tylerburbank
March 3rd, 2010, 12:17 AM
So is Guy's hospital getting a makeover too?
|
View Full Version : Shard / London Bridge Tower | Southwark | 309m | 72 fl Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
[37]
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
tylerburbank March 3rd, 2010, 12:17 AM So is Guy's hospital getting a makeover too? dreadathecontrols March 3rd, 2010, 06:23 AM blimey thats a mega quick mega column. Great abc March 3rd, 2010, 07:55 AM "core" blimey guvnor connorwilliams March 3rd, 2010, 09:39 AM Hey I'm new... I've been interested in the Shard for quite a while but have my doubts it'll be built by 2012 considering towers usually take around 5 years to be built - but the rate that central column is rising is quite amazing. But one thing I've realised it that it needs some more medium/tall, modern towers around it and that it would also need some space - the immediate houses around it look very shabby. Atmosphere March 3rd, 2010, 10:02 AM http://www.spacy.me/forum/shard-side-view2.jpg The new columns are visible on the webcam now :banana: cybertect March 3rd, 2010, 10:27 AM Phone cam shot from platform 14 of London Bridge Station this morning http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97002-2/20100303_0001.jpg Level 18 is now clear below the rig. dronkula March 3rd, 2010, 11:06 AM Hey I'm new... I've been interested in the Shard for quite a while but have my doubts it'll be built by 2012 considering towers usually take around 5 years to be built - but the rate that central column is rising is quite amazing. But one thing I've realised it that it needs some more medium/tall, modern towers around it and that it would also need some space - the immediate houses around it look very shabby. Personally, I think it'll be externally complete by spring 2012 with the internal fit out taking the rest of the year. I would suspect that priority for the internal fitout would be the hotel as they'll want to be open for a certain major sporting event happening in London at the end of July/Start of Aug whereas the TfL offices are more likely to sorted later as I doubt they'll be too eager to try and keep London moving during those two weeks *and* also trying to find out where the pens are now kept in their new home. The mega-expensive apartments will probably be done slowly after the hotel is sorted to allow people to work with the contractors to design the apartment they want. teemac March 3rd, 2010, 11:22 AM Unfortunately I don't count any of those buildings. I do not believe any of those you listed would be known for their archoitecture, or as famous London buildings outside of the UK. Indeed many of them wont even be known by Londoners! I hardly think people come to London to stand in ore of Waterloo Bridge, Centrepoint or The Royal Festival Hall ( Well known as a venue, iconic, no) However people do want to come and see The London Eye,and will want to see the Shard. (Which I see as a long awaited response to the Eifle Tower:)) I admire your loyalty to some of those buildings but they are really not what identifies London to Visitors! Ironically you missed one of the very few great developments of the centuary - though still not known outside of London - the Barbican!! You may well be right about which buildings are well known outside the UK and I am sure that it is sad but true, for example, that millions of Londoners who have never heard of Charles Holden walk through his underground stations every day without recognising their quality which IMO is every bit as great a contribution to London's public space as any other building or buildings, and I certainly stand in awe of them.They are certainly a greater testament to the civilising influence of good architecture than the Eiffel Tower, which like most of Paris is merely grandiose, again IMO.My point was simply that there are other ways of judging what counts as good heritage than the test of what is well known and what the tourists come to see,indeed I think the views of those who live in and really appreciate London are more important.Of course,sometimes a building can be modern, well-known and of supreme quality ,and I agree with you that the Gherkin is one of those. I am probably annoying every other forum contributor by being so far off topic, for which I apologise, so I shall stop now,but it has been interesting hearing your views.:) cybertect March 3rd, 2010, 11:25 AM Well, if we're still on the topic of iconic London buildings, Paddington Basin is an 'iconic site' according to this PCSO (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/15/italian-student-police-arrest-filming) :D [/OT] Langur March 3rd, 2010, 11:32 AM Well, if we're still on the topic of iconic London buildings, Paddington Basin is an 'iconic site' according to this PCSO (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/15/italian-student-police-arrest-filming) :D [/OT]The police neeed to be stamped on hard when they behave like that. The officer at the centre of it should be sacked as an example to others. rhidian7 March 3rd, 2010, 12:02 PM It must be on floor 18 now, so over half way up Guy's. Cat man do March 3rd, 2010, 12:04 PM Oh dear - its a community support officer - not good enough to be a proper copper. Sigh. cybertect March 3rd, 2010, 12:06 PM It must be on floor 18 now, so over half way up Guy's. Yep Level 18 is now clear below the rig. ;) rhidian7 March 3rd, 2010, 12:25 PM Sorry Cyber, i should look first ey. Marky_boy March 3rd, 2010, 01:00 PM The police neeed to be stamped on hard when they behave like that. The officer at the centre of it should be sacked as an example to others. I accept mistakes can be made and they have to be careful what I don't understand is that after she was proved innocent she was still charged for their mistake. ibiza March 3rd, 2010, 02:24 PM Hey I'm new... I've been interested in the Shard for quite a while but have my doubts it'll be built by 2012 considering towers usually take around 5 years to be built - but the rate that central column is rising is quite amazing. But one thing I've realised it that it needs some more medium/tall, modern towers around it and that it would also need some space - the immediate houses around it look very shabby. Personally, I think it'll be externally complete by spring 2012 with the internal fit out taking the rest of the year. I would suspect that priority for the internal fitout would be the hotel as they'll want to be open for a certain major sporting event happening in London at the end of July/Start of Aug whereas the TfL offices are more likely to sorted later as I doubt they'll be too eager to try and keep London moving during those two weeks *and* also trying to find out where the pens are now kept in their new home. The mega-expensive apartments will probably be done slowly after the hotel is sorted to allow people to work with the contractors to design the apartment they want. actually in a years time this will be so far advanced externally that you guys will rather wonder how they will spend a full more year to finish this completely (it will be full completion in spring 2012). And let's not forget that internal fitout already starts long before external completion, we just had an interesting update on the Heron thread about that.. Skyscrapercarazeeee March 3rd, 2010, 02:52 PM It must be on floor 18 now, so over half way up Guy's. As i said earlier (and this to CYBER too),floor 19 is halfway up Guys (19=69.950 metres)!!!!!! Guys is 143 metres of course http://planningonline.southwarksites.com/planningonline2/DocsOnline/Documents/50966_1.pdf cybertect March 3rd, 2010, 03:02 PM As i said earlier (and this to CYBER too),floor 19 is halfway up Guys (19=69.950 metres)!!!!!! Guys is 143 metres of course Oh, indeed. I remembered someone had said something about that. It's one of the reasons I mentioned it :) Skyscrapercarazeeee March 3rd, 2010, 03:05 PM I guess the top of the rig must be 76 metres approx,so over halfway counting that ;-) If the floor number is included in images,its very handy for all to know current floor height :-) The Shard is getting quite close to 1/4 height cybertect March 3rd, 2010, 04:59 PM If the floor number is included in images,its very handy for all to know current floor height :-) I may be in a position to oblige that request a little later on this evening... Anonymous-scraperfan March 3rd, 2010, 06:47 PM I know this is kind of off-topic but didn't anyone have trouble getting to London Bridge this morning as the trains were kind of cancelled/delayed due to a fire of some sort... Octoman March 3rd, 2010, 08:25 PM A couple taken today : http://i48.tinypic.com/5wlg1c.jpg http://i47.tinypic.com/x3ve5x.jpg http://i50.tinypic.com/vh3ghu.jpg http://i47.tinypic.com/xlcsc5.jpg http://i45.tinypic.com/2i1lhz8.jpg http://i46.tinypic.com/2aficg5.jpg SELondoner March 3rd, 2010, 09:54 PM I have been told that TfL will take possession of its floors in late 2011. Don't know how long the client fit out will take (Palestra took a long time from possession to full occupation - fit out of kitchens, desks, IT etc.) but should be earlier than some of the posts above suggest. Andy_2008 March 3rd, 2010, 10:12 PM I have been told that TfL will take possession of its floors in late 2011. Don't know how long the client fit out will take (Palestra took a long time from possession to full occupation - fit out of kitchens, desks, IT etc.) but should be earlier than some of the posts above suggest. How could that be though, if the actual structure won't be complete at that time, surely the fitting out of that part would be a year or so later? bstl March 3rd, 2010, 10:17 PM I know this is kind of off-topic but didn't anyone have trouble getting to London Bridge this morning as the trains were kind of cancelled/delayed due to a fire of some sort... Ohhhhhhhhhh yes! When I first heard a 'building near London Bridge station had caught fire', I was praying it wasn't the Shard haha! Not sure how much concrete burns in reality though... :nuts: Anyway, great pics, Octoman, can't believe the height increase since I was there on Monday! nauticat March 4th, 2010, 01:04 AM Personally, I think it'll be externally complete by spring 2012 with the internal fit out taking the rest of the year. I would suspect that priority for the internal fitout would be the hotel as they'll want to be open for a certain major sporting event happening in London at the end of July/Start of Aug whereas the TfL offices are more likely to sorted later as I doubt they'll be too eager to try and keep London moving during