View Full Version : LONDON | Projects & Construction


Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

wjfox
February 7th, 2006, 12:11 AM
http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/london-fullsummaryofprojects.jpg


Click here (http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=44279904) to view scale diagrams of each tower.
Click here (http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/ms?hl=en&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=110643539260211601274.000462bfd3e14fe703490&ll=51.506511,-0.090508&spn=0.054812,0.154495&z=13) for the locations displayed in Google Maps
SkyscraperCity videos (http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=skyscrapercityvideos) - our very own YouTube channel.


Previous London summary threads:
1 | 2 | 3 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=230639) | 4 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=266031) | 5 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=291141) | 6 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=311029) | 7 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=334869) | 8 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=350187) | 9 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=377643) | 10 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=413465) | 11 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=446250) | 12 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=483225) | 13 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=529122) | 14 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=580666) | 15 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=21976351) | 16 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=735222) | 17 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=857760)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



London Bridge Tower - the "Shard of Glass"
Southwark

Height: 310m | Floors: 72 | Architect: Renzo Piano | Developer: Sellar Property Group

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=407549) | Official website (http://www.shardlondonbridge.com/) | Renzo Piano Building Workshop (http://www.rpbw.com) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=46) | Station redevelopment (http://www.tpbennett.co.uk/project.aspx?siteid=2&projectid=13)

Notes:

This landmark tower will be the first building in the UK to break the 1000 foot barrier. It will be nearly twice the height of the Gherkin,
and one of the tallest buildings in Europe.
London's first truly "mixed use" tower, the floors will be divided (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=25998656&postcount=3645) into a mixture of residential, office, hotel, retail and public space.
Following the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the tower was structurally redesigned to improve stability and reduce evacuation times.
The tower went through a lengthy public inquiry. It was approved by the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on 19th November 2003.
The total cost of the project is in excess of £1.2bn and includes major refurbishment of the neighbouring train and bus stations.
The tower has two main tenants lined up - Shangri-La Hotels (http://www.shangri-la.com/en/property/london/shangrila), who will be occupying floors 34-52 - and Transport for London (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=595) who will
take some of the office space.
Financial issues plagued the tower for years, but were resolved in 2008 when four Qatari banks took an 80% stake
in the project (buying-out both CLS and Simon Halabi). All funding and contracts were subsequently secured.

Current Status:
Under construction! The core is due to begin rising in late November according to this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WYKyCrK9tM).
The tower will be topped-out in late 2010 and is scheduled for practical completion by May 2012.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/46TheShard_pic2.jpg





Bishopsgate Tower - "The Pinnacle"
The City

Height: 288m | Floors: 63 | Architect: Kohn Pederson Fox | Developer: Union Investment Real Estate AG (formerly known as DIFA)

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=375557) | Bishopsgate Tower promotional video (23mb) (http://realestate.union-investment.com/downloads/difa/6578b558d68b03dfb3ee75ca8ece8f0d.0.0/tbt_en_large.mov) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=2839)

Notes:

At 288 metres, the Bishopsgate Tower will form the centrepiece of London’s financial district. It will be over 100 metres taller than
the City's current tallest building, Tower 42 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_42).
Plans for a tower on this site have been around since 2002. A previous design (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=89) by Helmut Jahn was scrapped following concerns over
the base and crown, and its effect on views from Fleet Street. The revised design - by architects Kohn Pederson Fox - is more
sleek and elegantly proportioned, and is intended to complement the neighbouring proposals such as the Leadenhall Building.
A planning application was submitted in June 2005. A revised planning application with a 19m height reduction was submitted
and given final approval in April 2006. In November 2006, the developers secured funding for the project from Arab Investments.
The full planning report for the tower can be accessed by clicking here (http://www.minutes.org.uk/cgi-bin/cgi003.exe?Y,,,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,90,2001,City+of+London,REPORT,london,Planning+and+Transportation+Committee,BROWSE,,,,,,,,,,25.04.06,985850937,986879029,1,000000085967,1,1,1,P,29181892,0,00,00,N).

Current Status:
Piling is complete. Keltbray are back on site, to complete demo of the basement levels of the previous building, and to complete the
enabling works. Construction of the basements for the new building will then follow. The core and superstructure won't rise above ground
until late 2010.

Despite the long wait, it seems highly likely that this tower will eventually be built. The final contract (for the concrete) will be awarded
shortly. All of the retail space has been let, plus over 25% of the office space, and the four restaurant floors at the top.

Topping-out is scheduled for late 2012, and the building is due to open in 2013.


http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/bishopsgatetower/11.jpg





Heron Tower
The City

Height: 246m (202m roof + 44m spire) | Floors: 47 | Architect: Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates | Developer: Heron International PLC

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=413356) | Skanska project page with news updates (http://www.skanska.co.uk/herontower) | Mayor Ken Livingstone's comments (http://www.london.gov.uk/view_press_release.jsp?releaseid=1324) | Architects' website (http://www.kpf.com)

Notes:

Following concerns from English Heritage about its impact on St Paul's and other historic views, Heron Tower was put through
a public inquiry. The inquiry ruled in favour of the developers, and the tower was approved on 22nd July 2002 by the Deputy
Prime Minister, John Prescott. He agreed with the planning inspector that no significant harm would come to the setting of
St Paul's cathedral and that some marginal impact on heritage interests was "inevitable with any major development".
He acknowledged that the tower would be "an elegant, graceful and well proportioned structure" and would contribute to the
overall supply of office accommodation in the City, as well as boosting the economy.
The scheme includes an additional smaller tower of around 100m, immediately adjacent to the main building's north side.
This is Heron Plaza (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=682) and will include 250,000 sq ft of retail space.

Current Status:
Under construction! The tower recently passed the 150m mark. For more information see the construction schedule (http://www.planning.cityoflondon.gov.uk:90/WAM/doc/Page-7?extension=.pdf&page=7&wmTransparency=0&id=104915&wmLocation=0&location=livevolume1&contentType=application%2Fpdf&wmName=&pageCount=129).


http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/heron/5.jpg





Columbus Tower
Canary Wharf

Height: 237m | Floors: 65 | Architect: DMWR Architects | Developer: Commercial Estates Group

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=270065) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=47)

Notes:

This is a massive hotel and residential scheme for a site just outside the Canary Wharf estate.
If built, it would become the tallest building in the Docklands - overtaking both 1 Canada Square and Riverside South.
The crown of the building has been deliberately designed to evoke the Thames Flood Barrier.

Current Status:
This project has been floating around for many years. Planning permission was renewed in October 2009, following the intervention
of Boris Johnson. It is unclear when construction will begin. However, the current buildings on site are leased for the next few years
which could delay things further.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/47ColumbusTower_pic1.jpg





Riverside South
Canary Wharf

Height: 236m and 189m | Floors: 45 and 37 | Architect: Richard Rogers | Developer: Canary Wharf Group

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=10431727) | Rogers Stirk Harbour & Partners - project detail (http://www.rsh-p.com/work/all_projects/canary_wharf_riverside_south/design) (note - this features the older design) | SkyscraperNews listing - tower 1 (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=53) | SkyscraperNews listing - tower 2 (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=261)

Notes:

The tallest tower was given a height increase, making it structurally taller than 1 Canada Square (but shorter by AOD height).
In terms of floorspace, this will be the largest single office development in Europe - over 3 million square feet.
JP Morgan were secured as tenants in August 2008.

Current Status:
Under construction!. Work on the basements recently started, after a long period of excavation and piling.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/53RiversideSouth1_pic1.jpg





The Leadenhall Building
The City

Height: 225m | Floors: 48 | Architect: Richard Rogers | Developer: British Land PLC

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=415718) | British Land development page (http://www.britishland.com/devleadenhall.htm) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=49)

Notes:

This tower is designed by Richard Rogers, the man behind Lloyds of London, the Dome, and the Pompidou Centre in Paris.
Despite its height, the building has a relatively small amount of floorspace (500,000 sq ft), due to its unusual profile
which means the floorplates gradually decrease the higher up it goes.
The base will feature a 90 ft high atrium, extending the public area of St Helens and providing shelter from the elements.
Glass lifts will carry employees up the outside of the building, similar to those on the Lloyds Building only twice as high.
Click here (http://www.minutes.org.uk/cgi-bin/cgi003.exe?Y,,,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,90,0,Corporation+of+London,REPORT,london,Planning+and+Transportation+Committee,BROWSE,,,,,,,,,,26.10.04,739171025,740078527,1,000000079731,1,1,1,P,60741610,0,00,00,N) to view the full planning report from the Corporation of London.



Current Status:
All construction work, including the basements, has been halted due to the economic downturn. According to one reliable source,
this tower will likely be delayed for several years; possibly even cancelled altogether and replaced with a smaller project.


http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/122leadenhall/1.jpg





North Quay
Canary Wharf

Height: 216m/203m/120m | Floors: 44/38/18 | Architect: Cesar Pelli | Developer: Canary Wharf Group

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=432400) | Architect's website (http://www.pcparch.com/) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=51)

Notes:

This trio of towers would be situated on a 7-acre site at the northern edge of the Canary Wharf estate. Previously known
as "Shed 35", the site was sold to Canary Wharf Group with planning permission for a mixed-use development.
In total, the North Quay scheme will provide over 4 million sq ft of floorspace for retail and offices.
Development is likely to take place after the completion of the Churchill Place and Riverside South districts.
However, there could be further delays in the form of Crossrail (see below).

Current Status:
Approved, but unlikely to rise until 2017 or even later. The main problem lies with Crossrail (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossrail), part of which is going
to run directly underneath the towers. The economic downturn is another factor.


http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/northquay/3.jpg





City Pride
Canary Wharf

Height: 209m | Floors: 61 | Architect: Norman Foster & Partners | Developer: Glenkerinn UK

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=613565) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=5556)

Notes:

This massive residential skyscraper is planned by developer Glenkerrin, on the site of a pub in the Docklands. The site was bought for £32m.
In terms of floor count, only the Shard and Pinnacle will be higher.
The tower has faced considerable opposition from local residents.

Current Status:
Approved in April 2009. Construction may start in 2010.


http://i33.tinypic.com/2142wk5.jpg





Wood Wharf
Canary Wharf

Height: 200m/187m/182m/154m | Floors: Various | Architect: Richard Rogers Partnership | Developer: British Waterways & Canary Wharf Group

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=317626) | Official website (http://www.woodwharf.com/)

Notes:

Wood Wharf is one of the largest urban projects in London. It will lead to the redevelopment of a huge, largely derelict area
to the immediate east of Canary Wharf. This will be a mixed-use scheme, with 3.5 million square feet of office space and around
1,500 homes along with retail, leisure and hotels. The office space would effectively be a seamless expansion of the Canary Wharf
business district, albeit not officially part of the Canary Wharf estate.
The development includes four skyscrapers of 200m, 187m, 182m, 154m and a number of smaller buildings.

Current Status:
The final masterplan was approved in October 2008. The entire development is expected to take around 10 years to build.


http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/woodwharf/1.jpg





Heron Quays West
Canary Wharf

Height: 198m/147m/95m | Floors: 33/21/12 | Architect: Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners | Developer: Canary Wharf Group

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=459295)

Notes:

This trio of office towers would be built to the immediate west of the Heron Quays buildings.
Together, they would add nearly 200,000 square metres of internal floorspace space to the Canary Wharf estate,
including the largest trading floors in Europe (7,962 sq m, compared with 6,673 sq m for the current record holder in the City).

Current Status:
Approved in March 2008. It is unclear when construction will begin.


http://i44.tinypic.com/10fw87d.jpg





1 Park Place
Canary Wharf

Height: 197m | Floors: 45 | Architect: Horden Cherry Lee | Developer: Grattan Property Company Ltd

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=573330) | Architect's website (http://www.hcla.co.uk/projects/?prorub1=ap&prorub2=1&pid=129)

Notes:

This will stand just to the east of the Riverside South towers.
The tower's height is 191m to the roof, but includes a facade overrun going up to 197m.

Current Status:
The tower was approved in August 2008. It is unclear when construction will begin.


http://i37.tinypic.com/2dhihxz.jpg





St George Tower
Lambeth

Height: 181m | Floors: 49 | Architect: Broadway Malyan | Developer: St George

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=221585) | Broadway Malyan (http://www.broadwaymalyan.com/projects/sustainability/vauxhall-tower.cfm) | Official website (http://www.number1-thetower.co.uk/) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=119)

Notes:

If built, this would be the tallest all-residential tower in the UK and one of the tallest in Europe.
Energy efficiency is one of the project's most important features. The structure is topped by a wind turbine, which
will power the common lighting. At the base, water will be drawn from the London Aquifer and heat pump technology
will be used to remove warmth from the water in the winter to heat the apartments. The tower will require one-third
of the energy compared to a similar building and CO2 release will be between one half and two-thirds of normal
emissions. It will be triple glazed to minimise heat loss and gain, with low ‘e’ glazing and ventilated blinds between
the glazing to further reduce heat gain.

Current Status:
Approved (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/londonnews/articles/17731809?source=Evening%20Standard ), following a public inquiry. It is unclear when construction will begin.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/119StGeorgeWharfTower_pic6.jpg





100 Bishopsgate
The City

Height: 165m | Floors: 40 | Architect: Allies and Morrison | Developer: Great Portland Estates

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=354677) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=2069)

Notes:

This tower would stand on a site immediately to the south of the Heron Tower. If viewed from Waterloo Bridge, it would be
obscured by Tower 42.
Construction is unlikely to start until 2011 (see below).

Current Status:
This was approved in April 2007. However, the current site lease runs until early 2011.


http://i32.tinypic.com/alkck9.jpg





1 Blackfriars Road - "Mirax-Beetham Tower"
Southwark SE1

Height: 163m | Floors: 52 | Architect: Ian Simpson Architects | Developer: Beetham Organization

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=400279) | Exhibition photos and information (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=10065942&postcount=560) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=1524)

Notes:

Originally proposed at 70 floors/220m, this has twice been reduced in height, and the footprint has shrunk.
A public viewing gallery will be located on the top floor, offering stunning views across the capital.
The building will feature a 6-star Jumeirah hotel and luxury apartments, each with their own internal conservatory space.


