View Full Version : PROJECT: RDT
Cat July 16th, 2004, 05:33 AM Silvermb, I think you will find that the pic you posted is not what the podium is going to look like. You can already see the difference between the render and reality as indicated above.
Aussie
the render is closer to what will be there the final design is still being worked on ... there is no way the council is going to accept the facade being left as it is at present.
also Grollo - the idea of being able to sub-let the carspaces is not going to happen can you image the owners allowing office workers to park in their car park ... I think not.
Muse July 19th, 2004, 04:09 AM @ tays & A-Brain. Hrrmmm, it really is a Catch-22. What both of you say makes perfect sense.
In a nut-shell, why not start creating a new-vibish area but then on looking around the immediate area, it doesn't give much incentive for doing so, but why let that stand in the way but if you take the risk, you may lose out....and so the ethereal cycle goes.
Hard one.
Aussie Steve August 1st, 2004, 12:59 AM http://img35.exs.cx/img35/9003/RoyalDomain.jpg
Hacksaw August 8th, 2004, 12:13 PM http://members.optusnet.com.au/haksoz/Images/08.08.04/P8071506.JPG
tayser August 8th, 2004, 12:16 PM Hey I can see [my now old] office window in that shot ;)
You didn't do another commission tower job did ya Hacks? ;)
great Yarra Valley shot as well!
jag August 8th, 2004, 02:28 PM Hey Aussie
Great pic outside that cafe in Bank St.
Great Macs 2.
Crane August 18th, 2004, 04:32 AM Likley an actual apartment will be ready for tangible inspection end '04 (Oct-Dec) including an update of ground Display.
Hacksaw August 28th, 2004, 01:12 PM http://hacksaw.port5.com/Images/28.8.04/P8271719.JPG
tayser September 12th, 2004, 02:30 AM The corebox is now visible from the Richmond / Cremorne bend.
silvermb September 13th, 2004, 05:40 AM ahh the facade makes the tower
cream exposed precast, black alpolic/balconies and electric green ... good stuff, very Melburnian or Latitude-like!
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt200409.jpg
Grollo September 13th, 2004, 06:45 AM Damn it's a massive building, looks more like an office tower than an apartment building it has such big floorplates.
Hacksaw September 14th, 2004, 10:52 AM http://members.optushome.com.au/haksoz/Images/BeaconCoveSEP04/P9131992.JPG
Favco750 September 14th, 2004, 11:04 AM ^^ pft - debate's better than just threads and threads of "ooh it's getting big" or "nice pics" etc.
:)
hhhmmmmmmmmmm
........if you suscribe to the correct trains of thought...........
:bash:
tayser September 14th, 2004, 11:10 AM "great pic Hacksaw" :lol:
Favco750 September 14th, 2004, 11:38 AM And it's looking massive from that angle too. How long till it's finished and I wish those bloody bludgers would pull there finger out.
I laugh louder when the laughter has a meaning. :) :) :)
dynamoultraclean September 14th, 2004, 01:48 PM What are those bludgers doing? Downing piss in the rain or something? How dare they.
yyyih September 15th, 2004, 05:04 AM http://mywebpage.netscape.com/yyyyih/DSC021371.JPG
Favco750 September 15th, 2004, 09:31 AM By the way Hacksaw, it really is a classy photo, regardless of all the private jokes surrounding it. What is the mob of new roofs in the foreground???? It looks like Beacon Cove from above but way too close!! Is the town Hall looking tower to the far left Sth Melb Town Hall in Banks street??????
Hacksaw September 15th, 2004, 10:49 AM By the way Hacksaw, it really is a classy photo, regardless of all the private jokes surrounding it. What is the mob of new roofs in the foreground???? It looks like Beacon Cove from above but way too close!! Is the town Hall looking tower to the far left Sth Melb Town Hall in Banks street??????
Private jokes??
Yeah, the new roofs in the foreground are in Beacon Cove (this was taken from an apartment at 147 Beach street - the 4th tower from the pier), hence the above shot of the construction of the 5th apartment building in the bayside thread.
A shot of the houses you asked about:
http://members.optushome.com.au/haksoz/P1170055.JPG
The town hall seen to the far left might be the South Melbourne Town Hall but i'm not sure.
Favco750 September 15th, 2004, 11:35 AM I have seen Beacon Cove from 12 floors up a couple of times and the roofs sure looked familiar, the distance b/w BC & RD is surely close then. The Town Hall to the right is Sth Melb town hall on Bank street, we used to drink at the town hall hotel down the road a bit 100 years ago. The Left one is Port Melb town Hall off Bay st, just checked out the melways to get my bearings a bit better.
How do you think the residents of Beacon Cove are enjoying their views diminishing by the day and being awoken at 6am every morning with the usual building site noisy rabble. Not Happy Jan!!
The three cranes you can see in your photo are a Std 1000 Mk 3 and a modified M310D (M230DSFx with fixed counterweights) at RDT (carpark extravaganzer) and a M380D which is on the old Travelodge on St Kilda Rd (Hallmark)
Hacksaw September 25th, 2004, 09:44 AM http://img60.exs.cx/img60/5598/P9242201.jpg
CULWULLA October 19th, 2004, 08:40 AM any new pix? should be as high as its neighbour now?
uewepuep October 19th, 2004, 10:29 AM It has pretty glass! But I havent had my camera with me recently.
Cat October 22nd, 2004, 06:34 AM pouring level 20 slab two to go to be as "high as the neighbours" (380)
kasperluke October 22nd, 2004, 10:59 AM http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/lukekasper/Domain.jpg
Aussie Steve October 22nd, 2004, 11:25 AM The glass is very green and the facade is very cream. Very Leafy Eastern Suburbs!
Muse October 22nd, 2004, 03:40 PM The glass is very green and the facade is very cream. Very Leafy Eastern Suburbs!Creaming my green jeans ;) . Anyone able to get a close-up pic of the green glass?
BTW Is it (actually) the eastern suburbs :? IMO it is too urban(e) to even be a suburb - also with its proximity in tow.
silvermb October 23rd, 2004, 01:24 AM earlier this month
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt200410.jpg
uewepuep October 23rd, 2004, 02:54 AM I took some on thursday, RDT spam!
http://www.melbournephotos.net/pics/2004-10-21%20Melbourne%20-%20South/IMG_1509.jpg
http://www.melbournephotos.net/pics/2004-10-21%20Melbourne%20-%20South/IMG_1387.jpg
zion October 23rd, 2004, 05:28 AM That green facades, looks very much the same texture as Q1 (GC). I though Q1 would be mirrored in glass.
Alexander21 October 23rd, 2004, 07:16 AM Muse,
No its not Eastern Suburbs, its Inner City, after all its only a couple of kilometres from the CBD on St Kilda Rd.
tayser October 23rd, 2004, 07:19 AM they're not talking about the physical location of the tower :)
Alexander21 October 23rd, 2004, 07:34 AM I'd say its South then, not East.
Aussie Steve October 23rd, 2004, 02:19 PM I was talking about the style of the building. It looks very Leafy Eastern Suburbs (Malvern, Armadale, Hawthorn, Camberwell etc.)
CULWULLA October 24th, 2004, 07:21 AM wow, cool pix guys. hey so is the tower now 19 levels +core 3 = 22?
starting to progress fast.
do you think its a good idea having a green bldg next to another green bldg? suppose World Square did it.(WT & E&Y).
Cat October 25th, 2004, 04:58 AM the glass colour is more of a blue green as per the bmw building on Kingsway. Not as green as St James next door.
tayser October 25th, 2004, 09:25 AM ^ thank god! :)
idle21 October 25th, 2004, 09:32 AM Originally posted by Aussie Steve
It looks very Leafy Eastern Suburbs (Malvern, Armadale, Hawthorn, Camberwell etc.)
