View Full Version : ADELAIDE: 223 North Terrace 16 levels/48m
Will February 3rd, 2003, 09:42 AM This 16 storey building has been approved for Adelaide's North Terrace, construction will begin in a few weeks.
This building will be 16 stories high, and be around 45m tall.
It is a mixed use building, as the bottom 8 floors will serve as a public carpark, and the top 8 floors will be luxury apartments.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid49/pa3cbd3c4a0b0608fc9878b4f915774c0/fcb11848.jpg
tayser February 3rd, 2003, 09:55 AM added to quicklinks
looks interesting - 8 levels of "public" car park though ?
what were / are the prices for apartments up the top ?
cheers
tays
Will February 3rd, 2003, 10:13 AM Tayser - the 8 levels of carparking is for the thousands of people who come into Rundle Mall each day, but undoubtedly some of those spaces will be secured for the tenants.
The prices of apartments in this new tower will range from $300 000 to $1.65 million for the top level penthouses.
AtD February 3rd, 2003, 10:26 AM Will - that picture refuses to work. :mad:
Tays - They'll probably make more money from the car-park than they would with the apartments.
Will February 4th, 2003, 12:34 PM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by AdamTheDuck </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>Will - that picture refuses to work. :mad:
Tays - They'll probably make more money from the car-park than they would with the apartments.</td></tr>
</table>
Adam - sorry I can't help you with the picuture, if it continues to refuse to work try buying this Saturdays Advertiser, because for the last two weeks they've had a full page advertisement, and they'll probably have another one this week (real estate liftout)
AG February 4th, 2003, 12:54 PM I can see the picture alright. :)
Get Culwulla to add this to the 223 North Terrace page of ss.com.
chrisaus February 4th, 2003, 02:20 PM i can see that car park being an eyesore
a boring wall of concrete !!
you would think a few floors of retail would be much more suited to the area as its right near the mall and david jones
AG February 5th, 2003, 08:33 AM I'm not sure, but I think the building is actually 17 levels, not 16, because there are 8 levels of carpark, 8 levels of apartments being built on top, and ground level where there is retail and the carpark entrance.
The carpark is already an eyesore chrisaus, it would look better after the redevelopment is complete but it would look better if it had some similar sized neighbouring buildings around it like at the western end of North Terrace where there are about 7 buildings around 50m tall each bumper to bumper and basically touching each other.
AtD February 5th, 2003, 08:53 AM The picture's working now. Damn computers. :)
The balconies on that thing remind me of egg cartons.
chrisaus February 5th, 2003, 09:14 AM also if there going to have a carpark they should have to put the entry up a rear lane or something
who wants to go shopping and have car park entries separating the shops, and having to watch out for cars on the sidewalk etc...
AtD February 5th, 2003, 12:07 PM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox"><td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by chrisaus </i></b> </smallfont> </td><tr><td align=left valign=top>also if there going to have a carpark they should have to put the entry up a rear lane or something
who wants to go shopping and have car park entries separating the shops, and having to watch out for cars on the sidewalk etc...</td></tr>
</table>
Pedestrians have right of way in driveways (in theory at least), but I still hate crossing them.
That car park already has its own set of lights anyway, IIRC.
AG February 6th, 2003, 10:29 AM Traffic lights control the entrance and exits of this carpark building as Adam said.
AtD February 6th, 2003, 10:34 AM Is it just me, or is there an echo in this thread?
:moods:
jacobsian February 6th, 2003, 11:00 AM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by chrisaus </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>i can see that car park being an eyesore
a boring wall of concrete !!
you would think a few floors of retail would be much more suited to the area as its right near the mall and david jones</td></tr>
</table>
That wall of concrete has been there since the 60's.
Will, thanks for the scan. I must say, I welcome development in Adelaide, but that is just fugly as hell :D
*edit - it's actually starting to grow on me. But couldn't they at least do something to upgrade the facade :(
*edit again :) - damn, why does the render on ss.com look 7 trillion times better? Please don't tell me the museum complained about that other proposal.... that's the best bloody thing i've ever seen! aaarrrgrgghhh!!!!
DrDan February 6th, 2003, 12:44 PM I live the redevelopment. It's a marked improvement, and complements DJs next door.
Will February 8th, 2003, 02:41 AM Yob - the first time I actually saw the building, i thought it was extremelly ugly, but after starring at it, it kind of grows on you, and now I think it's a competent looking building that will improove the look of the area, and the city skyline from Light's lookout.
And yes the old proposal, that is on SS.com was scrapped because the museum, art gallery and the university complained about the look of it, those institutions have less concerns about this new proposal.
AG - The building is 16 stories and 45m high.
Will February 8th, 2003, 02:43 AM Just to re-fresh the memory, this is the original proposal, which has been scrapped for the current one:
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid41/p33fd554ad886eca6ccdf19a99fbf85a3/fcf87ae1.jpg
jacobsian February 8th, 2003, 03:10 AM Heh, my opinion of this building is swinging back and forth every time I look at it. There's a small ad for it in today's 'tiser, and it does look a little better than the scanned pic, colours are a tad more vibrant. I could almost like it I think... we'll just have to wait and see :)
If it turns out being a stinker, they can just plant a few more trees in front of it just in case :)
AG February 9th, 2003, 10:31 AM I don't think it'll look bad when it's finished yob. :)
pikey February 12th, 2003, 10:21 AM Does anyone know when we are gonna see construction start on this???
AG February 12th, 2003, 10:23 AM Construction will start by May 7 or more likely, late April.
jacobsian February 12th, 2003, 11:35 AM yeah late april 2004
DrDan February 12th, 2003, 01:16 PM whoa! That original proposal looks huge! Whilst I don't mind the design, I could question whether it would have fitted in on north terrace.
Will February 13th, 2003, 09:14 AM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by yob </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>yeah late april 2004</td></tr>
</table>
Construction will begin before May 7 of this year.
Steve February 26th, 2003, 03:10 AM Damn, that is one err, 'interesting looking' building! What a shame, the original proposal looks much better.
pikey February 26th, 2003, 06:06 AM I'll just be happy to see some cranes rock up on the site. Anything would look good on that site. Even though this design is not as good as the first in my opinion, it will add to the street scape quite well when it's finished.
AG February 26th, 2003, 12:05 PM Construction start is not far away. Just a few months to go.
pikey March 5th, 2003, 06:04 AM I'm surprised that no billboards or anything have gone up yet. Or am I just not looking hard enough???
AG March 5th, 2003, 08:14 AM No, there are no billboards or addvertisements about this tower up yet as of current.
Will March 5th, 2003, 08:41 AM There may be no bill-boards on site, but the developers are conducting an advertising campaign in the Advertiser.
jacobsian March 9th, 2003, 03:32 AM According to Saturday's paper, Martin Towers has sold 15.7 million worth off the plan. Anybody know the total construction cost?
BTW, this development is starting to really grow on me!
