View Full Version : Disappearances from Cruise Liners


legslikeaspider
January 19th, 2007, 02:31 PM
Came across this thought provoking article in yesterday's Guardian newspaper. Its all a bit Agatha Christie isn't it?

http://travel.guardian.co.uk/article/2007/jan/18/cruises.g2.crime



In the last days of the Vietnam war, Hue Pham and his wife Hue Tran spent two perilous weeks on a cramped container ship, adrift with no food and little water in the South China Sea. The couple survived this desperate flight from Vietnam, built a new life in America, and then, three decades later, decided to take a Caribbean cruise on a ship called the Carnival Destiny. This was the boat journey that they would not survive.

The facts of the couple's disappearance, as the Destiny sailed between Barbados and Aruba on May 12 2005, are few. After a fruitless on-board search, the ship eventually retraced its path, joined by the US coastguard. No trace of their bodies was ever found.

For the relatives, the deaths left a terrible, insoluble puzzle. Their son, Son Michael Pham, maintained that his parents had no reason to take their own lives and were in fact planning a trip back to Vietnam, and were looking forward to meeting relatives again. "Two American citizens with no personal or financial problems, no serious health problems, living the happiest time of their lives, both vanished without a trace or witness," he later told an inquiry.

The cruise had been a Mother's Day gift to the couple, and they were on board ship with their daughter and granddaughter. "I immediately flew down to California, went through their home, and tried to find one clue, something unusual. I could not," Son Michael says now.

Since then, with the help of two other bereaved families, Son Michael has helped establish a group called the International Cruise Victims. In the past weeks, he has been offering his help to yet another family, after the QE2 sailed into Southampton on January 2 this year one passenger short.

Officially, Hampshire police are still investigating how a 62-year-old German woman, so far identified only as Sabine L, disappeared from a new-year cruise aboard the QE2 somewhere off Madeira. Her family has launched its own website appealing for help (www.qe2missing.de). But the full truth of Sabine L's last moments on the luxury Cunard liner is unlikely ever to be firmly established - beyond the cold fact that she joins more than 30 passengers who, in the past four years, have mysteriously disappeared from cruise ships worldwide.

Read the full article……

Last year the cruise industry reported that 24 passengers had disappeared between 2003 and last March. The information emerged after a US Congressional subcommittee found itself with an unlikely task: to examine the threat posed to citizens by booking a cruise holiday. Since then, at least 10 more passengers and two crew have been reported missing or overboard, including one Scottish pensioner lost in the Atlantic last November. These figures do not include known suicides and those who, for one or reason or another - a drunken argument, perhaps, or misplaced bravado - are known to have deliberately jumped. Of those who have gone mysteriously missing, some may have killed themselves; other incidents may be alcohol-related mishaps; but in at least one case, the death of a 52-year-old woman on the Island Escape in Italy, something more sinister may have gone on. The FBI is still investigating that case.

After hearing details of those who had gone missing on board ships, subcommittee chairman, Christopher Shays, a Republican congressman, warned of a "growing manifest of unexplained disappearances, unsolved crimes and brazen acts of lawlessness on the high seas". Like small cities, he said, cruise ships experienced crimes. "But city dwellers know the risks of urban life - and no one falls off a city never to be heard of again." Going on a cruise was, he said, perhaps "the perfect way to commit the perfect crime".

There was no evidence of foul play in the disappearance of "M", a 40-year-old woman, from Celebrity Cruise Line's Mercury. But then, there was precious little evidence at all - and what did emerge was largely due to the persistence of her father, Kendall Carver, a former company CEO, who spent tens of thousands of dollars on legal fees and private investigators in an attempt to discover the truth about her disappearance. (Carver has asked the Guardian not to use his daughter's name, to protect the privacy of other family members.) Carver says it was on the second day of the Mercury's cruise to Alaska in August 2004 that a cabin steward realised that M's room had not been slept in and reported her absence to his boss, who told him he would deal with it. Throughout the cruise, the steward continued to place chocolates on the pillow of the unused bed, as he was ordered to do, but no one saw M again. At the end of the cruise, when the ship docked in Vancouver and all passengers disembarked, M's belongings were packed away. No one notified the police or her family. It was only after her father filed a missing person's report that police discovered that she had disappeared from a cruise ship.

