View Full Version : NYC: Bloomberg Draws a Blueprint for a Greener City


krull
April 23rd, 2007, 09:22 AM
Bloomberg Draws a Blueprint for a Greener City


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/04/22/nyregion/23mayor-600.jpg
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg laid out a series of Earth Day proposals on Sunday at the American Museum
of Natural History.


By THOMAS J. LUECK
Published: April 23, 2007

In a quarter-century plan to create what he called “the first environmentally sustainable 21st-century city,” Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg proposed a sweeping and politically contentious vision yesterday of 127 projects, regulations and innovations for New York and the region.

The plan is intended to foster steady population growth, with the city expected to gain about 1 million residents by 2030, and to put in place a host of environmentally sensitive measures that would reduce the greenhouse gases it generates.

Mr. Bloomberg also set the parameters for what could be a large piece of his legacy as mayor. In an address outlining the plan yesterday at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan, Mr. Bloomberg likened it to the first blueprints for Central Park more than 100 years ago and the construction of Rockefeller Center in the Great Depression.

Many elements of the plan will face political hurdles in Albany and will depend on huge financial commitments from the state and federal governments, not to mention future mayors. To start, Mr. Bloomberg intends to add hundreds of millions of dollars to his proposed $57 billion budget for the next fiscal year, his aides said yesterday.

“Our economy is humming, our fiscal house is in order and our near-term horizon looks bright,” Mr. Bloomberg said. “If we don’t act now, when?”

The mayor chose Earth Day to give his speech and to release the details of his proposals. As widely predicted, the plan calls for an $8-a-day charge for people who drive their cars into Manhattan below 86th Street. The proposal for “congestion pricing,” which City Hall believes would reduce traffic and auto emissions while raising money for transportation projects, has already been met by harsh criticism from drivers and some officials outside Manhattan.

Other proposals in the plan, dubbed PlaNYC by the mayor’s staff, range from building huge capital projects and creating government authorities to implementing relatively benign initiatives in housing, transportation and land use.

One proposal calls for investments of $200 million a year from both the city and state to create a financing authority that would assure the completion of major projects like the Second Avenue subway. New authorities, with representatives from the city, state and private industry, would push for improved energy efficiency in new buildings and for the replacement of energy-guzzling power plants.

The city also would encourage the construction of platforms over railyards and highways to create land for housing. In addition, the plan would open 290 schoolyards as playgrounds, eliminate city sales taxes on energy-efficient hybrid vehicles, increase the number of bike paths and cultivate mussels to suck pollution out of the rivers.

Much of the plan, including its most costly proposals, would require state approval. Gov. Eliot Spitzer did not attend Mr. Bloomberg’s address, although another governor — Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, who appeared via videotape on two large screens — introduced the mayor.

Governor Spitzer, in a brief statement released late yesterday, said: “The mayor has released a comprehensive plan with admirable goals, especially the commitment to reduce energy consumption, and we look forward to reviewing the plan.”

Mr. Bloomberg’s initiative could be vulnerable to changes at City Hall and to setbacks in the economy.

But several observers praised it as a much-needed master plan for growth and the environment in a city that has let too many decades pass without such a vision.

“How you follow through on this is a huge political question, but it is a good time to be pushing it,” said Diana Fortuna, president of the Citizens Budget Committee. Ms. Fortuna was among several hundred people invited to the mayor’s speech, many of them associated with the 150 advocacy groups that had provided recommendations to Mr. Bloomberg.

The mayor acknowledged that the proposal for congestion pricing was the most contentious, calling it “the elephant in the room.”

Under the plan, the city would charge $8 for cars and $21 for commercial trucks that enter Manhattan below 86th Street from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays. The charge would be $4 for drivers within Manhattan, and several exemptions would apply. No one would be charged on the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive or the West Side Highway. There would be no charge for moving cars to comply with alternate side parking, and there would be no charge for taxis.

