View Full Version : Canada Greatly Lags U.S. in Wireless Penetration


rt_0891
October 5th, 2005, 07:25 AM
Canada greatly lags U.S. in wireless penetration

By JOHN PARTRIDGE

Tuesday, October 4, 2005 Posted at 9:17 PM EDT

From Wednesday's Globe and Mail

Here's another kick in the national pride for anyone under the illusion Canada is the world leader in telecommunications it likes to think it is.

Even though the number of Canadian subscribers to wireless telecom services — cellphones and BlackBerrys and all that good stuff — finally cracked the 15 million mark in the first quarter of this year, we are still well behind the United States when it comes to overall market penetration.

Statistics Canada reported Tuesday that at the end of March there were 47 wireless subscribers for every 100 people in this country, a level reached in the United States in mid-2002. In fact, the most recent U.S. figure available indicates that at the end of last year, there were 61.7 wireless subscribers for every 100 people, according to Statscan analyst Cimeron McDonald.

He wouldn't venture an explanation, but telecom analysts were happy to oblige — although not before pointing out that U.S. wireless penetration itself is way, way below levels throughout most of Europe.

“We're not exactly comparing ourselves against best of breed in the wireless stakes when we take the U.S. as our metric. Even so, when we [do] we're pretty much the weakling,” said Iain Grant, managing director of Montreal telecom consulting firm Seaboard Group.

In fact, Canada ranks just 27th in wireless penetration among the top 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, according to an OECD survey.

A recent Seaboard study concluded that Canadians are less driven to go wireless because prices are still relatively high compared with the alternative, traditional wireline service. “Canadians do get a deal on wireline pricing. Therefore the ... need to move to wireless is not so compelling,” Mr. Grant said.

The study found that the average wireless customer in Canada pays a startling 60 per cent more than they would under a U.S. plan, and a 19-per-cent premium over customers of European carriers.

There are several reasons for the difference between U.S. and Canadian wireless prices. Ian Angus of Angus Telemanagement Group Inc. notes there are six or seven national players in the U.S. market so competition is fiercer than in Canada, which has only three. And U.S. competition has intensified in recent years with the spread of number portability, which allows subscribers to keep the same telephone number if they switch between providers, whether wireline or wireless. Canada's telecom regulator isn't expected to force carriers to provide this until 2007.

How much higher is wireless penetration in Europe? Figures from the International Telecommunications Union indicate rates of nearly 103 per cent of the population in Britain, more than 109 per cent in Italy and 119.4 per cent in Luxembourg. These seemingly impossible percentages stem from a growing phenomenon of users subscribing to more than one wireless service, one for the office and one for personal use, for example, said analyst Eamon Hoey, who heads telecom consulting firm Hoey & Associates Inc. of Toronto.

Mr. Hoey agrees Canada is far behind Europe in wireless technology. “And we're not going to catch up. Canada used to be a country where we prided ourselves on our telecom capability, but no more. We're not even a player any more.”

The gloomy prognosis came even as shares of Toronto-based Rogers Communications Inc., Canada's largest mobile telephone and cable operator, hit a five-year high Tuesday, a day after it raised its 2005 subscriber forecasts. Rogers' class B non-voting shares traded as high as $49.60 apiece on the Toronto Stock Exchange, before closing at $49, up 65 cents from Monday's finish.

CrazyCanuck
October 5th, 2005, 07:45 AM
What a title! Anyways I think we will catch up, the demand just isn't here yet. Even still, thats just comparing to the U.S, how do we compare to other countries?

rt_0891
October 5th, 2005, 07:59 AM
What a title! Anyways I think we will catch up, the demand just isn't here yet. Even still, thats just comparing to the U.S, how do we compare to other countries?

From the article:


In fact, Canada ranks just 27th in wireless penetration among the top 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, according to an OECD survey.

How much higher is wireless penetration in Europe? Figures from the International Telecommunications Union indicate rates of nearly 103 per cent of the population in Britain, more than 109 per cent in Italy and 119.4 per cent in Luxembourg.
Mr. Hoey agrees Canada is far behind Europe in wireless technology. “And we're not going to catch up. Canada used to be a country where we prided ourselves on our telecom capability, but no more. We're not even a player any more.”

CrazyCanuck
October 5th, 2005, 08:11 AM
Whoops, last time I just skim through an article and then make a comment about it.

habsfan
October 5th, 2005, 06:37 PM
SO what if we don't use cellphones as much. Is that really a bad thing? I don't think so!

bay_area
October 5th, 2005, 06:43 PM
Europeans are overcompensating cause overall, North America is cooler. :)

salvius
October 5th, 2005, 06:51 PM
SO what if we don't use cellphones as much. Is that really a bad thing? I don't think so!

Me neither. It's true--everyone uses wireless in Europe. I don't find it 'cool.' I actually generally find it obnoxious and rude most of the time.

Steeltown
October 5th, 2005, 06:54 PM
In fact, Canada ranks just 27th in wireless penetration among the top 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, according to an OECD survey.

Well Canada will be 27th out of top 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development that has the lowest cases of brain tumours than ;)

dtx03
October 5th, 2005, 08:56 PM
Yea it kinda sucks that we were under the illusion that Canada is a leader in the telecommunications industry - RIM and Nortel - are the only companies that come to mind with Canadian roots. But companies with roots in other countries seem to be the only ones comin out with ground breaking technology. Due time, Canada will be up there again.

There are a whole bunch of factors why Canada's ratio is lower than other countries.

Ground lines residential/commercial are the cheap compared to those around the world. Other countries, it's cheaper to have a cell phone then it is to have a home line. Compare ground lines all across the world... I'd like to know Canada's penetration...

The subscriber # is an average... Torontonians in business are known for this, as for most Americans in the same field... having 3 or more wireless peices.
At one time I had my pager, personal cell phone, blackberry, and a work pager. Crazy...

Wireless is a part of life in other parts of the world... texting craze in asia to convience in Europe (highway tolls, vending machines)...

WE ain't behind...

rt_0891
October 6th, 2005, 12:19 AM
Well Canada will be 27th out of top 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development that has the lowest cases of brain tumours than ;)

With downtowns being the epicentre of Wi-Fi hotspots, no wonder the suburbs are growing. ;)

***

My personal qualm with all this is that cellular service in this country is too expensive. I've used Cingular before (US), and compared to my current plan, I paid 2/3 the price for twice the service and coverage.

Oaronuviss
October 6th, 2005, 01:19 AM
We will catch up by 2008 I promise.

simadon
October 6th, 2005, 02:24 AM
number of wireless subscribers is no reflection of our technology. Having had been an American Cell phone subscriber I can tell you that their network is bruital. There are so many holes in reception, the rates and service sucks.

algonquin
October 6th, 2005, 04:39 AM
I prefer uninhibited penetration... who doesn't?

renthefinn
October 6th, 2005, 08:29 AM
I think the only reason we are lagging in this particular area, is because we have so little competition in this area. If we had reasonable competition, I'd guess we'd be near the top of the list, at least within the top 10.

white
October 8th, 2005, 07:22 AM
Quick everyone go out and buy a cellphone!! What a waste of good time to write an article about how Canada has less cellphones per capita than the US. Its a good thing its more money in our pockets. The reason more americans have em is because theyre being penetrated by the phone company´s marketing campains.

samsonyuen
October 8th, 2005, 12:04 PM
Good. Cellphones are annoying (especially on the bus, etc.)!

TO_Joe
October 8th, 2005, 05:23 PM
Yea it kinda sucks that we were under the illusion that Canada is a leader in the telecommunications industry - RIM and Nortel - are the only companies that come to mind with Canadian roots. But companies with roots in other countries seem to be the only ones comin out with ground breaking technology. Due time, Canada will be up there again.

There are a whole bunch of factors why Canada's ratio is lower than other countries....

Wireless is a part of life in other parts of the world... texting craze in asia to convience in Europe (highway tolls, vending machines)...

WE ain't behind...Good observations but telco (and particularly wireless) technology is serious money and seriously globally competitive. We can't afford to be behind one bit.

