View Full Version : archived:Aurora Tower - 69st/207m/res (Part 3)
CULWULLA August 21st, 2005, 02:50 PM time for new thread.
old thread here>
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=5133192#post5133192
current height as of today is lev60 or 61 or 176m/180m.
a render reminder (cottee parker)
http://www.cotteeparker.com.au/images/projects/multi_res/popups/aurora_popup01.jpg
rear view
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7940/aurorarear2up.jpg
some recent pix.
defec8r
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_5995_1024.jpg
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_1118_683.jpg
jayt
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9130/picture1047ut.jpg
JayT August 22nd, 2005, 01:00 AM Pictures this morning.
http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/4306/picture1086jc.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/9844/picture1117uz.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
CULWULLA August 22nd, 2005, 01:43 AM yeah looks like lev59 in box.
thanks
ephix August 22nd, 2005, 02:38 AM Creeping up over CP1 - taken last tuesday.
http://www.ephix.net/filedump/aurora1.jpg
http://www.ephix.net/filedump/aurora2.jpg
BrizzyChris August 22nd, 2005, 11:48 AM Nice shot ephix.
JayT August 22nd, 2005, 02:28 PM Its looking more intersting from the back now, the glass section kind of juts out and is framed with a concrete box. Looks good - well that bit does, the rest of the tower is pretty average IMHO. It looks like its getting better as it gets higher though.
Oh - the podium level wall facing Wharf Street is an extreemly bad outcome, concrete panels hiding a car park? I don't know how you guys could like this. At least they have tried to make Riparians car park section look interesting - this is just plain ugly.
Sorry but you know me - I have an opinion and am not afraid to use it!
Aussie Bhoy August 23rd, 2005, 05:39 AM Maybe it's just me, but to me, as I drive into work most days, it doesn't look to have increased in height for at least a month.
finn August 23rd, 2005, 05:51 AM Sorry but you know me - I have an opinion and am not afraid to use it!
Don't apologise JayT - nobody needs to apologise for their opinion as long as they have justified it, as you have done. :)
Shado August 23rd, 2005, 06:24 AM Today:
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20050823/images/IMG_06241.jpg
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20050823/images/IMG_06571.jpg
CULWULLA August 23rd, 2005, 06:37 AM looks every inch 60storeys!top shot
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20050823/images/IMG_06241.jpg
marty_k August 23rd, 2005, 07:14 AM Lookin' good. Nice pics :)
Malt August 23rd, 2005, 09:51 AM FUCK.
shadow, that pic cul quoted is ... amazing.
Not only does the building looks awesome but it looks freakin 250m.
lol!
Cant wait for it to be taller and be painted, AND have the glass iris.
Shado August 23rd, 2005, 02:59 PM Here's the original if you want:
1.2 MB (http://www.shadodotnet.net/linked/SSC/large_IMG_06241.jpg)
Oriolus August 24th, 2005, 02:03 AM Crazy Fact: Aurora is the 115th tallest building under construction in the world right now and the 4th tallest under construction in Australia. (Source:Emporis)
JayT August 24th, 2005, 02:05 AM Crazy Fact: Aurora is the 115th tallest building under construction in the world right now and the 4th tallest under construction in Australia. (Source:Emporis)
What are the other three tallest buildings under construction, Q1, Eureka, Circle?
Oriolus August 24th, 2005, 02:11 AM Yep.
http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/9720/aurora74jr.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Thanks for the big pic Shado. I took a piece of it, you can see the beginning of the glass section. Anyone know what colour is the glass going to be?? Green then blue futher up or entirely blue(ish) like this render?
http://www.auroracbd.com.au/images/photos/hi-rise%20model.jpg
Oriolus August 24th, 2005, 04:11 AM I havn't seen this one before. From RealEstate.com.au
http://img391.imageshack.us/img391/3889/aurorared2bn.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
CULWULLA August 24th, 2005, 05:04 AM What are the other three tallest buildings under construction, Q1, Eureka, Circle?
currently the tallest bldgs uc in oz are>
OVER 150m
16 towers!
Q1/GC-322m (will be taken of list in 1 month)
Eureka/Mel-297m
Circle on cav north/GC-219.5m
Aurora/brs-207m
FWP1/mel-205m (removed soon)
meriton/syd-170m
Verve/mel-170m
westpac/syd-166m
E&Y/mel-165m (removed soon)
SX/mel-163m (removed soon)
RDT/mel-162m (removed soon)
Circle on cav south/GC-158m
Lumiere/syd-151m
Bris sq/bris-151m
aspect/syd-150m
UWS/mel-150m (removed soon)
Rusty August 24th, 2005, 02:06 PM thats a lovely render, but the perspective looks all wrong. like it seems to be to scale, but CP1 looks alot shorter than in photos from that same angle.
JayT August 25th, 2005, 08:11 AM Photos today
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/2383/picture0194tn.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/556/picture0212xh.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/8724/picture0673je.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/6808/picture0680mb.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
cp1 August 25th, 2005, 12:22 PM When do u think the glass section will be visible (sorry if this has been answered before).
JayT August 25th, 2005, 01:08 PM When do u think the glass section will be visible (sorry if this has been answered before).
It already is visible.
Malt August 25th, 2005, 02:09 PM no it isnt. Not enough to class it as such
U cannot clearly see it yet.
Wait for them to remove the caging a bit and u will be able to.
Wezza August 25th, 2005, 02:23 PM You can see the bottom of the glass section at the rear of the building, but only just.
JayT August 26th, 2005, 06:32 AM no it isnt. Not enough to class it as such
U cannot clearly see it yet.
Wait for them to remove the caging a bit and u will be able to.
You can now - another rise has occured today:D
Just a question, are people expecting reflective glass as in the renderings? You know buildings don't often look exactly like the renderings and Aurora is just one example - sorry to dissapoint. The glass in the renderings is depicted as blue reflective (yuck) and in reality its looking more like black glass with a little reflection - much better in my opinion. Look at Felix as they are very similar towers.
Oriolus August 26th, 2005, 06:43 AM Any resemblance to Felix would be fantastic IMO. It's my favourite Brisbane resi. So far I'm kind of wishing that Aurora & Felix would swap heights.
JayT August 26th, 2005, 06:54 AM Any resemblance to Felix would be fantastic IMO. It's my favourite Brisbane resi. So far I'm kind of wishing that Aurora & Felix would swap heights.
I'm with you there - I love Felix too. It's the same architect, Cottee Parker, but the colour scheme will be different. I hope they use red somewhere though - love red on buildings.