A similar system is in place in congested parts of London and Singapore, where Mr. Bloomberg said it had been shown to reduce congestion and improve air quality. In Manhattan, cameras and other equipment at intersections would deduct money from a driver’s E-ZPass account or photograph a car’s license plate, with the driver given two days to pay the fee through the mail, online or at certain stores.

The city said yesterday that it intended to seek state approval for a three-year test of congestion pricing and would need to spend $225 million to buy and install traffic-recording equipment. Officials said the city and state could jointly apply for grants from the United States Department of Transportation to cover those costs.

“The federal government really does want to be helpful,” Mr. Bloomberg said, in a rare departure from his prepared text.

Later, Mary E. Peters, the United States secretary of transportation, issued a statement praising the plan as “the kind of bold thinking leaders across the country need to embrace if we hope to win the battle against traffic congestion.”

The Nassau County executive, Thomas R. Suozzi, who has many constituents who commute by car to Manhattan, also was enthusiastic. “People’s first reaction is they don’t want to pay,” he said. “But getting them to switch to mass transit benefits us all.”

Mr. Bloomberg also called for improvements in express bus service and other public transportation in neighborhoods with little access to the subway, and where people are most inclined to drive into Manhattan for work or shopping. He said the city would complete those improvements before anyone is charged in the congestion pricing system.

Still, the reaction of many officials from outside Manhattan was cool. “I wonder if it is another hidden tax on working people,” said Adolfo Carrión Jr., the Bronx borough president. “I worry about people who need to use their cars to get to work.”

Money raised through congestion pricing would be added to the $400 million a year in combined city and state funds that the plan seeks for the creation of a new financing authority for transportation projects. The Sustainable Mobility and Regional Transportation Authority would issue bonds to award matching grants for projects by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and other agencies.

Mayor Bloomberg said yesterday that the added financial muscle was needed to close a $31 billion funding gap in 18 projects that are planned or underway, including the Second Avenue subway.

The new authority would be governed by a board with equal representation from the city and state. But it could provide a mechanism for Mr. Bloomberg and future mayors to reclaim some power over planning and capital expenditures by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. It is also a joint city and state agency, but one that has often been dominated by appointees of the governor.

In a prepared statement yesterday, officials from the authority said: “We applaud the mayor’s commitment to the transit system and will carefully analyze the city’s proposal to understand its impact on the M.T.A.”

Two other authorities, a New York City Energy Planning Board and an Energy Efficiency Authority, would be created to marshal investments that would finance energy conservation efforts and the construction of efficient power plants.

The plan also calls for a surcharge on electrical power customers, averaging $2.50 a month, with the money used to finance grants and other incentives for retrofitting buildings with energy-efficient materials. The new energy planning board, governed by city and state officials and utility executives, would make long-term commitments to buy energy from companies or investors who build efficient power plants.

In another measure, the city would plant more than 1 million trees in the next 10 years. It would offer incentives — intended to capture storm water runoff — for larger and deeper sidewalk tree pits and green roofs.

The plan calls for zoning changes in many neighborhoods with access to public transportation that would allow for larger homes and a higher density of housing, although such changes are often resisted in those neighborhoods.

It pledges that every New Yorker would live within a 10-minute walk from a park, and it calls for small public plazas in each community board district that does not have a park.

It would replace or modernize diesel-powered school buses in the city fleet and offer incentives to get heavy diesel trucks off the road. And it would commit city funds to clean up 7,600 acres of so-called brownfields, where soil has been polluted by chemicals or industrial materials. Some of the land would become parks.

Besides the introduction by Governor Schwarzenegger, Mr. Bloomberg’s address yesterday included videotaped praise by Tony Blair, the British prime minister, who made it clear the initiative was capturing the imagination of urban planners — if not necessarily the support it will need in Albany, Washington and neighborhoods outside Manhattan.

“This would mark out New York as a global leader in halting climate change,” Mr. Blair said.


Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/23/nyregion/23mayor.html?pagewanted=1&hp)

krull
April 23rd, 2007, 09:23 AM
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/04/22/nyregion/20070423_MAYOR_GRAPHIC.FULL.jpg

DarkLite
April 23rd, 2007, 09:34 AM
I'm glad he has took the initiative to tackle the problem. Do you think Bloomberg's doing a good job like Rudy did before he was mayor?

krull
April 23rd, 2007, 09:41 AM
I'm glad he has took the initiative to tackle the problem. Do you think Bloomberg's doing a good job like Rudy did before he was mayor?

I think he is much better than Rudy. Most people in NYC didn't and still don't like Rudy anyway. But most people are very satisfy with Bloomberg. I think he will be known as one of the best mayors in NYC history.

krull
April 23rd, 2007, 09:59 AM
BLOOMY GETS REEL-Y SNOOTY ON CAR FEE


By MAGGIE HABERMAN and TOM LIDDY
April 21, 2007

Hey, you can afford it.

Mayor Bloomberg scoffed at opponents of his $8 fee to drive into Manhattan, saying in effect that New Yorkers have the money to pay for it.
"It sounds like a lot of money," said Bloomberg, "but you go to the movies, it's 12 bucks . . . so let's put some of this stuff in perspective here."

Bloomberg confirmed on his weekly WABC radio show that he plans to announce a "congestion pricing" initiative - an $8 flat fee per trip to enter parts of Manhattan during high-traffic hours. He'll tell more in a speech tomorrow outlining his policy of managing the city's growth from now to 2030.

Pointing out that the cost of parking in Manhattan is already sky-high, Bloomberg said "people that drive into the city generally . . . tend to be people that can afford it because otherwise they'd take mass transit."

The cost of coming into Manhattan every weekday once over the course of a year would be $2,080 - and only taxis would be exempt.

When radio host John Gambling pointed out that some people will call it a tax, the mayor responded, "you can call it anything you want, I suppose. Is it a tax? Well, the guy who's collecting the 12 bucks when you go to the movies, is that a tax?"

But that analogy was blasted by outer-borough critics of the plan.

"I think the comparison is totally inapt - people don't have to go to the movies," said Brooklyn City Councilman Lew Fidler.

"Sometimes you have to go to Manhattan . . . the whole concept is incredibly elitist, and I think so is that comparison."

There are several unanswered questions about the plan, which sources said is a knockoff of one London put in place in 2003.

In New York, the fee would exempt taxi and livery cabs, as well as disabled drivers, but would include delivery trucks.

"It definitely will affect the smaller businessman the worse," said Ali Sham, a dispatcher at Deluxe Delivery in Long Island City, Queens. "That's not good for the business, for the drivers, nor for the customers"
With 20 trucks going into the Manhattan at least once a day, Ali's crew would have to shell out more than $40,000 a year.

The boundaries in which the fee would be charged remain unclear. It's also not known how the city would handle extra mass-transit commuters no longer driving cars into Manhattan.

Several sources said riders who use MTA and Port Authority bridges and tunnels would have the cost of tolls deducted from the $8 instead of paying an additional amount.

But the sources said there's deep concern about how that type of arrangement would work going forward if the tolls ever have to be raised, and how it would affect the MTA's and PA's ability to issue bonds in the future.

Kathy Wylde, head of the Partnership for New York City - which supports the measure - cited savings in travel time and gasoline costs.

"Our studies, and the London experience, show that delivery and maintenance trucks have enormous reductions in cost as a result of reduced traffic and the ability to move around the city," she said.

Aides to Gov. Spitzer, Republican Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno and Democratic Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver said they're waiting to see the plan before they comment.

But a source in the Republican-controlled Senate said, "It's not going to go anywhere . . . we don't understand what the mayor is up to."

Motorists had mixed opinions.

"I think [it's] crazy - why would they want to do that?" said Ricky Lowman, 32, a jewelry buyer from Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, who enters Manhattan daily. "I will not come in.

