waterloo
June 13th, 2005, 10:39 PM
Didnt really liked him with his North Korean flag avatar and his interest in Marxism and Maoism...What happend? How did he get banned?
|
View Full Version : daniel_18 how did he get banned? waterloo June 13th, 2005, 10:39 PM Didnt really liked him with his North Korean flag avatar and his interest in Marxism and Maoism...What happend? How did he get banned? Arpels June 13th, 2005, 10:42 PM Daniel was banned? :uh: Skybean June 13th, 2005, 10:47 PM Yay. some_stupid_nut June 13th, 2005, 11:00 PM Who? Petronius June 13th, 2005, 11:11 PM shit! he was such a nice guy Aquarius June 13th, 2005, 11:15 PM http://www.skyscrapercity.com/announcement.php?f=276&announcementid=119 Dennis June 13th, 2005, 11:16 PM Daniel who? GeorgeCostanza2 June 13th, 2005, 11:54 PM the dude from Florida? VansTripp June 14th, 2005, 12:50 AM Yeah, He's from Miami, FL. VansTripp June 14th, 2005, 12:52 AM http://www.skyscrapercity.com/member.php?u=6039 Check out then u will know about who is him. VansTripp June 14th, 2005, 12:56 AM I'm surprised that he got banned for no reason but I cannot understand to read in spanish language. He did nothing on US forum and Florida/Miami forum. I did surprised about CJ@LoS_SaNtOs, he is my favorite person on LA forum but he posted Dubai and New Zealand more often though. What happened with him? PS: There is english translate for non-spanish forumer below. M16A2 and daniel_18, expelled by 14 and 21 days respectively... The reason responds to serious insults that both postearon in thread of "FIDEL I CASTRATE IS a TYRANT". Chibcha2k June 14th, 2005, 01:42 AM he was banned after insulting other forumers on a thread called "fidel castro is a tyrant"...we was asked to moderate his language before...but he tends to use a quite offensive language against anyone who doesn't share his ideas. Gilgamesh June 14th, 2005, 01:54 AM Yay. You said it :okay: ironchapman June 14th, 2005, 06:15 AM His sig had a link to a forum that discussed the good parts of communism...that scared me. Glad he was banned. VansTripp June 14th, 2005, 09:50 AM His sig had a link to a forum that discussed the good parts of communism...that scared me. Glad he was banned. Wow. Küsel June 14th, 2005, 10:12 AM You guys have all a problem with tolerance as it seems. I am not talking about the banning, if he was offending other people (like I do now :lol:) it's okay, I also hate personal attacks. But what is wrong with sympathyzing with communism???? Are we still in the McCarthy era? Is only neoliberalism allowed to support here? If yes, why make a forum if we can't exchange our oppinions? For an interesting argument it always needs several different oppinions otherwise we would be all followers of a Führer or Guru and that's exactly the opposite of what a forum is all about! VansTripp June 14th, 2005, 09:53 PM He seems innocent to me. easysurfer June 14th, 2005, 10:35 PM double post easysurfer June 14th, 2005, 10:37 PM You guys have all a problem with tolerance as it seems. I am not talking about the banning, if he was offending other people (like I do now :lol:) it's okay, I also hate personal attacks. But what is wrong with sympathyzing with communism???? Are we still in the McCarthy era? Is only neoliberalism allowed to support here? If yes, why make a forum if we can't exchange our oppinions? For an interesting argument it always needs several different oppinions otherwise we would be all followers of a Führer or Guru and that's exactly the opposite of what a forum is all about! Because communism has never worked as it is fundamentally flawed. It always gives rise to extreme corruption and poverty. Free market society gives a far better chance of individual rights and equality. Let's look at the former communist or those still blighted by a communist government. Russia, Cuba, China. Any other suggestions? banned_ June 19th, 2005, 02:57 AM Didnt really liked him with his North Korean flag avatar and his interest in Marxism and Maoism...What happend? How did he get banned? I was banned because I "insulted" someone after they insulted me. banned_ June 19th, 2005, 02:59 AM Because communism has never worked as it is fundamentally flawed. It always gives rise to extreme corruption and poverty. Free market society gives a far better chance of individual rights and equality. Let's look at the former communist or those still blighted by a communist government. Russia, Cuba, China. Any other suggestions? How can communism never work