How would you rate the WTC proposal "glass tower"?

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2002/wtc.ideas/designs/page.7/15.jpg

It is my personal favorite out of all the buildings proposed.

mmmmmmmm

3 or less....
what the h*ll is that?

I like the fact that it dictates the idea of the old WTC, but no. Yuck.

4/10

7.5

I do like the cross-bracing structural elements which are visible. Looks classy in glass, but unoriginal.

7.5/10

8/10

Hehe....it's hard to judge.Well alright,just for being nice i give it 6.5/10

It's a lame answer to a serious situation.

4/10

Looks like the same as the old World Trade Center

7/10

Pésimo....

i would prefer the Liebeskind's proposal.

1/10

It looks crappy and boring :sleepy: Fortunatelly it won't be built ;) 3/10

I like it when people say the new designs for the new WTC don't give the feeling of the old ones but when elegant, glass towers that are much taller and larger than the original ones and even mimic them too, everyone says they are plain and unimaginative! I like them a lot. Much better than Libeskind's and Childs'!

3/10 whats the meaning to build something that looks exactly like the one destroyed

Originally posted by GreatSky

How would you rate the WTC proposal "glass tower"?


dunno man. not that great. it';s a start but you need something unbelievably amazing there. like world's best tower for several generations to come... if not best, then something really inspiring and amazing for da future!

5/10


:ohno:

very very very bad 0/10,

fill in the empty space on top with floors darn it!

at least this thing is 4 times better than libeskind/child's folly...

6

fill in the empty space on top with floors darn it!

at least this thing is 4 times better than libeskind/child's folly...

6
Yeah, it looks alot better than the one they are building. I actually like this one. 8.5/10

looks like the old towers with a glassfacade instead of concrete or whatever it was before but yeah , looks quite boring give it a 4.5

4.5/10

6/10

6/10

Omg its ugly. 2/10

TI KONG..... This is so ugly... 1/10

YIKES!!!! :nuts:

On a scale of 1-10, I give this design a flat zero!

sorry don't like... 3/10

not nice... 3.5/10

5/10 :|

It would b nice to see some more twins going back.....but im not sure of that design....glass would be great but i see a little to much steel....Hell juss rebuild the old one I say! ! ! !

7/10.

Very bland..

The original Towers had a very strong facade with simple soaring vertical columns. Rebuilding to this design combined with a stronger internal structure would replace the missing piece of New York's heart. It would state clearly that we will prevail. RIP those lost 9/11/01

it's ok 7/10

umm...3/10 :fiddle:

7/10

7/10

6/10. I like the fact that there trying to re-create what once stood there. Prefer the old WTC towers though although the proposed ones would still have fit in well with the surrounding buildings.

3/10 :puke:

I don't believe this section is for proposals :ohno:.. but 8/10

:redx:

:redx:

3.5/10.

I don`t see anything (no picture)...
How should I rate therefore a building, with a 1...?:ohno:

8/10

5/10

6.5/10

3/10

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/images/smilies/redxdance.gif:ohno:

5/10

4/10

9/10