those two weeks *and* also trying to find out where the pens are now kept in their new home. The mega-expensive apartments will probably be done slowly after the hotel is sorted to allow people to work with the contractors to design the apartment they want. Looks like you might be spot on with that suspision dronkula considering this article http://www.designweek.co.uk/pitch-due-for-hotel-in-the-shard-tower/3010586.article Cat man do March 4th, 2010, 01:06 AM If you use Cam 3 and measure across to the floors on Guys they seem to be doing about 1 Guys floor per day - at least within the perspective of the cam. cybertect March 4th, 2010, 01:34 AM Some pics from Wednesday lunch time. More from today in my Shard Gallery (http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/v/architecture/london/shard). General views of the core progress Banham Street, SE1 - to the east of the site a little south of the GLA building. http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97284-2/20100303_0254.jpg Platform 6, London Bridge Station http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97074-2/20100303_0129.jpg with a close-up of the numbers :) http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97044-2/20100303_0119.jpg St Thomas Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97266-2/20100303_0227.jpg London Bridge Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97122-2/20100303_0155.jpg On to the steel... St Thomas Street; a new level of columns. http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97248-2/20100303_0213.jpg Delivery at Gate 1 http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97212-2/20100303_0196.jpg being craned up top http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97218-2/20100303_0200.jpg Meanwhile, round on the station side, a little sequence of prep and fit a beam http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97086-2/20100303_0133.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97104-2/20100303_0140.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97134-2/20100303_0165.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97146-2/20100303_0168.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97176-2/20100303_0180.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97200-2/20100303_0191.jpg Taking a break http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97206-2/20100303_0194.jpg On a final note: of interest to shardcam watchers, I believe this is cam 3 (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=52297567#post52297567) http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97056-2/20100303_0124.jpg wjfox March 4th, 2010, 05:34 AM Thanks for the informative set of images cybertect. Soon be poking above London bridge from your perspective,harryposter. Tower Bridge. ;) rockdoctor March 4th, 2010, 07:20 AM I just had a leisurely curry watching the Shard construction from my 11th floor canteen. They were attaching new sections to the outer white steel columns on the station side - you can see these starting to appear in cam 3 (http://www.siteeyelive.com/monitor/shard/camputer120.jpg) Officer Dibble March 4th, 2010, 07:35 AM anyone into twitter might want to sign up to higher_ground (http://twitter.com/higher_ground)'s feed - s/he's tweeting some nice Shard pics... Mikey March 4th, 2010, 08:59 AM yeap, with its wlan high gain antenna connection to the top of guys tower! Atmosphere March 4th, 2010, 10:27 AM http://www.spacy.me/forum/shard-top-view3.jpg Are these new parts for some white columns or just floorparts? Headofcon March 4th, 2010, 10:47 AM Hi. I was just wondering when the first big reduction in core size may happen, so I thought I would re-watch some of the youtube animations to see that could shed some light. It seems to suggest that it wont be until about level 35. Can this be correct? surely there wont be any floor space left around the core at that height!!! Quick thanks to all those who take the trouble to post the photos I have enjoyed over the last 5 months. delores March 4th, 2010, 11:24 AM It's amazing the rate this is going up. Leeds Troll March 4th, 2010, 11:37 AM incredible! this is rising so fast, great construction workers lol! harryposter March 4th, 2010, 11:39 AM From my flat in Wapping, today at 10am: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/4405472953_7a766cf429_b.jpg Bonus photo, with the Strata on the left: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2680/4405461541_082d439643_b.jpg This thing is rising fast indeed, I reckon about one floor per day now! Officer Dibble March 4th, 2010, 12:23 PM http://i50.tinypic.com/qryvqh.jpg http://i48.tinypic.com/do9i5y.jpg Skyscrapercarazeeee March 4th, 2010, 12:29 PM Thanks for the informative set of images cybertect. Soon be poking above London bridge from your perspective,harryposter. Risen yet another 3 metres in 24 hours,so rig near 80 metres (floor 21 passes 80 metre mark). Think the top of this camview represents 210-230 metres.... So maybe it won't fit in the concrete core (to be 240 metres height).... http://i321.photobucket.com/albums/nn361/trex65million/camputer30.jpg Shardview77 March 4th, 2010, 02:17 PM Whilst I was enjoying a dose of food poisoning last night (courtesy of the Strada at More London), I noticed that they were still working on the Shard at 2am in the morning. Looks like they were pouring concrete well into the night then. rockdoctor March 4th, 2010, 02:24 PM I just had a leisurely curry watching the Shard construction from my 11th floor canteen. They were attaching new sections to the outer white steel columns on the station side - you can see these starting to appear in cam 3 (http://www.siteeyelive.com/monitor/shard/camputer120.jpg) ismail March 4th, 2010, 06:19 PM I visted the site today, after about 3 weeks, I can't believe the progress that has been made, It really is worth a visit, although the picture updtaes we get from Cybertec, etc are fantastic, you need to see the sheer physical presence this already has on the area Medo March 4th, 2010, 06:21 PM ^^Indeed, it already looks massive. From Waterloo Bridge http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/4727/shard0.jpg http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/1996/shard1u.jpg http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/29/shard2y.jpg http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/7677/shard3.jpg http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/3329/shard4.jpg http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/8678/shard5.jpg http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/4746/shard6.jpg http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8246/shard7.jpg Leeds Troll March 4th, 2010, 06:39 PM incredible! this is rising so fast, great construction workers lol! SE9 March 4th, 2010, 06:52 PM http://i46.tinypic.com/2whmhc9.jpg http://i48.tinypic.com/1zc9om.jpg Yorkshire Boy March 4th, 2010, 07:21 PM Something I've noticed about those pictures, is that how from that angle Guy's tower actually doesn't look too bad. ReDDevil9 March 4th, 2010, 07:23 PM http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/2662/nightshot.jpg Skyscrapercarazeeee March 4th, 2010, 07:31 PM Tower Bridge. ;) Ouch,i'll blame my tired physical state when i wrote that:bash: ;-) MEDO,those shots realy show Shard soaring already,and only approx 1/4 height Ejit March 4th, 2010, 07:39 PM Something I've noticed about those pictures, is that how from that angle Guy's tower actually doesn't look too bad. I generally think any angle where you can see the top it looks pretty horrid from. http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/7735/53916158.jpg (lol) Saw Shard for the first time today, it really does look big already. The webcams don't do it justice but the photos do, so thanks to those people for the regular updates :). Yorkshire Boy March 4th, 2010, 08:08 PM I generally think any angle where you can see the top it looks pretty horrid from. Well, the top looks horrid from anywhere but what I meant was that the proportions from that exact angle look way better than others. jimbo March 4th, 2010, 08:22 PM yikes - more than 1/4 up then! Aspidistra March 4th, 2010, 08:25 PM I visted the site today, after about 3 weeks, I can't believe the progress that has been made, It really is worth a visit, although the picture updtaes we get from Cybertec, etc are fantastic, you need to see the sheer physical presence this already has on the area I agree. I was wandering around there yesterday at lunchtime and the scale of the thing at ground level is just breathtaking. Looking at the pictures I get the impression, "Oh, the core's so big that there won't be much space on each floor", but nothing could be further from the truth, even with the tapering. This thing is vast! ellipse March 4th, 2010, 09:49 PM http://gickr.com/results4/anim_d91dbc33-1d89-6ba4-51fd-e8f277af0b96.gif (http://gickr.com) I made this quick GIF to get a sense of what we can expect to see from this newly discovered webcam. Whilst the render itself is pretty dodgy - I left out the blocky part at the base of the Shard - I used the planning docs to hopefully get the scale right. Skyscrapercarazeeee March 4th, 2010, 10:18 PM http://gickr.com/results4/anim_d91dbc33-1d89-6ba4-51fd-e8f277af0b96.gif (http://gickr.com) I made this quick GIF to get a sense of what we can expect to see from this newly discovered webcam. Whilst the render itself is pretty dodgy - I left out the blocky part at the base of the Shard - I used the planning docs to hopefully get the scale right. I think you've rendered the Shard toooo short. Floor 20/21 being formed now (=78-80 metres),so just over 1/4 height. Another 3 measures of the present core height to go,that camview top edge of frame represents no more than 240 metres,measuring up,some 70 metres under apex. BorderBoy March 4th, 2010, 10:32 PM Heron's top dog status ain't 'long for this world' at this rate.:) Curious to know how thick the walls of the core are? I imagine that they aren't that that thick given the speed of its ascent. ellipse March 4th, 2010, 11:26 PM I think you've rendered the Shard toooo short. Floor 20/21 being formed now (=78-80 metres),so just over 1/4 height. Another 3 measures of the present core height to go,that camview top edge of frame represents no more than 240 metres,measuring up,some 70 metres under apex. I adjusted it slightly. The concrete core (240m) now ends about top of frame. http://gickr.com/results4/anim_1447e2db-5ec8-6874-490e-52421b895d58.gif (http://gickr.com) harryposter March 5th, 2010, 12:04 AM Heron's top dog status ain't 'long for this world' at this rate.:) What you may not know though is that there are actually TWO Herons, look: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2799/4390114161_b3545c5487_o.jpg See? cybertect March 5th, 2010, 12:39 AM :D BTW, nice pics Medo. Aspidistra March 5th, 2010, 12:49 AM What a pretty heron! The eponymous tower had better gain its spire quickly if it ever wants to be the UK's tallest building - it seems it doesn't have long. gothicform March 5th, 2010, 12:50 AM the shard from the roof of ropemaker - http://www.skyscrapernews.com/images/pics/46TheShard_pic16.jpg jimbo March 5th, 2010, 08:44 AM good zoomage - or this week, should it be 'zuma'? What's the big elevated green space in the background - I'm presuming its Crystal Palace/Sydenham? Medo and SE9 - superb photos, thankyou - loving the fact that the core is starting to appear from such a multitude of locations. mrtcas March 5th, 2010, 09:01 AM Just past the site and it looks like some new steel arrived this morning. Sorry no pic. 2 Tricks March 5th, 2010, 10:06 AM SLIPFORM STOPPED @ 77 METRES !!! No movement now for around 6 weeks i've been informed :storm: Cat man do March 5th, 2010, 10:31 AM Well that's the way cookie crumbles .. we can watch the steel work climb now. Patience me'lad ;0) Peyre March 5th, 2010, 11:07 AM Well that's the way cookie crumbles .. we can watch the steel work climb now. Patience me'lad ;0) Exactly:banana: I think its a little cheeky just to accelerate ahead with the core. Pouring concrete into a core isnt hard, sure its happened quick and we've got to 20 stories, but we need the steelwork to catch up for it to make a proper impact on the skyline, people will say its a building, not just a big ugly concrete core with big steel legs.:nuts: Steelwork/floorwork= real progress! edtealdi March 5th, 2010, 11:34 AM SLIPFORM STOPPED @ 77 METRES !!! No movement now for around 6 weeks i've been informed :storm: There is something I don't understand, maybe someone can explain it to me. I have read a thousand times on this site and elsewhere that core pouring needs to be continuous for the structure to retain its integrity. Then how come they can stop for 6 weeks? Atmosphere March 5th, 2010, 11:39 AM There is something I don't understand, maybe someone can explain it to me. I have read a thousand times on this site and elsewhere that core pouring needs to be continuous for the structure to retain its integrity. Then how come they can stop for 6 weeks? Well the stop every weekend so it happens often. I think that it's only bad for the structure if something unexpected happens in the process itself. At what level will the steel be if the core restarts? Octoman March 5th, 2010, 11:47 AM The steelwork is the most interesting bit for me. Every level slightly different. Its amazing watching them put it all together like the worlds biggest 3 dimensional jigsaw. Plus with the steel you can actually watch it happening whereas the concrete work is largely hidden from view. The next month will be the best time to visit the site and watch it all happening. Huge amounts going on in full view and close enough to the ground you can see it all in detail. I'm going there today to watch for a bit :) Officer Dibble March 5th, 2010, 12:35 PM An optical illusion: from this angle it looks as if the Shard core and London Bridge House are in fact just one construction project - and it looks as if they're building another Guy's tower... http://i50.tinypic.com/263d4b7.jpg pixel2008 March 5th, 2010, 12:40 PM An optical illusion: from this angle it looks as if the Shard core and London Bridge House are in fact just one construction project - and it looks as if they're building another Guy's tower... Thank God it's only an illusion. One GT is more than enough. :lol: wawd March 5th, 2010, 12:55 PM it'd be cool if the core rose to it's full height without any steelwork. would look so slender :nuts: normal-thinker March 5th, 2010, 01:01 PM Maybe EH have had the last "laugh" and the plan has always been a 77m Shard....:nuts: tigerman March 5th, 2010, 01:25 PM There is something I don't understand, maybe someone can explain it to me. I have read a thousand times on this site and elsewhere that core pouring needs to be continuous for the structure to retain its integrity. Then how come they can stop for 6 weeks? I think thats just a misunderstanding because people saw references to 24hr continuous pour and put 2 & 2 together. The slipform is used because its the best and easiest way to construct this but there is no structural requirement for continous pouring. All they have to do is properly prepare the existing concrete surface to ensure an adequate bond to the next pour. This is how all concrete structures are made. If the 6 week hiatus is true then my guess would be that the core guys are going into the basement to construct the bottom part of the core. chest March 5th, 2010, 01:54 PM An optical illusion: from this angle it looks as if the Shard core and London Bridge House are in fact just one construction project - and it looks as if they're building another Guy's tower... http://i50.tinypic.com/263d4b7.jpg imagine the shame if instead of building the Shard they were actually building an exact replica of Guys Hospital - having to go on to the world forums to explain ourselves, having to have thread titles amended to 'Guys Hospital replica / Southwark / 142m / 34fl / U/C. tg1980 March 5th, 2010, 02:42 PM ^^ :lol::lol::lol: Xtremegamer March 5th, 2010, 02:44 PM Not being funny.. But we all take at face value a claim from someone who's only just signed up? :/ Peyre March 5th, 2010, 03:07 PM Im pretty sure there was always going to be scheduled pauses in the growth of the core. We were told this by an "insider" were we not? Xfire101 March 5th, 2010, 03:22 PM Not being funny.. But we all take at face value a claim from someone who's only just signed up? :/ Well we wont have to wait long to see if he is genuine, if its not got any higher by the middle of next week, he must be in the know... Yorkshire Boy March 5th, 2010, 04:39 PM Not being funny.. But we all take at face value a claim from someone who's only just signed up? :/ To be honest theres been a lot of posters that have signed up recently that (appear, at least) to be in the construction industry, and involved on projects all over London, so I wouldn't be too skeptical. ibiza March 5th, 2010, 05:19 PM Im pretty sure there was always going to be scheduled pauses in the growth of the core. We were told this by an "insider" were we not? absolutely. And it makes sense, too. Otherwise we would have a topped out core within a few months and nobody really expected that anyways. What rather makes sense it that they keep going with 24hour pours for a few weeks (which we experienced) while there at it already and then take a brake for another few weeks or even months so the workers can be allocated elsewhere and help the steelwork to catch up.. nrm the 2nd March 5th, 2010, 05:37 PM I think thats just a misunderstanding because people saw references to 24hr continuous pour and put 2 & 2 together. The slipform is used because its the best and easiest way to construct this but there is no structural requirement for continous pouring. All they have to do is properly prepare the existing concrete surface to ensure an adequate bond to the next pour. This is how all concrete structures are made. If the 6 week hiatus is true then my guess would be that the core guys are going into the basement to construct the bottom part of the core. To expand on this, if the pouring sequence is stopped each night then, especially on a core this size, there is a considerable amount of cleaning down and preparation that has to be done ready for the next days pour. One of the key elements to slipform is keeping the shutters clean. If the pour cycle is stopped then the concrete overspill etc would set to the shutters. If you then started pouring again the following morning with this still on the shutters then this would result in considerable structural problems as this dried concrete would drag with the pour leaving a finish of large areas with concrete missing. To stop the pour each night here would mean opening every shutter and carrying out an intense clean that would probably take all night so best hust to avoid this by keep going. Another reason this slipform has to stop now is that it has almost outgrown the cranes. For the cranes now to climb up they will need to be tied to the steel structure which at present isn't there so it has to allow the steel to catch up. mulattokid March 5th, 2010, 06:04 PM To be honest theres been a lot of posters that have signed up recently that (appear, at least) to be in the construction industry, and involved on projects all over London, so I wouldn't be too skeptical. you took the words right out of my mouth. This project is reeling in the big boys ismail March 5th, 2010, 07:14 PM you took the words right out of my mouth. This project is realling in the big boys He's not wrong, it has stopped for the next few weeks, may be not as many as 6 though. This will happen every few weeks. Stuff needs to be done in the basement, and in the core itself. Also keep watching the Shard cam from the top of Guys.......more later:cheers: Medo March 5th, 2010, 07:33 PM I was going through my imageshack account and came accross these pictures of the Shard site taken exactly one year ago: http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/2808/med7842.jpg http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/116/med7841.jpg http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7880/med7840.jpg Chief March 5th, 2010, 08:35 PM Not a great image, but an interesting viewpoint - as seen from the 15th floor of New Court: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/AtifR/NMR%20View/CIMG6471Large.jpg rickster2k March 5th, 2010, 09:06 PM Re the core, don't forget as someone else has pointed out, the cranes are of limited use now due to the core being higher than the cranes. We'll probably see the steel accelerate up the core now. mulattokid March 5th, 2010, 09:15 PM He's not wrong, it has stopped for the next few weeks, may be not as many as 6 though. This will happen every few weeks. Stuff needs to be done in the basement, and in the core itself. Also keep watching the Shard cam from the top of Guys.......more later:cheers: I was commenting on the fact that there are lots of 'on the project' newbies but still, good to know. Apoc89 March 5th, 2010, 09:33 PM Hi...I've been lurking on this