008, 03:15 PM I think they started pouring Level 2 today http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee27/robeaton/8th%20april/Untitled_Panorama2.jpg BrizzyChris April 9th, 2008, 09:27 AM http://members.optusnet.com.au/chrismayhew59/IMG_5897small.jpg Aussie Bhoy April 10th, 2008, 03:22 AM That's a good 2 for 1 Danubis April 10th, 2008, 11:26 AM makes me wonder why they didnt just do a joint project and make use of a larger site... less duplication with lift shafts and what not. Blackcaldera April 10th, 2008, 12:35 PM I guess they sold the land for double what it was originally bought it for. n3pan3pa April 11th, 2008, 03:36 AM Does anyone know what major points they got for greenstar? Blackcaldera April 12th, 2008, 05:14 AM Does anyone know what major points they got for greenstar? What do you mean by 'major points' exactly? If you are asking how many they actually got - it would be over 60 to get the 5* rating Greenstar is split into several sections, which are then broken down into specific criteria credits. These define the requirements and the points. Management Credits address the adoption of sustainable development principles from project conception through design, construction, commissioning, tuning and operation. Indoor Environmental Quality Credits target environmental impact along with occupant wellbeing and performance by addressing the HVAC system, lighting, occupant comfort and pollutants. Energy Credits target reduction of greenhouse emissions from building operation by addressing energy demand reduction, use efficiency, and generation from alternative sources. Transport Credits reward the reduction of demand for individual cars by both discouraging car commuting and encouraging use of alternative transportation. Water Credits address reduction of potable water through efficient design of building services, water reuse and substitution with other water sources (specifically rainwater). Materials Credits targets resource consumption through material selection, reuse initiatives and efficient management practices. Land Use & Ecology Credits address a project's impact on its immediate ecosystem, by discouraging degradation and encouraging restoration of flora and fauna. Emissions Credits address point source pollution from buildings & building services to the atmosphere, watercourse, and local ecosystems. Innovation Green Star seeks to reward marketplace innovation that fosters the industry's transition to sustainable building. n3pan3pa April 14th, 2008, 12:45 AM I meant the three highest scores, so did they score 100% for transport, 80% for energy etc. Blackcaldera April 16th, 2008, 12:25 PM I'm not too sure. But I would guess management and transport would be extremely high (due to where the building is located). Similarly the land use & ecology will be very low, as it was a brown field site when they started. I wonder if Northbridge or 275 George Street are targeting anything? Blackcaldera April 16th, 2008, 12:30 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_1817.jpg n3pan3pa April 17th, 2008, 11:23 PM I'm not too sure. But I would guess management and transport would be extremely high (due to where the building is located). Similarly the land use & ecology will be very low, as it was a brown field site when they started. I wonder if Northbridge or 275 George Street are targeting anything? Dunno - depends who owns the building I guess and if they made a deal with whoever is tenanting. It seems to me it's become a bit of a shopping process with some buildings - pick the easiest and we'll go for it because we couldn't be arsed going fully green. Plus, I'm not too sure whether it's a good system. I mean, I agree that it's good because it gets people thinking about building green, but it's being heralded as fantastic and I'd really like to see more of an attitude of "yeah, it was a good start, but we can improve on this etc". I know of a building that was built in Qld and they were forced to put AC in it when they didn't need it just to get 6 star certification. Catherine April 18th, 2008, 04:51 AM Dunno - depends who owns the building I guess and if they made a deal with whoever is tenanting. It seems to me it's become a bit of a shopping process with some buildings - pick the easiest and we'll go for it because we couldn't be arsed going fully green. Plus, I'm not too sure whether it's a good system. I mean, I agree that it's good because it gets people thinking about building green, but it's being heralded as fantastic and I'd really like to see more of an attitude of "yeah, it was a good start, but we can improve on this etc". I know of a building that was built in Qld and they were forced to put AC in it when they didn't need it just to get 6 star certification. The Green Star Rating Scheme is a business - it