Current Status:
Approved in March 2009 following a lengthy public inquiry. The neighbouring 20 Blackfriars Road towers were also approved.
Construction is believed to be getting underway in 2010.


http://i26.tinypic.com/vi36ua.jpg





Northgate Tower (Bishops Place)
Hackney/City border

Height: 161m/126m | Floors: 51/35 | Architect: Foster & Partners | Developer: Hammerson

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=431133) | Technical drawings (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=17301182&postcount=215) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/bdbsearch.php?qns=Bishops+Place&x=0&y=0)

Notes:

This is a major mixed-use scheme on the City/Hackney border, immediately adjacent to the Broadgate Tower.
Originally, it was intended that a historic pub, the Light Bar, would be demolished. However, following a campaign by
local residents, along with objections from CABE, this was saved and incorporated into the plans.

Current Status:
The developers hope to receive planning permission by next March. After substantial enabling works (due to nearby rail lines),
the residential tower should be U/C by mid-2012.


http://i28.tinypic.com/fmlzf4.jpg





Odalisk
Croydon

Height: 160m/100m (estimated) | Floors: 51/31 | Architect: CZWG Architects | Developer: Guildhouse-Rosepride

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=580546) | Skyscrapernews article (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=1778)

Notes:

This is a major mixed-use scheme planned for Croydon. Tower 1 is 100m and contains hotel/residential space,
while tower 2 is 160m and will contain residential/office space.
If built, it would be one of the tallest buildings in South London.

Current Status:
Originally submitted for planning in 2008, this has now gone back to the pre-planning/consultation stage.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/5700OdaliskTower1_pic1.jpg





20 Fenchurch Street - the "Walkie Talkie"
The City

Height: 160m | Floors: 36 | Architect: Rafael Vinoly | Developer: Land Securities

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=321409) | Official website (http://www.20fenchurchstreet.co.uk) | Skyscrapernews listing (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=4683)

Notes:

This project replaces a 91m tower from the 1960s. It involved a very lengthy demolition process (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JDZ37CWVW4).
Opinions are very divided on this tower's unusual design. Following criticism about its height and impact on the views
of St Pauls Cathedral, it was reduced by 9 floors, from 45 to 36. It subsequently went throgh a public inquiry
(the 4th London skyscraper to go through this process), and was finally approved in July 2007. The full planning report
can be accessed here (http://www.minutes.org.uk/cgi-bin/cgi003.exe?Y,,,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,90,2001,City+of+London,REPORT,london,Planning+and+Transportation+Committee,BROWSE,,,,,,,,,,19.09.06,1037721683,1038857296,1,000000087385,1,1,1,P,92873738,0,00,00,N).

Current Status:
Demolition and site preparation was completed in June 2009. However, Land Securities won't proceed with
construction until the market picks up.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/468320FenchurchStreet_pic9.jpg





Crossharbour - "Baltimore Wharf"
Tower Hamlets

Height: 150m | Floors: 45 | Architect: Skidmore Owings & Merrill | Developer: Ballymore Properties Ltd

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=335477)

Notes:

This major residential development would stand to the south-east of the Canary Wharf cluster.
It has gone through a series of design changes, at one point being proposed at 170m. This latest version is 150m.
It will contain 330 flats, plus retail units at ground level.
The development includes some neighbouring low-rise buildings, in addition to the main tower.

Current Status:
Approved in July 2008. The neighbouring low-rise buildings have been under construction for some time now. However, it is
unclear when the tower itself will start to rise.


http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/5547CrossharbourPhase2Building1_pic3.jpg





Merchant Square
Westminster

Height: 150m | Floors: 44 | Architect: Perkins & Will | Developer: Paddington Development Corporation Limited

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=316953) | Official website (http://www.merchantsquare.co.uk)

Notes:

This residential development, planned for a site on Harbet Road in Paddington, will contain a total of 223 apartments,
68 units of which are affordable housing that will occupy the lowest ten floors of the scheme.
Several other buildings are planned as part of Merchant Square, ranging in height from 49-66m.

Current Status:
Planning permission was granted for buildings D (52m) and E (63m) in May 2007, and for buildings C (66m) B (65m) and F (49m)
in June 2007. The tallest building (150m) was approved in July 2007 and work is expected to begin on site in the near future.




http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/merchantsquare/1.jpg





Vauxhall Bondway Tower
Lambeth

Height: 150m | Floors: 42 | Architect: Make | Developer: London & Regional

Links: Forum thread (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=886862) | Skyscrapernews page (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=1523) | Planning application (http://planning.lambeth.gov.uk/publicaccess/tdc/DcApplication/application_detailview.aspx?caseno=KJU7K0BO0GL00&searchtype=WEEKLY)

Notes:

This project has been floating around for several years. It was originally believed to be 180m. The new height is 150m.
This is a residential tower and would join the nearby St George Wharf Tower.
It could be difficult to gain planning permission, given the current Mayor's policies.

Current Status:
Proposed in May 2009.


http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa278/fit3xl/VBOND1.jpg





Other Projects (various)

This includes all 'midrise' buildings under 150m. Also listed are any other schemes worth mentioning, such as long term projects,
towers in pre-planning, or rumoured but unconfirmed schemes. Projects highlighted in red are under construction. Here they are,
in descending order of height:


Project Three Houses (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=787222). A trio of snaking towers with heights of 250m, 200m and 100m that would stand to the south-east
of London Bridge Tower. This mixed-use development is being designed by architects Herzog & de Meuron.


Whitgift Centre redevelopment (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=579524). A major redevelopment of this prominent site in Croydon, South London. The developers have
hinted at a possible 60-storey tower.


Bishopsgate Goods Yard (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=430856). Ballymore are planning a major redevelopment of this prominent site, at the northern edge of the City.
Early indications are that it will include towers of 200m+ and a number of surrounding midrises. This could form a cluster with
the Broadgate Tower and the Northgate Tower.


Market Tower redevelopment (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=866006). Possible 170m and 155m towers for Vauxhall.


Cherry Orchard Road Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=449575). A series of four distinctive towers for East Croydon including a 160m skyscraper. However, the current scheme
faces a redesign and most likely a substantial reduction in height.


Sugar House (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=495494). A major development for Stratford which includes a tower similar in appearance to 122 Leadenhall.
Early indications are that the height will be 159m/40 storeys.


Broadgate Centre redevelopment (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=747). British Land have plans for a massive redevelopment in this prime location next to
Liverpool Street station, potentially adding over 1.2 million square feet of floorspace. The leases on some of the buildings
in the Broadgate Centre are due to expire in the next few years, and space is rapidly running out in the estate. Taking advantage
of changes in the viewing corridors to St Paul's cathedral, they have hinted at the possibility of much taller buildings on some of
the existing sites, perhaps as high as 150m/35 storeys. These new offices would join the Broadgate Tower literally next door.
Any construction is unlikely to start until the next property cycle in 2011-2012, however.


Dollar Bay Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=934424). A possible mixed-use scheme for the eastern end of Canary Wharf. 46-48 storeys.


Strata ( http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=289065) (formerly the Multiplex Tower). This residential tower was approved in March 2006 as part of the Elephant & Castle
redevelopment. It began construction in December 2007 and is 147m tall.


Minerva Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=498957). Minerva are planning a "new urban quarter” for Wandsworth on the site of the former Young’s Ram brewery.
The ERP-designed scheme will comprise 700 flats spread across two residential towers of 39 and 29 storeys and
a mix of low-rise homes, restaurants, shops and a microbrewery. Height of the taller tower would be 146m.


22 Marsh Wall - "The Landmark" (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=387926). A pair of major residential towers for the Docklands, located on the south-western
edge of the cluster, opposite Riverside South. 140m/44 storeys and 98m/30 storeys.


151 City Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=445920). This prominent site just north of the City was to have featured a striking, colourful tower designed by Will Alsop.
However, a "less ambitious scheme" will now be proposed because of the economic climate. Height of the previous scheme
would have been 140m/43 storeys.


Doon Street Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=349637). A residential tower for the South Bank. Previously 168m, but reduced in height following complaints from
English Heritage. Approved in August 2008 following a public inquiry. New height is 140m/43 storeys.


New Providence Wharf Building C (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=395444). Ballymore are planning a neighbour for the Ontario Tower. Designed by Skidmore,
Owings & Merrill, it will be 136m/44 storeys. Groundwork began in November 2007.


Croydon Gateway Office Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=431910). Originally planned at 155m, this new scheme is slightly shorter, but now has approval. 135m/30 storeys.


Wellesley Square (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=520683). Berkeley Homes are planning a major residential tower for Croydon, designed by Rolfe Judd. Work may start
in 2010. Height is 134m/44 storeys.


360 London (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=12430910). First Base won planning permission in September 2007 for this Rogers-designed residential tower near Strata.
Height is 134m/44 storeys.


Eileen House (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=586208). A residential tower in Elephant & Castle that would join nearby Strata and 360 London.
Proposed in February 2009, this has been reduced in height due to the intervention of English Heritage.
Originally 143m/47 storeys, it will now be 134m/41 floors.


20 Blackfriars Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=389557). This project consists of two towers: a 98m office building and a 133m residential building. Approved in early 2009
following a PI.


150 Stratford High Street (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=429834). A major residential tower proposed for a site near the Olympic stadium. Height is 133m/41 storeys.


100 City Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=361792). This residential tower at the Old Street roundabout was rejected for being too tall. The developers lodged an appeal,
and won in October 2008. 131m/39 storeys.


30 & 40 Marsh Wall (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=573332). Possible 39 and 31-storey residential towers for Canary Wharf.


25 Churchill Place (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=20781318). This KPF-designed office tower was given a height increase in May 2008. It will now be 130m/23 storeys.


Stratford City Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=526528). Part of the masterplan for the area includes a 40-storey residential tower, revealed in September 2007.


Lots Road, Chelsea (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=313119&page=1&pp=20). Two residential towers, one of 122m/37 storeys and another of 85m/25 storeys. The taller tower
was originally planned at 99m, but was given a height increase and has now been approved. The shorter building,
originally planned at 130m, has now been reduced in height, and is approved. The developers were embroiled in a
dispute with a local NIMBY, but eventually got through the legal process, and the towers now have full approval.
Demolition began in early 2008.


News International, Wapping (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=520062). The headquarters of News International will feature two towers - one of 122m/27 storeys
and another of 56m/12 storeys. These will stand mid-way between the City of London and Canary Wharf.
The council is still considering a planning application, originally submitted in 2003 but updated in 2007.


Trafalgar Way Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=548133). A pair of residential towers designed by Make, at the northeast corner of the
Canary Wharf estate. They would link the Ontario and Quebec towers with the main cluster and Wood Wharf.
Heights would be 122m/35 storeys and 104m/29 storeys.


Sky Garden Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=724626). A residential tower in Vauxhall that would stand near St George's Wharf. Approved in October 2008.
Height is 120m/35 storeys.


Newfoundland Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=602319). Possible 37-storey hotel/residential tower for Canary Wharf, on a site bounded by Park Place,
Westferry Road and Heron Quays Road. Approximately 120m.


Elizabeth House redevelopment (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=492447). A trio of midrises for Waterloo, adjacent to the station. In October 2008, these
were called-in for a public inquiry and in October 2009 were refused due to their poor design. Heights are 117m/107m/90m.


Convoy's Wharf (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=857712). A trio of 3 residential towers in Greenwich, all of which are approved. The tallest will be 116m/40-storeys,
but its AOD height will be significantly higher, at 148m. The other towers will be 91m/32 storeys and 72m/26 storeys respectively.
Architect is Richard Rogers.


Islington City Basin Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=449694). Two towers with heights of 115m and 90m have outline planning permission for a site
in Islington, North London.


Arrowhead Quay (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=324062). A Docklands office development being planned by Ballymore. Currently on hold. 114m/26 storeys.


Milton Court (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=313664). Heron International, in partnership with Berkeley Homes, are planning a major residential tower for the City.
This will stand on a site immediately adjacent to Citypoint, adding to the emerging cluster around Moorgate. 112m/35 floors.
Demolition began in December 2007.


Walbrook Square (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=351887). A major redevelopment of a prominent site between Cannon Street and Bank stations which has seen
the demolition of Bucklersbury House (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=2371), one of the City's ugliest and most prominent eyesores. In its place will
stand four individual buildings connected by a new public square and 'historic' pedestrian routes, along with an exhibition space
displaying the remains of the Roman Temple of Mithras. In total, this massive development will contain almost a million square feet
of floorspace and will feature buildings of 106m, 71m, 67m and 66m. The project received approval in July 2007. However, latest
reports suggest that it faces a possible redesign and major delays.


100 Middlesex Street (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=342614). A student residential block that will help stretch the City skyline northeastwards.
105m/34 storeys.


Pioneer Point North (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=265492). This pair of residential towers, the tallest in North London, will stand near the Olympic stadium.
Construction got underway in early 2008. The tallest is 105m/31 storeys.


Eagle House (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=483737). A mixed-use tower for Old Street/City Road, just north of the City. Approved in April 2006. Architect is Terry Farrell
and the developer is Groveworld. Height is 104m/34 storeys.


Royal London Hospital Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=524174). Major new hospital for Whitechapel, East London. 101m/18 storeys.


Millharbour Residentials (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=351924). This new development is proposed right next door to the Pan Peninsula towers. It consists of
six interlinked towers of various heights, the tallest being approximately 100m/30 floors.


Reuters Blackwall Yard Redevelopment (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=591). Another project designed by Squire and Partners which includes a residential
tower of 98m/29 storeys. The development has been approved and will be located near Canary Wharf.
http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=591


Gypsy Corner Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=524254). Hamilton Associates are planning a 30-storey residential tower for Acton, West London.


Waterloo Trilogy Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=571509). Willingale Associates have plans for a 30 storey tower - dubbed Waterloo Trilogy Tower - on the
corner of Waterloo Road and Baylis Road (http://tinyurl.com/j9b4b), near the London Eye.


33-35 Commercial Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=387131). A residential tower, designed by Burland TM Architects for a fringe site just to the east of
the City of London. 95m/36 storeys


Ailsa Waterside (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=11296640&postcount=509). Mixed-use development in the Lower Lea Valley which includes 800 new homes in a cluster of towers.
The tallest is around 95m/30 storeys.


Indescon Court (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=563783). Mixed-use buildings to the south of the main Canary Wharf cluster. The tallest will be 95m/30 storeys.