site for a few weeks now, but after I took a few photos on a recent day trip to London, I decided that it might be time for me to register and start posting. I have two of the Shard...they're a bit outdated, dating from last Saturday, and the quality isn't amazing due to them being taken with a phone, so they're not as impressive as some of the other images you guys are posting here. One from the top of the Monument(a pretty good vantage point for checking on the Shard's progress)...also note The Strata in the background. http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o57/OverlordApocalypse/IMAG0028.jpg And another from the Thames Path between London Bridge and the Tower. http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o57/OverlordApocalypse/IMAG0039.jpg I have to say, photos and webcams don't do this thing's size justice...it was nearly half the size of Guy's Hospital when I was there. Hard to believe that this is only a fraction of the final product's height and width. I'll be following this project closely, and hopefully provide more photos if I find myself in London again. :) bandy March 5th, 2010, 10:09 PM Ive just noticed a couple of posts recently that gave the impression that some of the workers on site are able to do more than one specific job i.e. jump off the core and help with the steel work etc. I may have got the wrong end of the stick and may missed something so please forgive me if thats the case and im insulting your understanding but otherwise i just wanted to state the obvious to those that do not have any idea about construction. There are specific people who do a specific job (contractors) who are trained to do a job. So the workers on the core will stick on the core whilst other skilled workers will continue working on the basements. The steel erectors will continue to work on the steel etc etc. Obviously the core has to stop at this level so that the steel work can be brought up and then the cranes be connected to the superstructure then cranes can be raised and continue to service the core as has already been stated earlier. So it makes sense that the workers working on the large core can now jump off and possibly start on the other smaller core (makes no sense to send them home or on another job) at this stage in the schedule, and it makes sense to schedule the smaller core to be started in with the break in the larger core, although i must admit there are so many other variables in contruction! But as long as there is labour then there is no reason why many different things cant continue at the same time. Once the cranes are connected and raised then im sure large core, basements, steelwork, smaller core (labour permitting) internal fitouts etc can continue at a rapid pace. Just for those who have no clue on constuction. When a large contractor like mace wants something to be built at a rapid pace it will be done. There is no reason why workers have to stop at something and help with something else so as to 'catch up'. Cat man do March 5th, 2010, 10:14 PM Yup I remember at BT years back they were introducing (much to the unions agravation) the concept of multi-skilling. Up to then field engineers either went up poles or clambered underground (moles or poles). If you had a fault that involved going up a pole and a 'downunder' man arrived that was it mate. He'd have to reschedule. bandy March 5th, 2010, 10:26 PM Poles do seem to mess things up for the british constuction industry :lol: Sorry ignore that joke, my wife is polish! Jack of all trades master of none is now considered a bit of a cow boy on buiding sites of big contractors. You have to show you have a specific skill now, usually you will have a c.i.s card with the qualifications of your specific skill, otherwise your not let on the job. Never used to be like that, though not much has changed, infact skill levels were higher years ago. cybertect March 6th, 2010, 12:32 AM Final update of this week from me, and my last for a short while as I'll be out of town next week. One of my regular viewpoints: St Thomas Street/Bermondsey Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97452-2/20100305_0017.jpg and from the other side of the site at the junction of St Thomas Street with Borough High Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97584-2/20100305_0089.jpg highlights of today's action that I could see at lunch time... New steel level on the eastern side of the site; this viewed from St Thomas Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97458-2/20100305_0021.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97470-2/20100305_0023.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97464-2/20100305_0022.jpg Some large white blocks were being carted into the basement by hand. I'm assuming they're for insulation down below. http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97482-2/20100305_0035.jpg This mysterious plywood cube has appeared in the recesses of the station side of the site. Looks like shuttering of some kind... http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97488-2/20100305_0037.jpg You can have a lot of photographic fun with fairly abstract shots of this steel frame in construction. I'm trying not to post a whole bunch of them :) http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97506-2/20100305_0045.jpg Today's human interest section Part 1 - steel erector http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97524-2/20100305_0049.jpg Part 2 - hoisting steel off a lorry sequence http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97536-2/20100305_0053.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97542-2/20100305_0058.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97548-2/20100305_0060.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97554-2/20100305_0064.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97560-2/20100305_0065.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97566-2/20100305_0069.jpg P.S. Every time I've been to the site this week I have been gobsmacked by the volume of steel that is being fitted to what is quite a complex structure. These guys are doing a cracking job. scrapercrazy March 6th, 2010, 12:36 AM Not sure if this has been said before but forgetting the issue of steelwork and crane heights you also have issues with curing times of the poured concrete. The length of the curing period depends upon the properties desired and upon atmospheric conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and wind velocity. We are in winter at the moment so ambient temperatures are pretty low hence curing times will be lengthened over that of summer. Ok accelerators can be used which I imagine they are but these too have inherent issues with strength of the final product. So considering the total load on the base of the core curing must be allowed to take place before continuing higher. However am I sad at the prospect of a pause....nope...this is a marathon not a 100m sprint. We have plenty of good times ahead with this project and I for one will relish every single update posted. Again many thanks for all the photos especially cybertech etc. ismail March 6th, 2010, 12:48 AM Re the core, don't forget as someone else has pointed out, the cranes are of limited use now due to the core being higher than the cranes. We'll probably see the steel accelerate up the core now. By the time the core starts to rise again, the crane issue will be resolved..............keep watching:cheers: The Spikey One March 6th, 2010, 03:34 PM By the time the core starts to rise again, the crane issue will be resolved..............keep watching:cheers: :applause::okay: Slip stopped, bit of a celebration:drunk:Godawful hangover, see you all soon, going to sleep for at least a week. Cat man do March 6th, 2010, 03:53 PM By the time the core starts to rise again, the crane issue will be resolved..............keep watching:cheers: Hummm - don't suppose a nice TC5 is going to slip into that hole up there at the back right of the core? Or just wishful thinking maybe. Cranesetc March 6th, 2010, 05:59 PM If another crane appears for the core I would expect it to be perched on top of any step-in so it is independant of the slipform and can be tied to the core as it rises. ismail March 6th, 2010, 09:53 PM If another crane appears for the core I would expect it to be perched on top of any step-in so it is independant of the slipform and can be tied to the core as it rises. Comming soon to a tower near you.... Anyway, i'm of to somewhere hot for a short trip, so no more posts from me until next Thursday BorderBoy March 6th, 2010, 11:02 PM From Southwark Tube ... Palestra to right: http://i697.photobucket.com/albums/vv339/BorderBoy3/shard2-2.jpg http://i697.photobucket.com/albums/vv339/BorderBoy3/shard1-3.jpg Cat man do March 6th, 2010, 11:15 PM ...so no more posts from me until next Thursday Ahhh the real reason why they stopped work on the core. Jolly decent of them! Cat man do March 6th, 2010, 11:16 PM If another crane appears for the core I would expect it to be perched on top of any step-in so it is independant of the slipform and can be tied to the core as it rises. Surely it will make just as much sense to put it down a lift shaft - no need for any bracing and it gets easier all round coverage. Cranesetc March 7th, 2010, 10:53 AM Surely it will make just as much sense to put it down a lift shaft - no need for any bracing and it gets easier all round coverage. Yes it could be done, if the shaft is big enough because it would have to accomodate the crane mast and the slipform rig to form the walls of the shaft the crane is in. For a driver being able to see down to the ground he would be better off to one side. scarydan March 7th, 2010, 12:57 PM i found a realy good link to u tube about the construction proces. i think the schedule is a bit out but gives a good look at the construction proces. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WYKyCrK9tM&feature=fvw Cat man do March 7th, 2010, 01:35 PM ^^ Yea, its been shown before but always good to see it again. Interestingly it shows the central crane being installed at about the same height as the core is in reality so furthering evidence that we're about to see TC5. DrewHallam March 7th, 2010, 02:15 PM i found a realy good link to u tube about the construction proces. i think the schedule is a bit out but gives a good look at the construction proces. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WYKyCrK9tM&feature=fvw We've seen this before. It's not very accurate either, it has the steelwork up to level 15 by now. I think this is just a wishfull thinking. if it's an accurate work plan then they are woefully behind schedule. wawd March 7th, 2010, 02:44 PM guess what i went up today! http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4066/4413752462_c61f751303_b.jpg top of the core: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2792/4413762264_b23b5bbbdb_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4070/4412986009_915af02469_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4413760898_50809f5e76_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4021/4413755198_577ec4cef8_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4020/4412988903_077f67becb_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4037/4412990189_7ae99403f0_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4037/4412991805_af00759e3f_b.jpg wawd March 7th, 2010, 03:02 PM some crane porn: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4016/4413763892_39df8101ba_b.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2758/4413765092_80d791137d_b.jpg close up of the flooring: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2755/4412998363_e5ebe6d697_b.jpg mulattokid March 7th, 2010, 03:03 PM What fantastic shots there! Especially looking across to the city. wawd March 7th, 2010, 03:07 PM cheers Mark, i've got more coming across the various threads... bstl March 7th, 2010, 07:06 PM Some more shots from yesterday: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/4414297730_da9f9182c8_b.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2721/4413516163_5c80a31cbb_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4011/4413512679_0ee418cf45_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4042/4413508377_eb74234b52_b.jpg scrapercrazy March 7th, 2010, 08:44 PM Wow thanks Wawd great shots thankyou:cheers: chilliz March 7th, 2010, 09:16 PM why does the metal look rusted :P? Cat man do March 7th, 2010, 09:22 PM why does the metal look rusted :P?Because ... it is rusty! :crazy2: [sorry - completely irelevant smiley] chilliz March 7th, 2010, 09:26 PM Thought the metal would have been new ^^ Cat man do March 7th, 2010, 09:51 PM If its not treated it wil show signs of rust very quickly. Once embedded into the building it'll be fine. Honest! chilliz March 7th, 2010, 09:59 PM lol kk sorry :P Ejit March 7th, 2010, 10:03 PM Wasn't it said that the rusted metal was temporary? Some more shots from yesterday: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/4414297730_da9f9182c8_b.jpg Wow, wasn't expected to see those 3/4 in the same photo. Great updates.:) BorderBoy March 7th, 2010, 11:21 PM Mar Terra, bottom right, behind Palestra, does excellent Tapas. :cheers: mulattokid March 8th, 2010, 08:22 AM lol kk sorry :P Railway tracks rust after about 1 day of idleness. dddes March 8th, 2010, 10:51 AM New London Architecture: Conference on Bankside & London Bridge, James Sellar, CEO of Sellar James Sellar discusses 'The Shard of Glass' which is currently under construction, and once completed in 2012 will be the tallest tower in London. James Sellar CEO predicts that the viewing gallery will attract around a million visitors a year, therefore playing an important role in attracting tourism, as well as providing prime office space. http://www.gleeds.tv/index.cfm?video=657 ReDDevil9 March 8th, 2010, 01:43 PM Looks like the crane nearest to cam 2 is being jacked up:banana: Ciudad Bristol March 8th, 2010, 02:01 PM If its not treated it wil show signs of rust very quickly. Once embedded into the building it'll be fine. Honest! They don’t mind a bit of rust because the steel takes paint better with it so they leave it. Cat man do March 8th, 2010, 02:12 PM They don’t mind a bit of rust because the steel takes paint better with it so they leave it. That's an interesting point, thinking about it - it makes sense. Will they get a fireproof coating? eddyk March 8th, 2010, 02:16 PM Isn't it the law that steel be fireproofed? wawd March 8th, 2010, 05:44 PM some more from the weekend: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4070/4412982415_48cdf4ab2f_b.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2764/4413749112_92af2e021b_b.jpg the bridge was closed off and two workers were telling people to walk right underneath the bridge as works were being carried out directly above: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4413751208_918770c970_b.jpg new crane bit? http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4010/4413859818_8216552b51_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4029/4413091873_618f6812de_b.jpg Mikey March 8th, 2010, 08:07 PM in the last shot you can clearly see how tower cranes are extended... the sections have been jacked apart and the new bit is waiting to be slotted in :) wawd March 8th, 2010, 08:09 PM i thought it had something to do with that, thanks for the enlightenment Mikey! chest March 8th, 2010, 09:22 PM great set of updates Wawd on all the threads, still using the trusty Lumix fz18?- is it possible just to go up to the top of Guys? or do you need medical appointments. rickster2k March 8th, 2010, 09:40 PM Brilliant update Wawd. I do find it fascinating how the new sections of the crane are just slotted in. I wonder how long until we see climbing frames on the other 3. Jec69 March 8th, 2010, 11:12 PM cheers Mark, i've got more coming across the various threads... no more pics of lads in their cabs! steppenwolf March 8th, 2010, 11:50 PM http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4071/4418429480_d5fc204294_b.jpg Sunday wawd March 9th, 2010, 12:02 AM great set of updates Wawd on all the threads, still using the trusty Lumix fz18?- is it possible just to go up to the top of Guys? or do you need medical appointments. i'm still using the fx18 yeah, although you may have seen there are some tasty new models coming out in the next few months with 30x optical, manual zoom controls, and new post processing features like HDR etc, so i'll be upgrading soon! i just walked into Guy's and took the lift straight to the top. may have just been lucky but nobody seemed to notice/care. wawd March 9th, 2010, 12:06 AM no more pics of lads in their cabs! i'm sorry if i have caused some offense/embarrassment/invasion of privacy? you can just say if you would like me to remove anything... and don't worry i don't make a habit of taking pics of guys in crane cabs ;) Toetallix March 9th, 2010, 12:41 AM Flaming heck! I didn't actully realise just how tall this had gotten! Must be a good 70 to 80m at the very least, anyone reckon? Cannot wait for my trip there in Middle April to see just how tall it looks, expect many pics from me lol LiamF1 March 9th, 2010, 01:01 AM Wawd, I hope you don't mind me using a photo of yours from your earlier post, but you stood in an almost perfect position... http://liamhoughton.com/march2010.jpg http://liamhoughton.com/march2010small.jpg It's sure going to have a huge impact! ashlar March 9th, 2010, 01:01 AM OMFC! Aspidistra March 9th, 2010, 01:17 AM Those pics really bring it home to me how game-changing this is going to be for London. I've been to Chicago and seen what impact supertalls have on a city, but I still have difficulty making myself believe this is happening in London. And once we have one, that opens the doors to more. DrewHallam March 9th, 2010, 08:19 AM Those pics really bring it home to me how game-changing this is going to be for London. I've been to Chicago and seen what impact supertalls have on a city, but I still have difficulty making myself believe this is happening in London. And once we have one, that opens the doors to more. The Shard is tall and looks amazing and it is tall by any standards, but I don't think it can br classed as a supertall, surely this distinction is only for the tallest of skyscrapers... maybe 400m or 500m plus SE9 March 9th, 2010, 08:26 AM "The CTBUH thus defines 'super-tall' as being any building over 300 meters/984 feet in height." (http://www.ctbuh.org/HighRiseInfo/TallestDatabase/Criteria/tabid/446/language/en-GB/Default.aspx) london_marcus March 9th, 2010, 08:46 AM the core is starting to rise again RedArkady March 9th, 2010, 09:29 AM Awesome pic. Yeah it started to rise again mid-afternoon yesterday, but maybe slower than usual. Arky delores March 9th, 2010, 09:52 AM I wish the barrier of 309 m could be broken. Aspidistra March 9th, 2010, 01:14 PM Pretty sure the slipform has moved again overnight? Wasn't the steelwork supposed to be catching up? It seems resolutely stuck at level five on the south side of the tower? wawd March 9th, 2010, 01:18 PM Wawd, I hope you don't mind me using a photo of yours from your earlier post, but you stood in an almost perfect position... http://liamhoughton.com/march2010small.jpg course not, and what a fantastic prospect! it looks sooooo tall. great work! ChingfordFlanuer March 9th, 2010, 02:27 PM If I could post pictures onto this site I'd show you a this week/last week from the Euston Tower that shows progress. GRRR This baby is growing FAST. CF N4cer March 9th, 2010, 02:35 PM From The City (Great Tower Street)... http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4025/4419217207_e1eae30be9_o.jpg Skyscrapercarazeeee March 9th, 2010, 03:27 PM The Shard is tall and looks amazing and it is tall by any standards, but I don't think it can br classed as a supertall, surely this distinction is only for the tallest of skyscrapers... maybe 400m or 500m plus Oh dear dear me:ohno: 300m plus is officially supertall,and im freaking sure looking up 300m plus of vertical looks supertall enough!!!! Not many scrapers are above 400m in the world. Skyscrapercarazeeee March 9th, 2010, 03:31 PM Flaming heck! I didn't actully realise just how tall this had gotten! Must be a good 70 to 80m at the very least, anyone reckon? Cannot wait for my trip there in Middle April to see just how tall it looks, expect many pics from me lol 77m Aspidistra March 9th, 2010, 04:49 PM Oh dear dear me:ohno: 300m plus is officially supertall,and im freaking sure looking up 300m plus of vertical looks supertall enough!!!! Not many scrapers are above 400m in the world. Indeed. I believe if LBT were completed today, it would be the 40th tallest building in the world. That's got to count as supertall. Jec69 March 9th, 2010, 05:56 PM i'm sorry if i have caused some offense/embarrassment/invasion of privacy? you can just say if you would like me to remove anything... and don't worry i don't make a habit of taking pics of guys in crane cabs ;) Thank you for your understanding. I am sure no one will mind if you choose to take pictures of