Kendall Carver's loss was, he says, made worse by a lack of cooperation from the cruise line. At one point, Celebrity Cruise Line issued a statement in which it called the death a horrible tragedy, and added that "regrettably, there is very little a cruise line, a resort or a hotel can do to prevent someone from committing suicide". As Carver points out, the case is still open and his daughter has not been declared dead by the family or the FBI - in his belief, suicide is neither the only nor the most likely explanation.

Celebrity Cruise Line, however, now says: "There is probably nothing we or any company could do that would make the parents feel the company had acted sensitively enough." Today, all the company's passengers pass a computerised checkout at the end of a cruise.

Whatever the truth of what happened, M's case starkly underlines a fact that cruise passengers, potentially thousands of miles from home, should be well aware of: out at sea, there are no police.

It is extremely difficult for any detective to piece together a murder case without a body, and chances of finding a passenger dumped into the ocean are slim indeed. And while all cruise ships employ security officers, they do not always seal off crime scenes, detain suspects and interview witnesses in the manner that might be expected of them.

Two cases in particular have gripped the US and Australia respectively: the disappearance of honeymooner George Smith [see below] and the death of mother of three Dianne Brimble. The story of Smith, presumed to have gone overboard from the superliner Brilliance of the Seas less than 10 days into his married life, was lapped up by US television networks. First there was the young, well-connected victim and his telegenic, grieving widow opening up on talkshows; then family rifts and media-friendly forensic investigators added to the drama. The details of Brimble's end, left drugged and naked to die on P&O Australia's Pacific Sky, emerged in the more low-key surroundings of a New South Wales coroner's court. But both cases have been marked by questions over how well initial investigations were handled, by angry allegations from families and rebuttals from cruise lines, and an increased public perception that something was seriously amiss.

Unlike many in the grim litany of victims' tales, Dianne Brimble did not disappear. Brimble, 42, from Brisbane, had saved for two years to go on a cruise with her sister and their daughters. But by the end of the first night of her holiday in September 2002, she was lying naked, drugged and dying on the floor of a cabin, ignored and ridiculed by the men who had left her there.

A toxicology report would later show that Brimble had died of an overdose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, a party drug also known as fantasy, GHB, GBH or liquid ecstasy, and often described as a date-rape drug. Brimble, her family told Australian TV, didn't even like to take Panadol.

By the time police met the boat in the South Pacific island of Noumea to investigate, the male passengers had been back in to the cabin to tidy up. No one has been charged in relation to her death, and it took more than three years for the details of her story to emerge at the coroner's inquest, which reopens next month in Australia.

Eight men were identified as "persons of interest" in the investigation. Photographs retrieved from a digital camera would reveal that before her death at least one man had sex with Brimble; photographs were taken even when she was passed out naked on the floor.

The Brimble inquest highlighted a cruise culture far from old-fashioned ideas of shuffle-board, after-dinner dances and G&Ts at the captain's table. At one point an advert for P&O cruises was produced in court: a postcard showing a line of sunbathing women and bearing the slogan, "Seamen wanted". P&O's lawyers protested that the cruise line was not on trial. But the coroner ruled it was admiss- ible evidence; Brimble, she said, did not die in a vacuum.

If the behaviour of eight "persons of interest" had attracted complaints - a photo of one showed him running naked through the ship on the night of Brimble's death - ship security officers would reveal that finding drunk, naked people on deck was a relatively common occurrence.

It is just not deaths and disappearances that are a problem on cruise ships. According to crime statistics supplied to the Congressional hearings by 15 of the biggest lines, covering around 85% of cruise holidays worldwide, there were 178 reports of sexual assault on cruise ships between 2003 and 2005. FBI representatives testified to their belief that the figures were under-reported - and further documents recently obtained under court order by a Miami lawyer, James Walker, show that Royal Caribbean alone, which carries around 25% of cruise passengers, recorded more than 100 complaints of sexual assault and sexual battery within that time span.

Some British and American security officers claim that the real picture is even worse. Geoff Furlong, an ex-detective from Liverpool who worked for six years as a security officer for two cruise lines, says: "It doesn't matter what the class of ship is. Young women are particularly susceptible - particularly from crew members. They hunt in packs."

He claims often to have discovered crew targeting young female passengers. "Say I came across the situation: the guy would be up before the captain at the next port of call and thrown off the ship at his own expense, to repatriate him to Costa Rica, or wherever," he says. "That was all that happened - there was never any police involvement." If passengers complained, they were bought off, he says, "given champagne, free holidays, told about the consequences of going to court, how it would bring shame on their families". Such complaints, he says, would frequently not even be logged.

"The cruise companies just want it to go away," says Randy Jaques, an American security officer. He claims personally to have dealt with more than 50 complaints, and says hundreds of women have signed "Jane Doe agreements" - meaning they have reached an out-of-court settlement with the cruise lines and signed a confidentiality clause.

Passengers can find themselves in a complex legal situation, potentially under numerous jurisdictions when sailing abroad. With many cruise ships registered under flags of convenience with relatively slack tax and labour regimes, the relevant laws might be those of Panama, the Bahamas or Bermuda. Prosecuting, say, a sacked crew member who has returned to his own country brings a whole new dimension of complexity. Charles Lipcon, a Miami lawyer who has built a 30-year career on suing cruise lines, says his firm does not normally take on cases without a clear jurisdiction. "What I've seen over the years is that it's a hot potato for everyone, and nothing much gets done," he says.

In the US, Son Michael Pham's victim-support organisation has persuaded two members of congress to sponsor a bill, the Cruise Line Accurate Safety Statistics Act, to put more of an onus on cruise lines to prevent and report crimes at sea. James Walker believes that many are unreported, and points out that crew members are far more at risk than passengers. "You don't have young Filipino women who have been sexually abused calling in to the guest claims department," he says. In fact, convictions of either employees or passengers are virtually unheard of. "People call and say they are confident that the FBI can solve their crime," he says. "We say, 'Well, if it happens with this cruise line, it will be the first time in their history.'"

Cruise lines, meanwhile, have been at pains to stress that ships are inherently safe, self- contained environments. In the context of millions of passengers each year, the number of missing people and reported sexual assaults compares well with statistics on land, they say; crimes such as robbery are negligible.

William Giddons, director of the UK's Passenger Shipping Association, representing the cruise industry, says: "The occurrence is so rare, anything that happens on a cruise ship is news. Because we're such a high-profile industry, it's something we have to live with. Compare us with a resort or a hotel, where there is virtually no security at all.

"I can't sit here and tell you that all crimes are reported - but the rules are very strict that they should be. They certainly will be now, if [they weren't] in the past."

Changes are indeed being made. Drug- and terror-related concerns have seen airport-style security introduced at ports, complete with x-ray machines and sniffer dogs. The on-board culture on "fun ships" may be changing, too: in Australia, a beleaguered P&O has increased CCTV, stopped 24-hour drinking, and scrapped its notorious "schoolies cruises", which often saw unruly passengers expelled on South Pacific islands. Its ill-fated ship, the Pacific Sky - now linked to four premature passenger deaths through accidents and illness in as many years - has been sold off.

The industry still has some PR work to do, though: disappearances and assaults aside, it has been beset by a roll-call of blights in recent years. Last year one man died when fire swept through cabins on a Caribbean cruise, and passengers feared for their lives as another cruise ship blazed in the English Channel. Cunard's Queen Mary 2 was recently the scene of a very public passenger mutiny after propeller troubles cut every stop from the cruise itinerary. Other cruises have been hit by the norovirus: a highly contagious sickness with symptoms including diarrhoea, stomach cramps and violent projectile vomiting. Some older British people had to be stretchered off one ship when it returned to Hull, and at one point successive outbreaks of the virus confined the world's newest, biggest megaliner, the Freedom of the Seas, to port. In late 2005, the luxurious Seabourn Spirit even found itself having to face down pirates with rocket launchers.

The industry has also run into problems on environmental grounds. In Alaska, where only ships with advanced waste purification systems are allowed to sail, a referendum has led to the tightening of controls and a rise in taxes on cruise ships. Meanwhile, Californian ports, under the newly green leadership of Arnold Schwarzenegger, are forcing ships to reduce their fuel smoke emissions. More large fines have been levied on cruise ships for dumping untreated waste.

But despite it all, passengers continue to flock to the ships. The Passenger Shipping Association estimates that there was a 17% rise in Britons taking cruises last year - with 1.25m of us taking a trip - and predicts that 1.55m will be on board by 2008. Worldwide, the figure is expected to pass 15m people going on a cruise annually. Bigger ships with astonishing facilities are intermittently unveiled - and monster ships to dwarf today's megaliners are under construction. With these huge ships boasting theatres and shopping malls larger than those found in many towns, passengers need hardly know they are at sea at all. So long, of course, as they don't go overboard

Profile: George Smith, a young man who went missing on honeymoon

Young, handsome and wealthy, George Allen Smith IV, a 26-year-old from Connecticut, went missing on a honeymoon cruise in the Mediterranean with his new wife, Jennifer Hagel Smith.

After a lavish wedding in Rhode Island, the couple had fl own to Europe, and in Barcelona boarded Royal Caribbean's Brilliance of the Seas, a large resort ship that caters for the younger and more active end of the market.

On the seventh day of the cruise, July 5 2005, Smith was reported missing. The newlyweds had spent the previous evening in the bar and casino with acquaintances from the cruise, drinking heavily. Hagel Smith said she remembered nothing after leaving the bar, allegedly after rowing with her husband. At around 3.30am, Smith, intoxicated, was helped back to his cabin. His wife was not there.

The next morning, a passenger noticed a large bloodstain on a canopy below the Smiths' cabin, and called security. Jennifer was tracked down to the ship's spa, where she was having a massage. George was missing without a trace.

Turkish forensic investigators were called in, as was an FBI agent holidaying in the area. By evening, the bloodstain was cleaned away and the ship continued on its voyage. If anyone had been responsible for Smith's death, that person was on the cruise: in the words of the dead man's sister, Bree Smith, who is convinced that there was foul play, "the Brilliance of the Seas sailed off into the sunset with the murderers on board".

In June 2006, Smith's family filed a lawsuit against the cruise line. Hours later, Royal Caribbean announced that the widow, Jennifer Hagel Smith, separately from the family, had agreed to a settlement.

Hagel Smith told the press: "As many great peace and spiritual teachers have said, through great suffering comes great awareness." Details of the settlement were revealed last week: Hagel Smith received a payment worth one million dollars.

Profile: Annette Mizener, a mother who disappeared on a cruise she won as a prize

Annette Mizener, 37, from Wisconsin, was reported missing on the last night of a nine-day cruise to the Mexican Riviera on the Carnival Pride.

Both her parents and daughter were accompanying her on the cruise, which she had won as a prize in a competition. On the evening of her disappearance on December 4 2004, Mizener performed Britney Spears' Baby One More Time at a karaoke night with her daughter, then went to the casino. Later than evening she was due to meet her parents again for bingo. But she never made it.

Her parents, Wally and Heidi Knerler, were immediately concerned. When an announcement came over the Tannoy that her purse had been found, they rushed to find cruise staff . The damaged purse had been discovered near a railing on the lower deck.

The local coastguard led a fruitless search of more than 800km2 of water well into the next day. The FBI later investigated, but no explanation was ever forthcoming. A CCTV camera nearby had been obscured - covered up by a map of the ship.

Finally a judge declared Mizener offi cially dead, but the family - who rule out suicide and suspect foul play - still have no answers. Carnival have since agreed an out-of-court, confidential settlement with Mizener's husband, John.

· Gwyn Topham is the author of the book Overboard: The Stories Cruise Lines Don't Want Told, published by Random House Australia

hkskyline
January 20th, 2007, 12:10 PM
Suit in Cruise Disappearance Dismissed
Wednesday January 17, 6:04 pm ET
By John Christoffersen, Associated Press Writer

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) -- A Miami judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. by the family of a Greenwich man who disappeared from his honeymoon cruise, the cruise company said Wednesday.
The family of George Allen Smith IV of Greenwich filed the lawsuit after he disappeared from the Brilliance of the Seas while on a cruise in the Aegean Sea on July 5, 2005. His body was not recovered, though bloodstains were found on an awning underneath the newlywed's cabin balcony.

The FBI is still investigating.

The lawsuit dismissed Wednesday was an amended version of a lawsuit that had been dismissed in November.

The latest action by Judge Jon Gordon was with prejudice, which means the lawsuit cannot be refiled, according to Royal Caribbean. The decision can be appealed.

"For some time, we have said that a fair, accurate and objective review of the facts would clearly demonstrate that both their first and amended lawsuits were completely baseless," Royal Caribbean said in a statement. "We believe the court's decision to dismiss both of the Smiths' lawsuits -- most recently with prejudice -- upholds the validity of our position."

Brett Rivkind, attorney for Smith's family, vowed to appeal.

"We think the decision is not well-reasoned," Rivkind said. "We're confident an appeal court will conclude that the conduct that has been alleged is sufficient to rise to a level of outrageous conduct. A jury should decide."

Smith's disappearance became one of the most publicized cases of a missing passenger aboard a cruise ship, sparking congressional hearings on maritime security and a federal bill requiring cruise lines to report cases of missing passengers and crimes to the Department of Homeland Security.

Smith's parents and sister alleged in their lawsuit that the cruise company tried to cover up the incident to avoid liability and negative publicity.

Royal Caribbean representatives have said the cruise line exceeded its legal requirements when it contacted the FBI and other authorities immediately after learning about Smith's disappearance.

Royal Caribbean agreed this month to pay more than $1 million to Smith's estate. His widow accepted the deal, but his parents and sister dismissed it as a "sellout."

hkskyline
July 17th, 2009, 10:01 PM
CRUISING INTO TROUBLE
Twelve people have fallen off cruise ships or ferries this year. Accidents? Suicides? We may never know.
17 June 2009
St. Petersburg Times

It's not easy to fall off a cruise ship, and it doesn't happen often, but when it does twice in 24 hours in the Gulf of Mexico, it prompts conversation around another body of water, this one found directly behind Bill in accounting.

Hear about the guy who fell off the cruise ship? we say.

Must've been drunk, we say.

Must've been doing that scene from Titanic.

But it's rare that we assign any kind of context to these - what are they? Falls? Accidents? Jumps? Worse?

Perhaps that's what captures our interest about at-sea plunges. When no one is around to witness a passenger descend from a floating city and disappear into the darkness, we're left to our assumptions.

So far this year, 12 passengers or crewmen have gone overboard from cruise ships or ferries. That includes the Alabama woman still missing after a Tuesday morning fall 75 miles southwest of Pensacola, and the man found Monday morning clinging to a buoy near Fort De Soto, and an 18-year-old from Louisiana who fell overboard in late May about 150 miles southwest of Tampa.

That's according to Ross Klein, a professor at Memorial University of Newfoundland and one of the only keepers of such data. Because there is no central government agency that tracks disappearances or deaths or falls from cruise ships, Klein relies on media reports from around the world to keep tabs on an industry intent on spreading a completely different idea.

"They're trying to sell a vacation product and this isn't good news," Klein says. "They tout cruising as the safest mode of transportation anywhere in the world. People go on them expecting to be safe, and these incidents contradict that perception."

Since 2000, the highest number of incidents reported came in 2006, when 22 people went overboard. But 12 million people cruised that year. That means roughly one of every 545,454 people who cruisedin 2006 wound up in the drink. Not an astonishing safety hazard.

But if you consider that one of those reports was about a family with four children who returned from vacation with only three . . .

Or that one was about a man who returned from a Christmas cruise without his wife . . .

How do you fall off a cruise ship?

"It is virtually impossible for a guest to simply fall off a cruise ship," says Carnival Cruise Lines spokesman Vance Gulliksen in an e-mail.

"I always say I wish the English language had better words for people who go beyond safety barriers intentionally and lose their grip," says Paul Motter, editor of CruiseMates.com, an online guide to cruising. "I have no better word for it. Generally we say they are 'gone overboard under unknown circumstances.' "

Practically, falling overboard is a challenge. It would involve climbing or jumping or the right kind of momentum.

Carnival Cruise Lines' ships have 44-inch high railings and warning signs, says Gulliksen. They have uniformed security patrolling 24 hours a day.

Even cruise critics agree it's not easy. "Nine times out of 10, the person did something dumb," said Charles Lipcon, a Miami attorney and author of Unsafe on the High Seas: Your Guide to a Safer Cruise.

Lipcon has litigated a few where people have fallen overboard, including one in which a woman went missing and her purse was found on the deck and a security camera had been covered.

"They're very difficult cases," he said. "You need to prove that the cruise lines have violated some duty. And normally they don't. You can't keep people from doing dumb things. The ships aren't made out of rubber."

There are trends in these incidents.

Some are suicides. Couples fight, and then one jumps in an I'll-show-you kind of way. Some elderly couples have decided to leave the world together, a last hurrah on the high seas.

Alcohol is fuel. Critics say alcohol sales are a big moneymaker for cruise lines, so they have a tendency to overserve.

"It's drink and drink and drink," says Charles Harris, former chief of security for Carnival who has become an outspoken critic of cruise industry secrecy. "We'll take your money, and if you fall overboard, we don't worry about it." (Carnival's Gulliksen says employees are trained to refuse service to intoxicated guests.)

Then there are the mysteries.

No notes. No suicidal tendencies. No heavy intoxication.

They fall or jump or stumble or are pushed, and no one is there to see, and the Coast Guard searches and the news breaks and we try to solve the puzzle on steadier shores.