View Full Version : Owner says zoning curfew crimps his cafe


Quegiebo
November 9th, 2007, 06:39 AM
Owner says zoning curfew crimps his cafe

Strings n' Rings' wet zoning requires it to close at 8 p.m. most days.

By BRENDAN WATSON, Times Staff Writer

Published November 9, 2007

Want to have dinner at Strings n' Rings? You better hurry most weekdays. The cafe is only open until 8 p.m. Mondays through Thursdays.

Owner Alan Smolar said it's ridiculous, but it's the law - and it only applies to him.

Surrounding businesses on this restaurant row in SoHo are open until 11 p.m. or later. Just up the street at 208 S Howard Ave., Mangroves Bar and Grill serves food until 2 a.m.

"It's not like I am running some topless bar or something illicit," complained Smolar. "It's a cafe."

Smolar wants to stay open later on weekdays to catch the dinner crowd. On a recent Thursday he says he turned away 14 customers shortly after 8 p.m. He is also restricted from opening at all on Sundays, when he'd like to serve a brunch menu. He could stay open until 1 a.m., Fridays and Saturdays, but closes at 10 p.m. when he says customers gravitate toward bars and restaurants that serve liquor. He serves only beer and wine.

The restricted hours were incorporated into the building's wet-zoning permit, which is granted by the City Council and allows restaurants to serve alcohol.

Smolar said the restrictions have cost him $50,000 to $60,000 in additional revenue since he opened in July 2006. His restaurant is in the red and in danger of closing as a result, he said.

The city forces all restaurants to close by 3 a.m. But further restrictions are rare, according to Gloria Moreda, manager of the city's Land Development Coordination office. The City Council doesn't have the authority to shorten a restaurant's hours. Such restrictions can only be suggested by the individual seeking wet zoning. In this case, that person was Kathy Wiley, who owned the previous restaurant at 223 S Howard.

Wiley's wet-zoning permit had lapsed, and part of the sale agreement with Smolar was that she would reapply.

She did, but Smolar couldn't attend the hearing in April 2006. He was running another Strings n' Rings restaurant on Himes Avenue in Carrollwood. He thought the wet-zoning application was a simple procedure.

But parking on Howard is becoming a major headache for surrounding homeowners, according to Walter Crumbley of the Courier City/Oscawana Neighborhood Association who spoke to the City Council.

No one at that hearing objected to Smolar's restaurant. But Crumbley was concerned that it only had 21 parking spots.

Also, he pointed out, wet zoning does not apply to a particular restaurant, but to the building. So if Smolar's restaurant folded, another business that doesn't share his interest in being a quiet neighborhood cafe could open under the existing zoning.

At that hearing last year, Wiley told council members that her restaurant was primarily a lunch and early-dinner spot, and she was sure that Smolar's would be also.

During a recess in the meeting, council member John Dingfelder asked Wiley to verify Smolar's hours and to suggest restrictions as part of the wet zoning application.

Wiley called Smolar during the hearing and asked for his hours, but didn't say why. He casually threw out some abbreviated times he planned to open as the business got off the ground.

Just a few days before opening the restaurant, Smolar learned about the restrictions.

"It felt like someone had hit me in the chest with a 2-by-4. I couldn't believe it," he said.

Now, Moreda said, Smolar's only option for lifting the restrictions is to reapply for wet zoning.

Crumbley said Smolar has been a great neighbor, even hosting an association meeting. He wouldn't have any objections if Smolar reapplied.

But Smolar said that he can't afford to pay the $1,115 application fee with no guarantees of the outcome. Plus, he would have to wait three months for another City Council hearing.

"Every dollar I have right now goes into keeping the restaurant afloat," he said.

His only encouragement is that customers seem to like his burgers, wraps and onion rings. But the business is struggling. He put $300,000 into the new business and isn't sure how long he'll survive without the added business that might come with later hours.

His Carrollwood location has already closed because, Smolar said, he couldn't find the right management to run both locations.

"If I have to close, it will break my heart," he said. "It's the only mistress my wife will ever let me have."

Brendan Watson can be reached at bwatson@sptimes.com or 226-3302.

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/11/09/Citytimes/Owner_says_zoning_cur.shtml

jonknee
November 9th, 2007, 04:01 PM
I agree that it's ridiculous. Good luck to them.

FLHawk
November 9th, 2007, 07:25 PM
Feel bad for the guy, but it doesn't sound like he's a very good businessman. I think I would have done whatever it took to insure that I was wet zoned, and not left it up to a prior owner.

jonknee
November 9th, 2007, 07:38 PM
^ Definitely. The whole wet zoning thing is a mess though. A scam.

Quegiebo
November 27th, 2007, 11:17 PM
Forces combine to close restaurant

Zoning that led to early hours and a weak economy finished off Strings n' Rings, the owner says.

By BRENDAN WATSON, Times Staff Writer

Published November 23, 2007

Owner Alan Smolar had been getting by on a string for a long time, but it finally ran out Nov. 14, the night Strings n' Rings restaurant closed its doors for good.

"Emotionally draining, it's tough. That was the love of my life," said Smolar. "But I just couldn't keep it going."

City Times chronicled his difficulties in a story Nov. 9. A misunderstanding regarding his wet zoning application resulted in Smolar having to close the restaurant at 8 p.m. most weekdays, while surrounding businesses stayed open much longer.

Smolar estimated that he lost between $50,000 and $60,000 in business as a result. But that wasn't what did him in, he said this week.

The last month or so has been especially tough with even fewer people dining on his onion rings, sandwiches and salads. He attributes the downturn to a lackluster economy and says people just aren't eating out as much.

The lost revenue from closing early might have pulled him through this rough time, he said.

Smolar said he's done in this city.

"I wouldn't recommend that anyone move to this town to open up a restaurant," he said, although he holds out hope that he might have a future as a restaurateur elsewhere.

For now, Smolar said, "I'm just trying to get my head together. That's all I am trying to do."

What will replace his restaurant at 223 S Howard remains unclear.

[Last modified November 21, 2007, 08:05:12]

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/11/23/Citytimes/Forces_combine_to_clo.shtml

Whore of a city©
November 28th, 2007, 05:45 AM
I ate there a couple of times. He seemed like a nice guy and the food was decent. He actually mentioned this zoning issue and how much he wanted out of Tampa back in July-August. It is sad that the city is willing to do this to people who put up money to open a business.

jonknee
November 28th, 2007, 05:47 AM
I feel bad but this guy definitely didn't have his shit together.

Quegiebo
November 28th, 2007, 08:51 PM
It appears that Alan Smolar didn't have it together, no doubt. But I still can't help but be disappointed in local govt. for failing to make a positive difference. This wasn't rocket science. :(

There's a saying, "Leadership is action, not position." In this instance, they certainly didn't lead! They had two options in front of them: address his concerns and act to keep him in business (if they actually cared), or they could just dismiss his costly misstep/dilemma and play penalty referee. Unfortunately, they chose the latter and he's now out of business.

Bottom line - with an ever-increasing need to secure addional revenue, they've (and I use the next word loosely) managed to ensure less tax dollars from yet another business.

I thought our leaders were paid to support and represent? ... naïve of me, huh? ;)