doesn't have any form of government approval or sanction, and as a result it runs the risk of becoming little more than a marketing ploy for developers who simply want to achieve an advertising-friendly rating with the smallest amount of effort and cost (which is definitely possible under the current scheme.) It scheme itself is most definitely a good starting point to get both the industry and the public alike thinking about the environmental impact of buildings, but it shouldn't be considered the be all and end all. There are numerous rating schemes internationally that are for more sophisticated and holistic, but our industry has a long way to go before it starts getting serious about the long term impacts of the built environment. Blackcaldera April 21st, 2008, 08:49 AM Just came across this: http://www.yuanda.com.cn/Yuanda/Projects/Business/20070626403.asp These guys did some work on the Olympic Birds Nest which is in the news today. Looks like they are supplying the facade to 400 George Street. n3pan3pa April 23rd, 2008, 12:19 PM The Green Star Rating Scheme is a business - it doesn't have any form of government approval or sanction, and as a result it runs the risk of becoming little more than a marketing ploy for developers who simply want to achieve an advertising-friendly rating with the smallest amount of effort and cost (which is definitely possible under the current scheme.) It scheme itself is most definitely a good starting point to get both the industry and the public alike thinking about the environmental impact of buildings, but it shouldn't be considered the be all and end all. There are numerous rating schemes internationally that are for more sophisticated and holistic, but our industry has a long way to go before it starts getting serious about the long term impacts of the built environment. Damn straight - particularly when it's easier to put in more bicycle spaces than look at your design from the outset. It's a joke to ESD and it's a joke the way companies are using the term "sustainability" more and more. And yet the greater public are always going to buy it, from products labeled 'organic' to buildings rated as 'healthy' or 'green'. I know that the LEED system in America has had some major critics from the Rocky Mountain Institute who pioneered a lot of study in the early days of ESD. It can cost up to $50K over for a US project to be certified and I believe it's the same here. This may be a big generalisation, but consultants are charging shitloads to tell developers & the likes what the next big thing is. Now it's green buildings. What's it going to be in 5 years time? Any bet it will be something like smart buildings, where you can integrate technology and esd and everybody wins *vomit* Redress April 24th, 2008, 11:33 AM gay gay gay KJBrissy April 28th, 2008, 11:15 AM From Albert Street 27/04/08: http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h11/KJBrissy/27042008004.jpg Blackcaldera May 1st, 2008, 11:20 AM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/April%2008/Untitled_Panorama2.jpg KJBrissy May 3rd, 2008, 07:59 AM http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h11/KJBrissy/03052008083.jpg Orfeo May 4th, 2008, 08:11 AM http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/5419/dsc01369gz2.jpg http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/153/dsc01376zm7.jpg http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9612/dsc01388qv0.jpg Brissy4me May 4th, 2008, 10:45 AM The last photo is fantastic!! Aussie Bhoy May 4th, 2008, 12:26 PM Sun 4 May 2008 http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/5118/p3210028pi7.jpg (http://imageshack.us) beastjim May 4th, 2008, 01:00 PM ^^ The busway was a great place to get a photo of those two rising next to each other. Will give you something to look at just before you head down into King George Square Busway Station. Well for those using routes that go past that area anyways. CULWULLA May 4th, 2008, 11:51 PM these really will densify this area . now they will start to impact skyline. cheers alchemy May 21st, 2008, 02:58 AM has the colour of the glass changed??? http://www.400george.com.au/ Macca-GC May 22nd, 2008, 06:32 AM Taken on Tuesday http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/3622/dscn1344ve1.jpg Danubis May 22nd, 2008, 11:27 AM how long has that concrete building been there (next to the brisbane duty free) lol, ive never noticed it ever!?!! Brissy4me May 24th, 2008, 06:13 AM http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/22052008002.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/22052008004.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/22052008005.