How is it possible to look like 'leafy' eastern suburbs, and how do those suburbs come across as 'leafy'. What do you mean by leafy, and how do the mention suburbs fit this discription?
sakor1 October 25th, 2004, 10:10 AM 'Leafy' is a common description of Mebourne's Eastern/ Sth Eastern suburbs.... which contain many tree-lined streets of mature trees, more so than that of other suburbs around the city ;). They are just commenting how the character of the building suits/ reflects those areas.
Stu
Cat October 26th, 2004, 04:15 AM there are plenty of leafy streets in the inner north and west as well.... :)
Crane November 2nd, 2004, 07:51 AM Royal Domain Tower (RDT) -- quick notes....
1/
Prices on display room sale boards this week have significantly increased - in the hundreds of thousands of $'s - for remaining residences...compared with prices shown in or about March '04
2/
In addition to Melbourne-based agent, Butler and Co. (http://www.butlerandco.com.au/rdt.php and http://www.butlerandco.com.au/rdtphotos.php ) top-end, Christie’s Prestige Homes now is marketing RDT, too (see link below):
http://www.prestigehomes.com.au/public/pub1.dll/084B5549-0B15-48AE-A344-60E815379E35/details.htm?id={B7081F36-1E00-41D4-9CF3-AF7C4ADC7D58}&type=current
3/
No actual residence is complete yet to inspect archictural detailing. Expect able end of'04 or early '05.
4/
Now on 20th floor. 22 remaining to attain 42 levels. Based on progress, completion probably should be in between Aug-Dec '05. October 2003 no level attained (see http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/cs/?id=132546 )
tayser November 10th, 2004, 08:50 AM It's making an appearance....
http://www.thehoddlegrid.net/projects/updates/stkildaroad/rdt/rdt1011041.jpg
...just :lol: :)
Hacksaw November 28th, 2004, 09:56 AM http://img97.exs.cx/img97/2631/PB272804.jpg
CULWULLA November 28th, 2004, 12:05 PM wow, cool pic hack. going by next door neighbours height of 120m, RDT now looks 90m to core.
jag November 29th, 2004, 03:47 AM How is it possible to look like 'leafy' eastern suburbs, and how do those suburbs come across as 'leafy'. What do you mean by leafy, and how do the mention suburbs fit this discription?
LEAFY
Generally means the inner east and south eastern suburbs. Design ideas for planting these LEAFY areas were taken primarily from Sydney and London. The more expensive suburbs are associated with the word LEAFY.
However also means Parkville to the north and Williamstown to the West, etc. Leafy has commonly referred to the introduced English Plane trees that were planted over 100 years ago in the then more expensive residential growth areas. They started in Collins St and spread out from the 5 boulevards (St Kilda Rd, Dandenong Rd, Victoria St, Flemington Rd and Royal Parade) and into smaller neighbourhoods.
Prime examples are; Those above, Malvern, Ivanhoe, Toorak, South Yarra, Camberwell, Canterbury, etc.
Hacksaw December 3rd, 2004, 02:03 PM http://img51.exs.cx/img51/9170/PC022836.jpg
tayser December 3rd, 2004, 02:27 PM top shot - Hallmark's coming along nicely as well.
Favco750 December 4th, 2004, 07:13 AM Expect RDT cranes to be higher by Monday
silvermb December 19th, 2004, 04:17 AM what a monster for a residential building, huge girth.
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt200412.jpg
Favco750 December 19th, 2004, 06:16 AM The girth is directly related to all of Tayser's mates having 6 car spots each !!!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha :)
Adam from Oz December 31st, 2004, 11:20 PM Get ready to machine gun me down, hi-rise fans...
After taking some tourists through the Botanical Gardens and to the Shrine, I realised the impact this tower will have on this area.
Not good. Not good at all - I am being restrained here.
