View Full Version : Han River Project


mumbojumbo
September 27th, 2006, 01:59 AM
Han River Project to Enliven Seoul



By Kim Tong-hyung
Staff Reporter



Under the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s new urban development plan, the Chamsu Bridge will be changed into a pedestrianonly crossway as early as the latter half of next year.
/Courtesy of Seoul Metropolitan Government
The Chamsu Bridge, on the central section of the Han River, will become a pedestrian walkway from the later half of next year, the Seoul Metropolitan Government said yesterday.
The change is part of a five-year, 253 billion won ($267 million) urban development plan, which focuses on adding more open space and strengthening the leisure infrastructure along the Han River, which is known chiefly for its crude, concrete embankments and jungles of cookie-cutter buildings.

``We believe that the Han River is an important asset that we certainly could have better used in the past to make Seoul a more attractive city,’’ Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon said in a news conference held at Seoul City Hall yesterday.

``The idea is to redevelop the Han River area, making it the symbol of Seoul, and to have its beauty recognized internationally. It is important for us to make sure that the new project does not disrupt transportation and safety,’’ he said.

According to the plans, the city will spend 3.6 billion won to redesign the Chamsu Bridge, which is the lower half of the double-decked Panpo Bridge, as a pedestrian-only bridge. Jogging courses and bicycle lanes will also be added.

A 2,500 square-meter public park will be built at the southern side of the Chamsu Bridge, equipped with playgrounds and a water garden. There will also be coffee shops, a moorage and other public facilities.

The city will also invest 9.7 billion won to establish massive, artificial waterfalls dropping from atop the Panpo Bridge. The construction of the waterfalls will be completed around June next year, according to city officials.

Aside from the Chamsu Bridge, city authorities are planning changes to five other bridges to make crossing easier for pedestrians. Through the end of 2008, the city government plans to remove one car lane from the Yanghwa, Mapo, Han Kang, Tongjack and Hannam bridges and convert them into walkways.

To improve accessibility, the city will rearrange bus lanes to establish 14 bus stops on each side of the five bridges.

The city also plans to experiment with transport on the Han River. From the latter half of next year, city authorities will establish a water-shuttle service using amphibious vehicles, which they hope to foster as a tourist attraction in coming years.

Additionally, Oh said the city plans to come up with a ``master plan’’ sometime during next year to establish a water transportation system that connects the Han River with the country’s western coast.

Authorities are considering creating ``waterfront towns’’ in areas such as Magok, Noryangjin and Tangin-ri and building transportation terminals on Han River’s major tributaries, such as the Anyang stream and Tanchon stream.

Sister Ray
September 27th, 2006, 03:59 AM
I guess it is good that they are attempting to improve the banks of the Han.
At present the river does surprisingly little to improve the aesthetics of Seoul.
I am not sure these measures will improve the situation that much. But it's a start. I think better landscaping of the park areas on the banks, nicer embankments and eventually all those featureless square apartments that run the length of the Han must go. Really the riverside should be showcasing Seoul's best architecture, but 95% of it is just featureless commieblocks. The land must be worth a fortune, it must be economically feasible to get rid of the boxes and put up first rate residential and commercial complexes. Ideally the bridges should all be replaced too. I took the ferry from Yeoeuido to Jamsil once, and every one of those bridges was an eyesore.
Anyway, it's good to hear the Seoul Govt. is trying to recover some of the lost potential of the Han. Best of luck to them.

The Cebuano Exultor
September 27th, 2006, 04:13 AM
^^ Yeah, exactly! If your suggestions come into fruitation, Seoul would be really similar to Shanghai!

************************************************************************************
SUGGESTION:

Here's another suggestion: Deepen the Han River so that it could be navigable by large ships. I mean, it is really a very wide river so, obviously, it only requires dredging works to deepen it and "Kapow!" the city can make full advantage of the river.