CULWULLA August 26th, 2005, 07:48 AM the blades atop Aurora look reddish ,more brown though.
Orfeo August 26th, 2005, 01:56 PM Just a question, are people expecting reflective glass as in the renderings? You know buildings don't often look exactly like the renderings and Aurora is just one example - sorry to dissapoint. The glass in the renderings is depicted as blue reflective (yuck) and in reality its looking more like black glass with a little reflection - much better in my opinion. Look at Felix as they are very similar towers.
While the larger render on the previous page does show very reflective blueish glass in the upper section of the tower, it isn't clear that the glass on the body of the tower is the same. However this render does show dark glass and a bas that seems quite consistant with the real thing....
http://www.cotteeparker.com.au/images/projects/multi_res/popups/aurora_popup02.jpg
I don't particularly expect it to follow the render perfectly, especially with the reflectiness of the glass but it seems to have done a decent job so far. As Malt said, at least previous to the rise today, it was quite difficult to determine much about the glass would look like. I wouldn't be surprised if they used a different kind of glass for the central column section - especially after your pictures of the rear....they seem to have changed glass at the back, why not the front?
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/6808/picture0680mb.jpg
But I havn't seen it yet, so perhaps your right.
Orfeo August 26th, 2005, 02:08 PM This is old, but I can't remember seeing this shot here -
http://www.pd.com.au/auroracbd/P1000151.jpg
Orfeo August 27th, 2005, 07:02 AM The glass is definately blue and the relfectivity is hard to tell with it being so overcast but it doesn't seem to be particularly strong at this point. Quite similar to that of Felix really.
CULWULLA August 29th, 2005, 12:40 AM You can now - another rise has occured today:D
Just a question, are people expecting reflective glass as in the renderings? You know buildings don't often look exactly like the renderings and Aurora is just one example - sorry to dissapoint. The glass in the renderings is depicted as blue reflective (yuck) and in reality its looking more like black glass with a little reflection - much better in my opinion. Look at Felix as they are very similar towers.
so finally reaches lev60. another milestone at 176m, its just surpassed CP1 to become 2nd tallest in brisb.c
JayT August 29th, 2005, 03:38 AM http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/7964/picture1174uc.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
^^ ^^
This morning
andy77aus August 29th, 2005, 09:16 AM Its actually 61 in box now isnt it?
JayT September 1st, 2005, 06:49 AM Another rise is occuring as I type this. She's moving pretty fast!
CULWULLA September 1st, 2005, 06:52 AM lev61 = 180m! or 190mRL.
must be looking impressive.
GMAC September 2nd, 2005, 12:40 AM Looking fantastic, even the back of the building is already taking on a new life with only 3 of the new plate floors fully visible.
JayT September 8th, 2005, 04:35 AM Another rise occured about an hour ago.
defec8R September 8th, 2005, 10:26 AM http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_1529_768.jpg
taken this afternoon... Aurora grabbing centre stage off the big R :cheers:
nerazzurri September 8th, 2005, 10:52 AM Nice, rising quickly this one.
Malt September 8th, 2005, 11:13 AM wont b long now
Wezza September 8th, 2005, 11:37 AM Nice pic defec! Imagine that with, Aurora, Brissie Square & Vision complete! :)
defec8R September 14th, 2005, 02:31 PM Another rise today, now 63 in the box. I've got a photo but it's a bit too silly to post.
CULWULLA September 14th, 2005, 02:36 PM cool. level 63= 186m high. or 196mRL. thats only 8m lower then Riparians 204m roofRL.
dont tease us. please post the pic.lol
BrizzyChris September 14th, 2005, 03:28 PM What amazes me most about that photo is how graceful Riparian looks on the skyline now. How did we live without it?!
defec8R September 14th, 2005, 04:19 PM same old view (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_6181_1024.jpg)
Malt September 14th, 2005, 04:24 PM didnt u have another photo a couple of weeks ago also with a bird in that view :|
what are the chances eh
BrizzyChris September 14th, 2005, 04:31 PM I am not kidding when I say this, but I was having lunch at the lookout today and I swear that exact magpie came next to me and we had a staring contest!
CULWULLA September 15th, 2005, 12:29 AM didnt u have another photo a couple of weeks ago also with a bird in that view :|
what are the chances eh
last photo was a Butcherbird, latest pic is a Magpie.
good stuff.
Oriolus September 15th, 2005, 07:21 AM Nice defec. You must feed them do you? You reckon you can get any other species with Aurora in the background?
That one looks like a nominate race female Australian Magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen tibicen). The previous photo looked like a immature Grey Butcherbird (Cracticus torquatus) :)
defec8R September 15th, 2005, 11:34 AM ^ I sometimes tear off and throw little bits of raw meat to the birds, which they seem to enjoy. Hope that's not doing them an ill turn?
Regular visitors are a couple of magpies (pretty sure one is the other's parent) and a pair of grey butcherbirds. Actually four - one pair moved in and replaced the old two, though sometimes I see the occasional dogfight and hear separate duets going on at the same time - shouting matches.
some pics...
maggie having a drink (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_6148.jpg)
butch having a drink (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_1087.jpg)
in outta the rain (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_5536.jpg)
mmm lamb chops (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_5161.jpg)
greedy (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_5228.jpg)
they can have that computer it's buggered (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_1102.jpg)
different bird (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bird/IMG_5955.jpg)
Malt September 15th, 2005, 11:39 AM lol nice pics :D
I posted ur win photo in world forums in a thread Oriolus made. btw.
Submit it in ext photo contest, no joke. do it :|
defec8R September 15th, 2005, 11:55 AM You mean the Story Bridge night panorama? Ok I'll throw it in next week's UPC. I can imagine it better though - higher, extra row of images with sky/sunset detail and Aurora fully grown.
Malt September 15th, 2005, 11:59 AM night time shots win, and when someone does a really good one u cant ignore it :O
BRISBANE September 18th, 2005, 04:28 AM Will Aurora have a spire-if so how tall?
BrizzyChris September 18th, 2005, 05:40 AM Originally it was going to, but not anymore.
Locke September 18th, 2005, 11:53 AM A sleepy little town on last friday nite feat aurora:
http://static.flickr.com/31/44150175_1be2975523_b.jpg
Chad September 18th, 2005, 11:55 AM :eek2:
Maroon Grown September 18th, 2005, 12:18 PM sweet photo dude!
CULWULLA September 18th, 2005, 12:31 PM top pic defec! Aurora doesnt look much shorter then riparian.
brissy is looking good.