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h318/cj_81_/22052008007.jpg Blackcaldera June 17th, 2008, 03:21 PM Floors poured to Level Six, Core Level Nine. http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/june%2008/IMG_2522.jpg Urbania June 18th, 2008, 08:07 AM This tower looks massive! Blackcaldera July 5th, 2008, 05:44 AM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/_MG_9828x.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/_MG_9830x.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/_MG_9838x.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/_MG_9851x.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/_MG_9857x.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/_MG_9858x.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/5th%20July%2008/IMG_2804.jpg cranerider July 5th, 2008, 02:58 PM ^^^^ Nice roadster... Aussie Bhoy July 10th, 2008, 08:46 AM Today http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/3171/p5100050sd0.jpg (http://imageshack.us) Blackcaldera July 10th, 2008, 11:39 AM as of 10am this morning http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_2870.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_2873.jpg Northbridge will be gutted that these were installed first! :ohno: KJBrissy July 11th, 2008, 12:12 AM ^^Northbridge are way ahead of them with glazing! Blackcaldera July 11th, 2008, 11:39 AM ^^Northbridge are way ahead of them with glazing! Good one, but 400 GS still started first! :lol: Maroon Grown July 11th, 2008, 02:41 PM haha. they are hardly anything to gloat about considering northbridge has a full elevation of glazing and 400 george has a few panels slapped on the side. blackcaldera? is there a friendly rivalry between the two sites? is there any cooperation or sharded works between to two? are the same contractors working on certain aspects of construction for efficiency of labour? just curious KJBrissy July 15th, 2008, 02:04 AM Looks like something big has happened. They have blocked off the street and there are cops fire brigade and ambulances everywhere and the site has been evacuated. KJBrissy July 15th, 2008, 03:55 AM Update - It was a gas leak. JayT July 15th, 2008, 04:19 AM http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/Maroon1/400george.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/Maroon1/400george2.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/Maroon1/400george3.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v232/Maroon1/400george4.jpg Still got a long way to go. J neilo63 July 15th, 2008, 04:20 AM LOVE the void!! Blackcaldera July 15th, 2008, 09:09 AM Update - It was a gas leak. http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/city-gas-leak-forces-evacuations/2008/07/15/1215887588775.html A gas leak inside an Asian restaurant has been blamed for the evacuation of several CBD workplaces earlier today. Workers were evacuated from the McDonnell and East Building on George Street, after police received reports of a strong smell of gas coming from a neighbouring construction site. Construction workers were also evacuated from sites on the corner of Tank Street and North Quay around 10.45am. George Street between Tank and Turbot streets was closed to all vehicle and pedestrian traffic, as emergency crews tried to find the source of smell. The gas leak was eventually traced to an Asian restaurant on the ground floor of the McDonnell and East Building. An Emergency Services spokeswoman said gas had been leaking from an appliance in the restaurant overnight, and had spread throughout the building once airconditioning vents were turned on this morning. ``The appliance was turned off and workers were allowed back inside,'' the spokeswoman said. :lol: Workers were allowed to return to their buildings just before 11.30am. George Street has now been reopened to traffic. Blackcaldera July 21st, 2008, 12:55 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_3180.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_3175.jpg Los Cazadores July 22nd, 2008, 07:32 AM Word on the street is the shipment from China with the facade for both 400 George and Northbridge has been delayed by a few weeks. Has anyone else heard about this? Could it be the olympics? Blackcaldera July 22nd, 2008, 01:03 PM As the Olympics have been known about for the past four years I would have thought that was pure conjecture. If you look at their website they produce up to 12 Million Square meters of curtain wall a year. So you would hope they could plan around a two week sports event!? :uh: http://www.yuanda.com.cn/Yuanda/Company/Default.asp Macca-GC July 23rd, 2008, 06:04 AM ^^just to clarify, they were awarded the olympics seven years ago. Los Cazadores July 23rd, 2008, 09:09 AM Well, people know about long weekends but they still get caught in traffic.:banana: Los Cazadores July 25th, 2008, 01:13 AM Good one, but 400 GS still started first! is there something wrong with 400 