View Full Version : INCHEON | Incheon Tower | 487m | 1597ft | 102 fl | Prep


Pages : 1 2 [3]

spectre000
August 23rd, 2010, 06:32 AM
Doesn't sound very good. I hope this still gets built.

chang4
August 25th, 2010, 04:57 PM
I hope this will get built. It's my favourite proposed project.

kl 2020 ideas
September 3rd, 2010, 09:09 AM
Well, if it is built then it will knock off Petronas Twin Tower's tallest twin tower status off, but it is magnificent that it holded the title for 12 years (9 years in terms from ground to roof because WTC was destroyed)

KillerZavatar
September 3rd, 2010, 05:40 PM
Well, if it is built then it will knock off Petronas Twin Tower's tallest twin tower status off, but it is magnificent that it holded the title for 12 years (9 years in terms from ground to roof because WTC was destroyed)

even more since incheon 151 needs a lot more time to be finished since its only prep now. i hope they build it though

korea2002
September 5th, 2010, 02:58 PM
current Progress is all-stop Incheon Tower,please more movements....
Focus in this month!
in this month(september),Mayor will announce Presentation about 151 Incheon Tower Construction Program.

KillerZavatar
September 5th, 2010, 05:25 PM
current Progress is all-stop Incheon Tower,please more movements....
Focus in this month!
in this month(september),Mayor will announce Presentation about 151 Incheon Tower Construction Program.
progression is slow, but its nice to hear that the project isnt dead. i hope everything works out so preparation can continue

boschb
September 8th, 2010, 04:47 AM
Korea needs this!
im praying :ohno:

krkseg1ops
September 8th, 2010, 11:17 AM
No country in the world needs such a tower but I'm praying for it too!

korea2002
September 8th, 2010, 11:26 AM
1.Incheon city mayor will cancel Development of the 151 Incheon Tower and revise Neighborhood.(Songdo Landmark City-6,8 district of Songdo Int'l City).

2.according to Recent Constructin News(2010/9/8),151 Incheon Tower Authority(developer,related Agency) will revise Development Concept(from 151 to 100)because of Financial Problem.

Myster E
September 8th, 2010, 12:09 PM
All these hypertalls in S Korea, are they just pie in the sky? Either they're cut down a few hundred metres or they don't get built, it's getting people's hopes up but I can't say i'm surprised.

KillerZavatar
September 8th, 2010, 04:11 PM
All these hypertalls in S Korea, are they just pie in the sky? Either they're cut down a few hundred metres or they don't get built, it's getting people's hopes up but I can't say i'm surprised.

i only hope for one of those towers getting built, then im good with it^^

korea2002
September 9th, 2010, 03:34 AM
i only hope for one of those towers getting built, then im good with it^^

151 Incheon Tower's height may cut down minimum 100m(Maximum:200m).

BREVIN117
September 9th, 2010, 06:29 AM
151 Incheon Tower's height may cut down minimum 100m(Maximum:200m).

nooooo you cannot be serious! 100-200m that's it? That's horrible!

korea2002
September 10th, 2010, 03:53 AM
nooooo you cannot be serious! 100-200m that's it? That's horrible!

yeah. Believe or not! I will write Related incheon tower News soon.

Eastern37
September 10th, 2010, 07:51 AM
^^ does that mean cut down from 600m to 500-400m or will it actually be 100-200m??

korea2002
September 11th, 2010, 11:13 AM
^^ does that mean cut down from 600m to 500-400m or will it actually be 100-200m??

yes. it will.

Eastern37
September 11th, 2010, 11:51 PM
^^ that doesn't answer my question :bash:

BOM
September 12th, 2010, 08:37 AM
This is disappointing :(

Yet I would not be surprised that once the economy picks up again there will be another supertall proposal someplace else in Incheon, while this tower will still be in a quagmire.