Malt September 18th, 2005, 12:54 PM looks fkn awesome.
Beautiful Photo.
I thought it was defec8rs before i read the posters name.
nice job
CULWULLA September 18th, 2005, 12:58 PM oops, on ya locke!
Malt September 18th, 2005, 01:01 PM ahaha didnt notice you did it too.
Locke, this is quite a compliment that we both mistook u for Defec.
(he is arguably the forums best photographer )
Wezza September 18th, 2005, 11:05 PM Hell yeah, top marks to locke for that pic!! :) Awesome.
CULWULLA September 19th, 2005, 03:07 AM A sleepy little town on last friday nite feat aurora:
http://static.flickr.com/31/44150175_1be2975523_b.jpg
same view 2008
http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/4435/auroraskyime8su.jpg
nerazzurri September 19th, 2005, 04:25 AM That's one amazing picture.
Redress September 19th, 2005, 04:30 AM now we are officially backslapping again - wow way to go - great pics Locke -- lol
BRISBANE September 23rd, 2005, 05:16 AM sorry if this has been answered before.
when will it reach 207m?
GMAC September 23rd, 2005, 08:12 AM Soon........ If you look in the picture above they are currently working on the horizontal glass section so probably close to the end of the year.
BRISBANE September 23rd, 2005, 08:15 AM so it'd be taller than riparian already...or at least in a few weeks
GMAC September 23rd, 2005, 10:57 AM Yeah to roof it will be higher, and because of its RL it will look even higher.
CULWULLA September 23rd, 2005, 12:23 PM BRISBANE- I think Aurora is currently lev64 or 189m? we need a clos up pic. it has been going up a floor a week. still another 5 or so, thus 5 weeks to top out? it once had a spire in design which was 238m high.
pic from nagalixon
view from 220mapprox (uip rips antenna).
http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/1077/ripaian30470xy.jpg
Orfeo September 23rd, 2005, 12:26 PM ^
it is at least 64 in core at the moment, perhaphs higher since I havn't been close up for about a week now.
CULWULLA September 23rd, 2005, 12:28 PM thanks orfeo- so le64 is 189m or RL199m. still 5m below Riparians 204mRL. wow, so next week it should equal its height?
Orfeo September 24th, 2005, 10:20 AM Still 64
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/d5b9393f.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0036.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0043.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0044.jpg
Once it is painted I think the blue glass will become much more obvious.
CULWULLA September 24th, 2005, 10:51 AM nest rise equals Riparians RL height of 204m.
this really does look like a smart /safe design.not run of the mill.
So i think Riaprian topped out in march , so its only been numero uno for approx 8 months? looks like Aurora will surpass it next month. bit of history!
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0036.jpg
excellent pi\x orfeo!
Locke September 24th, 2005, 11:07 AM Horrible picture, but I took it out of a moving car:
http://img398.imageshack.us/img398/6456/aur1hl.jpg
Grantus September 24th, 2005, 11:55 AM bah, i think your underestimating yourself there ;)
I think you have a good eye, aswell as a good camera :D
Malt September 24th, 2005, 12:33 PM not bad at all for a moving car lol.
BrizzyChris September 24th, 2005, 02:06 PM Is it just me, or are they already painting the exterior of the lower levels?
Malt September 24th, 2005, 03:27 PM theyre painting them yes
1_gtar September 25th, 2005, 06:14 AM I don't know if this has been posted, but algamated property group now has completion dated for April 2006. Not too long ago, they said it was December this year (or January next. I forgot)
CULWULLA September 25th, 2005, 06:22 AM ^It will look completed externally at xmas but i suppose internally it wont be done until april.
defec8R September 25th, 2005, 07:13 AM http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_6214_1024.jpg
Aurora looms impressively while driving in along Ann Street... picture doesn't really show it, you gotta be there.
duke September 25th, 2005, 08:12 AM Also making its presence felt from Waterworks Road in Ashgrove.
Locke September 25th, 2005, 01:10 PM I haven't been down Eagle Street in a while, gotta say driving up it Aurora was BIG already, the fact it's on a hill helps no doubt.
CULWULLA September 25th, 2005, 02:04 PM looking at Auroras rear elevation from defecs pic., it looks like the corebox has the floor above the 12 curved blue balcs levels in it
model showing same rear.
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7940/aurorarear2up.jpg
CULWULLA September 26th, 2005, 12:54 AM recent pic by aussie buoy
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y246/AussieBhoy/BrisSep2005/GallowaysHillview4.jpg
JayT September 26th, 2005, 01:05 AM http://www.realestate.com.au/objects/props/9253/102689253ml1127375245.jpg
nikko September 26th, 2005, 09:07 AM Have all apartments been sold?
I'm imagining quite a few will go on the market as this nears completion.
JayT September 28th, 2005, 01:04 AM Some shots of Aurora this morning - check out the vehicle being lifted up by the crane.
Early Aurora
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3845/picture0377sx.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5448/picture0504jq.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6353/picture0511bi.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/8497/picture0554yr.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5359/picture0841fb.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/9956/picture0873vu.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6480/picture0881xw.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/2281/picture0852fr.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
CULWULLA September 28th, 2005, 04:24 AM great shots. the truck looks so small up there!
hey ive noticed from riverside you can see Aurora all the way down nearly to street! why? isnt there anything across the road? is Customs House some where there?
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3845/picture0377sx.jpg
JayT September 28th, 2005, 04:52 AM ^^
Customs house is in front - if you look carefully you can just see the top of the green dome and a white flag pole.
Here is another one I took this morning.
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4152/picture0543dq.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
17 floors up September 28th, 2005, 05:09 AM I'll be up in Brissy in early December - will Aurora top out by then?
CULWULLA September 28th, 2005, 05:31 AM Aurora has 5 more floors to go or 5 weeks, so should top out in mid nov.
Grantus September 28th, 2005, 05:44 AM Was up in brisbane on Sunday and i must say Aurora is looking damn fine. It's a bit skinnyer than i first thought, as its got higher, but its not really that bad.
Rusty September 28th, 2005, 12:21 PM LOOK WHAT I FOUND WHILE SEARCHING GOOGLE!
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=834689
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=832143
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=421773
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=497023
I like.
Wezza September 28th, 2005, 12:32 PM ^ Some nice angles there!!
BRISBANE October 5th, 2005, 08:17 AM from early this year aurora has gone up so fast. but since mid-september is hasn't seemed to have grown at all. what do they have 1 peson working up there or something? also is auroras RL higher or lower than riparians?