Will March 10th, 2003, 09:27 AM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by yob </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>According to Saturday's paper, Martin Towers has sold 15.7 million worth off the plan. Anybody know the total construction cost?
BTW, this development is starting to really grow on me!</td></tr>
</table>
Yob - the total cost for this project is $50 million.
pikey March 11th, 2003, 10:54 PM You would think with all of the press this project has gotten in the papers and so forth, there would be more signage at the location, to really exentuate the awaesome area that it is?
AtD March 25th, 2003, 11:22 AM I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but there are several different plans and projections of the building on display. They're in what I think is an empty shop on the ground floor of the existing building on Charles Street, just off North Terrace.
Will April 6th, 2003, 09:59 AM It was officially announced in the Saturday Advertiser, that construction has commenced on this landmark development.
pikey April 7th, 2003, 08:09 AM Then, it should go onto SS.com as under construction!!!!!
pikey May 6th, 2003, 07:28 AM Am I just not seeing the construction?? What have they put a bag of concrete on the roof or something. Am I blind cos I can't see any construction starting??
AtD May 6th, 2003, 09:00 AM They're taking their sweet time.
AtD June 4th, 2003, 10:53 AM There was a concrete truck on Austin Street yesterday with its arm reaching up to the 5th or 6th floor of the car park. A bit of preparation, maybe? It was only one truck so don't get all excited and add it to "Under Construction."
AtD June 5th, 2003, 04:50 AM And now there's a bit of scaffolding on the roof.
jacobsian June 5th, 2003, 10:29 AM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by Will </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top><table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by yob </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>yeah late april 2004</td></tr>
</table>
Construction will begin before May 7 of this year.</td></tr>
</table>
:lol:
Will June 8th, 2003, 01:14 PM <table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by yob </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top><table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by Will </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top><table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by yob </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>yeah late april 2004</td></tr>
</table>
Construction will begin before May 7 of this year.</td></tr>
</table>
:lol:</td></tr>
</table>
Just because there isn't a big crane on the site, does not mean construction hasn't started...
AG June 8th, 2003, 02:25 PM Construction probably has actually started on the roof, judging by the fact that there is scaffolding going up, and some of the building materials around the building as well recently. The crane doesn't always go up straight away, it is only put up when it is required.
jacobsian June 14th, 2003, 04:22 AM According to the ad in the paper, 81 apartments sold, construction started.
pikey July 15th, 2003, 04:54 AM Construction definatley has started. the cement black Adam took a photo of are the bases of the protective scaffolding which is currently being put up. The side street was being blocked off andthere was plenty of goings on on the roof. On a side note next doors 14 storey jobbie looks like it's not too far off to sart either. It was being blocked off ready for demolition when I saw it today.
AG July 15th, 2003, 05:00 AM You're absolutely right pikey, cause I was there this morning as well. :D There are concrete blocks around on Austin Street as well.
pikey July 15th, 2003, 05:02 AM Should be fun watching at least 3 cores (2 cores for 223 and one for the other!) and 2 tower cranes (I guess one each) operating in such close proximity!!!!
jacobsian July 15th, 2003, 06:18 AM Originally posted by pikey
Construction definatley has started. the cement black Adam took a photo of are the bases of the protective scaffolding which is currently being put up. The side street was being blocked off andthere was plenty of goings on on the roof. On a side note next doors 14 storey jobbie looks like it's not too far off to sart either. It was being blocked off ready for demolition when I saw it today.
You know it's a good sign when you start forgetting about developments :D Ah yes, the 14 storey doodad, if I remember correctly it's fugly as hell, but it's 14 storeys! :D
What north terrace desperately needs now is a nice big thin fuck off resi sitting in front of the education building on the north terrace side - there's enough room if the 2 level jobbie gets hammered. Either that or replace that frickin facade... man, i will not get a good nights sleep until we win a showd.. er.. until all the fuck off ugly brutalist buildings in the city are gone!
Was down at the bay today, man, gleneld and adelaide are racing eachother, loving it!
pikey July 15th, 2003, 06:40 AM I know what your talking about. The Building, not the showdown!!! That's our claim!!
pikey July 15th, 2003, 06:57 AM So that would mean, currently under construction in Adelaide:
Air Apartments (15 Levels)
223 North Terrace (16 levels)
227 North Terrace (14 Levels)
Horizon Apartments (18 Levels)
Commonwealth Law Courts (12 Levels)
Liberty Towers (15 Levels)
City Cross Shopping Centre (16 Levels)
That 8 Level hotel thingy near Rundle street (8 levels :D)
Not bad for a city that has "no construction at all"
I apologise if I have forgotten anything - nah not really!
AG July 15th, 2003, 07:05 AM I see a lot of mistakes in your list pikey. :)
227 North Terrace is 13 levels, Liberty is actually 13 levels including the ground floor and penthouse level, Liberty is 12 levels, and Majectics Hotel is 9 levels.
Then there are a heap of buildings u/c in the cbd ranging from 3-11 levels.
pikey July 15th, 2003, 07:10 AM ahem....... 227 North Terrace is 14 levels my boy.....
http://www.capcity.adelaide.sa.gov.au/projects/projects_details.asp?ID=305
Now never doubt me again or I'll bitch slap and unleash the people's elbow on you.
CAN YOU SMELL, WHAT THE PIKEY, IS COOKING??
I really apologise for the Rock flashback!!
AG July 15th, 2003, 07:15 AM Yuk, that doesn't smell good at all pikey... :puke: :fart:
jacobsian July 15th, 2003, 07:27 AM Originally posted by pikey
ahem....... 227 North Terrace is 14 levels my boy.....
http://www.capcity.adelaide.sa.gov.au/projects/projects_details.asp?ID=305
Now never doubt me again or I'll bitch slap and unleash the people's elbow on you.
CAN YOU SMELL, WHAT THE PIKEY, IS COOKING??
I really apologise for the Rock flashback!!
According to that page, it's cost is.... 1.8 million.
Dodgy construction co or dodgy website with potential to have other dodgy figures such as floor count... :)
pikey July 15th, 2003, 07:46 AM Me thinks that the decimal poit is playing funny buggers.
The rest of the website is worth a look though
AG July 15th, 2003, 07:54 AM Originally posted by yob
According to that page, it's cost is.... 1.8 million.
Dodgy construction co or dodgy website with potential to have other dodgy figures such as floor count... :)
We'll soon fine out when 223 North Terrace is constructed. :D
pikey July 15th, 2003, 08:24 AM STILL, IT'S ALL GOOD!
AtD July 15th, 2003, 09:22 AM pikey: You should be telling me what's wrong here (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?postid=611374#post611374), OK? :)
pikey July 15th, 2003, 09:29 AM I got caught up in the moment, you can't blame me for that can you??? :cool:
pikey July 15th, 2003, 09:30 AM Anyhow duck, you have the first construction pic of this bitch, albeit some concrete blocks, it's still a start!
flyin_higher July 15th, 2003, 10:30 AM any new tower developments in Adelaide are welcomed..good stuff! :cool:
pikey July 28th, 2003, 12:45 AM From Saturday,
It's on it's way!!