george? they seem to be taking forever to get any glass panels up - i had a look this morning and they dont seem to have any up whilst northbridge are powering ahead with glass. anyone know exactly what is going on? beastjim July 25th, 2008, 03:39 AM 400 George Street is just about slow full stop. Northbridge has really powered upwards in its levels and now 400 george is only about half its height, I guess its a bigger floorplate ect but it just doesn't really seemed to have ramped up in construction. Maybe you have to build slowly to get the star levels or something. KJBrissy July 25th, 2008, 05:42 AM ^^I'm pretty sure 400 George has always been about half the height when they both got going upwards. beastjim July 25th, 2008, 05:59 AM Well 400George was always a couple of stories behind but now that number would be closer to double figures. Also if it has always been half the height then that just proves they are going slower! IE when NB was 5, 400G was 2-3 When NB was 10, 400G was 5 When NB was 20, 400G was 10 See going slower, if at maybe a constantly slower rate.:tongue3: KJBrissy July 25th, 2008, 06:04 AM ^^That's true...my bad! They've also been affected by gas leaks and I think they have a harder to access site. Just guesses though. Macca-GC July 25th, 2008, 08:16 AM Pic from today: From Roma Street http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/9642/dscn1459ux1.jpg KJBrissy July 25th, 2008, 08:26 AM ^^Just to clarify, all except for the 1st pic is Northbridge. Thanks for the pics though. Macca-GC July 25th, 2008, 08:50 AM Well it has Northbridge in it too. Everyone knows Northbridge and 400 George are right next to each other don't they. KJBrissy July 25th, 2008, 09:24 AM Why did you put pics of Northbridge in this thread rather than it's own? Macca-GC July 25th, 2008, 02:34 PM Oops sorry, my bad. Stupid me. Sorry, i meant to put them in the northbridge one. I will move them across KJBrissy July 26th, 2008, 02:41 PM Cheers. I thought I was getting them mixed up for a sec! Blackcaldera July 28th, 2008, 12:59 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_3482.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_3487.jpg Orfeo July 28th, 2008, 01:42 PM ^ Thanks for the pics - glass looks great :) Macca-GC August 1st, 2008, 08:23 AM from yesterday: you can see the glazing of both 400 george and northbridge in this one: http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/8995/dscn1526mr3.jpg http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7097/dscn1513ru2.jpg http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/8963/dscn1514ew7.jpg TOCC August 1st, 2008, 08:39 PM the northbridge facade looks pretty shitty r32_gts August 2nd, 2008, 11:51 AM the northbridge facade looks pretty shitty hahahaha my thoughts exactly. who picked the random pastel warm colours?? i hope that person realise their professional contribution to the world has had a net negative effect on society :tongue3: KJBrissy August 3rd, 2008, 01:12 AM But the renders has always shown these colours??? TOCC August 3rd, 2008, 08:47 AM yeah and it looks worse in reality, maybe when the whole building is done it will look nicer Wezza August 3rd, 2008, 02:38 PM Yeah, those colours look shit. Hope you right though TOCC, i'll reserve my final judgment upon completion. Los Cazadores August 4th, 2008, 12:42 AM I'll judge now - i guess northbridge will look alright, if you think a giant green homosexual frog coloured building is alright. It doesn't beat 400 George, which is only a little bit better Blackcaldera August 4th, 2008, 08:51 AM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_3626.jpg TOCC August 4th, 2008, 09:05 AM maybe someone should check if the building will be a giant advertisment for crayola pastels MyFavco August 4th, 2008, 09:27 AM giant green homosexual frog coloured building That is the best one I have read all year ! Not that there is anything wrong or especially colourful about being gay. brizboy August 5th, 2008, 01:08 AM That is the best one I have read all year ! Why does it have to be homosexual to be colourfull.. Or is that ment to be an insult to us Gay SSC members? :bash::ohno: KJBrissy August 5th, 2008, 02:13 AM Isn't it only really colourful on the wall facing 400 George? brizboy August 5th, 2008, 03:54 AM Isn't it only really colourful on the wall facing 400 George? Thats correct :) KJBrissy August 5th, 2008, 04:13 AM In that case I have no issues at all. The most visible areas will have plain glass and the tucked in areas will have colourful glass. Variety is an ok thing with towers such as this. Orfeo August 5th, 2008, 06:53 AM ^ the side facing the river will have the pastel panels as well. http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/333/northqv8.jpg BrizzyChris August 5th, 2008, 07:17 AM 5th August, 