But Avi Goldstein, 41, of Lawrence, L.I., said, "If it will be less traffic for me coming in, I'd be happy to pay for it."


Copyright 2007 NYP Holdings, Inc. (http://www.nypost.com/seven/04212007/news/regionalnews/bloomy_gets_reel_y_snooty_on_car_fee_regionalnews_maggie_haberman_and_tom_liddy.htm?page=1)

krull
April 23rd, 2007, 10:01 AM
A Shady Plan by the Mayor That’s Likely to Be Popular


By RAY RIVERA
April 22, 2007

Among the list of contentious proposals that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is expected to announce today in his ambitious effort to steer the city toward a greener future, here’s one that is likely to receive little argument: more trees.

The city intends to plant a million trees during the next 10 years, filling every sidewalk vacancy with one and adding thousands to parks and public spaces.

City planners say the additional trees will help clean the air, soak up ozone-depleting carbon dioxide and make the city a little bit cooler in the summer, reducing energy demands.

“We believe this is the most ambitious tree-planting program ever undertaken, certainly by any American city,” said Daniel L. Doctoroff, the deputy mayor for economic development and rebuilding.

The proposal is one of 127 initiatives that the mayor’s staff unveiled yesterday in a briefing with reporters at City Hall. The briefing was held on condition that only the tree-planting proposal be revealed until Mr. Bloomberg announces the full plan in his Earth Day speech today at the American Museum of Natural History.

The plan will provide specifics on achieving and paying for each of the measures, which are intended to ease traffic congestion, increase affordable housing, reclaim contaminated land and improve mass transit as the city prepares to make room for an estimated 1 million new residents during the next two decades.

A key objective is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by 2030.

Despite Mr. Bloomberg’s efforts to keep the details secret, many elements of the plan have leaked out in recent days, including a controversial measure to charge drivers to enter the busiest areas of Manhattan. Another proposal calls for the creation of an authority to finance major infrastructure improvements and, in the process, wrest some control over large-scale projects from agencies like the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Empire State Development Corporation, over which the city has little say.

Few people, however, are likely to object to another tree on their block, especially in areas where concrete overwhelms any hint of green.

The city estimates it has about 5.2 million trees, covering about 24 percent of the five boroughs’ land mass. The national average for cities is about 27 percent. A little more than 592,000 of New York’s trees are planted along the street, and the city would like to increase that number by 210,000 during the next decade.

Joshua Laird, assistant commissioner of planning for the city’s Parks and Recreation Department, said it will cost about $37 million annually to plant and maintain 1 million more trees.

In addition to cleaner air and reduced energy demands that new trees would bring, Mr. Laird said they also would capture more storm water runoff, reducing pollution in the rivers.

The plan also would require trees to be planted at new developments.

Officials said they hope the program will stop the city’s long history of losing trees to development. Between 1984 and 2002, New York lost some 9,000 acres of vegetative cover, according to city estimates.

“If you think about the history of New York City,” Mr. Doctoroff said, “this fundamentally reverses the history of deforestation that has taken place pretty much since the city was settled.”


Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/22/nyregion/22mayor.html?_r=1&ref=nyregion&oref=slogin)

Don Omar
April 23rd, 2007, 09:44 PM
i guess a tree will grow in Brooklyn
haha

This is a great move by Bloomberg and for the city.

Don Omar
April 23rd, 2007, 09:49 PM
http://static.flickr.com/82/222920214_3d64ab4e9c_o.jpg

hkskyline
May 4th, 2007, 06:38 AM
I thought Manhattan was fairly leafy already. Would more trees get in the way of pedestrians? I can't imagine more trees to hog over the sidewalks along Fifth or AoA.

pokistic
May 8th, 2007, 11:18 PM
Wow sounds good! Go NYC!

Xusein
May 8th, 2007, 11:35 PM
I like this plan a lot. It's very ambitious and forward-thinking.