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid71/pf465ca00cc0b1a7ed5e61a7ba717ea36/fb8e8ed0.jpg
Cheers
AtD July 28th, 2003, 07:46 AM I took one today, but had I known you had that up your sleave, I wouldn't have bothered - yours is better.
http://home.iprimus.com.au/adamtre/martins-small.jpg
AG July 28th, 2003, 09:32 AM Guys, check out the Austin Street side of the building too, they are putting up scaffolding around parts of the top.
Will July 28th, 2003, 10:25 AM Things are moving along very nicely on 223 North Terrace.
I think the tower crane will be up within a 2 to 3 months.
BTW, are they demolishing the small 3 level building on Austin Street?
AdMan July 31st, 2003, 03:00 AM hey dudes, yeah its coming along now i walk past it on the way to uni every day, i have to say they have but these huge plonks of conrete on the pedestrian strip and painted them yellow there are like ten of them they are so ugly!! they are for some sought of pagola thingy ill give ya updates as i walk past there 4 days a week:D oh yeah just thought id tell ya i started my urban and regional planning course at unis on monday and its AWSOME!!! its soo cool and interesting and the people are really open im so glad i swapped courses im going to love this course it rocks!! catchyaz.
PinkFloyd July 31st, 2003, 05:34 AM Whats with power lines in the middle of the city?!? Your state government should work to sink them all.
pikey July 31st, 2003, 06:36 AM It's happening. All of North Terrace is getting done
pikey August 18th, 2003, 05:40 AM Did any of you guys check out the awesome render in Saturdays Realestate section??? By far the best render I have seen of this project!
AG August 18th, 2003, 09:47 AM Yup, that was a great 3-D night rendering of the building.
AtD August 18th, 2003, 09:54 AM Is it the same as the one on the ~4 story billboard they've put on the side of the carpark?
jacobsian August 18th, 2003, 10:22 AM Originally posted by AtD
Is it the same as the one on the ~4 story billboard they've put on the side of the carpark?
Nope. Look at the are of the facade where the old carpark meets the tower - the edge is now bordered by white edges or something or rather.
It gives us the first look of the side though - the cream coloured car park with the diaganol openings showing the ramps down each level of the car park will be replaced by a grey wall the whole way... hmmm
pikey September 14th, 2003, 07:35 AM DA APPROVED!!! NORTH TOWER TO BE BIGGER!!!
http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com.au/council/publications/Dev_Registers/approved/aug03approvalplanning.pdf
Have a look on page 15 of this PDF, the North Tower is to be changed taking the total apartments from 94 to 111!!
Taller maybe????
pikey September 14th, 2003, 07:36 AM :D
jacobsian September 14th, 2003, 07:40 AM Pikey, "internal layout ammendments" - same size tower, smaller apartments :(
pikey September 14th, 2003, 10:24 AM Developers getting greedy maybe??? Good selling results so they'll whack more in maybe
pikey September 23rd, 2003, 08:33 AM Anyone had a captian cook down here lately??? Surely the Tower Crane cannot be too far off???
AtD September 23rd, 2003, 11:26 AM Nah nothing much seems to have happened over the last... month? There was still only one story of scaffolding on the roof on Friday.
pikey September 29th, 2003, 06:33 AM Went past just then and ther was 5 cement trucks lined up dumping their load into a pumping arm. And from my 3 second look as i was driving past, I'm sure I saw a tower crane base, a black one on the Eastwest Appartments side
Will September 29th, 2003, 10:24 AM Originally posted by pikey
Went past just then and ther was 5 cement trucks lined up dumping their load into a pumping arm. And from my 3 second look as i was driving past, I'm sure I saw a tower crane base, a black one on the Eastwest Appartments side
I think you are right, Austin Street would be the most favourable location for a tower crane.
When I went past the site on Saturday night, I did notice that Austin Street has been practically closed to traffic.
AtD September 29th, 2003, 12:29 PM Said concrete pumping arm, with the Eastwest Apartments site next to it.
http://www.urbanmelbourne.com/adelaide/MiscDates/picture%20012_std.jpg
pikey September 29th, 2003, 01:19 PM I'm surprised that t is this far into construction and no crane, even though I am sure I saw the base there today.
I did hear though that there is a crane shortage in SA. Most of Ours have gone to Victoria, first our fucken GP and NOW out cranes!!! Bastatds! I mean it's not like they have anything under construction there at the moment? ;)
jacobsian October 2nd, 2003, 10:55 AM I braved my irrational fear of heights for this photo boys :p
http://www.netspace.net.au/~smicik/martintowers031003a.JPG
pikey October 2nd, 2003, 12:34 PM Phuk Yob!! Great photo mate!! You should really challenge your fear more often! How are you gonna go if we manage to get on the roof of Santos at one of the meets??!!
Which building did you take this happy snap from??
Could you make out a crane base or core framing at all?? I just can't make out much there at the moment. Top effort all the same though!!
jacobsian October 2nd, 2003, 12:38 PM Originally posted by pikey
Phuk Yob!! Great photo mate!! You should really challenge your fear more often! How are you gonna go if we manage to get on the roof of Santos at one of the meets??!!
Which building did you take this happy snap from??
Could you make out a crane base or core framing at all?? I just can't make out much there at the moment. Top effort all the same though!!
It's from within one of the external glass elevators on the renaissance building in the mall, level 7. I got a nice pic down rundle st aswell, but I can't really start a thread for one pic. Rest assured if we went up Santos i'd piss my pants then faint.
That ugly brown thing on the left edge of the photo I think is where the original core ends, so they'll prolly build onto that? I'm no engineer tho...
AG October 2nd, 2003, 12:59 PM I also passed the buildings through the arcade today. They've really started pumping away to get the foundations done. There was a truck loading concrete into the pumping machine as I passed.
pikey October 2nd, 2003, 01:01 PM My mum had a bit of a fear of heights too, but she jumped out of a plane in New Zealand today, and she loved it!!!
Back to the topic...
Now we know where to get our construction shots for both of these babys! Good find man!
AG October 2nd, 2003, 01:03 PM Originally posted by pikey
Now we know where to get our construction shots for both of these babys! Good find man!
Might get some strange stares mate... :D
pikey October 2nd, 2003, 01:07 PM Don't worry about stares AG!! When I was taking some shots of the Commonwealth Law Courts from Carrington St, I got a visit from the Cops later in the arvo. Since I took the shot from my car, as it was pissing down, they thought I was some kind of info guy for terrorists, scoping the place out!! They made me show them the photos and everything. Once the knew about it all and my geeky obsession with scrapers, they were cool.