East India Dock Road Development (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=464905). After the successful launch of the Elektron Tower scheme, Barratt Homes have
another new project for a site just over the road. This consists of a series of post-modernist yellow apartment blocks,
the tallest of which is 94m/36 floors.


60-70 St Mary Axe (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=680440). A new office building designed by Foggo Architects. Height is 90m/18 storeys.


Skylon (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=644343). Originally seen at the Festival of Britain (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festival_of_Britain) in 1951, there are now plans to resurrect this 90m structure.


20 Albert Embankment (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=497918). A trio of Foster-designed, mixed-use towers that will form part of a growing cluster of
developments in the area including St George's Wharf, Vauxhall Sky Gardens and 36-48 Albert Embankment. 89m/27 storeys.


Croydon College Vocational Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=444190). Mixed-use scheme, approved in February 2007, will become the tallest building
in Croydon, unless Croydon Gateway is built sooner. 88m/29 storeys.


250 City Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=834722). Land Sec are planning a large development that includes a 27 storey tower almost opposite the other
already consented City Road Basin towers.


Trinity One, Two and Three (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=367561). A series of three mixed-use buildings planned by Beetham for a massive site
on Minories, in the Aldgate area. Heights are 85m, 60m and 45m. The tallest will feature an observation deck
and public cafe on the top floor. The scheme was approved in January 2008, but is currently on hold.


Swiss Cottage Station Tower (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=8345297&postcount=835). Manchester developer Pervaiz Naviede is planning a tower of up to 25 storeys in north London,
after buying a landmark site above Swiss Cottage Tube station from CIT.


Alberta House (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=442488). New residential tower that will join both Ontario Tower and its neighbour to form a mini-cluster to the east
of Canary Wharf. 82m/24 storeys.


100 West Cromwell Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=602720). Multiplex/Tesco are planning a tower for a site on Cromwell Road / Hammersmith Flyover,
overlooking the tube from Earls Court to Olympia in West London. 82m/24 storeys.


"Baby Shard" (a.k.a. New London Bridge House) (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=296278&page=1). As part of the Shard London Bridge development, Irvine Sellar plans to
demolish New London Bridge House (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=246) and replace it with another midrise. The first proposal was for a 600,000 sq ft
office building of 88m, which was approved. A revised design was then submitted for a shorter building of 74m.
In July 2007, this too was approved. Work is scheduled to be underway from mid-2009 onwards.


Orchard Place (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=390192). Ballymore are planning a huge mixed-use scheme on the Leamouth Peninsula in the Docklands.
This began construction in July 2007 and consists of 10 towers ranging in height from 44-80m/14-26 floors.


NEO Bankside (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=565571). A trio of residential towers for the South Bank, close to the Tate Modern. The tallest tower will be around 80m/24 storeys.


1 Mitre Square (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=541996). Another new midrise from Helical Bar, planned for EC3 in the City. Architect is Sheppard Robson.


Chesterfield House (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=2916). New midrise being planned for Wembley, North London. The design is similar to Moorhouse.
It has been approved since 2001 and is yet to begin work. Height is 80m/19 storeys.


1 Commercial Street (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=15969005). A new 79m office tower for the eastern edge of the City.


Aldgate Union (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=327538). A massive groundscraper under construction on the eastern edge of the City. In total, it will contain
nearly 600,000 sq ft of floorspace. The 2nd phase will include a tower of 79m/17 storeys.


Victoria Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=430049). As part of the regeneration taking place in Victoria, Land Securities are developing a cluster of office towers.
Originally proposed at 160m, this project has been scaled down twice, and faces ongoing issues with Westminster council.
The tallest building is now 79m.


Goodmans Fields (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=499272). A residential scheme planned for a site just to the south of Aldgate. Includes a tower of around 76m/24 storeys.


Tate Modern Extension (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=377117). This major extension of the gallery will include a rather "arty" looking tower of 76m.


252-385 Alie Street (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=7466841). Hamilton Associates have submitted planning proposals for a new 76m/25 storey energy-efficient tower
in Aldgate. The building will have 287 apartments including affordable housing, plus retail units at ground floor.


Oakmayne Plaza Towers (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=469892). Three residential towers for Elephant & Castle. They have faced major delays, and now face a possible height reduction too.
The tallest will be 76m/23 storeys.


Great West Quarter (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=12145094). This project, part of the urban regeneration of the Great West Road Corridor, comprises the
redevelopment of the old Smithkline Beecham H.O. brownfield site into a new large mixed use residential development.
The project, to be completed in 2010 over a number of phases, will provide in excess of 750 private and affordable
residential units. The developers are Barratt Homes, and the tallest tower will be around 75m/25 storeys.


81 Black Prince Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=966638). A residential tower near the Albert Embankment. Originally turned down by Lambeth Council, it was approved following
a public inquiry. 24 storeys.


36-48 Albert Embankment (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=735574). A fin-shaped residential tower. Refused planning permission in January 2009. 75m/23 storeys.


32-42 Bethnal Green Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=570081). A residential tower for a site just north of the Bishopsgate Goods Yard. 74m/25 storeys.


399 Edgware Road (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=793). New 72m residential tower, approved in November 2006.


30 The North Colonnade (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=346835). This is one of several new midrises for Canary Wharf, the others being built in nearby Churchill Place.
It will contain 320,000 square feet of office floorspace, most of which has been let to Fitch Ratings and KPMG. The top of the
building overlooking Canada Square and Churchill Place will feature a double height winter garden. Height is 71m/17 storeys.


New Court (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=18680323). Merchant bank Rothschild's new headquarters for the City. 70m/14 storeys.


Potters Fields (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=212552). Originally planned as a cluster of 8 towers, the tallest being 69m, this project is now facing a complete redesign
following massive local opposition.


82 West India Dock Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=19943901). Containing a mixture of apartments and offices, this will stand to the northwest of the Docklands cluster. 69m/21 storeys.


120 Fenchurch Street (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=590728). A massive, bulky office development similar to Plantation Place. Originally proposed at 130m+,
it will now be 69m/14 storeys.


4 Mastmaker Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=507579). A pair of residential towers, to the south of the main Canary Wharf cluster. Construction is underway.
They will be 67m/22 storeys and 58m/19 storeys respectively.


Wandsworth Road Development (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=4837). A new residential midrise for Wandsworth Road, SW8. Height is 65m/21 storeys.


64-74 Mark Lane (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=422438). New office tower, adjacent to Fenchurch Street station. The sloping glass roof will provide skygarden access
on a number of floors. Height is 63m/17 storeys.


240 Blackfriars Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=457359). Great Portland Estates are planning a redevelopment of this prominent site on Blackfriars Road,
with a striking new 15-storey office tower containing 130,000 sq ft of offices with ancillary retail and residential accommodation
in a separate building. 65m/15 storeys.


The Stratford Eye (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=7841143). Also known as Maryland Works Redevelopment. A new 19-storey tower being built as part of
the regeneration of Stratford. 58m/19 floors.


72 Fore Street (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=579725). New office scheme adjacent to Moorgate station. Approved in February 2008. Height is 56m/13 floors.


46 Blackfriars Road (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=692734). A hotel/office development near Southwark station, next to the old BT building. Reduced in height
from 80m/20 floors. New height is around 55m/14 floors.


Bezier Apartments (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=18732580). A pair of striking residential towers for Old Street/City Road. Heights are just under 50m.


Chambers Wharf (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=717142). A new Simpson-designed residential scheme to the east of Tower Bridge. The project includes 13 wind turbines.
There are six buildings. The tallest will be 46m/14 floors.


Westminster Bridge Park Plaza (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=351973). A 16-storey luxury hotel with 1,037 suites, along with business lounges, executive meeting rooms,
a ballroom, 2 restaurants, a brasserie, bars, health spa, gymnasium and indoor pool. It will also feature one of London's
largest conference rooms. It replaces an ugly groundscraper on a site virtually opposite Big Ben. Groundwork is underway. 44m/14 floors.







London Skyline 2012 - all clusters in one view

The panorama below shows every planned cluster from West London to East London. Most of the major tower projects can be seen here.

Discussion thread: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=489244



http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/8822012skyline_pic1.jpg

malec
February 7th, 2006, 12:18 AM
Absolutely amazing thread! Again I have to say LBT is one of the best skyscrapers going up today. Will look amazing when done.

How long did this thread take to make btw?

LLoydGeorge
February 7th, 2006, 12:20 AM
Awesome projects!

Medo
February 7th, 2006, 01:06 AM
How long did this thread take to make btw?

I would guess 10 seconds ;)

smoothestlady
February 7th, 2006, 02:12 AM
Interesting...

TasteOfChaos
February 7th, 2006, 02:17 AM
I can't wait to see the future of our glorious city. These are some great outlines of ongoing projects. Thanks for posting this.

909
February 7th, 2006, 03:59 PM
It's a very impressive list with some stunning proposals. But i have one question: what's the point of designing and proposing skyscrapers while the time of construction is uncertain, like the Riverside South, North Quay and especially Heron Quays West? Some projects are known for years, but haven't made any serious progress. Why?

Dr. Dubai
February 7th, 2006, 04:15 PM
Yeah, thats a point I don't understand too. London must be a very attractive city if you take a look at the house prices. I don't understand why the buildings aren't going #UC already.

Citrus-Fruit
February 7th, 2006, 04:30 PM
There are alot of obsticles to clear in the UK before you can build, not to mention most inner city sites are already occupied by other buildings which means demolision alone takes 12 or so months.


Not all of the world has massive open space like you Mr Dubai ;) :cheers1:

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 7th, 2006, 04:38 PM
It's a very impressive list with some stunning proposals. But i have one question: what's the point of designing and proposing skyscrapers while the time of construction is uncertain, like the Riverside South, North Quay and especially Heron Quays West? Some projects are known for years, but haven't made any serious progress. Why?
Well, it would seem to me that if people didn't design and propose skyscrapers at all...there wouldn't be any... ;)

Just about every city that proposes skyscrapers does not know the time of construction, cus that aint the point. It is not their job to design skyscrapers only when a site is fully available and ready to build on. London is quite an old city, and has more buildings in it then any other city in Europe, and as such, just about every skyscraper proposed is going to be on a site that has an existing building still on it, and it can take a lot of time for the previous tennants to move out (the tennants of the area where LBT will go are being very stubborn!), and the building to be demolished. London isn't like Dubai, where there is lots of free land and no-one to wait for, London is a city where there isn't much space to build on, so land prices are expensive and construction of a building is a serious issue that takes a lot of time to approve! But don't woory, there are alredy a few buildings under construction and in the coming years more will start, remember, a lot have already been approved, plus there could be a few new skyscraper propsals in the future that might be able to proceed quickly. Just give it time! While other cities are in a construction boom now, so will London be in the near future!

:cheers:

www.sercan.de
February 7th, 2006, 04:43 PM
demolishing works are very very long :(
as i said before
You will get a +400m tower in some years

Intoxication
February 7th, 2006, 08:00 PM
I love the way Deputy PM John Prescott gives approval to these beautiful skyscrapers and doesn't care what English Heritage or anyone else thinks!! :)

smoothestlady
February 8th, 2006, 01:27 AM
Sir Ken Livingstone London Mayor may also have a bit to do with it considering hes new found joy is high rised tall buildings

spyguy
February 8th, 2006, 01:58 AM
What's really impressive to me is that many of these towers have very "green" designs.

Scruffy88
February 9th, 2006, 07:45 AM
making up for lost time eh London. These are some excellent skyscrapers being planned. If built London's skyline will be worldclass. A lot of glass. Loved them all- except for Beetham Tower. It looked a little too out of place

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 9th, 2006, 03:34 PM
^^ Yer I agree, I love eceryone of the new breed of London skyscrapers being proposed, excep for Beetham, I really hope they don't approve that one, jus looks too bulky and out of place. A few weeks ago I would have said LBT was my favourite, but the more I look at the Bishopsgate tower, the more I love it, and I now think it rivals just about every other skyscraper out there! LBT is still my second fav though!

:cheers:

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 9th, 2006, 03:43 PM
A diagram of all the proposed/approved/constructed skyscrapers in London by size (Some of the heights may be have changed):

http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?15943212

:cheers:

Citrus-Fruit
February 9th, 2006, 03:47 PM
Beetham is stunning - and by the way other skyscrapers are planned for this area aswell so it wont be alone and will form another cluster.

Citystyle
February 9th, 2006, 04:08 PM
London has the best looking towers planned in the world.

A r c h i
February 10th, 2006, 05:49 AM
A few weeks ago I would have said LBT was my favourite, but the more I look at the Bishopsgate tower, the more I love it, and I now think it rivals just about every other skyscraper out there! LBT is still my second fav though!

:cheers:

I'm the same LBT was my favourite a few months ago, but Bishopsgate is definitely my favourite now, as I think it has that regal look about which I associate with London, looks like a monarch with a crown and a large coat to me anyway, don't know if that was the architects intention but that's what I see, particularly in this shot.

http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers/london2012/10.jpg

Mr Bricks
February 10th, 2006, 12:43 PM
There are alot of obsticles to clear in the UK before you can build, not to mention most inner city sites are already occupied by other buildings which means demolision alone takes 12 or so months.


Not all of the world has massive open space like you Mr Dubai ;) :cheers1:

Isn´t Canary Wharf quite a wasteland? There doesn´t seem to be any buildings preventing skyscrapers from being built directly.

Btw, the spots where Leadenhall, Minerva and Bishopsgate will we built on, are they cleared or are there buildings there that have to be demolished first? If there are, shouldn´t they have started demolishing them already?

London
February 10th, 2006, 03:56 PM
^ was....a waste land. As for the city, the sites for the projects listen have current buildings on the sites

http://www.bardaglea.org.uk/bridges/docklands/images/lddc_royalswidearea2aerial.jpg

http://www.henleydragons.com/vsite/vimagesite/images/jpg/0,11410,997-0-39452-0-custom96370,00.jpg

Newcastle Guy
February 11th, 2006, 02:42 PM
www.bdonline.co.uk

Simpson told to rework skyscraper


Architect Ian Simpson has been sent back to the drawing board over his £500 million skyscraper proposed for London's South Bank, amid growing objections to the scheme.

Southwark council said this week that Simpson had effectively been asked to design a new scheme for 1 Blackfriars Road because of concerns about the public space at the base of the iconic 68-storey tower.

