View Full Version : Maryland Jobs Brought by BRAC


Silver Springer
February 9th, 2007, 09:15 PM
Base Plan Would Add 45,000 Jobs, Md. Predicts
Anne Arundel, Harford Would Gain Most Spots In Military Realignment

By Raymond McCaffrey
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 9, 2007; Page B01

Maryland would gain more than 45,000 federal and private-sector jobs as part of a Pentagon reorganization of military bases that will add workers to installations such as Fort Meade and Aberdeen Proving Ground, according to a report to be released today.

The study by the Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development determined that Harford County, the location of Aberdeen Proving Ground, would gain 12,712 jobs, and Anne Arundel County, home to Fort Meade, would get 10,049 positions.

An additional 4,236 jobs would come to Montgomery, 3,463 to Prince George's and 2,259 to Howard counties, and thousands more to the Baltimore region.

"This is the single largest job growth in Maryland since World War II," said Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown (D), who is coordinating the state's response to the federal Base Realignment and Closure Commission plan, known as BRAC.

"I'm enthusiastic about the challenges that we have in front of us," he said.

The study, funded by the U.S. Department of Labor, comes as federal, state and county officials struggle with how to accommodate the additional workers generated as the military consolidates jobs. The report cites projections that BRAC would create a demand for more than 25,000 homes in eight Maryland counties, which local officials say would increase the burden on crowded schools and roads.

Important to the planning process, officials say, will be lining up road-building and school construction projects to correspond with the arrival of new workers.

BRAC will involve a redeployment of workers from military installations closer to Washington. Fort Belvoir in southern Fairfax County also stands to add tens of thousands of jobs, with defense contractors and related businesses following the military workforce.

Technically, the BRAC shifts would move 5,400 jobs to Fort Meade and 2,176 jobs to Aberdeen. But those figures are expected to grow quickly as contractors relocate their offices.

The overwhelming majority of new homes in Maryland would come with the personnel shifts at those two bases, with 1.9 percent of the new households coming from job growth at Andrews Air Force Base in Prince George's, according to the state Planning Department. The effect of growth at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda was neutralized by a corresponding shift of positions there from Walter Reed Army Medical Center, about six miles away.

"The report is beginning to give us a baseline of what to expect in terms of the influx of jobs, the influx of households and the demands that that will place on the infrastructure, whether that be transportation, schools, workforce," Brown said.

Brown said state officials hope to develop an "action-oriented strategic plan" to deal with BRAC by mid-fall. Meanwhile, county executives representing affected areas are working to create a priority list to try to get key funding for projects. The first phase of the transfer of workers is set to begin by 2009.

We're all going to provide a blueprint upon which we all can agree -- that's the goal," said Anne Arundel County Executive John R. Leopold (R). "I think the best chance of success is to offer a regional approach with a regional set of priorities."

All said the biggest challenge will be finding money for BRAC-related projects, particularly with indications that federal support might be drying up. "All roads lead to the money bin, and that's what we're looking for," Leopold

Legislators are discussing ways to streamline school construction in areas affected by BRAC, and transportation planners are exploring projects that include extending Metro's Green Line north from Greenbelt and the widening or improving of major arteries such as the Baltimore-Washington Parkway and routes 198 and 175, near Fort Meade.

Widening the parkway from Interstate 695 to Interstate 95 will start this spring, said David Buck, a spokesman for the State Highway Administration. Leopold is pressing the state to accelerate the widening of Route 175.

"All these jobs, all this growth, will probably be here in the next five years," Leopold said.

"We understand well the urgency of trying to get things moving now."

Counties such as Anne Arundel and Howard have assigned administrators to oversee their response to BRAC, and Annapolis, which plays an important role in providing area bus service, anticipates appointing someone to oversee the effect of the expansion around Fort Meade.

"We are a major transportation provider," Annapolis Mayor Ellen O. Moyer (D) said. "We need to be engaged in the issues relative to BRAC."