2008: http://members.optusnet.com.au/chrismayhew59/400george_august08.1 gerryt1 August 5th, 2008, 03:25 PM From earlier renders and postings I thought the north and south facades were to be a yellow/gold and the east and west facades were to be a blue. When did this all change? I also notice that there are kind of things sticking out in certain areas which seem to be in readiness for an extra strip of glazing or similar. Anyone help me out? gerryt1 August 5th, 2008, 03:36 PM ^^ That's Northbridge I'm talking about. Blackcaldera August 6th, 2008, 04:43 AM I also notice that there are kind of things sticking out in certain areas which seem to be in readiness for an extra strip of glazing or similar. The rectangular pieces are for the sunshades as shown on the render just posted by Orfeo. If you are referring to the cyclindrical things every couple of panels, then they are for the BMU (Building Maintenance Unit) gerryt1 August 7th, 2008, 06:06 AM (The rectangular pieces are for the sunshades as shown on the render just posted by Orfeo. If you are referring to the cyclindrical things every couple of panels, then they are for the BMU (Building Maintenance Unit) Thanks for the response but I can't open orfeos(413)posting. I'm computer dumb and if the little x is the link, then it isn't always there and when I do click on it nothing happens. Also,I'm still wondering when the colours were changed from blue on two sides and gold on two sides. I havn't read anything on these threads regarding that nor anything in the papers. Anyone know? I'm just curious,I guess. Macca-GC August 8th, 2008, 08:24 AM taken today http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/1835/dscn1529cd3.jpg Blackcaldera August 10th, 2008, 01:05 PM ( and if the little x is the link, then it isn't always there and when I do click on it nothing happens. Also,I'm still wondering when the colours were changed from blue on two sides and gold on two sides. Not sure what is happening there as the 'little x' should be where the image is. try right clicking on it and then 'show picture'. Hopefully all will be revealed along with the colours. Have a look through the Northbridge thread it it might all make a touch more sense Blackcaldera August 10th, 2008, 01:38 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10th%20August%2008/IMG_3830.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10th%20August%2008/IMG_3833.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10th%20August%2008/IMG_3835.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10th%20August%2008/IMG_3832.jpg BrizzyChris August 10th, 2008, 03:22 PM Nice updates Blackcaldera! Cheers. Gaz4007 August 10th, 2008, 03:24 PM Thanks for the pictures today - they're all really good and the weather is beautiful. Leesome August 10th, 2008, 06:19 PM wow. really liking the cladding a LOT! brizboy August 11th, 2008, 01:27 AM These new buildings are already having a massive impact on this side of the Skyline... Yummy Blackcaldera August 11th, 2008, 11:23 AM wow. really liking the cladding a LOT! Yep me too! If you compare it to the prestons each unit must be nearly 4m high. That is massive. Fabian August 11th, 2008, 01:57 PM Very imposing on the skyline !!! I love the aqua colour cladding - fits in with Brisbane and the Sunshine State. Blackcaldera August 18th, 2008, 11:41 AM The CSA leased part of the building. http://www.csa.gov.au/agency/pdf/contracts_calendaryear07.pdf Blackcaldera August 21st, 2008, 12:27 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/21st%20August/IMG_3969.jpg Ausilencer August 22nd, 2008, 01:56 PM I know I'm speaking too soon - but I think 400 George is going to look stunning when it's completed. BrizzyChris August 23rd, 2008, 06:13 AM ^^ I'm getting that same vibe. beastjim August 23rd, 2008, 02:29 PM Here they are climbing up next to each on Friday 22/08/08: http://www.panoramio.com/photos/original/13404229.jpg Blackcaldera August 30th, 2008, 06:21 AM Looks like they have started to overtake Northbridge on the install of the glass. http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/30th%20August/IMG_9934.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/30th%20August/IMG_9924copy.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/30th%20August/_MG_9908copy.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/30th%20August/_MG_9937-Copy.jpg TOCC August 30th, 2008, 07:47 AM great work Blackcaldera, there were plenty of views of the area of the city i havent seen before brizboy September 1st, 2008, 02:12 AM great work Blackcaldera, there were plenty of views of the area of the city i havent seen before Amen! Where did you take these shots Blackcaldera? exocet September 1st, 2008, 02:36 AM http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/8908/img0019se8.th.jpg (http://img244.