It also emerged that the neighbouring local authority, Lambeth, had joined Westminster in objecting to the plan, despite broad support from Cabe.

Simpson gave a bullish response, predicting Southwark would approve the scheme, and said a deal with an unnamed hotel operator to occupy the tower would shortly be announced.

Southwark design and conservation manager Julie Greer said the designs were being amended because of concerns over the overhanging part of the tower between Blackfriars Road and Stamford Street.

"It will effectively be a new scheme," she said. "You see that overhang arrangement with hotels but for a [largely] residential scheme, you just can't do that. That part of the scheme is being taken away… the architects are being very co-operative."

Greer added that the new designs were also intended to improve public realm links between Simpson's tower and two neighbouring projects - Kings Reach Tower, being remodelled by Make, and Wilkinson Eyre's 35-storey office tower also on Blackfriars Road.

Both Southwark and Lambeth believe Blackfriars Bridge is not an ideal area for tall buildings, and would rather develop them in Elephant & Castle and Waterloo respectively.

Simpson said the new design changes would improve his tower and insisted there was scope for such a development in that location.

"We are very positive about the scheme at the moment although we have got lots of work to do in describing the effect of the building on the skyline," he said.

"We think it will have a positive effect on the skyline and is in an ideal place. If a building is elegant, it can stand on its own.



This is really good news as the only thing that let it down IMO Was the way it stuck out.

Sinjin P.
February 11th, 2006, 03:24 PM
Nice thread and nice projects for London! :)

DarJoLe
February 11th, 2006, 04:24 PM
Btw, the spots where Leadenhall, Minerva and Bishopsgate will we built on, are they cleared or are there buildings there that have to be demolished first? If there are, shouldn´t they have started demolishing them already?

There are buildings currently there. Most of these still have tenants which have leases which aren't finished yet. The only current building on site that is empty is the Minerva site, which is a derelict 4 story building. But Minerva haven't got the cash to build their tower yet so can't start it.

I think the thing with London's projects is they get released far early than a lot of others around the world. We are planning for towers that won't start construction until around 2008/9, as the planning process in the UK takes a long time, and involves a lot of people. Which, as much as the UK forumers (and myself) complain about, it is a good thing, as it prevents a lot of awful architectural mistakes happening.

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 11th, 2006, 09:30 PM
www.bdonline.co.uk

Simpson told to rework skyscraper


Architect Ian Simpson has been sent back to the drawing board over his £500 million skyscraper proposed for London's South Bank, amid growing objections to the scheme.

Southwark council said this week that Simpson had effectively been asked to design a new scheme for 1 Blackfriars Road because of concerns about the public space at the base of the iconic 68-storey tower.

It also emerged that the neighbouring local authority, Lambeth, had joined Westminster in objecting to the plan, despite broad support from Cabe.

Simpson gave a bullish response, predicting Southwark would approve the scheme, and said a deal with an unnamed hotel operator to occupy the tower would shortly be announced.

Southwark design and conservation manager Julie Greer said the designs were being amended because of concerns over the overhanging part of the tower between Blackfriars Road and Stamford Street.

"It will effectively be a new scheme," she said. "You see that overhang arrangement with hotels but for a [largely] residential scheme, you just can't do that. That part of the scheme is being taken away… the architects are being very co-operative."

Greer added that the new designs were also intended to improve public realm links between Simpson's tower and two neighbouring projects - Kings Reach Tower, being remodelled by Make, and Wilkinson Eyre's 35-storey office tower also on Blackfriars Road.

Both Southwark and Lambeth believe Blackfriars Bridge is not an ideal area for tall buildings, and would rather develop them in Elephant & Castle and Waterloo respectively.

Simpson said the new design changes would improve his tower and insisted there was scope for such a development in that location.

"We are very positive about the scheme at the moment although we have got lots of work to do in describing the effect of the building on the skyline," he said.

"We think it will have a positive effect on the skyline and is in an ideal place. If a building is elegant, it can stand on its own.



This is really good news as the only thing that let it down IMO Was the way it stuck out.
You see, these guys agree with me! I hope they more-or-less redesign the entire tower because it just doesn't have any flare or passion! The design looks bulky, bland and unimaginative, and its location is prime choice in London, so it needs to look good! Back to the drawing board boys! But, as I said, this is the only London skyscraper I am not thrilled with!

:cheers:

NEXT_2006
February 11th, 2006, 10:19 PM
London has the best looking towers planned in the world.
no it doesnt :bash: Dubai does

Newcastle Guy
February 11th, 2006, 10:36 PM
no it doesnt :bash: Dubai does
Dubai towers are tall but not as well designed

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 12th, 2006, 04:17 AM
^^ Yer, my sentimets exactly! They seem to be trying to cover up the rather unspectacular design of the towers by making them exceptionally high to make up for it. It's just my oppinion, but Dubai has a fake look about it, it's all planned and built quickly, without much heart or great consideration into some of the designs, and the effect is it looks...kinda...err...how to describe it....errr....well, I suppose the term might be 'wannabe'...you know? As though it's just for show, to put them on the map and try to create a magnificent scity by building some skyscrapers.. IMO anyway ;)

But enough of Dubai, I don't want this turning into another bloody 'my city is better then yours' thread! Let's keep it clean, let's keep it London!

:cheers:

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 12th, 2006, 04:23 AM
^ was....a waste land. As for the city, the sites for the projects listen have current buildings on the sites

http://www.bardaglea.org.uk/bridges/docklands/images/lddc_royalswidearea2aerial.jpg

http://www.henleydragons.com/vsite/vimagesite/images/jpg/0,11410,997-0-39452-0-custom96370,00.jpg
Wow! I always love seeing and hearing about all the regeneration that's gone on at Canary Wharf, once just a derelict wasteland, and now it's the world's largest commercial development with a skyline that's growing better with each passing year!

Can you tell me where abouts (if at all) the Canary Wharf skyscrapers are now located on that first pic. Much appreciated!

:cheers:

Starscraper
February 12th, 2006, 12:55 PM
Canary Wharf is near the top of the picture in one of the loops of the Thames, while London City Airport is in between those two docks near the bottom of the pic.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v325/Neromasc/cw.jpg

Dan1987
February 12th, 2006, 02:28 PM
http://homepages.uel.ac.uk/u0012674/dlr/pics/jpgs/nwacon.jpg

Here is a picture of the initial construction phase of Canary Wharf, with 1 Canada Sq and the small surrounding buildings under construction. I'd date this picture around 1989-1990 time, so it would be another 10 years until 8 and 25 Canada Sq(the HSBC and Citigroup Buildings) started to rise from the ground.

Newcastle Guy
February 12th, 2006, 02:34 PM
It is amazing how much canary wharf has changed

http://www.byrne-bros.co.uk/showcase/heron.jpg

http://www.mykreeve.net/london/docklands/docklands_construction_with_canary_wharf.jpg

London
February 12th, 2006, 02:52 PM
The focus of each individual picture is focused on the actual master plan of canary wharf:

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a331/tijjan/Canhis.jpg

1) 1805
2) 1960's
3) 1970's
4) 1987
5) 1997
6) 2001
Today:
http://www.odessawharf.com/photos/view.jpg

http://ceciliaw.blogg.se/images/london_augusti_2005_085_153351655.jpg

Tubeman
February 12th, 2006, 11:48 PM
^ was....a waste land. As for the city, the sites for the projects listen have current buildings on the sites

http://www.bardaglea.org.uk/bridges/docklands/images/lddc_royalswidearea2aerial.jpg

http://www.henleydragons.com/vsite/vimagesite/images/jpg/0,11410,997-0-39452-0-custom96370,00.jpg

^
This is misleading... The top picture is the London Docks, not the West India Docks (where the Canary Wharf Estate is). You can hardly make out the West India Docks, they are in the distance. The London Docks don't look all that dissimilar to this picture today, there has been very little high-rise development.

bnmaddict
February 13th, 2006, 03:24 PM
I read in "The Wharf" (february 9 2006) that the Columbus tower will probably never get off the ground due to the impact of some tunneling crossrail works under the tower.

Plus, the site owner, Commercial Estate Group is leasing office space in Hertsmere House, which would be demolished to make way for the new tower, on long leases (stretching until 2013).

A leading South Quay-based commercial property specialist say that "the project looks dead in the water"...

Too bad, it would have been by far the most beautifull tower of CW.

brunob
February 13th, 2006, 03:26 PM
sorry off topic, you moved to E14??

bnmaddict
February 13th, 2006, 03:34 PM
sorry off topic, you moved to E14??

Yep, I just moved in a flat south of Millwall with direct views of CW!! :cheers2:

brunob
February 13th, 2006, 03:39 PM
nice - welcome to my neighborhood !

Xander
February 13th, 2006, 03:46 PM
^and mine, I live in E14, just near All Saints DLR.

brunob
February 13th, 2006, 03:49 PM
^^ that's my location too!! balfron,fusion, chrisp street...
lol i wonder how many of us live around.

bnmaddict
February 13th, 2006, 03:54 PM
^^ that's my location too!! balfron,fusion, chrisp street...
lol i wonder how many of us live around.

I bet there's a lot of Skyscraper lovers living between Mudchute and All Saints DLR...

brunob
February 13th, 2006, 03:56 PM
We shall see whoever else is part of our rollcall... Sorry folks once again to hijack the thead.

SE9
February 13th, 2006, 04:01 PM
ahh... SE9 will do fine for me ;)

Here's how your neighbourhood has developed over the years:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b281/SE9/50343755_44fa162031_o.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b281/SE9/51372255_df876d0113_o.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b281/SE9/93555047_b7769c8d65_b.jpg

(full size images are in the UK forum)


back onto topic, I like this render of SLB - LBT:

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a331/tijjan/lbt.jpg

and this of the MAKE designed tower:

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a331/tijjan/7.jpg

909
February 13th, 2006, 04:18 PM
^ Is the MAKE designed tower a serious proposal or just a vision?

SE9
February 13th, 2006, 04:34 PM
Well its more of a proposal than a vision. I think it was beaten by another proposal for this site, but we are yet to see a detailed render of this new proposal. I've only seen a simple one.

Phobos
February 13th, 2006, 11:58 PM
I don't know what to think about MAKE designed tower :|

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 14th, 2006, 03:23 AM
14 Feb 2006 > Skanska To Win Heron Tower Contract

Movement on construction of what will be the tallest building in the City of London looks imminent with mutterings that building contractor Skanska are in line for the GBP 500 million contract to build the KPF designed Heron Tower at 110 Bishopsgate. The other finalists in the competition to get the contract, Wembley builder Multiplex and Bovis Lendlease who seem to be currently constructing almost everything in the City.
The 202 metre tall skyscraper had won planning approval after a much fought over publc inquiry in 2002 and has since then been unable to progress further thanks to the occupancy of the site by Norton Rose who are not set to move out until 2007.
Despite this developer Heron are reported to have Skanska begin work almost as soon as the contract is awarded although is likely to be enabling works surrounding the site, obviously demolition itself cannot begin until Norton Rose vacate Kempson House in 2007.
There had been skepticism from some quarters that Heron were totally serious about constructing this tower, not least thanks to their chequered history on the European mainland where a number of Heron projects have been approved but failed to be realised.
Heron, like a growing number of property companies in London, have adopted an increasingly bullish attitude to the market of late, at first by increasing the total size of the tower adding 4 more office floors, the equivalent of another contained ‘office village’ in the multi tenanted development.
It’s now looking increasingly certain however that Heron will have the tower well underway speculatively before the end of 2007 hoping to catch the much touted increase in demand for office space in the City of London.


:cheers:

wjfox
February 14th, 2006, 09:46 AM
Excellent news.

eklips
February 14th, 2006, 02:59 PM
I am amazed at the quality of British renderings

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 14th, 2006, 09:02 PM
^^ Yer, they are so good as to render me speechless :D ...what....ure not laughing...? ;)

:cheers:

Newcastle Guy
February 15th, 2006, 09:14 PM
I posted this in another thread, here it is, updated:

I'm using WJ's original London List to make a List of towers for the whole Uk over 100m