if it has never been applied? What has been applied is socialism, which is far superior to capitalism. A free market society does not offer individual rights or equality. banned_ June 19th, 2005, 03:00 AM he was banned after insulting other forumers on a thread called "fidel castro is a tyrant"...we was asked to moderate his language before...but he tends to use a quite offensive language against anyone who doesn't share his ideas. Stop lying. Can you show me where I have offended someone because they don't share my ideas? Petronius June 19th, 2005, 03:59 AM Because communism has never worked as it is fundamentally flawed. It always gives rise to extreme corruption and poverty. Free market society gives a far better chance of individual rights and equality. Let's look at the former communist or those still blighted by a communist government. Russia, Cuba, China. Any other suggestions? so what if he likes communism? I'm with Kuesel... Even if you think like that , he's entitled to think and defend that for him communism is a good thing. We are still living in a free world! Sen June 19th, 2005, 04:25 AM communism never worked because no real communists ever existed!. except che maybe... Cuba shouldnt be a exmple of failure of communism, 70's china and soviet union were certainly were...Cuba could be prosperous if US doesnt impose trade sanctions on it...even now Cuba has great healthcare and social care system...Cubans are better off than most people on earth. Chibcha2k June 19th, 2005, 04:58 AM Stop lying. Can you show me where I have offended someone because they don't share my ideas? i can show it...with pleasure :) Chibcha2k June 19th, 2005, 05:01 AM BTW, stop creating parallel accounts...you'll risk to have more punishments Chibcha2k June 19th, 2005, 05:11 AM Thread:http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=222714&page=2&pp=20 "Cholo" quiere decir indígena en sudamericano, ¿verdad? Yo no sabía que era posible meter tanta ignorancia en un párafo tan pequeño. Vete al circo. Vete al circo tu también. Je, dicen los dos racistas ignorantes mas grandes del foro. these aint so bad as others, but the threads have ended closed and deleted so is very hard to find evidence Küsel June 21st, 2005, 11:21 AM so what if he likes communism? I'm with Kuesel... Even if you think like that , he's entitled to think and defend that for him communism is a good thing. We are still living in a free world! Thanks! That's exactly a proving post: tolerance in the "free world" has not a high value. How can someone stand for freedom and hate people who think differently - it's a contradiction. The only ones I really don't like are the right-wing-extremists and neo-nazis. But does it help to forbid them or their parties? No, like that they even can make PR out of the situation. The only thing that helps is acceptance, integration and education. And about Communism doesn't work: it's because there is hardly any examples of real communism - Fidel, Kim, Stalin... all dictators, you just can't call that communism. Closest would come the Kibutzniks. Anyway: Fidel is longer in his position than any other world leader and still healthy although the CIA tried to kill him several times! Chapeau!! i_am_hydrogen June 21st, 2005, 11:25 AM ^ I agree. Kampflamm June 21st, 2005, 11:44 AM I remember seeing him make some very positive statements about Stalin. If I had done the same about Hitler I would have been banned in no time. Küsel June 21st, 2005, 12:36 PM No big difference to Hitler anyway... the Great Pig Napoleon... Stalin was maybe one of the most anti-communist dictator ever ;) Bikkel June 21st, 2005, 01:12 PM I remember seeing him make some very positive statements about Stalin. If I had done the same about Hitler I would have been banned in no time. that's because Hitler set Europe on fire while before him, Deutschland was a reasonably properous country with a reasonably democratic society. Russia was poor, feudal and backward. And improved, measured by any standard, under Stalin. Küsel June 21st, 2005, 01:27 PM Since when Germany was prosperous and an important partner country before Hitler? It was in after-shock of WWI and the Versailles Treaty as well as the crash of 29, was suffering embargos and internal political crisis - the Weihmarer Republik was everything else than a stable system, unemployment was high and the whole situation was a very good soil for Hitler's ideals... :( The only prosperous place was Berlin. el tico June 