1_gtar October 5th, 2005, 08:46 AM The roof is about 7 metres taller than Riparians
Grantus October 5th, 2005, 08:53 AM from early this year aurora has gone up so fast. but since mid-september is hasn't seemed to have grown at all. what do they have 1 peson working up there or something? also is auroras RL higher or lower than riparians?
afaik it has been very consistent with a floor rise a week since the start of the year. I would say it looks like it has slowed down because of how much taller it looks.
From the start of the year it was just below the mbf building, and since it has overtaken it tremendously then theres nothing else around it to make it look like its rising.
BRISBANE October 5th, 2005, 08:57 AM what the ####? all the times were buggered and when i pressed a link it said a hacker has screwed the site?
see this link
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showt...95&page=1&pp=20
1_gtar October 5th, 2005, 09:10 AM I don't know if anyone has noticed this but on the right of the building, they've always had a one or two storey metal tower. (It can be seen from spring Hill) It's a good indication of how fast it's growing. In fact, the metal tower hasn't been put up since the building itself caught up with it mid-september.
Ausilencer October 5th, 2005, 12:13 PM I tend to agree with Grantus, I think you'll find the building has been moving at roughly the same pace, it just *appears* to be moving slower due to the fact it is now so large and towers over the rest of the city. A good way to gauge has been since the reveal of the 'blue glass' at the top of the tower. That has been slowly getting revealed over the last few weeks - at a reasonably steady pace.
But I think it *may* have slowed in the last week, I have noticed a number of other sites seem to have had a couple of RDO's recently, and Aurora may be no exception.
MajikShoe October 5th, 2005, 12:51 PM It has definately slowed down in the last week, I walk past daily on the way to work and there have been 6 glass panels at the back of the building for quite a while now. Yesterday morning they didnt even have the footpath blocked off (which is odd for a normal workday). Someone mentioned earlier that they might have been reconfiguring the box for the upper levels which would explain it.
duke October 5th, 2005, 01:05 PM It has definately slowed down in the last week, I walk past daily on the way to work and there have been 6 glass panels at the back of the building for quite a while now. Yesterday morning they didnt even have the footpath blocked off (which is odd for a normal workday). Someone mentioned earlier that they might have been reconfiguring the box for the upper levels which would explain it.
I don't think there was any work on any major developments on Monday and Tuesday of this week. Brisbane Square was shut down for both days. Strike or RDO's?
Maroon Grown October 5th, 2005, 01:17 PM it was RDO's!
defec8R October 5th, 2005, 03:34 PM Still at 64, hasn't moved for over a fornight now.
GMAC October 6th, 2005, 12:47 AM As well as RDO's, I tend to agree with Dorigen that part of it is the fact that the floorplate is changing again. The metal tower that 1 gtar mentioned, is that the top of the builders lift?
JayT October 7th, 2005, 11:06 PM There busy 'doing things' this morning. I noticed that big pieces of the core walls - or whatever they are called are being lowered down. Looks like the building is changing shape.
Its a significant change anyway - biggest since the glass started a few months ago.
I took pictures but I have to get ready for work so I'll put them on tonight;)
Hi Guys - when I said Busy things I thought it was going to be a massive day for Aurora. This morning early there was a great deal of activity on the tower, removing the core panels ect. It looks like they haven't done much since as the tower looks similar to this morning - though different from Yesterday. It looks like the core is changing shape.
cp1 October 8th, 2005, 03:30 PM BRISBANE, aurora's roof level is 198m's i think, while riparian's is 200m. Aurora's fins/blades or 'architectural features' take the buildings height to 207m. (correct me if iam wrong.)
1_gtar October 9th, 2005, 12:23 AM I'm pretty sure that's right, although officially the building is 207m. A while ago there was discussion on the forums as to whether or not it should be given the title of tallest tower in Brisbane.
CULWULLA October 9th, 2005, 07:26 AM ^ nah things have changed a while back when i found out the height of Aurora was extended from 67storeys to 69 storeys or from 201m to 207m. The top floor is 199m but you wont see this level as it has a 7m wall around it. thus reaching 206m. The rear LMR goes to full 207m the blades rise up to same height as main roof which is 206m.
see here what i mean>
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7940/aurorarear2up.jpg
cp1 October 9th, 2005, 02:40 PM Is that actually a genuine render of what aurora will look like?
cp1 October 9th, 2005, 02:42 PM I walked past auroras podium this morning and was surpirsed at how excellent it was looking.
MajikShoe October 10th, 2005, 02:00 PM Is that actually a genuine render of what aurora will look like? Yep, thats what it will look like from the back.
BRISBANE October 11th, 2005, 10:28 AM jeesus, wait one more week and nothing will have happened 4 a month. the construction of this looks way different than riparian. i wish they'd remove the bloody caging.
cp1 October 11th, 2005, 10:55 AM Atleast its overall being built quicker than riparian was.
Danubis October 11th, 2005, 05:43 PM they've started to paint the cement on the back. a lightish creamy colour it would seem. - as observed when walking home past the UQ medical building in herston this morning.
BRISBANE October 13th, 2005, 05:21 AM shit this is slow. the crane seems to be moving alot more in the last few days but nothing has happened
cp1 October 13th, 2005, 08:27 AM shit this is slow. the crane seems to be moving alot more in the last few days but nothing has happened
Patience BRISBANE, patience.
CULWULLA October 13th, 2005, 08:31 AM i think your used to Aurora racing up a floor evry 5days. this is the teasing part of construction.The builders know the ssc members are watching its every move .they know its a new tallest .lol
defec8R October 13th, 2005, 08:32 AM Four to go... we've finally hit 65 today.
rotten afternoon (http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_6277_1024.jpg)
CULWULLA October 13th, 2005, 08:34 AM great. lev65= 192m or RL202m. next rise surpasses Riparian.
1_gtar October 15th, 2005, 04:39 AM The crane rose today. It's noe the same height as the tower will be. I think.
Oriolus October 16th, 2005, 06:10 AM I just realized something - 207m divided by 69 storeys = exactly 3m. That means the Aurora has a lower height per floor ratio then any existing building in the world over 200m. Current lowest is Westin Peachtree Plaza in Atlanta with 220m/73storeys = 3.01369863. See thisd thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=250359) for more details.
1_gtar October 16th, 2005, 07:41 AM They like to squeeze em in for the resi buildings. However, those architectual things they have on the roof make them a bit taller. Shouldn't you be measuring it from the highest appartment? That would make the floors even shorter.