UK Skyscrapers

Green = Completed
Blue = Proposed/Approved
Red = Under Construction


London- Shard/London Bridge- 310m
London- Bishopsgate Tower- 288m
London- Minerva- 247m
Birmingham- Arena Central Tower- 245m
London- Heron tower (110 Bishopsgate) 242m
London- Columbus Tower- 237m
London- 1 Canada Square- 235m
London- 122 Leadenhall- 225m
London- Beetham Tower- 219m
London- North Quay 1- 216m
London- Riverside South 1- 214m
London- Heron Quays West 1- 214m
London- North Quay 3- 203m
London- 8 Canada Square (HSBC Global Headquarters)- 200m
London- 25 Canada Square (Citigroup Centre)- 200m
London- Riverside South 2- 189m
Manchester- Eastgate Tower- 188m
London- BT Tower- 188m
Newcastle- Gallowgate Tower- 187m
London- Tower 42 (formerly known as the NatWest Tower)- 183m
London- St George's Wharf (Vauxhall Tower)- 181m
London- Suffolk House- 180m
London- Vauxhall Bondway Tower- 180m
London- SwissRe ("The Gherkin")- 180m
London- Wilkinson Eyre Tower- 176m
Manchester- Beetham Tower- 171m
Portsmouth- Spinnaker Tower- 170m
London- Vauxhall cross island tower 1- 170m
London- Stratford City Tower- 170m
Leeds- West point 1- 170m
London- Doon Street Tower- 168m
Liverpool- Brunswick Quay- 166m
Manchester- 1 Hardman square- 165m
London- Broadgate Tower- 164m
London- 1 Milharbour Scheme A- 160m
Leeds- Criterion place residential tower- 160m
London- 1 Churchill Place- 156m
London- Heron Quays West 2- 156m
London- 25 Bank Street- 153m
London- 40 Bank Street- 153m
London- Newington Causeway Tower- 152m
Birmingham BT Tower- 152m
London- 10 Upper Bank Street- 151m
London- Merchants square- 150m
London- Pan Peninsula Tower- 147m
London- Multiplex Tower- 147m
Blackpool- Blackpool tower- 144m
London- Guys Hospital- 143m
London- Wood Wharf Tower 1- 140m
London- Wood Wharf Tower 2- 140m
Liverpool- Beetham Tower West- 138m
London- 22 Marsh Wall Block 2- 137m
London- The London Eye- 135m
Brighton- City Gateway Tower- 135m
London- 100 Middlesex Street- 134m
Glasgow- Elphinstone Place- 134m
Liverpool- Central Station Tower 1- 133m
London- Cross Harbour Building 1-131m
Manchester- Crown Building-131m
Birmingham- Broadstreet Tower-131m
Birmingham- Holloway Circus Tower- 130m
Brighton- Brighton Marina Tower- 128m
London- Kings Reach Tower Rebuild- 128m
Northhampton- Express Lift Tower- 128m
London- Citypoint- 127m
London- Dome Waterfront Hotel- 127m
Liverpool- Radio City Tower- 125m
London- The Willis Building- 125m
London- Euston Tower- 125m
London- Shakespear Tower- 124m
London- Lauderdale Tower- 124m
London- Cromwell Tower- 124m
Brighton- New England Square- 122m
London- Lots Road Tower 1- 122m
London- News International Headquarters Building- 122m
London- North Quay Tower 2- 120m
Leeds- Providence Tower- 120m
London- Millbank Tower- 119m
London- 1 Millharbour (Scheme B) Tower 2- 119m
London- St Helens- 118m
Manchester- CIS Tower- 118m
Leeds- Monkbridge Forge Main Tower- 118m
London- Empress State Building- 117m
London- Centre Point- 117m
London- Convoys Wharf Tower 1- 116m
London- City Roads Basin Site A- 115m
Liverpool- Grand Central Lime Street- 115m
London- Arrowhead Quay (Scheme A)- 112m
Manchester- Chapel Wharf Tower 1- 112m
London- Kings Reach Tower- 111m
London- No.1 West India Quay- 111m
London- Arrowhead Quay Residential (Scheme B)- 111m
Leeds- Bridgewater Place- 110m
London- Norton Folgate Tower- 108m
Glasgow- Elmbank Tower- 108m
London- Upstream Building- 107m
Manchester- City Tower- 107m
Swansea- Ferrara Quay- 107m
London- Granite Wharf Tower 1- 107m
London- Granite Wharf Tower 2- 107m
Pioneer Point North- 105m
Leeds- Criterion place Hotel Tower- 105m
London- 33 Canada Square- 105m
London- Ontario Tower New Providence Wharf- 104m
London- 99 Bishopsgate- 104m
London- Eagle House- 104m
London- 1 Harbour Quay- 104m
London- Battersea Power Station- 103m
Brighton- Sussex Heights- 102m
Manchester- BSC Residential tower- 102m
London- Portland House- 101m
Cardiff- Heritage Gateway Scheme- 101m
Liverpool- Liverpool Cathedral- 101m
London- Royal London Hospital Tower 2- 101m
London- London Hilton On Park Lane- 101m
Sheffield- Arundale Gate Block 1- 101m
London- Drapers Garden- 100m
Birmingham- Alpha Tower- 100m
Birmingham- Joseph Chamberlain Clock Tower- 100m
London- Exchange Tower- 100m
London- Southwark Towers- 100m
London- Wallis House- 100m
London- United Standards House- 100m
London- Creekside Industrial Estate Building B- 100m
London- Vauxhall Cross Island Tower 2-100m

Over 100m:
42
10
73

By 2012: 126 over 100m

Skyscrapers (Over 150m)
12
2
30

By 2012: 44 Skyscrapers

Quite a good list. Most of these towers are in London, With quite a few in Manchester and Birmingham too.

In 2012:

London: 35 Skycrapers
Manchester: 3 Skycrapers
Birmingham: 2 Skycrapers
Leeds: 2 Skyscrapers
Liverpool: 1 Skycrapers
Newcastle: 1 Skycrapers
Portsmouth: 1 Skycrapers

Of course this is just going by what we know know. New proposals are coming out all the time, by 2012 we can expect dozens of new proposals.
And although it doesnt happen very often here, some towers could be cancelled.

Jack Rabbit Slim
February 16th, 2006, 05:30 AM
Heads up people, we have a new skyscraper proposal. A 131m tower, and this one is very unique in that, according to the article, it is almost a dead cert to go up, and should start construction in 2007. It is part of a six building plan, buildings A, B, C, D, E and F (as they are called in the article, with building A being the big one.)

From http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=543

16 Feb 2006 > Paddington Merchants Square Proposed

The Grand Union Building in Paddington, one of the buildings that started the recent trend for going tall in London, has been dropped thanks to the developer Chelsfield selling the site to the Paddington Development Corporation Limited that is half owned by busy Aussie developer Multiplex. Looking at what is approved for the site the PDCL have decided not to proceed with the scheme in its current form.
The Richard Rogers designed tower was to have been a largely office development of 132 metres tall featuring the classic Rogers' style of diagonal cross bracing and external service shafts with a mere 200 or so apartments.
As a victim of circumstance the tower was approved shortly after September the 11th and with the bottom having fallen out of the office market there were no takers for the space in the tower and despite the success of the rest of the development in providing office accommodation Chelsfield were reluctant to take the risk of a speculative build.
The development also takes in land that was due to be part of the terry Farrell penned Paddington Health Campus, an NHS public finance initiative that has become so bogged down in costs, bad contracting and redesigns that it is impossible for it to go-ahead due to the increasing cost of the land during this time that has reached whopping half a billion pounds.
The site has now been re-branded Merchant Square, a suitably aspirational name for the ambitious developers who hope to create a quarter that will rival the Broadgate Centre in the City of London and cost £700 million to build that has been masterplanned by the Kalyvides Partnership.
Unlike the previous incarnation it will contain a much larger residential aspect of 559 new homes of which 30% will be affordable, shops plus almost 100,000 square metres of new office space and hundreds of underground parking spaces.
The centrepiece is Building A, an entirely 43 floor residential tall building of roughly the same height as the Grand Union Building hosting 223 apartments, has worked on by Chicago based architects Perkins & Will. The tower includes continuous glass faces running up part of the south side of the tower with balconies on either side, the larger one rises above the roof level to form a glass blade.Building B is a couple of interlinked office blocks similar in massing to Plantation Place hosting 25,000 square metres of space that also designed by Perkins & Will. It will form the bulk of the development at a squat 14 floors.
Standing opposite will be Building C, it's a mid-rise block that will have 20,000 square meters of office space. Both of these buildings will also contain retail outlets on the lower floors creating a new shopping precinct.
Building D and F are both residential buildings designed by the Kalyvides Partnership, and U.K based Mossessian & Partners, with 140 and 196 residential units respectively and more ground floor retail plus three levels basement parking.
The last of the six buildings is Building E, the main office tower. It has 32,000 square metres of floor space and has also planned by Mossessian & Partners but this time in conjunction with Perkins & Will.
Unlike the last plans for Paddington Basin this time the developer is not only serious but already has a scheduled start date for the project of sometime in 2007 should approval be granted by Westminster Council. With the ever growing demand in London for new housing, not to mention the bullish attitudes of developers to large residential projects and in particular ever taller towers these are likely to get off the ground sooner than later, even if the PDCL waits some time for the office space to be taken and buildings one piece at a time.

:)

On innital inspection, builing A looks something like Heron tower, but in actual fact it is quite different, yet no less appealing. This is a really crappy picture that got scaled down after going through 'photobucket',

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y261/Jack_Rabbit_Slim/pic1.jpg

You can see a better, though not great, image of it here:

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images.php?se=nse&ref=4671&idi=Merchant+Square+Building+A

And you can see building B here:

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/imagesall.php?self=nse&ref=4670&idi=Merchant+Square+Building+B&selfidi=4670MerchantSquareBuildingB_pic1.jpg&no=1

And C:

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images.php?se=nse&ref=4672&idi=Merchant+Square+Building+C

Man, London is getting more skyscraper proposals then it can handle at the moment. I'm just waiting and hoping for another really big one, one to rival Bishopsgate and LBT...soon ;)

:cheers:

Newcastle Guy
February 16th, 2006, 05:19 PM
Cool, I like it much more than the Grand Union building project.
Could it have a spire?

JDRS
February 16th, 2006, 06:32 PM
On innital inspection, builing A looks something like Heron tower, but in actual fact it is quite different, yet no less appealing. This is a really crappy picture that got scaled down after going through 'photobucket',

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y261/Jack_Rabbit_Slim/pic1.jpg

You can see a better, though not great, image of it here:

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images.php?se=nse&ref=4671&idi=Merchant+Square+Building+A

In those renders it kind of reminds me of a modern version of the Barbican

JDRS
February 16th, 2006, 07:54 PM
Cool, I like it much more than the Grand Union building project.
Could it have a spire?

And I quote from gothics site

The tower includes continuous glass faces running up part of the south side of the tower with balconies on either side, the larger one rises above the roof level to form a glass blade.

Newcastle Guy
February 16th, 2006, 08:23 PM
And I quote from gothics site

Any ideas of how tall it is to the very tip then?

wjfox
February 16th, 2006, 10:17 PM
A little under 150m.

sourov
February 17th, 2006, 02:26 AM
very little amount of under construction

Zenith
February 17th, 2006, 02:16 PM
In those renders it kind of reminds me of a modern version of the Barbican

Thats exactly what I thought. I did my usual thing when I was up in London last week, I payed a visit to hungerford bridge to look at the view of the banks and the city. Far superior to standing on waterloo bridge IMO because u see both the city skyline and the sweep around the river, and i adore the bustle of people and trains.

Anyway it doesant matter how many times I see this view, im always amazed, its so beautiful, so dynamic. Is the way St Pauls so brilliantly lines up with T42 and swiss re etc. In my view it will be a shame when swiss re is overshadowed but christ just stand there and imagine leadenhall and difa etc. Well im still mega angry about the shit like that red brick london school, Im still ashamed by the parliament square and the bottom of whitehall. And I want the south bank to be even more dynamic, stick the skylon back up for a start.

Sorry off topic i know but hey.

Mosaic
February 17th, 2006, 02:30 PM
London is really cool city with those projects.

DarJoLe
February 17th, 2006, 03:38 PM
very little amount of under construction

There is loads of construction going on in London - it isn't just about skyscrapers.

Xander
February 17th, 2006, 04:15 PM
London is really cool city with those projects.
Its a really cool city anyway mate.

Newcastle Guy
February 17th, 2006, 06:02 PM
very little amount of under construction

Shows what you know, idiot.

wjfox
February 18th, 2006, 12:31 AM
very little amount of under construction

If you're talking about skyscrapers, then yes.

But if you include lowrise projects and transport/infrastructure projects, then London has absolutely masses of stuff being built (including, for example, the world's largest football stadium). There are cranes all over the city right now.

wjfox
February 18th, 2006, 12:34 AM
Thats exactly what I thought. I did my usual thing when I was up in London last week, I payed a visit to hungerford bridge to look at the view of the banks and the city. Far superior to standing on waterloo bridge IMO because u see both the city skyline and the sweep around the river, and i adore the bustle of people and trains.

Anyway it doesant matter how many times I see this view, im always amazed, its so beautiful, so dynamic. Is the way St Pauls so brilliantly lines up with T42 and swiss re etc.

This view, you mean:

http://www.willfox.com/images/upc/23.jpg



Definitely the best view in London. As Sharon Osborne would say: "Faaaabulous!" :)

wjfox
February 18th, 2006, 12:38 AM
The same view in 2012 - I know this has been shown dozens of times before, but I just can't get over how dramatic and stylish it will look:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/London_skyline_2012_large.jpg

eklips
February 18th, 2006, 01:19 AM
^^ I doubt it will ever look like that, new proposals are sure to come and a bunch of those towers will be either cancelled or modified.

But all in all, it is still promising :)

Steel Flame
February 18th, 2006, 01:22 AM
Any ideas of how tall my cock is to the very tip then? :weirdo:

Steel Flame
February 18th, 2006, 01:24 AM
^^ that's my location too!! ball from,fusion, chrispee :cheers: ...
lol i wonder how many of us live around. :weirdo:

Steel Flame
February 18th, 2006, 01:26 AM
Shows who you blow, idiot. :eek2:

wjfox
February 18th, 2006, 01:38 AM
^^ I doubt it will ever look like that, new proposals are sure to come and a bunch of those towers will be either cancelled or modified.


"A bunch" will be cancelled or modified? We're talking about 5 proposals here, only one of which is uncertain:

Bishopsgate Tower - expected to be approved in a few months. The design has already been modified to satisfy the CAA.

Heron Tower - if you saw my other thread recently, you'll know this tower has a 100% chance of going ahead now... and with a height increase too! :)

122 Leadenhall - this is being built by British Land, who are without doubt the most committed, profitable and reliable developers in London. I would be willing to bet my entire life savings on this tower going ahead. There's simply no doubt whatsoever it will be built.

Minerva - The only one of the City proposals which is uncertain.

51 Lime Street - already under construction!!!

Mr Bricks
February 18th, 2006, 02:14 PM
How is the reclad (exchange tower) proceeding?

DarJoLe
February 18th, 2006, 04:13 PM
Slowly.

SkyLerm
February 18th, 2006, 04:32 PM
Thnx for the information. Congratulations London :okay:
When are going to be completed all these fantastic projects:???
I hope to visit London 2012!!!
:happy:

Newcastle Guy
February 19th, 2006, 04:34 PM
:weirdo:

Can some one Ban this freak please?

wjfox
April 1st, 2006, 12:46 PM
http://www.gle.co.uk/onelondon/Gvine.htm

"...More jobs in the City than during dotcom boom; the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) says that the number of “City-type” jobs, in financial and professional services rose by 11,600 last year to reach 327,600 - beating the record established at the height of the dotcom boom. The CEBR also forecasts that the number of jobs will increase this year and next. Jonathan Said of CEBR says, “The City has continued to strengthen its position as the home for European merger and acquisition activity”. The big growth areas in City jobs are in investment banking as well as equities and bonds, professional services and corporate finance."

"...London has the most expensive flats in the world; according to research by Knight Frank prime new-build flats in London are selling for the highest price per square foot in the world. They estimate that new-build or refurbished flats in good locations sell for £1,744 per sq ft in London - £200 per sq ft more than the second most expensive location, Monaco and 70 per cent more expensive than New York..."

Manuel
April 1st, 2006, 01:59 PM
The uncertainty around Minerva may be a good thing. If cancelled, the huge amount of office it contain would fill the equivalent of 2-3 slim towers (or groundsrapers...)