I quietly shit myself in the meantime though!!
pikey October 14th, 2003, 12:42 AM Still more concrete trucks, and no sign of a crane
pikey October 23rd, 2003, 05:50 AM Is it just me or is this the slowest, most boring construction site in the city??? Seriously are they building this thing one concrete bag at a time, WTF is going on here???
jacobsian December 9th, 2003, 11:52 AM There was another bag of concrete added today, I momentarily sustained an erection at the sight of it.
AG December 9th, 2003, 12:31 PM Originally posted by yob
There was another bag of concrete added today, I momentarily sustained an erection at the sight of it.
You were that excited?!!! Just for one bag of concrete? :eek2:
AtD December 9th, 2003, 12:52 PM Originally posted by yob
There was another bag of concrete added today, I momentarily sustained an erection at the sight of it.
Now come on, this isn't the Eureka thread.
pikey December 9th, 2003, 10:24 PM A new piece of scaffolding has been added - the height of this under construction tower has now effectively doubled.
Will December 13th, 2003, 03:23 AM I went past North Terrace yesterday and I was really dissapointed to see that absolutely nothing has changed on this construction site since August of this year.
I wonder if the developers went broke?
jacobsian December 13th, 2003, 03:28 AM Originally posted by Will
I went past North Terrace yesterday and I was really dissapointed to see that absolutely nothing has changed on this construction site since August of this year.
I wonder if the developers went broke?
Will - check out the above construction pics. What they ahve been doing is filling that grid like foundation with concrete before they can start rising the floors. Last time I looked from the renaissance center all of these squares were now complete, so we can actually expect to start seeing rises soon!
Will December 13th, 2003, 03:38 AM Originally posted by yob
Will - check out the above construction pics. What they ahve been doing is filling that grid like foundation with concrete before they can start rising the floors. Last time I looked from the renaissance center all of these squares were now complete, so we can actually expect to start seeing rises soon!
Thank God!
AG December 17th, 2003, 03:53 AM Someone wake me up when this thing finally gets off the ground... I mean the carpark. Other projects will probably start and finish before this one gets further than it's foundations! :moods:
:goodnight
jacobsian December 17th, 2003, 11:09 AM I can't wait for eureka-itis to strike this thread.
When we get our first floor rise, everyone will say "OMG it's RACING ALONG!!!!!!!"
Will February 4th, 2004, 09:46 AM It's February 2004, and nothing significant has happened since August of last year.
Maybe the status of this project should be changed to 'on-hold' on SS.com?
jacobsian February 4th, 2004, 10:18 AM Originally posted by Will
It's February 2004, and nothing significant has happened since August of last year.
Maybe the status of this project should be changed to 'on-hold' on SS.com?
Have you been to the site recently? It has had a semi floor rise, with a new "roof" constructed on the old top floor. It's nothing bt rising from now on, and I saw cement trucks at the site today.
Adder-Laid February 4th, 2004, 10:42 AM I think the initial re-inforcing of the original building stage was almost as big as the actual building phase... so yeah, I'd expect it to rise quite quickly from here :)
Will February 7th, 2004, 04:35 AM Originally posted by yob
Have you been to the site recently? It has had a semi floor rise, with a new "roof" constructed on the old top floor. It's nothing bt rising from now on, and I saw cement trucks at the site today.
Yes I went to the site a few days ago, but it still looks the same to me...
Maybe next time I'll take more notice of the small changes that have occured.
pikey February 8th, 2004, 10:17 PM There was a crane taking up what looked like tower crane pieces to the roof on Saturday. May be something else, but from what I saw quickly, It looks as if crane is not far away!
pikey February 11th, 2004, 02:18 AM Heaps of the scaffolding has gone, you can see what kind of shape the front of this tower is going to take. I guess it's the first floor plate???
jacobsian April 20th, 2004, 04:29 AM Would this building just hurry the fuck up? Seriously.
pikey April 20th, 2004, 07:36 AM I thought it had taken it in the ass and folded, until I saw a crane LAST saturday lifting more shit up. So i guess it's still going ahead?
AtD April 20th, 2004, 09:58 AM I thought it had taken it in the ass and folded, until I saw a crane LAST saturday lifting more shit up. So i guess it's still going ahead?
Makes me wonder why they dont use the crane for Eastwest.
pikey May 11th, 2004, 11:50 PM As you can see more work has gone on here since Yobs last shot. You can also see casting marks and a square section where the tower crane should appear, on the right hand side, very close to the east west crane...
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/53465332.jpg
So thinks are happening, albeit so fucking slooooooowly.
Aussie Steve May 14th, 2004, 05:40 AM This is a great project. I look forward to seeing it completed the next time i'm in Adelaide.
AG May 15th, 2004, 02:45 AM Well it looks like the new foundation is just about complete. By the time they start constructing the first floor, 227 North Terrace next door will almost be topped out. :|
Adelarch May 15th, 2004, 04:30 AM My guess on the reason it's been so excruciatingly slow is that they've needed to carry out a whole lot of structural work on the existing building so that it can take the weight of the new floors. Anyway, I'm really looking forward to seeing this one take shape - hoping it really does look something like this
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid116/p0b2fde520ad7061cd17ca57f5c94f052/f8abaf3b.jpg
AtD June 9th, 2004, 11:44 AM Activity! Site offices have been placed on the roof of the carpark and there was a mobile crane up there today as well. Took some pics, will upload when I have more time.
AtD June 12th, 2004, 06:31 PM WE HAVE A CRANE!
The crane tower was put up today, but the 'head' isn't up yet.
jacobsian June 13th, 2004, 01:53 AM http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid49/pa3cbd3c4a0b0608fc9878b4f915774c0/fcb11848.jpg
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid116/p0b2fde520ad7061cd17ca57f5c94f052/f8abaf3b.jpg
Makes you wonder what the final design will look like. I prefer the original, the second seems to have white coloured borders on the top of the facade, which just kinda rub me the wrong kinda way. It spoils the continuity going up the structure (whatever that means). Anyways, i'm off to the library, might get a shot from the renaissance centre of our new tower crane thingy.
pikey June 13th, 2004, 02:58 AM Here we go bitches, some crane tower action. Looks like a little bit of Melbourne coming to Adelaide!!!
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/56445580.jpg
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/56445588.jpg
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/56445632.jpg
Has anyone seen a tower crane mounting like this??
jacobsian June 13th, 2004, 07:52 AM Man, I was at the renaissance centre at about 1:30 and the both the elevators were busted? What's up with that :D Top pics pikester.
AG June 13th, 2004, 08:32 AM Yob, the elevators at the Renaissance Centre don't operate on Sundays cause the stuff above Toys 'R' Us is shut.
