View Full Version : Chicago to get a new tallest!!


CULWULLA
July 28th, 2005, 02:21 AM
seems like you have to twist your bldg these days . what ever happened to a straight sided bldg?lol
height-610m to spire
roof-444m (1 metre higher then Sears)
115storeys

http://images.suntimes.com/popups/spire/images/spire5_700.jpg

In Chicago, Plans for a High-Rise Raise Interest and Post-9/11 Security Concerns
By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO
CHICAGO, July 25 - In a city known for its skyscrapers, in an era when tall buildings have become targets, can the skyline handle one more that stretches the limit? In Chicago, it seems, the answer may be yes - if the architect is a "starchitect" like Santiago Calatrava.

Mr. Calatrava, a Spaniard who lives in Zurich, has designed what would be the country's tallest building for Chicago. The developer, Christopher T. Carley, plans to announce the $500 million project on Tuesday.

The structure would be called the Fordham Spire and is proposed to be built at North Water Street and Lake Shore Drive, near where the Chicago River meets Lake Michigan. It would be 115 stories, topping out at 1,458 feet to its roof. A spire on top would reach about 2,000 feet, making the building the country's tallest.

The Sears Tower, at 1,729 feet, is now the tallest when antennas are included. The Burj Tower in Dubai, under construction, is said to be planned at 2,300 feet, which would make it the world's tallest.

Developers in Chicago have tried in recent years to erect another large skyscraper to add to the Sears Tower, John Hancock Center and Aon Center, 3 of the 15 tallest buildings in the world. A soft commercial real estate market doomed those efforts. But Mr. Carley, a local developer of expensive residential properties, said the Fordham Spire - named after his development firm, the Fordham Company - would be a mixed-use tower with 200 to 250 condominiums atop a 20-story hotel. He said that its unique design, which resembles a drill bit, a blade of grass or a tall, twisting tree, depending on whom you ask, would attract high-end buyers eager to live in a Calatrava structure.

Both developer and architect said they were mindful of security concerns in designing the tower. Mr. Calatrava, in an interview, said he never set out to design the tallest building but instead was drawn to the project by the chance to do something special for the "heroic Chicago skyline."

"Nobody is saying it has to be the highest building in the country," Mr. Calatrava said Monday from Zurich. "The idea was to build a very slender, elegant building in this skyline."




http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/ap/20050727/capt.cx10107271606.chicago_skyscraper_cx101.jpg?x=254&y=345&sig=nMr2QWj_Rm4NStePGiruIg--

marty_k
July 28th, 2005, 03:07 AM
Bah! Brisbane had that idea first with Baroque (http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=101900)!

As for this one, I like it :)

fro
July 28th, 2005, 08:42 AM
wow! Very cool!! I should hang out in this forum more often!
It is very reminiscent of a drill bit, lol,. but still an impressive tower... I think in that render above they didn't even manage to capture the entire spire in it!! :lol:

expat_marla
July 28th, 2005, 09:34 AM
i really want to like this tower but i'm actually having a hard time doing that. maybe its the location and the pictures that (understandably) front it up before everything else. or maybe its the pic i saw in another thread where someone actually replaced the tower with a birthday candle that has me a bit off pace on it??

BrizzyChris
July 28th, 2005, 10:54 AM
I like it!

cammo2004
July 28th, 2005, 12:31 PM
I'm not crash hot on it frankly. Decent design, just doesn't suit the site.

AltiusAltiusAltius
July 28th, 2005, 01:12 PM
Not sure about any super tall skyscraper on the waterfront. Has the tendency to unbalance the skyline (like the 2 IFC in Hong Kong). Great design though (better than Calatrava's residential proposal for Lower Manhattan!).

I have also heard of the very tall tower proposed for Michigan Ave - Illinois Place and not far from Millennium Park. Should be anchored by Mandarin Oriental who have been looking for a suitable Chicago location for some time...Would be a great addition to their other US properties (TWC, NYC and California Tower, SF). Sadly, the Ritz-Carlton is expected to close down in the Water Tower Place...maybe Oprah Winfrey is expanding her apartment lol)

aussiescraperman
July 28th, 2005, 01:41 PM
the attack of the giant twizzler!

Trances
July 28th, 2005, 02:38 PM
huge and also almost a realistic chance ?
worth watching

renell
July 28th, 2005, 03:03 PM
Well.. Chicago will get a new face from this... not exactly my favorite design for a supertall.

Blue_Copper
July 28th, 2005, 03:06 PM
i'd raver that tower in I-robot

ncon
July 28th, 2005, 03:08 PM
great for Chicago !! :)

ncon
July 28th, 2005, 03:17 PM
Btw the design look like turning torso :

http://img134.echo.cx/img134/2432/4100249841002498finished23co.jpg

Saithkar
July 28th, 2005, 09:00 PM
Looks like a novelty candle if you ask me, even has a wick....

IloveGeorgeBush
July 28th, 2005, 10:10 PM
Is this going to get built? Because if it doesn't get built, then you people are getting excited for no reason.

Icanseeformiles
July 29th, 2005, 09:00 AM
most would be afraid to fall FROM a building...I would be afraid to fall ON this one. Looks nasty!

A r c h i
July 29th, 2005, 10:40 AM
Love the word 'starchitect.' Absolute classic. The building would make a good slide.

Perth4life
July 29th, 2005, 12:53 PM
looks like the wtc proposal to much.

uewepuep
July 31st, 2005, 05:50 AM
looks like the wtc proposal to much.
It doesn't look anything LIKE Freedom Tower (http://www.skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?11970945).

It amazes me that New York gets a *box* to be its new wonder of architecture and Chicago gets something magic when its not even trying. Fordham Spire would be so perfect for the WTC site its not funny.

renell
August 1st, 2005, 12:23 PM
to the engineers in here.. does a 'turning torso' like building have any structural advantages to a normal building, or is it just there to look good?

A r c h i
August 2nd, 2005, 11:57 AM
^It would handle the wind alot better, as there is no flat surface for the wind to push on.

demanjo
August 2nd, 2005, 12:36 PM
Yeah the wind hitting it would be redirected easily, and hence less pressure on the building.

Jimmy James
August 7th, 2005, 12:00 AM
Hmmm Ryobi Tower!

That'd make a great ride sliding all the way down - of course you'd be dead at the end - but nothing's perfect!

I agree with the comment about the skyline looking unbalanced - it's sort of off to the side isn't it!

Urbandeco
August 10th, 2005, 05:56 AM
Wow, I think it is brilliant. I would love to see that tower rise. I think it would really fit in well for the "city of tall shoulders"

Faustus74
August 10th, 2005, 01:57 PM
Trying a touch too hard. :toilet:

SUNNI
August 10th, 2005, 04:10 PM
the spire looks out of place,,,,very ill fitting