PDA

View Full Version : Millennium Park Development News


Chi_Coruscant
May 12th, 2005, 02:17 PM
I thought it is an interesting article to read.

Millennium Park seeds forecast of dollars in bloom
Real estate, hotels, restaurants among likely winners, study suggests
By Thomas A. Corfman
Tribune staff reporter
Published May 12, 2005


Despite cost overruns, construction delays and revenue shortfalls, Millennium Park may unexpectedly prove to be an effective economic development tool.

The 24.5-acre park will spark $1.4 billion in new residential construction in the East Loop over the next 10 years, according to a study commissioned by the city's Department of Planning and Development. Tourist spending is projected to surpass $1.9 billion during the same period.

While the study identifies a trend toward residential development in the East Loop that the city was already encouraging, it also highlights increased use of the lakefront, which could influence future planning, said Planning Commissioner Denise Casalino.

"Not only Millennium Park, but the amount of residents that are going to be lining Grant Park is transforming Grant Park," she said.

Millennium Park attracted slightly less than 1 million visitors last year after its July 15 opening, with popular attractions such as the wading pool with video towers and ice rink. The latest feature, outdoor art galleries, is scheduled to open next month.

The study sheds a new financial perspective on the costly park, which despite its broader economic benefits has had difficulty paying for itself.

The $490 million project was partly paid for with $220 million in donations, largely from corporations. But nearly two-thirds of the remaining cost was financed with bonds to be repaid by revenue from the park's underground garage. But that revenue has fallen substantially short of projections, forcing the city to tap other sources of cash.

Last week city officials said they would rent out the park Sept. 8 for a private meeting of Toyota car dealers for $800,000, a move that has caused some concerns.

And the city is seeking to renegotiate a controversial concession contract for the Park Grill, which they now say was too favorable to the restaurant's politically influential investors.

Despite these questions, visitor spending connected to the park could add more than $180 million in revenue from hotel and other taxes over the next 10 years, according to the report.

But the key to Millennium Park's economic impact is the study's prediction that attendance will triple this year, to 3 million people, and that subsequently the park will grow gradually in popularity.

The park's effect on business is undeniable but difficult to calculate, said the general manager of the Fairmont Hotel, a block away at 200 N. Columbus Drive.

"Can you quantify the room nights for Central Park in New York? No, you can't," said Kevin Frid. "Do we know it's a tremendous attraction, one of the attractions for people to go there? Yes, we do."

The report says restaurants and retailers should also feel some benefit.

"I think it's going to help Wabash Avenue significantly, being the shot in the arm that it needs to revive itself," Casalino said.

Located between State Street and Michigan Avenue and covered by elevated tracks, Wabash has shown scant signs of a rebound.

The $50,000 study was conducted by Goodman Williams Group Inc., a small Chicago real estate research firm, and URS Corp., a large planning and design company based in San Francisco.

The study looked at the area bounded by the Chicago River, State Street, Roosevelt Road and Lake Michigan.

The researchers predict that 10,000 residential units will be added to the area between 2005 and 2014, based on the nearly 3,700 units to be completed over the next three years. The study predicts an average unit price of $560,000, or $400 a square foot.

The study uses two approaches to determine the $1.4 billion impact of the park on residential development. The first approach looks at how the park has increased demand for housing in the area. Of the 10,000 units to be completed by 2014, about 25 percent are assumed to be the result of demand generated by the park, based on interviews conducted during the study.

The second approach looks at prices, assuming that demand for housing is not affected. Based on sales data, prospective home buyers are willing to pay on average $100 a square foot more for a dwelling in the area compared to nearby areas, the study found.

Residential consultant Tracy Cross cautioned against drawing too close a connection between the park and the surrounding development, noting the area's location.

But Millennium Park has contributed more broadly to the residential market in the city's core, said the president of Tracy Cross & Associates Inc. of Schaumburg.

"The park adds a dimension that wasn't there before, an incredible enhancement to what was already a 24/7 living environment," he said.

The study's attendance prediction of 3 million people this year is based on several factors, including last year's results and interviews. The study assumes that park visitors mirror overall visitors to the city, in terms of the nature of the visit and the average amounts spent. But the study assumes only a portion of the spending is prompted by the park.

For example, the study assumes that 70 percent of the spending by day-trip visitors is due to the park.

International visitors, who stay longer and see numerous city attractions, spend only 10 percent of their money because of the park.

An expert in the economic impact of tourism called the attendance forecast a "weak link" in the study, and said the breakdown of visitors required further study.

Increased spending near the park may mean that visitors are not spending at restaurants and hotels elsewhere in Chicago, resulting in "less of a net gain overall to the city," said Daniel Stynes, a professor emeritus at Michigan State University.

But the park has enhanced the city's reputation nationally, he added.

"This reputation yields far greater economic and social dividends than are captured by nearby property values or estimates of visitor spending," he said.