AtD June 20th, 2004, 10:51 AM The crane's now up. Went past at 5.00ish and they were fixing the arm - its bloody massive. They could use the same crane for Eastwest if they really wanted.
pikey June 20th, 2004, 11:18 PM Cool, gotta get a shot ASAP!
pikey June 29th, 2004, 11:30 PM Okay Pikey, here you go man!!!! :runaway:
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/58377753.jpg
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/58377734.jpg
jacobsian July 14th, 2004, 06:16 AM Has anyone seen this recently? A couple of weeks I walked past, and it looked to me that a partial floor rise was in process towards the Rundle street end, but it was only a quick look...
pikey July 14th, 2004, 06:35 AM Yeah I got pics, will upload em tommorow
pikey July 15th, 2004, 11:27 PM as promised Mr Yob
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/60131109.jpg
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/60131097.jpg
Nice little crane soft porn shot
http://pic10.picturetrail.com:80/VOL343/2004633/3879099/60131085.jpg
:cheers:
jacobsian July 22nd, 2004, 08:56 AM Just had a thought - how are they going to get elevators in this thing?
I was thinking they could simply extend the lift shaft already present, but that'll only work for the south tower. How will people get up into the 8 storey north tower?
Adder-Laid July 22nd, 2004, 12:56 PM Good point :P
They might possibly have seperate lifts planned for this which we can't see yet?
AtD July 22nd, 2004, 01:39 PM http://urbanmelbourne.com/adelaide/2004-07-22/picture%20090_std.jpg
http://urbanmelbourne.com/adelaide/2004-07-22/picture%20093_std.jpg
http://urbanmelbourne.com/adelaide/2004-07-22/picture%20100_std.jpg
Favco750 August 2nd, 2004, 03:11 PM Pikey, I can't find the thread, but there is another green crane coming your way to sit on that single green tower on a baulderstones job, the crane is a M380D, try and get some pictures of the serial number which will be on the round bit at the top of the towers ( the pedestal)
Thanks mate.
pikey August 2nd, 2004, 11:31 PM Hey Fav, I'm pretty sure that thread was the official cranes thread. Is a M380D simular to the crane shown above?
Shuzstar August 3rd, 2004, 11:49 AM nice pics, should be good
Favco750 August 4th, 2004, 01:51 PM looks similar pikey, but has fixed counterweights right up the back, it's a lot more modern.
AG September 24th, 2004, 10:32 AM Has anything happened on this building for ages? :?
AtD September 24th, 2004, 03:00 PM Not since that last photo
jacobsian September 26th, 2004, 07:42 PM One more level of the steel frame is in place on the south side. I have a photo of that from a couple of weeks ago, but well... i'm taking after this construction site, and basically can't be stuffed uploading :)
I remember joking that Eastwest would overtake this building. Well, Eastwest has topped out and the tower crane is gone... heh.
jacobsian October 20th, 2004, 09:05 AM 18 months of construction ,and this is what they have to show for it so far :)
http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt20oct.jpg
Pants October 20th, 2004, 10:31 AM Legal disputes mate.
jacobsian October 20th, 2004, 10:53 AM Legal disputes?
Pants October 21st, 2004, 01:30 AM Legal disputes?
Holding up construction.
Adder-Laid October 21st, 2004, 06:43 PM I think he was requesting more detail of what the legal disputes might entail...
Pants October 22nd, 2004, 01:37 AM I think he was requesting more detail of what the legal disputes might entail...
Sorry guys, not trying to be a smart arse, but I can't say much more than that.
It does seem to be back on track though.
Derek October 26th, 2004, 11:58 AM Hi, I work for Buchan Lee, the agents for this project. The hold up in construction was not due to any legal dispute, but was due to a problem with obtaining the title to the property. For sales information visit www.buchanlee.com.au.
Pants October 26th, 2004, 11:42 PM Hi, I work for Buchan Lee, the agents for this project. The hold up in construction was not due to any legal dispute, but was due to a problem with obtaining the title to the property. For sales information visit www.buchanlee.com.au.
Sorry to disagree with you mate, but I know first hand that there were legal issues involved and that certain works were stopped because of them. Perhaps these were in the background of problems obtaining the title, meaning that delays would have been caused regardless, but either way, it's back on track now, which is great.
Cheers.
pikey October 27th, 2004, 12:08 AM Cool pics
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223nightaerial.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223night1.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223nightinside.jpg
should be cool when it gets finished!
mic October 27th, 2004, 03:29 AM fantastic complex! really like the style and image adelaide is going for. i still dont understand why they just dont build a nice stylish building taller than santos. it makes the city look old and slightly out dated, by having taller buildings i beleive a city looks much more powerful and dominant.
is there a height restriction in the cbd due to the airport or is it the councils idea?
adelaide needs to make the cbd like a central park for the south, it would look stunning and very different to other australian cities- but thats my 2 cents!
Shuzstar October 27th, 2004, 08:56 AM Both.
The airport is only about 10/15 miuntes drive from the city which is rougly 3-4 km away. If the flights go directly over North Adelaide from about 1km above it, the airports commision have a ruling that no development within a range of 900m either way up or down (doesn't matter up anyway) can be built. So, North Adelaide can ony have about 100m MAXIMUM, but the council likes it at about 30m MAX. Once again, same goes for the CBD if the flight path is 900m either way across (left, right, forward, backward) then no development can go beyond 100m. However, the council and airport have allowed 115m MAXIMUM.
Santos House is NOT meant to be 135m, its meant to be 115m. but if we develop south of the 'BIG' part of the CBD, eg: the Optus Building on South Tce, then we can hopefully see something at least 200m maximum, but then again the height is stopped because of aeroplanes and councils, and blah.
We have the exact same problem as Hong Kong, the airports too close to the city, and yet they BREACH the rules by 200m. And the building investors cant be sued cos theyre portetced, cos ones somethings up, its up. Unless something happened like 9/11.
So we have a shitty council, bad planning from the 50's/60's and no-where else to start a new cbd within a central location of the city, UNLESS.....
The New CBD took over the area of the airport and the main airport gets shifted back to Parafield and extened into the RAAF Base, cos theyre moving to Edinburgh anyway.... then we'd have city with TWO skylines, how cool's that.
Shuzstar October 27th, 2004, 08:57 AM but i doubt that would happen anyway....
AG October 27th, 2004, 09:12 AM You have no idea what you are talking about Shuz.
The height restrictions were brought into place during the early 90s. The State Bank Building as it was named back then was constructed in the late 1980s during the commercial boom at that time. The height limit for most of the city has nothing to do with the flight paths.
The airport at Hong Kong is much further out that you think. The old Kai Tak Airport was IN the city on the Kowloon side until they closed it for Chep Lok Airport which is some 15-20km west of Kowloon on Lan Tau Island. Even the old airport was fine with height restrictions. The Hong Kong Island side was fine because the runways were facing towards the areas east of Central, and west from Kowloon.
The airport cannot be shifted to Parafield because the land space is too small and would cause protest amongst the people in the surrounding areas of Mawson Lakes and Para Hills.
AtD October 27th, 2004, 09:46 AM There is a CASA hight restriction over Adelaide, but it's far greater than the ACC's fuzzy-limits (which the state government can abolish or ignore).
No High limits != skyscrapers.
Shuzstar October 27th, 2004, 12:37 PM Edit by ATD:
This post was the straw that broke the camel's back. Cheers to the powers that be.
