View Full Version : Chicago HDRs
srika August 17th, 2007, 02:06 AM a few shots from the past weeks - starting to really get my feet wet with HDR.
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_marina_hdr.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_unitrin_hdr.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicagojb_hdr.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicagoriver_hdr.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicagoriver2_hdr.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_stateofillinois_3lights_hdr.jpg
shot of Clark Street Bridge at Wacker Drive
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicagoriver3_hdr.jpg
pic 1 with different colors
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_marina_test_hdr.jpg
cbotnyse August 17th, 2007, 02:40 AM nice! I'm really gonna start learning how to do this. A tripod is a must, right?
srika August 17th, 2007, 11:45 AM nice! I'm really gonna start learning how to do this. A tripod is a must, right?
Yeah.. but I only used one for 2 shots above. For the rest, I used ledges and other stationary points of balance. But, tripod is optimal.
Chicagophotoshop August 17th, 2007, 05:22 PM Yeah.. but I only used one for 2 shots above. For the rest, I used ledges and other stationary points of balance. But, tripod is optimal.
do you use photomatrix? do you have any pre-saved tone mapping settings that you load? or just a case by case basis.
I can not seem to get tone mapping right
srika August 17th, 2007, 06:16 PM do you use photomatrix? do you have any pre-saved tone mapping settings that you load? or just a case by case basis.
I can not seem to get tone mapping right
Yeah Photomatix.. no I don't have any presets, I do them case by case. And, I still have a lot to learn, these are pretty cooked. Need to get a better balance. There is an infinite amount of possibilities though, it's great. I mean, everything is in the eye of the beholder.
ozzman August 17th, 2007, 08:51 PM whoa! how do you do this?
srika August 17th, 2007, 11:00 PM whoa! how do you do this?
hey man, check out these links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging
http://www.vanilladays.com/hdr-guide/
http://www.hdrsoft.com/support/faq_photomatix.html#tips
http://www.popphoto.com/hdr
This gives you a good idea of the kinds of exposures you should get with your shots:
http://www.hdrsoft.com/examples.html
If you don't have the Photomatix software, you can download the Trial version (http://www.hdrsoft.com/download.html) and use that - it will put a Photomatix watermark in the pic but at least you can try it out.
Here is info on Merging to HDR using Photoshop CS3:
http://www.photoshopsupport.com/photoshop-cs3/hdr-high-dynamic-range/index.html
ozzman August 17th, 2007, 11:39 PM Far from as good as the others, but I will play around with it some more. HDR pictures just look so amazing.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1219/1152852036_f189a85900_b.jpg
srika August 17th, 2007, 11:45 PM wow you did it that fast??? impressive! :P yours looks good! See there are a few "schools" of thought regarding HDR, from what I have seen. There is the more subtle, "natural" looking ones, that are just bringing out the dark areas while preserving the light... then there is a little more dramatic, then there is like, "shock and awe", which I believe is the one I subscribe to. lol. imo though there is no necessary "wrong" or "right", it's just about the vision of the creator. And that's the great beauty of it.
ozzman August 17th, 2007, 11:50 PM Your pictures are truly amazing. I love the way the colors just pop out of the picture. I took my picture yesterday when the clouds were just too puffy and overcast so the shadows just don't allow them to really pop out. I obviously have lots of practice and fooling around to do.
srika August 24th, 2007, 10:56 AM got a few yesterday, wish I could have got more but I was at work..
facing Southeast, from Wacker Drive
http://srika.com/img/misc/IMG_1070_2_4_6_tonemapped.jpg
facing West, from Wacker Drive
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicagowest02.jpg
facing West, from Wacker Drive
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicagowest01.jpg
cbotnyse August 24th, 2007, 03:14 PM excellent! I love them. I've been waiting for this rain to stop so I can get out and try some for myself!
ozzman August 24th, 2007, 08:44 PM here is the view from my balcony a couple nights ago. i need to get photomatix so i can get rid of the waterprint!
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1398/1170526519_f718ac6672.jpg
srika August 25th, 2007, 01:05 AM hey nice view man! heres a couple from this afternoon:
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/IMG_1236_28_30_32_34_800.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/IMG_1276_4_5_tonemapped_800.jpg
srika August 25th, 2007, 09:33 AM can you guess where I went tonight? :lol:
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_hdr_night03.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_loop_hdr_srika.jpg
http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_hdr_night04.jpg
i_am_hydrogen August 26th, 2007, 08:42 AM Great shots. The biggest disadvantage of HDR is the noticeable degradation in quality. What lens did you use to take the last shot? Wide enough to capture so much of the skyline.
cbotnyse August 26th, 2007, 09:07 AM what did you use to get the shots? (since you cant use a tripod up there)
srika August 27th, 2007, 02:59 AM Great shots. The biggest disadvantage of HDR is the noticeable degradation in quality. What lens did you use to take the last shot? Wide enough to capture so much of the skyline.
If you have a tripod and thusly properly aligned and bracketed shots, there should be no degradation. I did not have a tripod for these so that was a challenge - I propped the camera up against the glass and the window "sill" and edges as best as I could, as a form of support. It proved almost impossible - if not impossible - to get razor-sharp-aligned bracketed shots. So I think that's the "degradation" you're seeing on these. I used a 24-105 on most of these - at 24mm. Not particularly "wide" per se, but since it's with a full-frame camera, it looks wider than it would on a cropped sensor.
srika August 27th, 2007, 03:00 AM what did you use to get the shots? (since you cant use a tripod up there)
yeah that was tricky.. see above.
srika August 27th, 2007, 03:03 AM I color corrected a few of these - I think they look better:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1424/1232154884_f58bc1ce78_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1386/1232239912_c7e222dbee_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1098/1235312741_2574c32ed7_o.jpg
and here's another one, looking west - kinda fuzzy on the left and right - no tripod:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1149/1229668242_40c052dde6_o.jpg
cbotnyse August 27th, 2007, 03:09 AM thats amazing for no tripod....do you recall the settings?
srika August 27th, 2007, 06:09 AM ISO 100, f/4.0 - and obviously exposure varied.. if you want to know any other settings just ask!
if I had a faster lens I think I'd have better luck too..
srika August 27th, 2007, 09:13 AM http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1278/1246335985_3f2eb17a08_o.jpg
srika August 27th, 2007, 09:41 AM I had more usable shots than I had thought...
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1257/1246469587_5b94142127_o.jpg
Chicagophotoshop August 27th, 2007, 03:26 PM good job dude. can you post the 3 different exposures (maybe of your best one?) and the photomatrix settings you used? I have bene trying these too and cant see to get it right. the tone mapping is where I get stuck
srika August 28th, 2007, 05:26 AM Hey - I'll post the exposures tomorrow.. my laptop is at work. I'll also post screenshots of the photomatix settings.
|
|