SirAdrian
September 12th, 2010, 06:05 PM
yes. it will.
Q: Is it A or B?
A: Yes it is!
:tongue2:

èđđeůx
September 13th, 2010, 02:37 AM
This is disappointing :(

Yet I would not be surprised that once the economy picks up again there will be another supertall proposal someplace else in Incheon, while this tower will still be in a quagmire.

that is okay with me.

KillerZavatar
September 13th, 2010, 11:22 AM
Q: Is it A or B?
A: Yes it is!
:tongue2:

my exgf did that a lot, i mean WTF :D

korea2002
October 3rd, 2010, 06:38 AM
http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/219/189ov.jpg

Over there~!!(right sites)

Landmark city Reclamation works-2010.10.1
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8940/169jri.jpg

My Kafkaesque life
October 8th, 2010, 03:45 PM
Landmark city Reclamation works-2010.10.1


Cool pics! Been to Seoul this year and saw how much is being worked around Incheon. The whole city is awesome. And this supertall will be one of Korea's landmarks. Can't wait to see it :)

spectre000
October 9th, 2010, 06:27 AM
So they're working on reclaiming more land?? I'd build on what you've got first before getting anymore. The whole place looks barren as it is.

architec101
October 13th, 2010, 05:55 PM
No matter what the circumstance is, they must push this building project forward. That's the Korean spirit, folks!

boschb
October 15th, 2010, 06:57 AM
I highly doubt they will put much more effort into this now, this is a stale proposal :ohno:

KillerZavatar
October 15th, 2010, 02:13 PM
I highly doubt they will put much more effort into this now, this is a stale proposal :ohno:
:badnews:

korea2002
November 13th, 2010, 07:20 PM
Yellow-Incheon Bridge
Blue-Songdo Landmark City's Reclamation Area
Red-151 Incheon Tower's Main site(no movement).

Recent News(not rumor)
Developer will reduce 151 Incheon Tower's floor and Development size(from 151 to 102)

102 Incheon Tower?
not 151 Incheon tower... maybe..
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/7072/45810026.jpg

Blue Flame
November 16th, 2010, 01:34 AM
Well.......... It is dissapointing that they have decided to lower it, but as long as they build it at 102 floors, it will still be a supertall, and likely the tallest building in the city. I would rather they lower it then not build it at all.

KillerZavatar
November 16th, 2010, 05:30 PM
in how far is this prep though?

korea2002
November 28th, 2010, 07:48 AM
Songdo Landmark City 'development plans, and modify the front

23 days Incheon Free Economic Zone Authority Incheon Tower in Songdo International City's 151-storey building is scheduled for 6 ‧ 8 tools, such as lowering of the 'landmark Songdo City' development plan, a plan to fix the front as geomtoki said.

Day Incheon Free Economic Zone Authority, the U.S. real estate business of this tool sihaengsa Portman Group because of the real estate recession floor 100 floor 151 to lift the tower height, greatly reduce the proposed scheme, on the Incheon city council, such as pointing out the problems of the development plan originally Development Plan Review for the front got into modifying said.

Yihangu council member, "Songdo Landmark City, specifying the purpose and intent in the free economic zone projects are being driven incorrectly," and "development gain profits through a thorough investigation, and so on recovery and development plan review is needed," he said .

Portman consortium Song 6 ‧ 8 583 thousand ㎡ tools to invest 8.87 trillion won for this project Incheon Tower (construction cost 3 trillion won) comes to international business and tourism just ‧ leisure, residential, cultural, educational, sports complexes, etc. the composition is in the business.

The Agency for economic feasibility of the site to 2.4 million won per 3.3 ㎡ wongain composition is meant to supply.

Meanwhile, the Free Economic Zone Authority, however, the economic downturn and business expenses due to difficulties in procuring floors says he got the cash, or its intention to return to the site plan has been reviewed.

Gyeongjecheong officials "to maintain as possible, but difficult, if layer 151 accordingly come up with ways to recover the policy proceeds," he revealed a significant natchwojil seems floors.