Now let's keep it on topic. :)
Derek November 9th, 2004, 11:59 AM The Buchan Lee website has been updated with information about the structural design of 223 North Terrace. I'm sure this will be of interest ... www.buchanlee.com.au
jacobsian November 9th, 2004, 12:23 PM Thanks for that update Derek. Is it possible that the site could host some larger, more detailed renders of the building?
Adelarch November 10th, 2004, 06:06 AM Thanks Derek, interesting info. Slightly ironic isn't it that the special building technology was meant to speed up the program
jacobsian November 10th, 2004, 11:08 AM I wasn't going to mention that :)
I think I saw the first steel structure in place for the north tower today. If so, well, it's about bloody time :D
jacobsian November 22nd, 2004, 09:54 AM http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt22nov.jpg
jacobsian November 26th, 2004, 09:23 AM http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt26nov.jpg
http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt26nov2.jpg
http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt26nov3.jpg
AG November 26th, 2004, 10:26 AM Well it looks like the southern half has nearly reached full height. Wish they'd get on with the higher northern part though. Nice angles there yob, North Terrace looks great in those images.
jacobsian November 26th, 2004, 10:33 AM The south tower is 5 levels above the concrete roof, so there's still a bit more to go on the steel structure.
*edit* or is there? Man, i've given up on trying to figure out this building without a comprehensive render of the whole thing. We've heard 16 levels for the north tower, 15 levels, and from my count it looks to be 14 levels. No idea.
jacobsian December 15th, 2004, 04:50 AM http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt25december2004.jpg
Adder-Laid December 15th, 2004, 12:12 PM moving at such a frenetic pace, i must say...
JAKJ December 15th, 2004, 04:30 PM I wish they could build this fast in shanghai.....ahem
What is taking them so long?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
jacobsian December 17th, 2004, 07:16 PM http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt18december.jpg
Will December 24th, 2004, 04:15 AM I'm happy - at least now I can see some progress...
Al December 24th, 2004, 05:01 AM I wish they could build this fast in shanghai.....ahem
What is taking them so long?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I reckon! Hate to be an investor waiting to make money off this one. Nearly two years and it's just starting to move!
redstar December 24th, 2004, 07:11 AM what is this meant to be?
AG January 24th, 2005, 09:22 AM This is an apartment building on top of an existing car park.
Currently the northern side is beginning to take off. Only a few more floors on the northern side to go.
Pants March 14th, 2005, 06:08 AM Coming along slowly:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/michaelchristhomas/NthTce.jpg
redstar March 14th, 2005, 09:18 AM everthing here is slow, how about we change our number plates to
South Australia: The State Of Sloths
AG March 14th, 2005, 10:17 AM Ahaha ahaha... oh. :hahano:
Adelarch March 14th, 2005, 10:19 AM wow, being treated to daily pics - thanks Pants :okay:
yes this one still seems very slow, in spite of the legal issues supposedly having been resolved.
On the topic of North Tce generally, I was glad to read in today's Advertiser that the 2nd phase of the streetscape upgrade has gotten the go ahead.
Pants March 14th, 2005, 12:08 PM wow, being treated to daily pics - thanks Pants :okay:
yes this one still seems very slow, in spite of the legal issues supposedly having been resolved.
On the topic of North Tce generally, I was glad to read in today's Advertiser that the 2nd phase of the streetscape upgrade has gotten the go ahead.
Yeah, I just found my digi cam after almost giving up on it and buying a new one and thought I might take a few pics for you guys.
I pass most of the major development sites a few times a week, so I'll keep the pics coming until I get lazy.
I was also glad to hear about Nth Tce. I love what they've done with it. The way they've opened it up so that the landmark buildings are more prominent is amazing. It doesn't seem like they've done much, but it's made a huge difference.
I hope an announcement for King William Street to Kintore Avenue isn't that far away. I was actually thinking while taking this pic (all while driving at the same time - multiskilled) about how far down they'd ideally go. I guess they don't need to go any further than the Morphett Street Bridge, but I'll be happy with whatever they do for now.
kota16 March 15th, 2005, 06:46 AM My neighbour who is well travelled in Europe and Asia told me yesterday that the city of Adelaide looks and reminds her of a cemetery. So much grey and black amd horrible landscaping like in Rundle Mall and Victoria Square.So here on North Tce we have black lightpoles again, when they could have been a nice pastel green or even a sandstone colour. As for that statue on the footpath of Edward 7th, if it had been moved 20 metres away from spoiling the view of the Heritage Building that houses the Bradman Collection, and not on the footpath, it would have been worth the effort. So much for the council morons who have no idea of beautification.
Adelarch March 15th, 2005, 10:18 AM kota I'm sorry to hear you have a dim view of the upgrade. I would have said the precise colour of the lightpoles and position of one statue are pretty minor issues in relation to the overall picture - improved pedestrian flows, greater visual pemeability to heritage facades, higher quality of landscape finishes, improved nightime lighting, undergrounded powerlines etc. Council were not responsible for the upgrade although they had a small say in it - State government had a larger say. The design itself was undertaken by professional landscape architects, not council (you're right, Council wouldn't know what they were doing). Personally I agree most of Adelaide's public domain spaces are pretty ordinary, but in my mind this rates as a big exception when you look at the overall objectives of the upgrade, regardless of the precise colours they've chosen.
AtD March 15th, 2005, 11:07 AM North Terrace is now, IMO, the best public space in Adelaide. Although I do agree they could have done more with the Edward VII statue. Perhaps move it back and put gardens around it. It looks like it was just dropped there randomly.
kota16 March 15th, 2005, 02:15 PM There have been numerous letters to the Advertiser over the years, asking for that statue to be moved off the footpath. I did go along when consulting some years back and suggested the London Plain or Chinese Maple trees which one finds on St Kilda Rd. I like the light posts, I am merely saying that I agree with my neighbour about the colour of black, as being akin to a cemetery.
Will March 17th, 2005, 08:59 AM I really like the improvements they've made to North Terrace, but I really hate the fact that they've taken 2 years to do something which would have taken 6 months in another capital city.
Adelarch March 17th, 2005, 03:44 PM I really like the improvements they've made to North Terrace, but I really hate the fact that they've taken 2 years to do something which would have taken 6 months in another capital city.
As someone closely involved in streetscape upgrades in Sydney, I can inform you that it usually takes a long time to get things done here as well!
No offence, but part of Adelaide's problem is the simple fact that Adelaidean's tend to think that everywhere else is so much better and more efficient etc - believe me, it's not always true
AtD March 23rd, 2005, 04:07 PM http://photoadelaide.com/JunkPile/23-03-2005/picture%20004_std.jpg
AdelaideSkytraveller March 24th, 2005, 02:08 AM As someone closely involved in streetscape upgrades in Sydney, I can inform you that it usually takes a long time to get things done here as well!
No offence, but part of Adelaide's problem is the simple fact that Adelaidean's tend to think that everywhere else is so much better and more efficient etc - believe me, it's not always true
Your totally right, its just that other places have a lot more development and hence cranes happening at the same time, so you tend not to dwell to long
on a specific development a lot as you would here in Adelaide.
jacobsian April 6th, 2005, 08:19 AM http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/223nt6april.jpg
Adelarch April 6th, 2005, 12:37 PM nice shot there jacobsian ;)
this ones finally beginning to develop some form to it. Personally I like the extra scale and presence it's starting to add to North Tce here
AtD April 11th, 2005, 11:25 AM Slow progress.
http://www.photoadelaide.com/JunkPile/11-Apr-05/picture%20028_std.jpg
Howie April 13th, 2005, 01:52 AM very slow progress, anyone has any clue on when this is likely to be completed?
I'd hate to imagine how the investors would be feeling being out of pocket for so damn long now.
Derek April 15th, 2005, 04:13 PM Hi all,
The Buchan Lee website has been updated with floor plans of the remaining apartments for sale. www.buchanlee.com.au
Giorgio April 16th, 2005, 03:20 AM Is there a render?
Pants April 16th, 2005, 03:45 AM Did you follow the link?
Will April 18th, 2005, 08:52 AM I have a feeling this building will be taller than what we expected.
From the latest photos it appears that only two floors have been built, and I recall that this building will have 8 floors. My point is that at 2 levels it's already as tall as Eastwest, therefore I believe that with an extra 6 levels to go it will exceed the 45m height it's listed on SS.com.
Maybe 50m...
Pants May 8th, 2005, 11:27 PM From yesterday with a few pics of EastWest Apartments thrown in:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/michaelchristhomas/8-5-05010.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/michaelchristhomas/8-5-05012.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/michaelchristhomas/8-5-05011.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/michaelchristhomas/8-5-05013.jpg
jacobsian July 4th, 2005, 09:39 AM Geez I never noticed your update in this thread until now. Top shots! Maybe PM Cull and get him to add the second last shot to SS.com.
http://smicik.customer.netspace.net.au/july4223nt.jpg
tayser July 4th, 2005, 03:19 PM turned out very nice, only thing I remember of this thing back in November was walking over soggy carpet on the North Tce footpath :lol:
Derek October 15th, 2005, 04:10 AM Got some pics from inside the actual construction site. Apologies for the mobile phone quality, but they were taken on a mobile phone ...
Looking at the South Tower from the North Tower:
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/jmconstruction10.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/jmconstruction11.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/jmconstruction12.jpg
Anyone read yesterday's Advertiser, page 13?
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/jm_pool_news.jpg
www.buchanlee.com.au
Muse October 15th, 2005, 04:35 AM Great stuff Derek! Pics are fine :okay:
So now Adelaide can now boast the cinema complex with the most screens in the world AND the world's largest one-piece fibreglass swimming pool.
bardoc October 17th, 2005, 07:09 AM Hmm, looks promising. Rumour has it that one apartment has been finished, interior photos in the pipeline...
TooFar October 18th, 2005, 11:49 PM Great stuff Derek! Pics are fine :okay:
So now Adelaide can now boast the cinema complex with the most screens in the world AND the world's largest one-piece fibreglass swimming pool.
And the worlds first indoor ski hill...
Will October 20th, 2005, 10:00 AM Derek thank you for your contribution. Could you enlighten us as to how tall the building will be? Emporis has it listed as 45m? however I suspect this is in-correct.
redstar November 2nd, 2005, 09:11 AM another brilliant addition to the north terrace skyline or streetscape. whichever you prefer to think of it as.
UrbanSG November 20th, 2005, 01:13 AM Taken today. Having a nice impact on this part of the Adelaide skyline now.
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/UrbanSG/Nov-4.jpg
Mants November 20th, 2005, 01:26 AM it is starting to look nice... lol, i realli like the sails on adelaide oval
aceman November 20th, 2005, 03:23 AM Adelaide oval : The most picturesque cricket ground in the world!!!!!!
Giorgio November 20th, 2005, 04:18 AM i didnt realise how far east it was. Why is it going so slow? maybe because theres a building already standing beneath it?
redstar November 20th, 2005, 05:34 AM yeah, it takes longer 2 build on another structure because u have to connect the twoi together which is frustrating work. just like adding another floor to ur home really - takes longer 2 do than it would to build a new house altogther.
Mants November 20th, 2005, 07:45 AM it'll be worth it, hopefully
aceman November 21st, 2005, 09:34 AM I had a look along North Terrace yesterday in the basking sunshine and I think its simply stunning and wait until the new trees that have been planted mature. The architecture is devine and we south aussies should be proud of this area.
JAKJ November 21st, 2005, 10:50 AM Pity they destroyed what would have been one of north terraces signature building, the exhibition centre, we should all give our parents a good kick in the arse for that one!
http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/archives/images/gallery/pic_postcard1.jpg
Mants November 21st, 2005, 10:54 AM why was it demolished?
JAKJ November 21st, 2005, 12:40 PM why was it demolished?
To bulid the ugly ligertwood and napier adelaide uni buildings in the late 60's. :(
Giorgio November 22nd, 2005, 08:26 AM So basically Adelaide has gone from one extreme to the other? First we approve the ruthless destruction of histoical buildings as such and now we don't even touch a 100 year old house? When will we get it right?
AG November 22nd, 2005, 08:45 AM So basically Adelaide has gone from one extreme to the other? First we approve the ruthless destruction of histoical buildings as such and now we don't even touch a 100 year old house? When will we get it right?
It's not surprising seeing that hundreds of old buildings were torn down in the 1960s and 1970s. Some of them came close to being torn down, but were heritage listed and spared. One of those was Edmund Wright House at the northern end of King William Street. Some of it's neighbours weren't so lucky.
AtD November 22nd, 2005, 02:44 PM To bulid the ugly ligertwood and napier adelaide uni buildings in the late 60's. :(
And a car park! Makes it all worth while...
Rev November 23rd, 2005, 08:01 AM Hmm. Going down King Willim st, heading into town, it really stands out, and it isnt even compeleted.
Giorgio December 10th, 2005, 10:10 AM Should be a good one this one. I havnt seen any renders yet on this thread. Heres a few :
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223night1.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223nightinside.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223nightaerial.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223sketch.jpg
It will have 111 Apartments in 2 towers. It will be 7 storeys high (above the david jones car park). According to the developers, it should have a fast erection time. i totally disagree.
Will December 16th, 2005, 08:31 AM It's not surprising seeing that hundreds of old buildings were torn down in the 1960s and 1970s. Some of them came close to being torn down, but were heritage listed and spared. One of those was Edmund Wright House at the northern end of King William Street. Some of it's neighbours weren't so lucky.