ChicagoLover
May 12th, 2005, 09:27 PM
From www.slate.com:


Chicago's Magic Kingdom
Is Millennium Park a theme park for adults?
By Witold Rybczynski


The great urban park was a 19th-century American invention. It's unlikely that we will ever again build anything as ambitious as Central Park, Golden Gate Park, or Boston's Emerald Necklace. Land is simply too expensive and cities are too poor—just maintaining the parks that they've inherited strains their budgets. In any case, despite their popularity, urban parks with their old-fashioned cast-iron benches and their winding footpaths are a throwback to a politer, more reflective time. We build theme parks, not urban parks.

Chicagoans obviously don't agree. The city has just spent almost half a billion dollars on Millennium Park, which opened last July. In its first six months, the downtown park has attracted more than 1.5 million visitors. This is an impressive number considering the park is only 24.5 acres—Central Park gets 20 million visitors annually, but it covers more than 800 acres. On a visitor-per-acre scale, Millennium Park must be the most popular park in the country.

Chicago's new park may not be large, but it is crammed with attractions. The most prominent is a band shell and a large lawn (called, inevitably, the Great Lawn) that together can accommodate 11,000 people. In addition, there are fountains, sculptures, a large garden, event spaces, a restaurant, a bicycle station, and a 1,500-seat music and dance theater. The whole thing is built on top of a three-level parking garage and railroad tracks.

Continue Article

Jaume Plensa's fountain Click image to expand.

Jaume Plensa's fountain
On a recent visit, it struck me that in many ways Millennium Park is a theme park. In one corner is Burnham's World, which includes a Classical peristyle of fluted Doric columns, a formal lawn, lots of urns and formal planting beds, and light standards designed by the great Chicago architect Daniel Burnham. Nearby is the Not-So-Enchanted Forest. Conceived by Kathryn Gustafson in an edgy, chic style, the three acres of prairielike landscape behind a topiary of flowering trees include a diagonal boardwalk and a water-course that resembles an industrial sluice. Next door, Artland consists of two plazas: one with Anish Kapoor's stainless-steel sculpture (under wraps when I visited), titled Cloud Gate but known locally as "the Bean"; and Spanish sculptor Jaume Plensa's fountain. At first glance, the twin 50-foot rectangular prisms with water cascading down their glass-block faces look like leaky cooling towers. But the installation grows on you. Human faces are projected on the giant interactive video screens, which sounds corny but is curiously appealing and sometimes quite funny. The shallow pool is artfully designed to encourage wading.

Gehry's band shell Click image to expand.

Gehry's band shell
Millennium Park even has its Cinderella Castle. Frank Gehry was an inspired choice to design the band shell. It is obvious by now that Gehry is the most accomplished Baroque architect since Borromini, and his exuberant confection is an ideal expression of music in the park. The gridded steel-and-glass high-rise towers of Michigan Avenue provide a perfect backdrop for his sculptural, freewheeling architecture.

The attractions of Millennium Park, which also include a strip of indoor and outdoor eateries facing a skating rink, are experienced individually, but—like most theme parks—they don't mesh into a coherent whole. That's a shame, but it may be inevitable, given that this is an attempt to appeal to a wide variety of tastes and sensibilities. It's also a shame that Millennium Park has not learned an important lesson from the Magic Kingdom. The presence of so many security personnel, in bright orange vests, is much too obtrusive. They wander suspiciously around like museum guards (or tool around on Segways). It is as if, having created this public space, the authorities don't quite trust us to behave. There are far too many signs, too—explaining, naming, directing, prohibiting. Corporate and private sponsorship paid for almost half the cost of the park, as we are ceaselessly reminded. But the most poignant of the signs are the ones that warn, "No Loitering." As if there was any other reason to go to a park.

Witold Rybczynski is Slate's architecture critic.

mypetrobot
May 12th, 2005, 09:57 PM
i never thought of it as a adult theme park but its so true though.

also on a side note since the bandshell is steel is going rust easily? whats it going to look like 20 years from now when the chicago weather has given it a beating.

geoff_diamond
May 12th, 2005, 11:14 PM
The facade of the bandshell is actually titanium, not steel. Rusting won't be an issue.

The Urban Politician
May 13th, 2005, 12:23 AM
It really says "no loitering" in Millennium Park?

That's outright hilarious

geoff_diamond
May 13th, 2005, 03:41 AM
I don't recall ever seeing that anywhere?

Chicago3rd
May 19th, 2005, 04:07 AM
http://wilthe3rd.smugmug.com/photos/22465216-L.jpg

wrabbit
May 19th, 2005, 04:37 AM
The facade of the bandshell is actually titanium, not steel. Rusting won't be an issue.

Geoff: I believe that while Gehry's original plans called for titanium, the Pritzkers nonetheless changed over to stainless in the end to save $...
Then again, you are almost always right about such things :)

geoff_diamond
May 19th, 2005, 04:45 AM
Then again, you are almost always right about such things

Har... if only that were true :). I originally thought it was stainless as well, but, I've read in countless places and heard from countless professors that it was titanium. I guess I just started to believe the hype. I wonder if there's any way we can ever really find out?

geoff_diamond
May 19th, 2005, 04:53 AM
See? I told you that I wished it were true that I was usually right.

