View Full Version : Hunt Valley firm to construct $30M 'green' headquarters


Silver Springer
February 9th, 2007, 08:04 PM
Hunt Valley firm to construct $30M 'green' headquarters

Baltimore Business Journal - 11:49 AM EST Friday, February 9, 2007by Ryan SharrowStaff
Print this Article Email this Article Reprints RSS Feeds Most Viewed Most Emailed

KCI Technologies will be the latest Baltimore County company to go "green."

The Hunt Valley-based engineering firm will construct a 120,000 square foot "green building" at the Highlands Corporate Office Park in nearby Sparks where it will house its headquarters.


The project will cost KCI around $30 million, and should be completed by fall 2008, said company spokesman Chris Carbone in an e-mail.

Carbone said KCI has not gone far enough in the design process to determine which green components the building will boast.

KCI hopes to achieve the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design's (LEED) silver rating, Carbone said. The rating requires between 33 and 38 points, out of a possible 69. Points can be earned for preserving the developed site, conserving energy during construction, minimizing post-construction vacancy, and using manufacturing soils instead of importing farmland soils.

LEED-certified projects cost less to maintain, and are both energy- and water-efficient, according to the U.S. Green Building Council.

KCI says it needs more space in anticipation of a growth spurt over the next several years.

The four-story building will be constructed by Cignal Corp. of Timonium. KCI was represented by MacKenzie Commercial Real Estate Services in the transaction.

In August, Northwest Honda in Owings Mills was the first Baltimore County business to feature a "green roof."

The car dealership opened a 40,000-square-foot facility on Reisterstown Road boasting more than 100,000 plants on a environmentally beneficial roof.

The project cost Northwest $12 million.

PeterSmith
February 12th, 2007, 04:32 AM
This is good news. I'm all for more LEED-certified buildings, I just wish they could make them a little more attractive. Sometimes they aren't the best eye candy. Are there renderings for this one yet? I would like to see the region become a lot more socially/environmentally conscious, especially in our downtowns. The East Coast has always lagged behind the West Coast in this regard, and I think it might be a good move for Baltimore and Washington to take the lead in this area. It would be a bold move for us to be on the cutting edge of something for once.

Maudibjr
February 13th, 2007, 07:24 AM
This is good news. I'm all for more LEED-certified buildings, I just wish they could make them a little more attractive. Sometimes they aren't the best eye candy. Are there renderings for this one yet? I would like to see the region become a lot more socially/environmentally conscious, especially in our downtowns. The East Coast has always lagged behind the West Coast in this regard, and I think it might be a good move for Baltimore and Washington to take the lead in this area. It would be a bold move for us to be on the cutting edge of something for once.

Here is a thought, while this building will be green, they are building it way out in Sparks, which is the very outer limit that development is allowed in N. Baltimore County. Is it 'more green' to have the building green or in a central location that employees won't have to drive as far to get to? (I realize that there headquarters is already there,but thats beside the point)

getontrac
February 13th, 2007, 04:29 PM
^Yeah, I mean if they are building on a greenfield site, why should we give them credit?

About 10 years ago the state of Pennsylvania built a "green" building for one of their Dept of Enviro Resources offices. IIRC, it was a greenfield location. Not pedestrian friendly. The buildings footprint was small compared to the site and had it's own parking lot (which drained into swale in the front yard).

I was still a teenager at the time, but insulted and assualted nonetheless:

If they are trying to be green, why don't they put the parking in the building?

Better yet, why didn't they just built the damn thing in downtown Harrisburg on an empty parking lot? Now THAT woulda been GREEN! (and helpful to downtown Harrisburg!)

Nate

PeterSmith
February 13th, 2007, 10:39 PM
Here is a thought, while this building will be green, they are building it way out in Sparks, which is the very outer limit that development is allowed in N. Baltimore County. Is it 'more green' to have the building green or in a central location that employees won't have to drive as far to get to? (I realize that there headquarters is already there,but thats beside the point)

I had the same thought, but I still support the idea. Maryland currently only has one LEED certified building in the entire state - The Philip Merrill Environmental Center in Annapolis. Environmentally-safe buildings aren't going to pop up in the CBD overnight. The technology needs to be tested, and people need to become accustomed to the idea. It's also a fairly expensive endeavor. It would be great if more people moved into the city and we built only environmentally-conscious buildings, but it'll take time, and this is the first step in that direction.

Maudibjr
February 16th, 2007, 07:07 PM
^Yeah, I mean if they are building on a greenfield site, why should we give them credit?

About 10 years ago the state of Pennsylvania built a "green" building for one of their Dept of Enviro Resources offices. IIRC, it was a greenfield location. Not pedestrian friendly. The buildings footprint was small compared to the site and had it's own parking lot (which drained into swale in the front yard).

I was still a teenager at the time, but insulted and assualted nonetheless:

If they are trying to be green, why don't they put the parking in the building?

Better yet, why didn't they just built the damn thing in downtown Harrisburg on an empty parking lot? Now THAT woulda been GREEN! (and helpful to downtown Harrisburg!)

Nate

I agree with you. Frankly one of the biggest things a building can do to be 'green' is to reuse a space. Not neccesiarily a building itself but its lot. That wa existing parking and roads and utilities can be reused. Then make the new building 'green'.

I also agree with you PeterSmith that new technoliges need to be tested. But again why in a new lot?

SWM
February 16th, 2007, 10:47 PM
Century Engineering in Cockeysville reached pretty high with their LEED headquaters. You can see it to the east of 83. Doesn't look bad, but wasn't THAT green moving from Towson (near B-more county offices) to Cockeysville.

http://www.hcm2.com/firm/News.aspx?Index=20