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0019se8.jpg) Blackcaldera September 1st, 2008, 11:01 AM Amen! Where did you take these shots Blackcaldera? Cairns Terrace, Paddington & Albert Street just below Wickham Park. I came across Cairns Terrace by accident - It was such a good view I had to go back later with my camera to take the photos. Blackcaldera September 17th, 2008, 12:02 PM I meant the three highest scores, so did they score 100% for transport, 80% for energy etc. Found a document here that might answer your question http://www.scribd.com/doc/6068709/400-George-Street-Brisbane-5-Star-Green-Star beastjim September 30th, 2008, 09:39 AM The latest for 400 George St: http://static4.bareka.com/photos/medium/14554799.jpg http://www.panoramio.com/photo/14554799 I count 18 stories done on the floor stabs, core 20-21 stories. dubaidubai04 September 30th, 2008, 01:25 PM Cladding looking swell:) Blackcaldera October 1st, 2008, 12:35 PM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/october%2008/IMG_4472.jpghttp://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/october%2008/IMG_4473.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/october%2008/IMG_4476.jpghttp://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/october%2008/IMG_4477-1.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/october%2008/IMG_4480.jpghttp://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/october%2008/IMG_4477.jpg CULWULLA October 1st, 2008, 02:03 PM thanks for updates Macca-GC October 2nd, 2008, 02:28 AM I so prefer this one to Northbridge. Very sexy glass Aussie Bhoy October 24th, 2008, 06:44 AM Yesterday http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/6001/p8190042fp9.jpg (http://imageshack.us) exocet October 24th, 2008, 07:46 AM I so prefer this one to Northbridge. Very sexy glass Generic green-glassed box to me. I like Northbridge because its different and stands out. brizboy October 25th, 2008, 02:30 AM Just before you come into Fortitude Valley station on the train there is a building the right that has just been completed with the SAME glass!!!!! Check it out BrizzyChris October 25th, 2008, 04:54 AM Green Square North Tower? beastjim November 2nd, 2008, 02:57 PM From today, 2nd November. Would appear they are past the mid level void, and from now on it should be straight up with similar floor plates. From the pathway next to the Magistrates Construction site: http://www.mynetimages.com/c8732348.jpg CULWULLA November 3rd, 2008, 01:11 AM great shots. another great glass office tower MyFavco November 4th, 2008, 06:17 AM They poured Lvl 20 last week. They should pour Lvl 21 later this week. I have checked the revised plans which were approved by BCC 04/02/08. It shows the top screening extending to a height of RL 164.36. This makes the building 150.1m tall. There are only 35 storeys of office (incl. Ground). There is one plant floor above this (with lift access) and the LMR on the next level up. Do we count this as a 35 storey or 37 storey building? (as the current title suggests) CULWULLA November 5th, 2008, 11:51 PM we count all actual levels in skyscrapers. as an emporis editor, ive been told to include grd, mezzenine levels, and plant. 400 george has as follows grd floor, lev1,lev2,lev3, lev3A,levs 4-13 (10 floors), (plant levels 14 & 14A), lev15-32 (18 floors),lev33 plant,lev34cooling,lev34A-LMR. =37 actual levels. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3060/3005844369_1b79d70692_o.jpg Aussie Bhoy November 16th, 2008, 05:47 AM Sunday 16th Nov 2008 http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/38/p9120027uo6.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9452/p9120040nw7.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5084/p9120049nc1.jpg (http://imageshack.us) Blackcaldera November 24th, 2008, 01:29 PM You can now see scaffolding on the plant room and steel in the entrance. They have also started to infill the glass on George Street. http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6405.jpg CULWULLA November 24th, 2008, 01:40 PM these two towers are FAB. really impressive. Fabian November 26th, 2008, 02:03 AM From the past few days http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v28/Fabian/Brisbane/DSCF6563.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v28/Fabian/Brisbane/DSCF6570.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v28/Fabian/Brisbane/DSCF6557.