Matthias Offodile
November 2nd, 2007, 08:39 PM
Madison has big plans for Africa
Nick Wilson
LISTED property asset manager Madison Property Fund Managers is planning large-scale property projects in Angola in particular and Namibia.
These are in the main mixed-use developments including retail, residential, offices and industrial property, as well as hotel opportunities.
The company is also “assessing” opportunities in Nigeria and Ghana. But Mike Flax, an executive director of Madison who was speaking to delegates at the 2007 Retail Real Estate World Summit at the Cape Town International Convention Centre yesterday, said that while there were “great opportunities in Africa in terms of extracting high returns” there was also a “myriad of risks”.
Flax said the “main hurdle” for companies trying to do business in other parts of Africa, excluding countries such as SA, Botswana, Namibia and Mauritius, was “getting security of tenure”. He said there were sometimes no deeds offices where properties could be registered.
A second risk was corruption, which “pushes up the cost of doing business in Africa and is contrary to the rules, ethics and corporate governance that SA listed companies and international companies” abide by.
“There is a perception that property development is a gold mine that all government officials feel they have a right to tap into. Everyone is asking for handouts, a percentage of equity payments, to release building materials.”
A lack of infrastructure in certain African countries was also a big problem. In some countries finding a hotel room or getting a flight was challenging.
But he said African countries needed “pioneers to go in there and build up the real estate and infrastructure”.
Flax said that, fortunately, the Chinese were already providing a lot of infrastructure in African countries in terms of barter deals where they built roads and necessary infrastructure in exchange for obtaining mining and oil rights. “China is putting in the infrastructural backbone.”
He said Africa was the forgotten continent and that often the great gains made by SA and other countries were ignored by international financial news reports.
Two issues largely ignored were the excellent returns South African real estate had produced, and that more than 40% of African countries were showing GDP growth of more than 7% this year.
Flax said Angola, for instance, would this year show GDP growth of more than 20%.
He said China, in terms of its barter agreements, was “colonising parts of Africa by stealth”.
“The Chinese are in Africa. They may not be exploiting real estate opportunities, they are there for commodities.”
In terms of Madison’s involvement in other parts of Africa, Flax said the important feature was to have local partners it could trust.
“These are people with access to government, although governments do change and you can’t bank on their government contacts. You bank on their expertise, which is more important.”
PS: I particularly like the sentence:"The Chinese are in Africa. They may not be exploiting real estate opportunities, they are there for commodities.”:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: What a joke? This guy certainly is completly unaware of the Chinese tactics and strategy! China´s involvement is long-termWell, let him continue to dream...as long as he brings in the real estate projects!
Nick Wilson
LISTED property asset manager Madison Property Fund Managers is planning large-scale property projects in Angola in particular and Namibia.
These are in the main mixed-use developments including retail, residential, offices and industrial property, as well as hotel opportunities.
The company is also “assessing” opportunities in Nigeria and Ghana. But Mike Flax, an executive director of Madison who was speaking to delegates at the 2007 Retail Real Estate World Summit at the Cape Town International Convention Centre yesterday, said that while there were “great opportunities in Africa in terms of extracting high returns” there was also a “myriad of risks”.
Flax said the “main hurdle” for companies trying to do business in other parts of Africa, excluding countries such as SA, Botswana, Namibia and Mauritius, was “getting security of tenure”. He said there were sometimes no deeds offices where properties could be registered.
A second risk was corruption, which “pushes up the cost of doing business in Africa and is contrary to the rules, ethics and corporate governance that SA listed companies and international companies” abide by.
“There is a perception that property development is a gold mine that all government officials feel they have a right to tap into. Everyone is asking for handouts, a percentage of equity payments, to release building materials.”
A lack of infrastructure in certain African countries was also a big problem. In some countries finding a hotel room or getting a flight was challenging.
But he said African countries needed “pioneers to go in there and build up the real estate and infrastructure”.
Flax said that, fortunately, the Chinese were already providing a lot of infrastructure in African countries in terms of barter deals where they built roads and necessary infrastructure in exchange for obtaining mining and oil rights. “China is putting in the infrastructural backbone.”
He said Africa was the forgotten continent and that often the great gains made by SA and other countries were ignored by international financial news reports.
Two issues largely ignored were the excellent returns South African real estate had produced, and that more than 40% of African countries were showing GDP growth of more than 7% this year.
Flax said Angola, for instance, would this year show GDP growth of more than 20%.
He said China, in terms of its barter agreements, was “colonising parts of Africa by stealth”.
“The Chinese are in Africa. They may not be exploiting real estate opportunities, they are there for commodities.”
In terms of Madison’s involvement in other parts of Africa, Flax said the important feature was to have local partners it could trust.
“These are people with access to government, although governments do change and you can’t bank on their government contacts. You bank on their expertise, which is more important.”
PS: I particularly like the sentence:"The Chinese are in Africa. They may not be exploiting real estate opportunities, they are there for commodities.”:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: What a joke? This guy certainly is completly unaware of the Chinese tactics and strategy! China´s involvement is long-termWell, let him continue to dream...as long as he brings in the real estate projects!