The state development department report also details the demands on Maryland's higher-education system in helping to provide training for what is expected to be a highly educated workforce.

Brown said the state will need to forge a partnership with businesses to develop training programs for the workforce, particularly with new jobs indirectly related to the base expansion.

"I imagine a large percentage of those indirect jobs will be filled by Marylanders," Brown said. "That's why we talk about jobs coming to Maryland and not necessarily people."

Silver Springer
February 9th, 2007, 09:21 PM
Maryland Jobs Brought by BRAC
Friday, February 9, 2007; Page B03

Number of federal and private-sector jobs generated by Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process, by jurisdiction:

Total: 45,232

Anne Arundel: 10,049

Baltimore: 3,145

Baltimore County: 3,898

Cecil: 2,602

Harford: 12,712

Howard: 2,259

Montgomery: 4,236

Prince George's: 3,463

Rest of Maryland: 2,868

SOURCE: Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development

BalWash
February 9th, 2007, 09:49 PM
Great. This line is very interesting/encouraging:
transportation planners are exploring projects that include extending Metro's Green Line north from Greenbelt [/B]and the widening or improving of major arteries such as the Baltimore-Washington Parkway and routes 198 and 175, near Fort Meade.

clb07
February 16th, 2007, 03:16 PM
New jobs are great but I want to hear more about road improvements.

Especially any plans on lane widening on the Pike, Old Georgetown Rd. and Georgia Ave.

BalWash
February 16th, 2007, 09:33 PM
New jobs are great but I want to hear more about road improvements.

Especially any plans on lane widening on the Pike, Old Georgetown Rd. and Georgia Ave.

We do not need to widen the Pike any more. If drivers are fed up with traffic on that road they can take the Red Line.

clb07
February 17th, 2007, 02:28 AM
If drivers are fed up with traffic on that road they can take the Red Line.

I would agree but there just seems to be a huge number of drivers in the area who simply will not take Metro when they can drive.

I don't know if it is being uncomfortable around strangers or needing to have private cell conversations in their cars but they will remain on our roads as packed as they may be.

(And Metro's declining quality of service is not much help either).

Silver Springer
February 17th, 2007, 02:52 AM
I would agree but there just seems to be a huge number of drivers in the area who simply will not take Metro when they can drive.

I don't know if it is being uncomfortable around strangers or needing to have private cell conversations in their cars but they will remain on our roads as packed as they may be.

(And Metro's declining quality of service is not much help either).

Widening roads isn't the solution, I can say that Georgia and the Pike do not need to be widened. You need to refer back to your first comment. It's all about the jobs (that and weening people off the auto). People wouldn't have to drive or take metro anyhwhere if we emphasized jobs over housing in Montgomery County but our government and some residents aren't so bright or perhaps they enjoy commuting in secret.

You can say "but jobs doesn't guarantee where people will live". Study after study has proven that jobs play the greatest role and have the biggest impact in where people locate. In the long-run people will live closer to where they work, not only that but other benefits as well.

BalWash
February 17th, 2007, 06:39 AM
I would agree but there just seems to be a huge number of drivers in the area who simply will not take Metro when they can drive.

I don't know if it is being uncomfortable around strangers or needing to have private cell conversations in their cars but they will remain on our roads as packed as they may be.

(And Metro's declining quality of service is not much help either).
I'm not giving my tax money to subsidize the lifestyle choice of people who just don't feel like taking metro. When the pain of driving in traffic becomes so great that these people will give up their "personal 2 ton hunk of metal" and accept rail like the rest of the world, America will become a better place. We will stop wasting our money on maintaining roads and stop funding terrorism by sending our money to the Arab countries.

harlem87
February 17th, 2007, 08:09 AM
We do not need to widen the Pike any more. If drivers are fed up with traffic on that road they can take the Red Line.

Dude you are really showing your true colors of being anti-growth by opposing highway projects.

