View Full Version : USA/UK test prototype electromagnetic weapon


sjwmoore
January 3rd, 2006, 03:40 PM
The UK Ministry of Defence and US Department of Defense have jointly tested an MBDA-developed radio frequency demonstrator that could be used as a warhead for cruise missiles or as a reusable weapon for carriage by unmanned air vehicles during attacks on command and control networks.

Photographs of the repetitive-pulse radio-frequency weapon were released by the US Naval Surface Warfare Center’s (NAVSEA) Dahlgren division at last month’s IDGA Directed Energy Weapons conference in Washington DC. The images indicate a capacitor-powered signal generator enclosed within a horizontally aligned antenna array.

Two technical demonstrations have been conducted since late 1999 using a NAVSEA open air electromagnetic test facility.

The first involved a weapon fitted beneath a surrogate UAV body replicating the Northrop Grumman BQM-145. The weapon was suspended from a crane above a building equipped as a command and control installation.

NAVSEA imagery indicates that the prototype weapon was roughly 2m (6.5ft) long with a diameter of around 0.5m, although concept drawings prepared by MBDA and included in the NAVSEA presentation indicate a more advanced version could be integrated within the nose of a BQM-145.

The second test series was conducted between late 2004 and early 2005, the company says.

Richard Moran, counter-radio frequency programme manager in NAVSEA’s Directed Energy Technology Office, says that the core concept for both test campaigns was to have “something flying by a C4I [command, control, computers, communications and intelligence] site radiating radio frequency and taking out the computer system”. He says that the test weapon involved was an MBDA proprietary product.

MBDA declines to comment on its radio-frequency weapon activities, instead directing questions to the UK MoD.

While the company has previously listed radio-frequency and high-power microwave weapons as possible future payload options for its Storm Shadow/Scalp EG cruise missiles, it has never acknowledged an active research and development programme.

Day Release
January 3rd, 2006, 03:52 PM
Happy New Year sjw :okay:

Good news on the high tech UAV and cruise front, future capabilities will be much greater than those at present :wink2:

sjwmoore
January 3rd, 2006, 04:18 PM
and a happy new year to you as well, DR!!..

I am intrigued as to the reusable idea, ie the missile flies past the command post, wrecks their systems, and can then return to friendly lines!

Peyre
January 5th, 2006, 12:59 PM
Anyone heard of this forcefield thingy that will be put on warriors to stop RPG attacks. I'll try and find me source

Northerner
January 5th, 2006, 04:27 PM
Anyone heard of this forcefield thingy that will be put on warriors to stop RPG attacks. I'll try and find me source

I have found this telegraph.co.uk (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2002%2F08%2F19%2Fnmod19.xml)

sjwmoore
January 5th, 2006, 04:47 PM
Thats quite something! The inner layer of current armour is reputed to be a high temperature resistant ceramic, as on the Space shuttle tiles, but this is real sci fi stuff!

Peyre
January 5th, 2006, 10:53 PM
Thats the one, sounds sweet :D

Lance
January 8th, 2006, 03:06 PM
It's not really that sci-fi. Basically fighting fire with hotter fire. Pretty useless against other types of ammunition, but good against things like rpg's because of the way the warhead explodes.

SJW, I think the re-usable idea was for the UAV's.... more like a gun.... when the missile would be more of a warhead idea.

nick_taylor
January 11th, 2006, 07:08 PM
I would have loved to have seen that forcefield in action. What next War of the World tripods anyone? :laugh:

http://ffmedia.ign.com/filmforce/image/article/635/635991/war-of-the-worlds-20050722055101768.jpg

nick_taylor
January 11th, 2006, 07:44 PM
Even better - replace the army with thousands of these....


http://www.bollywoodscreensavers.com/wallpapers/movies/imgs/terminator02.jpg

London_2006
January 11th, 2006, 10:08 PM
And when there is an accidental friendly fire incident, the EMP blast will wipe out your entire army at once.

nick_taylor
January 11th, 2006, 11:48 PM
Not if they all have anti-EMP fields. ;)

Lance
January 11th, 2006, 11:59 PM
then we will have to have anti-anti-EMP bombs so the EMP wont be antied by the anti-EMP fields.

nick_taylor
January 12th, 2006, 02:10 AM
Then the robots and machines would be constructed of a polymer body with the durability, strength, lightness and flexibility of the strongest metal alloys. ;)

London_2006
January 12th, 2006, 02:12 AM
Although during upgrading the armour, someone will forget to reprogram the anti-EMP field, and the whole cycle will start over.

Lance
January 12th, 2006, 03:49 AM
Seriously though.... sod bombing the crap out of them.... howz a legion of T-800's for shock and awe!!! Eat that Kim Jong Il.

nick_taylor
January 15th, 2006, 02:24 PM
Oh and of course we'd need Hunter-Killer's - the size of office buildings, kinda like larger and more powerful versions of the Predator drones we have today. :D


http://monkeydelimeats2.tripod.com/hkwater.jpg