View Full Version : ROTTERDAM | Zalmhaeve | 171m | Pro
Skyscrapercitizen
December 20th, 2006, 12:12 PM
We have a first artist impression of this tower. Construction should start later in 2007, and this is likely to become the next tallest of The Netherlands. (Tallest is now Montevideo, 152 m and we have 165 m Maastower UC).
In my opinion it is a NYC style and NYC scale project, I love it. It is part of a bigger project with some nice midrises up to 70 meters.
Total numer of appartments for the project is 700!
The Artist Impression by Dam Architects:
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/9243/zalmhavenue7.jpg
Skyscrapercitizen
December 20th, 2006, 12:15 PM
Some older impressions, just showing the mass:
http://207.44.228.232/images/B04/4140.jpg
http://207.44.228.232/images/B04/4284.jpg
The location by Jan, the project will replace the blue/white building in the middle bottom of the pic:
http://skyscrapercity.com/database/buildings.02/2336.jpg
Skyscrapercitizen
December 20th, 2006, 12:17 PM
Quote with pictures of the model of this project:
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200608.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_01032006.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200602.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200603.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200604.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200605.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200606.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200607.jpg
Skyscrapercitizen
December 20th, 2006, 12:21 PM
And another quote of Marin with pics of the 3D computermodel:
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200613.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200614.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200615.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200616.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200617.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200618.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200619.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200620.jpg
http://207.44.228.231/marin/Gedempte Zalmhaven_0103200621.jpg
Skyscrapercitizen
December 20th, 2006, 12:23 PM
Project in the model of our City Information Center:
http://207.44.228.232/images/B04/4360.jpg
http://207.44.228.232/images/B04/4361.jpg
http://207.44.228.232/images/B04/4362.jpg
http://207.44.228.232/images/B04/4363.jpg
CborG
December 20th, 2006, 04:18 PM
Not the best design ever, the setbacks are ok, but there's no way im gonna complain. It's 171 meters after all:cheers:
Erebus555
December 20th, 2006, 04:25 PM
I actually really like this. The set backs are unusual and I love that part! Not you average box and its a good height.
Dr. Dubai
December 20th, 2006, 06:15 PM
Not that bad at all!:)
Great height for Rotterdam of course, temporarily it's even the tallest.
PIE
December 20th, 2006, 07:41 PM
Nice height... but not a very special design.
But it's a great addition for the skyline of Rotterdam!!
marcobruls
December 20th, 2006, 07:42 PM
Not that bad at all!:)
Great height for Rotterdam of course, temporarily it's even the tallest.
Blahblahblah
Nice mass :)
Nout
December 20th, 2006, 08:10 PM
A very nice residental tower, good for Rotterdam. I like the last picture in post # 5 -> The Rotterdam skyline is growing and growing...
Pruim
December 20th, 2006, 09:39 PM
temporarily it's even the tallest
Blahblahblah
If only you'd knew...
SkyView
December 20th, 2006, 09:39 PM
Good height for Rotterdam, nothing more.
wiki
December 20th, 2006, 09:48 PM
it looks ok
Wegcent
December 20th, 2006, 09:51 PM
Als ze hem bouwen is die plompe bebouwing bij de willemsbrug wel weer veel beter verteerbaar:
samen oogt het beter dan afzonderlijk
Eric Offereins
December 20th, 2006, 10:00 PM
Typical Dutch design, but the project is impressive. :)
Skyscrapercitizen
December 20th, 2006, 10:03 PM
Als ze hem bouwen is die plompe bebouwing bij de willemsbrug wel weer veel beter verteerbaar:
samen oogt het beter dan afzonderlijk
This forum is international, so please use english here... :cheers:
Kraftmeister
December 20th, 2006, 10:47 PM
I really like the red colour!
1+2=3
December 21st, 2006, 11:26 AM
This forum is international, so please use english here... :cheers:
Only Dutch people here so... ;)
Skyscrapercitizen
December 21st, 2006, 11:42 AM
^^
many people watch but don't post.
Killswitch
December 21st, 2006, 04:26 PM
^^
many people watch but don't post.
a lot of people don't care
171m is nothing special :lol:
Dr. Dubai
December 21st, 2006, 06:27 PM
Blahblahblah
What bla bla bla? Are u a sheep?
It's just a fact. I wouldn't surprise me if some taller plans will catch up in Roffa the comming years.
I guess you thought I wanted to get some attention for the Belle van Zuylen in Utrecht, 262 meter, but we're talking about Roffa here, u know what I'm saying?
Dr. Dubai
December 21st, 2006, 06:29 PM
a lot of people don't care
171m is nothing special :lol:
Sounds kinda disdainfull. If 171 meter is " also" nothing special for you, just don't tire yourself by posting here:)
marcobruls
December 21st, 2006, 07:16 PM
What bla bla bla? Are u a sheep?