the site during construction, so long as they dont include shots of workers without their knowledge. Cheers Jec69::) Nightjar March 9th, 2010, 06:12 PM Indeed. I believe if LBT were completed today, it would be the 40th tallest building in the world. That's got to count as supertall. As far as I understand any building over 300 metres is classified as 'supertall'. DrewHallam March 9th, 2010, 06:24 PM Indeed. I believe if LBT were completed today, it would be the 40th tallest building in the world. That's got to count as supertall. I just looked om Wiki and you're right. That's amazing, I never would have thought the Shard is 40th tallest in the world. I take my previous statement back lol ibiza March 9th, 2010, 06:58 PM Thank you for your understanding. I am sure no one will mind if you choose to take pictures of the site during construction, so long as they dont include shots of workers without their knowledge. Cheers Jec69::) to be honest I think working on the most prominent construction site in Europe entails being taken on some snapshots. As long as people are not posting close ups of faces (whereas a closeup of the layout of a crane cab is eg. still something of general interest on here) I think that's totally harmless. It's virtually impossilble otherwise to take series of pictures as there's workers all over the site.. Madman March 9th, 2010, 07:41 PM Indeed. I believe if LBT were completed today, it would be the 40th tallest building in the world. That's got to count as supertall. hmm i think there are more than 40 towers 300m+ around the world. China +HK alone must have at least 20 completed i can think of let alone the US, AUS, Dubai.... Still, even if there are over a 100, they are still a rarity, especially in Europe :) Skyscrapercarazeeee March 9th, 2010, 07:42 PM TO IBIZA I agree.It'would be very time consuming if one were to ask permission of every worker if they minded being in photo shots of a rapidly ever more famous construction site ...that is the context to which our enthusiasts work for,and maybe the few (im sure) who take issue should understand that (written with a smile and wink) TO MADMAN,Shard would be near 40 if it were completed now i'm pretty sure,despite a growth in 300m plus increasing Austraila has very minimal supertalls for a start. Anyway,this scraper will be famous for what it looks like,as well as a very decent respectable soar Jerv March 9th, 2010, 08:30 PM Isn't it the law that steel be fireproofed? I don't thnk it is a law for steel to be fireproofed, however, it must be demonstrated that the steel retains a certain level of robustness under a pre-determined duration of fire condition. The thickness of the exposed lower level perimeter steel columns on this building would mean that fire-proofing methods such as encasement or intumescent painting would probably not be required. Astounded March 9th, 2010, 09:43 PM 0-KCzKKR94A Compiled from 31 webcam frames recorded in London 9 March 2010. Manchester Planner March 9th, 2010, 10:15 PM From Southwark Bridge yesterday: http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/8370/shard.jpg ashlar March 9th, 2010, 11:36 PM Compiled from 31 webcam frames recorded in London 9 March 2010. Soundtrack is a nice touch. :-) Toetallix March 9th, 2010, 11:56 PM Think it wil surpass that other building before it even starts coming down, will surpass the guys tower not too long after by the rate of things :) cheers for all the photos ChingfordFlanuer March 9th, 2010, 11:56 PM Bit of a tester here, my first attempt at a pic, here is my view of Shard from the orifice... http://i41.tinypic.com/2rmsdww.jpg CF Nightjar March 10th, 2010, 12:34 AM ^^ Looks like a Gerhard Richter painting. PS - I mean that in a good way. :) eXSBass March 10th, 2010, 12:38 AM If I am correct, that image was taken from the Physics building of QMUL? :) ChingfordFlanuer March 10th, 2010, 12:46 AM LOL - no the grotty old windows of the Euston Tower I'm afraid hence the painting like patina... Amazing views (unless you are a gherkin lover strangely). CF urban_foxx March 10th, 2010, 04:01 AM I remember that view used to work at the Euston tower a couple of years ago :) rhidian7 March 10th, 2010, 11:51 AM From the webcam i can see that no concrete has been poured in the core for th last couple of days, does anyone know why? mulattokid March 10th, 2010, 12:13 PM no more pics of lads in their cabs! Its a building site not an American Gay bar....Why is this an issue out of interest? All the workers are legal....are they not? shyness? In any case there will soon be hundreds of people taking pictures that will show just about everyone on site. ChingfordFlanuer March 10th, 2010, 12:19 PM I remember that view used to work at the Euston tower a couple of years ago :) Ah, what floor? (no names no pack drill and all that ;) ). CF Sesquip March 10th, 2010, 02:22 PM From the webcam i can see that no concrete has been poured in the core for th last couple of days, does anyone know why? To give the steel a chance to catch up. The tower cranes need tying back to the steel before they can climb again. rhidian7 March 10th, 2010, 05:16 PM Thanks. Octoman March 10th, 2010, 05:25 PM In any case there will soon be hundreds of people taking pictures that will show just about evryone on site. By then they will be 600ft in the air. You will only get photos of the soles of their feet. teemac March 10th, 2010, 07:50 PM I know that someone did an idiot's guide to posting pics on this site (or another skyscraper thread) quite recently, or so I thought. Unfortunately I have been back over all posts since November and cannot find it despite spending hours looking. I would like to give it a go because I finally managed to London Bridge for a close up look and to get some pics yesterday and while most are not very original I did manage one from what I believe is a previously unseen perspective,which may be of interest and which I would like to post.I should therefore be extremely grateful for advice on a real step by step basis as to how to do it, if anyone has the time.Please do not assume I will know anything in advance,Thanks. 1LONDONER March 10th, 2010, 08:11 PM I know that someone did an idiot's guide to posting pics on this site (or another skyscraper thread) quite recently, or so I thought. Unfortunately I have been back over all posts since November and cannot find it despite spending hours looking. I would like to give it a go because I finally managed to London Bridge for a close up look and to get some pics yesterday and while most are not very original I did manage one from what I believe is a previously unseen perspective,which may be of interest and which I would like to post.I should therefore be extremely grateful for advice on a real step by step basis as to how to do it, if anyone has the time.Please do not assume I will know anything in advance,Thanks. Hi, Check your pm's. delores March 10th, 2010, 08:51 PM It would be good to put 'posting pics' in a title somewhere so people could refer to it, or is that already the case? urban_foxx March 10th, 2010, 11:06 PM Ah, what floor? (no names no pack drill and all that ;) ). CF was just a casual worker there, used to work on 11 but mostly 3 about 7 years ago. you on either of those? teemac March 11th, 2010, 12:36 AM Hi, Check your pm's. err, sorry, pm's? (I did warn about not assuming I knew anything-I grew up in the steam age and am largely still there):ohno: Thanks for responding, though. 1LONDONER March 11th, 2010, 12:40 AM err, sorry, pm's? (I did warn about not assuming I knew anything-I grew up in the steam age and am largely still there):ohno: Thanks for responding, though. Personal Messages, top right of your screen when you are logged in, you should see 'Welcome teemac.' , and 'Private Messages' below. AUTOTHRILL March 11th, 2010, 12:42 AM Private messages (PMs) teemac March 11th, 2010, 12:53 AM Personal Messages, top right of your screen when you are logged in, you should see 'Welcome teemac.' , and 'Private Messages' below. Thank you,1Londoner-have found the message.Hope you see the pics before the core gets too much higher!:) (Hope they're worth it) Thanks also to Autothrill for shedding light in my darkness! Blackpool88 March 11th, 2010, 01:33 AM If I am correct, that image was taken from the Physics building of QMUL? :) haha I lived in the halls next to the Physics Department, Ifor Evans place and went up to the top once, amazing views, just about the only decent thing about that Uni! Light Parade March 11th, 2010, 10:20 AM A few shots from yesterday. Obviously the focus is on infilling steel at the lower levels, and it's fascinating to see how the Shard is being progressively integrated into the fabric of one of the oldest railway stations in the world. Although Shard Cam 1 is a bit dull at the moment, unless your're a cherry-picker junkie, it will be most interesting to watch the transport interchange coming into focus on those lower levels. You can't get close, but it's apparent that the underground work to the basements and to the base of the "backpack" are very substantial. http://i701.photobucket.com/albums/ww14/lightparade1960/Shardsteelb.jpg http://i701.photobucket.com/albums/ww14/lightparade1960/Shardsteel.jpg http://i701.photobucket.com/albums/ww14/lightparade1960/Shardsteelb2.jpg http://i701.photobucket.com/albums/ww14/lightparade1960/Shardsteelb3.jpg http://i701.photobucket.com/albums/ww14/lightparade1960/Shardcrane.jpg ismail March 11th, 2010, 12:18 PM If I recall corectly, the post tensioned 5th floor slab is due to start at some point in the next 2 weeks, once this slab is complete the steel will shoot up, untill it reaches the next P/T floor ( around level 35 I think). The core is having an internal stair case installed (you can just see the work going on through the access point, if you go to the site), and once this and TC1 are in place it will start to climb again. harryposter March 11th, 2010, 09:10 PM Personal Messages, top right of your screen when you are logged in, you should see 'Welcome teemac.' , and 'Private Messages' below. Exactly, not Prime Ministers...:lol: R0rschach March 11th, 2010, 09:22 PM Looking at the top down cam, looks like Level 6 floor deck is about to be laid out on the station side. Forb Noj March 11th, 2010, 11:15 PM If I recall corectly, the post tensioned 5th floor slab is due to start at some point in the next 2 weeks, once this slab is complete the steel will shoot up, untill it reaches the next P/T floor ( around level 35 I think). The core is having an internal stair case installed (you can just see the work going on through the access point, if you go to the site), and once this and TC1 are in place it will start to climb again. I realy enjoy your insightful comments. Helps make sense of the the timing of it all. Thanks. :bow: Officer Dibble March 12th, 2010, 12:43 PM http://i42.tinypic.com/2ymj8z4.