View Full Version : New Urbanism in suburbs


gych
July 25th, 2005, 06:58 AM
This is IMO the latest danger to modern cities. It is about recreating urban cities in suburbs!!! Granted, its better than sprawl but still, it competes with the city. And they quote so many idiots in this article talking about they like this development because it is "urban" and they can "walk everywhere."

What they should really say is, "the city of Louisville has great urban neighborhoods where you can walk to all shopping, etc, but we do not like them because they are diverse and the houses are historic." These are people who like old school architecture but dont want to take a chance at living next to a minority or heaven forbid a gay! So they build an "old school" house in the burbs and call it urban living. Bah-humbug (and heres the article)

Development transplants urban style to suburbs
Project aims to reflect older Louisville neighborhoods

By Chris Otts
cotts@courier-journal.com
The Courier-Journal



It's still a year away, but Cissy Walker, 53, is eagerly awaiting her "dream day."

She would start the day working from the basement of her new $379,000 Federal-style home, helping her husband, a real-estate title abstractor.

Then she would take her grandsons for a walk to a nearby park, stroll to the market to pick up something fresh to cook for dinner and have a front-porch conversation with her neighbors before heading inside.

One part of her dream already is in place: the house. It will be at least a year before parks, restaurants and shops spring up around it. But Walker says it will be worth the wait.

She and her husband, Scott, 49, are among the first residents of Norton Commons, a 600-acre "traditional town" development in eastern Jefferson County that promises the look and feel of an urban Louisville neighborhood in the suburbs.

"I think we're the antithesis of suburbanism, from the architecture on," said David Tomes of Traditional Town LLC, a group of local developers building Norton Commons.

Seven years in the making, Norton Commons is an attempt to build a pedestrian-friendly town with an urban atmosphere -- with a mix of houses, apartments and townhouses, pools, parks, playgrounds, restaurants, shops and a school all within a few minutes' walk.

It's just beginning to take shape, with work started on about 50 houses and only a handful of residents.

It will take about 12 years, said Charles Osborn III, another of the project's developers.

Builders are about to break ground on retail space in the village center with the hopes that markets, coffeehouses and restaurants will open next summer, he said.

Norton Commons -- one of more than 700 "New Urban" communities built or planned around the country -- was designed by architect Andres Duany, who in 1981 helped create Seaside, Fla., the country's first New Urban community.

New Urbanism is an increasingly popular countermovement to suburban sprawl that spread across U.S. cities after World War II, said John Norquist, president of the Congress on New Urbanism, a Chicago-based nonprofit group.

It discards suburban zoning that leads to winding streets, cul-de-sacs and separated retail areas that force residents to drive -- even to get milk.

It took 18 months to get a separate zoning ordinance enacted for Norton Commons, Tomes said.

Norton Commons homes mimic those in older neighborhoods in Louisville, such as Cherokee Triangle, Crescent Hill and Old Louisville.

"Look at the Cherokee Triangle. We fight tooth and nail to preserve every inch of that," Tomes said. "Yet there wasn't a law on the books that would allow us to re-create that."

Metro Louisville planning director Charles Cash said the city prefers the development of complete communities, where people have more access to retail closer to their homes.

"People want a contemporary lifestyle with the conveniences of the great American small town," Cash said.

The houses will not be cheap -- with prices ranging from at least $200,000 to several million dollars, he said.

Townhouses will start at $160,000, and apartments will be built later, with rental rates still undetermined, he said.

But Louisville developer Chris Fuelling said New Urbanism could work for people who prefer small yards and who like to walk, but he said there's still plenty of demand for large houses on big lots.

"I'm finding that people just want a lot of land, and they don't want houses stacked on top of each other," said Fuelling, who co-owns Fuelling Built Homes.

Rick and Trish Garlock, owners of The Treasured Child toy store in La Grange, are planning to open a store in Norton Commons. They are looking at buying a "live-work" space in the village square, where they will live in a 3,000-square-foot apartment above their store.

The couple lived in Europe for several years, Rick Garlock said, where such neighborhoods were common.

"You got in your car once a week maybe. You went out the front door and there was the butcher, a grocery shop where you got fresh fruit, a clothing shop," he said. "That kind of lifestyle is appealing."

Cissy Walker said she is already forming neighborhood friendships. The Walkers felt isolated in their old house, which sat on 5 acres in the Fox Trail subdivision of La Grange.

"We had neighbors in La Grange who had been there for two years, and my husband had never even spoken to them," she said.

For her husband, Scott Walker, the new house, with only a few feet of grass between it and the sidewalk, is a welcome change.

"I was a little tired of taking care of the yard," he said of old house. "I just didn't have the weekends free to maintain all that."

Gaylon Owens, 42, a resident physician who just moved to Louisville with his wife, said Norton Commons was perfect for them. They moved from a Memphis, Tenn., neighborhood similar to Louisville's Highlands.