Cheers,
Adam
Tri-City Guy January 1st, 2005, 01:05 AM Do they block out views of Port Phillip Bay from the Shrine or something?
Adam from Oz January 1st, 2005, 06:56 PM This tower will simply overpower the Shrine from the Botanical Garden's main entrance - I'll try to get a pic.
Cheers,
Adam
Muse January 1st, 2005, 11:42 PM Don't quite get the picture, but as you said, you might take a pic AfO..
...
tayser January 2nd, 2005, 02:19 AM there's a larger version of this floating around somewhere:
http://www.thehoddlegrid.net/dump/rdt-botanics.png
Aussie Steve January 2nd, 2005, 05:26 AM Royal Domain Plaza:
http://img56.exs.cx/img56/4024/dsc003018ak.jpg
http://img83.exs.cx/img83/3652/dsc003024pv.jpg
http://img91.exs.cx/img91/7927/dsc003035qb.jpg
http://img84.exs.cx/img84/1955/dsc003040tz.jpg
Drunkill January 2nd, 2005, 09:17 AM Yes in say 15-29 years the botanic gardens will be like Central park in NY, surrouded by buildings quite tallish, well exept for the river side, and maybe east side, but it will be like a wall on St kilda road.
Avatar January 2nd, 2005, 09:52 AM I thought you were refering to Random Drug testing... lol
CULWULLA January 2nd, 2005, 10:41 AM Im pretty sure RDT is the last of the tall scrapers in the St Kilda Rd precinct? The height limit for most of road is just 60m.I think grollo mentioned it?
RDt is looking awesome!
RADULA January 2nd, 2005, 11:05 AM Looks very nice in the higher floors, but it seems to overpower at streetlevel especially with the above ground carparks.
Cat January 10th, 2005, 04:25 AM the site lines to the shrine from south melbourne are kept between st james and rdt. and yes it is a one off height wise for this area
Blabbyboy January 11th, 2005, 01:14 AM ugh this is turning out to be a monstrosity - has it sold well/sold out? it boggles the mind why anyone would want to live in a development like this...so cramp! this is one tower melburnians will regret for years to come.
it looks VERY ordinary IMHO. but i have high standards for melbourne!
uewepuep January 11th, 2005, 01:27 AM I actually like it.
However right now it does ooks like a stumpy fat bitch.
Meldon January 11th, 2005, 02:10 AM this is one tower melburnians will regret for years to come.
Speak for yourself! I like it and think it will look good there. A nice little cluster of scrapers creating its own mini skyline at Domain junction.
sakor1 January 11th, 2005, 02:14 AM Well at the moment it is 'stumpy', and doesn't look particularly appealing. But once complete at full height with setbacks and all, I think it will be a nice tower. Although it could use a few tall friends close by I think it will fit in nicely.
Stu
pisstake January 12th, 2005, 10:35 AM Can't say I'm a fan
I thought the renders and the models looked good, but the facade doesn't do it for me at all
melb_man January 13th, 2005, 04:27 AM This skraper is great ! When driving along freeway (from West Gate towards citylink tunnel) just looking over at St Kilda area - looks like a whole new city developing over there with this new tower going up. Its almost like a small version of Adelaide city sitting here :-). This building is going to be great.
uewepuep January 24th, 2005, 01:03 PM http://www.melbournephotos.net/pics/2005-01-24%20Melbourne%20-%20DocklandsRialto%20Construction/IMG_5528.jpg
Favco750 February 3rd, 2005, 10:43 AM anyone notice one of the cranes nearly did an mcg here today/last night?? It's boom was standing up proud at 2:30pm when I drove past and the other crane had a couple of blokes in a man box checking it all out.
mic February 4th, 2005, 06:49 PM So where in Melbourne are we going to start to see towers outside the CBD and Docklands area, I'd like to see some talls elseware.
What are the prospects for more towers on St Kilda Rd and this Junction?? Culwulla seems to think there isnt much??
