#069 l The Cullinan Towers l HONGKONG l 270m l 68fl

[ZZ-II]

The Cullinan Towers
Hongkong, China

HEIGHT: 270m/886 feet
FLOORS: 68 floors
COMPLETION: 2007
ARCHITECT: ?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/The_Cullinan.jpg/450px-The_Cullinan.jpg

http://www.globalphotos.org/hongkong/20070524/IMG_3702.jpg

http://www.globalphotos.org/hongkong/20071229/IMG_3794.jpg

i like them, 8.5/10 :)

[Ni3lS]

8/10 :) #66? Dubai is going to change the whole 1 - 100 section :) Btw ZZ-II --> Congrats :cheers: I think you deserve it :) you are always active and online ;)

[MDguy]

I think they're really attractive. Great facade up close, 9/10

[_00_deathscar]

"Modern classic" - simple but beautiful.

8/10

[Pengui]

I don't know why they didn't let another side of the towers face the bay. The huge glass wall fronting the bay gives it a bit of an unfriendly, stronghold feel, while another side has more setbacks and variety and is overall more engaging. I suppose the whole point was to have more bay views from the tower's apartments? Besides that, quality stuff.
7/10.

[Fundador]

8/10:)

[LeMoN-SK]

Simple shape but great facade. 8/10 too :)

[davee08]

8.5/10

[mbuildings]

9/10

[MasonicStage™]

6/10...nothing special.

[Mateus_]

6/10

[kon133]

7,5/10

[Cabman]

just a huge glass wall 5.5/10

[DamienK]

7.5/10

[W!CKED]

7/10

[RON-E]

6/10

[xever_7]

7/10

[Miguel_Prat]

7/10

[UNDECEIVED]

5/10

[Kawasaki KG]

8/10

[henry hill]

8/10

[Rutger1991]

6.5/10

[gladisimo]

7.5, they look far better up close than I've seen them from far away.

[LMCA1990]

8.5/10

[SacOnTheRise]

6.5 Boxy glassy towers, nothing new. At least up close although repetitive in design it looks nice.

[Astralis]

7/10

[snail456]

8.5/10

Like the cladding a lot but a bit busy otherwise.

[briker]

8.

[Inconfidente]

07/10

[LAYZIEDOGG]

8/10 nice glass

[IMPRESARIO]

6/10...nothing special.

[Slodi]

nice glassy towers 8/10

[SilentStrike]

nice!! 8.5/10

[Malbo]

7/10

[Conrado]

7,5

[Densetsu]

They look good with ICC. 8.5/10

[Luis_RiodeJaneiro]

6/10 nothing special

[Mosaic]

9/10

[Eous]

8.5 out of 10

[Persiancat]

6 is enough

[Freezy89]

9/10

[DinamiT]

8/10

[skyperu34]

Not impressive, just height but inmense !

6.0/10

[tonyssa]

8.5/10

[Imperfect Ending]

7/10

ambitious

[hkskyline]

By tattooman from dchome :

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r313/tattooman616/IMG_3544.jpg

[dochan]

good 8/10

[Borisnifk]

7.5/10

[HK999]

9/10.

[Jan Del Castillo]

8. Good building. Regards.

[deranged]

8/10

[ireneo]

8.5

[#obert]

Not bad at all. 7/10

[Scion]

Pretty good for a residential tower

[Eric Offereins]

They look more like office towers, but I don't care. Impressive cluster with the other towers. :)
8/10

[krzewi]

7/10

[carl_vilches21]

By tattooman from dchome :

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r313/tattooman616/IMG_3544.jpg

9.5/10

Looks good at night.:cheers:

[Squiggles]

8/10

Looks better up close than farther away.

[sharky_88]

i like it, a lot of well componed glass 9/10

[christos-greece]

9/10

[xavarreiro]

8/10

[desertpunk]

The styling is actually qute nice, but you can't escape the sheer bulk of this monstrosity. 7.5

[c6josh]

voted 8/10 amazing

[national guard]

massive, monstrous.:)
still like it though.:)
8.5/10

[heroico]

By tattooman from dchome :

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r313/tattooman616/IMG_3544.jpg

nice 9/10

[sieradzanin1]

8/10

[makaveli6]

6.5/10

[KAZAN RESIDENT]

7/10

[samuelsamario]

8/10

[New York Morning]

8.5