View Full Version : Texas falls to 5th for corporate moves in magazine survey


Dallasbrink
March 4th, 2008, 05:54 AM
Texas falls to 5th for corporate moves in magazine survey
02:23 PM CST on Monday, March 3, 2008

By BRENDAN M. CASE / The Dallas Morning News
Texas dropped to fifth place in the 2007 ranking of the states with the most new and expanded corporate facilities, three rungs below its second-place finish the year before, Site Selection magazine said Monday.

Ohio placed first among the states, winning its second straight Site Selection Governor’s Cup. Texas finished first in 2004 and 2005.

Among metropolitan areas, Dallas-Fort Worth also stumbled, ending up tied for sixth place with Nashville, Tenn., after finishing fourth the year before.

Chicago topped the list of metropolitan areas, while Houston finished fourth.

“Ohio’s second consecutive Governor’s Cup win proves that traditionally industrial states can attract more new facilities and new corporate investment than states that have transitioned to service economies when the whole package is considered,” said Mark Arend, editor in chief of Site Selection, which covers the corporate expansion and relocation business.

Site Selection’s annual rankings are determined by which states and cities attracted the most business projects that satisfy at least one of three criteria. The projects must include an investment of at least $1 million, create at least 50 new jobs or involve construction of at least 20,000 square feet, Mr. Arend said.

Projects by government, non-profits or other non-business entities don’t count.

The rankings are not meant as an assessment of local business climate or quality of life.

Top 10 States in the 2007 Site Selection Governor's Cup
Ohio

Illinois

Tennessee

North Carolina

Texas

New York

Michigan

Virginia

Florida

Kentucky

Source: Site Selection




I CALL BS!

SRG
March 4th, 2008, 05:56 AM
Yeah.

Nope. Ohio is not #1 for uhh corporate relocations. LOL!

Dallasbrink
March 4th, 2008, 06:04 AM
Im not arguing that Texas should be one, but I doubt Ohio is one if im hearing about them having problems like Michigan on the News all the time.

SRG
March 4th, 2008, 06:05 AM
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah. I really just don't think so.

Dallasbrink
March 4th, 2008, 06:08 AM
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah. I really just don't think so.

agreeing with me or disagreeing with me, im not sure.

Beaumonter
March 4th, 2008, 06:18 AM
Yeah I think this is misleading

SRG
March 4th, 2008, 06:20 AM
agreeing with me or disagreeing with me, im not sure.

I agree with you, this study is bunk. :)

Dallasbrink
March 4th, 2008, 07:05 AM
ok, YES, people agree with me. If Michigan is on that list, then it has to be crap

Geaux Tigers
March 4th, 2008, 02:37 PM
Yeah, I'm pretty sure corporations aren't stumbling over themselves to relocate to Michigan and Ohio.

Velvetj
March 4th, 2008, 09:19 PM
I'm actually surprised to not see Georgia on the list.

Trae
March 4th, 2008, 10:29 PM
Aside from Atlanta, not many companies are relocating to Georgia.

SRG
March 6th, 2008, 03:52 AM
Atlanta is considerably bigger than even some states in the south.

Dallasbrink
March 7th, 2008, 12:42 AM
I figured Georgia would be on there ahead of Michigan.

g-man430
March 7th, 2008, 12:52 AM
Another biased report. There will be a new one out next week that list different cities then the week after that and so on. :yes: