TampaMike
February 5th, 2007, 04:02 AM
Continued from the old thread.
Last thread: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=359009
Last thread: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=359009
|
View Full Version : Tampa: Channelside Development (Part 2) TampaMike February 5th, 2007, 04:02 AM Continued from the old thread. Last thread: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=359009 TampaMike February 5th, 2007, 04:09 AM Teleconference Center-Two 38 Story Towers.Fairmount Hotel/Condo Tower. Approval in March Del Villar- 33 Story Residential Tower. Proposed, Approval in March Place Tower- 32 stories, approved, 350 feet, 300 units, complete early ‘08 Newks- 40 stories, approved, 250 units Towers @ Channelside- 2 x30 stories, U/C, 257 units, complete mid ‘07 Blu Channelside- 2 x30 stories, proposed, 250 units, complete mid ‘08 O2- ~25 stories, proposed, redesigning Novare Channelsdie- 25 stories, proposed, delayed but still alive Finergy- 11 and 23 stories, 212 condos and 110 hotel rooms, proposed Martin- 22 stories, approved, 321 units, groundbreaking late ’06, completion late ‘08 Plaza @ Harbor Island- 3 x 20 stories, U/C, 138 units (first tower) 102 Whiting St. Tower- 20 stories, 200 feet, proposed, 190 units Grand Central- 14, 12 stories, U/C, 392 units, complete mid ‘07 Ventana- 2x11 stories, U/C, complete late ’06, 84 units Seaboard Square- 18, 16, 2 x4 stories, proposed Seaport Channelside- 8 stories, U/C, 422 units, complete late ‘07 Place Condos- 8 stories, U/C, 165 units, complete late ‘06 Slade- 8 stories, approved, 280 units, complete late ’07, sales underway Meridian- 6 stories, Completed 1000 Channelside- 4 stories, U/C, 15 units, Completed History Museum- 5 stories, approved FloridaFuture February 5th, 2007, 01:04 PM Good list but you forgot: Navio- 22 stories, approved, 160 units And I think Seaport is 5 stories not 8. Jasonhouse February 5th, 2007, 09:18 PM Continued from the old thread. Why was this created? I appreciate the thoughtfulness, but the Channelside thread is nowhere near needing replaced. More importantly, only moderation staff should be doing any kind of thread maintenance, since only they have the editing capabilities needed to do it correctly... When a regular member does this, you are not helping. You are only creating 2x more work for the staff. |