Here is what we need to do as a country:

1. Legislate more competition in mobile telco service. Number portability, introduction of more MVNO (mobile virtual network operators) with mutual network access, standardize on backbone techology (GSM or CDMA, not both), guaranteed network access of independently sold phone hardware (unbundling), etc.

There are basically only 3 mobile companies in Canada -- Telus, Bell and Rogers. MVNOs like Virgin are captive with Bell's network, so there is no real undercutting there (in fact, the relationship seems mightly collusive with Bell using Virgin to get at the college student crowd and giving Virigin a few bucks for their effort).

That is why the prices are high and the service rather crappy. If prices drop, you will see more people using it. And when more people use it, more services will be available (many of them will be developed by innovative and independent software companies here in Canada which can then be exported). This will generate quite a lot of entrepreneurial wealth.

At present, Canada is behind compared to Europe (UK) and Asia (Korea or Japan) in 3G. If anything, we are IMPORTING concepts and technologies rather than EXPORTING it.

2. Nortel f*cked us real good. I am not just pissed because I lost money on their stock (so did most of Canada whether they knew it or not -- most mutual funds had Nortel in there somewhere for a long time). I think they really damaged Canada's competitiveness and lead Canada had in telecommunications in the late 90s.

All of this can be traced to BCE's attempt to manipulate Nortel's stock price:
- they pushed this "convergence" thing before its time
- made expensive and rather useless acquisitions like Bay Networks (they should have bought Cisco instead) or Clarify CRM software (Nortel totally had no capability to integrate enterprise solutions to their existing operations)
- the way they merged Bell-Northern Research (BNR) into Nortel and then floated it on the market with a guaranteed price for their own holding companies
- the lies about the continued growth stories despite reports surfacing that Global Crossing, etc. were wobbly with tales of dark fibre (their own internal staff were shaking their heads)
- pressuing the Canadian government agencies like EDC to guarantee their increasingly risky loans to flaky Chinese and other telecoms just to book sales
- and if those weren't enough, during the down market and after Enron, etc., they still tried to rationalize cooking the books to meet their targets
...

I am sure there is all kinds of other shit that I don't know about. But that doesn't matter -- it shows a pattern of trying to make a quick buck rather than building a durable competitive advantage.

One thing the Canadian government can do is to stop subsidizing them or absorbing their risks and force them to compete head-on so that they feel they must do or die.

There is enough talent, money and business savvy there -- the crutches actually weaken the body and add to the rot.

3. As for cell phone etiquette, I agree we need to work on this as a society.

If the government should do something, then it should work with the service providers to launch a "courtesy" campaign so that others will not be annoyed but people will continue to increase adoption of cell phones.


Wireless adoption is good and important for Canada economically and as a player on the world stage. We need to encourage it, and bend the rules towards the consumers rather than towards these incumbent companies who are still ingrained in guaranteed money machine monopoly thinking and lobbying tactics.

PhilippeMtl
October 8th, 2005, 05:34 PM
The reason canadian don't have cellphone like in Europe is only because home phone line are very cheap.

The anti-cheesehead
October 8th, 2005, 05:36 PM
"We will catch up by 2008 I promise."

Lol, I'm going to remember that. You promised.

"Having had been an American Cell phone subscriber I can tell you that their network is bruital. There are so many holes in reception, the rates and service sucks."

Really? An "American cell phone subsriber"? Lol. Because all cellular service is on the same network across the entire United States? Geez. My cell service is excellent and cheap.

"Its a good thing its more money in our pockets. The reason more americans have em is because theyre being penetrated by the phone company´s marketing campains."

Hmm, so the real reason is that Americans are dumb and can't resist cell phone company advertising. Canadians are smart and save their money. Uh, yeah.

This thread is hillarious. First of all, who gives a shit? It's amazing that you'd even care, let alone make excuses, and stupid ones at that.

salvius
October 8th, 2005, 06:03 PM
This thread is hillarious. First of all, who gives a shit? It's amazing that you'd even care, let alone make excuses, and stupid ones at that.

Well, for once, I completely agree with you.

samsonyuen
October 8th, 2005, 06:36 PM
Agreed. What does it matter anyway?