Focus-Songdo Landmark City(Songdo 6,8 District Developemt Official Name-including 151 Incheon Tower Development) will minimize Development's size,151 Incheon Tower's Development,too.

151 Incheon Tower's Floor will be 100 floor,Portman Hodlings Submited '151 Incheon Tower and Songdo Landmark City's Plan Modification' to IFEZ Authority.

korea2002
November 28th, 2010, 07:50 AM
Well.......... It is dissapointing that they have decided to lower it, but as long as they build it at 102 floors, it will still be a supertall, and likely the tallest building in the city. I would rather they lower it then not build it at all.

yeah. me ,too!
not Cancelingl,but reducing Development plan is realistic Countermeasures.

jutinyoung
November 28th, 2010, 12:10 PM
A super tall of 600m is NOT necessary for any country in this world, at least for now it is not, even i really look forward to this stunning giant, and it definately will surpise the world if be finished, but````` it's only a building, isn't it?

boschb
December 3rd, 2010, 04:19 AM
^^ yeah 400m would still be great even 300m would be great hopefully nothing below that lol

korea2002
January 8th, 2011, 07:38 AM
2011/1/6
http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/1318/17966556.jpg

sepul
January 8th, 2011, 07:09 PM
i like this project

architec101
January 9th, 2011, 06:25 PM
A super tall of 600m is NOT necessary for any country in this world, at least for now it is not, even i really look forward to this stunning giant, and it definately will surpise the world if be finished, but````` it's only a building, isn't it?
The tallest such as the Burj Dubai may not be really neccessary but it is the symbolism that counts. I want to say that if they are going to build one, don't build a mediocre that no one cares to have a second look. South Korea needs one magnificant enough to get others' attention. Korea has talked about many super skyscrapers, to my dismay, there has not been one yet. That's a shame. South Korea should have had one already since it has a large economy and population to support super talls.

BarbaricManchurian
January 9th, 2011, 06:32 PM
so this is like the 20th or so failed Korean megatall (over 350m)?

spectre000
January 9th, 2011, 06:56 PM
so this is like the 20th or so failed Korean megatall (over 350m)?

Seems like it. The proposal was just all wrong. Too large and in a bad location. There trying to create a destination out of nothing. A project like this needs to be built in an already existing CBD, where they can lure tenants and people much easier.

KillerZavatar
January 9th, 2011, 07:58 PM
why does the headline say Prep then?

Munwon
January 9th, 2011, 08:48 PM
Don't worry this tower will be built, It just will be shorter than the original height.

Munwon
February 9th, 2011, 10:42 AM
Drove by this a few days ago on my way from the airport. There was equipment on the site. Not sure on what it was, but the site wasn't totally barren like in the last update. If I have time this weekend I will pay Seoul Lite a visit!!

giovani kun
February 9th, 2011, 11:47 AM
^^ that will be a great idea :)

KillerZavatar
February 9th, 2011, 03:49 PM
the title says its prep, it seems more like its still not too sure though. great when you ask, hope we soon know the final height

ajwijaya
February 16th, 2011, 02:30 PM
Dreamer Project for Korea We Will See

krkseg1ops
May 3rd, 2011, 02:41 PM
What's going on with this project? Is it dead or what?

korea2002
May 5th, 2011, 04:17 AM
What's going on with this project? Is it dead or what?

Don't decide early! Incheon Tower's Development Including Songdo Landmark City(Whole Project Name) is under way.

General Controversy of Incheon Tower's Development Progress

*Incheon Authorities(Incheon Metropolitan City,IFEZA)

http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/9288/20110504175518340711.jpg
Quoted sentence-“151층 인천타워는 현실적으로 건립이 불가능하다. 층수를 조정해야 할 것으로 보인다”
* Incheon Mayor said.' Incheon Tower's Development is feasible(Undevelopmentable) and Fail Project(Financing work's Failure),but I will change this project's Overall Masterplan-not cancel but Change(Modification of the project).