Blue_Copper February 5th, 2005, 02:50 AM hopeful st kilda will get more but as CULL said
CULWULLA February 5th, 2005, 08:12 AM im pretty sure there wont be any more tall ones (over 60m/20st) along St Kilda rd.the planning dept has come down hard on these type of towers.
wow RDT is looking massive.
mic February 5th, 2005, 08:13 AM But are there still sites for these 60 metres towers around st kilda rd
CULWULLA February 5th, 2005, 08:17 AM ^ yeah im sure there is.Grollo might have more info.
tayser February 5th, 2005, 08:36 AM The Queens road side of St. Kilda Road (the tallest of the 'rows') is City of Port Phillip. Other side of the road is City of Melbourne. CoPP are more nimbyish, after all they objected to a tower proposed in MCC (Clarendon Tower's twin) that would overshadow a part of their constituency to the south of the West Gate on Clarendon.
:lol:
says it all really.
Tri-City Guy February 6th, 2005, 12:37 AM I'd like to see a long row of middle-rise of buildings (a mini St Kilda road for condos & offices) stretching down along each side of light rail strip to Port Melbourne between Evans & Station Street. A sort of continuation of Melbourne City to the bay. Of course, as you pointed out above Tays, I would imagine Port Melbourne would drop its rag at the very mention of that prospect. Still you look at arial photos of Melbourne and that would look amazing. Bring the city to the bay. Probably more likely that Docklands will develope and things string out along the Yarra or towards Footscray (dare I say its possible and will probably very soon the most fashionable place west of the city ... next to Williamstown of course!!) Still, I like the idea of the city stretching out to Port Melbourne better - but thats just my opinion.
Watch them build out towards Coode Island. I wouldn't want my flat to overlook that but it just be an excuse to move it out of town once and for all. Could probably never afford the move though. And how long do you all give Williamstown before god forbid something more than seven stories goes up there? Whats more likely? Williamstown loosen up and allow high rise or they go the totally historic tourist mecca route - pull down the council towers and forbid anything remotely modern looking at all. Freo - Melbourne style. Could be wise from a tourist angle. I always wished they had trams there linking up Newport, Yarraville and Footscray. Regardless of what Williamstown does it will always have a futuristic forest of skyscapers to look out on. Its what the view will from Port Melbourne that I question.
barneybuck February 7th, 2005, 03:07 AM I'd like to see a long row of middle-rise of buildings (a mini St Kilda road for condos & offices) stretching down along each side of light rail strip to Port Melbourne between Evans & Station Street. A sort of continuation of Melbourne City to the bay. Of course, as you pointed out above Tays, I would imagine Port Melbourne would drop its rag at the very mention of that prospect. Still you look at arial photos of Melbourne and that would look amazing. Bring the city to the bay. Probably more likely that Docklands will develope and things string out along the Yarra or towards Footscray (dare I say its possible and will probably very soon the most fashionable place west of the city ... next to Williamstown of course!!) Still, I like the idea of the city stretching out to Port Melbourne better - but thats just my opinion.
Watch them build out towards Coode Island. I wouldn't want my flat to overlook that but it just be an excuse to move it out of town once and for all. Could probably never afford the move though. And how long do you all give Williamstown before god forbid something more than seven stories goes up there? Whats more likely? Williamstown loosen up and allow high rise or they go the totally historic tourist mecca route - pull down the council towers and forbid anything remotely modern looking at all. Freo - Melbourne style. Could be wise from a tourist angle. I always wished they had trams there linking up Newport, Yarraville and Footscray. Regardless of what Williamstown does it will always have a futuristic forest of skyscapers to look out on. Its what the view will from Port Melbourne that I question.