They wanted to live in an urban neighborhood, but they also didn't want the maintenance an old house requires.

"We were kind of depressed, like, where are we going to go?" said Owens, who is completing his residency in internal medicine at University Hospital.

They were planning on getting an apartment until they heard about Norton Commons, he said. They just moved into a $370,000 Federal-style house across the street from the Walkers.

Owens' wife, Kristi, a resident oncologist, is due to deliver a baby girl in October, he said.

"We like the idea of being able to go to a park in our neighborhood or take the baby carriage and go down the street to the ice cream parlor," he said. "I know it sounds kind of corny. But it's better than getting in the car to go somewhere."

SChristopher
July 25th, 2005, 09:25 AM
Arent you the dude afraid of Trannies?

deheni
July 25th, 2005, 09:45 AM
Trannies are old ladies?

mdude
July 25th, 2005, 10:46 AM
"Seven years in the making, Norton Commons is an attempt to build a pedestrian-friendly town with an urban atmosphere -- with a mix of houses, apartments and townhouses, pools, parks, playgrounds, restaurants, shops and a school all within a few minutes' walk."

Sounds like traditional suburbia to me.

card04
July 25th, 2005, 04:13 PM
Atleast it's a step in the right direction, away from the huge acre per lot development we are seeing in the outer suburbs of Louisville ( right outside of Jefferson county). Also you got to think that even the Highlands that we all know and love was considered a suburb back in it's infantcy. I wouldn't worry about it competeing with Old Louisville or any older neighborhood for that matter, this development will attract people who probably would've moved to the suburbs any way.( Do you honestly think someone from La Grange would want to move into a real urban area?) Though this development mimics Louisville's older neighborhoods, and might do an alright job, we all know that nothing is ever quite as good as an original.

Cardpooch
July 25th, 2005, 05:08 PM
I don't have a problem with this development. It is an improvement over previous suburban developments. Most importantly, this project is located in Jefferson county. Therefore, it isn't really competing with the city. Instead, it simply adds another dimension to the housing options available in the city.

card04
July 25th, 2005, 06:53 PM
Good Point

SDfan
July 25th, 2005, 08:06 PM
Well this type of "urabnity"is going on in San Diego County. A lot of the subs are going to there "downtowns" and filling them with 5,6 and 7 story projects. I know in the city of Ocenaside there building a 12 story resort hotel as well as numerous 5-8 story projects. Its not all bad from what I see. The more Urban the better.

gych
July 25th, 2005, 08:53 PM
"Seven years in the making, Norton Commons is an attempt to build a pedestrian-friendly town with an urban atmosphere -- with a mix of houses, apartments and townhouses, pools, parks, playgrounds, restaurants, shops and a school all within a few minutes' walk."

Sounds like traditional suburbia to me.


I dont think you get it--they are producing exact REPLICAS of victorian mansions they have seen in the city and building in the burbs. Also, it is important to note that this development will straddle Jefferson AND Oldham Co. and will further accelerate dense development into Oldham. Furthermore, people who are moving in here say they like it bc they can walk--As if they have never been in the city or ANY city for that matter. A city the size of Louisville needs to concentrate on infill and redevelopment in the core county.

Like San Diego, we are also seeing high rise urban projects in the burbs. The new Seminary Woods luxury condos in Glenview will be 12 stories and start at 500k.

And to SChris, I am not afraid of trannies, or whatever you like to accuse me of. I simply made a comment about homeless, trannies, and other strange ppl walking through Old Louisville, and wondered if their neighborhood wasnt turning as yuppy as it seemed to be going.

CU_rak
July 25th, 2005, 11:01 PM
It sounds like these people are just trying to re-create the 1950's small town life, not true urbanism. Do these places have public transit?? I would guess not, since that usually brings true diversity and a range of incomes into an area. These people want "bubble cities" that hearken back to a simpler, more peaceful (and imaginary) time when you could walk to the corner for a starbucks, see your kids off to an all-white school, and then drive your Hummer to work.

schreiwalker
July 26th, 2005, 12:41 AM
It sounds like these people are just trying to re-create the 1950's small town life, not true urbanism. Do these places have public transit?? I would guess not, since that usually brings true diversity and a range of incomes into an area. These people want "bubble cities" that hearken back to a simpler, more peaceful (and imaginary) time when you could walk to the corner for a starbucks, see your kids off to an all-white school, and then drive your Hummer to work.

brilliant!

though I have to say, I like new urbanism much better than suburban tract development, so am fully ready to support it. Though it'd be hard to support any project so sad as to create exact replicas of homes nearby. I mean, please. that is soooooo lame.

but I think a lot of people are lame, so at least they'll have somewhere nice to live

card04
July 26th, 2005, 01:20 AM
"but I think a lot of people are lame, so at least they'll have somewhere nice to live"


HAHAThats a good one, but in all serious gych you know as well as I know (and anyone who knows Louisville) that they can replicate old Louisville all they want but it will never have the character or charm of the original. Plus I doubt that they will take the time to replicate the the stone work on a lot of those homes, all the Norton Commons houses I've seen were siding. I'm not really concerned about it competing with ANY of Louisville's older neighborhood, most people that move into this development are searching for Mayberry more than true urbanism. It's an out of the ordinary development which I believe will be a nice addition to that area, would you rather a run of the mill development with half acre lots, at least this development is somewhat dense.