Indepenence Boulevard(US 58) in Virginia Beach is 8 lanes and don't have half the amount of traffic as Rockville Pike and Red Line is right next to it.

harlem87
February 17th, 2007, 08:15 AM
I'm not giving my tax money to subsidize the lifestyle choice of people who just don't feel like taking metro. When the pain of driving in traffic becomes so great that these people will give up their "personal 2 ton hunk of metal" and accept rail like the rest of the world, America will become a better place. We will stop wasting our money on maintaining roads and stop funding terrorism by sending our money to the Arab countries.

In your littlwe world thats the right thing to do. In the real world YOU CAN NOT MAKE EVERYONE RIDE MASS TRANSIT!!!!!!! It does not help that the government Continues to Increase the Transit rate.

Again I say, until they stop building highways in Virginia, The Carolinas, Georgia, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Massachusettes, etc. then your words can be taken seriously in regards to the reduction of maintaining roads and wasting more money on useless Mass Transit.

21230
February 17th, 2007, 06:04 PM
In your littlwe world thats the right thing to do. In the real world YOU CAN NOT MAKE EVERYONE RIDE MASS TRANSIT!!!!!!! It does not help that the government Continues to Increase the Transit rate.

Again I say, until they stop building highways in Virginia, The Carolinas, Georgia, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Massachusettes, etc. then your words can be taken seriously in regards to the reduction of maintaining roads and wasting more money on useless Mass Transit.

Your emphasis on highways is a bit short-sighted. Many of the cities you mentioned above place heavy emphasis on public transport. New Jersey has a comprehensive network of trains and commuter rails (PATH Train and NJ Transit). The expansion of the area would never have occurred without reliance on transport via rail.

I encourage you to look at the numbers for rail commuters for the New York metropolitan area. There are trains running 24 hours a day from far upstate, to the tip of Long Island, to the south of New Jersey. There's also a comprehensive highway system, which is always clogged with traffic. If it weren't for the rail system, the exponential growth of the metropolitan area would have never occurred.

You can, in fact, take commuter rail into downtown Philadelphia by connecting the NJ Transit with Septa in Trenton, which is another example of a commuter rail that promotes growth.

In Boston, the Big Dig is a result of one of the worst highway systems in the country. The central artery and Mass Turnpike are still highly congested. It it weren't for a wonderul subway system and commuter rail (which extends into Rhode Island, past Worcester and into New Hampshire), Boston's downtown would never be what it is.

Even in DC, neighborhoods and suburban towns around the Metro have expoded in population.

The public transport in all of the above mentioned places are used by all workers, be it white collar or blue collar.

Sure, places like Houston, Orlando and the Carolinas can enjoy rapid expansion by the building of highways. Their population densities are meager as compared to the Northeast and they have infinite space for sprawl before they pale in comarison to how many people per square mile live anywhere between Boston and Washington DC.

Therefore, building rail would hardly be anti-growth. I'm very pro-growth and know from experience how much a good rail system can create efficiency and spark Business/Economic/Revenue growth. In areas where highways are congested, it is certainly necessary to improve the situation by improving the roads. It is of equal or greater importance to emphasize other options so the area can sustain the level of growth it's capable of.

getontrac
February 17th, 2007, 06:10 PM
A study done by or for New York area transit (I've read too many reports/studies et al) concluded essentially that:

One track of heavy rail has about 25 times the capacity of one lane of highway.

Nate

NovaWolverine
February 18th, 2007, 11:23 PM
One thing that is prevalent in our area is that we need to fix the stigmas that exist with transit. And we need to concentrate on diversifying our system to accomodate more people in different situations and areas. We'll still need to expand and improve roads at times, but we need to understand that there are many ways, HRT,LRT,BRT and commuter rail, and I really hope commuter rail can become more successful for the people from outside the area who clog some of the main highways in our inner areas.

SWM
February 19th, 2007, 03:25 AM
Will most of the structural development be on the bases? or lot-o civilian jobs? Have concepts been flying out the ddors, or is it still too early? Is Aberdeen still going by APG or is it being renamed since they are moving the test range? SOOO many questions!