Im with you on this one Williamstown should be left alone and yes if it was at all possible pull those bloody housing comm flats down. BTW the Strand shops are now being over run by tacky take away and fast food joints so I dont know how long it will keep its unique historic atmophere. sad really.
silvermb February 7th, 2005, 03:57 AM im pretty sure there wont be any more tall ones (over 60m/20st) along St Kilda rd.the planning dept has come down hard on these type of towers.
wow RDT is looking massive.
18-24 Dorcas st, approved 90m office tower
St Hilliers have bought the site next door on the old CH 7 studio and the above tower for a similar sized residential so the odd tower will sneak through above 60m provided its in the right spot. i hope they stick up another 100m residential next to the blank wall of Mayne HQ
Cat February 7th, 2005, 05:33 AM 18-24 Dorcas st, approved 90m office tower - silvermb
sorry if this is a dumb question but when was this approved and is it going to go ahead and will it impact the views from RDT. or will it be hidden by St James.
silvermb February 7th, 2005, 10:06 AM ^^ on the odd chance that it actually goes ahead as an office tower it'll be predominantly behind St James. should be reincarnated as a residential down the track though
CULWULLA February 28th, 2005, 12:21 PM approved DA applications have a shelf life in Sydney of just 2 years.if notning happens the DA is shelved and new applicant has to go through whole DA stage again. Sometimes thing s have changed and they might not be able to build what was formerly approved. Not sure what happens with DOI.
btw, its been 5 weeks since last piccies. anything recent.? im updating diagrams. just want to draw in current status. on jan24 ,it was 25floors completed and 27 in corebox. so maybe 4 more floors?
silvermb February 28th, 2005, 01:04 PM now draw...
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt 20050223.jpg
CULWULLA February 28th, 2005, 02:07 PM wow fantastic silver. your da man, its so massive.
it looks like lev28 to floor & 30 in core?
thankx
Grollo March 1st, 2005, 12:51 AM Fattest apartment tower in Australia? This thing would is huge even by office building standards. The lower level apartment floorplates measure 75m X 55m and have a floor area of 2500 square metres!!! The top floors measure 55m X 55m and an area of 2000 square metres and can be configured as one mega apartment!
Grollo March 1st, 2005, 12:53 AM Level 29, which is 2000 square metres sold for $8.5 million.
CULWULLA March 1st, 2005, 02:37 AM ^ I think it would have to be largest resi in oz? most are kept slim for sun access purposes.Its amzing how it was allowed to be so deep? thus the large units. if they were smaller units, the tower would have to be thinner.
in this pic what is uc to left?
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt%2020050223.jpg
Muse March 1st, 2005, 03:05 AM In the 2nd pic down CULWULLA? If so, it's Hallmark.
Here is a link of some construction pics silvermb took of it recently: St Kilda Rd (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=3386108#post3386108)
BTW Truly excellent pics silvermb. Fantastico!!
Blue_Copper March 1st, 2005, 12:07 PM i love this tower kinda looks like it has a westfield in it ass though
CULWULLA March 1st, 2005, 12:24 PM thanks muse, i forgot silver joins his pix.
CULWULLA March 5th, 2005, 11:23 AM RDT looked huge from Albert park GP today. This time next year it will be all done. As with Eureka and all the other dozen skyscrapers uc atm. should have an awesome skyline next GP! should be pretty well craneless too! so get your cams ready for completed pix.
mic March 5th, 2005, 11:27 AM Pretty well craneless?? LOL yep the BOOM is over-back to 1993
Dean March 5th, 2005, 11:40 AM ^^ Easy tiger... I dont think he meant it like that at all. I agree with him, that all the dozens of cranes are an eyesore atm, i just want all these massive projects completed so i can marvel at the finished products, and then get my arse up to the top of the Big E, and enjoy the view.
Chicks Love it!
Dean - Melbourne
Favco750 March 6th, 2005, 12:50 PM ^^ Easy tiger... I agree with him, that all the dozens of cranes are an eyesore atm, i just want all these massive projects completed
Dean - Melbourne
Pretty hard to complete without cranes. Eyesore my arse, they add to the skyline.
Dean March 6th, 2005, 01:35 PM Pretty hard to complete without cranes. Eyesore my arse, they add to the skyline.
Well i think you missed my point there chop. But anyway
Favco750 March 6th, 2005, 01:59 PM LOL :bleh: :banana: :cucumber: :carrot: :pepper: :banana2:
:wave: :hi: :laugh: :okay:
CULWULLA March 6th, 2005, 11:30 PM Pretty well craneless?? LOL yep the BOOM is over-back to 1993
i ment instead of 44 skyscrapers uc which peaked last year, next year there will be just 5. so it will be craneless. sort of.lol
kasperluke March 10th, 2005, 10:39 AM http://members.optusnet.com.au/lukekasper/RDT.jpg
plotstyle March 10th, 2005, 11:37 AM thats one phat mumma :)
Hacksaw March 12th, 2005, 03:43 AM Distance shot:
http://img37.exs.cx/img37/1522/p3120133edited3rf.jpg
tayser March 12th, 2005, 03:52 AM not long til it's the tallest on St. Kilda road!
lozza March 12th, 2005, 08:15 AM i cant get over how bulky this building is ! its going to be bloody massive once finished ! :rock:
cheer
lozza
sirbugalugs March 12th, 2005, 08:36 AM Even driving over the westgate now its a dominating presence.
Hacksaw March 12th, 2005, 12:47 PM http://img210.exs.cx/img210/673/P3120166.jpg
silvermb March 22nd, 2005, 12:22 PM remember all the debate about the podium, tays and his PT mates sooking that there were too many carparks. i think the podium will be the towers best feature, plenty of detail still to come
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt200503.jpg
CULWULLA March 22nd, 2005, 11:59 PM great pix guys.RDT is comin along fine. nearly up to height of Sebel Suits.
Grollo March 23rd, 2005, 12:03 AM Rendering of the podium:
http://www.winstruc.com/winport1/winport1_07c.jpg
Blue_Copper March 23rd, 2005, 03:32 AM love it!
Hacksaw March 24th, 2005, 09:09 AM http://img171.exs.cx/img171/6796/P3240286_edited.jpg
Muse March 24th, 2005, 02:54 PM silvermb and Hacksaw :okay:
In some of the pics posted by forumers in this thread, RDT's windows sometimes look green and sometimes a bluish aqua.
Nice to see the podium starting to be clad in the metallic material.
BTW Hallmark still hasn't topped out to its full 70m/230ft.
...
silvermb April 5th, 2005, 10:35 AM RDT from atop the Shrine, get up there and have a look around
i recall someone saying RDT ruins the view from the shrine, cant say i agree with that. it really does augment St James next door, they work off eachother well
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt200504.jpg
tayser April 5th, 2005, 10:52 AM facade's much better than I expected, yer.
pffft @ sooking. :D
Hacksaw April 13th, 2005, 03:14 PM http://img70.exs.cx/img70/2084/P4130503.jpg
uewepuep April 15th, 2005, 11:06 AM http://www.melbournephotos.net/pics/2005-04-15%20Melbourne%20-%20Rialto%20Obs%20deck%20and%20Construction/IMG_6424.jpg
CULWULLA April 15th, 2005, 02:03 PM fab shots guys! RDT looks like its equalled height of adjacent 120m st James! worked out level34 is in corebox. so another 10 floors to go.
cheers guys!
salamagd April 16th, 2005, 08:10 AM Yep, the core's definitely now higher than the top of St James when viewed from the city. Woo hoo! Tallest on St Kilda Road!
http://img91.echo.cx/img91/9669/sscrdt2sb.jpg
CULWULLA April 18th, 2005, 08:17 AM wow, moment in St Kilda Roads history.lol.
the 120m St James (originally built 1977 has been tallest for nearly 30 years surrenders to RDT.
skiesthelimit April 18th, 2005, 10:40 AM Hey Cul, when St James was built in 1977 how high did it rank in Melbournes scrapers? Must've been pretty high, I don't think Nauru/CP was built back then?
CULWULLA April 18th, 2005, 02:20 PM actually 1976 it was completed (just going over my records).It was 5th tallest in Melbourne!
Melbs tallest then was Nauru at 182m but wasnt yet opened.
next was-
Commonwealth bank-153m
BHP Hs-152m
Marland House-121m
St James (St Kilda)120m
MLC (303 collins)-120m (antenna-150m)
AMP Square-113m
500 collins st-106m
skiesthelimit April 19th, 2005, 05:48 AM Thx for the cul! I gotta say it looks better than most of the 70's 'commin block' style architecture that was so popular around the time! You could easily mistake it for a building done in the 90s!
Erektion April 19th, 2005, 06:05 AM From memory it wasn't like this when finished. In fact, I think the reno's were done in the 90's???
CULWULLA April 19th, 2005, 06:23 AM ^ thats correct. it was a typical 1970's office bldg up until 1997-8, when it was refitted to resi use, which ment new facade ect.
in its hey day.
http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-vn3413629-v.jpg
St Kildas first really tall bldg-BP bldg 1964
http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-vn3314521-v.jpg
Erektion April 19th, 2005, 06:30 AM It's a bit off the topic, but a few years back the rooftop penthouse won Australian apartment of the year. Wish I'd kept the magazine...it's a stunning fitout. Ultra modern and very gallery like. One day...
Grollo April 19th, 2005, 09:03 AM There have been a few chnages since this pic was taken :-)
http://www.pierluigisurace.it/imagerie/images/aatw/DOT_Aus_Melbourne_Arts_Centre_01.jpg
CULWULLA April 19th, 2005, 12:49 PM Arts spire was only 115m back then.
jag April 21st, 2005, 12:01 PM ^ thats correct. it was a typical 1970's office bldg up until 1997-8, when it was refitted to resi use, which ment new facade ect.
in its hey day.
http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-vn3413629-v.jpg
St Kildas first really tall bldg-BP bldg 1964
http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-vn3314521-v.jpg
Yep and I am proud to say its the biggest building so far I had to audit for hazmat before the strip out and refit.
Barsby April 27th, 2005, 05:13 AM http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/barsby/DSCN1525.jpg
CULWULLA April 27th, 2005, 01:27 PM cool, so big for a resi tower. looks like lev36 in corbx!
thanx
silvermb May 14th, 2005, 01:28 AM fark it looks the part from Kings Way. the podium is pretty good
http://silvermb.thehoddlegrid.net/rdt 200505.jpg
tayser May 14th, 2005, 03:27 AM myeah, better.
Adam from Oz May 14th, 2005, 09:43 PM Just looks fat and boxy to me!
Big deal!
Cheers,
Adam
lozza May 15th, 2005, 05:34 AM Shit, i cant believe how bulky and wide this building is ! It looks like it could easily be 60 stories tall ! I hope its not going to look stumpy and too short for its width like Melbourne Central ?? :rant: :bash: :dj:
Cheers :cheers:
Lozza :rock:
Muse May 15th, 2005, 07:41 AM Guys, this was never going to be a particularly *attractive* tower. After the sleeker zenmedia design was tossed aside and the sphere was cut from atop the current design, it was a foregone conclusion, a given.
Then those eastern elevation ads followed in The Age. No real render ever appeared in those.
I think the developers always knew they weren't on a winning design here (for what they wanted to niche market to the upper echelon/s of society).
Looks like they might be cost-cutting on the base too. The hoardings are being whisked away, but no sign of the corner "artistic" piece covering the parking levels as yet. Unless that is still to come :?
However, funny enough, I'm still liking it so far, for what it is - a safe urban design for a metro area.
CULWULLA October 11th, 2005, 01:08 AM ........
|
|