Newcastle Guy
April 1st, 2006, 03:43 PM
Minerva - The only one of the City proposals which is uncertain.


I think this is pretty likely now. Minerva are looking for developers to build this tower with, providing they get someone withoney (Land secs, British Land etc...) Then this could be U/C in 2008/2009. If they DO get someone like that or wit that much money there is a posibility they could build it speculatively, and it could start (IMO, sorry if I'm wrong) in 2007

Newcastle Guy
April 1st, 2006, 03:47 PM
51 Lime Street - already under construction!!!

It sure is!

http://www.51limestreet.com/51limestreetcam/cam2/camputer21.jpg

OtAkAw
April 1st, 2006, 03:52 PM
I was so fortunate to catch Globe Trekkers/Lonely Planet at Travel and Living Channel last Friday, they featured LONDON! Oh my goodness, I thought I was going to drop dead! As a kid, I was always fascinated with London(and I thought it was a country then). Now growing up, I discovered Harry Potter and guess what, my obsession with London grew bigger!

It's nice to see alot of new building in London, it's so sad that two great (and evil) events happened in 1666 and 1940, The Two Great Fires, well you know, life's like that and what better way to relive the past than building a great future with cutting edge structures!

Skyman
April 1st, 2006, 03:55 PM
Updates at last...

Newcastle Guy
April 1st, 2006, 04:42 PM
These threads arent updated nearly as much as ones in the UK section, If you want to know more check them.

The 105m Pioneer point north (roof height) has broken ground and officialy began construction

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/142PioneerPointNorth_pic1.jpg

I do not know how tall it is to the spire

Pedrillo
April 1st, 2006, 07:14 PM
It sure is!

http://www.51limestreet.com/51limestreetcam/cam2/camputer21.jpg


:eek:

Phobos
April 1st, 2006, 09:33 PM
These threads arent updated nearly as much as ones in the UK section, If you want to know more check them.

The 105m Pioneer point north (roof height) has broken ground and officialy began construction

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/142PioneerPointNorth_pic1.jpg

I do not know how tall it is to the spire

Looks pretty good :okay:
Will it be located in the Isle of Dogs?

Manuel
April 1st, 2006, 09:34 PM
No no, further east, in a town centre.

www.sercan.de
April 2nd, 2006, 12:13 AM
a project in Istanbul

London = Tower/skyscrapers :D

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=7860816#post7860816

Peyre
April 2nd, 2006, 05:48 PM
British Land have announced that 122 Leadenhall will start in 2007, rarther than the anticipated 2008

Peyre
April 2nd, 2006, 05:51 PM
http://www.skyscrapernews.com/dump/122L.jpg

Newcastle Guy
April 2nd, 2006, 06:19 PM
^^ that is GREAT news!

London 2007,what will be U/C:

Shard/London Bridge (310m):

http://i2.tinypic.com/sv1loj.jpg

Heron Tower (242m):

http://www.britishdesign.co.uk/new/dd/images/portfolio/full/0b31bfd6c6eac569c871c92aa2a02577.jpg

122 Leadenhall (225m):

http://www.willfox.com/images/skyscrapers2/122leadenhall/3.jpg

Beetham London (220m):

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/1524BeethamLondon_pic1.jpg
(Will be revised first though)

20 Fenchurch street (190m):

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/468320FenchurchStreet_pic5.jpg

St Georges Wharf (183m):

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/119StGeorgesWharfTower_pic7.jpg

Multiplex living tower (147m)

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/4488MultiplexLivingTower_pic1.jpg

Then of course you have what is already U/C Broadgate (164m) and Pan Peninsula (147m), and maybe some others which I'm unsure bout the start (Riverside south etc...)

Jack Rabbit Slim
April 2nd, 2006, 06:38 PM
Fenchurch street tower and Beetham really do have shoddy designs by London's standards, and they need to do something about this! I believe Beetham tower's look is being modified at the moment, so that's a start. The rest of them I love though!!!

:cheers:

Skyman
April 3rd, 2006, 01:16 PM
Fenchurch street tower and Beetham really do have shoddy designs by London's standards, and they need to do something about this! I believe Beetham tower's look is being modified at the moment, so that's a start. The rest of them I love though!!!

:cheers:

Agree...
it would be nice to redesign these buildings

Newcastle Guy
April 3rd, 2006, 05:14 PM
Beetham will be much better soon, and to be honest I really like the front and back of Fenchurch street the only thing I'm unsure of in all of London's proposals is the sides of Fenchurch street

wjfox
April 8th, 2006, 05:58 PM
Bump

I've updated the summary on the 1st page.

Jack Rabbit Slim
April 9th, 2006, 03:32 PM
I wish they'd hurry up and approve Bishopsgate tower. I mean, we all know it's gonna get approval, and you know how long skyscrapers take to actually start constuction in London, so the sooner it gets approved, the better!

:cheers:

Marco Polo
April 11th, 2006, 02:45 PM
wjfox2002 - absolutely supreme job!!! thanks

NothingBetterToDo
May 1st, 2006, 04:27 AM
A little rendering i did showing the bigger proposals on the skyline........

http://img173.imageshack.us/img173/8591/londonrendering1ck.jpg

http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/9030/londonrendering17ui.jpg

jordan
May 1st, 2006, 08:59 AM
Bloody nice!!!

Skyscraperkid2K4
May 1st, 2006, 09:53 AM
wjfox2002 hurry up and update Bishopsgate towe will ya :)

Newcastle Guy
May 1st, 2006, 03:32 PM
Very nice! Would broadgate be visible from there?
and also You havent put in Fenchurch, which would probably be taller than T42 from here.

Other than that it is one of the best far distance renders I have seen in a long time!

Peyre
May 1st, 2006, 03:51 PM
Broadgate would be to the right of Swiss Re. Should be visible. (Near the red crane, the broadgate crane ;) )

NothingBetterToDo
May 1st, 2006, 03:58 PM
Very nice! Would broadgate be visible from there?
and also You havent put in Fenchurch, which would probably be taller than T42 from here.

Other than that it is one of the best far distance renders I have seen in a long time!

:okay:

I tried adding Fenchurch street and to be brutally honest it looked dire....it think its a mix of an ugly design and there are no good quality renderings to choose from for that building (they are all slightly 'cartoony' looking).

I will try and add Broadgate, but i'm not sure ive seen any good distance renderings of it that i can use, and i'm not sure which way it will be orientatied (fat side or skinny side :dunno: )

wjfox
May 1st, 2006, 04:04 PM
Use the image on the right -

http://i1.tinypic.com/s5v8ys.jpg


Height is 192m but it's closer to the river than the other towers so will appear much taller.

NothingBetterToDo
May 1st, 2006, 04:17 PM
^^ yeah, i tried that image it just looked wrong....like i said, its a bit too 'cartoony' compared to the other buildings.

But i will add it somtime today, because i aim to please :);)

zee
May 1st, 2006, 05:18 PM
it looks abit like the WTC being drunk and tipsy!! who agrees?

Newcastle Guy
May 1st, 2006, 05:22 PM
Hopefully it will be redesigned like the beetham tower currently is.

Newcastle Guy
May 1st, 2006, 05:25 PM
As I said in another thread it would be much better if it just hac the bottem curve and the top one was flattened so it is the same width to the top, because some things like the big external balcony at the top are great

NothingBetterToDo
May 1st, 2006, 06:24 PM
Ok...here are my new renderings....hot off the press

20 Fenchurch street and the Broadgate tower have now been added

http://img476.imageshack.us/img476/7913/londonrender30yp.jpg

http://img464.imageshack.us/img464/4564/londonrender3a4fd.jpg

wjfox
May 1st, 2006, 06:39 PM
Oh very nice, well done... I'm impressed.

www.sercan.de
May 1st, 2006, 06:58 PM
how dou you dooo that???

it looks real :D

London
May 1st, 2006, 07:39 PM
it looks abit like the WTC being drunk and tipsy!! who agrees?

lol. good use of imigery. Yep... i agree :lol:

jef
May 1st, 2006, 07:42 PM
View of the City cluster from the top of St Paul (see http://www.kpf.com/files/StPaulsStoneGallery.pdf). At the left is represented the Broadgate Tower (164m) and at the right the Willis Building (125m), both u/c. Heron Tower is at revised height (202m) and the Bishopsgate Tower is 288m tall.


http://i3.tinypic.com/wwahs0.jpg

London
May 1st, 2006, 07:42 PM
NothingBetterToDo, your renderings are nothing less than profesional. I guess people dont need me anymore :|

NothingBetterToDo
May 1st, 2006, 08:14 PM
NothingBetterToDo, your renderings are nothing less than profesional. I guess people dont need me anymore :|

ah now... dont be silly young man. I've seen some of your renders from places like Primrose hill, and renders of the main cluster and they are great.

Anyway, i'm incredibly lazy and can can rarely be bothered to do a render.........dont know whats come over me lately


:cheers: :);)

NothingBetterToDo
May 1st, 2006, 08:45 PM
ok.....here is that view at dusk........

http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/1605/dusk9da.jpg

Mr Bricks
May 1st, 2006, 08:48 PM
Good renderings!
Isn´t that brown brickbuilding going to be replaced with a shopping mall or something like that?

Medo
May 1st, 2006, 09:10 PM
Here's one of my renderings :crazy2:

http://i2.tinypic.com/wwc5k8.jpg

Newcastle Guy
May 1st, 2006, 09:17 PM
Nice!

St. Anger
May 2nd, 2006, 08:16 AM
good job!, that must hav took ages to do

TampaMike
May 2nd, 2006, 11:33 PM
Good renderings!
Isn´t that brown brickbuilding going to be replaced with a shopping mall or something like that?
Yes, I believe there is going to be a mall built in the area of the brown tower. I'll get some info.

Zenith
May 3rd, 2006, 03:05 PM
yes a ridiculous hulking mall instead of lots of beautiful classical/unique buildings with varying roof heights and roof gardens, fountains etc. Disgustiing. Napolean called us a nation of shopkeepers, now we just ape America.

Skyman
May 3rd, 2006, 03:18 PM
Nice work guys, these renders are pretty cool...

Phobos
May 3rd, 2006, 11:58 PM
yes a ridiculous hulking mall instead of lots of beautiful classical/unique buildings with varying roof heights and roof gardens, fountains etc. Disgustiing. Napolean called us a nation of shopkeepers, now we just ape America.
Totally agreed.I thought London has learned the lesson after Euston Station and other ones,but It seems this wonderful city is becoming more and more an America wannabe(at least architecturally).I'm sorry to say that,but It's my opinion.

Newcastle Guy
May 4th, 2006, 12:06 AM
America wannabe? No thanks.

london lad
May 4th, 2006, 06:23 AM
Originally Posted by zenith
yes a ridiculous hulking mall instead of lots of beautiful classical/unique buildings with varying roof heights and roof gardens, fountains etc. Disgustiing. Napolean called us a nation of shopkeepers, now we just ape America.

Totally agreed.I thought London has learned the lesson after Euston Station and other ones,but It seems this wonderful city is becoming more and more an America wannabe(at least architecturally).I'm sorry to say that,but It's my opinion.

While I quite like the brown building which One new change (which incidently does have a roof garden) is replacing its not an exceptional piece of architecture. In fact most of the new architecute , including skyscrapers in London are by & large replacing post war office buildings with no architectural merit & are no longer suitable for modern office enviroments. No body is copying America or anyone else- Worldwide the trend is for glass & steel offices, with a great deal designed by British architects both here & abroad.

To hark back to the days of classical architecture that the Victorians were so good at is just not desirable these days mainly as modern versions of classical buildings end up looking like paternoster square etc- A poor imitation. London has plenty of classical architecture & will not anytime soon see them replaced by modern glass & steel. Whats happening in London , as I mentioned is alot of redeveloping of post war buildings, nothing more. London is the unique city it is today because of hte fact that it is not stuck in the past & constantly evolving.

London
May 4th, 2006, 10:33 AM
Totally agreed.I thought London has learned the lesson after Euston Station and other ones,but It seems this wonderful city is becoming more and more an America wannabe(at least architecturally).I'm sorry to say that,but It's my opinion.

We welcome opinions. But when you compare London's glass and steel architecture with new yorks concrete architecture, your on another planet :)

Euston is probably the only glass and steel city of skyscrapers in america. But again, when you compre glass and steel boxes with glass and steel cheesegraters, helter-skelters or shards of glass, your on another planet further away than the previous planet you were on. Infact, so far away, the planet hasnt been discovered yet :)

But if you were talking about canary wharf and euston, or canary wharf and new yorks financial district, then i could partially agree with you. There are slight similarities. But saying London is a wannabe is just a completely unjustified and uneducated answer to London's forever rising might. Is it envy?

london lad
May 4th, 2006, 01:16 PM
We welcome opinions. But when you compare London's glass and steel architecture with new yorks concrete architecture, your on another planet :)

Euston is probably the only glass and steel city of skyscrapers in america. But again, when you compre glass and steel boxes with glass and steel cheesegraters, helter-skelters or shards of glass, your on another planet further away than the previous planet you were on. Infact, so far away, the planet hasnt been discovered yet :)

But if you were talking about canary wharf and euston, or canary wharf and new yorks financial district, then i could partially agree with you. There are slight similarities. But saying London is a wannabe is just a completely unjustified and uneducated answer to London's forever rising might. Is it envy?

You do realise Phobos means Euston railway station & not Houston the city in the USA or have you got your wires crossed?!??

Newcastle Guy
May 4th, 2006, 07:14 PM
Some comparisons for you all :D

http://i1.tinypic.com/x3thtf.jpg

http://img333.imageshack.us/img333/1949/lbtchry9ha.jpg

Some New York buildings with some London buildings, Including the cancelled Millenium tower.

http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/3081/18wm.jpg

Newcastle Guy
May 4th, 2006, 07:15 PM
It looks like London could be close to getting a building of ESB proportions, hopefully there will be something like that pop up in the next decade:D

Zenith
May 5th, 2006, 04:15 PM
No body is copying America or anyone else- Worldwide the trend is for glass & steel offices, with a great deal designed by British architects both here & abroad.