CULWULLA October 16th, 2005, 08:24 AM I just realized something - 207m divided by 69 storeys = exactly 3m. That means the Aurora has a lower height per floor ratio then any existing building in the world over 200m. Current lowest is Westin Peachtree Plaza in Atlanta with 220m/73storeys = 3.01369863. See thisd thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=250359) for more details.
from plans , the typical floor to floor is 2.85m.there are some lower floors that are over 3m also plant.
JayT October 19th, 2005, 08:53 AM Bit of a milestone for Aurora today - She's had another core rise.
I think this makes Aurora the tallest now in Brisbane.
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/9040/picture0017ju.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Sorry about the quality of these photos - the light isn't very good today.
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/1681/picture0040be.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
You can clearly see the top is changing now quite a bit.
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/997/picture0079ch.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
BRISBANE October 19th, 2005, 09:16 AM so level 66?
the crane must be in top 5 tallest points in southern hemisphere.
How many metres now?
BRISBANE October 19th, 2005, 09:22 AM no, that makes it 198m i think. next rise and it will be 1m taller.
JayT October 19th, 2005, 09:42 AM Couple more - some bigger ones;)
Skyline Pic
http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/395/picture0017nw.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/2238/picture0043gq.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
cp1 October 19th, 2005, 09:45 AM Looking good, almost there. Does anyone know the actual scheduled completion date?
CULWULLA October 19th, 2005, 11:47 AM great lev66= 195m or RL205m which makes it 1m higher then Riparians RL. woohoo
the crane rises appro 50m above corebox,thus 245m or height of Vision.
The construction should top out in late nov, and tower should open march2006ish.
great photos jayt
cp1 October 19th, 2005, 12:05 PM So brisbane has a new tallest! :)
Oriolus October 19th, 2005, 12:43 PM Well Aurora isn't Brisbane's tallest building...yet. It's just Brisbane's highest building.
things have changed a while back when i found out the height of Aurora was extended from 67storeys to 69 storeys or from 201m to 207m. The top floor is 199m but you wont see this level as it has a 7m wall around it. thus reaching 206m. The rear LMR goes to full 207m the blades rise up to same height as main roof which is 206m.Now I was looking at the renders trying to work at exactly were Aurora's at, and I realised (unless I'm missing something) that all the ones we have are 67 floors - there aren't any renders of Aurora at 69 floors. And it doesn't look like the upper sections of the tower are all that faithful to the renders we have now - is it possible the top of the tower could look quite different to the renders we have?
JayT October 19th, 2005, 12:49 PM Well Aurora isn't Brisbane's tallest building...yet. It's just Brisbane's highest building.
Now I was looking at the renders trying to work at exactly were Aurora's at, and I realised (unless I'm missing something) that all the ones we have are 67 floors - there aren't any renders of Aurora at 69 floors. And it doesn't look like the upper sections of the tower are all that faithful to the renders we have now - is it possible the top of the tower could look quite different to the renders we have?
There was a render at 69 floors about 2 or 3 threads back - it was a big picture. The floors were added on to middle section.
scooter_aus_dj_74 October 19th, 2005, 01:05 PM I read somewhere recently that the first people will be moving in around April 2006.
Locke October 19th, 2005, 01:30 PM Looking good:)
Muse October 19th, 2005, 02:16 PM Dwarfs everything in its immediate area. :eek:
cp1 October 22nd, 2005, 11:43 AM So what colour is the concrete going to be rendered?
1_gtar October 23rd, 2005, 01:52 AM Amalgamated property group says april next year for completion.
Shado October 23rd, 2005, 07:46 AM Picture taken last night:
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/Brisbane/20051022/Shado_2005-10-22-BNE-IMG_7327.jpg
neilo63 October 23rd, 2005, 08:50 AM Pity how ugly aurora is from the rear - same with riparian.
CULWULLA October 23rd, 2005, 08:53 AM i dont know. i think Auroras has a nice rear.
looking at photo,theres 1 more large l\floor plate to go then the smaller upper levels .
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7940/aurorarear2up.jpg
Rusty October 23rd, 2005, 09:56 AM Is that top bit all glass?
CULWULLA October 27th, 2005, 02:51 AM someone requested a new render of Aurora at 69 levels high
http://img438.imageshack.us/img438/2416/auorabrisbane0fa.jpg
SteV October 27th, 2005, 03:19 AM What will be at the base of this tower? Retail / cafes? Or will it just be an entrance to the residential tower?
Oriolus October 27th, 2005, 03:55 AM ^^ Thanks Cul. So the two extra floors are inserted just below the glass.
compare>
http://www.cotteeparker.com.au/images/projects/multi_res/popups/aurora_popup01.jpg
GMAC October 27th, 2005, 04:27 AM Cant wait to see this one when its painted. I have to say I am impressed with the back, there is a lot more glass than I had expected, I just cant wait till they top out in a couple of weeks. They must be working on the top residential level by now arent they, anyone got an update pic? There is so little to go that its hard to tell when something happens.
BrizzyChris October 27th, 2005, 04:37 AM I think it's still only level 67 in the core.
defec8R October 27th, 2005, 04:40 AM 67 in the box after a rise this morning I think...
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_6354_1024.jpg
BRISBANE October 27th, 2005, 05:18 AM How high now?
GMAC October 27th, 2005, 05:38 AM What level is the highest residential floor, because looking at the above pic three of the top four levels are there, or at least you can see the windows?
BrizzyChris October 27th, 2005, 06:04 AM How high now?
Look at the picture.
GMAC October 27th, 2005, 06:13 AM LOL!!
CULWULLA October 27th, 2005, 06:27 AM great pic defec
67 in dabox = 198m. or RL208m
gmac- i think the highest resi floor =67. theres 2 levels in the top plantroom section.
defec8R October 27th, 2005, 06:38 AM What level is the highest residential floor, because looking at the above pic three of the top four levels are there, or at least you can see the windows?The top levels you can see are 64-67 -- 66 is half covered by the white wall and 67 is behind the blue wall.
zoomed pic from the old camera: http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_4856_800.jpg
CULWULLA October 27th, 2005, 06:41 AM next rise, it will join the 200m club.
cp1 October 27th, 2005, 11:41 AM Yey, so next rise it will be equal to riparian (soz but i get all the RL stuff mixed up).
Muse October 27th, 2005, 05:25 PM 67 in the box after a rise this morning I think...
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_6354_1024.jpg^^ Nice pic. Poor (but fabulous) CP1 looks squat now. Next will be Vision to make Riparian and Aurora look squat lol.
