View Full Version : Two Towers planned over Central Station


habsfan
April 3rd, 2008, 04:32 PM
Here's an article I found in the Gazette (April 2nd 2008)

It's about the project Homburg wants to build in downtown Montreal. The Plan calls for 2 - 25 storey towers. one would be for office space, the other for Condos.

I have to say i'm a little disappointed by this projects lack of height.(again!)

It's smack in the middle of the financial core, and once again, we'll be stuck with 2 stubby little towers.

Promotors in this town are chicken. Nobody wants to take a chance with ONE 50 storey tower instead of 2 25 storey towers. I understand the risk factor is much much lower when you build two shorter towers, but it's not like we're looking at a section of the city that isn't very "tall". The people living in these condo's won't have much of a view looking north or east. That's why I think had they built a 40 or 50 storey tower, it could have been more interesting for the "codo" portion of the tower. People would at least have impressive views of the city from their condos!

ANyways,

here's the article!

Two office towers planned
Homburg builds above cn station. Also launches new phase of condo project
ROBERT GIBBENS, The Gazette
Published: Wednesday, April 02
Halifax property developer Richard Homburg said yesterday he plans to build two $150- million 24-storey office towers to maximize the potential of the CN Central Station complex he bought last year for $355 million.

Homburg, CEO of Homburg Invest Inc., was in Montreal to launch the $35-million Phase II of the 333 Sherbrooke St. E. luxury condominium project and lifted the veil slightly on plans for Central Station's long-term future.

Homburg Invest's commitment to Montreal has now risen to more than $1 billion over the past three years. It includes the $485-million acquisition of Alexis Nihon Plaza and two-thirds ownership of the historic Château Viger site in partnership with the de Gaspé Beaubien family.

Central Station, where Canadian National Railway Co. took back its 17-storey headquarters tower on a long-term lease, has an excellent location and development potential, said Homburg, both for retail and future office space. "We're talking with several companies and we'd probably start with one tower."

Construction of a direct rail link between downtown and Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport at Dorval, now being planned seriously, will make Central Station's location even more important, he added.

Phase I of 333 Sherbrooke E., which has helped to transform the landmark artery in the St. Denis St. and Plateau areas, is sold out and advance sales to buyers from Europe and the United States as well as Canada ensure success with the 67-unit Phase II, Homburg said.

A one-bedroom condo is priced around $350,000 and three-bedroom and top-level units are up to $2 million. Also, 30 townhouses will be built at the rear.

Alexis Nihon's retail space is doing well and will get an upgrade, he added, while the $400- million Viger station redevelopment, also being done with the de Gaspé Beaubiens, is moving steadily through the permitting process.

A recent report by the Office de consultation publique de Montréal said it was worthwhile and would rejuvenate the Faubourg Québec area, but could upset the neighbourhood's equilibrium. Viger would become a modern 250-room hotel and shopping centre. A massive underground parking area has stirred controversy.

Later, Homburg told the Montreal Real Estate Forum that Montreal property values lag

seriously behind the rest of Canada and this heightens the potential of a city with competitive business costs, a major container port, a rail transportation hub, fast-growing aerospace and high-tech industries and a strong tourism sector.

"The Montreal office market is on fire and downtown core vacancy rates have fallen sharply with little new space on the horizon," he said. "We see net rental rates responding accordingly while the condo market will continue to flourish for several more years."

Along with ownership of the Centre Laval and Spheretech, Homburg now holds 4.2 million square feet of prime retail and commercial properties in the greater Montreal area.

gibbens1@gmail.com


© The Gazette (Montreal) 2008

Taller, Better
April 3rd, 2008, 05:32 PM
That is a prestige location.. I hope they go high end luxury on the project; talk about an ideal location.

althegreat
April 3rd, 2008, 06:36 PM
talk about waste of real estate....I hope it never goes up.

But where's the space for those tower? Are they planning on destroying that god-awful elevated parking lot on la gauchetiere or even the 1940's station (more like a commie shoe box)?

habsfan
April 3rd, 2008, 09:53 PM
That is a prestige location.. I hope they go high end luxury on the project; talk about an ideal location.

It is supposed to be High end luxury for the Condo tower. Unfortunately it just wont be very "high".

But where's the space for those tower? Are they planning on destroying that god-awful elevated parking lot on la gauchetiere or even the 1940's station (more like a commie shoe box)?

My guess is that they'll be building this where the parking Lot is located.

trainrover
April 16th, 2008, 07:10 PM
I don't understand most o' you locals here, who keep clamouring for more height due to the region's aversion to maxi heights -- I mean, are your yearnings so hard on each of you that you might end up moving to some height-littered community instead one day?

althegreat
April 16th, 2008, 07:33 PM
I don't understand most o' you locals here, who keep clamouring for more height due to the region's aversion to maxi heights -- I mean, are your yearnings so hard on each of you that you might end up moving to some height-littered community instead one day?

what?

No, we like skyscrapers, hence our discussions about tall buildings and our 'yearnings' for tall buildings...I don't understand.

habsfan
April 16th, 2008, 08:21 PM
I don't understand most o' you locals here, who keep clamouring for more height due to the region's aversion to maxi heights -- I mean, are your yearnings so hard on each of you that you might end up moving to some height-littered community instead one day?

No, we like skyscrapers, hence our discussions about tall buildings and our 'yearnings' for tall buildings...I don't understand.

After all, the site is called SKYSCRAPERcity.com

If we can'T talk about skyscrapers and our fascination with them on this site, then where can we go??? Please, let me know!;):ohno:

MTLskyline
April 16th, 2008, 10:42 PM
I don't understand most o' you locals here, who keep clamouring for more height due to the region's aversion to maxi heights -- I mean, are your yearnings so hard on each of you that you might end up moving to some height-littered community instead one day?

Get with the program mate. :ohno:

GridSky
April 16th, 2008, 10:44 PM
Regardless, this is a good sign for Montreal.

Throw in Griffintown along with the two proposed 60 story towers along the peel Basin, and Montreal seems to be getting a pretty decent amount of developments again.

habsfan
April 17th, 2008, 01:04 AM
Regardless, this is a good sign for Montreal.

Throw in Griffintown along with the two proposed 60 story towers along the peel Basin, and Montreal seems to be getting a pretty decent amount of developments again.

Let's not forget the 33 storey 701 University, the 28 storey 900 de Maisonneuve, the 31 sotrey Place de la Cité international and the 25 storey Philips Square project!

Let's just hope that a couple of these projects do get built!

trainrover
April 17th, 2008, 07:22 PM
Get with the program mate. :ohno:
Right, being precisely what I was writing you! I disagree that the city`d either look or feel better were it to be swamped further by dull highrises -- yeah, just anudda cheezy progrum....cheesh, thanx!

The city`d become duller, especially were one to consider the glum scenery being fostered by some new Griffintown redevelopment feeding municipal agendas . . . yawn.

skyboi
April 17th, 2008, 08:04 PM
The only way to go is Up up up up not down or stand still ,let's life comes to full circle by itself

trainrover
April 21st, 2008, 07:43 PM
The only way to go is Up up up up not down or stand still
Try telling that to the slew! of merchants motioning their shopkeeping full throttle underground here . . . :ohno: . . . oh well....

Ya know, evidence of this city`s wish to develop on a lowrise Washington-DC'esque scale abound . . . for some crappy reason, the Great Depression from the 1930s caused the cityscape to start reaching (yawn) upward . . .