*Developer(Songdo Landmark City Limited Corp),Contractor(Samsung and Hyundai)

http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/571/110503191.jpg
Quoted Sentence-인천타워를 사업이 가능한 수준으로 조정한다는 것은 동의한다. 하지만 다른 부지의 사업까지 계획을 변경하면 너무 많은 비용과 시간이 들어간다”-Said Songdo Landmark City Director Se-wook,Lim.
' We can't cancel Incheon Tower Project!,but we will change Development.'(floor and Height's change-102 floor,400~500m)

in fact,Developer submitted Development Plan of the Songdo Landmark City and 151 Incheon Tower(Revision-2010.12.18).

*Current Progress*

IFEZA(Development Authorites) and Developer is discussing about Incheon Tower's Floor and Height.







Funky News ! :):banana:

http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/2478/nisi201104270004443282w.jpg
Samsung Group invested Bio Plant in Songdo International City. Samsung Come in!!! Congratulations!

korea2002
May 5th, 2011, 05:26 AM
Written in Related Documents ' Phase 1 Achivement Result and Phase 2 Development Strategy of IFEZ'-'IFEZ 1단계 발전 성과 및 2단계 발전 전략'.

http://www.ifez.go.kr/EgovFileDown.do?original=IFEZ_1단계_성과_및_2단계_발전전략_.pdf&filename=IFEZ_1단계_성과_및_2단계_발전전략_.pdf&path2=/webdata/egovProps/hoon/MBoardFiles/14/

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/3015/21767608.jpg
Target Enterprise of Incheon Tower's Tenant

Strategic Investor- Contractor,Hotel and Serviced Residence Possession Owner,Golf Club Developer,Shopping Mall and Retail Developer

Financial Investor- Equity and Loan Company including Investment Bank, Procrastination's Interest,Insurance Company,Asset Management Company.

Target Group of Incheon Tower's Tenant

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/3410/tenant5.jpg
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/1610/tenant1.jpg
http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/6996/tenant2.jpg
http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/6736/tenant4.jpg
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/9130/tenant3.jpg

Target Group Name-100's Fortune Multinational Group- Bank of America, Citi Group,HSBC(Hong Kong Shanghai Bank),PwC(Accountant),Mckinsey,Bain,Honeywell,Siemens,HP,Oracle,Hutchinson,DP World.

korea2002
May 5th, 2011, 05:32 AM
http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/2811/unledsj.jpg

patrykus
May 5th, 2011, 08:29 AM
' We can't cancel Incheon Tower Project!,but we will change Development.'(floor and Height's change-102 floor,400~500m)


It's great it still have a chance to have at least 500m. With that height it still may have good proportions and look nice. If I remember right there was a rumor it could end up as 300m tall, and that would destroy the design.

architec101
August 19th, 2011, 05:15 PM
It's great it still have a chance to have at least 500m. With that height it still may have good proportions and look nice. If I remember right there was a rumor it could end up as 300m tall, and that would destroy the design.
Korea needs a supertall, not another forgetable mediocre. Perhaps, this project was not worth an enthuasm. I would suggest that they should come up with something more substantial.

krkseg1ops
August 19th, 2011, 09:53 PM
A mediocre? If they built this in original form, it would be the most beautiful 'twin' in whole history of skyscrapers.

architec101
August 20th, 2011, 03:52 PM
A mediocre? If they built this in original form, it would be the most beautiful 'twin' in whole history of skyscrapers.
Your enthuasm about the project impresses me but the tower does not. Mediocre just means settling with a shorter tower. I hope they won't if they go ahead with this project.

Im Using A Computer
August 21st, 2011, 03:36 AM
Would suck if this got cancelled. One of the nicest supertall proposals I've seen.

inno4321
August 21st, 2011, 04:16 AM
Would suck if this got cancelled. One of the nicest supertall proposals I've seen.