I was talking about malls myself, nothing more.

wjfox
May 5th, 2006, 11:04 PM
News of a possible 45-storey tower for East India Dock Road, near Canary Wharf:-

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=593


http://homepage.mac.com/benveasey/.Pictures/eastindia.jpg

wjfox
May 6th, 2006, 04:38 PM
Just spent the last hour editing my summary on page 1 of this thread - all of the info should now be fully up-to-date.

Notice how long the list of 'Other projects' at the end is getting! :)

Newcastle Guy
May 6th, 2006, 05:21 PM
Good work WJ!

That new development looks OK, pretty tall, and as it is close to Elektron it will start it's own mini residential cluster close to CW

ferge
May 7th, 2006, 12:06 AM
I'm hoping its just a poor quality rendering, the shapes and mass look okay, just looks a bit cheap.. but, like I said.. I hope thats just down to lazy media, and not lazy design

andysimo123
May 7th, 2006, 01:22 AM
Compared to other buildings going up and others planned, that looks abit poor.

Newcastle Guy
May 7th, 2006, 03:04 PM
It's a change to all the steel and glass

L-er
May 7th, 2006, 03:52 PM
It's OK.

wjfox
May 8th, 2006, 10:48 PM
Interesting project for Leadenhall Street - http://www.black-architecture.com/

Jack Rabbit Slim
May 9th, 2006, 03:51 AM
Interesting project for Leadenhall Street - http://www.black-architecture.com/
Hmm, looks pretty interesting. Any idea of the height, chance of construction etc etc??

Oh, and what is there curently??

:cheers:

Modernization
May 9th, 2006, 05:25 AM
Compared to other buildings going up and others planned, that looks abit poor.

London is still a flat city and no highrise. Most Europeans cities are like that. THey don't like skyscrapers.

london lad
May 9th, 2006, 08:02 AM
London is still a flat city and no highrise. Most Europeans cities are like that. THey don't like skyscrapers.

Whats that got to do with the comment you highlighted???

Fragmentor
May 9th, 2006, 09:27 AM
Hopefully the Spire on that Leadenhall one will show up on the skyline?

DarJoLe
May 9th, 2006, 02:05 PM
London is still a flat city and no highrise. Most Europeans cities are like that. THey don't like skyscrapers.

Oh dear! I think you need to get out more.

Mr Bricks
May 9th, 2006, 03:37 PM
Interesting project for Leadenhall Street - http://www.black-architecture.com/

Wow, that is an amazing tower!

Zim Flyer
May 9th, 2006, 04:23 PM
Interesting project for Leadenhall Street - http://www.black-architecture.com/

That looks ugly, especially compared to the style and grace of the Gherkin.

Zim Flyer
May 9th, 2006, 04:27 PM
News of a possible 45-storey tower for East India Dock Road, near Canary Wharf:-

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=593


http://homepage.mac.com/benveasey/.Pictures/eastindia.jpg

Another ugly building. I would like to see the architects, they are probably wearing big flairs and have big hair. If their work is straight out of the 1970's, I bet their dress sense is as well.

gamma_ray_burst
May 9th, 2006, 04:44 PM
Another ugly building. I would like to see the architects, they are probably wearing big flairs and have big hair. If their work is straight out of the 1970's, I bet their dress sense is as well.


I agree

It seems a new version of a modern trelliic tower

L-er
May 9th, 2006, 05:51 PM
Interesting project for Leadenhall Street - http://www.black-architecture.com/

Where can I find this on the UK Forums?

wjfox
May 9th, 2006, 05:55 PM
Where can I find this on the UK Forums?
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=348170

L-er
May 9th, 2006, 07:37 PM
^^ Thanks! I like the design of this tower but I think its location is not that good. It actually spoils the impact of Swiss Re. These two towers don't really fit together.

london lad
May 10th, 2006, 02:22 PM
quite a good promo video of some new developments happening in london

http://www.visitlondon.com/business/future_london/

Its quite a large download btw

wjfox
May 10th, 2006, 02:54 PM
^^ Saw it last night. Very cool :cool:

Zenith
May 12th, 2006, 12:06 AM
Christ im proud of our capital city. It really is Londons time. Actually its always been Londons time, but its experiencing something truly staggering, development on a scale not seen since Victorian times; a time when it was the most powerful and populous city in the world. Well its still one of the most powerful in the world. 70 billion pounds worth of investment, really just think about that for a minute. Staggering.

Nowhere else gets to me quite like London. Ive said it many a time before, but standing in the summer, on a warm night with a cool breeze on Hungerford bridge...taking in the panorama, St Pauls on the left, canary wharf in the distance, and the lights of the city glowing in the middle and right. Amazing place.

End of.

wjfox
May 12th, 2006, 12:25 AM
its experiencing something truly staggering, development on a scale not seen since Victorian times;
Yes, and that's no exaggeration.

When you add everything up, and see everything that's going on, it becomes clear.

London has all this going on, and more -


* Olympic Stadium
* Stratford City
* Wembley Stadium
* Emirates Stadium
* Heathrow Airport Terminal 5
* Crossrail
* Channel Tunnel Rail Link
* East London Line tube extensions
* Thames Gateway Bridge
* Elephant and Castle regeneration
* Wood Wharf
* Greenwich Peninsula regeneration
* King's Cross regeneration
* Paddington Waterside regeneration
* Croydon regeneration
* White City
* Battersea Power station regeneration
* O2 Arena


Plus, over 30 major new skyscrapers including -

* Shard London Bridge
* Bishopsgate Tower
* Heron Tower
* 122 Leadenhall Street
* Beetham Tower
* Canary Wharf Riverside South
* North Quay
* 20 Fenchurch Street redevelopment
* Broadgate Tower
* St George's Wharf
* Pan Peninsula Tower
* Multiplex Tower

Plus literally dozens of midrises and other new buildings.

wjfox
May 19th, 2006, 11:46 PM
One of London's ugliest groundscrapers - namely 1 Westminster Bridge - is apparently scheduled for demolition next Thursday 25th May. In case you didn't know, it's the concrete hexagonal building in the bottom-left of this aerial view:


http://i4.tinypic.com/104oi83.jpg


http://i4.tinypic.com/104oihf.jpg




In its place will stand a 14-storey luxury hotel with 900 suites, along with business lounges, executive meeting rooms, a ballroom, 2 restaurants, a brasserie, bars, health spa, gymnasium and indoor pool.

It will also feature one of London's largest conference rooms.

http://www.1westminsterbridge.co.uk/


http://www.1westminsterbridge.co.uk/images/westminster.gif


http://i4.tinypic.com/104oozl.jpg

Newcastle Guy
May 20th, 2006, 12:21 AM
I really like the view you get of big ben

Mr Bricks
May 20th, 2006, 12:29 PM
Good news! Another ugly concrete block being demolished, and the building that is going to replace it looks really nice. When is it due to be completed?

SimLim
May 21st, 2006, 03:29 PM
Another 106m cheesegrater/connect 4/shiny turd tower has also been proposed in the city. Looks strangely pants at the moment.

Gherkin
May 21st, 2006, 05:08 PM
^^ Which tower are you talking about? I quite like the idea of a 106m connect 4 actually.

Newcastle Guy
May 21st, 2006, 05:13 PM
A set of foster/nouvell towers, all we have seenis a terrible newspaper render so far, and again people are jumping to conclusions with barely anything to go on.

Gherkin
May 21st, 2006, 05:20 PM
Oh that one :(. I can't say I enjoyed looking at that 'render', but I'm sure the developer will release a stunning new render to make us all change our minds :) This could be another 20 Fenchurch street situation with this tower.

Newcastle Guy
May 21st, 2006, 09:49 PM
The new Barret towers near CW, pic compliments of DarJoLe

http://static.flickr.com/50/150508194_529b7411ca_o.jpg

samsonyuen
May 21st, 2006, 10:02 PM
One of London's ugliest groundscrapers - namely 1 Westminster Bridge - is apparently scheduled for demolition next Thursday 25th May. In case you didn't know, it's the concrete hexagonal building in the bottom-left of this aerial view:


http://i4.tinypic.com/104oi83.jpg


http://i4.tinypic.com/104oihf.jpg




In its place will stand a 14-storey luxury hotel with 900 suites, along with business lounges, executive meeting rooms, a ballroom, 2 restaurants, a brasserie, bars, health spa, gymnasium and indoor pool.

It will also feature one of London's largest conference rooms.

http://www.1westminsterbridge.co.uk/


http://www.1westminsterbridge.co.uk/images/westminster.gif


http://i4.tinypic.com/104oozl.jpg

I thought it was a listed building? That's great news. For such a great location, it deserves a much better occupation. Anyword on who is running the hotel? Mandarin Oriental or Shangri-La perhaps?

Does anyone know what phase the towers just south of Westferry Circus near Canary Wharf is at?

ferge
May 22nd, 2006, 12:06 AM
The new barratt render is a move in the positive direction, looks less cheap from that angle, would be quite a differential and welcome look to the boxes of CW..

wjfox
May 23rd, 2006, 09:56 PM
New rendering of the Broadgate Tower


http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/344/2232/1600/broadgate%20and%20201%20bishopsgate%20render%203.1.jpg

Newcastle Guy
May 23rd, 2006, 10:09 PM
Excellent, loving the niht time view! Like the tower even more now!

SE9
May 23rd, 2006, 10:41 PM
^ Me too. As soon as its finished, I'm up there with my camera. If the cladding is done well, the building should have interesting reflective qualities.

Tubeman
May 24th, 2006, 04:17 AM
Wicked render... I'm still struggling a bit visualising the floorplate shape of the main tower though... Is it rhomboid? triangular? trapezoid?

Its certainly not looking rectangular in the renders

Skabbymuff
May 24th, 2006, 04:26 AM
so the building is going to be full off chip/ board makers then (nvidia + amd)?

Zenith
May 24th, 2006, 04:21 PM
Has anyone else taken the video tour of the new 1 Westminster place yet ?

I dont know why they cut me out of it....Just after the girl takes her clothes off and... :runaway:

Dan1987
May 24th, 2006, 04:50 PM
Wicked render... I'm still struggling a bit visualising the floorplate shape of the main tower though... Is it rhomboid? triangular? trapezoid?

Its certainly not looking rectangular in the renders


Its shaped like a parallelogram

Tubeman
May 24th, 2006, 07:23 PM
Its shaped like a parallelogram

Sweet :)

I'm still pinching myself that a 164M tower is u/c in The City as I type... This is big news!

wjfox
May 24th, 2006, 07:28 PM
And in 6 months there'll be work starting on a 225m tower. :)

jonovision
May 24th, 2006, 07:40 PM
So I just saw The DaVinci Code last night and I thought it showcased London quite well. I know it was filmed last year, but I did notice a large construction site right behind the new city hall. What exactly is happenning there?

wjfox
May 24th, 2006, 08:49 PM
So I just saw The DaVinci Code last night and I thought it showcased London quite well. I know it was filmed last year, but I did notice a large construction site right behind the new city hall. What exactly is happenning there?
http://www.morelondon.co.uk/

Newcastle Guy
May 24th, 2006, 08:56 PM
Sweet :)

I'm still pinching myself that a 164M tower is u/c in The City as I type... This is big news!

165m actually:)

El_Greco
May 24th, 2006, 09:13 PM
^ wow :D

SE9
May 24th, 2006, 09:19 PM
Does anyone know the nearest station to this tower?

El_Greco
May 24th, 2006, 09:21 PM
^ Liverpool Street,Old Street,Shoreditch.

wjfox
May 24th, 2006, 09:24 PM
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=533304&y=181938&z=1&sv=primrose+street&st=1&tl=Primrose+Street,+EC2&searchp=newsearch.srf&mapp=newmap.srf

SE9
May 24th, 2006, 09:38 PM
Thanx man. I'll be up there err-week after my exams.

Mr Bricks
May 24th, 2006, 09:55 PM
And in 6 months there'll be work starting on a 225m tower. :)

What tower are you refering to?

SE9
May 24th, 2006, 09:58 PM
The Leadenhall Building (112 Leadenhall Street)

more commonly known as "damn thats good"

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b281/SE9/leadenhall1.jpg

samsonyuen
May 24th, 2006, 11:07 PM
Nice!

wjfox
May 25th, 2006, 01:47 AM
Willingale Associates have plans for a 30 storey tower - dubbed Waterloo Trilogy Tower - on the corner of Waterloo Road and Baylis Road (http://tinyurl.com/j9b4b), near the London Eye.

Jack Rabbit Slim
May 25th, 2006, 04:02 AM
^^ And it has now officilly appeared on skyscrapernews.com, no renders as of yet, but they did give an estimated height of 91m:

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=4804

wjfox
May 26th, 2006, 10:12 AM
Another one -


http://i4.tinypic.com/10puc1j.jpg

london lad
May 26th, 2006, 12:54 PM
^^ And it has now officilly appeared on skyscrapernews.com, no renders as of yet, but they did give an estimated height of 91m:

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=4804

Jack -you do realise that some of the main contributors on the UK forum also run skyscrapernews.com hence the news nearly simultanously appearing on both

Zenith
May 30th, 2006, 03:04 PM
Please start construction on these things soon ,plssssssssssssssssssss

And I want to see a 400m scraper !

colemonkee
May 30th, 2006, 11:54 PM
Another one -

http://i4.tinypic.com/10puc1j.jpg
Looks like a smaller version of Cira Center in Philadelphia. Very nice!

Tubeman
June 1st, 2006, 05:01 PM
Prepare to mess pants...

http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/3391/london4jg.jpg

Courtesy of hazardously_wasted

CrazyMac
June 1st, 2006, 06:57 PM
nice...but it doesnt look 65 metres taller than Leadenhall

If i remember DIFA = 288m Leadenhall = 223m

Still very impressive.

London
June 1st, 2006, 07:21 PM
^^
Difa = 288
Minus
122L = 225

= 63

So there is the 13 floors it has above 122L each with a height of approx 4.3m, plus its little spire, say, 8m. It adds up to approx 63m :)

London
June 1st, 2006, 07:31 PM
Look...

http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_01.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_02.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_03.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_04.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_05.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_06.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/leadenhall_big_07.jpg

London
June 1st, 2006, 07:39 PM
Look...

cool theres some stunning renders on there
beetham:

http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_01.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_02.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_03.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_04.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_05.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_06.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_01.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_08.jpg
http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/images/blackfriars_big_09.jpg

TallBox
June 1st, 2006, 07:57 PM
very nice renders, but wrt beetham, i don't like those multi-coloured tiles. doesn't work well on torre agbar, won't work well on a tower in gloomy london

L-er
June 1st, 2006, 08:01 PM
Looks like it's render day in London. Cool pics.