This reminds one of what Perth went thru in the late 80s/early 90s, suddenly changing the skyline forever with the construction
of its very talls; BankWest Tower (formerly R&I) and Central Park.
CULWULLA October 28th, 2005, 12:49 AM Yey, so next rise it will be equal to riparian (soz but i get all the RL stuff mixed up).
next rise Aurora will be 201m (1m higher then Riparian) or 211mRL which is7m clear of Riparians roof RL of 204m.
cheers
Shado October 28th, 2005, 09:35 AM This afternoon:
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20051028/Shado_2005-10-28_Brisbane_AuroraUC.jpg
Shado October 28th, 2005, 09:39 AM Closer:
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20051028/IMG_7438-4.jpg
BrizzyChris October 28th, 2005, 09:49 AM The top looks weird, but I really like it.
Muse October 28th, 2005, 09:52 AM Yowser!! Beautiful pics there Shado :)
1_gtar October 28th, 2005, 09:57 AM Front glass is visible looks good
JayT October 28th, 2005, 10:42 AM Closer:
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20051028/IMG_7438-4.jpg
Its amazing how small it makes the other buildings look. I mean Emirates is quite big in its own right but next to Aurora it looks puny. Given Aurora's floor height it looks much further back and hence larger too.
CULWULLA October 28th, 2005, 11:59 AM great pix shado
hey the core box is going. maybe being reduced to cater for the much smaller upper floors.
that photo is great showing a former "tallest in Brisbane" with a new tallest!
The 16storey in front of Emirates. It was first highrise in Brisbane to break 40m hieght. In 1965 reaching 200ft/61m. There was a bldg taller (Torbreck) but this was 2km from CBD out at Highgate.
cheers
GMAC October 28th, 2005, 12:19 PM Its interesting how the whole way up the tower the floors have really closely followed the walls and corebox if you can call it that with this sort of construction, but they havent poored any of the top 3 residential floors yet.
Shado October 31st, 2005, 12:22 PM Today:
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20051031/IMG_7568.jpg
http://www.shadodotnet.net/photos/brisbane/20051031/IMG_7581.jpg
BrizzyChris October 31st, 2005, 12:26 PM Farking tall. Hard to believe the WTC was twice that height.
cp1 October 31st, 2005, 12:42 PM and the new tallest towers in dubai and india are 4 x that height. OH GOD.
Locke November 1st, 2005, 01:50 AM I must say Aurora is starting to scrub up quite nicely, and in its position has much more of an impact than Riparian on the skyline.
BRISBANE November 1st, 2005, 10:49 AM from now to the end this will be the really slow bit, have to put in all the glass and curved glass roof.
1_gtar November 1st, 2005, 11:04 AM All we can do is hope that we don't have Riparian job at the end.
CULWULLA November 1st, 2005, 11:15 AM and the new tallest towers in dubai and india are 4 x that height. OH GOD.
the current tallest is approx 350m (roof-300m).Most of new towers range from 250m-400m high, so not quite double. Only the Burj Dubai (705m) will be just over 3 times as high.
I think 207m is a very impressive height!
1_gtar November 1st, 2005, 11:33 PM I thought they weren't releasing the official height of the Dubai tower and that there were rumpurs it would reach 900m.
Even so, the solar tower in New South Wales will be 1000m- 5 times the height of aurora.
CULWULLA November 1st, 2005, 11:42 PM ^ the 705m is the approved height for the tower. Thye have to submit amendments for additions. It just seems so weird thay could keep it secret from public. The plans should be lodged with council which is allowed to be public knowledge.
The Solar Tower was going to be a 200MW project but latest news (Sept) was there now working on a 50MW structure. The height and bulk havent been decided yet but it does sound to have shrunk to under 500m.
cp1 November 2nd, 2005, 08:14 AM If ur wondering what tower in india, it is 'nodia' tower. Apparently it has been approved and should be around the 700m mark. Spokesman from Burj Dubai said they will keep adding floors until Burj Dubai gets the title.
Maroon Grown November 2nd, 2005, 08:24 AM what the??? india with a 700m tower. it barely has towers over 100m and they wanna go straight for the title. who the hell in india has that sought of money?
SUNNI November 2nd, 2005, 08:29 AM If ur wondering what tower in india, it is 'nodia' tower. Apparently it has been approved and should be around the 700m mark. Spokesman from Burj Dubai said they will keep adding floors until Burj Dubai gets the title.
more like adding a longer spire..
SUPRARZPOWER November 2nd, 2005, 08:37 AM Gee Aurora is looking a hell of a lot better now. I wish it was in Melbourne instead of fwp1 cos it is a much classier tower. It has also taken the focus off Ripiarian which is ugly compared to it. How good will Brisbane look once you have vision??
1_gtar November 2nd, 2005, 09:13 AM what the??? india with a 700m tower. it barely has towers over 100m and they wanna go straight for the title. who the hell in india has that sought of money?
Not India- Dubai- The united arib emirates in the middle east. It's speedy development makes Brisbane look like crap.
On one street, they even have a crane traffic control.
Gertzy November 2nd, 2005, 09:18 AM Fark, thats gettin Tall, much taller since the last time I saw it.
Orfeo November 2nd, 2005, 10:21 AM Not India- Dubai- The united arib emirates in the middle east. It's speedy development makes Brisbane look like crap.
On one street, they even have a crane traffic control.
Maroon was talking about Noida tower, which is in India.
CULWULLA November 2nd, 2005, 11:18 AM the silly noidia tower has been mooted for years.
anyway
cp1 November 2nd, 2005, 12:38 PM woops, thought it was recent news, owell.
Maroon Grown November 2nd, 2005, 12:41 PM Not India- Dubai- The united arib emirates in the middle east. It's speedy development makes Brisbane look like crap.
On one street, they even have a crane traffic control.
everyone knows dubai :wallbash:
Wezza November 2nd, 2005, 01:07 PM Dubai Schmubai.... lol
Anyways, i'll get to see this 1st hand on the weekend. Last time i saw Aurora, it was only a baby still. :)
cp1 November 2nd, 2005, 01:15 PM dw wezza u will be rather impressed i think.