"A city the size of Louisville needs to concentrate on infill and redevelopment in the core county."

I couldn't agree more, and most of development is still happening within Jefferson County, I believe more houses were built in the Jefferson county than just about all other counties in the metro area combined. I think considering the area that Louisville does a pretty good job at not sprawling out, compared with other cities in the surrounding area.

NovaWolverine
July 26th, 2005, 06:00 AM
I think it's a great step in the right direction. As long as it's more urban, then it's good, sometimes the cities are just too expensive so it's good to give some the more urban lifestyle for a lower price. And there are some smart growth neighborhoods in the DC area that have a metro stop and a few bus stops right next to it.

GetOnDaTrain
July 26th, 2005, 06:15 AM
I think it's a great step in the right direction. As long as it's more urban, then it's good, sometimes the cities are just too expensive so it's good to give some the more urban lifestyle for a lower price. And there are some smart growth neighborhoods in the DC area that have a metro stop and a few bus stops right next to it.
Just like in other suburban towns outside the major city. Just as long as you have transit villages consisting of apartments and townhomes up to three blocks away from a transit rail station, and shops and restaurants, at least it is New Urbanism for real when you only do it the right way. New Urbanism is done wrong when you make up density and still lack transportation options.

gych
July 26th, 2005, 08:27 AM
Just like in other suburban towns outside the major city. Just as long as you have transit villages consisting of apartments and townhomes up to three blocks away from a transit rail station, and shops and restaurants, at least it is New Urbanism for real when you only do it the right way. New Urbanism is done wrong when you make up density and still lack transportation options.


Well, considering Louisville has no commuter rail (and they still havent progressed with light rail) this is a bad development. We do have commuter buses that serve the area but I wonder how many people use them. No matter what anyone says, this IS competing with the city's old hoods. They even quote someone in the article moving to Louisville from Memphis. They say they like the Highlands (historic, dense and eclectic city hood), but like this suburban area better because they do not want "the upkeep on an old house." Also, the cookie cutter shopping is better in the burbs--you cant get Walmart in the city. So I guess to each his own, but I know I'll take the history, architecure, diversity, pedestrian friendly hoods in the city with ecletic shops and eats over any prefabricated suburban deal--even if it looks or feels old school.

card04
July 26th, 2005, 06:46 PM
The people moving into old Louisville probably have the same mindset as you do gych,yes architectually this may be able to look similiar but for all the reasons you just mentioned old Louisville will always be a level above anything out in Norton Commons. I have faith that most people in Louisville also realize this. Yes some people prefere newer developments, most people looking for dense urban living no better than to see this development as being so and will turn to Old Louisville or the highlands.Do you honestly think it could ever compete with atmosphere of Bardstown Rd,Baxter Avenue, Frankfort Avenue, St.James Ct, it won't even come close.

Cardpooch
July 27th, 2005, 02:08 AM
I think a fuss is being made over nothing here. The couple mentioned in the article stated that they chose Norton Commons over Highlands because they didn't want to deal with the upkeep on an older home.

Some people act as though there is something wrong with this mindset. We can talk all we want about how older urban settings are better than suburbia but the bottom line is there are advantages and disadvantages to both. I live in an old neighborhood and just spent $7,000 to have 100 year old trees removed from my property before a storm blew them into the house. Some people don't feel that the extra character is worth the hassle or expense and I can't blame them.

So in that respect, this development will have virtually no impact on Old Louisville because people chosing to live in Norton Commons prefer a suburban lifestyle anyway. If Norton Commons didn't exist, there is a good chance the couple mentioned in the article would have ended up in Oldham County. Is that the better alternative?

Louisville needs to take advantage of the fact that Jefferson county still has large areas of undeveloped land. This is a luxury a lot of large cities don't have. I don't want to see every square inch of the county developed but growth patterns in surrounding counties should be studied. Then the city can find ways to try and harness that growth closer. If I was involved with city planning, I would start working now on getting a similar higher density development started in the Taylorsville Rd. area near Gene Snyder. This being another high growth area.

The bottom line is that a well developed city should offer a wide variety of quality housing options for its residents. Louisville's strength will always be it's older neighborhoods and I'm actually glad that devlelopers are looking at these areas as inspiration for current projects.