21st, 2005, 02:10 PM You guys have all a problem with tolerance as it seems. I am not talking about the banning, if he was offending other people (like I do now :lol:) it's okay, I also hate personal attacks. But what is wrong with sympathyzing with communism???? Are we still in the McCarthy era? Is only neoliberalism allowed to support here? If yes, why make a forum if we can't exchange our oppinions? For an interesting argument it always needs several different oppinions otherwise we would be all followers of a Führer or Guru and that's exactly the opposite of what a forum is all about! It's not a matter of being a communist or not, nor is it about tolerance, the guy's insults just got out of hand, it can happen to anyone, and believe me, I saw (or read) the whole thing. I read one of the insults and said to myself..."oh no, they're gonna ban this dude...", three minutes later I saw that the moderators had just banned him, and publicly announced his temporary ban because of his insults. So lets not confuse everything... :cheers: Küsel June 21st, 2005, 03:03 PM I think, you misunderstood me... I was not posting against the banning of trolls who just insult people, I hate them as well - it was against some of the posts here that were not gerenally against trolling. Sorry about that! Cool, you seem to be a Swiss-mate as well :cheers: - we really should open soon a multilingual Swiss forum! :) Bikkel June 21st, 2005, 03:30 PM Since when Germany was prosperous and an important partner country before Hitler? It was in after-shock of WWI and the Versailles Treaty as well as the crash of 29, was suffering embargos and internal political crisis - the Weihmarer Republik was everything else than a stable system, unemployment was high and the whole situation was a very good soil for Hitler's ideals... :( The only prosperous place was Berlin.Well it wasn't on a par with England but it was prosperous compared to Russia and many important changes took place: popularising film, Bauhaus Before Hitler people had food, housing, entertainment and freedom of choice, Russia had none of that. Deutschland did not see fighting or bombing at home until 1940. Things were going wrong and that started at a high level and by 1945 the country was in ruins. Hitler had a devastating effect on his country in just 12 years. Stalin stayed in power, won a war and ruled a poor country to no greater disaster. He was a ruthless dictator, yet on the scale of Hitler, I'd rate Stalin less evil. Küsel June 21st, 2005, 03:43 PM I didn't mean in comparisment with Russia, that was in a total different situation and locked away since the revolution (apart from some later "agreements" with Germany). But Germany was much less stable and rich as a whole in comparisment to other western nations. Otherwise Hitler wouldn't have gotten so much power at the beginning (later he reached it by eliminting the political enemies). And the Exis and other artists were also persecuted under Hitler - like Paul Klee. But clear before they had a lot of personal freedom. Kampflamm June 21st, 2005, 08:02 PM that's because Hitler set Europe on fire while before him, Deutschland was a reasonably properous country with a reasonably democratic society. Russia was poor, feudal and backward. And improved, measured by any standard, under Stalin. Yes and he only killed millions of people in the process. :crazy: Did I mention that Stalin enslaved half of the continent? Küsel June 21st, 2005, 10:17 PM And brought the country into financial ruin, was responsible for starvation by misleading wheat trains to Sibiria, killed tenthousands in Gulags etc... The Mad Hatter!! June 21st, 2005, 10:50 PM Thread:http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=222714&page=2&pp=20 THATS IT.......IF YOU BAN HIM FOR THAT THAN YOURE A COME-MIERDA i really don't like the fact that were banning people for them expressing themselves hey if he likes commuinsm than good for him......but he might want to watch out saying that outloud here in miami..lots of cubans..they're always so sensitive to the subject. anyways i say we should unban him, or something like that el tico June 22nd, 2005, 02:17 AM I think, you misunderstood me... I was not posting against the banning of trolls who just insult people, I hate them as well - it was against some of the posts here that were not gerenally against trolling. Sorry about that! Cool, you seem to be a Swiss-mate as well :cheers: - we really should open soon a multilingual