It's just a fact. I wouldn't surprise me if some taller plans will catch up in Roffa the comming years.
I guess you thought I wanted to get some attention for the Belle van Zuylen in Utrecht, 262 meter, but we're talking about Roffa here, u know what I'm saying?
And yes ^^with you its not that weird thinking that .....troll
Bitch please.........dont get me started on you....
Great tower btw.
gothicform
December 21st, 2006, 07:41 PM
my thoughts on this design - its very boring and modern, very dutch too. that means to me it will be a quality build but restrained, the dutch seem to have a very conservative approach to their architecture with only the occasional piece of post modern design motif that suggests its dutch.
i suppose i like showy architecture which is why it doesnt rock my boat much. despite this it appears to be a good example of what it is. i do like the massing of the scheme in the context of where it is placed in the city, i think it works well there as a peak and certainly adds a spot of density. i always have mixed feelings on rotterdam, or any dutch city having real canary wharf style density because it doesnt feel dutch. still, rotterdam needs some pinnacles.
Pruim
December 21st, 2006, 07:55 PM
171m is nothing special :lol:
This is a residential tower and in the top 5 (or even top 3?) of tallest residential scrapers in Europe, so it is special :banana:
pimvdh
December 21st, 2006, 08:03 PM
This is a residential tower and in the top 5 (or even top 3?) of tallest residential scrapers in Europe, so it is special :banana:
and a skyscraper doessn't has to be tall to be special
Dr. Dubai
December 21st, 2006, 09:14 PM
and a skyscraper doessn't has to be tall to be special
That's true, but in that case it should compensate the height with magnificant architecture. Due to the lack of originality, this one won't be a nominee in a " most special skyscraper race" .
Nevertheless, it's a great tower. Places where you can live above 150 meter are still pretty uncommon in "Yurp";)
LAYZIEDOGG
December 21st, 2006, 10:49 PM
Congratulations Rotterdam ,I drove passed the city this afternoon and its getting denser and denser , 171 m is great but 200+ would be better and I think its time for a 200+ in Rotterdam .
Skyscrapercitizen
December 22nd, 2006, 01:21 PM
^^
It's time since long... ;)
Muse
December 22nd, 2006, 01:45 PM
a lot of people don't care
171m is nothing special :lol:...and a lot do care. If it turns out to be good architecture, fine.
Thanks Tim. Looks like a solid tower.
[Kees]
May 24th, 2007, 10:46 AM
http://www.foto010.nl/pix/685.jpg
The functional height is now set on 176 meters :)
Nathanaelll
May 24th, 2007, 11:43 AM
best photo Ive seen from this project!
James R. Hawkwood
May 24th, 2007, 01:25 PM
WoW!!! a 176 Meter highrise for us dutch people!! :D
And the design looks good too :D:D
Racingfreak
May 24th, 2007, 04:40 PM
I like the first impression, this will be a great tower, and the highest of the netherlands
SkyBridge
May 24th, 2007, 11:12 PM
Structural height 185m... Amazing tower :)
Sir P von
May 25th, 2007, 05:51 AM
these guys from dam architects are certainly enjoying their 15 years of fame right now :lol: their maastower is also a skyscraper that, for me, ranks right up there with the designs of some of the best architects in the world.
this building looks absolutely fantastic. great use of colour and apparant detail of the facade. it also blends in really well with the surroundings. hopefully the end product will look equally stunning as the render. in a couple of years rotterdam will look like a class city. hopefully the local government will also spend some money on polishing the city on the street level because right now, in some areas the place looks like a ghetto.
Sir P von
May 25th, 2007, 06:07 AM
Structural height 185m... Amazing tower :)
structural height as in puny spire, or structural height as in something big and useless so that it will actually look 185m?
Paulie Walnuts
May 25th, 2007, 04:12 PM
It should be Zalmhaeve If I'm correct.................
SkyBridge
May 25th, 2007, 04:51 PM
Actually, it's ZALMHAVEN URBAN so no AE and definitely no EA ;)
Eric Offereins
May 25th, 2007, 04:52 PM
Nice tower, but I am not sure if I like that yellow band at the top.
Racingfreak
May 25th, 2007, 05:50 PM
Nice tower, but I am not sure if I like that yellow band at the top.
The yellow band is rubbish
TouristMan
May 26th, 2007, 12:35 PM
wow!
Sir P von
May 27th, 2007, 12:34 AM
dudes, i'm like the only one that said something relevant in this thread (as opposed to the people who are fighting out their little indifferences) except for the heroes posting pictures. how come i'm being ignored? :nuts:
skytrax
May 27th, 2007, 01:17 AM
Rotterdam need some 200+
SkyBridge
May 27th, 2007, 03:30 AM
@ Sir von P
You aren't being ignored - your words are just so wise that no one can disagree ;)
Elio di Angelis
January 24th, 2008, 07:11 PM
Rotterdam rely needs that yeah
vBulletin® v3.8.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.