View Full Version : Toronto's year of living large – and tall


Elkhanan1
December 30th, 2007, 04:36 PM
http://www.thestar.com/columnists/article/289358

Toronto's year of living large – and tall

Love it or hate it, the ROM Crystal signalled the return of ambition to our architectural stage

Dec 29, 2007 04:30 AM

Christopher Hume
Urban Affairs Columnist

If nothing else, 2007 was the year Toronto's Cultural Renaissance hit its stride. The main event was the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum's Michael Lee-Chin Crystal. Designed by New York-based architect Daniel Libeskind, the $400-million addition offended many, pleased a few, but in either case, it raised the stakes hugely. This isn't a city given to risk-taking, but what's often overlooked is that Libeskind's radical remake of the ROM addresses the urban condition as much as institutional revitalization. The result is a building that has reconnected with the city, and that's fully a part of the urban scene.

"It's a building that invites experimentation," says ROM CEO and president William Thorsell. "But it's also one that fully engages the city."

Just across the road from the ROM, the compact Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art found new life as the jewel in Toronto's cultural crown. Redesigned by KPMB, this is the urban project par excellence, filled with exhilarating spaces and exquisitely integrated, it could serve as a model for everything that follows.

On the other hand, the much-delayed Metropolis at the northeast corner of Yonge and Dundas turned out to be a dud.

Though it forms one edge of the square, and occupies land on a major downtown intersection, it seems oblivious to anything beyond its own banality.

Further north, the city's love affair with the condo tower reached new heights; a tower at Yonge and Bloor will stand 80 storeys tall and a second, at Yonge and Gerrard, 75 storeys.

Though neither tower could be described as architecturally exciting, both are presentable. At the same time, however, most development happened in the vacuum that passes for planning in Toronto.

Think of West Queen West, which was "salvaged" at the last minute after the city had lost at the Ontario Municipal Board, the de facto city planner.

The final irony was Pier 27, the condo launched at the foot of Yonge St. on the water's edge. Designed by Peter Clewes of architectsAlliance, it will be one of the most interesting residential projects ever built in Toronto.

The problem is that it should have been anywhere but here, prime waterfront land that calls out to be part of the public realm.

Taller, Better
December 30th, 2007, 05:54 PM
Well written article by the Fume.

DrT
December 31st, 2007, 02:25 AM
On the other hand, the much-delayed Metropolis at the northeast corner of Yonge and Dundas turned out to be a dud.

"A dud" :lol:
Gezz, it's not even finished yet.
Yes, another masterpiece of pontification by the Fume.

Jaye101
December 31st, 2007, 04:13 AM
The article seems unfinished, much more could have been included.

vancouverite/to'er
December 31st, 2007, 06:38 AM
Great article!

KGB
December 31st, 2007, 07:23 AM
"A dud" Gezz, it's not even finished yet.
Yes, another masterpiece of pontification by the Fume.


Normally, I would agree with your sentiments. But in this case, we really don't need to see that project any further finished to safely proclaim it a dud as far as architecture or content goes.




KGB

sumisu
January 3rd, 2008, 03:56 AM
"A dud" :lol:
Gezz, it's not even finished yet.
Yes, another masterpiece of pontification by the Fume.


It's totally a dud. worst building ever.

Mollywood
January 3rd, 2008, 04:53 AM
It's totally a dud. worst building ever.

I think calling it a "dud" is an understatement. Hume was being kind. lol:ohno:

Elkhanan1
January 3rd, 2008, 10:08 AM
I'm sure duds everywhere are deeply offended by the comparison to TLS. I smell a lawsuit.

Taller, Better
January 3rd, 2008, 06:52 PM
I ate some chocolate Milk Duds not that long ago.. I wonder if they resented the comparison! :D

caltrane74
January 3rd, 2008, 07:12 PM
It's totally a dud. worst building ever.

The building was not the point of the Metropolis. It was always about the advertising signage that would be affixed to the exterior. What sense does it make to design a masterpiece only to have it covered in Billboards and LED??



Looking at it in that context can hardly be seen as failure.

I think calling it a "dud" is an understatement. Hume was being kind. lol:ohno:

He may have being overly kind, if your looking at a building which currently has only 1 tenant. I'll save my judgement regarding this project until the Movie Theatre opens up and we have some context to view the totality of the project.

Taller, Better
January 3rd, 2008, 07:14 PM
You have a point, Caltrane. From the vantage point of the square, the signage is very effective and completes the overall "effect" of the Square.

caltrane74
January 3rd, 2008, 07:16 PM
Very true Taller, When walking up Yonge Street the question becomes:

Are you in Toronto or Tokyo?

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2046/2051988504_1ce74055b8.jpg?v=0



Taller you took this picture eh?

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j251/dawnd_01/Autumn%202007/7fa7469b.jpg

sumisu
January 3rd, 2008, 07:33 PM
well having had to wait 10 plus years for something to happen on that spot, the results most definitely fall into the dud category.

caltrane74
January 3rd, 2008, 07:38 PM
well having had to wait 10 plus years for something to happen on that spot, the results most definitely fall into the dud category.

No one will argue, that the building took an extremely long time to complete.

sumisu
January 3rd, 2008, 08:34 PM
well 10 years would give them some time to think of something decent, nay?

Taller, Better
January 3rd, 2008, 09:18 PM
But it is up now. Yes, that was my pic, Caltrane! :)

fdl1313
January 3rd, 2008, 10:33 PM
I have to agree with the dud camp. The early renderings looked alot nicer, for some reason. Not sure what the difference is exactly and I'm too lazy to compare photos:)

Transportfan
January 4th, 2008, 09:06 AM
^^ The difference is that on the real thing the ads are cheap.