Swiss forum! :) Ok, sorry if I misunderstood you... Yeah, too bad there's no Swiss sub-forum! We gotta do something about that, cause I know there are a whole bunch of other Swiss guys around. We could make it multilingual just like you say. I think there was a thread about wanting to make one, I posted a comment on it not long ago. :cheers: el tico June 22nd, 2005, 02:26 AM THATS IT.......IF YOU BAN HIM FOR THAT THAN YOURE A COME-MIERDA i really don't like the fact that were banning people for them expressing themselves hey if he likes commuinsm than good for him......but he might want to watch out saying that outloud here in miami..lots of cubans..they're always so sensitive to the subject. anyways i say we should unban him, or something like that Believe me, he wasn't banned JUST for that... It was much worse, but I think the thread or the posts were deleted. And don't worry, he'll be back soon, it's not as if he were banned for life. :) Küsel June 22nd, 2005, 09:56 AM Ok, sorry if I misunderstood you... Yeah, too bad there's no Swiss sub-forum! We gotta do something about that, cause I know there are a whole bunch of other Swiss guys around. We could make it multilingual just like you say. I think there was a thread about wanting to make one, I posted a comment on it not long ago. :cheers: There is already a thread about it here in "About the Forums" - you're welcome to discuss and enforce the founding of the new Subforum :) DarkLite June 22nd, 2005, 06:00 PM how do i get banned?? i dont want to and i just want to know the rules TalB June 22nd, 2005, 09:43 PM I don't see anything wrong with disagreeing on communisum. Even I see it as something bad, and I am a liberal. Sometimes, I feel if others don't like the way I think, then it's really their problem, not mine hence they should put away the stick b/c it doesn't help them with anything. :poke: Bikkel June 23rd, 2005, 06:54 AM Yes and he only killed millions of people in the process. :crazy: Did I mention that Stalin enslaved half of the continent? You still don't get it. Hitler was a drastic change from Hindenburg, Weimar etc. Stalin was no different from a Czar - people died by the million before Stalin just the same. The Soviet Union had no gas-chambers. It's quite sad how people can't distinguish dictatorships. Deutschland was far better off than France or Italy or Spain. Only the UK, CH, NL and Czecho-Slovakia were more prosperous. Fascist politicians in France lacked the charisma Hitler had. And he didn't get to power with a majority vote. It's not all historical materialism, the human factor did play a role. Kampflamm June 23rd, 2005, 10:08 AM That still doesn't make Stalin a better or nicer person. Fact of the matter is that both Stalin and Hitler killed millions of people. What happened in both countries before that doesn't really matter and your argument that everything was just business as usual in Russia is simply not true. AltinD June 23rd, 2005, 06:40 PM ^ Stalin killed only his political oponents, while Hitler killed anyone that he though was different from him: jews, gays, roms, comunists, monarchists, dark skinned, mentally retarded ... Afterall Hitler started the war not Stalin. daniel_18 July 4th, 2005, 08:19 AM I'm back. :D daniel_18 July 4th, 2005, 08:21 AM That still doesn't make Stalin a better or nicer person. Fact of the matter is that both Stalin and Hitler killed millions of people. What happened in both countries before that doesn't really matter and your argument that everything was just business as usual in Russia is simply not true. You're right. Stalin was far, far better than a czar. daniel_18 July 4th, 2005, 08:25 AM And brought the country into financial ruin, was responsible for starvation by misleading wheat trains to Sibiria, killed tenthousands in Gulags etc... Please explain how Stalin brought into the country financial ruin. VansTripp July 4th, 2005, 08:27 AM daniel_18, I'm glad that you are back. :okay: daniel_18 July 4th, 2005, 08:33 AM I don't see anything wrong with disagreeing on communisum. And I don't see anything wrong with disagreeing with ZioNazism. daniel_18 July 4th, 2005, 08:34 AM Thank you, Blink. :) Kampflamm July 4th, 2005, 09:06 AM Since Daniel has a flag of North Korea as his avatar, can one now use a Nazi flag as well? XiaoBai July 4th, 2005, 09:53 AM ^I don't know, let me change my avatar real quick and see what happens... :D New Jack City July 5th, 2005, 02:00 AM No need for this thread, case closed. |