Population primed to head North [Archive] - SkyscraperCity

PDA

View Full Version : Population primed to head North


JayT
March 3rd, 2005, 03:45 AM
Population primed to head north

Malcolm Cole
11feb05
FAR north Queensland faces a population boom over the next 20 years, exceeding the growth predicted for Brisbane and raising concerns about infrastructure for communities outside the state's southeast.



State Government projections show the far north's population is expected to grow by 43.1 per cent between 2001 and 2026, compared with 38.9 per cent in Brisbane.

The Moreton region, including Ipswich, will experience the strongest growth over the 25 years, with its population tipped to swell by 81.3 per cent.

But all coastal regions are expected to grow by at least 30 per cent, prompting concerns the southeast region is receiving too much funding for infrastructure and growth compared with other areas.

Nationals transport spokeswoman Fiona Simpson said there were growing concerns in northern Queensland "that the future growth funding will all be dumped into Ipswich to build their mega-city, and future growth funding won't be available for the other regions".

"There's a major issue of equity in what's in the Government's plans for the future," Ms Simpson said.

State Development Minister Tony McGrady this week called for public comment on a development plan for Townsville, saying the Government was keen to manage growth in that area.

In total, Queensland's population is projected to grow from 3.6 million people in 2001 to 5.3 million in 2026 and 6.5 million in 2051.

The Courier-Mail's State of the State series has found Queensland's communities to be more culturally and economically diverse than at any other time in the state's history.

The previous economic strengths of agriculture and primary industries have given way to the retail trade and the service sectors, where most Queenslanders are now employed.

More than 17 per cent of the state's population was born overseas, with most of the recent arrivals coming from New Zealand, the UK, South Africa, the Philippines and Taiwan.

About 3.1 per cent of Queenslanders have an indigenous background, with 77.4 per cent of this group identifying themselves as Aboriginal, 14.6 per cent calling themselves Torres Strait Islander, and 8 per cent identified as both.

As in other areas, the image of the traditional family is fading, with couples delaying parenthood and a growing number choosing to remain childless altogether.

Queenslanders prefer the movies over the theatre, but also enjoy botanic gardens, zoos, aquariums and libraries.

http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,12210715%255E39135,00.html
jt

Malt
March 3rd, 2005, 04:00 AM
read that a while ago...

Dean
March 3rd, 2005, 04:14 AM
interesting article. There are some lovely places north of Brisbane, particularly along the coastal reagions, and with Queensland such a large state it would be a shame if growth was concentrated just in the south. With land values there still a lot cheaper than the southern states it would be very appealing for people from Melbourne or sydney to sell up and move north. The only problem i can see is that the state will become further decentralised and this could pose longer term problems in regards to updating and maintaining infrastructure over a much larger scaled area.

Cheers

Dean - Melbourne

Oriolus
March 3rd, 2005, 06:16 AM
Vote Yes for North Queensland state :D

Orfeo
March 3rd, 2005, 08:13 AM
I found this article a little weird because Ipswich was put in Moreton, instead of Brisbane as it usually is. It is good to see the north growing though.

Did anyone read about the plan prepared by Ernst and Young with critisised the state government for being conservative in population estimates. here (http://www.qbr.com.au/index.cfm?storyid=21490&cp=displaystory.cfm)

GMAC
March 3rd, 2005, 08:22 AM
This subject raises so many questions as to where funds should be sent and how population should effect this. While I wouldnt like to see Queensland split into two states and can never see it happening, there is no pretence for this sought of growth anywhere in the country with WA the only other state anywhere near physical size but with far less density this far away from the Main population.

NSW seems to be very Sydneycentric but this is less of a problem with Brisbane servicing most of Northern NSW and Melbourne servicing most of southern NSW.

I have to wonder why the Federal Govt doesnt play a bigger role as far as infrastructure goes, surely the population of Australia is growing at a significant rate that this should be more of an issue.

Gertzy
March 3rd, 2005, 01:25 PM
Yes, lets vote for a North Queensland State, Rocky Springs should be the Capital :yes:
As it is a newly Planned City.

Oriolus
March 4th, 2005, 06:12 AM
Rocky Springs will just be a collection of suburbs of Townsville - if parliament was located there (and I think that's a bad idea - should be in the CBD) Townsville would be the capital city and parliament would just happen to be in the suburb of Rocky Springs. Like federal parliament is located in the suburb of Capital Hill but we say Canberra is the capital.

ABS
March 4th, 2005, 05:13 PM
I reocn it would be good to have North Queensland as a state. :)

Gertzy
March 4th, 2005, 06:01 PM
So am I, but then It would cause Outcry to alot of people.

Malt
March 4th, 2005, 06:23 PM
I found this article a little weird because Ipswich was put in Moreton, instead of Brisbane as it usually is. It is good to see the north growing though.

Did anyone read about the plan prepared by Ernst and Young with critisised the state government for being conservative in population estimates. here (http://www.qbr.com.au/index.cfm?storyid=21490&cp=displaystory.cfm)


Thats both good and bad news.If the Govt can get its act together we could have an extremly vibrant city with multiple centres throughout the suburbs, and an even bigger CBD.

If not.. maybe well have some more sprawl :)


weblogUpdates.ping SkyscraperCity - Powered by vBulletin http://www.skyscrapercity.com/