View Full Version : Act Tower l HAMAMATSU l 215m l 45fl
RafflesCity
August 28th, 2003, 01:35 AM
Act Tower
Hamamatsu, Japan
HEIGHT: 215m/706 feet
FLOORS: 45 floors
COMPLETION: 1994
ARCHITECT: Mitsubishi Estate Co./ Nihon Sekkei
ACT City Hamamatsu, an ambitious project conceived as a model urban development for the 21st century where music and culture can flourish side by side with industry and technology, opened last October in Hamamatsu, 250 kilometers southwest of Tokyo. Jointly developed by local government authorities and private investors, the 4.3-hectare complex includes a high-rise office and hotel tower, a five-story civic center with two state-of-the-art concert/convention halls, an exhibition/event space and a musical instrument museum.
The centerpiece of ACT City is ACT Tower, a 45-story office building and luxury hotel developed by the city of Hamamatsu, The Dai-Ichi Mutual Life Insurance Co. and Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. The 212m-high steel frame and steel frame-reinforced concrete building provides 150,978m2 of floor space as well as the latest in intelligent building systems and amenities. A 324-room world-class convention hotel, the Okura ACT City Hotel Hamamatsu, occupies part of the building between the first and fifth floors as well as floors 29 through 44. Office space, equipped with a card-type security system and energy efficient air conditioning, extends from the ninth through the 27th floors.
The elliptically shaped tower was specially designed to minimize wind resistance. A supertruss was utilized for constructing the set-back upper portion of the tower, whose pillars are positioned differently from those of the lower portion. The structure's complex form posed considerable construction challenges, especially in regard to steel framing work and installation of curved facing materials. In addition to heading up the joint venture responsible for construction, Kajima collaborated with Nihon Sekkei Inc., Mitsubishi Estate, Shimizu and Takenaka on the design.
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/photopost/data/3140/103act.jpg
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/rotpics02/acttower.jpeg
http://www.nihonsekkei.co.jp/works/data/img/actcity1.jpg
http://www.kajima.co.jp/topics/perspect/vol_15_2/multiuse/image/pr15s-09.gif
http://www.act-okura.co.jp/img/top_img_e.jpg
New Jack City
August 28th, 2003, 01:58 AM
7/10...The side view looks OK, but not the front. The bottom portion is too big and wide, though it is something different. The simple facade goes very well too.
The Messiah
August 28th, 2003, 02:06 AM
Yeah,this is not the best design.It's decent...in a way :D
7.0/10
SteelCity32
August 28th, 2003, 02:41 AM
I like this design...8/10
Muse
August 28th, 2003, 09:05 AM
Looks so diferent in reality, the rendeings and the computer graphic.
On going by the 1st pic post, nice curves and typically small windows.
7.5 from me :)
AtlanticaC5
August 28th, 2003, 03:03 PM
7/10, not so very good, but it looks OK.
RafflesCity
August 28th, 2003, 05:19 PM
7.5/10
I like the shape and simplicity of facade and window design.
That thing on top spoils it though.
SUNNI
August 29th, 2003, 10:12 AM
i like i like:yes:
9/10
HKguy
August 30th, 2003, 08:06 AM
dull............
5/10
renell
August 30th, 2003, 11:11 AM
6/10 not interesting.
DamienK
August 30th, 2003, 02:07 PM
7/10
Wu-Gambino
August 30th, 2003, 02:47 PM
5.5/10
Winus
September 2nd, 2003, 04:49 PM
There something wrong with the proportions. 6.0
Patrick
September 5th, 2003, 07:13 AM
ok 7,5
BGT
September 18th, 2003, 03:36 AM
4.5/10
SeeMacau
September 18th, 2003, 03:46 PM
I like it
8/10
airsickpenthousedweller
October 2nd, 2003, 11:58 AM
A design you have to get used to, I guess. I tend to not like it very much, though.
6.5/10
baqthier
November 1st, 2003, 07:36 AM
Nice but can be a bit boring. 6.5/10
Fabio
November 8th, 2003, 08:39 PM
8/10
Nice tower
alex3000
December 23rd, 2003, 05:08 AM
6/10
TYW
December 26th, 2003, 12:12 PM
7/10
dun like the bottom
MCC
December 27th, 2003, 07:22 PM
4/10
james2390
January 3rd, 2004, 09:49 AM
that ufo on top ruins it, 4
Jo
January 21st, 2004, 05:56 AM
7/10
Some buildings look so empty on photos. This is one of them and I don't like that.
The curved facade is nice but I don't like the setback that cuts through the middle of the building, giving it that pear shape. Also the thing on the top should have the same shape as the rest of the building.
Imperfect Ending
January 21st, 2004, 09:28 AM
6
Interesting design but not to my interest..
7 World Trade
July 13th, 2004, 09:17 PM
looks bad close up, but from far away it's ok. gotta make this building less dull. they should clad it with more glass to make it look more like the lipstick building. then it'll be interesting.
6.5
Sitol447
November 2nd, 2004, 08:21 PM
8,5/10 - I like it!
Þróndeimr
November 3rd, 2004, 06:11 PM
Too simply, 6.5/10
empersouf
November 3rd, 2004, 06:15 PM
8.0, shouldn't be so fat.
Monkey
November 13th, 2004, 10:45 PM
The bottom half is out of proportion with the top half, and what the hell is that structure on the roof?
A bad design in my opinion.
4.5
andysimo123
November 25th, 2004, 11:11 PM
7/10
Taufiq
January 4th, 2005, 04:34 PM
5/10 Really don't like the shape
MattSal
March 31st, 2005, 05:55 AM
Mediocre at best. I give it a 5/10. :no:
Medo
April 9th, 2005, 04:14 PM
nice 7
Trances
April 10th, 2005, 02:42 AM
curved and sleek
i realy like appaers to be almost beveled
8/10
Latoso
June 2nd, 2005, 08:56 AM
6.5/10
Reflex
June 2nd, 2005, 10:33 PM
Don't really know why, but I like it...:) 7.5
Jules
June 10th, 2005, 03:15 AM
8.5.
