View Full Version : Washington Post publishes pro-Baltimore article!


CU_rak
July 22nd, 2006, 08:45 PM
Buying Into Baltimore
Washington Transplants Are Streaming North to Grab Budget Prices

By Eugene L. Meyer
Special to The Washington Post
Saturday, July 22, 2006; Page F01

To hear Falita Liles talk, you would think she had died and gone to heaven. But all the University of the District of Columbia librarian has done is move from Washington to Baltimore.

Thousands of Washingtonians each year are moving north from the Capital City to Charm City, attracted by cheaper housing, ethnic neighborhoods and urban amenities they say are lacking here. The ex-Washingtonians have leveraged the appreciation on their D.C. homes to buy larger and, they say, live better in Baltimore.

for the rest, see:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/21/AR2006072100663.html


This is a huge article in the WP that was stunningly PRO-BALTIMORE, showing how the city has turned the corner and how Washingtonians are moving here not only because it's cheap, but because it's a great city. Despite my usual misgivings about having Washingtonians moving to Baltimore en masse, this article gives me a lot of hope for the future of Baltimore and the entire Baltimore-Washington region. While there is usually a lot of animosity and prejudice against Baltimore published in the Washington press, this article does a lot to accurately portray the city's revival to those who still see Baltimore for what it was, not what it is becoming. Bravo to the author for giving Baltimore it's props!

I especially like the ending:
I love how colorful Baltimore is," said Vivian Campagna, 34, a former Joffrey ballet dancer, and mother of Lila, eight months. "I loved living in D.C., but people are very real here. We like that it's rough around the edges. I think it's great people still smoke in Baltimore and you see people with tattoos, not trendy kids but part of the culture."

There is, amid all the exultation over moving to Baltimore, not a sense of loss over leaving Washington but one of slight foreboding, a fear that the increasing presence of Washingtonians could cause a change for the worse. Said John Campagna, "I hope we don't ruin it by moving up here."

jaysonjaz
July 22nd, 2006, 09:39 PM
I am not upset by Washington folks moving to Baltimore. Give them 5-15 years and all of those DC folks will consider themselves Baltimore folks who work in DC.

Thats a cool article. Thanks for the post

JAB323
July 22nd, 2006, 10:32 PM
Yeah, when I picked up the paper, I was shocked it had anything good to say. One person lives in Bolton Hill and commutes to Downtown Silver Spring.

panamaboy9016
July 22nd, 2006, 11:43 PM
Cool article! Thanks for the post.

wada_guy
July 24th, 2006, 12:58 AM
The regular Post editors must be sick or on vacation. The Washington Post is almost always anti-Baltimore for some reason. That's why I buy the New York times for detailed national news instead of the Post.

CU_rak
July 24th, 2006, 06:05 AM
To tell you the truth, I think the NY times is more anti-Baltimore than the WP. Every single article I've ever seen on Baltimore or even mentioning Baltimore paints it as a crime and disease-ridden ghetto with nothing going for it.

wada_guy
July 24th, 2006, 03:35 PM
To tell you the truth, I think the NY times is more anti-Baltimore than the WP. Every single article I've ever seen on Baltimore or even mentioning Baltimore paints it as a crime and disease-ridden ghetto with nothing going for it.
As a newspaper junkie, I have to disagree with you. If you go to the Time's site and search on "Baltimore", you will find lots of positive articles concerning Medicine, City Governance, Travel, etc. That search returns every article where Baltimore is mentioned in the past 30 days. They love us. They love us even more because the Orioles have done so badly over the past 8 years.

I go to the NY Times site daily. I've seen way more positive articles in that paper about Baltimore than I have at the Washington Post.

Mike D
July 27th, 2006, 06:16 AM
As a newspaper junkie, I have to disagree with you. If you go to the Time's site and search on "Baltimore", you will find lots of positive articles concerning Medicine, City Governance, Travel, etc. That search returns every article where Baltimore is mentioned in the past 30 days. They love us. They love us even more because the Orioles have done so badly over the past 8 years.

I go to the NY Times site daily. I've seen way more positive articles in that paper about Baltimore than I have at the Washington Post.

Really? I'm surprised. I always felt the Times had counted out the NYC outer boros, Baltimore, Newark, Philadelphia and other cities. I always felt the Times had a pro-Yuppie and pro-suburban slant to its news. But I'm glad to hear that they love Baltimore. I visited Baltimore last month. Other than the hot weather and a couple of mishaps on the Light Rail, I enjoyed the city and I would happily visit it again. I'm also glad to hear that the Washington Post has something positive to say about Bmore.