You right
But plan changed from 150 floors to 70 floors.:cheers:

korea2002
September 3rd, 2011, 05:09 AM
in Recent News(September 2nd),Incheon Tower will be reduced into 102 floor.
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/8933/40f1b6d2773f977b092c14d.jpg
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/760/f3060a9e6008869f4df62f5.jpg
http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/6615/6e2b543d44e99fd1f6b0ca2.jpg
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/1223/3b47ac8f597e597edbf0413.jpg
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/7669/4d89d720909bfac3888c1a1.jpg
http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/499/9114a5a50b9817a93c914e0.jpg
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/7519/366a6e0fa404d2a0ee97b0b.jpg
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/5665/8dab0ef16400dd2a0203f8e.jpg

Source-www.Portmanholdings.com

Thanial
September 3rd, 2011, 06:02 AM
looks great! i don't mind the height decrease seeing as they kept the original design. I can't wait to see some new exterior renders, and not just pictures of the model.

patrykus
September 3rd, 2011, 10:25 AM
^^ me neither. The proportions still looks great. And it will be great if they build this like on these renders. That crazy podium :lol: I just want to see this :)

blacktrojan3921
September 3rd, 2011, 10:54 AM
Incheon 102... I'll dig into that ;)

korea2002
September 3rd, 2011, 01:08 PM
151 → 102-story Incheon Tower floor seemed to decrease

Songdo International City, Incheon Songdo Landmark City 공구 6.8 (151-story Incheon Tower) project by the 151-story Incheon Tower collapsed on the floor height adjustment is scheduled to finish negotiations soon, said the 31st. The city announced last Thursday of the financial stabilization measures 5 6.8 공구 Songdo International City for water exchange sites.151 → 102-story Incheon Tower floor seemed to decrease

droneriot
September 3rd, 2011, 01:13 PM
I really like the round base with the near-horizontal crossbraces.

KillerZavatar
September 3rd, 2011, 03:29 PM
i actually dont care much that its now "only" 102 floors. its still pretty high and im good with that :)

korea2002
October 14th, 2011, 01:53 AM
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/6507/60388736.jpg

Thanial
October 14th, 2011, 02:59 AM
NO! The other design is fantastic that's just ugly! Looks too much like Seoul Lite :down: hope it's not final :ohno:

Munwon
October 14th, 2011, 03:29 AM
Is this the design for Incheon Tower and not Seoul LITE Korea2002?

korea2002
October 14th, 2011, 07:50 AM
Is this the design for Incheon Tower and not Seoul LITE Korea2002?

yes

krkseg1ops
October 14th, 2011, 09:41 AM
What is this treachery! Gawd!!! :mad: Why did they change such a beautiful design to this abomination? Nooooooo

krkseg1ops
October 14th, 2011, 09:43 AM
Ok, after few glances I admit the project is not that bad but compared to the old one is still crap.

KillerZavatar
October 14th, 2011, 12:17 PM
turning one of the most beautiful architectural designs and turning it into a blant boring tower doesnt do the building justice :(. i mean the last design is probably pretty massive and may look nice too, when finished, but we all will have in mind what the previous design was. :ohno:

Munwon
October 14th, 2011, 02:10 PM
relax guys. I think the press got Seoul Lite and Incheon 101 mixed up. Its obviously a shorter Seoul Lite version.

aquaticko
October 14th, 2011, 04:47 PM
Can't they just shorten the old 610m proposal? It seems like the kind of design that could be shortened, and at least everyone here seems to like it (I know I do), so I'm really hoping that's what they do in the end.

inno4321
October 14th, 2011, 04:50 PM
relax guys. I think the press got Seoul Lite and Incheon 101 mixed up. Its obviously a shorter Seoul Lite version.

Correct comment

Kimiwind1184
March 3rd, 2012, 12:27 AM
Is there is any recent news on this baby? Damn, I'm looking forward to see this built, (especially if they keep the original design).

korea2002
March 3rd, 2012, 08:16 AM
Is there is any recent news on this baby? Damn, I'm looking forward to see this built, (especially if they keep the original design).

Incheon Tower News will be released in May..

Caleb15
May 22nd, 2012, 03:35 PM
Any news?