When you compare Adelaide's situation with the other large capital cities, I can confidently say that we preserved our heritgae better than most. And whilst we did lose some great treasures, I have been looking at old photos in the State Library and I have to say that the majority of buildings demolished did not have much architectural merit.
aussie2000 December 16th, 2005, 09:34 AM This building is really taking its time, better be good :)
redstar December 16th, 2005, 11:00 AM it can be seen quite well when driving up the hill from the west to east on nth terrace near the casino.
the building really has a impact on that end of the city.
aussie2000 December 16th, 2005, 11:59 AM is that the same as the road that you go along when you go past the zoo, because it looks like a really big major building, heading to the city by that road
Rev December 16th, 2005, 12:38 PM You mean Frome Rd?
aussie2000 December 16th, 2005, 12:39 PM yes
Giorgio December 16th, 2005, 04:24 PM This is the tower (midrise) to be built along with it?
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/223nightaerial.jpg
redstar December 17th, 2005, 01:50 AM no. thats the actual tower(s). just a nightime rendering.
Giorgio December 17th, 2005, 06:02 AM So the second tower is behind?
redstar December 17th, 2005, 06:41 AM No. The photo shows 1 main tower (North Tower - facing Nth Terrace) and separating the two by a plaza area is the South Tower. Its still on the same building atop the carpark.
Rev December 17th, 2005, 09:23 AM Yes.
The north tower is facing North Tce, then there is a gap(not sure whats in the middle), then the south tower.
Mants December 17th, 2005, 10:15 AM that massive fibreglass swimming pool?
Rev December 17th, 2005, 11:58 AM Yea might be part of the space in between the two.
Im not sure, but I am sure that someone else does know. :)
Giorgio December 21st, 2005, 02:24 PM Ok well contacted the developer today. Says that the building will hopefully be finished by mid 2006. He couldnt confirm the height for me. Also asked him if he has anymore projects in the pipeline. Theres nothing solid yet but there scouting for opportunities. In the mean time im going to try contact the Architect to find out more.
Goodnight. :)
Derek December 22nd, 2005, 04:08 AM Hi all,
Please note that the Buchan Lee website has been updated with details of the completed apartment in the South Tower. If you compare the finished product with the intial renders (not sure if anyone has these, if not I will put them up when I get time), you will find that the renders were remarkably accurate! Hopefully I will get some time to post more photos soon. www buchanlee.com.au
Rev December 22nd, 2005, 04:11 AM 223 North TerraceCompleted Apartment in South Building
An apartment has been fast tracked by the developers to display the some of the final interior finishes specified by the project's architects. The theme for this apartment is 'RAW'. The other themes available for interior finishes are 'SHARP' and 'CALM'.
Yes, do post some pictures please if you are able to. Would be interested to see it..
Will December 23rd, 2005, 09:32 AM Ok well contacted the developer today. Says that the building will hopefully be finished by mid 2006. He couldnt confirm the height for me. Also asked him if he has anymore projects in the pipeline. Theres nothing solid yet but there scouting for opportunities. In the mean time im going to try contact the Architect to find out more.
Goodnight. :)
If you could get the actual height of the building I would really appreaciate it, as the height listed on emporis is a guess.
redstar December 23rd, 2005, 02:43 PM well it looks <50m.
Giorgio December 24th, 2005, 07:06 AM If you could get the actual height of the building I would really appreaciate it, as the height listed on emporis is a guess.
Im trying but for some reason I cant get a straight answer. No one seems to be sure about it. I keep getting redirected between people. Ill come up with it soon.
CULWULLA December 24th, 2005, 07:24 AM i remember getting a height of 45m/150ft? 3m for LMR.=48m.
Giorgio December 24th, 2005, 02:54 PM Sounds bout right. Most of North Tce. Buildins are now hovering at around 50-55m Tall. This makes it look great.
Will December 29th, 2005, 08:19 AM i remember getting a height of 45m/150ft? 3m for LMR.=48m.
Yes that does sound about right. I questioned the height of this building because when you compare it with the Eastwest apartment building next door which is 38m, this one looks a lot taller. The height limit for that section of North tERRACE is 49.5m, so it could maybe that height as-well.
UrbanSG February 2nd, 2006, 05:11 AM A pic from today:
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/UrbanSG/Feb5-2.jpg
Mants February 2nd, 2006, 09:07 AM i recently was flying over adelaide from the north-east, over north adelaide, and martin towers do stand out on the north tce skyline
bardoc February 5th, 2006, 10:35 AM Info on the building on builder Hindmarsh website.
Go to:
http://www.hindmarshgroup.com/construction/portfolio_sa.htm
bardoc February 7th, 2006, 08:41 AM This shot taken of South Tower from the south.
http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/9417/photo0104060029wm.jpg
Rev February 7th, 2006, 08:52 AM Bardoc you didnt link to that image properly.
put the full URL of the image in place of 7-02-06
bardoc February 10th, 2006, 05:39 AM Different aspects
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/6471/littlelaneaspect0ah.jpg
bardoc February 10th, 2006, 05:44 AM I realise resolution quality not very good.
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/4468/penanglaneaspect5ah.jpg
Giorgio February 10th, 2006, 08:07 AM Was it recently named Martin Towers?
Rev February 10th, 2006, 08:12 AM Dont think so.
Every add for it in the paper, goes by the name Two Twenty Three...
AtD February 10th, 2006, 11:06 AM It was originally called Martins towers.
Will February 16th, 2006, 02:04 AM ']Was it recently named Martin Towers?
This project was originally proposed back in 2000, and the original look of the building was very different from the current design. If I can find a photo of the building I'll post it.
The name was changed to 223 North Terrace to capitalize on the North Terrace location of the building.
Giorgio April 7th, 2006, 01:26 PM Bump.
This is suppose to be complete this month.
I havnt looked at it for a while, does anyone know if it looks almost complete?
AtD April 7th, 2006, 04:11 PM Underneath the green covers, you can see its facade has taken shape. You can also glimpse it from the Mall. I hope they clean up the car park facade, it looks rather shabby.
Crane's still up so I can't see it being finished this month.
Giorgio April 7th, 2006, 04:17 PM I was thinking the same thing, the carpark facade better be cleaned.
When complete this might looks really nice, kinda like Air Apartments.
bardoc April 12th, 2006, 02:01 AM It's no surprise the building looks similar to Air Apartments - the architect company Tectus designed both.
Derek April 17th, 2006, 11:32 AM Hey Bardoc, nice info. I know you like correct spelling - Tectvs is has a 'v' even though it is pronounced like a 'u', a bit like 'Bvlgari' ...
Some shots from the construction level (a bit dated now) and a panoramic 'photostitched' North view.
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/JMconstructionA1.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/JMconstructionA2.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/JMconstructionA3.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/JMconstructionA4.jpg
http://www.buchanlee.com.au/gfx/bar/JMconstructionA5.jpg
bardoc April 17th, 2006, 01:10 PM Great shots Derek. Yes I realised it was Tectvs after searching for their website (I think a big reason why it's spelt that way is because there is a big architect firm in London already called Tectus).
|
|