DRAKKO
July 2nd, 2005, 11:08 PM
9/10
FJP
July 7th, 2005, 01:47 AM
6.5/10
CborG
July 23rd, 2005, 02:37 PM
6.5/10
El_Greco
August 10th, 2005, 02:07 AM
7/10
SoboleuS
August 10th, 2005, 10:31 AM
It's quite interesting. I like the shape. 7,5/10
Xoceelias
September 5th, 2005, 06:58 AM
8/10
marpa
September 7th, 2005, 10:49 PM
There something wrong with the proportions.
5,5/10
jesarm
September 14th, 2005, 02:33 AM
ugly 5/10
www.sercan.de
November 4th, 2005, 09:25 PM
7,5/10
Blue_Sky
November 4th, 2005, 09:45 PM
6/10
Sinjin P.
November 24th, 2005, 01:14 PM
6.5/10 uninteresting
forvine
December 6th, 2005, 05:44 AM
6.5/10
Principes
December 6th, 2005, 05:47 AM
:sleepy: NEIN 6/10.
Scruffy88
January 3rd, 2006, 04:43 AM
Holy Fat Building!
5/10
skipperBill
March 7th, 2006, 03:51 AM
7.5/10.
Skyman
May 7th, 2006, 06:03 PM
7/10
LAYZIEDOGG
May 22nd, 2006, 05:06 PM
no dont like it 5/10
anakin
June 7th, 2006, 09:24 AM
5/10
clarky
June 7th, 2006, 08:52 PM
8/10
Xoceelias
June 8th, 2006, 01:02 AM
5/10
ZZ-II
June 15th, 2006, 08:01 PM
it's ok
8/10
gutooo
July 17th, 2006, 01:23 AM
7/10
Dreamlıneя
August 4th, 2006, 03:44 AM
7/10
Mosaic
September 5th, 2006, 09:47 AM
7/10
B@dGuYoM
September 8th, 2006, 05:01 PM
6/10
mtt16
October 10th, 2006, 07:23 AM
7/10
(((myx)))
November 5th, 2006, 01:39 PM
8.5 is it really shiny?
Chinky Orz
November 19th, 2006, 06:54 PM
7.5/10 Looks alright.
vincent young
December 30th, 2006, 03:40 PM
4.5/10
The structure on the top looks totally out of place. The building itself looks boring.
Top Gear
February 7th, 2007, 06:15 AM
6/10
Piotr-Stettin
February 14th, 2007, 03:44 AM
8/10
W!CKED
April 9th, 2007, 09:39 AM
7/10
Aliya
June 20th, 2007, 07:54 PM
6.5/10
LMCA1990
September 2nd, 2007, 05:25 AM
8/10
Jim856796
September 3rd, 2007, 08:47 AM
7.5/10
Astralis
September 27th, 2007, 12:03 PM
8/10
MasonicStage™
September 30th, 2007, 11:37 AM
8/10
RON-E
October 1st, 2007, 08:26 AM
4/10
Henk
October 2nd, 2007, 08:40 AM
6/10.
kon133
January 2nd, 2008, 04:44 PM
3/10
TallBox
January 2nd, 2008, 11:10 PM
i like the rounded curves bt dislike the execution 6.5/10
Pengui
January 16th, 2008, 02:48 PM
The repetitive facade allied with the slightly curved shape give it a disturbing look of something half organic, half robotic. Maybe the fleshy colour of the cladding points into that direction too. Yuck.
3.5/10
kamil.bukowski
January 18th, 2008, 10:20 PM
6/10
incognito_rn
January 21st, 2008, 02:46 AM
shampoo bottle.
Halabalooza
February 25th, 2008, 05:48 AM
6. not 2 bad
Hornplayer
April 8th, 2008, 02:02 AM
I've actually stayed in this building. The bottom fatter section is offices I believe. The top thinner part is a hotel. When inside the hotel (which if memory serves, starts on around the 30th floor) you can look up a vast atrium right up to the roof. As it's the tallest building for a very long way around, it really sticks out above everything else and the views are great. There's a great observation lift to the top which provides impressive if not stomach churning views.
I agree that it's not the most beautiful building in the world but looks much better in the flesh than in pictures. Unfortunately all my photos of my stay are analogue and I currently don't have access to a scanner.
I'd give it an 8/10
Fundador
April 11th, 2008, 09:49 AM
7/10 :)
Nielsiej13
April 11th, 2008, 02:01 PM
5/10
WAuzzie
April 12th, 2008, 06:08 PM
4/10
Machone
June 19th, 2008, 11:07 PM
To massive in my opinion, dull architecture. 5/10
meds
June 21st, 2008, 06:50 PM
5.5/10
krzewi
September 16th, 2008, 02:34 PM
1/10
Rutger1991
September 18th, 2008, 06:22 PM
7.5/10 ^^
stasiua
September 18th, 2008, 08:56 PM
7/10
Kawasaki_Kragujevac
October 20th, 2008, 11:44 PM
7.5/10
Malbo
October 23rd, 2008, 04:36 PM
6/10
briker
November 6th, 2008, 12:31 PM
6.5
Fred_
December 12th, 2008, 12:59 PM
08/10
Densetsu
December 14th, 2008, 03:34 PM
5.5/10
ZZ-II
December 14th, 2008, 06:37 PM
thread moved to Asia & Australia Section :)
weblogUpdates.ping
SkyscraperCity - Powered by vBulletin
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.