I've noticed (a while ago already) that some voters in this section seem to contradict themselves in their comments and their vote. They say, that they don't like a building/skyline and still give it a 5 or even better. I think it would be good, if we give for every poll option a short description. For example:

10 - my personal best building/skyline of the world
9,5 and 9 - one of my favourite buildings/skylines
8,5 and 8 - a very good building/skyline
7,5 and 7 - a good building/skyline
6,5 and 6 - a decent building/skyline
5,5 and 5 - average
4,5 and 4 - boring
3,5 - would be better if it wouldn't exist
3 or less - I hate it! What pills did the architects/city planners took?

Something like this added to the RoT rules would be nice in hope that there are not so many confusing vote/comment combinations anymore. People who open new polls don't have to write the descriptions into the poll options (would be nice though).

well I have something I call a 'pity vote'
it's the average I give to dull skylines, to which I have nothing special to say.
If I really hate something then it would be below.
on Superpolis it's a 6.
on RoS a 7, RoT a 5, RoA a 7

you get all sorts in there really!

I guess it adds to the interest of the thread where you dont get a uniform reply.

The real problem are the trolls who quietly register and start downvoting/upvoting buildings on purpose.

A few have been caught several times, and all their efforts at reregistering wasted;)

hm... so there's a system now to rid of those people who voted 3 or less in those classic scrapers eh?

Anyways RoT is all about personal opinion. No use whining about it.

Anyways RoT is all about personal opinion. No use whining about it.

Yes, of course. But without a proper classification a poll is pointless, if for some voters a 6 is good and for others bad.