Oriolus November 5th, 2005, 07:39 AM Gee Aurora is looking a hell of a lot better now. I wish it was in Melbourne instead of fwp1 cos it is a much classier tower. Wow, I'm suprised to hear anyone say that. Give me FWP anyday. Aurora is looking a bit better in those last few photos but the glass still seems dull and ineffective and the rest of it is still quite bland. I'm sure it'll scrub up okay but I don't think it'll ever be one I really like.
salamagd November 5th, 2005, 07:53 AM Gee Aurora is looking a hell of a lot better now. I wish it was in Melbourne instead of fwp1 cos it is a much classier tower.
Back in your box now ;)
JayT November 5th, 2005, 09:13 AM Gee Aurora is looking a hell of a lot better now. I wish it was in Melbourne instead of fwp1 cos it is a much classier tower. It has also taken the focus off Ripiarian which is ugly compared to it.
Eww - what kind of drugs are you on :jk:
Freshwater Place is one of my fav buildings going up in Australia - its much better than Aurora (my personal opinion). Aurora is pretty ugla - especially from the back - and Riparian is much better looking. Hopefully they will do something nice to Aurora as its still underconstruction.
Orfeo November 5th, 2005, 09:18 AM I think it will look a lot better when it is painted
http://i.pbase.com/v3/93/329493/1/51226994.BrisbaneOct05675.jpg
nerazzurri November 5th, 2005, 10:52 AM Aurora is pretty ugla - especially from the back - and Riparian is much better looking. Hopefully they will do something nice to Aurora as its still underconstruction.
Hmm, I thought you said Aurora looked ugly but the back looked better than the front? Unless that was someone else. :tongue3:
As for how good Aurora is looking, I think it's great...I especially am an huge fan of the top section of the tower.
Locke November 5th, 2005, 11:33 AM Well it looks better than Riparian, that's for sure! Though I think it's outclassed by the Gold Coast residentials like ConC, Soul, Q1 etc.
Having said that, I see Aurora as more of a warming up act for Vision, which will be the first truly good lookin tally in Brisbane since CP1.
CULWULLA November 5th, 2005, 11:38 AM Aurora is a better overall tower then fwp1. more interesting. bland blade stuck on a huge podium.
Aurora has more presence.
GMAC November 5th, 2005, 02:46 PM Aurora is going to be one hell of a gorgeous tower when finished, no doubt about it. I find it hard to compare it to FWP1, which I also love, cos they are totally different styles of buildings designed for two totally different sites. Aurora would not look anywhere near as good at Southbank Melbourne, just like FWP1 wouldnt look as good on the Aurora site.
Wezza November 6th, 2005, 11:28 PM After seeing Aurora on the weekend for the 1st time in about a year, i was quite impressed. It has a huge presence, so imposing. It's great how you can see the tops of Aurora & Riparian from places where you would not have otherwise seen any towers beforehand.
SUPRARZPOWER November 7th, 2005, 08:09 AM I stick by my comments AURORA ROCKS and FWP1 is lame.
The design of Aurora is just so much better and once completed will look a lot better. Oh and it's 2m higher isn't it.
Locke November 8th, 2005, 10:32 AM I think the reason Aurora has more impact than Riparian is that, at least from the south, it appears to be a very dark building, with only the sky behind it, as opposed to the white of Riparian, and as such is more striking to the eye.
Orfeo November 8th, 2005, 10:38 AM http://www.qtcu.asn.au/webcam/ShowImage.aspx?img=webcam01.jpg&h=188&w=384
Oriolus November 9th, 2005, 04:11 AM Thanks Orfeo. I didn't know the Queensland Teachers Credit Union had a webcam? Aurora looks huge from that angle.
Here's the page for the webcam: http://www.qtcu.com.au/webcam/10minutes.asp
It's from the roof of the QTCA in St Pauls Tce, the Valley.
defec8R November 10th, 2005, 09:04 AM in the Emperor's voice:
RISE
Aurora hit 68 yesterday - here's a view of it from Mt Coot-tha taken early this morning
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_2307_1024.jpg
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_2307-IMG_2316_enblended.jpg
JayT November 10th, 2005, 09:30 AM ^^^^
It must have been early this morning - it is getting light at 4:30am, was probably more like late last night;)
Great Pic - whats with the lighting on the Casino, looks like a cake!!
defec8R November 10th, 2005, 09:40 AM Actually it was 3:22am, and probably the only thing still awake in town was the casino, which is why it stands out (that and lens flare). I thought about staying for a dawn photo but skies were grey :sleepy:
Danubis November 10th, 2005, 10:55 AM rediculous amount of zoom there?!!? amazing
Wezza November 10th, 2005, 11:46 AM You're right JayT, the casino looks fantastic!! :) Nice pics defec. Did you wet the bed last night or something? ;)
CULWULLA November 10th, 2005, 12:31 PM excellent defec! lev68= 204m. or RL214m, so its 10m higher then Riparians roof.
really stands out now.
Malt November 10th, 2005, 01:51 PM thats amazing zoom and quality.
And lol. The casino IS a cake.
m01lim November 11th, 2005, 07:13 AM Fantastic pictures! thanks.
But this just goes to show, as being discussed in the other thread, the rooftop lighting of buildings in Brisbane for the most part really does suck.
duke November 11th, 2005, 07:52 AM Fantastic pictures! thanks.
But this just goes to show, as being discussed in the other thread, the rooftop lighting of buildings in Brisbane for the most part really does suck.
Interestingly, the photo has been taken after some roof lighting has been turned off. The arms of the pyramid on 111 George are lit in white earlier in the evening and I'm sure that the roof of CP1 has a blue strip of lights across the top.
SUPRARZPOWER November 11th, 2005, 08:44 AM Xcellent shots there. Just a point of interest does ripiarian light up at night at all.
1_gtar November 11th, 2005, 11:24 AM Not right now, but we're hanging on to the possibility that it'll light up when more offices come in.
Locke November 11th, 2005, 02:39 PM Fantastic pix, obviously late at night since CP1 has had it's blue neon turned off, I imagine at that time of night most fancy light systems might get switched off to save some money.
Though yeah, Riparian's lighting is crap, like it would kill em to run some neons along the top.
Orfeo November 12th, 2005, 03:10 AM http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/6eefbdbb.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0360.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0358.jpg
Orfeo November 19th, 2005, 05:31 AM Today...
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7504/img0384a4nq.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0376.jpg
[IMG]http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/Orfeo4/IMG_0375.jpg
A r c h i November 19th, 2005, 05:39 AM I've gotta say Iwasn't too impressed with Aurora when I first saw the render but now it's really grown on me. Will it be completed externally this year or will we have to wait till next?
cp1 November 19th, 2005, 11:12 AM I think the heritage part will look good against the building
JayT November 19th, 2005, 11:26 AM I think the heritage part will look good against the building
I noticed yesterday they have re-painted the sign "Queensland Country Life". I think thats ironic - no?