TalB
May 9th, 2007, 03:55 AM
I think that the congestion pricing will hardly work, not to mention that most of those that contribute to global warming happen to be heavy vehichles rather than just regular cars.

PresidentBjork
May 13th, 2007, 01:25 AM
Sounds like a bunch of good plans,
- and a few trees always makes a street look better, along with all the other benefits.

romanamerican
May 13th, 2007, 10:47 PM
I hope that words will be followed by actions, and if this happens, i couldn't wish for anything better!!

RafflesCity
August 10th, 2007, 04:25 AM
THE GREENING OF NEW YORK

In the footsteps of Stockholm, S'pore and London

By James D. Wolfensohn

IN THE coming days, the United States will make a critical decision that has the potential to change America's standing in the world: whether to approve a US$537 million (S$815 million) grant that will help make New York City the first environmentally sustainable megacity in the 21st century.
Officials at the US Department of Transportation must appreciate that their decision to fund Mayor Michael Bloomberg's visionary project, called PlaNYC, will determine the quality of air that more than 10 million New Yorkers breathe daily and the amount of carbon dioxide emissions the city coughs into the atmosphere.

Already, New York City produces more CO2 emissions than all of Norway. More importantly, officials must realise that their actions will shape America's response to the global challenge of unparalleled urbanisation and carbon-induced climate change.

This year, for the first time in human history, more people will live in urban areas than rural communities. In the US, the urban population has grown from 97 million in 1950 to 222 million in 2000. Today, nearly 80 per cent of Americans live in urban areas. Such unprecedented and unplanned urbanisation wreaks environmental havoc by increasing carbon emissions, since higher population density results in greater automobile and energy use.

PlaNYC encourages the use of public transportation systems by creating powerful disincentives to automobile use. The plan's proposed congestion charge on automobile use during peak times in certain parts of the city would reduce traffic and generate revenue that would go towards improving public transportation.

Mayor Bloomberg's plan comes at the right time for a city burdened by worsening traffic and pollution problems. Vehicles cause nearly a fifth of New York City's CO2 emissions. Traffic congestion, in particular, is not only environmentally detrimental but also imposes substantial time and resource costs on drivers.

Americans lose around 3.7 billion hours and 8.7 billion litres of fuel sitting in traffic jams. This implies an annual cost of around US$200 billion. Due to congestion, New Yorkers face the longest commutes in the US, and their children have the highest rate of asthma hospitalisation.

PlaNYC would impose the congestion charge on the 4.6 per cent of New York City residents who drive to work, while its benefits would accrue to everyone. New Yorkers would enjoy cleaner air, shorter average commuting time and better public transportation.

Neither the economy in general, nor the retail sector in particular, should be adversely affected. In fact, service and delivery providers in Manhattan, among others, would benefit from shorter travel times and fewer delays.

However, despite its many advantages, congestion charges face some scepticism. Fortunately, we can learn from other cities such as Stockholm, Singapore and London which have successfully implemented them. In all of these cities, CO2 emissions declined sharply and congestion was significantly reduced, with Singapore experiencing an immediate 45 per cent drop in traffic.

These cities have also benefited from more efficient public transportation. In London, bus travel rose by 46 per cent. According to an independent report, almost 60 per cent of the businesses in London judged the programme's impact on the economy as positive or neutral.

Countries that are automobile-dependent, like America, need smart solutions to ensure environmentally sustainable development. The US, which has one of the largest urban populations and the highest per capita CO2 emissions, has the responsibility - and the means - to lead the world on this front.

If the US does not act soon, American cities will lag behind not only European capitals but also developing-country cities such as Bogota (Colombia) and Curitiba (Brazil), which are already implementing innovative environmentally friendly solutions. New York City has always been a global leader in finance, the arts and many other fields. It is an ideal candidate for creating a blueprint for cleaner and more efficient urbanisation in the US and the world.


James D. Wolfensohn is a former president of the World Bank.

Copyright: Project Syndicate