I have just read the most discusting and hateful post i've ever seen on these forums. The posts in by neocon in the threads below clearly incite terrorism and are only meant to stir up pro/anti muslim hatred. these posts clearly have no place on ssc forums, even in skybar. Please ban this user for the good of all.

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=5454481#post5454481

If you think neocon is inciting hatred and is helping terrorist causes then you can always contact MI5 on this page

https://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page6.html

Or Scotland Yards Counter Terrorist Department on this page

http://www.met.police.uk/counter_terrorism/index.htm

Or you can ring the anti-terrorist hotline on: 0800 789 321

Anyone who says what neocon says really wants to watch their back. The 2000 terrorism act also covers the internet. Anything to do with terrorism such as promoting that the terrorists are doing good and you get seen doing it, your buggered. Hopefully sent to prison for afew years like some of the other guys.

He's not in the UK though is he.

So what, we'll send in special forces or have him extracted from the country hes in.

He just can't keep away can he. :ohno:

Well, he's banned now.

Shame you can't ban people who show a complete lack of intelligence....

There someone on this forum who falls into that catagory.

1 + 1 = 11! :crazy:

Does this mean we can ban Gareth now?

Gareth's equation makes perfect sense to me :nuts:

No I was thinking of BRISBANE when I made that suggestion, glad to see he's been banned now. What a complete and utter phleb he was.

No I was thinking of BRISBANE when I made that suggestion, glad to see he's been banned now. What a complete and utter phleb he was.

I've added you to my buddy list hope you don't mind:D:D:D

No I was thinking of BRISBANE when I made that suggestion, glad to see he's been banned now. What a complete and utter phleb he was.

I thought phleb was spelt pleb. Or is that a typo? :?

Shame you can't ban people who show a complete lack of intelligence....

Sure we can... People who behave like complete dolts are often found to be trolling (baiting others for a fight), and often do so with a regularity which indicates they do so with malice and personal pleasure. This manner of person is generally not acceptable as a member, and we will indeed ban them if the need arises.

There must be some modicum of order and civility, else the forum becomes rubbish.

People who behave like complete dolts are often found to be trolling (baiting others for a fight), and often do so with a regularity which indicates they do so with malice and personal pleasure. This manner of person is generally not acceptable as a member, and we will indeed ban them if the need arises.
...
As a pejorative, the term, "troll", is often used to slander opponents in heated debates, in a way similar to the use of the term "noob" in online games. Both the person who identify himself as a "troll", and the one who vehemently denies it, will use the term, demonstrating to neutral third parties that both participants are, in fact, trolls. Accordingly, the view has arisen in some circles that the plural, "trolls", is a valid term, and that, as it takes two to troll, it is not valid to refer to anyone in the singular, i.e. "troll". Others, however, feel that "it only takes a boat to troll, and the fish has a choice as to whether to bite or not". In other words, they claim that one person can do it alone. Then again, it must be noted that for some fish, biting is a conditioned reflex.
So which camp are you in Mr House? If a "fish" "bites" does that make them a "troll"?

Lest I need remind you Earlybird, a person who has been Brigged has but one remaining chance before being permanantly banned.

If I were in your position, I would extremely careful not to provoke a reaction from moderation.

Lest I need remind you Earlybird, a person who has been Brigged has but one remaining chance before being permanantly banned.

If I were in your position, I would extremely careful not to provoke a reaction from moderation.
Lest I need remind you Mr House, I was brigged with no prior warning.

The question stands.

:tyty: