hkskyline
December 6th, 2005, 04:34 AM
Scientists unveil new discoveries from Titanic wreck
5 December 2005
FALMOUTH, Mass. (AP) - The discovery of two large pieces of the Titanic's hull on the ocean floor has changed the story of its final minutes, indicating the ocean liner's end was more quick and terrifying than previously thought, underwater researchers said Monday.
The hull pieces were a crucial part of the ship's structure and make up a bottom section that was missing when the wreck was first located in 1985, they said.
After these key sections of the hull broke free, the bow and stern spilt, said Roger Long, a naval architect who analyzed the find. The stern, which was still buoyant and filled with survivors, likely plunged toward the ocean floor about five minutes later, giving passengers less time to escape than widely believed.
"It would have been immediately terrifying," he said. "The breakup determined whether a lot of people lived or died."
Researchers previously believed the ship broke in just two major pieces, the bow and stern, which was how the sinking was depicted in the 1997 film version of the catastrophe. And David Brown, a Titanic historian, had estimated prior to the find that the stern took 20 minutes to slide into the water, based on how quickly it would have filled with water.
"It turns out the Titanic was more merciful. It was over more quickly," Brown said.
The hull sections were examined during an expedition in August sponsored by The History Channel. On Monday, Titanic experts converged on Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution to discuss for the first time their analysis of the find for a documentary to be aired on the cable channel on Feb. 26.
The sections, both about 40 feet by 90 feet, were once a single section and were found in good condition, with red bottom paint still visible. The missing sections had been believed to have fragmented into hundreds of small pieces.
"The breakup and sinking of the Titanic has never been accurately depicted," said Parks Stephenson, a Titanic historian who took part in Monday's conference.
The 46,000-ton ocean liner was billed as "practically unsinkable" by the publicity magazines of the period. But it struck an iceberg on its maiden voyage and sank about two and a half hours later, on April 14, 1912. About 1,500 people were killed.
Explorer Robert Ballard found the bulk of the wreck in 1985, at a depth of 13,000 feet and about 380 miles southeast of Newfoundland. Ballard was not impressed with the expedition's find. "They found a fragment, big deal," he said. "Am I surprised? No. When you go down there, there's stuff all over the place. It hit an iceberg and it sank. Get over it."
The two hull pieces were found about 500 meters from the stern of the wreck.
Scientists on Monday said the hull pieces provided significant clues about why the Titantic sank after striking the iceberg.
"What we assumed was it broke up because it sank," Brown said. "Now we know it sank because it broke up."
Long offered a hypothesis, based on his study of reports on the accident and signs of compression and tension in the metal on the new pieces.
Long described a relatively slow submersion, with the Titanic remaining relatively stable before a crack split the ship down to the hull. The hull remained intact for a while longer, but finally snapped under the pressure of water flooding into the ship and the resulting pulls and tugs on the Titanic's hull.
Stephenson said many of those on board the Titanic may have expected the ship to remain afloat for several hours. At the time, ships such as the Titanic were built to remain afloat long enough for rescuers to arrive. Life boats were called "transfer boats," reflecting the mindset that rescue would come with transfer to another vessel.
Some people would have remained on board, expecting the Titanic to be safer than a small boat in a frigid sea. Stephenson said survivors on lifeboats said they expected to return to the Titanic to pick up more survivors.
Researchers said the apparent failure of the Titanic's hull, as revealed in the discovery, is not a reflection of the ship's engineering.
Stephenson the ship endured "unimaginable loads" before succumbing.
"It's not the fault here of design," he said. "The Titanic tragedy was caused because the ship was moving through a known ice field at full speed."
5 December 2005
FALMOUTH, Mass. (AP) - The discovery of two large pieces of the Titanic's hull on the ocean floor has changed the story of its final minutes, indicating the ocean liner's end was more quick and terrifying than previously thought, underwater researchers said Monday.
The hull pieces were a crucial part of the ship's structure and make up a bottom section that was missing when the wreck was first located in 1985, they said.
After these key sections of the hull broke free, the bow and stern spilt, said Roger Long, a naval architect who analyzed the find. The stern, which was still buoyant and filled with survivors, likely plunged toward the ocean floor about five minutes later, giving passengers less time to escape than widely believed.
"It would have been immediately terrifying," he said. "The breakup determined whether a lot of people lived or died."
Researchers previously believed the ship broke in just two major pieces, the bow and stern, which was how the sinking was depicted in the 1997 film version of the catastrophe. And David Brown, a Titanic historian, had estimated prior to the find that the stern took 20 minutes to slide into the water, based on how quickly it would have filled with water.
"It turns out the Titanic was more merciful. It was over more quickly," Brown said.
The hull sections were examined during an expedition in August sponsored by The History Channel. On Monday, Titanic experts converged on Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution to discuss for the first time their analysis of the find for a documentary to be aired on the cable channel on Feb. 26.
The sections, both about 40 feet by 90 feet, were once a single section and were found in good condition, with red bottom paint still visible. The missing sections had been believed to have fragmented into hundreds of small pieces.
"The breakup and sinking of the Titanic has never been accurately depicted," said Parks Stephenson, a Titanic historian who took part in Monday's conference.
The 46,000-ton ocean liner was billed as "practically unsinkable" by the publicity magazines of the period. But it struck an iceberg on its maiden voyage and sank about two and a half hours later, on April 14, 1912. About 1,500 people were killed.
Explorer Robert Ballard found the bulk of the wreck in 1985, at a depth of 13,000 feet and about 380 miles southeast of Newfoundland. Ballard was not impressed with the expedition's find. "They found a fragment, big deal," he said. "Am I surprised? No. When you go down there, there's stuff all over the place. It hit an iceberg and it sank. Get over it."
The two hull pieces were found about 500 meters from the stern of the wreck.
Scientists on Monday said the hull pieces provided significant clues about why the Titantic sank after striking the iceberg.
"What we assumed was it broke up because it sank," Brown said. "Now we know it sank because it broke up."
Long offered a hypothesis, based on his study of reports on the accident and signs of compression and tension in the metal on the new pieces.
Long described a relatively slow submersion, with the Titanic remaining relatively stable before a crack split the ship down to the hull. The hull remained intact for a while longer, but finally snapped under the pressure of water flooding into the ship and the resulting pulls and tugs on the Titanic's hull.
Stephenson said many of those on board the Titanic may have expected the ship to remain afloat for several hours. At the time, ships such as the Titanic were built to remain afloat long enough for rescuers to arrive. Life boats were called "transfer boats," reflecting the mindset that rescue would come with transfer to another vessel.
Some people would have remained on board, expecting the Titanic to be safer than a small boat in a frigid sea. Stephenson said survivors on lifeboats said they expected to return to the Titanic to pick up more survivors.
Researchers said the apparent failure of the Titanic's hull, as revealed in the discovery, is not a reflection of the ship's engineering.
Stephenson the ship endured "unimaginable loads" before succumbing.
"It's not the fault here of design," he said. "The Titanic tragedy was caused because the ship was moving through a known ice field at full speed."