Shortly after the above post my curiosity got the best of me and I set out to see if I couldn't find the answer to the question.

According to the Chicago Public Building Commission's web site, 5200 interlocking stainless steel sheets cover the Gehry ribbons.

wickedestcity
May 19th, 2005, 05:54 AM
that blows. titanium would have been awsome

Latoso
May 19th, 2005, 06:45 AM
That sucks! What's the point in loitering now?

The Urban Politician
May 19th, 2005, 06:57 AM
That sucks! What's the point in loitering now?

Isn't "loitering" what you're supposed to do in public parks?

I'm sure you're still allowed to loiter in spirit. Perhaps that sign is meant for the homeless.

I don't know, though--there sure are a hell of a lot of cops/security at Millennium Park. Very suspicious..

Chicago3rd
May 19th, 2005, 03:52 PM
Isn't "loitering" what you're supposed to do in public parks?

I'm sure you're still allowed to loiter in spirit. Perhaps that sign is meant for the homeless.

I don't know, though--there sure are a hell of a lot of cops/security at Millennium Park. Very suspicious..

Am sure it is an ordinance set up to give park police some in if there is a problem.

wrabbit
May 19th, 2005, 04:48 PM
I don't know, though--there sure are a hell of a lot of cops/security at Millennium Park. Very suspicious..

Yeah - as it stands, MP security is far too conspicuous and arbitrary. I'm reminded of those uncomfortable plastic-covered sofas in great-autie's living room - why go to such lengths to protect something from the very purpose for which it was intended?

Last Summer, for about 6 weeks after opening, there was a row between security and dog owners (3 different policies enforced, with no signage); then, the row between security and photographers using tripods (some guards saying okay, some not okay, some okay only with permit...); then, before the recent installation of benches around Crown Fountain, the constant shooing of sitters on the slope and ledge just to the North of the fountain (I swear, the city was posting a guard there just to keep people from sitting. Really.) God forbid that anyone should toss a frisbee in one of the promenades!

I go to MP often, just to soak in the fantastic urban vistas, and to see all of those happy faces - part of me always feels as though I'm walking on eggshells. I'm constantly glancing up at the guards, to be sure I'm not doing anything wrong, as though I were back in grade school.

City Hall really needs to draft a coherant set of prohibitions, needs to post them in the Park in a visable but non-threatening way, and so very badly needs to train its security in what those prohibitions are & how to enforce them.

The Urban Politician
May 19th, 2005, 05:35 PM
Yeah - as it stands, MP security is far too conspicuous and arbitrary. I'm reminded of those uncomfortable plastic-covered sofas in great-autie's living room - why go to such lengths to protect something from the very purpose for which it was intended?

Last Summer, for about 6 weeks after opening, there was a row between security and dog owners (3 different policies enforced, with no signage); then, the row between security and photographers using tripods (some guards saying okay, some not okay, some okay only with permit...); then, before the recent installation of benches around Crown Fountain, the constant shooing of sitters on the slope and ledge just to the North of the fountain (I swear, the city was posting a guard there just to keep people from sitting. Really.) God forbid that anyone should toss a frisbee in one of the promenades!

I go to MP often, just to soak in the fantastic urban vistas, and to see all of those happy faces - part of me always feels as though I'm walking on eggshells. I'm constantly glancing up at the guards, to be sure I'm not doing anything wrong, as though I were back in grade school.

City Hall really needs to draft a coherant set of prohibitions, needs to post them in the Park in a visable but non-threatening way, and so very badly needs to train its security in what those prohibitions are & how to enforce them.

^I TOTALLY agree. I have walked through Millennium Park only twice, both times only 10-15 minutes, and I also experienced the "eggshells" phenomenon. I guess they're trying to protect its assets--after all, the friggin thing cost nearly half a billion dollars to build! Perhaps 20-30 years from now, security will be much lighter...

geoff_diamond
May 19th, 2005, 06:16 PM
I just think it could be handled more delicately. There is absolutely no need for security to be so rude, they could still do their job while killing us with kindness - it would all seem so much more acceptable then.

24gotham
May 20th, 2005, 03:48 AM
I have had various experiences with security at MP. I have delt with snotty ones telling me I can't take photos (to which I say, arrest me Bitch.) as well as a few very nice ones.
One of them, thinking I was a tourist, started to point out different buildings along Michigan Ave, giving not the most accurate info (she was off by decades on the dates of a few buildings), but I felt it was the effort that really mattered. If I was a tourist (I didn't tell her that I lived here), I would have most likely never known she was not quite accurate, and thought "What a nice Chicagoan, she really loves her city."

As for taking photos, I don't give a f*ck if they want to stop me, they have no legal ground to stand on, as I am not a professional, and only use them for my use, and to publish to the web. :)

Origami
August 16th, 2006, 04:19 AM
Anyone watch this?

7 Wonders of Chicago on WTTW:

http://www.wttw.com/main.taf?erube_fh=wttw&wttw.submit.EpisodeDetail=1&wttw.EpisodeID=128669&wttw.Channel=WTTW