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/dgqmae.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/2u5qd8y.jpg Cat man do March 12th, 2010, 01:53 PM Anyone curious about post tensioned floors as I was may be interested in this nice little article http://www.brmca.org.uk/downloads/POSTENSIONED_CONCRETE_FLOORS.pdf Astounded March 13th, 2010, 12:06 AM 7J6i1PWDjFE Forb Noj March 13th, 2010, 12:50 AM Two days ago there was still a lot of concrete debris coming up from the basement excavation and tonight at about 7.30pm there was a massive prop I presume awaiting installation down under! I suspect there is a lot of activity currently out of sight. Black Cat March 13th, 2010, 04:22 AM http://i42.tinypic.com/2u5qd8y.jpg One goes up as one goes down! Donkfest1 March 13th, 2010, 09:11 AM Anyone curious about post tensioned floors as I was may be interested in this nice little article http://www.brmca.org.uk/downloads/POSTENSIONED_CONCRETE_FLOORS.pdf Very interesting article. Thanks. Nihil Dicit March 13th, 2010, 11:24 AM A few pics of the steelwork from today... http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10034.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10033.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10030.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10028.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10019.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10020.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10018.jpg http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv295/nihildicit2/13Mar10022.jpg Msradell March 13th, 2010, 05:49 PM I find the design of the steel very interesting. We very seldom see beams with cutouts like many of these have here in the United States. Are they there to allow for passage of utilities or just for weight reduction and material savings? Newcastle Guy March 13th, 2010, 10:22 PM Great pics guys :) I've chosen the Shard as my private sector project for my procurement and contract interpretation coursework. I need to "analyse the client and client requirements then discuss the procurement option used". Can someone tell me what procurement method was used for the Shard? I'm assuming it was design & build. Any help would be much appreciated, I don't really have a clue what to talk about and I need to stretch this section of the CW out to over a 1,000 words :nuts: Cat man do March 13th, 2010, 10:54 PM Are they framed construction pics along the hoardings? Are they selling them! ffinybryn March 14th, 2010, 09:36 AM I find the design of the steel very interesting. We very seldom see beams with cutouts like many of these have here in the United States. Are they there to allow for passage of utilities or just for weight reduction and material savings? Bit of both Msradell, but usually for services (ducting & cables) to pass through. Gives better headroom per floor. More floors = more revenue. (cf "fabsec") If this is still accurate, http://planningonline.southwarksites.com/planningonline2/DocsOnline/Documents/50972_1.pdf the floors will be 3.65m apart. Heron Towers are 4.1m... __________________________________________________________ Is a well balanced Australian someone with a chip on both shoulders? eddyk March 14th, 2010, 11:58 AM http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/3638/28964854.jpg I had sometimes been reluctant to agree with the statement, 'it's in the perfect location'. But when I saw the core at the other side of London Bridge and from the eye. I just knew that it was it was in the most spot on perfect place. I imagine tourists in the eye instead of hanging on to the left side of the pods to shoot big ben, crowd around the right side to look at the shard. http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3334/11977727.jpg Also I hope DrewHallam doesn't see this pic. cybertect March 14th, 2010, 12:23 PM Can someone tell me what procurement method was used for the Shard? I'm assuming it was design & build. I doubt that highly, as Piano had the design done well before Feb 2009 when Mace were appointed as the contractor for delivery of the building. :) I assume it's fairly traditional contractually. Mace Contract press release (http://www.macegroup.com/sites/all/modules/tinymce/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/site%20images/press_releases/PR-09.02.24-Shard-construction-contract-signed.pdf), 24 Feb 2009 Mace Shard project page (http://www.macegroup.com/projects/project-library/shard-london-bridge) Mace carried out early project management services which evolved into construction management before a final evolution to a fixed price solution. The early demolition and enabling works are being carried out under a construction management contract and the main permanent works will be delivered under a fixed price contract. DrewHallam March 14th, 2010, 12:48 PM http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/3638/28964854.jpg I had sometimes been reluctant to agree with the statement, 'it's in the perfect location'. But when I saw the core at the other side of London Bridge and from the eye. I just knew that it was it was in the most spot on perfect place. I imagine tourists in the eye instead of hanging on to the left side of the pods to shoot big ben, crowd around the right side to look at the shard. http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3334/11977727.jpg Also I hope DrewHallam doesn't see this pic. At least it's in focus lol BeestonLad March 14th, 2010, 01:28 PM The procurement would have been Construction Management as Mace are really only consultants who would sub everything out Officer Dibble March 14th, 2010, 01:29 PM Latest from the Dibble bedroom window in Rotherhithe: http://i43.tinypic.com/16jkidw.jpg Newcastle Guy March 14th, 2010, 02:18 PM @ Cybertect & BeestonLad: Cheers for the help guys! :cheers: BeestonLad March 14th, 2010, 02:38 PM After doing a bit of research it appears that the procurement type is that of a Fixed Price contract even though Mace are a Construction Management firm. Found these two snippets... Mace was originally expected to build the Shard under a construction management deal, but concerns over funding led Sellar to approach Laing O’Rourke to ask about a fixed-price contract. Although Mace has previously worked on small fixed-price deals, it has never carried out a major project under the procurement route. http://www.building.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3100156 BorderBoy March 14th, 2010, 06:33 PM [QUOTE Also I hope DrewHallam doesn't see this pic.[/QUOTE] Maybe we should have a thread for 'arty' shots of London's buildings? :) Madman March 14th, 2010, 07:03 PM After doing a bit of research it appears that the procurement type is that of a Fixed Price contract even though Mace are a Construction Management firm. Found these two snippets... Mace was originally expected to build the Shard under a construction management deal, but concerns over funding led Sellar to approach Laing O’Rourke to ask about a fixed-price contract. Although Mace has previously worked on small fixed-price deals, it has never carried out a major project under the procurement route. http://www.building.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3100156 If its for a coursework and in order to show the most appreciation of contractual relations, i would also check carefully on the tendering process selected (possible two stage with bidding contractors brought on initially in a consultancy role?...), what JCT contracts were employed? etc Newcastle Guy March 14th, 2010, 08:14 PM Cheers guys! It's the first time I've done anything like this, I've only had a few lectures on it. Usually I would have tried to find it all myself, but seeing how wrong I was with my first prediction, I'm happy I asked you guys. Officer Dibble March 15th, 2010, 12:03 PM http://i42.tinypic.com/iwk9wh.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/2f054bq.jpg rhidian7 March 15th, 2010, 01:57 PM It hardly looks like anything is happening at the moment. darrense14 March 15th, 2010, 02:04 PM ^ Its actually going up very quickly - i work next door and its a constant hive of activity. In fact i'm surprised how fast the concrete core has gone up over the past few weeks - it doesn't seem long since it was just a hole in the ground. Cat man do March 15th, 2010, 02:07 PM From the cams at least it does look very quiet, can't see any yellow jackets and the cranes appear to be parked. Is it a day off? EDIT - OK - see a few now Atmosphere March 15th, 2010, 03:54 PM Man, the progress is still amazing. Look at the amount of steel beams that go up every hour. The steel of the new floors is now 2/3 done. rhidian7 March 15th, 2010, 04:13 PM I think i was used to seeing the core rise everyday and since that has stopped the steel is quite as obvious from the web cams. Like Cat Man Do said, there doesn't seem to be many people around today. cybertect March 15th, 2010, 04:25 PM From the cams at least it does look very quiet, can't see any yellow jackets and the cranes appear to be parked. Is it a day off? I had a look today as I'm back in town :) Most of the activity and new steel seems to be happening round the eastern side of the core and not obvious for most of the webcams. Pics likely to follow this evening. The Spikey One March 15th, 2010, 04:48 PM From the cams at least it does look very quiet, can't see any yellow jackets and the cranes appear to be parked. Is it a day off? EDIT - OK - see a few now ^^ : hilarious It's all happening in the core or down the 'ole out of sight. Last time I was down there there were at least 150 yelow jackets, steel, machines and allsorts flying around. And a nightshift. Apparantly they want to pour a bit of concrete in a few weeks.:dizzy: Barry_Scott March 15th, 2010, 05:40 PM i was there at lunch and noticed that the 360 at the far eastern side of the site (excavating the basement) has gone. Spikey, I assume you have done the digging and are in a maze of rebar down there getting ready for the pouring of the base slab? how many cubes going down there? Atmosphere March 15th, 2010, 06:35 PM Just take a look at some progress just from TODAY: http://www.spacy.me/forum/nosteel.jpg http://www.spacy.me/forum/steel.jpg As you can see that big gap on the