Ellatur
September 28th, 2006, 02:44 AM
how expensive is it to make a river deeper?

kyenan
September 28th, 2006, 03:39 AM
I guess it is good that they are attempting to improve the banks of the Han.
At present the river does surprisingly little to improve the aesthetics of Seoul.
I am not sure these measures will improve the situation that much. But it's a start. I think better landscaping of the park areas on the banks, nicer embankments and eventually all those featureless square apartments that run the length of the Han must go. Really the riverside should be showcasing Seoul's best architecture, but 95% of it is just featureless commieblocks. The land must be worth a fortune, it must be economically feasible to get rid of the boxes and put up first rate residential and commercial complexes. Ideally the bridges should all be replaced too. I took the ferry from Yeoeuido to Jamsil once, and every one of those bridges was an eyesore.
Anyway, it's good to hear the Seoul Govt. is trying to recover some of the lost potential of the Han. Best of luck to them.

Many of the apartments will be replaced. As I know, those boxes in Jamshil are going to be replaced with newer ones soon. However, although the new residential buildings are better looking than the old ones, they do not look as good as expected to my eyes.

However, it does not sound so realistic to replace ALL the bridges in Han River. I also think that many old bridges are aesthetically not most preferrable, but it is questionable if they all have to be replaced for the reasons solely aesthetic-based.

kyenan
September 28th, 2006, 03:43 AM
^^ Yeah, exactly! If your suggestions come into fruitation, Seoul would be really similar to Shanghai!

************************************************************************************
SUGGESTION:

Here's another suggestion: Deepen the Han River so that it could be navigable by large ships. I mean, it is really a very wide river so, obviously, it only requires dredging works to deepen it and "Kapow!" the city can make full advantage of the river.

The biggest reason that most Korean rivers are navigable is not since they are too shallow, but because the water volume difference over a year is too large. Deepening may not solve the problem as far as monsoon is going on in Korea.

Sister Ray
September 28th, 2006, 05:56 AM
However, it does not sound so realistic to replace ALL the bridges in Han River. I also think that many old bridges are aesthetically not most preferrable, but it is questionable if they all have to be replaced for the reasons solely aesthetic-based.

Of course, you are right. It is pretty unfeasible to replace all the bridges. It was just my observation that the bridges are very utilitarian in design, to put it politely.

Getting rid of the featureless rows of decaying apartment blocks and sprucing up the landscaping will make a huge improvement.

I was reading in the Korea Herald yesterday that the mayor wants to turn the Hangang area into some kind of international tourist attraction. This will take a lot of work. As it is at the moment, I don't think it's even worth the 15 min cab ride to see the Han. There are a lot of scenic rivers in the world, and at present, the Han is not one of them. Seoul city has totally squandered this beautiful geographic feature. I really hope they will make the most of what the landscape has offered them in the future. It could be SO much better.

panda70
September 28th, 2006, 08:01 AM
Of course, you are right. It is pretty unfeasible to replace all the bridges. It was just my observation that the bridges are very utilitarian in design, to put it politely.

Getting rid of the featureless rows of decaying apartment blocks and sprucing up the landscaping will make a huge improvement.

I was reading in the Korea Herald yesterday that the mayor wants to turn the Hangang area into some kind of international tourist attraction. This will take a lot of work. As it is at the moment, I don't think it's even worth the 15 min cab ride to see the Han. There are a lot of scenic rivers in the world, and at present, the Han is not one of them. Seoul city has totally squandered this beautiful geographic feature. I really hope they will make the most of what the landscape has offered them in the future. It could be SO much better.

Yeah, I agree with you 100%. But what can you expect from the civil servants of the 70's and the 80's when those commie blocks were going up? Korea wasn't in the position to create beautiful looking riverfront buildings - or beautiful bridges for that matter. I just hope that in the next 10 to 20 years, the commieblocks do go for good.

BOM
September 29th, 2006, 02:07 AM
In the next decade or two, I see Seoul and other parts of Korea begin to redevelop the ugly apartment blocks and such into more aesthetically pleasing buildings and parks.