ZimasterX
August 9th, 2007, 12:39 AM
Maybe this is one of my stupid theories, or maybe its the greatest idea ever imagined.
After scanning over photos of commieblocks from Former Yugoslavia, Eastern Europe, the Caucuses, and Central Asia, I noticed a strange trend. We all know of course that when communism fell, there were winners and there were loosers (some economies went up and some went down). Generally I noticed that the blocks in fast growing, former satellite EE countries were better quality than those in the former Soviet Union itself. Considering that commieblocks were mostly all built during the same time period. In general I'd say commies in the Former SFRJ, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Czechia were the best quality overall. In the former USSR, commies looked much more run down and decayed, but even there it has a hierarchy on quality. Generally the most prosperous countries (per capita that is) have best quality, while least prosperous have worst quality. Who what I want to understand is, was the difference in quality because is some countries, construction of commieblocks was just better quality overall, or was the gap in quality widened due to economic upheaval, which could have led to a possible neglect. (This should in no way apply to new commieblocks, but mainly to those from the 70s and 80s)
Here some photos to visualize what I mean.
Former SFRJ
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/850105.jpg
Slovakia
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/47/145027912_29f03a44f4_o.jpg
Poland
http://i16.tinypic.com/52gek5w.jpg
Russia
http://i9.tinypic.com/5zh3qbk.jpg
Ukraine
http://www.panoramio.com/photos/original/3784775.jpg
Georgia
http://i10.tinypic.com/6bbwnso.jpg
After scanning over photos of commieblocks from Former Yugoslavia, Eastern Europe, the Caucuses, and Central Asia, I noticed a strange trend. We all know of course that when communism fell, there were winners and there were loosers (some economies went up and some went down). Generally I noticed that the blocks in fast growing, former satellite EE countries were better quality than those in the former Soviet Union itself. Considering that commieblocks were mostly all built during the same time period. In general I'd say commies in the Former SFRJ, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Czechia were the best quality overall. In the former USSR, commies looked much more run down and decayed, but even there it has a hierarchy on quality. Generally the most prosperous countries (per capita that is) have best quality, while least prosperous have worst quality. Who what I want to understand is, was the difference in quality because is some countries, construction of commieblocks was just better quality overall, or was the gap in quality widened due to economic upheaval, which could have led to a possible neglect. (This should in no way apply to new commieblocks, but mainly to those from the 70s and 80s)
Here some photos to visualize what I mean.
Former SFRJ
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/850105.jpg
Slovakia
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/47/145027912_29f03a44f4_o.jpg
Poland
http://i16.tinypic.com/52gek5w.jpg
Russia
http://i9.tinypic.com/5zh3qbk.jpg
Ukraine
http://www.panoramio.com/photos/original/3784775.jpg
Georgia
http://i10.tinypic.com/6bbwnso.jpg