right has now been filled with steel beams, and some new steel on the left half behind the core. nauticat March 15th, 2010, 07:24 PM Progress as seen from BT tower over the last month 1 Month ago http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4028/4365718468_82e213f20e.jpg Today http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4019/4435163835_4bc2186936.jpg mulattokid March 15th, 2010, 09:28 PM WOW! this is the quickest (I wanted to say erection, but its just seen as cheap) build Ive seen in a long time. I cant believe how fast this is. beleevme March 15th, 2010, 10:17 PM I on purpose didnt check this thread so the progress could surprise me... it certainly has :banana: cybertect March 16th, 2010, 01:07 AM brb AUTOTHRILL March 16th, 2010, 01:16 AM WOW! this is the quickest (I wanted to say erection, but its just seen as cheap) build Ive seen in a long time. I cant believe how fast this is. Hahahaha not often you see it go up that quickly eh? Bloody fast erection! cybertect March 16th, 2010, 02:43 AM [Had some database errors earlier... hopefully this will work this time] As promised earlier, some pics from today, with a few more to be found in my Shard Gallery (http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/v/architecture/london/shard) I've a feeling I'm going to be itching to buy a longer lens as construction proceeds :D Starting out with a couple of lesser seen angles on the core Platform 13, London Bridge Station http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97794-2/20100315_0001.jpg From Weston Street, to the south of the site - I expect the scale relationship to Guy's Tower to be reversed in due course :) http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97608-2/20100315_0147.jpg Leathermarket Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97602-2/20100315_0154.jpg and a closer circuit of the rest of the site... London Bridge Street - frame and floor have filled out since I last saw it, with a lot of secondary steelwork being added and another flooring level clearly under way above the one that now appears complete. http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97716-2/20100315_0114.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97722-2/20100315_0113.jpg The pedestrian bridge over St Thomas Street and Gate 1 http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97674-2/20100315_0127.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97698-2/20100315_0122.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97776-2/20100315_0010.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97788-2/20100315_0006.jpg Gate 2, east along St Thomas Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97662-2/20100315_0130.jpg A closer view of those new levels to the right of the tower crane in the pic above http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97644-2/20100315_0137.jpg Chap on a cherry picker tending to a plate that's been welded to the face of the horizontal element at the top of the white column http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97620-2/20100315_0143.jpg Some steel erection on the eastern side of the site behind Gate 2. http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97626-2/20100315_0142.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97650-2/20100315_0136.jpg Newcastle Guy March 16th, 2010, 03:21 AM Thanks! Light Parade March 16th, 2010, 10:30 AM Just take a look at some progress just from TODAY: As you can see that big gap on the right has now been filled with steel beams, and some new steel on the left half behind the core. Guys Shardcam is the one to watch - much more steel at SE corner of the core, they're going at it today. OMurphy March 16th, 2010, 02:41 PM Appears to be a problem with site cam 2, only half screen :( Shy Ted March 16th, 2010, 03:12 PM The cranes seem to be a bit short ismail March 16th, 2010, 04:46 PM The cranes seem to be a bit short The 4 cranes are there to help bulid the steel superstructure, so at the moment they are more than tall enough, once the steel hits the 15th/16th floor then they ( not all 4 ) will be tied in and raised. The core is getting it's own crane, which will rise with it. rickster2k March 16th, 2010, 11:11 PM Are we still sure that the core crane is going ahead? nauticat March 16th, 2010, 11:24 PM Popped by this evening and caught them hoisting up a huge piece forming an extension to corner of the steelwork & watched as they fixed in position http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2774/4439263710_e33f65cfd5.jpghttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4045/4438490173_72c85223f1.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2689/4438500873_27842f446e.jpghttp://farm3.static.flickr.com/2706/4439282348_7ab89b55e9.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4006/4439285682_0a3b3e46aa.jpg Curtains March 16th, 2010, 11:42 PM Stunning stuff, well done nauticat and the site workers. cybertect March 16th, 2010, 11:45 PM Nice catch :cool: Forb Noj March 17th, 2010, 12:15 AM [QUOTE=nauticat;53547587]Popped by this evening and caught them hoisting up a huge piece forming an extension to corner of the steelwork & watched as they fixed in position Hey you must have passed by a few minutes after I cycled past as they were just about to lift. Impressive hunk of steel. :) Cat man do March 17th, 2010, 12:16 AM Has anyone caught any of this steelwork heading down the A1 (or whatever route its taking). We saw a lot for Heron. BeestonLad March 17th, 2010, 10:54 AM I drive down the A1 everyday to work but haven't spotted any yet! Comdot March 17th, 2010, 11:16 AM this thread is going to be so full of spam soon. i can't even help myself.... stunning stuff. wish i was in england to see it. Cat man do March 17th, 2010, 11:54 AM ^^ Err why. Have you plans to inject a load of spam! Comdot March 17th, 2010, 01:33 PM not me, you lot. i would never ever be tempted to lose my inhibitiions (without later posting amazing pics and info to make up for it). :D come on, momentous event in london. just a bit of enthusiasm... Msradell March 17th, 2010, 03:49 PM The painters must be getting behind. It seems like a lot of the steel not be erected is not primed like all the early stuff was. It also seems very random what is painted and what is not? jimbo March 17th, 2010, 10:08 PM now the core has stolen a lead, we'll see the steel starting to rock up. Had a wander after work and its great to see the full form of the ground floors almost bulked out with the white steel work looking very similar to that we can see on the renders. I love the fact that this will be changing on an almost daily basis and gradually inching its way into so many views of London. The topped out core, looking like a concrete stump will look menacing to many, but imagine when its all complete and shiny and new! cybertect March 18th, 2010, 12:24 AM I thought I really had to go look at those new columns today, what with the weatherman promising rain for the end of the week and all... [as usual, more from today's pics in my Shard Gallery (http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/v/architecture/london/shard)] Peeking up St Thomas Street http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97842-2/20100317_0013.jpg From the entrance to Guy's on the pedestrian bridge http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97932-2/20100317_0032.jpg Closer to http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97908-2/20100317_0028.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/98016-2/20100317_0058.jpg One curiosity that caught my eye - a couple of steel guys apparently removing one of the diagonal bracing members of the 'temporary' frame facing St Thomas Street. There was a lot of whacking it with a sledgehammer. http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/98028-2/20100317_0063.jpg A couple of other photos I liked, just for kicks http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97962-2/20100317_0041.jpg http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97836-2/20100317_0012.jpg Skyscrapercarazeeee March 18th, 2010, 01:22 AM Taken yesterday http://i321.photobucket.com/albums/nn361/trex65million/NHMbraincaseLondon1632010035.jpg http://i321.photobucket.com/albums/nn361/trex65million/NHMbraincaseLondon1632010036.jpg http://i321.photobucket.com/albums/nn361/trex65million/NHMbraincaseLondon1632010032.jpg http://i321.photobucket.com/albums/nn361/trex65million/NHMbraincaseLondon1632010037.jpg rickster2k March 18th, 2010, 10:02 AM Thanks for all you're updates on this, Bish and Heron. BeestonLad March 18th, 2010, 11:16 AM From the entrance to Guy's on the pedestrian bridge http://www.cybertects.co.uk/gallery2/d/97932-2/20100317_0032.jpg Great photos Cybertect What is with these tubular diagonal steel members? They must be all temporary otherwise they would get in the way of the floor plates. It must be so they can continue to have access below as they dont seem to have installed all the columns in this corner? ismail March 18th, 2010, 03:00 PM Great photos Cybertect What is with these tubular diagonal steel members? They must be all temporary otherwise they would get in the way of the floor plates. It must be so they can continue to have access below as they dont seem to have installed all the columns in this corner? You have answered your own question, all the rust coloured steel is temp support during construction LittleTex March 18th, 2010, 03:53 PM http://i321.photobucket.com/albums/nn361/trex65million/NHMbraincaseLondon1632010035.jpg THAT IS AMAZING! Splish March 18th, 2010, 03:57 PM I was there around 15:30 yesterday afternoon, I was surprised how large it was in real life compared to the photos. The core is massive :) Saw someone taking a load of photos of it but was a tad apprehensive to introduce myself as 'Splish' :lol: It certainly generates a lot of interest though - there were a lot of people standing on the bridge watching it for a while. Aspidistra March 18th, 2010, 06:03 PM They've changed the angle on the cam looking down from Guy's tower. Now we get a most fascinating view of more of the square mile, and less of the steel work. *fail* Aspidistra March 18th, 2010, 06:38 PM Scrap that - it's been moved back again. Did anyone else see that, or am I going mad? Maybe a big seagull was sitting on it for a while? elskapel March 18th, 2010, 07:28 PM http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4005/4443717498_f2bcffb6b1_b.jpg RedArkady March 18th, 2010, 07:40 PM Aspidistra - that has happened before so you may not be insane. |