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v28/Fabian/Brisbane/DSCF7205.jpg JVogt November 26th, 2008, 10:00 AM Thanks for all your posts Fabian! BrizzyChris November 27th, 2008, 10:41 AM Curtain wall hasn't moved in over a month. Must likely cause is because the concrete slab pouring has been very slow, and the facade guys probably have to wait till it climbs higher. Blackcaldera November 27th, 2008, 01:07 PM not that a week of wet weather and strong winds has anything to do with it!? :) something to do with 30amp power and rain not mixing too well beastjim November 30th, 2008, 04:24 PM I will agree with Chris in that the Facade really hasn't moved upwards much in a month, although they have infilled where the preston bins were. However the rain as Blackcaldera says certainly wouldn't have helped the situation 30th November http://www.mynetimages.com/64548e0a.jpg And more side on http://www.mynetimages.com/5df99304.jpg Blackcaldera December 3rd, 2008, 11:10 AM Looks like they have started installing again around the back of the building. If you look closely I think they have finished some of the plant room too http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6655.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6653.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_6652.jpg Blackcaldera December 3rd, 2008, 11:18 AM forgot to add that they now have a webcam... http://www.400george.com.au/webcam/?v=1 Blackcaldera December 10th, 2008, 08:15 AM As they start to drop the scaffold you can see the plantroom louvres & columns in these photos. Looks good and will give some interesting contrast to the main walls. http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10%20dec%2008/IMG_6921.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10%20dec%2008/IMG_6917.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10%20dec%2008/IMG_6918.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10%20dec%2008/IMG_6923.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/10%20dec%2008/IMG_6924.jpg Fabian December 10th, 2008, 09:50 AM Last Wednesday from Brisbane Town Hall http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/5932/dscf8597ws4.jpg http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/2840/dscf8617sg9.jpg Blackcaldera December 15th, 2008, 12:36 PM Started to build the Awning http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/151208/2008-12-15_09-40-51400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/151208/2008-12-15_09-42-46400georgestreet.jpg Mr MacPhisto December 23rd, 2008, 08:22 AM The EPA are moving out of 160 Ann St and 288 Edward to take floors 3 through 13 in this tower. That's the top of the podium through to that inset which is I guess marks the end of the mid-rise section and start of the high-rise section. They expect to be in by December 09. KJBrissy December 23rd, 2008, 08:36 AM I like it when companies/departments consolidate offices. Wish it would happen more often. It was really hard when space was tight! Blackcaldera January 22nd, 2009, 11:29 AM http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-08-08400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-08-10400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-10-36400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-13-27400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-15-57400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-26-25400georgestreet.jpg http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/jan%2009/2009-01-20_15-26-31400georgestreet.jpg MyFavco January 22nd, 2009, 11:44 AM It's a big blue sexy box. Marty_ January 23rd, 2009, 12:38 PM Another one turning out better than I expected. What a pleasant surprise :) Redress January 23rd, 2009, 11:37 PM Does anyone know of any news re the laneway proposed between the two buildings in picture? Sorry if dumb question or posted elsewhere... Blackcaldera January 24th, 2009, 01:51 AM The laneway exists and runs through the underside of Northbridge. The concrete to the entrance was formed back in December, on Turbot Street. You will probably not gain propper access to it from Turbot Street until 400 George is finished later in the year. Blackcaldera January 28th, 2009, 11:31 AM Redress, I posted a couple of photos of the 'tunnel' entrance under the Northbridge thread.. http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii194/Blackcaldera/IMG_8422.jpg TOCC January 28th, 2009, 12:37 PM hot Aussie Bhoy January 28th, 2009, 06:39 PM Looks good, nice view of the new hole for the courts building too exocet January 29th, 2009, 12:34 AM http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/5378/img0250qg9.jpg (http://imageshack.us) Aussie Bhoy January 29th, 2009, 03:28 PM Today http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/9809/pb170020qm4.