1_gtar November 19th, 2005, 01:06 PM I've gotta say Iwasn't too impressed with Aurora when I first saw the render but now it's really grown on me. Will it be completed externally this year or will we have to wait till next?
They reckon the exterior by the end of the year, but the whole thing will be done by about April (interor and all)
Locke November 19th, 2005, 03:37 PM Yeah I think cos it never had any really good renders Aurora is a mildly pleasant surprise, I say mildly because there is nothing 'Wowoweewow' about it.
All the same it looks pretty good from the front. The back is another story, too much concrete, maybe some paint will fix it, at least one hopes.
cp1 November 20th, 2005, 01:22 PM yer i think the front is starting to look quite good now, but the back is very plain.
Gertzy November 23rd, 2005, 10:26 AM Nearly finished by the looks of the Mt Coot-ha photos, how Tall is it now 190m, 200m so on someone give me an estimate or Answer.
lozza November 23rd, 2005, 10:36 AM ^^^
i agree, the front is nice, but the back is farken woeful ! :rant:
Oh well, at least its better than Riparian ! :puke:
Lozza
CULWULLA November 23rd, 2005, 12:59 PM Nearly finished by the looks of the Mt Coot-ha photos, how Tall is it now 190m, 200m so on someone give me an estimate or Answer.
the corebox is being dismantled beacuse the typical floor has been compelted. now its the top plantroom section. Its approx 197m now with central core which runs from front to back yet to be constructed. also the 10m high walls will be built to encompass the core.
BrizzyChris November 23rd, 2005, 01:11 PM Looked good in the rainy mist this afternoon.
Maroon Grown November 23rd, 2005, 01:28 PM wait till they give the back a paint job. it will scrub up ok!
Wezza November 23rd, 2005, 01:44 PM ^^^
i agree, the front is nice, but the back is farken woeful ! :rant:
Oh well, at least its better than Riparian ! :puke:
Lozza
You're jumping to conclusions.
Gertzy November 25th, 2005, 09:24 AM I have to disagree, I like Riparian better actually, especially with both sides alright.
Citystyle November 25th, 2005, 09:28 AM The front is amazing but the back is not really the best.
cp1 November 25th, 2005, 09:42 AM I still think riparian wins my vote, but aurora has not fininished so it might change.
defec8R November 27th, 2005, 11:36 PM from Ann St - dog ugly but it seems to look taller from the back...
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/aur16.jpg
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/aur17.jpg
Eagle St -
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/aur19.jpg
Mt Gravatt -
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/IMG_6552_1280.jpg
CULWULLA November 28th, 2005, 12:48 AM excellent. i love this tower even from rear.
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/aur17.jpg
you can see what is left to build
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7940/aurorarear2up.jpg
skyline looks good. gee brisbane sq is huge.should stand out especially with the larger top 9 floors built!!
cheers
Locke November 28th, 2005, 01:13 AM Yeah I was at the Kangaroo Point cliffs at sunset yesterday (great view btw) and Aurora looks like this big black monolith, looked great. Also was noticeaby taller to roof than Riparian due to the building sitting a bit higher up and that.
defec8R November 28th, 2005, 06:55 AM excellent. i love this tower even from rearYeah I guess the rear is brutal atm but pretty good really. It's the contrast with the front that takes away from it. Living on the northside I'm sick of looking at this tower's arse every day. Even so it's a hell of an improvement on Brissy's skyline of course.
What's crucial now is the colour scheme. Absolutely no admiralty vomit-tones, please choose from black/white/blue/dark grey.
Yesterday pre-storms
http://www.ct4host.lunarpages.com/bne/aur20.jpg
GMAC November 28th, 2005, 08:17 AM I quite like the back for a building that actually has a definite front and back design, and I think the changes at the top make all the difference, and of course the paint job will change things big time.
Aussie Bhoy November 28th, 2005, 08:53 AM I was in town, a bit drunk on Friday night, but as I waited for a lift and looked up at Aurora it looked amazing. I was at the front of Customs House at about 2.30am, and there were storm clouds and mist just obscuring the top of Aurora, it looked so good. Wish I'd had my camera there, it would have been the best skyscraper picture I have ever taken.
BrizzyChris November 28th, 2005, 11:04 AM I'm so used to see the scaffolding and lift core on Aurora, it will be so weird when it is taken down.
Oriolus November 29th, 2005, 02:03 AM So 68 in the box is it? One more rise to go? Watching Nine news the other day it looked massive. It sure does make a mighty silhouette. Hopefully it'll look good in the harsh light of day as well by the time it's finished.
nerazzurri November 29th, 2005, 03:11 AM Aurora is a beauty, back and front is looking great so far and it's ginormous.
CULWULLA November 29th, 2005, 03:22 AM So 68 in the box is it? One more rise to go? Watching Nine news the other day it looked massive. It sure does make a mighty silhouette. Hopefully it'll look good in the harsh light of day as well by the time it's finished.
yes, there is one more floor but then theres the top plantroom section which is equal to 3 floors.(see model pic). the central core which is seen from rear rises to full 207m and then theres the 3storey high see-through walling for the plant.
ive been a bit wrong with my height estimates. its currently about 197m high top of corebox. So its RL= 207m which is 3m higher then Riaprians RL. you can see this is defecs pic above. so still another 10m or so! its end Rl will be 217m! or 13m higher then Riparians.
CULWULLA November 29th, 2005, 03:46 AM heres a simplistic diagram showing progress ,mmight make more sense
REAR ELEVATION
http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/7126/aurorabris0pi.jpg
GMAC December 1st, 2005, 12:56 PM Did I see the corebox being dismantled this afternoon? Or was it just the angle I was looking at, cos from Peel St, South Brisbane, it looked like the front of the corebox was gone.
CULWULLA December 1st, 2005, 01:18 PM yeah the corebox will go now beacuse typical floors have finished. its now time for the top plantroom/core ect.
Danubis December 4th, 2005, 04:55 AM http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v499/danubiis/IMG_0091small.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v499/danubiis/IMG_0094.jpg
Orfeo December 4th, 2005, 05:05 AM Nice pics - the back actually looks quite good in them.
MajikShoe December 10th, 2005, 10:47 AM The core box is now completely removed, not far to go now...
duke December 10th, 2005, 11:28 AM ....and the facade to the right hand side on Queen Street has now been uncovered.
|
|