London
June 1st, 2006, 08:07 PM
lol. totally!

very nice renders, but wrt beetham, i don't like those multi-coloured tiles. doesn't work well on torre agbar, won't work well on a tower in gloomy london

I Agree, but apparently they're not visible during a gloomy day. They only glitter upon reflexion of the sun - so it's a win win situation.

scorpion
June 1st, 2006, 08:17 PM
it's a win-win situation in london these days...

:)

Skyman
June 1st, 2006, 09:48 PM
All the renders look so great like the real shots

Tubeman
June 1st, 2006, 09:55 PM
I really wasn't liking Beetham 'til I saw these renders, but I've been won over! :drool:

The 122 Leadenhall renderings are gobsmackingly fantabulous :drool: :drool: :drool:

Re: DIFA not looking 63m taller than 122 Leadenhall in the render I posted, its probably the perspective... Leadenhall is closer to the viewer than DIFA

Skid-Mark
June 2nd, 2006, 04:55 PM
Where are these renders coming from?

I've always liked beetham, hope the redesign doesn't change too much.

DocShergar
June 2nd, 2006, 05:04 PM
Wow!! Some great renders of some great buildings. Good to see some great looking going up in London.

Are they all under construction? If so what are the completion dates?

SE9
June 2nd, 2006, 05:08 PM
@Skid-Mark:

http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/Projects.asp

Tubeman
June 2nd, 2006, 06:15 PM
Wow!! Some great renders of some great buildings. Good to see some great looking going up in London.

Are they all under construction? If so what are the completion dates?

DIFA (Bishopsgate) and 122 Leadenhall are both approved and demolition on the existing buildings should start next year. Beetham is having a bit of a redesign I think. We're also hopefully going to see demolition work starting for Heron Tower and The Shard (London Bridge Tower) next year, and this is in addition to the under construction Willis Building and Broadgate Tower.

It looks like the boom that has been threatening for some years might finally happen in 2007!

Completion dates will vary of course, but hopefully its safe to say they'll all be complete in time for the 2012 Olympics! :happy:

Phobos
June 3rd, 2006, 02:28 AM
Beetham tower has a fucking horrible shape.It looks like a pregnant building :runaway:
I hope they change the design and the cladding of it as well.

wjfox
June 6th, 2006, 10:55 PM
This pano of mine is far from complete.

In addition to what you see here, we'll have (from left to right) Milton Court, Eagle House, Ropemaker Place, Northgate Tower, Broadgate Tower, 100 Middlesex Street, Heron Plaza, 80-88 Bishopsgate, Walbrook Square, 20 Fenchurch Street, Kings Reach redevelopment, Beetham Tower, Wilkinson Eyre Tower, Doon Street Tower......


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/London_skyline_2012_panorama.jpg

Skid-Mark
June 7th, 2006, 12:07 PM
@Skid-Mark:

http://dij8.com/clients/alex/cityscape/Projects.asp

Thanks se9, wow, whoever did these is extremely talented.

Skid-Mark
June 7th, 2006, 12:09 PM
Beetham tower has a fucking horrible shape.It looks like a pregnant building :runaway:
I hope they change the design and the cladding of it as well.

Affraid i have to disagree with you phobos, i think this tower is excellent (bump included) and has it's own distinctive appeal, i'd want to live in it.

Of course thats only my opinion.

lpioe
June 7th, 2006, 12:58 PM
amazing projects!
shame the London Bridge Tower is not closer to the london city cluster.

DarJoLe
June 7th, 2006, 01:14 PM
amazing projects!
shame the London Bridge Tower is not closer to the london city cluster.

It is closer than in real life than in the rendering, the river bends round and goes between the tower and the City cluster.

But anyway, London Bridge Tower is so sublime and elegant it holds its own and doesn't need a cluster. In fact, it wouldn't look half as good as part of a cluster.

wjfox
June 7th, 2006, 01:21 PM
But anyway, London Bridge Tower is so sublime and elegant it holds its own and doesn't need a cluster. In fact, it wouldn't look half as good as part of a cluster.
I agree 100%

DarJoLe
June 7th, 2006, 01:34 PM
Bit like Big Ben.

storms991
June 8th, 2006, 12:11 AM
I love the short version of the Bishopgate Tower, looks absolutely incredible. It looks like a proper modern European skyline. Only thing I dont like is that this is sall going on in the City, they have to find some way to preserve all the histric buildings from getting destroyed. Otherwise whoever did the renderings on the page before this is amazing.

DarJoLe
June 8th, 2006, 12:33 AM
Only thing I dont like is that this is sall going on in the City, they have to find some way to preserve all the histric buildings from getting destroyed.

The only buildings being destroyed for these towers are 1960s-1980s blocks that aren't exactly architectural wonders. Far from it in fact.

if anyone dared propose demolishing something historical to build a skyscraper in London they'd be quickly shown the door.

NothingBetterToDo
June 8th, 2006, 03:11 AM
^^ to be honest Historical buildings do get demolished to make way for new developments.....isn't part of spittlefields market going to be demolished, to be replaced some vapid, banal glass box???

But its not skyscrapers that threaten historic buildings in London, far from it, its the low rise groundscrapers that are squashed into their sites that pose the most risk to old buildings.

Tubeman
June 9th, 2006, 12:40 AM
It is closer than in real life than in the rendering, the river bends round and goes between the tower and the City cluster.

But anyway, London Bridge Tower is so sublime and elegant it holds its own and doesn't need a cluster. In fact, it wouldn't look half as good as part of a cluster.

I feel the same about SwissRe... Every time I see it from Waterloo Bridge I want to blow up St Helens. It deserves better than to be next to a box... I like St Helens, but something of SwissRe or LBT's quality and iconicness (?) needs to stand proud and isolated.

Its like putting a masterpiece half behind a blank canvas... or something

London
June 9th, 2006, 01:32 AM
If they can reclad the brown boxy building in a blue glass, they can sure reclad this one in a similar fashion - and maybe even increase its height!

london lad
June 9th, 2006, 11:54 AM
Theres nothing wrong with the St Helens (Aviva tower)- Its the best example of the internationalist style high rise we have in the UK. Its doesn't need a reclad or height increase. Im sure there was talk of listing it along with Centrepoint- although im not 100% sure.

Tubeman
June 10th, 2006, 03:13 PM
Theres nothing wrong with the St Helens (Aviva tower)- Its the best example of the internationalist style high rise we have in the UK. Its doesn't need a reclad or height increase. Im sure there was talk of listing it along with Centrepoint- although im not 100% sure.

As I said, I like it... Its aged very well.

What I dislike is that fact it obscures most of SwissRe when viewed from Waterloo Bridge, for some reason the dark box in front of SwissRe's glittering curves seems like a real affront.

wjfox
June 10th, 2006, 05:01 PM
Wasn't it reclad after the IRA bomb??

So the "real" age of the exterior is about 10-12 years (?).

wjfox
June 10th, 2006, 05:02 PM
Anyway, here's a nice pic of the City cluster, taken by Nat-Nat:


http://static.flickr.com/51/163553500_4d0d01a45a_o.jpg



:cheers:

wjfox
June 13th, 2006, 12:39 PM
New 43-storey tower planned for Old Street, on the northern edge of the City -


http://i6.tinypic.com/149wqq0.jpg

european
June 13th, 2006, 02:47 PM
Is that all what london does plan skyscrapers and never build them.

I am sick of this.

At least will you didnt start a new thread.

wjfox
June 13th, 2006, 03:00 PM
Is that all what london does plan skyscrapers and never build them.

I am sick of this.
London has quadrupled its number of skyscrapers in the last 5 years, and built the multi-awarding winning 30 St Mary Axe.

We currently have 8 buildings over 100m under construction, including a couple of 500-footers, plus the world's largest football stadium which features a 400ft arch; and many other huge projects around the city. In the next 6 months we can expect Shard London Bridge, Bishopsgate Tower, 122 Leadenhall and 20 Fenchurch Street to begin groundwork (this is pretty much confirmed now); in around 12 months we can expect Heron Tower, Beetham Tower and St George's Wharf to start; not to mention a huge number of midrises; plus tons of massive regeneration projects like Wood Wharf, Elephant and Castle, Greenwich Peninsula, Kings Cross, Stratford City and the Olympic stadium, etc...


At least will you didnt start a new thread.
I only start new threads for 150m+ towers. This tower on Old Street is only around 135m.

european
June 13th, 2006, 03:06 PM
London has quadrupled its number of skyscrapers in the last 5 years, and built the multi-awarding winning 30 St Mary Axe.

We currently have 8 buildings over 100m under construction, including a couple of 500-footers, plus the world's largest football stadium which features a 400ft arch; and many other huge projects around the city. In the next 6 months we can expect Shard London Bridge, Bishopsgate Tower, 122 Leadenhall and 20 Fenchurch Street to begin groundwork (this is pretty much confirmed now); in around 12 months we can expect Heron Tower, Beetham Tower and St George's Wharf to start; not to mention a huge number of midrises; plus tons of massive regeneration projects like Wood Wharf, Elephant and Castle, Greenwich Peninsula, Kings Cross, Stratford City and the Olympic stadium, etc...


I only start new threads for 150m+ towers. This tower on Old Street is only around 135m.

I cant be botehred to read all this. :sleepy:

wjfox
June 13th, 2006, 03:08 PM
I cant be botehred to read all this. :sleepy:
Why, because it might demolish your argument?

london-b
June 13th, 2006, 03:09 PM
I cant be botehred to read all this. :sleepy:

Why be so unpleasant eh?

london lad
June 13th, 2006, 03:50 PM
I cant be botehred to read all this. :sleepy:


My my someones a happy chap-

You know what to do next time then dont ya- dont bother clicking on this thread ;)

european
June 13th, 2006, 03:55 PM
Why, because it might demolish your argument?

I wasnt aruguing in the first place.

european
June 13th, 2006, 03:57 PM
Why be so unpleasant eh?

What you mean all i said was i cant be bothered to reall all this. how is that unpleasent?

And you know i was saying the truth anyway.

european
June 13th, 2006, 03:59 PM
My my someones a happy chap-

You know what to do next time then dont ya- dont bother clicking on this thread ;)

Yes i am a very happy chap.

BTW WTF are you to tell me not to click on this thread just because i dont lick moderators arse by agreeing with them all the time.

london-b
June 13th, 2006, 04:01 PM
What you mean all i said was i cant be bothered to reall all this. how is that unpleasent?

And you know i was saying the truth anyway.

Oh my God, get a clue...

wjfox
June 13th, 2006, 04:17 PM
Yes i am a very happy chap.

BTW WTF are you to tell me not to click on this thread just because i dont lick moderators arse by agreeing with them all the time.
For God's sake grow up, you immature little twerp. Jeez, this forum is full of people like you.

Zenith
June 13th, 2006, 04:18 PM
cant be botehred to read all this.

Its not his fault he cant read.

european
June 13th, 2006, 04:22 PM
^^them dry jokes there

Varenukha
June 13th, 2006, 04:36 PM
FYI European, in my experience the finest online dictionary can be located at the Merriam-Webster site:
http://www.m-w.com
You may wish to browse.

london lad
June 14th, 2006, 05:32 AM
Yes i am a very happy chap.

BTW WTF are you to tell me not to click on this thread just because i dont lick moderators arse by agreeing with them all the time.


I thought you said you were a happy chap & there you are getting all arsey & throwing a hissy fit- You cant be bothered to read this thread then do like I say & ignore the thread instead of coming back on here & being a knob.

I dont give a shit what moderators say & come on these forums because I happen to like modern architecture - you on the other hand write a derogatory comment about the thread & London skyscraper development in general (obvisouly ignorant as you would know why theres a lot of proposals but not much actual construction) so my simple advice was stay out the thread then.

european
June 15th, 2006, 12:44 AM
You guys are so geeky here on SSC writing all these big cooments, sometime i feel like a looser that i am registered to a forum which is full of loosers.

wjfox
June 15th, 2006, 12:47 AM
You can spend the next 24 hours in the Brig. Maybe you can think about changing your attitude.

Tubeman
June 15th, 2006, 01:02 AM
You can spend the next 24 hours in the Brig. Maybe you can think about changing your attitude.

Hey, he's too cool to care... We're all losers, after all! ;)

wjfox
June 15th, 2006, 01:03 AM
:lol:

Lance
June 15th, 2006, 01:50 AM
You guys are so geeky here on SSC writing all these big cooments, sometime i feel like a looser that i am registered to a forum which is full of loosers.


Whats a looser?

CrispyDragon
June 15th, 2006, 10:15 PM
I thought you said you were a happy chap & there you are getting all arsey & throwing a hissy fit- You cant be bothered to read this thread then do like I say & ignore the thread instead of coming back on here & being a knob.

I dont give a shit what moderators say & come on these forums because I happen to like modern architecture - you on the other hand write a derogatory comment about the thread & London skyscraper development in general (obvisouly ignorant as you would know why theres a lot of proposals but not much actual construction) so my simple advice was stay out the thread then.

london lad, you sound like someone I know - except you don't use enough exclamation points !!!!
at any rate, to stay on topic - I agree! this place is to discuss the architure and development, not make ignorant comments.

CD

european
June 16th, 2006, 12:07 AM
Hey, he's too cool to care... We're all losers, after all! ;)

Very true indeed

Tubeman
June 16th, 2006, 01:03 AM
Very true indeed

I see your 24 hours in the Brig didn't fix your attitude... have another 24 on us!

Now kindly stop returning to this thread if you have nothing constructive to add

www.sercan.de
June 21st, 2006, 11:13 AM
good for photoshop ;)
http://www.**************************/emirates9/images/image074.jpg

Nongkhai_tong
June 21st, 2006, 11:30 AM
wOw I would love to see London's future skyline..

Newcastle Guy
June 21st, 2006, 11:33 AM
Excellent picture!

Zenith
June 21st, 2006, 11:36 AM
anyone see the reports on tv about the Richard Rogers being the architecture TSAR appointed by Ken? And the report on 1930's souless surburbia and how they want to change/improve it?