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/9159/pb170021rp5.jpg (http://imageshack.us) http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2410/pb170023ba2.jpg (http://imageshack.us) Fabian January 30th, 2009, 11:40 PM Very noticeable from uni. Took it Thursday afternoon. http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/6540/dscf9451or0.jpg Brissy4me January 31st, 2009, 12:59 AM ^^ Which uni?? Orfeo January 31st, 2009, 05:14 AM ^ Fabian is at the Australian Catholic University, would have been the banyo campus. beastjim January 31st, 2009, 03:30 PM 31st January 2009 Everyone else is posting photos of this, so why not me:lol:. It certainly is rising now, and looks great. I sorta wish this had some prime water front real estate instead of hidden behind Northbridge, although that doesn't mean I would want Northbridge moved as well. http://www.mynetimages.com/c4ec12d4.jpg http://www.mynetimages.com/34193017.jpg Marty_ February 1st, 2009, 04:53 AM I wish it was immediately diagonal to Northbridge (corners touching). It would ad depth, make them slightly less boxish, and show off both buildings from the river. A r c h i February 1st, 2009, 09:38 AM I think both towers are looking superb but I wish the heights were staggered with 400G say an extra 30m or so taller. CULWULLA February 2nd, 2009, 11:48 AM yes they look great but next to each other?? so close? not even a gap. its like one building. Orfeo February 2nd, 2009, 12:00 PM I think both towers are looking superb but I wish the heights were staggered with 400G say an extra 30m or so taller. totally agree. Blackcaldera February 2nd, 2009, 12:03 PM I think both towers are looking superb but I wish the heights were staggered with 400G say an extra 30m or so taller. How about 2m taller!? :lol: MyFavco February 4th, 2009, 01:45 AM These guys just reached level 31 (RL138). Last year they where talking about a Sep-09 completion date. I think they will easily beat this. BTW, I don't agree that it is 37 stories. I have already gone in to detail about this issue earlier in this thread. Can anyone post clear plans which resolve the issue without doubt? Fyturis February 4th, 2009, 04:17 AM i walked past 400 geroge the other day and i have to say its facade (so far) and glazing both look really nice looks better in real life as opposed to the renders if you know what i mean. KJBrissy February 4th, 2009, 07:08 AM These guys just reached level 31 (RL138). Last year they where talking about a Sep-09 completion date. I think they will easily beat this. BTW, I don't agree that it is 37 stories. I have already gone in to detail about this issue earlier in this thread. Can anyone post clear plans which resolve the issue without doubt? It looks like 150m and 34 levels to me on the approved plans. Sky_Is_The_Limit February 4th, 2009, 08:25 AM In regards to the debate over how many floors this building is, the website says it is 33. When is this building expected to be completed? KJBrissy February 4th, 2009, 08:39 AM ^^ + ground level. Blackcaldera February 4th, 2009, 11:39 AM The latest planning application shows a terrace at level 33 (148.510mRL) There are four basements and obviously the ground floor(13.600 to 14.450mRL) There is reference somewhere (need to find it) to the roof being at 168m'ish, which means there is probably another two or three floors above the Level 33. as for what you count or don't .... I'll leave that up to you guys! :) http://www.scribd.com/doc/11635636/Landscape-planning-application-400-George CULWULLA February 5th, 2009, 02:39 AM CTBUH count actual levels above grd. MAny applications only state number of office levels ect. they disregard plant/grd ect. note-ground level isnt counted, theres are 2 level 3s, 2x lev14s, section showing levels ground level=1 office levels=28 podium levels=4 plant/mid=2 plant/top=2 total=37 roof=Rl165m http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3442/3253877247_7b5a6156a1_o.jpg Locke February 5th, 2009, 04:18 PM My concern with this tower is that the blinds will once again spoil the effect of the facade. It remains to be seen. It's quite a nice box otherwise, shame it's stuck behind Northbridge. Gotta spread the wealth when it comes to the skyline! Blackcaldera February 6th, 2009, 10:27 AM The view 'North' over the city is far more interesting than that of the river! Out of the two towers I reckon that 400 George has a better view! Red Nut February 11th, 2009, 12:08 PM It was a hive of activity today http://i44.tinypic.com/14y3gnb.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/28lxsbd.jpg Orfeo February 11th, 2009, 12:33 PM 2 more floor pours + roof structure to go? CULWULLA February 11th, 2009, 10:02 PM looks like 4 more floors + roof plant. current floor height-120m/lev29, core must be a few levels above? llooks good WitchKing February 21st, 2009, 07:21 AM sorry about the bad quality http://www.magmabeads.com/test/tower.jpg Marty_ February 21st, 2009, 08:10 AM Fantastic angle though, WitchKing. The whole building looks as if it's leaning to the right. It's spinning me out a little. Hopefully it's just visual trickery ;) WitchKing February 21st, 2009, 09:45 AM yeah it does look like its leaning... lol |